Ultrahapticons

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11886639
  • Patent Number
    11,886,639
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 17, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 30, 2024
    10 months ago
  • Inventors
    • Brown; Eddie
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Nguyen; Phuong H
    Agents
    • Koffsky Schwalb LLC
    • Koffsky; Mark I.
Abstract
Described herein are “Ultrahapticons,” which are a set of tangible and recognizable mid-air haptic icons that have been derived from research study participants' metaphorical associations with car infotainment features. In line with semiotic theory (the study of signs), data from the study was analyzed to identify key characteristics that when realized in mid-air haptic form, would enable a user to “feel” the feature they are interacting with. Their use is not limited to an automotive context, they can be instrumented to any application that exhibits the same feature functionality i.e. home entertainment system, laptop UI's, digital communication, Extended Reality (XR), and the like.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates generally to improved techniques in establishing useful hand gestures within ultrasonic fields to activate features.


BACKGROUND

There are situations when receiving haptic feedback before touching the surface would be beneficial. These include when vision of the display is restricted, such as while driving, and when the user doesn't want to touch the device, such as when their hands are dirty. Providing feedback above the surface would also allow for an additional information channel alongside the visual.


A mid-air haptic feedback system creates tactile sensations in the air. One way to create mid-air haptic feedback is using ultrasound. A phased array of ultrasonic transducers is used to exert an acoustic radiation force on a target. This continuous distribution of sound energy, which will be referred to herein as an “acoustic field”, is useful for a range of applications, including haptic feedback.


It is known to control an acoustic field by defining one or more control points in a space within which the acoustic field may exist. Each control point is assigned an amplitude value equating to a desired amplitude of the acoustic field at the control point. Transducers are then controlled to create an acoustic field exhibiting the desired amplitude at each of the control points.


Tactile sensations on human skin can be created by using a phased array of ultrasound transducers to exert an acoustic radiation force on a target in mid-air. Ultrasound waves are transmitted by the transducers, with the phase emitted by each transducer adjusted such that the waves arrive concurrently at the target point in order to maximize the acoustic radiation force exerted.


By defining one or more control points in space, the acoustic field can be controlled. Each point can be assigned a value equating to a desired amplitude at the control point. A physical set of transducers can then be controlled to create an acoustic field exhibiting the desired amplitude at the control points.


As a result, mid-air gesture interaction in the automotive domain has been explored to counteract some drawbacks associated with increasingly ubiquitous touchscreen interfaces (e.g. added complexity and increased eyes-off-the-road time) yet remains a relatively fledgling modality. Naturally, gestures have their own limitations, namely potential cultural semantic nuances, the learning associated with more intricate gestures, and a lack of a sense of agency. Focused ultrasound can be used to create haptic sensations without requiring physical contact which creates the opportunity to bind tangible sensations to mid-air gestures; thus, haptic sensations can provide confirmatory cues thereby increasing one's feeling of control over their gesture. The advent of this technology also provides an alternative to auditory feedback as the latter could plausibly displease vehicle occupants by interrupting conversations and audible media. Furthermore, mid-air haptic icons could allow more expressivity than previous haptic technologies as result of information encoded via novel spatial and temporal interplay. This could provide higher resolution in relaying feature semantics and therefore reduce the onus on having intuitive gestures, learning the meaning of haptic signals or visually attending to a touchscreen for information transfers. From a user experience standpoint, the refinement of mid-air haptics for an automotive gesture interface could also improve user engagement and aesthetic appeal as seen in applications in public digital signage.


Preliminary investigations have compared mid-air haptic gesture (MAHG) interfaces with industry trending touchscreen solutions, and have notionally combined existing gesture sets with stock haptic sensations. These studies demonstrated clear benefits associated with MAHG interfaces, such as reduced eyes-off-the-road times and increased task performance. However, beyond their scope, was using semiotic and psychophysical principles to ground original holistic interaction designs by mapping gestures and haptics with specific tasks as well as optimizing haptic intensity, transience, pattern, location on the hand etc. All of these factors are likely to play a key role in augmenting the opportunities that mid-air haptics present, therefore, the aim of this ongoing program of research is to build and evaluate an exemplar set of robust, function-associated haptic gestures—based on human-centered design—to support an in-vehicle infotainment system (IVIS).


Current automotive mid-air gesture interfaces provide only visual and audible feedback as confirmation of a successfully executed interaction with an IVIS. Visual feedback presents the complication of providing potential for additional driver distraction from the roadway which is the third most common cause of car crashes; this is one of the primary problems that gesture interfaces aim to solve. Audible feedback is a reasonable alternative to this problem; however, it can be intrusive to the driving experience by interrupting music, radio, conversations or even sleeping occupants.


Using an arbitrary mid-air haptic sensation that actuates onto the driver's hand after they have performed an appropriate gesture/hand-pose can let the driver know their input has been acknowledged by the system which improves the driver's sense of agency (control) in their interaction. However, they still cannot be absolutely certain that the system has correctly distinguished their performed gesture from others in a gesture set without this information relayed through visual or auditory feedback. The premise behind this invention is therefore to transfer this information through the haptic channel using function-associated and user-centered mid-air haptic icons or “Ultrahapticons”. In this way, the driver can recognize the sensation for the intended infotainment feature and be confident they have made the right selection without removing their eyes from the road. Conversely if they recognize an Ultrahapticon that does not represent the feature they intended to select, they know there has been a false-positive in the system and they can perform their gesture again without affecting the system status. Additionally, Ultrahapticons hold potential for enabling an improved learning curve of the gesture set; this is a barrier to user acceptance of the interaction. Unfamiliarity with a novel interaction paradigm has also been linked to detrimental lane-keeping ability.


There have been a few research efforts to explore the augmentation of gestures with mid-air haptic feedback in the automotive sector as well as studies to investigate the human's ability to detect and recognize mid-air haptic sensations. Orestis Georgiou, Valerio Biscione, Adam Harwood, Daniel Griffiths, Marcello Giordano, Ben Long, and Tom Carter. 2017. Haptic In-vehicle gesture controls. 233-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3132045 (Georgiou) demonstrated a mid-air haptic gesture (MAHG) interface in this 2017 conference paper. Their interface gave an example of how mid-air haptic sensations can be assigned to match the behavior of the gestural actions. This prototype demonstrated a proof-of-concept that mid-air haptic sensations can be mapped onto a driver's gesture in real-time, however, the sensations are intended to represent the gestures and not the features themselves.


David R. Large, Kyle Harrington, Gary Burnett, and Orestis Georgiou. 2019. Feel the noise: Mid-air ultrasound haptics as a novel human-vehicle interaction paradigm. Appl. Ergon. (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102909 (Large) conducted a study where mid-air haptic buttons are seemingly suspended above the gear shifter in a driving simulator. The driver can “tap” these buttons with their palm to select and then move their palm sideways to adjust. During the adjustment interaction the driver feels haptic clicks on the palm to represent increments. This study aimed at evaluating the human factors issues when gestures are augmented with haptics in terms of driver safety and user experience, they found there were genuine advantages over in-vehicle touchscreen and non-haptic gesture input methods. This study provides evidence for the utility of mid-air haptics from an automotive human factors stand-point however the interface was function agnostic and the tasks were purely arbitrary.


Gözel Shaken, John H. Williamson, and Stephen Brewster. 2018. May the force be with you: Ultrasound haptic feedback for mid-air gesture interaction in cars. Proc.—10th Int. ACM Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl. AutomotiveUI 2018 July (2018), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239081 (Shaken) ran an experiment to establish the effects of combining 3 forms of feedback including peripheral visual, auditory and mid-air haptics. The sensations they used followed similar logic to the Georgiou et al prototype in that they mimicked the behavior and nature of the gesture and not the feature itself i.e. a gesture performed with a clockwise circular motion to increase volume was paired with a haptic that displayed a clockwise circular motion. In this study the participants were not always able to feel the sensations or distinguish between them which caused them to ignore the mid-air haptics entirely in some cases.


Davide Rocchesso, Francesco Saverio Cannizzaro, Giovanni Capizzi, and Francesco Landolina. 2019. Accessing and selecting menu items by in-air touch. (2019), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/335195.3352053 (Rocchesso) demonstrate a methodology for using arbitrary shapes as icons for different items in a multi-level menu. They show that certain shapes are easily confused with one another and should not be included coincidentally in a menu design. The icons used in this paper were arbitrary with no direct application for a specific use as this was not the intention of the research.


SUMMARY

Ultrahapticons are a set of tangible and recognizable mid-air haptic icons that have been derived from research study participants' metaphorical associations with car infotainment features by detecting movement of a human hand to operate an automotive function. In line with semiotic theory (the study of signs), data from the study was analyzed to identify key characteristics that when realized in mid-air haptic form, would enable a user to “feel” the feature they are interacting with. Their use is not limited to an automotive context, they can be instrumented to any application that exhibits the same feature functionality i.e. home entertainment system, laptop UI's, digital communication, Extended Reality (XR) etc.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.



FIGS. 1-3 show Ultrahapticons for telephone calls.



FIGS. 4-5 show Ultrahapticons for audio.



FIGS. 6-8 show Ultrahapticons for cabin temperature.



FIGS. 9-10 show Ultrahapticons for seat temperature.



FIG. 11 shows Ultrahapticons for fan speed.



FIGS. 12-14 show Ultrahapticons for navigation.



FIGS. 15-16 show Ultrahapticons for a home screen.



FIG. 17 shows semiotic components drawn from fan speed sketches.



FIG. 18 shows a diagram of Ultrahapticon concepts.





Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.


The apparatus and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION
I. Variable Haptic Sensitivity within the Hand

Various parts of the hand are susceptible to haptic effects in different ways. For example:

    • 1. Threshold Value. The fingertip has a lower threshold value than the palm. Since the maximum output of our device is also limited, that means that there will be more values of intensity that can be discriminated from within the fingertips.
    • 2. Frequency. The frequency range relevant to touch (0-500 Hz) is common through the body. But frequency resonance is achieved at different value of frequency through the hand. This means that greater displacement, and therefore greater perceived strength, can be achieved by designing Ultrahapticons with the right frequency for the right body part.
    • 3. Mechanoreceptor Density. The density of each mechanoreceptor through the hand is not constant. Discrimination between waveform will be greater at the fingertips.
    • 4. Pattern Propagation. Surface wave propagates through the skin and can affect positively or negatively our perception of mid-air haptics (e.g., speed optimization). This is specifically true for the palm, which is a large continuous skin part, but it is less true on a finger where skin parts are interrupted by the joints crease. It doesn't apply between fingers since this involves different skin parts. In addition, 2-point discrimination threshold (the ability to perceive two points as distinct and not one) is higher on the palm than on the fingertips. This means that multiple patterns, such as parallel lines or concentric circles, cannot be simultaneously render on the palm without being confused as one large fuzzy buzz. However, multiple patterns can be rendered on bones of a same finger.


II. Suite of Ultrahapticons


FIGS. 1-16 show 17 sensations that were generated for 7 infotainment features in a participatory design process (without limitation, the features shown in FIG. 13 can also be performed in reverse). The categories of features for which Ultrahapticons have been designed include: (a) telephone calls; (b) audio; (c) cabin temperature; (d) seat temperature; (e) fan speed; (f) navigation; and (g) home screen (i.e., a user interface landing page). Although specific time and space parameters are described herein, other parameters may similarly be operative to produce similar effects.


