The invention relates to an ultrasonic imaging system and an ultrasonic examination apparatus having processing means for constructing and displaying an ultrasonic examination image sequence of an artery segment with indications of arterial parameters in function of the cardiac cycle The invention also relates to an image processing method having steps for operating this system and this apparatus. The invention is used in the field of ultrasonic imaging, to provide a cardio-vascular non-invasive medical tool for examining patients suspected to present anomalies of arteries and notably anomalies of the aorta such as aortic aneurysms.
An ultrasonic image processing method for calculating dilation curves related to an artery segment is already known from the patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,579,771 (Bonnefous, Dec. 3, 1996). This document describes a method for characterizing an artery segment by ultrasonic imaging, using an array of ultrasonic transducers that produces a sectional frame, which is formed by image lines of a number of successive parallel excitation lines extending perpendicularly to the artery axis. Said array is coupled to a transmitter/receiver circuit, which provides high frequency signals to a signal processing system. Said system determines the arterial walls radial velocity and displacement amplitude values and further determines an arterial dilation curve in function of location and time. Such a curve is constructed by points representing the arterial dilation value in the arterial radial direction Z, at a given location corresponding to an excitation line along the longitudinal X-axis of the artery, in function of excitation instants t, during a cardiac cycle. So,
The dilation curves are certainly very useful for the study of stenoses. A problem is that, in fact, for the study of aneurysms, the evaluation of distensibility is more exploitable by a cardiologist. The severity of an aneurysm may be estimated by considering its maximal diameter. Thus, the dilation information is useful. However, at the present time, cardiologists think that the mechanical stress acting on the artery walls at the location of the aneurysm is a very appropriate consideration. Thus, the distensibily information is a very appropriate consideration and is preferably used together with the dilation information.
Another problem is that the cited document relates to an image processing method based on image acquisition with ultrasound scanning lines that are perpendicular to the artery axis. This corresponds to the use of an ultrasound system for acquiring the ultrasound data with a linear array of transducer elements. This kind of system is appropriate for studying a shallow artery and a small segment of artery such as the carotid. This kind of system is not appropriate for the study of a deep and thick artery such as the aorta and particularly for the study of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA). For studying the aorta and AAA, a curved array of transducer elements is preferably used. When the ultrasound data are acquired with a curved array, then the method disclosed in the cited document for calculating artery dilations cannot be directly used, since the scanning lines are no longer perpendicular to the artery axis.
Another problem is that the cited document only permits of disposing of constant values corresponding to the reference coordinates of the artery walls at the instants of zero dilation. This corresponds to a representation of the artery wall by a straight reference line at the instants of zero dilation. Such a linear reference representation is difficult to understand for the clinician. Hence, there is a need for a precise location and representation of the artery walls at these instants of zero dilation.
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) is defined by a doubling of the normal infra-renal aortic diameter. In order to early diagnosing aneurysms in aorta, the medical field has a need for non-invasive means for providing aorta images together with clear quantified indications of the aortic distensibility, which is a measure that is used by clinicians together with dilation information.
In order to address the problem of finding new diagnosis information for the follow up of patients suspected to present Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAAs), it is an object of the invention to propose an image processing system for the evaluation of parameters related to the tension and strain of the aneurysm walls. The present invention-proposes a system developed for AAAs that is specifically designed to provide clinicians with information on the motion of the aorta artery walls.
This image processing system is claimed in claim 1. This image processing system offers the advantage that the aorta wall behavior is made clearly visible together with the parameters that are useful for the clinician in the study of these Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. This system has display means to visualize the images and constitutes a tool for non-invasive diagnostic of arterial wall anomalies. An ultrasonic diagnostic method having processing steps for operating this system and an ultrasound apparatus coupled to this system are claimed in dependent Claims.
Specific embodiments of the invention will be described in detail hereinafter with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings; therein:
Referring to
The severity of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAAs) is generally clinically estimated by considering its maximal diameter. However, referring to
The present invention proposes an image processing system and an image processing method to provide aorta parameters for the evaluation of the tension and strain of the aneurysms walls. The system and the method are developed for AAAs and are specifically designed to provide clinicians with information on the behavior of the aortic artery walls.
The method is first described. This method permits of evaluating automatically, or with limited user interaction, and at any time in the image sequence, the position of the artery walls, in order to estimate the artery dilations and distensibility.
Referring to
This Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Motion (AAAWM) tool particularly comprises:
1) Acquisition 21 of a sequence of ultrasound images of a segment of artery, for instance a segment of aorta, using a linear curved array. Said artery segment has a longitudinal axis and is represented in grayscale images as illustrated by
Referring to
2) Semi-automatic segmentation 22 of the artery walls, based on the echo information, in one image of the sequence. As illustrated by the block diagram of
3) Automatic rigid tracking 23 of the artery wall position in the rest of the sequence, as illustrated by
4) Additional processing 24 in order to measure the dilation and the distensibility of abdominal aorta with the ultrasound system using a linear curved array.
5) Output 25 of the parameters related to the artery under study as illustrated for example by the box of
The technical implementation of the above described steps for forming the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Motion (AAAWM) tool is described hereafter more precisely. The terms artery wall border and “structure” have the same meaning and represent a segmented object.
