The present disclosure generally relates to the field of ultrasound communication. More specifically, the present disclosure includes medical devices configured for bidirectional communication using ultrasound signals.
Medical implants have various forces exerted on them in vivo, especially medical implants that are adjustable in situ. Such adjustable medical implants for example, are used in limb lengthening and spinal adjustable surgical procedures to treat conditions such as limb deformities and scoliosis. Typically, these adjustable medical implants are secured to one or more bones and gradually adjusted over time until some patient outcome is achieved.
These surgical implants and procedures do not include an accurate and non-invasive means of measurement of in vivo conditions, such as forces and pressures, present at the implant site. Particularly, during the course of treatment. A need exists for a device and method to facilitate the ability of care providers to non-invasively ascertain conditions present at the implant.
The present disclosure provides transcutaneous ultrasonic power transmission and bidirectional data communication between medical devices located on and/or within a body of a patient.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a system including: an implant and an external transceiver, the implant having at least one ultrasonic transducer configured to receive an ultrasound signal sent by the external transceiver and convert that ultrasound signal to electrical energy to power the implant.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an implant including a sensor and an ultrasonic transducer, wherein the sensor is configured to measure a physical property of the implant, and wherein the implant is configured to transmit data corresponding the measurement via an ultrasound signal produced by the ultrasonic transducer.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an adjustable implant, the adjustable implant including an actuator and at least one ultrasonic transducer, wherein the ultrasonic transducer is configured to receive an ultrasound signal sent by an external transceiver, and convert that ultrasound signal to electrical energy to power the actuator, and wherein the implant is configured for the bidirectional ultrasonic data communication using the ultrasonic transducer to send and receive adjustment instructions between the adjustable implant and the external transceiver.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a sensor module configured to be integrated with an implant, the sensor module including: a sensor, an ultrasonic transducer, and a controller, wherein the sensor, ultrasonic transducer, and controller are operably connected, and wherein the sensor module is configured for bidirectional data communication using ultrasound signals.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an external transceiver configured to be placed adjacent to a patient's skin having at least one ultrasonic transducer, wherein the at least one ultrasonic transducer is configured for bidirectional data communication using ultrasound signals.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of transcutaneous transmission of power to an implant positioned within a subject via an ultrasound signal.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of transcutaneous transmission of power to an implant using an ultrasound signal including: transmitting an ultrasound signal from an external transceiver to the implant, receiving the ultrasound signal at the implant with an ultrasonic transducer; converting the signal to electrical energy using the ultrasonic transducer; and using the electrical energy to power the implant.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of transcutaneous bidirectional data communication using an ultrasound signal, the method including: placing an implant within a body of a patient, placing a transceiver on or within the body of the patient, and transcutaneously transmitting ultrasound signals between the implant and the transceiver.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of transcutaneous bidirectional data communication using an ultrasound signal, the method including: implanting a device within a body of a patient, transmitting at least one of power or data to the device using an ultrasound signal, and transmitting data from the device using an ultrasound signal.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of c using an ultrasound signal, the method comprising the steps of: implanting a sensor module within a body of a patient, transmitting at least one of wireless power or data to the sensor module using an ultrasound signal; and transmitting data from the sensor module using an ultrasound signal.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a local body area network (BAN), the local body area network includes one or more implants configured for transcutaneous bidirectional data communication, allowing the one or more implants to communicate data across the local body area network transcutaneously.
In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a local body area network (BAN), the local body area network includes an external transceiver configured for transcutaneous ultrasonic communication, and one or more implants configured for transcutaneous ultrasonic communication, wherein the external transceiver and the one or more implants are configured to communicate data across the local body area network (BAN).
These and other features will be further understood by those with skill in the art upon a review of the appended drawings, wherein:
For purposes of explanation and not limitation, details and descriptions of certain embodiments are hereinafter provided such that one having ordinary skill in the art may be enabled to make and use the invention. These details and descriptions are representative only of certain embodiments, however, and a myriad of other embodiments which will not be expressly described will be readily understood by those having skill in the art upon a thorough review hereof. Accordingly, any reviewer of the instant disclosure should interpret the scope of the invention by the claims, and such scope shall not be limited by the embodiments described and illustrated herein.
Ultrasonic communication in medical implants can provide one or more of: power, enhanced control, and feedback between medical implants and/or external transceivers.
In Radio Frequency (RF) signals, which utilize electromagnetic waves, information may be conveyed within the body. But RF signals experience large amounts of attenuation in aqueous tissues, bone tissues, and largely reflect off metallic surfaces. Ultrasound waves experience much less attenuation within aqueous tissues, bone tissues, and can even penetrate through metallic surfaces. Ultrasound signals are ultrasound waves that convey information via known amplitude and phase shifting techniques, similar to common techniques used in RF telecommunication. Phase-Shift Keying is a digital modulation process which conveys data by changing the phase of a constant frequency carrier wave. The modulation is accomplished by varying the sine and cosine inputs at a precise time. It is widely used for wireless LANs, RFID and Bluetooth (BT). Binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) or any known modulation technique may be used in ultrasound communication including: On-Off Keying (OOK), Amplitude-Shift Keying (ASK) and Frequency-Shift Keying (FSK).