In addition, Ultrahapticons may be classified by where on the hand the effect is felt.


A. Ultrahapticons for Telephone Calls



FIG. 1 shows a sequence 100 for a metaphor: “Coiled Wire”. This Ultrahapticon intends to match with the metaphor of coiling the wire of a traditional telephone around the finger. The user receives a single focal point (dark dot) 110 that travels along a path (dark lines) rendered at around a 35-degree angle from right to left in three sequential locations 120, 130, 410 going up the index finger towards the tip.


This is a “single finger only” Ultrahapticon.



FIG. 2 shows a sequence 200 for a metaphor: “Bouncing Handset”. This Ultrahapticon is intended to emulate the handset of an old telephone, bouncing in its cradle as it rings, the focal rings are supposed to represent the speaker and microphone sections of the handset. The user receives a focal ring 210 “bouncing” between 4 locations 220, 230, 240, 250 to the temporal rhythm of a retro telephone ring. The full sensation consists of a 1 second loop of 6 taps over the 4 locations (with 2 taps at the final location−base of thumb). After the first 3 taps there is a small pause before the next 3 follow.


This is a “palm only” Ultrahapticon.



FIG. 3 shows a sequence 300 for a metaphor: “Rotary Dial”. This Ultrahapticon aims to emulate the holes of a rotary dial on an old-fashioned telephone. When accepting an incoming phone call, the user shall receive 5 sequential, equally spaced haptic circles 310, 320, 330, 340, 350 that are rendered from the bottom left of the palm in a semi-circular path to the base of the little finger knuckle; each haptic circle is sequentially stronger intensity than the last. If the user were rejecting an incoming phone call, they would receive the above sensation however this time it would be flipped 180 so that the sensation starts at the base of the little finger, follows the medial edge of the palm and ends at the base of the thumb. The sequence of intensity is also reversed so that each haptic circle is 0.1 less than the previous intensity, i.e., 1-0.6.


This is a “palm only” Ultrahapticon.


B. Ultrahapticons for Audio



FIG. 4 shows a sequence 400 for a metaphor: “Bass Speaker”. For this Ultrahapticon, the driver receives a continuous pulsing sensation 410, 420, 430, 440, 450 at the ends of the fingertips that intends to resemble the users' metaphor of bass emanating from a speaker.


This is a “two finger only” Ultrahapticon.



FIG. 5 shows a sequence 500 for a metaphor: “Sound Waves”. The intention with this Ultrahapticon is to signify the users' metaphor of sound waves. The user receives a small two bar sensation that starts in between the middle and index finger knuckle 510 that increases in size as it travels up the fingers 520, 530. The small two bar sensation then resumes in between the middle and index finger knuckle 540.


This is a “two finger only” Ultrahapticon.


C. Ultrahapticons for Cabin Temperature



FIG. 6 shows a sequence 600 for a metaphor: “Flames”. The user receives a continuous sensation of focal points that intend to represent the metaphor of flames licking the index and middle fingers 610, 620, 630, 640, 650, 660 to signify the hot aspect of temperature. The focal points will jump randomly from one location on one finger to another on the other finger with equal intervals. The locations will be dictated by the 3 joints on the fingers.


This is a “two finger only” Ultrahapticon.



FIG. 7 shows a sequence 700 for a metaphor: “Ice”. The user shall receive a solid double bar on the thumb actuating at 4 pulses per second (BPS) 710, 720, 730, 740, 750. This Ultrahapticon represents the metaphor of ice in order to signify the cool aspect of temperature and can be used in conjunction with Flames to create a representation of a temperature scale.


This is a “thumb only” Ultrahapticon.



FIG. 8 shows a sequence 800 for a metaphor “Thermometer”. This Ultrahapticon aims to convey the rising and falling mercury in the metaphor of a thermometer and subsequently represent temperature. The user feels a “double bar” haptic sensation, initially, halfway up the palm; this “double bar” then accelerates up the index and middle fingers and decelerates as it reaches the fingertips where it pauses momentarily 810. Once at the fingertips, the double bar then accelerates all the way down the hand and then decelerates as it reaches the bottom of the palm where it pauses momentarily again 820. After this, the double bar slides back to the original position. Within this haptic animation there will be notches at, for example, 6 equidistant locations in the travel envelope. Thus, the user will feel a drop in intensity between these locations to accentuate the metaphor of a thermometer's increments. After the initial animation, to indicate increasing temperature, the double bar starts focused on the middle of the hand then it will travel to the index and middle fingertips over 2 seconds. Conversely, to indicate a decrease in temperature, the double bar will travel down from the middle of the hand to the bottom of the palm over 2 seconds.


This is a “palm and two finger” Ultrahapticon.


D. Ultrahapticons for Seat Temperature



FIG. 9 shows a sequence 900 for a metaphor: “Seat Profile”. This Ultrahapticon aims to convey the profile of a seat that is prevalent metaphor for the seat heater and cooler. The user will feel a “double bar” haptic sensation, initially, at the tips of the index and middle fingers. This “double bar” then accelerates down the index and middle fingers and decelerates as it reaches the base of the thumb/bottom of palm where it where it pauses momentarily 910. Once at the base of the thumb, the double bar then accelerates up towards the thumb where it decelerates at the tip and pauses momentarily again 920. After this, it accelerates down to the base of the thumb, pauses momentarily 930 and then accelerates back up the index and middle fingers and culminates with another subtle deceleration 940.


This is a “thumb, palm and two finger” Ultrahapticon.



FIG. 10 shows a sequence 1000 for a metaphor: “Heating Elements”. This Ultrahapticon aims to convey snaking heating elements embedded in a car seat which are associated with the seat temperature feature. The user feels a focal ring at the base of the thumb 1010; this sensation then travels in an S-shape path up the palm 1020 to finish at the base of the middle finger knuckle 1030.


This is a “palm only” Ultrahapticon.


E. Ultrahapticons for Fan Speed



FIG. 11 shows a sequence 1100 for a metaphor: “Propeller Fan”. The user receives a continuous anti-clockwise rotation of 3 haptic focal points 1110, 1120, 1130 to represent the users' metaphor of a propeller fan turning.


This is a “palm only” Ultrahapticon.


F. Ultrahapticons for Navigation



FIG. 12 shows a sequence 1200 for a metaphor: “T Junction”. This Ultrahapticon represents a T-junction on a road which was commonly elicited as participants' mental model for navigation. The user receives a dynamic sensation that starts with a single focal point at the middle-bottom of the palm 1210 then travels up the palm 1220. Once the haptic focal point reaches the center of the knuckles 1230, it splits into two separate focal points 1240, 1250; one travels left across the knuckles and the other follows right along the knuckles.


This is a “palm only” Ultrahapticon.



FIG. 13 shows a sequence 1300 for a metaphor: “Compass Out”. This Ultrahapticon aims to coincidentally represent three separate metaphors: “the compass”, “crossroads” and “‘X’ marks the spot”. A single focal point starts in the center of the palm 1310, from which splits off four focal points of equal size 1320. These four focal points move in synchrony 1330 towards equidistant locations at the distal, proximal, lateral, and medial extremes of the palm 1340. An alternative to the “Compass Out” is the “Compass In” which works in the dynamic inverse of the of the above sensation.


This is a “palm only” Ultrahapticon.



FIG. 14 shows a sequence 1400 for a metaphor: “Waypoint Blip”. This Ultrahapticon represents the metaphor of waypoint visual on a GPS interface to signify navigation. A pulse in the center of the palm 1410 spreads outwards 1420, 1430 and fades 1440.


This is a “palm only” Ultrahapticon.


G. Ultrahapticons for Home Screen



FIG. 15 shows a sequence 1500 for a metaphor: “House Roof”. A focal point renders an equilateral triangle to represent the roof of a house which was a construct extracted by participants to represent the “Home” function. The focal point starts at the base of the thumb 1510 and completes three separate strokes as sides of the triangle. At each point of the triangle there is a momentary pause before the rendering continues 1520, 1530 as this is known to improve recognition.


This is a “palm only” Ultrahapticon.



FIG. 16 shows a sequence 1600 for a metaphor: “Sofa Cushion”. A mid-air haptic ring starts in the center of the palm 1610, it expands in thickness and diameter 1620, 1630 at which point it shrinks back to its original dimensions 1640, 1650. This Ultrahapticon replicates the compression of a cushion as one sits on a sofa; this is a semi-abstract metaphor that study participants had for the home screen function.


This is a “palm only” Ultrahapticon.


III. Study of Ultrahapticons Creation

A. Feature and Participant Selection


It was evident in the related work that the non-driving related task (NDRT) and User Interface (UI) design is principle in the success of MAHGs. Results from Large indicated that MAHGs appear superior to a touchscreen interface and mid-air gestures (without haptics), with regard to visual demand and task performance, for tasks that involve incrementally adjusting a setting. However, the results indicate that the touchscreen is more appropriate for the selection of a non-goal orientated 4×4 button grid when compared with MAHGs in a car following paradigm simulation. Arguably, the button selection condition might yield different results if the UI reflected the smaller button proportions inherent in some contemporary production vehicles. Hence, an expert user experience appraisal was conducted in a Tesla Model X to identify ecologically valid features and interactions in the touchscreen interface that could benefit from actuation using MAHGs. These consisted of discrete selection and continuous adjustment interactions for fan speed, cabin and seat temperature, navigation and audio volume; discrete shortcut interactions for telephone calls and the landing page (home) as well as response to telephone call notifications.


A participatory design study was subsequently conducted with a sample of seventeen participants (Male n11, Female n6, Age Range 19-65 yrs, mean 30 yrs) comprising members of the Nottingham Electric Vehicle Owners Club, staff and students at the University of Nottingham and non-technical employees at Ultraleap Ltd. Understanding cultural difference was considered important therefore multiple nationalities were recruited for the sample (UK [n7], Mexico [n3], Malaysia [n3], Hungary [n1], Spain [n2] and India [n1]).


B. Participatory Design Study Procedure


The procedure encompasses an amalgamation of learnings from related literature. Six of the participants were involved in individual face-to-face sessions where they experienced the mid-air haptic technology (the exposed group); eleven were organized remotely as a result of Covid-19 lockdown measures (the non-exposed group), the technology was therefore comprehensively demonstrated to them via remote video call.


C. Cognitive Mapping


Following a practice word-association task, participants verbalized the mental models they associated with each infotainment feature. Specifically, participants were asked “For the words [infotainment feature] what would you associate [tactually i.e. physical sensations; visually, as mental images or objects and auditorily i.e. sounds.]?”. Participants were encouraged to consider the words themselves and not the features within context based on findings that structuring the questioning in this way led to less bias yet still yielded concrete metaphors.


D. Mental Model Visualization.


The next stage involved asking the participants to sketch the visual, auditory and tactual elements they had previously mentioned. In consideration of differing sketching abilities, the participants were encouraged to follow a “think-aloud” protocol as they sketched; this would enable the investigator to review video footage to understand the participants' thought processes if the sketch wasn't sufficiently communicative. The investigator demonstrated with an arbitrary example of a radio metaphor illustrated as a retro “boombox” radio, and then directed the participants to render a conceptual sketch for each feature. The “exposed” group were then demonstrated examples of sensations via the Ultraleap STRATOS explore array and the non-exposed group had the technology and types of sensations thoroughly described to them with aid from a graphical visualizer. The participants were then informed of twelve tunable, mid-air haptic parameters that could be manipulated to create different sensations. Using this information the participants highlighted elements of each sketch they thought most embodied the metaphor (i.e. the antenna on the radio example); they were then encouraged by the investigator to elicit how they would use the parameters, along with a nominal open palm gesture, to encapsulate these characteristics as their personal mid-air haptic icons, or “Ultrahapticons”.