As disclosed by the prior art cited in the introduction part, it is already known to determine artery dilations using a linear probe applied to the carotid artery of a patient. The known method is no more appropriate for carrying out the present method, since the probe used for the examination of the aorta of a patient is curved. The aortic aneurysms have very varying shapes and sizes depending on the subject under examination. As a consequence, the detection of the walls (structures) in the images of a sequence requires a very adaptive segmentation tool. In order to deal with the variability of the images, it is preferable to combine user interaction with a more automatic processing for the segmentation of an image. Thus, the user is asked to delineate the boundaries of the AAA walls in one image of the sequence that he can select. This delineation is semi-automatic and is based on a technique called “Live-Wire”, which is described in a publication entitled “User-Steered Image Segmentation Paradigms: Live Wire and Live Lane” by A. X. Falcao, J. K. Udupa, S. Samarasekera, S. Sharma, and B. E. Hirsh, in “Graphical Models and Image Processing 60, pp. 233-260, 1998”. The principle of the method of the present invention is to provide the automatic detection of a boundary located between successive points selected by the user on this boundary. The boundary detection is based on the optimization of a cost function.
Implementation of Step 1: Acquisition of an Image Sequence.
As a matter of example, the processed sequence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has been acquired with a Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) modality, using a C5-2 probe and a Philips HDI5000 scanner.
Implementation of Step 2: Semi-Automatic Edge Detection in One Selected Frame.
Referring to
With the left click 41, if it is the first click: creation 42 of a new path structure; else: addition 43 of the temporary path to the path structure.
With the mouse move 44: Finding 45 the optimal path between the last left click and the current cursor position; or filling 46 a temporary path with the result.
With the right click 47: Addition 48 of the temporary path to the path structure; or finishing 49 the path.
A cost function is used to determine the optimal path between two successive positions of the mouse. The first position is always associated to a click of the user. The second position can either be the current position of the mouse or a click of the user. This allows to showing to the user in real-time where the optimal path is found by the path search technique. The cost of a path between two positions of the mouse is the sum of the costs of the individual pixels that constitute the path. Since the goal of the path search technique is to minimize the cost of a path, the costs of the individual pixels at boundary positions must be small. The individual costs are based on the gradient of the echo image. Since the echo image is rather noisy, it is first smoothed, using a gaussian filter, before the gradient estimation. The cost of a pixel is defined by the following formula:
where maxGrad and minGrad represent respectively the maximum and minimum amplitude of the gradient. The cost of individual pixels is calculated for each pixel of the image where the user interacts.
Implementation of Step 3: Structure Rigid Tracking in the Image Sequence S.
In fact, the aortic aneurysms do not considerably deform through an image sequence. As a first approximation, a rigid tracking of the motion, limited to translations, can be used to automatically detect the structures in the remainder of the sequence. The tracking is initialized with the result of the semi-automatic segmentation provided by the user in the initially selected frame of the sequence. The proximal and the distal walls, also called structures, are individually tracked in the whole sequence.
Referring to
Sub-steps 83, 84 of defining regions of interest, denoted by ROI, around each structure:
Referring to
In a sequence S, selection 91 of a starting Frame n in the image sequence 4 and drawing a path as previously described in reference to Step 2 illustrated by
Referring to
Evaluation 93 of the cost of the path at the current position in frame (n+1) as the sum of the potentials of each point of the path; in order to determine the best fit in the current frame, an optimization criterion is defined. This criterion is the minimization of a cost function in sub-step 93. Similarly to the principle used in previous step 2, the cost of a structure is defined as the sum of the costs of all the pixels of the structure;
Finding 94 the translation, among a limited number of possible translations, that minimizes the cost of the path; the search for the optimal translation is implemented with a full exploration of the possible translations within the limits of allowed translations in sub-step 94; the movements of the structure are limited to vertical and horizontal translations;
Moving 95 the path by the optimal translation found at the previous step; the hypothesis of motion continuity is used to reduce the area where the translations are considered in sub-step 95;
Iteration 96 from the sub-step 92 of path estimation until the end of the sequence.
The cost function used for the spatio-temporal tracking of the structures in the sequence is based on individual pixel costs calculated as in equation (1). The main difference is that the gradient is calculated for all the frames of the sequence and that these frames are considered as a two-dimensional (X,Y)+time (t) volume [(2-D+t) volume] and not as individual frames. This provides a spatio-temporal estimation of the gradient in the sequence. This technique is interesting because it smoothes the gradient in time direction, which ensures more motion continuity between successive frames. Since the computation of the (2-D+t) gradient is the most time consuming step of the whole processing of the AAAWM tool, this computation is performed in the regions of interest denoted by ROIP for the proximal wall border determination, and ROID for the distal wall border determination. Same ROIs are used in all the frames of the sequence and thus defines the (2-D+t) image. Cost images for ROIP and ROID are represented respectively in
Implementation of Step 4: Evaluation of the Artery Dilations.
The ultrasound color information used to process the wall motion is the ultrasound raw color data. It is composed of the lines of the ultrasound color scanning and, for each line, the estimates of velocities in depth. The distensibility is interactively measured by selecting two opposite points on the arterial walls in an image. The two points are linked by segment 11, illustrated as shown in
The dilation estimation is the result of the difference of motion between two structures for each ultrasound color line. The dilations are calculated, as disclosed in the document cited as prior art, in order to provide input data for the interface of the application, as illustrated by the image of
Implementation of Step 5: Display of the Images and Parameters.
In order to represent the motion in the images, a choice must be made regarding the estimated direction of the motion. In this application, the hypothesis is that the motion of the artery walls is perpendicular to the artery principal axis. The display provided in each frame of the sequence is limited to two types of information. The first type is the structure location. The proximal and distal walls, called structures 12, are represented in colors, preferably in the same color, called first color. Then, the motion of each wall along each ultrasound color line is preferably represented in another color, called second color. The reference line for a null motion is the structure itself and the amplitudes are represented starting from the structure position. The representation of the lines of the second color allows to understanding the direction of projection that was selected for each motion amplitude. The lines of the second color are interconnected to represent the overall shape 13 of the motion between ultrasound color lines. After the processing, the results are summarized on a dedicated interface, such as in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
02293133.1 | Dec 2002 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB03/05914 | 12/12/2003 | WO | 6/10/2005 |