The frequency of ultrasound sound waves chosen to establish the bidirectional ultrasonic communication may include any frequency of ultrasound, but are generally greater than about 20 kilohertz. In some embodiments, the frequency of ultrasound sound waves may be between 200 and 400 kilohertz, for example about 300 kilohertz. The benefits of utilizing ultrasound sound waves for power and data transmission include: (1) that ultrasound sound waves have favorable propagation and minimal attenuation characteristics through metal or solid mediums (e.g., metallic medical implants), and (2) that ultrasound sound waves transmit data transcutaneously through various aqueous tissues in animals (e.g. human skin, muscle and bone).
Once a transcutaneous bidirectional ultrasound communication link is established, the implant may have a power consumption of between 0.5 mW and 80 mW, 1 mW and 60 mW, and 2.0 mW and 40 mW, 10 mW, 5 mW, and any subrange thereof. The ultrasonic transducer may consume about 20 mW of power when in operation. The ultrasonic transducer may be configured to transmit data through at least four inches of water or aqueous tissues at a rate of 5 values per second (lkb/s) with a data reliability of over 95%. Data reliability transmitted from the ultrasonic transducer at these power levels may be at least 95%, at least 98%, at least 99%, at least 99.9%, or 100%. “Data reliability” means reliability over 10 minutes as calculated from a bit error rate (BER).
As discussed above, ultrasonic communication in medical implants can provide one or more of: power, enhanced control, and biofeedback between medical implants and external transceivers. Ultrasonic communication in medical implants includes of one or more of power transmission and data transmission using ultrasound signals. The ultrasound signal may be one or more of filtered, demodulated, amplified, and analyzed using one or more of physical components and software techniques.
Communication may be established in one direction. In some embodiments, the external transceiver may transmit an ultrasound signal to the implant to transfer power from the external transceiver to the implant. As discussed above, the ultrasound signal may be modulated. The implant is configured to harvest electrical energy from the ultrasound signal and may include one or more of a filter, a mixer, and a modulator to configure the implant for power reception. In some embodiments, the circuitry of the implant may include one or more of a filter, a mixer, and a modulator with and any known electrical components and circuitry to configure the implant for data communication. In some embodiments, one or more of a discrete demodulator and mixer implemented on the implants controller.
For bidirectional communication, and communication across a network, the implant may communicate back to the external transceiver during one or more of a pause and a release the line time period, during which the external transceiver may cease signal transmission allowing the implant to send modulated ultrasound signals back to the transceiver. For example, the transceiver may act as a master and command or query the implant acting as a slave, then pause ultrasound signal transmission for a period and allow the slave implant to send an ultrasound signal and for example: confirm or reply to the query.
In some embodiments, bidirectional communication may include continuous power transmission. For example, the external transceiver sending a constant power signal to the implant. This power signal from external transceiver to implant may be modulated using the techniques above to transmit data from external transceiver to implant. The implant, may communicate data back to the external transceiver via backscatter/load modulation. For example, the incident energy from the external transceiver may be reflected back by the implant towards the external transceiver to communicate.
In some embodiments the ultrasound transducer may be shorted by a switching device, for example a BJT or MOSFET on an integrated circuit. In some embodiments, the ultrasound transducer may be shorted by a switch, relay, solid state relay, vacuum tube, and any other known device configured to short the ultrasound transducer for backscattering/load modulation.
In some embodiments, power transmission may be sequential. For example, the external transceiver sending a pulsed power signal to the implant. This power signal from external transceiver to implant may be modulated using the techniques above to transmit data from external transceiver to implant. The implant, may communicate data back to the external transceiver when during pauses in data transmission.
In the near field region (with the implant and the external transceiver in close proximity), adjusting the impedance of the load is known as load modulation. Due to the coupling of the relatively closely spaced transducers, a change in the impedance of the ultrasound transducer of the implant, will be observable by the external transceiver. The external transceiver's ultrasound transducer will appear to its driving circuit to change in impedance, and draw different amounts of current.
In the far field region (implant and external transceiver at a greater distance), adjusting the impedance of the load is known as backscatter communications. Changing the impedance of the implant's ultrasound transducer changes the magnitude of the reflected energy. Shorting out the implant's ultrasound transducer will result in increased reflection of energy. This reflected energy pattern may be visible at the external transceiver.
These and other data communication protocols may be readily understood by those having skill in the art. As one with skill in the art may appreciate, the above communication protocols are described with an implant communicating with an external transceiver. In some embodiments, each of the implant and the external transceiver can be replaced by one or more of: a second implant, a sensor module, and a tertiary device.
In
In some aspects, the implant 100 may be, by way of example, a distraction rod, an intramedullary rod, or any other adjustable implant or medical device intended for placement on and within the body of a patient. Wireless activation and or powering of the implant 100 using ultrasound waves, may eliminate a need for the internal power storage devices required by some known adjustable implants.
The implant 100, may be made of Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), Polyetherketone (PEK), Titanium (Ti), and any other material known and used in the art of manufacture of medical implants. The material may be chosen depending on the application of the implant 100. The implant 100, may be fabricated using known fabrication, including known electronic fabrication techniques.