E. Ultrahapticon Refinement


The next step guided the participants to extend their designs to include how specific dimensions of the sensation would adapt to reflect a user-manipulated change in the feature setting (real-time interactional feedback). This time the participants were asked to consider that the feature will be adjusted using a more realistic “index finger and thumb pinch” hand pose and that they should elicit what axis this hand pose should move along to influence the function. This gesture was selected based on current design guidelines for automotive gesture interfaces generated by the array manufacturer-Ultraleap.


F. Semiotic Decomposition


The Ultrahapticon study elicited 119 total sketched designs which were analyzed for their semiotic components to determine the most intuitive designs for each feature (referent). First the participants' mental model sketches were classified into distinct prevailing styles (proposals). Although not specifically instructed to, many of the participants proposed multiple styles for a single referent. To account for this, the proposals were analyzed for “Max Consensus” (MC: percent of participants eliciting the most popular proposal) and “Consensus-Distinct Ratio” (CDR: the spread of participants displaying the most popular proposal−the closer the value is to 1, the smaller the spread and the more agreement there is among participants). Singular incidences of proposals were eliminated resulting in a shortlist of 23 Ultrahapticon styles for the 7 features.


The next level of analysis involved breaking down the styles into exemplar level semiotic components; their feature “constructs” and “intents”. Constructs are physical characteristics of a feature that, collectively, comprise the holistic mental model (e.g. the rails of a rocking chair); an intent is a symbolic construct that is used by the designer to express meaning or behavior (e.g. blurred lines indicating movement of the rocking chair).



FIG. 17 shows one example as the process map 1800 for the fan speed feature with a CDR of 0.319 and MC of 59%. “Styles” included propeller 1810, air vents 1820, hair blowing 1830 and car HMI 1840. “Constructs and Intents” for: hair blowing 1830 included hair strands 1832, air movement 1831; for Car HMI included LED indicators 1843, turning dial 1842, air movement 1841; for propeller 1810 included rotation 1811, blades, 1812, clunky buttons 1813, whirring 1814, grid cover 1815, air movement 1816; and for air vents 1820 included grid 1821, air movement 1822 and directional toggle 1823.


Derived from the 23 styles were 88 distinct semiotic features; these were analyzed further for consensus which indicated that 65 were commonly occurring (appearing at least twice). 32 of these were adapted by the participants into their Ultrahapticon designs.


These Ultrahapticons were subsequently decomposed into their value level components to understand the participants' expectation of the real-time interactional feedback. This included understanding any consensus regarding construct rendering; what spatial, temporal and spatiotemporal parameters were used to signify feature intents; location of the sensations on the hand, axial direction of the pinch gesture and the dynamic adaptation of the sensation to reflect the feature adjustment.


Limited consensus was observed among the participants during the technical “value level” part of the study and sometimes the concepts were not feasible. Therefore, some results were adapted based on literature heuristics and where high disagreement occurred, all variations were considered for that icon style. Additionally, frequently reoccurring constructs and intents from popular styles that weren't selected for haptification by participants were reimagined as sensations by the investigator on the basis that these may have been discarded purely due to the participants' partial understanding of feasibility. This was exacerbated by the language barrier in some cases which was the only cultural difference observed in the study. To refine the resultant 30 user-centered Ultrahapticons, a remote workshop was conducted with four mid-air haptic experts. The Ultrahapticon design process was described to the attendees after which they were asked to rate each concept on a five-point Likert scale pertaining to feature appropriateness, expected salience, naturalism, instant recognizability, perspicuity, and technical feasibility. They then provided expert consultation on how to adapt the designs to improve the aforementioned aspects. The data from the workshop was used to hone the concepts and the result was a shortlist of 17 sensations for 7 features.



FIG. 18 shows a process map 1700 for these 7 IVIS features and their associated chosen 17 Ultrahapticons.


For IVIS feature Telephone Calls 1720, the chosen Ultrahapticons were “Rotary Dial” 1722, “Coiled Wire” 1724, “Bouncing Headset”.


For IVIS feature Audio 1760, the chosen Ultrahapticons were “Sound Waves” 1762 and “Bass Speaker” 1764.


For IVIS feature Cabin Temperature 1730, the chosen Ultrahapticons were “Fire” 1732, “Ice” 1734, and “Thermometer” 1736.


For IVIS feature Seat Temperature 1770, the chosen Ultrahapticons were “Heating Elements” 1772 and “Seat Profile” 1774.


For IVIS feature Navigation 1740, the chosen Ultrahapticons were “Compass” 1742 (both “Compass In” and “Compass Out”), “Road Systems” 1744, “T-Junction” 1746, “Waypoint Blip” 1748.


For IVIS feature Fan Speed 1750, the chosen Ultrahapticon was “Propeller” 1752.


For IVIS feature Home 1710, the chosen Ultrahapticons were “Sofa Cushion” 1714 and “Triangular Roof” 1712.


G. Conclusions and Future Work


The next phase in this research may determine the most articulate icons from the shortlist; the icons will be prototyped along with synchronous hand poses based on established psychophysical principles and then evaluated in a salience study. An initial objective will be to understand the “articulatory directness” of the icons, that is the strength of the link between feature and metaphor and whether the icon rendering reflects the intended symbolism. This includes identifying the optimal way of manipulating haptic spatio-temporal dimensions to reflect the dynamic interaction with a specific feature.


The next study may also focus on perceptual optimization of the icon set by testing the icons' salience under simulated workload similar to that of a driving task. This will determine whether certain icons are masked through cognitive load and whether some sensations are confused with others within the set. When eventually tested in a driving simulator, this design process will improve the likelihood of validating distraction and task time measures associated with this MAHG concept without perception confounds.


IV. CONCLUSION

The various features of the foregoing embodiments may be selected and combined to produce numerous variations of improved haptic-based systems.


In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.


The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.


Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has”, “having,” “includes”, “including,” “contains”, “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a”, “has . . . a”, “includes . . . a”, “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially”, “essentially”, “approximately”, “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.


The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: detecting movement of a human hand issuing an activation command for an automotive function; to confirm the activation command, creating tactile sensations on a target on a human hand by using a phased array of ultrasound transducers to transmit ultrasound waves to exert an acoustic radiation force on the human skin in mid-air;adjusting a phase emitted by each ultrasound transducer such that the ultrasound waves arrive concurrently at the target in order to maximize the acoustic radiation force exerted;wherein the maximize the acoustic radiation force exerted is directed at least one finger of the human hand by adjusting threshold value, frequency, and pattern propagation in view of mechanoreceptor density of the human hand, such that a 2-point discrimination threshold is achieved on at least one finger of the human hand.
  • 2. The method as in claim 1, wherein adjusting the threshold value, the frequency, and the pattern propagation in view of the mechanoreceptor density of the human hand results in single focal point that travels along a path rendered at around a 35-degree angle from right to left in three sequential locations going up an index finger towards the tip.
  • 3. The method as in claim 2, wherein the at least one finger is two adjacent fingers.
  • 4. The method as in claim 3, wherein adjusting the threshold value, the frequency, and the pattern propagation in view of the mechanoreceptor density of the human hand results in pulsing sensation at fingertip ends of the two adjacent fingers.
  • 5. The method as in claim 3, wherein adjusting the threshold value, the frequency, and the pattern propagation in view of the mechanoreceptor density of the human hand results in a two bar sensation that starts in between a middle finger and an index finger that increases in size as it travels up the index finger and the middle finger.
  • 6. The method as in claim 3, wherein adjusting the threshold value, the frequency, and the pattern propagation in view of the mechanoreceptor density of the human hand results in focal points jumping randomly from one location on one finger to another on another finger with equal intervals.
  • 7. The method as in claim 3, wherein adjusting the threshold value, the frequency, and the pattern propagation in view of the mechanoreceptor density of the human hand results in: (1) a double bar effect that accelerates up an index finger and a middle finger and decelerates as it reaches fingertips where it pauses momentarily; (2) the double bar effect accelerates down the human hand and then decelerates as it reaches a bottom of a palm where the double bar effect pauses momentarily again; and (3) the double bar effect slides back to its original position.
  • 8. The method as in claim 1, wherein the at least one finger of the human hand comprises a thumb of the human hand.
  • 9. The method as in claim 8, wherein adjusting the threshold value, the frequency, and the pattern propagation in view of the mechanoreceptor density of the human hand results in a solid double bar effect actuating on the thumb.
  • 10. The method as in claim 8, wherein adjusting the threshold value, the frequency, and the pattern propagation in view of the mechanoreceptor density of the human hand results in: (1) a double bar haptic sensation at tips of an index finger and a middle finger; (2) the double bar haptic sensation accelerates down the index finger and the middle finger and decelerates as it reaches a base of a thumb where it pauses momentarily; (3) the double bar haptic sensation then accelerates up towards the thumb where it decelerates at a thump tip and pauses momentarily; and (4) the double bar haptic sensation accelerates down to a base of the thumb, pauses momentarily and then accelerates back up the index finder and the middle finger and then decelerates.
PRIOR APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of the following application, which is incorporated by references in its entirety: Ser. No. 63/079,708, filed Sep. 17, 2020.

US Referenced Citations (364)
Number Name Date Kind
4218921 Berge Aug 1980 A
4760525 Webb Jul 1988 A
4771205 Mequio Sep 1988 A
4881212 Takeuchi Nov 1989 A
5226000 Moses Jul 1993 A
5235986 Maslak Aug 1993 A
5243344 Koulopoulos Sep 1993 A
5329682 Thurn Jul 1994 A
5371834 Tawel Dec 1994 A
5422431 Ichiki Jun 1995 A
5426388 Flora Jun 1995 A
5477736 Lorraine Dec 1995 A
5511296 Dias Apr 1996 A
5729694 Holzrichter Mar 1998 A
5859915 Norris Jan 1999 A
6029518 Oeftering Feb 2000 A
6193936 Gardner Feb 2001 B1
6216538 Yasuda Apr 2001 B1
6436051 Morris Aug 2002 B1
6503204 Sumanaweera Jan 2003 B1
6647359 Verplank Nov 2003 B1
6771294 Pulli Aug 2004 B1
6772490 Toda Aug 2004 B2
6800987 Toda Oct 2004 B2
7107159 German Sep 2006 B2
7109789 Spencer Sep 2006 B2
7182726 Williams Feb 2007 B2
7225404 Zilles May 2007 B1
7284027 Jennings, III Oct 2007 B2
7345600 Fedigan Mar 2008 B1
7487662 Schabron Feb 2009 B2
7497662 Mollmann Mar 2009 B2
7577260 Hooley Aug 2009 B1
7692661 Cook Apr 2010 B2
RE42192 Schabron Mar 2011 E
7966134 German Jun 2011 B2
8000481 Nishikawa Aug 2011 B2
8123502 Blakey Feb 2012 B2
8269168 Axelrod Sep 2012 B1
8279193 Birnbaum Oct 2012 B1
8351646 Fujimura Jan 2013 B2
8369973 Risbo Feb 2013 B2
8594350 Hooley Nov 2013 B2
8607922 Werner Dec 2013 B1
8782109 Tsutsui Jul 2014 B2
8823674 Birnbaum Sep 2014 B2
8833510 Koh Sep 2014 B2
8884927 Cheatham, III Nov 2014 B1
9208664 Peters Dec 2015 B1
9267735 Funayama Feb 2016 B2
9421291 Robert Aug 2016 B2
9612658 Subramanian Apr 2017 B2
9662680 Yamamoto May 2017 B2
9667173 Kappus May 2017 B1
9816757 Zielinski Nov 2017 B1
9841819 Carter Dec 2017 B2
9863699 Corbin, III Jan 2018 B2
9898089 Subramanian Feb 2018 B2
9945818 Ganti Apr 2018 B2
9958943 Long May 2018 B2
9977120 Carter May 2018 B2
10101811 Carter Oct 2018 B2
10101814 Carter Oct 2018 B2
10133353 Eid Nov 2018 B2
10140776 Schwarz Nov 2018 B2
10146353 Smith Dec 2018 B1
10168782 Tchon Jan 2019 B1
10268275 Carter Apr 2019 B2
10281567 Carter May 2019 B2
10318008 Sinha Jun 2019 B2
10444842 Long Oct 2019 B2
10469973 Hayashi Nov 2019 B2
10496175 Long Dec 2019 B2
10497358 Tester Dec 2019 B2
10510357 Kovesi Dec 2019 B2
10520252 Momen Dec 2019 B2
10523159 Megretski Dec 2019 B2
10531212 Long Jan 2020 B2
10535174 Rigiroli Jan 2020 B1
10569300 Hoshi Feb 2020 B2
10593101 Han Mar 2020 B1
10599434 Barrett Mar 2020 B1
10657704 Han May 2020 B1
10685538 Carter Jun 2020 B2
10755538 Carter Aug 2020 B2
10818162 Carter Oct 2020 B2
10911861 Buckland Feb 2021 B2
10915177 Carter Feb 2021 B2
10921890 Subramanian Feb 2021 B2
10930123 Carter Feb 2021 B2
10943578 Long Mar 2021 B2
10991074 Bousmalis Apr 2021 B2
11048329 Lee Jun 2021 B1
11098951 Kappus Aug 2021 B2
11113860 Rigiroli Sep 2021 B2
11169610 Sarafianou Nov 2021 B2
11189140 Long Nov 2021 B2
11204644 Long Dec 2021 B2
11276281 Carter Mar 2022 B2
11531395 Kappus Dec 2022 B2
11543507 Carter Jan 2023 B2
11550395 Beattie Jan 2023 B2
11550432 Carter Jan 2023 B2
11553295 Kappus Jan 2023 B2
11714492 Carter Aug 2023 B2
11715453 Kappus Aug 2023 B2
11727790 Carter Aug 2023 B2
11740018 Kappus Aug 2023 B2
11742870 Long Aug 2023 B2
20010007591 Pompei Jul 2001 A1
20010033124 Norris Oct 2001 A1
20020149570 Knowles Oct 2002 A1
20030024317 Miller Feb 2003 A1
20030144032 Brunner Jul 2003 A1
20030182647 Radeskog Sep 2003 A1
20040005715 Schabron Jan 2004 A1
20040014434 Haardt Jan 2004 A1
20040052387 Norris Mar 2004 A1
20040091119 Duraiswami May 2004 A1
20040210158 Organ Oct 2004 A1
20040226378 Oda Nov 2004 A1
20040264707 Yang Dec 2004 A1
20050052714 Klug Mar 2005 A1
20050056851 Althaus Mar 2005 A1
20050148874 Brock-Fisher Jul 2005 A1
20050212760 Marvit Sep 2005 A1
20050226437 Pellegrini Oct 2005 A1
20050267695 German Dec 2005 A1
20050273483 Dent Dec 2005 A1
20060085049 Cory Apr 2006 A1
20060090955 Cardas May 2006 A1
20060091301 Trisnadi May 2006 A1
20060164428 Cook Jul 2006 A1
20070036492 Lee Feb 2007 A1
20070094317 Wang Apr 2007 A1
20070177681 Choi Aug 2007 A1
20070214462 Boillot Sep 2007 A1
20070236450 Colgate Oct 2007 A1
20070263741 Erving Nov 2007 A1
20080012647 Risbo Jan 2008 A1
20080027686 Mollmann Jan 2008 A1
20080084789 Altman Apr 2008 A1
20080130906 Goldstein Jun 2008 A1
20080152191 Fujimura Jun 2008 A1
20080226088 Aarts Sep 2008 A1
20080273723 Hartung Nov 2008 A1
20080300055 Lutnick Dec 2008 A1
20090093724 Pernot Apr 2009 A1
20090116660 Croft, III May 2009 A1
20090232684 Hirata Sep 2009 A1
20090251421 Bloebaum Oct 2009 A1
20090319065 Risbo Dec 2009 A1
20100013613 Weston Jan 2010 A1
20100016727 Rosenberg Jan 2010 A1
20100030076 Vortman Feb 2010 A1
20100044120 Richter Feb 2010 A1
20100066512 Rank Mar 2010 A1
20100085168 Kyung Apr 2010 A1
20100103246 Schwerdtner Apr 2010 A1
20100109481 Buccafusca May 2010 A1
20100199232 Mistry Aug 2010 A1
20100231508 Cruz-Hernandez Sep 2010 A1
20100262008 Roundhill Oct 2010 A1
20100302015 Kipman Dec 2010 A1
20100321216 Jonsson Dec 2010 A1
20110006888 Bae Jan 2011 A1
20110010958 Clark Jan 2011 A1
20110051554 Varray Mar 2011 A1
20110066032 Vitek Mar 2011 A1
20110199342 Vartanian Aug 2011 A1
20110310028 Camp, Jr. Dec 2011 A1
20120057733 Morii Mar 2012 A1
20120063628 Rizzello Mar 2012 A1
20120066280 Tsutsui Mar 2012 A1
20120223880 Birnbaum Sep 2012 A1
20120229400 Birnbaum Sep 2012 A1
20120229401 Birnbaum Sep 2012 A1
20120236689 Brown Sep 2012 A1
20120243374 Dahl Sep 2012 A1
20120249409 Toney Oct 2012 A1
20120249474 Pratt Oct 2012 A1
20120299853 Dagar Nov 2012 A1
20120307649 Park Dec 2012 A1
20120315605 Cho Dec 2012 A1
20130035582 Radulescu Feb 2013 A1
20130079621 Shoham Mar 2013 A1
20130094678 Scholte Apr 2013 A1
20130100008 Marti Apr 2013 A1
20130101141 Mcelveen Apr 2013 A1
20130173658 Adelman Jul 2013 A1
20130331705 Fraser Dec 2013 A1
20140027201 Islam Jan 2014 A1
20140104274 Hilliges Apr 2014 A1
20140139071 Yamamoto May 2014 A1
20140168091 Jones Jun 2014 A1
20140201666 Bedikian Jul 2014 A1
20140204002 Bennet Jul 2014 A1
20140265572 Siedenburg Sep 2014 A1
20140267065 Levesque Sep 2014 A1
20140269207 Baym Sep 2014 A1
20140269208 Baym Sep 2014 A1
20140269214 Baym Sep 2014 A1
20140270305 Baym Sep 2014 A1
20140320436 Modarres Oct 2014 A1
20140361988 Katz Dec 2014 A1
20140369514 Baym Dec 2014 A1
20150002477 Cheatham, III Jan 2015 A1
20150005039 Liu Jan 2015 A1
20150006645 Oh Jan 2015 A1
20150007025 Sassi Jan 2015 A1
20150013023 Wang Jan 2015 A1
20150019299 Harvey Jan 2015 A1
20150022466 Levesque Jan 2015 A1
20150029155 Lee Jan 2015 A1
20150066445 Lin Mar 2015 A1
20150070147 Cruz-Hernandez Mar 2015 A1
20150070245 Han Mar 2015 A1
20150078136 Sun Mar 2015 A1
20150081110 Houston Mar 2015 A1
20150084929 Lee Mar 2015 A1
20150110310 Minnaar Apr 2015 A1
20150130323 Harris May 2015 A1
20150168205 Lee Jun 2015 A1
20150192995 Subramanian Jul 2015 A1
20150209564 Lewin Jul 2015 A1
20150220199 Wang Aug 2015 A1
20150226537 Schorre Aug 2015 A1
20150226831 Nakamura Aug 2015 A1
20150241393 Ganti Aug 2015 A1
20150248787 Abovitz Sep 2015 A1
20150258431 Stafford Sep 2015 A1
20150277610 Kim Oct 2015 A1
20150293592 Cheong Oct 2015 A1
20150304789 Babayoff Oct 2015 A1
20150323667 Przybyla Nov 2015 A1
20150331576 Piya Nov 2015 A1
20150332075 Burch Nov 2015 A1
20160019762 Levesque Jan 2016 A1
20160019879 Daley Jan 2016 A1
20160026253 Bradski Jan 2016 A1
20160044417 Clemen, Jr. Feb 2016 A1
20160124080 Carter May 2016 A1
20160138986 Carlin May 2016 A1
20160175701 Froy Jun 2016 A1
20160175709 Idris Jun 2016 A1
20160189702 Blanc Jun 2016 A1
20160242724 Lavallee Aug 2016 A1
20160246374 Carter Aug 2016 A1
20160249150 Carter Aug 2016 A1
20160291716 Boser Oct 2016 A1
20160306423 Uttermann Oct 2016 A1
20160320843 Long Nov 2016 A1
20160339132 Cosman Nov 2016 A1
20160374562 Vertikov Dec 2016 A1
20170002839 Bukland Jan 2017 A1
20170004819 Ochiai Jan 2017 A1
20170018171 Carter Jan 2017 A1
20170024921 Beeler Jan 2017 A1
20170052148 Estevez Feb 2017 A1
20170123487 Hazra May 2017 A1
20170123499 Eid May 2017 A1
20170140552 Woo May 2017 A1
20170144190 Hoshi May 2017 A1
20170153707 Subramanian Jun 2017 A1
20170168586 Sinha Jun 2017 A1
20170181725 Han Jun 2017 A1
20170193768 Long Jul 2017 A1
20170193823 Jiang Jul 2017 A1
20170211022 Reinke Jul 2017 A1
20170236506 Przybyla Aug 2017 A1
20170270356 Sills Sep 2017 A1
20170279951 Hwang Sep 2017 A1
20170336860 Smoot Nov 2017 A1
20170366908 Long Dec 2017 A1
20180035891 Van Soest Feb 2018 A1
20180039333 Carter Feb 2018 A1
20180047259 Carter Feb 2018 A1
20180074580 Hardee Mar 2018 A1
20180081439 Daniels Mar 2018 A1
20180101234 Carter Apr 2018 A1
20180139557 Ochiai May 2018 A1
20180146306 Benattar May 2018 A1
20180151035 Maalouf May 2018 A1
20180166063 Long Jun 2018 A1
20180181203 Subramanian Jun 2018 A1
20180182372 Tester Jun 2018 A1
20180190007 Panteleev Jul 2018 A1
20180246576 Long Aug 2018 A1
20180253627 Baradel Sep 2018 A1
20180267156 Carter Sep 2018 A1
20180304310 Long Oct 2018 A1
20180309515 Murakowski Oct 2018 A1
20180310111 Kappus Oct 2018 A1
20180350339 Macours Dec 2018 A1
20180361174 Radulescu Dec 2018 A1
20190001129 Rosenbluth Jan 2019 A1
20190038496 Levesque Feb 2019 A1
20190091565 Nelson Mar 2019 A1
20190163275 Iodice May 2019 A1
20190175077 Zhang Jun 2019 A1
20190187244 Riccardi Jun 2019 A1
20190196578 Iodice Jun 2019 A1
20190196591 Long Jun 2019 A1
20190197840 Kappus Jun 2019 A1
20190197841 Carter Jun 2019 A1
20190197842 Long Jun 2019 A1
20190204925 Long Jul 2019 A1
20190206202 Carter Jul 2019 A1
20190235628 Lacroix Aug 2019 A1
20190257932 Carter Aug 2019 A1
20190310710 Deeley Oct 2019 A1
20190342654 Buckland Nov 2019 A1
20200042091 Long Feb 2020 A1
20200080776 Kappus Mar 2020 A1
20200082221 Tsai Mar 2020 A1
20200082804 Kappus Mar 2020 A1
20200103974 Carter Apr 2020 A1
20200117229 Long Apr 2020 A1
20200193269 Park Jun 2020 A1
20200218354 Beattie Jul 2020 A1
20200257371 Sung Aug 2020 A1
20200294299 Rigiroli Sep 2020 A1
20200302760 Carter Sep 2020 A1
20200320347 Nikolenko Oct 2020 A1
20200327418 Lyons Oct 2020 A1
20200380832 Carter Dec 2020 A1
20210037332 Kappus Feb 2021 A1
20210043070 Carter Feb 2021 A1
20210056693 Cheng Feb 2021 A1
20210109712 Oliver Apr 2021 A1
20210111731 Oliver Apr 2021 A1
20210112353 Brian Apr 2021 A1
20210141458 Sarafianou May 2021 A1
20210165491 Sun Jun 2021 A1
20210170447 Buckland Jun 2021 A1
20210183215 Carter Jun 2021 A1
20210201884 Kappus Jul 2021 A1
20210225355 Long Jul 2021 A1
20210303072 Carter Sep 2021 A1
20210303758 Long Sep 2021 A1
20210334706 Yamaguchi Oct 2021 A1
20210381765 Kappus Dec 2021 A1
20210397261 Kappus Dec 2021 A1
20220035479 Lasater Feb 2022 A1
20220095068 Kappus Mar 2022 A1
20220113806 Long Apr 2022 A1
20220155949 Ring May 2022 A1
20220198892 Carter Jun 2022 A1
20220236806 Carter Jul 2022 A1
20220252550 Catsis Aug 2022 A1
20220300028 Long Sep 2022 A1
20220300070 Iodice Sep 2022 A1
20220329250 Long Oct 2022 A1
20220393095 Chilles Dec 2022 A1
20230036123 Long Feb 2023 A1
20230075917 Pittera Mar 2023 A1
20230117919 Iodice Apr 2023 A1
20230124704 Rorke Apr 2023 A1
20230141896 Liu May 2023 A1
20230168228 Brian Jun 2023 A1
20230215248 Lowther Jul 2023 A1
20230228857 Carter Jul 2023 A1
20230251720 William Aug 2023 A1
20230259213 Long Aug 2023 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (70)
Number Date Country
2470115 Jun 2003 CA
2909804 Nov 2014 CA
101986787 Mar 2011 CN
102459900 May 2012 CN
102591512 Jul 2012 CN
103797379 May 2014 CN
103984414 Aug 2014 CN
107340871 Nov 2017 CN
107407969 Nov 2017 CN
107534810 Jan 2018 CN
0057594 Aug 1982 EP
309003 Mar 1989 EP
0696670 Feb 1996 EP
1875081 Jan 2008 EP
1911530 Apr 2008 EP
2271129 Jan 2011 EP
1461598 Apr 2014 EP
3207817 Aug 2017 EP
3216231 Aug 2019 EP
3916525 Dec 2021 EP
2464117 Apr 2010 GB
2513884 Nov 2014 GB
2513884 Nov 2014 GB
2530036 Mar 2016 GB
2008074075 Apr 2008 JP
2010109579 May 2010 JP
2011172074 Sep 2011 JP
2012048378 Mar 2012 JP
2012048378 Mar 2012 JP
5477736 Apr 2014 JP
2015035657 Feb 2015 JP
2016035646 Mar 2016 JP
2017168086 Sep 2017 JP
6239796 Nov 2017 JP
20120065779 Jun 2012 KR
20130055972 May 2013 KR
1020130055972 May 2013 KR