In some embodiments, the ultrasonic transducer 101 may include any device that induces sound waves or mechanical vibration, and converts soundwaves to electronic signals, including for example: a piezoelectric transducer, a single crystal ultrasonic transducer, a lead zirconate titanate (PZT) ultrasonic transducer, piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) ultrasonic transducer, capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers (CMUT), piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers (CMUT), or any ultrasonic transducer known and used in the art. In some embodiments, the ultrasonic transducer 101 may include one or more of: a thin film ultrasonic transducer, a flat ultrasonic transducer, a tubular ultrasonic transducer. A benefit for example of a thin film ultrasonic transducer is the reduced thickness of the ultrasonic transducer. A benefit for example of a flat ultrasonic transducer is improved transmission and reception characteristics. A benefit for example of a tubular ultrasonic transducer is multi-directional transmission and reception. The type of ultrasonic transducer may be chosen to complement the application of the implant 100.
In some embodiments, the external device 900 may retrieve an ID tag of an implant 100 using ultrasound waves. For example, the implant 100 may include an integrated circuit and an ultrasonic transceiver 101, which are used to transmit data corresponding to an ID tag of the mplant 100 to the external device 900 using ultrasound waves. The external device 900 may transmit an ultrasound signal modulated at a particular temperance to the implant 100. Upon receipt, the modulated ultrasound signal will be converted to electrical power by the ultrasonic transducer and may activate a digital switch of the implant 100. Upon activation, the implant may transmit a modulated ultrasound signal corresponding to the ID tag, back to the external device 900. Allowing a user to determine the ID tag and corresponding implant 100 without for example taking unnecessary radiological images which may expose the patient to radiation.
In some embodiments, a phased array containing multiple ultrasonic transducers may be provided to one or more of the external device and the implant to provide enhanced reception capabilities to the implant or external device.
Turning to
The controller 202 may be any type of controller 202 known and used in the art including: high performance microcontrollers (MCUs), Programmable System on Chip (PSoC), Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) or any other type of controller or microcomputer. The controller 202 may be disposed on a printed circuit board which may also contain other electronic circuitry and connect other electrical components including: Analog to Digital Converter (ADC), Digital to Analog Converter (DAC), op-amps, memory or any other electrical component. The controller may further include a frequency synthesizer (i.e., creates carrier waves for ultrasonic transducer 201), power amplifiers, noise filters (i.e., conditions carrier wave), power and read strain gauges (i.e., force sensor controls), and may be configured to adjust carrier waves, power, etc. such as by computer executable instructions that interface with a user via a graphical user interface, as discussed below.
A power storage device 204 may be provided. The power storage device 204 may include a battery, a capacitor, and any other power storage device. The power storage device 204 may include a rechargeable battery, for example a Lithium ion rechargeable battery. The power storage device may include a solid state battery and any battery including any known battery chemistry.
The implant 200 may include a charging circuit operably connected to one or more of the power storage device 204 and the piezoelectric transducer 201. The charging circuit may be at least partially integrated into for example the controller 202. The power storage device 204 may be operably connected to the controller 202 via any electronic conductor including wires, boards, and interconnects. The charging circuit may include any charging circuit known and used in the art.
The implant 200 may be configured to receive an ultrasound signal sent by an external transceiver 900, and convert that ultrasound signal to electrical energy using the ultrasonic transducer 201. The recharging circuit may use the generated electrical energy to charge the power storage device 204.
The external transceiver 900 may recharge a battery of the implant 200, by transmitting an ultrasound signal to the implant 100, with the piezo electric transducer configured to convert the ultrasound signal to electrical power to recharge the battery. In some embodiments, the external transceiver 900 may activate the implant 100 by sending pulses of ultrasound signal for “stop and go” charging of the capacitor. For example, the capacitor may be charged by a pulse or a series of pulses, with just enough energy to one or more of: make an incremental adjustment and send a signal back to the external transceiver. In some embodiments, real time charging of the power storage device can enable continuous drive of an actuator of the implant.
In some embodiments, other known wireless charging circuits and techniques including for example, inductive coupling and magnetic coupling may be used to wirelessly transfer power to the implant 200.
In some embodiments, an external transceiver 900 may activate the circuitry of the implant 200 by transmitting an ultrasound signal to the ultrasonic transducer 201. The ultrasound waves of the ultrasound signal may be received by the ultrasonic transducer 201 and converted into electrical energy. The controller 202 may be programmed such that upon receipt of ultrasound waves corresponding to a modulated signal, for example a particular step function of a particular temperance, the controller 202 will close an electrical switch and activate the implant 200. Similarly, in other embodiments a particular step function may be used to open an electrical switch and deactivate the implant 200 to conserve power stored in the power storage device 204.
In some embodiments, the controller 202 may be programmed to time the implant 200 out after a certain period of time, for example if the ultrasound transducer 201 has not sent or received an ultrasound signal for a test period of time, the controller 202 may deactivate the implant 200.