20160008280 Jan 2016 KR
20200082449 Jul 2020 KR
9118486 Nov 1991 WO
9639754 Dec 1996 WO
03050511 Jun 2003 WO
2005017965 Feb 2005 WO
2007144801 Dec 2007 WO
2009071746 Jun 2009 WO
2009112866 Sep 2009 WO
2010003836 Jan 2010 WO
2010139916 Dec 2010 WO
2011132012 Oct 2011 WO
2012023864 Feb 2012 WO
2012104648 Aug 2012 WO
2013179179 Dec 2013 WO
2014181084 Nov 2014 WO
2015006467 Jan 2015 WO
2015039622 Mar 2015 WO
2015127335 Aug 2015 WO
2015194510 Dec 2015 WO
2016007920 Jan 2016 WO
2016073936 May 2016 WO
2016095033 Jun 2016 WO
2016099279 Jun 2016 WO
2016132141 Aug 2016 WO
2016132144 Aug 2016 WO
2016137675 Sep 2016 WO
2016162058 Oct 2016 WO
2017172006 Oct 2017 WO
2018109466 Jun 2018 WO
2020049321 Mar 2020 WO
2021130505 Jul 2021 WO
2021260373 Dec 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (357)
Entry
Young et al. “Designing Mid-Air Haptic Gesture Controlled User Interfaces for Cars”, Proceedings of the ACM On Human-Computer Interaction, ACM PUB2Z7, New York, NY, USA, vol. 4, No. EICS, Jun. 18, 2020 (2020-96-18), pp. 1-23.
Almusawi et al., “A new artificial neural network approach in solving inverse kinematics of robotic arm (denso vp6242).” Computational intelligence and neuroscience 2016 (2016). (Year: 2016).
Azad et al., Deep domain adaptation under deep label scarcity. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1809.08097 (2018) (Year: 2018).
Beranek, L., & Mellow, T. (2019). Acoustics: Sound Fields, Transducers and Vibration. Academic Press.
Boureau et al.,“A theoretical analysis of feature pooling in visual recognition.” In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), pp. 111-118. 2010. (Year: 2010).
Bybi, A., Grondel, S., Mzerd, A., Granger, C., Garoum, M., & Assaad, J. (2019). Investigation of cross-coupling in piezoelectric transducer arrays and correction. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation, 9(4), 287.
Certon, D., Felix, N., Hue, P. T. H., Patat, F., & Lethiecq, M. (Oct. 1999). Evaluation of laser probe performances for measuring cross-coupling in 1-3 piezocomposite arrays. In 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. International Symposium (Cat. No. 99CH37027) (vol. 2, pp. 1091-1094).
Certon, D., Felix, N., Lacaze, E., Teston, F., & Patat, F. (2001). Investigation of cross-coupling in 1-3 piezocomposite arrays. ieee transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 48(1), 85-92.
Chang Suk Lee et al., An electrically switchable visible to infra-red dual frequency cholesteric liquid crystal light shutter. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2018, 6, 4243 (7 pages).
Der et al., Inverse kinematics for reduced deformable models. ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG) 25, No. 3 (2006): 1174-1179. (Year: 2006).
DeSilets, C. S. (1978). Transducer arrays suitable for acoustic imaging (No. GL-2833). Stanford Univ CA Edward L Ginzton Lab of Physics.
Duka, “Neural network based inverse kinematics solution for trajectory tracking of a robotic arm.” Procedia Technology 12 (2014) 20-27. (Year: 2014).
Henneberg, J., Gerlach, A., Storck, H., Cebulla, H., & Marburg, S. (2018). Reducing mechanical cross-coupling in phased array transducers using stop band material as backing. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 424, 352-364.
https://radiopaedia.org/articles/physical-principles-of-ultrasound-1?lang=GB (Accessed May 29, 2022).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated May 25, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/843,281 (pp. 1-28).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jun. 9, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/080,840 (pp. 1-9).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jun. 27, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,959 (pp. 1-17).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jun. 27, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/734,479 (pp. 1-13).
Oikonomidis et al., “Efficient model-based 3D tracking of hand articulations using Kinect.” In BmVC, vol. 1, No. 2, p. 3. 2011. (Year: 2011).
Patricio Rodrigues, E., Francisco de Oliveira, T., Yassunori Matuda, M., & Buiochi, F. (Sep. 2019). Design and Construction of a 2-D Phased Array Ultrasonic Transducer for Coupling in Water. In INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings (vol. 259, No. 4, pp. 5720-5731). Institute of Noise Control Engineering.
Seo et al., “Improved numerical inverse kinematics for human pose estimation,” Opt. Eng. 50(3 037001 (Mar. 1, 2011) https:// doi.org/10.1117/1.3549255 (Year: 2011).
Walter, S., Nieweglowski, K., Rebenklau, L., Wolter, K. J., Lamek, B., Schubert, F., . . . & Meyendorf, N. (May 2008). Manufacturing and electrical interconnection of piezoelectric 1-3 composite materials for phased array ultrasonic transducers. In 2008 31st International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (pp. 255-260).
Wang et al., Few-shot adaptive faster r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7173-7182. 2019. (Year: 2019).
Al-Mashhadany, “Inverse Kinematics Problem (IKP) of 6-DOF Manipulator By Locally Recurrent Neural Networks (LRNNs),” Management and Service Science (MASS), International Conference on Management and Service Science., IEEE, Aug. 24, 2010, 5 pages. (Year: 2010).
Guez, “Solution to the inverse kinematic problem in robotics by neural networks.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Neural Networks, 1988. San Diego, California. (Year: 1988) 8 pages.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT/GB2022/051821 (dated Oct. 20, 2022), 15 pages.
Mahboob, “Artificial neural networks for learning inverse kinematics of humanoid robot arms.” MS Thesis, 2015. (Year: 2015) 95 pages.
Office Action (Ex Parte Quayle Action) dated Jan. 6, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/195,795 (pp. 1-6).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Jan. 9, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/144,474 (pp. 1-16).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Nov. 18, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,767 (pp. 1-27).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Nov. 18, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,831 (pp. 1-9).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Dec. 8, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/229,091 (pp. 1-9).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Dec. 15, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/843,281 (pp. 1-25).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Oct. 17, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/807,730 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Nov. 9, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/454,823 (pp. 1-16).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Nov. 16, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/134,505 (pp. 1-7).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Nov. 16, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/692,852 (pp. 1-4).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Dec. 6, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/409,783 (pp. 1-7).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Dec. 22, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/457,663 (pp. 1-20).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Oct. 31, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,834 (pp. 1-2).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Oct. 31, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/176,899 (pp. 1-2).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Nov. 1, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,660 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Nov. 2, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/734,479 (pp. 1-2).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Nov. 10, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,959 (pp. 1-2).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Nov. 16, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,660 (pp. 1-2).
“Welcome to Project Soli” video, https://atap.google.com/#project-soli Accessed Nov. 30, 2018, 2 pages.
A. B. Vallbo, Receptive field characteristics of tactile units with myelinated afferents in hairy skin of human subjects, Journal of Physiology (1995), 483.3, pp. 783-795.
A. Sand, Head-Mounted Display with Mid-Air Tactile Feedback, Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Nov. 13-15, 2015 (8 pages).
Alexander, J. et al. (2011), Adding Haptic Feedback to Mobile TV (6 pages).
Amanda Zimmerman, The gentle touch receptors of mammalian skin, Science, Nov. 21, 2014, vol. 346 Issue 6212, p. 950.
Aoki et al., Sound location of stero reproduction with parametric loudspeakers, Applied Acoustics 73 (2012) 1289-1295 (7 pages).
Ashish Shrivastava et al., Learning from Simulated and Unsupervised Images through Adversarial Training, Jul. 19, 2017, pp. 1-16.
Bajard et al., Bkm: A New Hardware Algorithm for Complex Elementary Functions, 8092 IEEE Transactions on Computers 43 (1994) (9 pages).
Bajard et al., Evaluation of Complex Elementary Functions / A New Version of BKM, SPIE Conference on Advanced Signal Processing, Jul. 1999 (8 pages).
Benjamin Long et al., “Rendering volumetric haptic shapes in mid-air using ultrasound”, Acm Transactions On Graphics (TPG), ACM, US, (20141119), vol. 33, No. 6, ISSN 0730-0301, pp. 1-10.
Bortoff et al., Pseudolinearization of the Acrobot using Spline Functions, IEEE Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Decision and Control, Sep. 10, 1992 (6 pages).
Bożena Smagowska & Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska (2013) Effects of Ultrasonic Noise on the Human Body—A Bibliographic Review, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 19:2, 195-202.
Brian Kappus and Ben Long, Spatiotemporal Modulation for Mid-Air Haptic Feedback from an Ultrasonic Phased Array, ICSV25, Hiroshima, Jul. 8-12, 2018, 6 pages.
Canada Application 2,909,804 Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2019, 4 pages.
Casper et al., Realtime Control of Multiple-focus Phased Array Heating Patterns Based on Noninvasive Ultrasound Thermography, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. Jan. 2012; 59(1): 95-105.
Christoper M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, 2006, pp. 1-758.
Colgan, A., “How Does the Leap Motion Controller Work?” Leap Motion, Aug. 9, 2014, 10 pages.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 9, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,851 (pp. 1-6).
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jan. 14, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,804 (pp. 1-2).
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 21, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/966,213 (2 pages).
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 31, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/623,516 (pp. 1-2).
Damn Geeky, “Virtual projection keyboard technology with haptic feedback on palm of your hand,” May 30, 2013, 4 pages.
David Joseph Tan et al., Fits like a Glove: Rapid and Reliable Hand Shape Personalization, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5610-5619.
Definition of “Interferometry”according to Wikipedia, 25 pages., Retrieved Nov. 2018.
Definition of “Multilateration” according to Wikipedia, 7 pages., Retrieved Nov. 2018.
Definition of “Trilateration”according to Wikipedia, 2 pages., Retrieved Nov. 2018.
Diederik P. Kingma et al., Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, Jan. 30, 2017, pp. 1-15.
E. Bok, Metasurface for Water-to-Air Sound Transmission, Physical Review Letters 120, 044302 (2018) (6 pages).
E.S. Ebbini et al. (1991), A spherical-section ultrasound phased array applicator for deep localized hyperthermia, Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on (vol. 38 Issue: 7), pp. 634-643.
EPO Office Action for EP16708440.9 dated Sep. 12, 2018 (7 pages).
EPSRC Grant summary EP/J004448/1 (2011) (1 page).
Eric Tzeng et al., Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptation, Feb. 17, 2017, pp. 1-10.
European Office Action for Application No. EP16750992.6, dated Oct. 2, 2019, 3 pages.
Ex Parte Quayle Action dated Dec. 28, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/966,213 (pp. 1-7).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19169929.7, dated Aug. 6, 2019, 7 pages.
Freeman et al., Tactile Feedback for Above-Device Gesture Interfaces: Adding Touch to Touchless Interactions ICMI'14, Nov. 12-16, 2014, Istanbul, Turkey (8 pages).
Gavrilov L R et al.(2000) “A theoretical assessment of the relative performance of spherical phased arrays for ultrasound surgery” Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on (vol. 47, Issue: 1), pp. 125-139.
Gavrilov, L.R. (2008) “The Possibility of Generating Focal Regions of Complex Configurations in Application to the Problems of Stimulation of Human Receptor Structures by Focused Ultrasound” Acoustical Physics, vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 269-278.
Georgiou et al., Haptic In-Vehicle Gesture Controls, Adjunct Proceedings of the 9th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '17), Sep. 24-27, 2017 (6 pages).
GitHub—danfis/libccd: Library for collision detection between two convex shapes, Mar. 26, 2020, pp. 1-6.
GitHub—IntelRealSense/hand_tracking_samples: researc codebase for depth-based hand pose estimation using dynamics based tracking and CNNs, Mar. 26, 2020, 3 pages.
Gokturk, et al., “A Time-of-Flight Depth Sensor-System Description, Issues and Solutions,” Published in: 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, Date of Conference: Jun. 27-Jul. 2, 2004, 9 pages.
Hasegawa, K. and Shinoda, H. (2013) “Aerial Display of Vibrotactile Sensation with High Spatial-Temporal Resolution using Large Aperture Airbourne Ultrasound Phased Array”, University of Tokyo (6 pages).
Henrik Bruus, Acoustofluidics 2: Perturbation theory and ultrasound resonance modes, Lab Chip, 2012, 12, 20-28.
Hilleges et al. Interactions in the air: adding further depth to interactive tabletops, UIST '09: Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyOct. 2009 pp. 139-148.
Hoshi et al., Tactile Presentation by Airborne Ultrasonic Oscillator Array, Proceedings of Robotics and Mechatronics Lecture 2009, Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers; May 24, 2009 (5 pages).
Hoshi T et al., “Noncontact Tactile Display Based on Radiation Pressure of Airborne Ultrasound”, IEEE Transactions On Haptics, IEEE, USA, (Jul. 1, 2010), vol. 3, No. 3, ISSN 1939-1412, pp. 155-165.
Hoshi, T., Development of Aerial-Input and Aerial-Tactile-Feedback System, IEEE World Haptics Conference 2011, p. 569-573.
Hoshi, T., Handwriting Transmission System Using Noncontact Tactile Display, IEEE Haptics Symposium 2012 pp. 399-401.
Hoshi, T., Non-contact Tactile Sensation Synthesized by Ultrasound Transducers, Third Joint Euro haptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2009 (5 pages).
Hoshi, T., Touchable Holography, SIGGRAPH 2009, New Orleans, Louisiana, Aug. 3-7, 2009. (1 page).
Hua J, Qin H., Haptics-based dynamic implicit solid modeling, IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. Sep.-Oct. 2004;10(5):574-86.
Hyunjae Gil, Whiskers: Exploring the Use of Ultrasonic Haptic Cues on the Face, CHI 2018, Apr. 21- 26, 2018, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Iddan, et al., “3D Imaging in the Studio (And Elsewhwere . . . ” Apr. 2001, 3DV systems Ltd., Yokneam, Isreal, www.3dvsystems.com.il, 9 pages.
Imaginary Phone: Learning Imaginary Interfaces By Transferring Spatial Memory From a Familiar Device Sean Gustafson, Christian Holz and Patrick Baudisch. UIST 2011. (10 pages).
India Morrison, The skin as a social organ, Exp Brain Res (2010) 204:305-314.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT/ US2017/035009, dated Dec. 4, 2018, 8 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2017/069569 dated Feb. 5, 2019, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB2018/053738, dated Apr. 11, 2019, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB2018/053739, dated Jun. 4, 2019, 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB2019/050969, dated Jun. 13, 2019, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB2019/051223, dated Aug. 8, 2019, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB2019/052510, dated Jan. 14, 2020, 25 pages.
ISR & WO for PCT/GB2020/052545 (dated Jan. 27, 2021) 14 pages.
ISR and WO for PCT/GB2020/050013 (dated Jul. 13, 2020) (20 pages).
ISR and WO for PCT/GB2020/050926 (dated Jun. 2, 2020) (16 pages).
ISR and WO for PCT/GB2020/052544 (dated Dec. 18, 2020) (14 pages).
ISR for PCT/GB2020/052546 (dated Feb. 23, 2021) (14 pages).
ISR for PCT/GB2020/053373 (dated Mar. 26, 2021) (16 pages).
Iwamoto et al. (2008), Non-contact Method for Producing Tactile Sensation Using Airborne Ultrasound, EuroHaptics, pp. 504-513.
Iwamoto et al., Airborne Ultrasound Tactile Display: Supplement, The University of Tokyo 2008 (2 pages).
Iwamoto T et al., “Two-dimensional Scanning Tactile Display using Ultrasound Radiation Pressure”, Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2006 14th Symposium On Alexandria, VA, USA Mar. 25-26, 2006, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, (20060325), ISBN 978-1-4244-0226-7, pp. 57-61.
Jager et al., “Air-Coupled 40-KHZ Ultrasonic 2D-Phased Array Based on a 3D-Printed Waveguide Structure”, 2017 IEEE, 4 pages.
Japanese Office Action (with English language translation) for Application No. 2017-514569, dated Mar. 31, 2019, 10 pages.
JonasChatel-Goldman, Touch increases autonomic coupling between romantic partners, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Mar. 2014, vol. 8, Article 95.
Jonathan Taylor et al., Articulated Distance Fields for Ultra-Fast Tracking of Hands Interacting, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 36, No. 4, Article 244, Publication Date: Nov. 2017, pp. 1-12.
Jonathan Taylor et al., Efficient and Precise Interactive Hand Tracking Through Joint, Continuous Optimization of Pose and Correspondences, SIGGRAPH '16 Technical Paper, Jul. 24-28, 2016, Anaheim, CA, ISBN: 978-1-4503-4279-87/16/07, pp. 1-12.
Jonathan Tompson et al., Real-Time Continuous Pose Recovery of Human Hands Using Convolutional Networks, ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 5, Article 169, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-10.
K. Jia, Dynamic properties of micro-particles in ultrasonic transportation using phase-controlled standing waves, J. Applied Physics 116, n. 16 (2014) (12 pages).
Kai Tsumoto, Presentation of Tactile Pleasantness Using Airborne Ultrasound, 2021 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC) Jul. 6-9, 2021. Montreal, Canada.
Kaiming He et al., Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, http://image-net.org/challenges/ LSVRC/2015/ and http://mscoco.org/dataset/#detections-challenge2015, Dec. 10, 2015, pp. 1-12.
Kamakura, T. and Aoki, K. (2006) “A Highly Directional Audio System using a Parametric Array in Air” WESPAC IX 2006 (8 pages).
Keisuke Hasegawa, Electronically steerable ultrasound-driven long narrow air stream, Applied Physics Letters 111, 064104 (2017).
Keisuke Hasegawa, Midair Ultrasound Fragrance Rendering, IEEE Transactions On Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 24, No. 4, Apr. 2018 1477.
Keisuke Hasegawa,,Curved acceleration path of ultrasound-driven air flow, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 054902 (2019).
Kolb, et al., “Time-of-Flight Cameras in Computer Graphics,” Computer Graphics forum, vol. 29 (2010), No. 1, pp. 141-159.
Konstantinos Bousmalis et al., Domain Separation Networks, 29th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016), Barcelona, Spain. Aug. 22, 2016, pp. 1-15.
Krim, et al., “Two Decades of Array Signal Processing Research—The Parametric Approach”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Jul. 1996, pp. 67-94.
Lang, Robert, “3D Time-of-Flight Distance Measurement with Custom Solid-State Image Sensors in CMOS/CCD-Technology”, A dissertation submitted to Department of EE and CS at Univ. of Siegen, dated Jun. 28, 2000, 223 pages.
Large et al.,Feel the noise: Mid-air ultrasound haptics as a novel human-vehicle interaction paradigm, Applied Ergonomics (2019) (10 pages).
Li, Larry, “Time-of-Flight Camera—An Introduction,” Texas Instruments, Technical White Paper, SLOA190B—Jan. 2014 Revised May 2014, 10 pages.
Light, E.D., Progress in Two Dimensional Arrays for Real Time Volumetric Imaging, 1998 (17 pages).
Line S Loken, Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans, Nature Neuroscience vol. 12 [ No. 5 [ May 2009 547.
M. Barmatz et al, “Acoustic radiation potential on a sphere in plane, cylindrical, and spherical standing wave fields”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, New York, NY, US, (Mar. 1, 1985), vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 928-945, XP055389249.
M. Toda, New Type of Matching Layer for Air-Coupled Ultrasonic Transducers, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelecthcs, and Frequency Control, vol. 49, No. 7, Jul. 2002 (8 pages).
Mahdi Rad et al., Feature Mapping for Learning Fast and Accurate 3D Pose Inference from Synthetic Images, Mar. 26, 2018, pp. 1-14.
Marco A B Andrade et al., “Matrix method for acoustic levitation simulation”, IEEE Transactions On Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE, US, (Aug. 1, 2011), vol. 58, No. 8, ISSN 0885-3010, pp. 1674-1683.
Mariana von Mohr, The soothing function of touch: affective touch reduces feelings of social exclusion, Scientific Reports, 7: 13516, Oct. 18, 2017.
Marin, About LibHand, LibHand—A Hand Articulation Library, www.libhand.org/index.html, Mar. 26, 2020, pp. 1-2; www.libhand.org/download.html, 1 page; www.libhand.org/examples.html, pp. 1-2.
Markus Oberweger et al., DeepPrior++: Improving Fast and Accurate 3D Hand Pose Estimation, Aug. 28, 2017, pp. 1-10.
Markus Oberweger et al., Hands Deep in Deep Learning for Hand Pose Estimation, Dec. 2, 2016, pp. 1-10.
Marshall, M ., Carter, T., Alexander, J., & Subramanian, S. (2012). Ultratangibles: creating movable tangible objects on interactive tables. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 2185-2188).
Marzo et al., Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects, Nature Communications Doi: 10.1038/ncomms9661 (2015) (7 pages).
Meijster, A., et al., “A General Algorithm for Computing Distance Transforms in Linear Time,” Mathematical Morphology and its Applications to Image and Signal Processing, 2002, pp. 331-340.
Mingzhu Lu et al. (2006) Design and experiment of 256-element ultrasound phased array for noninvasive focused ultrasound surgery, Ultrasonics, vol. 44, Supplement, Dec. 22, 2006, pp. e325-e330.
Mitsuru Nakajima, Remotely Displaying Cooling Sensation via Ultrasound-Driven Air Flow, Haptics Symposium 2018, San Francisco, USA p. 340.
Mohamed Yacine Tsalamlal, Affective Communication through Air Jet Stimulation: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2018.
Mueller, GANerated Hands for Real-Time 3D Hand Tracking from Monocular RGB, Eye in-Painting with Exemplar Generative Adverserial Networks, pp. 49-59 (Jun. 1, 2018).
Nina Gaissert, Christian Wallraven, and Heinrich H. Bulthoff, “Visual and Haptic Perceptual Spaces Show High Similarity in Humans ”, published to Journal of Vision in 2010, available at http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/11/2 and retrieved on Apr. 22, 2020 ( Year: 2010), 20 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 20, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,608 (pp. 1-5).