In some embodiments, the controller 202 may be programmed to turn off the power storage device 204 and to put the implant 200 to sleep for a certain period of time to conserve power. For example, the controller may activate the implant 200 for ¼ of 1 second to one or more of: transmit ultrasound signals using the ultrasound transducer 201, obtain measurements using the sensor 205, control an actuator, communicate with other electronics of the implant 200, etc. During this ¼ of the second the implant 200 is said to be “awake”. The controller 202 may deactivate the implant 200 for ¾ of the second. During this ¾ of the second the device is said to be asleep.
In some embodiments the implant 200 may include one or more sensor 205 operably connected to the controller 202. The one or more sensor 205 may be designed to measure temperature, position, force, pressure, capacitance, resistance, and any other physical property or characteristic of the implant 200 or surrounding anatomical structures of the patient A. In some embodiments, the sensor may include for example a position sensor (e.g. optical sensor). In the illustrated embodiment, the sensor 205 may be configured to sense force or temperature for example.
In some embodiments, the sensor 205 may include a Micro-Electro-Mechanical-System (MEMS) sensor. These sensors provide a reduced profile (e.g. 1 μm-100 μm size). The MEMS sensor may include an accelerometer, pressure sensor, gas sensors, humidity sensor, a gyrosensor, ambient light sensor, optical sensor, gesture sensor, proximity sensor, position sensor, touch sensor, and may include any other known sensory functionality.
The sensor 205 may communicate a sensor reading to the controller 202, which may convert the reading to a modulated electrical signal. The modulated electrical signal may then be used to drive the ultrasonic transducer 201, which then transmits ultrasound waves at a frequency corresponding to the modulated electrical signal.
The controller 202 may change analogue information from the sensor to digital values and may drive modulation of the ultrasonic transducer 201, to transmit data using ultrasound waves. Any known signal modification technique for data transmission may be used for ultrasound waves that may be used for example with RF data transmission. Including any type of pass band modulation.
The implant 200 may include an adjustable implant. The adjustable implant may include any actuator known and used in the art. As one with skill in the art may appreciate, the actuator may include for example an electric motor, a rotatable magnet, an impact driver, and any known actuator used in medical implants. The implant 200 may be configured to harvest ultrasound waves transmitted by another implant or an external transceiver, and convert the ultrasound waves to electrical energy to power the actuator.
In
Now, adjustable implants experience numerous forces in vivo. For example, as the length of the illustrated distraction rod is increased, the distraction rod will experience axial forces pushing down through the lead screw on the magnet 311. Thrust bearings 313 are provided to mitigate the effect of these forces on the rotation of the magnet 311. However, when using an External Controller to noninvasively apply the magnetic field and adjust the distraction rod, biofeedback is often limited.
The implant 300 in
A power storage device 334 is provided. The power storage device 334 may include a battery, a capacitor, and any other rechargeable power storage device.
The sensor module 330 may include a recharging circuit operably connected to the power storage device 334 and the tubular piezoelectric transducer 331. The recharging circuit may be for example: integrated into the controller 332 or disposed on another printed circuit board. The power storage device 334 may be operably connected to the controller 332 via an interconnect 333.
The sensor module 330 is configured to receive an ultrasound signal sent by an external transceiver 900, and convert that ultrasound signal to electrical energy using the tubular piezoelectric transducer 331. The recharging circuit may use the harvested electrical energy to charge the power storage device 334.
In some embodiments, an external transceiver 900 may activate the circuitry of the sensor module 330 by transmitting ultrasound waves to the sensor module 330. The ultrasound waves are received by the tubular piezoelectric transducer 331 and converted into electrical energy. The controller 332 may be programmed such that upon receipt of ultrasound waves corresponding to a particular modulated signal, for example a particular step function of particular temperance, the controller may close an electrical switch and activate the device. Similarly, in other embodiments a particular step function may open the electrical switch and deactivate the device to conserve power.
In some embodiments, the controller 332 may be programmed to time out after a certain period of time, wherein if for example the piezoelectric transducer 331 has not sent or received ultrasound waves, thereby conserving charged power levels of the power storage device 334, extending a battery life thereof.
In some embodiments the sensor module 330 may be configured to have a power consumption of between 0.5 mW and 80 mW, 1 mW and 60 mW, and 2.0 mW and 40 mW, 10 mW, 5 mW, or any subrange thereof. The transmitter 30 may consume about 20 mW of power when in operation. The transmitter 30 may be configured to transmit data at least four inches through water at a rate of 5 values per second (lkb/s) with a data reliability of 95%. Data reliability transmitted from the transmitter at these power levels may be at least 95%, at least 98%, at least 99%, at least 99.9%, or 100%. “Data reliability” means reliability over 10 minutes as calculated from a bit error rate (BER).
The sensor module 330 may include one or more sensors 335 operably connected to the controller 332. The sensors 335 may be designed to measure force, temperature, pressure, capacitance, resistance, and any other type of sensor known and used in the art. In the instant embodiment the sensor module 330 is configured to sense axial force from the distraction device using a force sensor 335. The force sensor 335 of the sensor module 330 is operably coupled to the distraction rod using an adapter plate 314.
The force sensor 335 communicates a sensor reading to the controller 332, which may convert the reading to a modulated electrical signal. The modulated electrical signal may then be used to drive the piezoelectric transducer 331, which then transmits ultrasound waves transcutaneously to an external transceiver 900. In some embodiments, forms of modulation may include: on-off keying, amplitude shift keying (ASK), frequency shift keying (FSK), phase shift keying (PSK), analogue frequency modulation, or any other form of modulation commonly known and used for data transmission. Advantageously, signals that are modulated use less power than non-modulated signals and may be transmitted and received at greater distance from the sensor module 330 than non-modulated signals. Modulated signals may also have a greater accuracy than non-modulated signals.
In some embodiments, the sensor module 330 includes an encapsulation 336 providing a hermetic seal to the sensor module 330. In order to prevent air gaps which include pockets of unnecessary ultrasonic impedance, in some embodiments the piezoelectric transducer 331 is coupled to at least a portion of the encapsulation 336 using a conductive epoxy (see
The conductive epoxy may include any ultrasound conductive material to reduce air gaps, including aluminum epoxy, copper epoxy, copper tape, Ti-epoxy, industry acoustic couplant, and any other material providing favorable electrical and acoustic conductive properties. When selecting a conductive epoxy one may consider: i.) impedance matching to improve the ultrasonic transmission efficiency between the implant and the piezoelectric transducer, and ii.) the circuit grounding the electronics.
The sensor module 330 may include a memory and may log data corresponding to one or more of a reading of the sensor 335, data received from the external transceiver 900 via ultrasound signals, and other data corresponding to the implant 300 and a biological condition of the patient. For example, the sensor module 330 may record sensor 335 data at various time intervals. In some embodiments data logging includes overwriting the data where needed to maintain files similar to for example a car dash camera.
Upon establishing a bidirectional communication link with an external transceiver 900 using ultrasound signals, the external transceiver 900 may download the data from the sensor module 330. A user may later retrieve the data from the external transceiver 900 and be able to plot the data, giving the user invaluable insights into the in-situ forces being placed on the implant 100.
In some embodiments, the external transceiver 900 may include a wired or RF communication capability and may additionally be accessible to a remote user through one or more of the internet, WiFi, Bluetooth, and cellular networks. In some embodiments, the user can remotely update a firmware of the controller 332, for example across the internet by remotely accessing the external transceiver 900. In some embodiments, the user can transmit adjustment instructions to the implant 100, for example across the internet by remotely accessing the external transceiver 900. In some embodiments, the user can access data from the implant 100, for example across the internet by remotely accessing the external transceiver 900.
As one with skill in the art may appreciate, in the instant embodiment the implant 300 includes a sensor module 330 having various capabilities and features. In some other embodiments, these various components and features may be incorporated directly into the implant 300 similar to those discussed supra.
In the illustrated embodiment, the sensor module 400 has a cylindrical profile. As one with skill in the art may appreciate the sensor module 400 may conform to any profile including: a rectangular profile, a block profile, a disc profile, a patch, a membrane, and any known profile of an implant and a surface of an implant. Wherein the implant is a distraction rod, the cylindrical profile may provide some advantageous. For example, the cylindrical profile of the sensor module 400 is intended to allow a maximum amount of contact surface of the sensor module 400 across an internal surface of the distraction rod. Matching the curvature of the sensor module to the intended implant provides improved transmission and reception characteristics of the sensor module 400, across greater surface area of the implant, and provides up to 360 degrees of reception.
In
In
In some embodiments the ultrasonic transducer 401 is tubular, for example having a channel extending axially therethrough. In such embodiments, the ultrasonic transducer 401 may be coupled to a chassis 407 having interconnects extending therethrough. One interconnect 433 may be configured to operably connect the ultrasonic transducer 401 to a first terminal of the controller 402. The other interconnect 403 may be configured to operably connect the power storage device 404 to a second terminal of the controller 402. The controller 402 may interface with, be integrated with, or otherwise operably connected to a sensor 405.
In some embodiments, the ground terminal of the power storage device 404 may be shorted to the encapsulation 406. In such embodiments, the outer diameter of the tubular ultrasonic transducer 401 may also be shorted to ground at the encapsulation 406, through a conductive epoxy 408. At least one of the controller 402 or a sensor 405 may also be shorted to ground at the encapsulation 406. In such embodiments, the chassis 407 may provide insulation of the positive terminal of the power storage device 404, and interconnects 403 from ground.
In some embodiments, wherein the implant is made of a metallic material, the encapsulation 406 may be shorted to the implant grounding the internal circuitry of the sensor module.
As discussed above, the circuit board may further include other electronic circuitry and components therein including: Analog to Digital Converter (ADC), Digital to Analog Converter (DAC), op-amps, memory and other known electronic components. The controller 402 may be integrated to include a frequency synthesizer (i.e., creates carrier waves for ultrasonic transducer 401), power amplifier and noise filters (i.e., conditions carrier wave), power and read strain gauge (i.e., force sensor controls), and may be configured to adjust carrier waves, power, etc. (such as by computer executable instructions that interface with a user via a graphical user interface, as discussed below).
Turning to
In some embodiments, the sensor module 530 may be integrated with a processor circuit of an implant using any type of interconnection, cable, or communication protocol including RF, Bluetooth, and ultrasound as described above. The sensor module 530 may receive data from the processor circuit of the implant, and communicate the data transcutaneously to the external transceiver 900.