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 22, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/671,107 (pp. 1-5).
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 19, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/665,629 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 21, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/983,864 (pp. 1-7).
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 10, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,862 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 7, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/851,214 (pp. 1-7).
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 22, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,500 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/851,214 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/296,127 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 10, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/092,333 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 17, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/210,661 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 25, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,851 (pp. 1-10).
Notice of Allowance dated May 30, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/966,213 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 1, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,804 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 16, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,695 (pp. 1-7).
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 30, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/839,184 (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/699,629 (pp. 1-8).
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 30, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/401,148 (pp. 1-10).
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 15/210,661 dated Jun. 17, 2020 (22 pages).
Obrist et al., Emotions Mediated Through Mid-Air Haptics, CHI 2015, Apr. 18-23, 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (10 pages).
Obrist et al., Talking about Tactile Experiences, CHI 2013, Apr. 27-May 2, 2013 (10 pages).
Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,959 (pp. 1-17).
Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/839,184 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/401,148 (pp. 1-15).
Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/296,127 (pp. 1-6).
Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,851 (pp. 1-12).
Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/374,301 (pp. 1-18).
Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,804 (pp. 1-10).
Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/564,016 (pp. 1-14).
Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/170,841 (pp. 1-9).
Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,862 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,825 (pp. 1-9).
Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/959,266 (pp. 1-15).
Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,608 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/623,516 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/960,113 (pp. 1-7).
Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,695 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,767 (pp. 1-6).
Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,959 (p. 1-6).
Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/210,661 (pp. 1-12).
Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/159,695 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,760 (pp. 1-17).
Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/699,629 (pp. 1-12).
Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,767 (pp. 1-27).
Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/899,720 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,767 (pp. 1-23).
Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/210,661 (pp. 1-10).
Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,760 (pp. 1-21).
Office Action dated May 13, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,500 (pp. 1-9).
Office Action dated May 14, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,959 (pp. 1-6).
Office Action dated May 16, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,851 (pp. 1-7).
Office Action dated May 18, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/960,113 (pp. 1-21).
Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,804 (pp. 1-10).
Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/671,107 (pp. 1-6).
Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,851 (pp. 1-9).
Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,496 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,851 (pp. 1-14).
Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,959 (pp. 1-17).
Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/080,840 (pp. 1-9).
OGRECave/ogre—GitHub: ogre/Samples/Media/materials at 7de80a7483f20b50f2b10d7ac6de9d9c6c87d364, Mar. 26, 2020, 1 page.
Optimal regularisation for acoustic source reconstruction by inverse methods, Y. Kim, P.A. Nelson, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK Received Feb. 25, 2003; 25 pages.
Oscar Martínez-Graullera et al., “2D array design based on Fermat spiral for ultrasound imaging”, ULTRASONICS, (Feb. 1, 2010), vol. 50, No. 2, ISSN 0041-624X, pp. 280-289, XP055210119.
Partial International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB2018/053735, dated Apr. 12, 2019, 14 pages.
Partial ISR for Application No. PCT/GB2020/050013 dated May 19, 2020 (16 pages).
PCT Partial International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB2018/053404 dated Feb. 25, 2019, 13 pages.
Péter Tamás Kovács et al., “Tangible Holographic 3D Objects with Virtual Touch”, Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces, ACM, 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701 New York NY 10121-0701 USA, (Nov. 15, 2015), ISBN 978-1-4503-3899-8, pp. 319-324.
Phys.org, Touchable Hologram Becomes Reality, Aug. 6, 2009, by Lisa Zyga (2 pages).
Pompei, F.J. (2002), “Sound from Ultrasound: The Parametric Array as an Audible Sound Source”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (132 pages).
Rocchesso et al., Accessing and Selecting Menu Items by In-Air Touch, ACM CHItaly'19, Sep. 23-25, 2019, Padova, Italy (9 pages).
Rochelle Ackerley, Human C-Tactile Afferents Are Tuned to the Temperature of a Skin-Stroking Caress, J. Neurosci., Feb. 19, 2014, 34(8):2879-2883.
Ryoko Takahashi, Tactile Stimulation by Repetitive Lateral Movement of Midair Ultrasound Focus, Journal of Latex Class Files, vol. 14, No. 8, Aug. 2015.
Schmidt, Ralph, “Multiple Emitter Location and Signal Parameter Estimation” IEEE Transactions of Antenna and Propagation, vol. AP-34, No. 3, Mar. 1986, pp. 276-280.
Sean Gustafson et al., “Imaginary Phone”, Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Techology: Oct. 16-19, 2011, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, ACM, New York, NY, Oct. 16, 2011, pp. 283-292, XP058006125, DOI: 10.1145/2047196.2047233, ISBN: 978-1-4503-0716-1.
Search report and Written Opinion of ISA for PCT/GB2015/050417 dated Jul. 8, 2016 (20 pages).
Search report and Written Opinion of ISA for PCT/GB2015/050421 dated Jul. 8, 2016 (15 pages).
Search report and Written Opinion of ISA for PCT/GB2017/050012 dated Jun. 8, 2017. (18 pages).
Search Report by EPO for EP 17748466 dated Jan. 13, 2021 (16 pages).
Search Report for GB1308274.8 dated Nov. 11, 2013. (2 pages).
Search Report for GB1415923.0 dated Mar. 11, 2015. (1 page).
Search Report for PCT/GB/2017/053729 dated Mar. 15, 2018 (16 pages).
Search Report for PCT/GB/2017/053880 dated Mar. 21, 2018. (13 pages).
Search report for PCT/GB2014/051319 dated Dec. 8, 2014 (4 pages).
Search report for PCT/GB2015/052507 dated Mar. 11, 2020 (19 pages).
Search report for PCT/GB2015/052578 dated Oct. 26, 2015 (12 pages).
Search report for PCT/GB2015/052916 dated Feb. 26, 2020 (18 pages).
Search Report for PCT/GB2017/052332 dated Oct. 10, 2017 (12 pages).
Search report for PCT/GB2018/051061 dated Sep. 26, 2018 (17 pages).
Search report for PCT/US2018/028966 dated Jul. 13, 2018 (43 pages).
Sergey Ioffe et al., Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariat Shift, Mar. 2, 2015, pp. 1-11.
Seungryul, Pushing the Envelope for RGB-based Dense 3D Hand Pose Estimation for RGB-based Desne 3D Hand Pose Estimation via Neural Rendering, arXiv:1904.04196v2 [cs.CV] Apr. 9, 2019 (5 pages).
Shakeri, G., Williamson, J. H. and Brewster, S. (2018) May the Force Be with You: Ultrasound Haptic Feedback for Mid-Air Gesture Interaction in Cars. In: 10th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 2018) (11 pages).
Shanxin Yuan et al., BigHand2.2M Bechmark: Hand Pose Dataset and State of the Art Analysis, Dec. 9, 2017, pp. 1-9.
Shome Subhra Das, Detectioin of Self Intersection in Synthetic Hand Pose Generators, 2017 Fifteenth IAPR International Conference on Machine Vision Applications (MVA), Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan, May 8-12, 2017, pp. 354-357.
Sixth Sense webpage, http://www.pranavmistry.com/projects/sixthsense/ Accessed Nov. 30, 2018, 7 pages.
Stan Melax et al., Dynamics Based 3D Skeletal Hand Tracking, May 22, 2017, pp. 1-8.
Stanley J. Bolanowski, Hairy Skin: Psychophysical Channels and Their Physiological Substrates, Somatosensory and Motor Research, vol. 11. No. 3, 1994, pp. 279-290.
Stefan G. Lechner, Hairy Sensation, PHYSIOLOGY 28: 142-150, 2013.
Steve Guest et al., “Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception”, Exp. Brain Res (2002) 146:161-171, DOI 10.1007/s00221-002-1164-z, Received: Feb. 9, 2002/Accepted: May 16, 2002/ Published online: Jul. 26, 2002, Springer-Verlag 2002, (11 pages).
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 28, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/563,608 (pp. 1-2).
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 28, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/092,333 (pp. 1-2).
Sylvia Gebhardt, Ultrasonic Transducer Arrays for Particle Manipulation (date unknown) (2 pages).
Takaaki Kamigaki, Noncontact Thermal and Vibrotactile Display Using Focused Airborne Ultrasound, EuroHaptics 2020, LNCS 12272, pp. 271-278, 2020.
Takahashi Dean: “Ultrahaptics shows off sense of touch in virtual reality”, Dec. 10, 2016 (Dec. 10, 2016), XP055556416, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://venturebeat.com/2016/12/10/ultrahaptics-shows-off-sense-of-touch-in-virtual-reality/ [retrieved on Feb. 13, 2019] 4 pages.
Takahashi, M. et al., Large Aperture Airborne Ultrasound Tactile Display Using Distributed Array Units, SICE Annual Conference 2010 p. 359-62.
Takayuki et al., “Noncontact Tactile Display Based on Radiation Pressure of Airborne Ultrasound” IEEE Transactions on Haptics vol. 3, No. 3, p. 165 (2010).
Teixeira, et al., “A brief introduction to Microsoft's Kinect Sensor,” Kinect, 26 pages, retrieved Nov. 2018.
Toby Sharp et al., Accurate, Robust, and Flexible Real-time Hand Tracking, CHI '15, Apr. 18-23, 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea, ACM 978-1-4503-3145-6/15/04, pp. 1-10.
Tom Carter et al, “UltraHaptics: Multi-Point Mid-Air Haptic Feedback for Touch Surfaces”, Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium On User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '13, New York, New York, USA, (Jan. 1, 2013), ISBN 978-1-45-032268-3, pp. 505-514.
Tom Nelligan and Dan Kass, Intro to Ultrasonic Phased Array (date unknown) (8 pages).
Tomoo Kamakura, Acoustic streaming induced in focused Gaussian beams, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 (5), Pt. 1, May 1995 p. 2740.
Uta Sailer, How Sensory and Affective Attributes Describe Touch Targeting C-Tactile Fibers, Experimental Psychology (2020), 67(4), 224-236.