In some embodiments, the external transceiver 900 may obtain data from the implant 500, for example in the instant embodiment data is obtained via the sensor module 530. The external transceiver 900 may then report the data to a tertiary device 910 via an ultrasonic connection, an RF connection, a cable connection, an internet connection, a cell phone connection, a Wi-Fi connection, a Bluetooth connection, and any known data communication protocol. The tertiary device 910 may be for example: a computer, a cell phone, a server, and any other device capable of data communication. The tertiary device 910 may be enabled to drive the external transceiver 900 to communicate with the sensor module 530, including for example having the capability to actively control an actuator of the implant 500.
The external transceiver 900 may include an external adjustment device configured to for adjusting an adjustable implant. The external adjustment device may include one or more ultrasonic transducer disposed on a surface of the external adjustment device. Upon placing the external adjustment device in close proximity to a patient's skin, a bidirectional ultrasound communication link or network may be established between the external adjustment device and one or more implants configured for ultrasound communication. The bidirectional ultrasound communication link established to pass distraction and or bioinformation between the external transceiver 900 and the one or more implants.
In some embodiments, the external transceiver 900 may be a wearable device. The wearable device may be for example: a bracelet, a watch, an arm band, arm sleeve, arm brace, a leg band, a leg sleeve, a leg brace, a back brace, a body sleeve, a neck brace, a head brace, and any type of other wearable device known and used in the art. The wearable device may be made using additive manufacturing techniques including 3D printing.
The external transceiver may include a ultrasonic transducer, or multiple ultrasonic transducers forming one or more array. A one dimensional array has multiple ultrasonic transducers disposed in a column. The ultrasonic transducer of a one dimensional array can be assigned a position relative to their position on the array. A two dimensional array has multiple ultrasonic transducers disposed in a matrix or pattern. The ultrasonic transducer can be assigned a location relative to two dimensions of the matrix.
Now, the external transceiver 900 communicates with the sensor module 530 using transcutaneous bidirectional ultrasound signals transmitted from an ultrasound transducer 501 to the external transceiver 900, and from the external transceiver 900 to the ultrasound transducer 501. In this embodiment, the ultrasound transducer 501 includes a piezoelectric transducer.
The external transceiver 900 may communicate with the tertiary device 910. In some embodiments the tertiary device 910 may communicate with one or more of the external transceiver 900 and the sensor module 530 using ultrasound signals. In some embodiments, the tertiary device 910 may communicate with the external transceiver 900 using for example RF communication protocols. The tertiary device 910 may be in further communication with one or more of the internet and other telecommunication networks, allowing a user to remotely access the sensor module 530, and even control an implant 500 from anywhere.
In some embodiments, a High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ultrasonic transducer having a fixed focal depth may be provided to one or more of the external transceiver and the sensor module to provide enhanced reception capabilities to the sensor module or the external transceiver. An offset, including an adjustable offset, may be provided to the external transceiver to move the external transceiver to and hold the external transceiver at a distance from the sensor module corresponding to the fixed focal depth of the HIFU ultrasonic transducer. This allows a user to find a maximum amount of transmission to or from the sensor module and improves power transmission and data communication between the sensor module and the external transceiver.
However, as one with skill in the art may appreciate, improper alignment of focal depth 904 of the HIFU ultrasonic transducer 901 to the skin may induce air-gaps between the skin of the patient and the HIFU ultrasonic transducer 901. These air gaps can result in high impedance to the ultrasound signal, reducing transmission to the sensor module 530 disposed within the body of the patient. Further because the focal depth 904 is fixed, some of the ultrasound signal will miss the ultrasonic transducer 531 of the sensor module 530. This may result in for example less power being communicated to the sensor module 530.
As one with skill in the art may appreciate, the amount of transmission observed at the sensor module 530 in
The external transceiver 900 may include any number of ultrasonic transducers 901 or ultrasonic transducer arrays 931.
In some embodiments the external transceiver 900 may include a display. The display may be a programmable touch screen display. For example, LED, LCD, or plasma display.
A first user, for example a physician, may program the external transceiver 900 or a controller 902 of the external transceiver 900 with a first set of operational instructions. The external transceiver 900 may be programmed such that these operational instructions may be password protected. In some embodiments, the first user may be able to access the device remotely through for example the internet. The first user may send operational instructions to the external transceiver 900 over a remote connection. The first user may also download from the external transceiver 900, data regarding measurements obtained by the external transceiver 900.
A second user may be able to operate the external transceiver 900 through their cell phone, a computer, any other tertiary device 910, or the display. The second user may be able to program the device with a second set of operational instructions. The second user may be able to pair a tertiary device 910 to the external transceiver 900.
The external transceiver 900 of
As discussed above the external transceiver 900 may be configured to communicate with the implant using ultrasound waves. For example, the array of ultrasonic transducers 931 may transmit a particular step function of ultrasound waves to the implant 300. The implant 300 may include an ultrasonic transducer 301 configured to receive the ultrasound waves and convert them to electrical energy. The implant 300 may use the electrical energy to power the implant 300. The implant 300 may be an adjustable implant and may use the electrical energy to activate an actuator of the implant 300, for example an electric motor to change a dimension of the implant 300. The implant 300 may use the electrical energy to activate a controller 302 of the implant 300. The controller 302 of the implant 300 may communicate with the controller of the external device 900. The controller 302 may establish a connection to the internet, or to a tertiary device 910 through the external transceiver 900. The implant 300 may include a sensor 305 configured to sense a measurement of the implant 300 or surrounding tissues or fluids. The implant 300 may communicate sensor measurements to the external transceiver 900 using ultrasound waves. One or more of the external transceiver and the implant may include some of the various components and functionalities as discussed throughout this disclosure.
In some embodiments the external transceiver 900 may image or detect a location of the implant 300 by detecting an amount of transmission or an amount of reflection of ultrasound waves. In some embodiments the external transceiver 900 may form one or more ultrasound images of the bone and or implant 300 using ultrasound waves.
In some embodiments to form a three dimensional image, the external transceiver 900 may yield bone densities in four or more quadrants of a bone. In some embodiments: ultrasound waves may be generated by one ultrasonic transducer 901 of the array of ultrasonic transducers 931, the ultrasound waves emitted by the one ultrasonic transducer 901 may act analogously to a light source in a camera. The rest of the ultrasonic transducers 901 will detect the reflection and/or transmission of the ultrasound waves, the array 931 acting analogously to the focal plane array of a camera. This sequence may repeat one element at a time around the array. The controller 902 or some tertiary device 910 may process the data obtained by the ultrasonic transducers to form a stereoscopic three dimensional image looking at the subject from multiple perspectives.
The external transceiver 900 is shown including a controller 902, operably connected to the ultrasonic transducers 901b, 901c, 901d. In some embodiments the external transceiver 900 may include one or more of a memory module for storing data obtained by the ultrasonic transducers 901b, 901c, 901d, a networking device for transferring the data to a tertiary device, and a power storage device operably coupled to the controller.
The external transceiver 900 is configured to noninvasively detect a location corresponding to a position of low bone density A′ on a bone of the patient A. The external transceiver 900 may also be configured to generate a three dimensional plot of bone density. For example, the controller may assign known locations along a length of the external transceiver 900, to the ultrasonic transducer 901b, 901c, 901d or to the array of ultrasonic transducers disposed on the external transceiver 900.
The controller will instruct a first ultrasonic transducer 901b, or a first array of ultrasonic transducers, to emit ultrasound waves at a chosen frequency B. One or more of the ultrasonic transducers 901b, 901c, 901d may then be instructed to sense the ultrasound waves B of the first ultrasonic transducer 901b.
In areas of relatively high bone density, there will be a relatively strong reflection of the ultrasound waves by the bone. In areas of relatively low bone density, elevated transmission rates of ultrasound waves across the bone will be observed.
In the illustrated embodiment, relatively high amounts of reflection will be observed by the first ultrasonic transducer 901b and the controller will assign high bone density to the position correlated with the position of the first ultrasonic transducer 901b or to the region associated with the array assigned to the first ultrasonic transducer 901b. The controller may instruct a second ultrasonic transducer 901c to transmit ultrasound waves at a chosen frequency C. The ultrasound waves C′ will pass through the area of low bone density A′ and will be observed by a third ultrasonic transducer 901d for example on the other side of the bone. The controller will assign a low bone density to the position correlated with the position of the second ultrasonic transducer 901c or to a region associated with an array assigned to the second ultrasonic transducer 901c. The controller can then construct a plot of bone density along the length of the external transceiver 900.
In some embodiments, the external transceiver 900 is configured to locate a position of low bone density A′ on a bone of the patient A, and wherein upon determining the location, the controller is configured to instruct one or more of the ultrasonic transducers 901b, 901c, 901d to transmit ultrasound waves at a therapeutic ultrasonic frequency to promote bone healing or bone growth. Studies have correlated certain ultrasound frequencies to improved bone healing and therapy.
The position of low bone density A′ may be determined by the external transceiver 900 as described above. However, in some embodiments the position of low bone density may be acquired by inputting the location into the external transceiver 900 using for example a touch screen LCD display operably coupled to the controller. In some embodiments, the position of low bone density may be acquired by inputting the location into the external transceiver 900 remotely from a tertiary device 910 using an established radiofrequency connection, for example a Wi-Fi or a Bluetooth connection. In some embodiments, the external transceiver 900 may be in communication with one or more implants within the patient via ultrasound waves and the one or more implants may determine the location of bone density and communicate that position to the external transceiver 900.
Knowing the position of low bone density A′, the controller 902 may be preprogrammed or remotely programmed with treatment instructions. The controller 902 may then instruct one or more of the ultrasonic transducers to transmit ultrasound waves at a bone healing frequency to the position.
For example, in
As discussed above, the implant may include a sensor module, or have an ultrasonic data communication circuit integrated into the implant.
Turning to
As seen in
The Body Area Network connection may provide the host access to drive the client implants. This includes one or more of: powering the client implant, activating the client implant, actuating the client implant, receiving data from the client implant, and adjusting the client implant in any way as discussed supra or commonly known in the art.