Vincent Lepetit et al., Model Based Augmentation and Testing of an Annotated Hand Pose Dataset, ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307910344, Sep. 2016, 13 pages.
Wang et al., Device-Free Gesture Tracking Using Acoustic Signals, ACM MobiCom '16, pp. 82-94 (13 pages).
Wilson et al., Perception of Ultrasonic Haptic Feedback on the Hand: Localisation and Apparent Motion, CHI 2014, Apr. 26-May 1, 2014, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (10 pages).
Wooh et al., “Optimum beam steering of linear phased arays,” Wave Motion 29 (1999) pp. 245-265, 21 pages.
Xin Cheng et al., “Computation of the acoustic radiation force on a sphere based on the 3-D FDTD method”, Piezoelectricity, Acoustic Waves and Device Applications (SPAWDA), 2010 Symposium On, IEEE, (Dec. 10, 2010), ISBN 978-1-4244-9822-2, pp. 236-239.
Xu Hongyi et al, “6-DoF Haptic Rendering Using Continuous Collision Detection between Points and Signed Distance Fields”, IEEE Transactions On Haptics, IEEE, USA, vol. 10, No. 2, ISSN 1939-1412, (Sep. 27, 2016), pp. 151-161, (Jun. 16, 2017).
Yang Ling et al., “Phase-coded approach for controllable generation of acoustical vortices”, Journal of Applied Physics, American Institute of Physics, US, vol. 113, No. 15, ISSN 0021-8979, (Apr. 21, 2013), pp. 154904-154904.
Yarin Gal et al., Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning, Oct. 4, 2016, pp. 1-12, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, NY, USA, 2016, JMLR: W&CP vol. 48.
Yaroslav Ganin et al., Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks, Journal of Machine Learning Research 17 (2016) 1-35, submitted May 2015; published Apr. 2016.
Yaroslav Ganin et al., Unsupervised Domain Adaptataion by Backpropagation, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Moscow Region, Russia, Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France, 2015, JMLR: W&CP vol. 37, copyright 2015 by the author(s), 11 pages.
Yoshino, K. and Shinoda, H. (2013), “Visio Acoustic Screen for Contactless Touch Interface with Tactile Sensation”, University of Tokyo (5 pages).
Zeng, Wejun, “Microsoft Kinect Sensor and Its Effect,” IEEE Multimedia, Apr.-Jun. 2012, 7 pages.
ISR & WO for PCT/GB2022/051388 (dated Aug. 30, 2022) (15 pages).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Sep. 16, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,660 (pp. 1-6).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Aug. 29, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/995,819 (pp. 1-6).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Sep. 21, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/721,315 (pp. 1-10).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Aug. 24, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,959 (pp. 1-6).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Aug. 31, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,959 (pp. 1-2).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Sep. 7, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,834 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Sep. 8, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/176,899 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Sep. 12, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/734,479 (pp. 1-7).
EPO Examination Search Report 17 702 910.5 (dated Jun. 23, 2021).
Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,959 (pp. 1-7).
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 5, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/899,720 (pp. 1-9).
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Nov. 24, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,500 (pp. 1-5).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for App. No. PCT/GB2021/051590, dated Nov. 11, 2021, 20 pages.
Anonymous: “How does Ultrahaptics technology work?—Ultrahaptics Developer Information”, Jul. 31, 2018 (Jul. 31, 2018), XP055839320, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://developer.ultrahaptics.com/knowledgebase/haptics-overview/ [retrieved on Sep. 8, 2021].
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Dec. 14, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/170,841 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Dec. 20, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/195,795 (pp. 1-7).
EPO Application 18 725 358.8 Examination Report dated Sep. 22, 2021.
EPO 21186570.4 Extended Search Report dated Oct. 29, 2021.
Cappellari et al., “Identifying Electromyography Sensor Placement using Dense Neural Networks.” In DATA, pp. 130-141. 2018. ( Year: 2018).
ISR and WO for PCT/GB2023/050001 (dated May 24, 2023) (20 pages).
Montenegro et al., “Neural Network as an Alternative to the Jacobian for Iterative Solution to Inverse Kinematics,” 2018 Latin American Robotic Symposium, 2018 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR) and 2018 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE) João Pessoa, Brazil, 2018, pp. 333-338 (Year: 2018).
Nuttall, A. (Feb. 1981). Some windows with very good sidelobe behavior. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 8 pages.
Office Action (Ex Parte Quayle Action) dated Jul. 20, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/843,281 (pp. 1-15).
Office Action (Ex Parte Quayle Action) dated Sep. 18, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/066,267 (pp. 1-6).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Jul. 25, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/454,823 (pp. 1-17).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Aug. 30, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/564,016 (pp. 1-15).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Sep. 7, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/144,474 (pp. 1-16).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Jun. 16, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/354,636 (pp. 1-7).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Jul. 20, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/692,852 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Aug. 2, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/843,281 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Aug. 8, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/645,305 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Sep. 11, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/065,603 (pp. 1-11).
Oyama et al., “Inverse kinematics learning for robotic arms with fewer degrees of freedom by modular neural network systems,” 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Alta., 2005, pp. 1791-1798, doi: 10.1109/ IROS.2005.1545084. (Year: 2005).
Papoulis, A. (1977). Signal Analysis. The University of Michigan: McGraw-Hill, pp. 92-93.
Prabhu, K. M. (2013). Window Functions and Their Applications in Signal Processing . CRC Press., pp. 87-127.
Aksel Sveier et al., Pose Estimation with Dual Quaternions and Iterative Closest Point, 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC) (8 pages).
JP Office Action for JP 2020-534355 (dated Dec. 6, 2022) (8 pages).
Ken Wada, Ring Buffer Basics (2013) 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 23, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/060,556 (pp. 1-10).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Mar. 21, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/995,819 (pp. 1-7).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Mar. 1, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/564,016 (pp. 1-10).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Mar. 22, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/354,636 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Apr. 19, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/066,267 (pp. 1-11).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Apr. 27, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/229,091 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated May 8, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/065,603 (pp. 1-17).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Mar. 8, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/721,315 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Mar. 15, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/134,505 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Mar. 24, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/080,840 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Apr. 4, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/409,783 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85) dated Apr. 6, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/807,730 (pp. 1-7).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Apr. 28, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/195,795 (pp. 1-7).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated May 12, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/229,091 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated May 24, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/229,091 (pp. 1-2).
Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/060,556 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/060,525 (pp. 1-12).
Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/066,267 (pp. 1-11).
Partial ISR for PCT/GB2023/050001 (dated Mar. 31, 2023) 13 pages.
Rakkolainen et al., A Survey of Mid-Air Ultrasound Haptics and Its Applications (IEEE Transactions on Haptics), vol. 14, No. 1, 2021, 18 pages.
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Jan. 18, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/899,720 (pp. 1-2).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jan. 24, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,767 (pp. 1-22).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jan. 21, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,834 (pp. 1-12).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Feb. 11, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,760 (pp. 1-8).
ISR and WO for PCT/GB2020/052829 (dated Feb. 10, 2021) (15 pages).
EPO Examination Report 17 748 4656.4 (dated Jan. 12, 2021) (16 pages).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Feb. 28, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,825 (pp. 1-7).
Mohamed Yacine Tsalamlal, Non-Intrusive Haptic Interfaces: State-of-the Art Survey, HAID 2013, LNCS 7989, pp. 1-9, 2013.
EPO Communication for Application 18 811 906.9 (dated Nov. 29, 2021) (15 pages).
ISR and WO for PCT/GB2021/052415 (dated Dec. 22, 2021) (16 pages).
Gareth Young et al.. Designing Mid-Air Haptic Gesture Controlled User Interfaces for Cars, PACM on Human-Computer Interactions, Jun. 2020 (24 pages).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Mar. 4, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,660 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Mar. 7, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/600,496 (pp. 1-5).
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for EP 19723179.8 (dated Feb. 15, 2022).
EPO ISR and WO for PCT/GB2022/050204 (dated Apr. 7, 2022) (15 pages).
IN 202047026493 Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2022.
ISR & WO For PCT/GB2021/052946.
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Mar. 14, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/564,016 (pp. 1-12).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Mar. 15, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/144,474 (pp. 1-13).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Apr. 1, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/229,091 (pp. 1-10).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated May 2, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,831 (pp. 1-10).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220083142 A1 Mar 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63079708 Sep 2020 US