The Body Area Network may establish through the host a connection to any external network. For example, in
As one with skill in the art may appreciate, these exemplary embodiments are not intended to be exhaustive. The structure and features of the individual embodiments may be interchangeable between the other various embodiments. Wherein a specific feature of one embodiment is not explicitly stated as part of another, this disclosure is intended to include variations, with features of the embodiment intended to be communicable to other embodiments to arrive at the full and reasonable scope of the claims.
In addition, the blocks in the figure may show functionality and operation of one possible implementation of the present embodiment. In this regard, the block may represent a module, a segment, or a portion of program code, which includes one or more instructions executable by a processor for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. The program code may be stored on any type of computer readable medium, for example, such as a storage device including a disk or hard drive. The computer readable medium may include non-transitory computer-readable media that stores data for short periods of time, such as register memory, processor cache, or Random Access Memory (RAM), and/or persistent long term storage, such as read only memory (ROM), optical or magnetic disks, or compact-disc read only memory (CD-ROM), for example. The computer readable media may be able, or include, any other volatile or non-volatile storage systems. The computer readable medium may be considered a computer readable storage medium, a tangible storage device, or other article of manufacture, for example.
Alternatively, the blocks in the figure may represent circuitry that is wired to perform the specific logical functions in the process. Illustrative methods, such as those shown in the blocks in the figure, may be carried out in part by a component or components on the internet, in the cloud and/or on a computer system. However, it should be understood that the example methods may instead be carried out by other entities or combinations of entities (i.e., by other computing devices and/or combination of computer devices), without departing from the scope of this disclosure. For example, functions of the method of the blocks in the figure may be fully performed by a computing device (or components of a computing device such as one or more processors), or may be distributed across multiple components of the computing device, across multiple computing devices (e.g., control unit and image processing device), and/or across a server.
Now, the exemplary method shown in
As discussed above, powering the implant may include activating the implant, actuating the implant, charging the implant, or any other form of supplying power to internal circuitry of the implant. The electrical energy may be immediately or subsequently used. Further, the implant may have an ultrasonic transducer, and as described above may include a sensor module.
In some embodiments the method may further include the step of communicating information received by the sensor module to a controller of the implant. In some embodiments this step may be performed through a direct connection, for example a wired connection. In some embodiments this step may be performed through an indirect connection, for example a wireless connection including one or more of RF communication and ultrasound communication.
As one with skill in the art can appreciate, these exemplary embodiments of methods are not intended to be exhaustive. The blocks of the individual methods may be substituted and interchangeable between the various embodiments. Additional blocks may be added and substituted to the various embodiments corresponding to additional steps and features disclosed throughout these papers.
Now, although particular features and embodiments have been described in an effort to enable those with skill in the art to make and use the claimed invention, it should be understood that several variations, alterations or substitutions can be achieved to arrive at the subject matter disclosed. Nothing in this description shall be construed as limiting the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims, below.
This application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/802,457, filed on Feb. 7, 2019, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/959,357, filed on Jan. 10, 2020, the entire disclosures of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2702031 | Wenger | Feb 1955 | A |
3111945 | Von Solbrig | Nov 1963 | A |
3372476 | Peiffer | Mar 1968 | A |
3377576 | Langberg | Apr 1968 | A |
3512901 | Law | May 1970 | A |
3597781 | Eibes | Aug 1971 | A |
3900025 | Barnes, Jr. | Aug 1975 | A |
3915151 | Kraus | Oct 1975 | A |
RE28907 | Eibes et al. | Jul 1976 | E |
3976060 | Hildebrandt et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4010758 | Rockland et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4056743 | Clifford et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4068821 | Morrison | Jan 1978 | A |
4078559 | Nissinen | Mar 1978 | A |
4204541 | Kapitanov | May 1980 | A |
4357946 | Dutcher et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4386603 | Mayfield | Jun 1983 | A |
4448191 | Rodnyansky et al. | May 1984 | A |
4486176 | Tardieu et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4501266 | McDaniel | Feb 1985 | A |
4522501 | Shannon | Jun 1985 | A |
4537520 | Ochiai et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4550279 | Klein | Oct 1985 | A |
4561798 | Elcrin et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4573454 | Hoffman | Mar 1986 | A |
4592355 | Antebi | Jun 1986 | A |
4595007 | Mericle | Jun 1986 | A |
4642257 | Chase | Feb 1987 | A |
4658809 | Ulrich et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4700091 | Wuthrich | Oct 1987 | A |
4747832 | Buffet | May 1988 | A |
4854304 | Zielke | Aug 1989 | A |
4904861 | Epstein et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4931055 | Bumpus et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4940467 | Tronzo | Jul 1990 | A |
4957495 | Kluger | Sep 1990 | A |
4973331 | Pursley et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5010879 | Moriya et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5030235 | Campbell, Jr. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041112 | Mingozzi et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5064004 | Lundell | Nov 1991 | A |
5074882 | Grammont et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5092889 | Campbell, Jr. | Mar 1992 | A |
5133716 | Plaza | Jul 1992 | A |
5142407 | Varaprasad et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5156605 | Pursley et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5263955 | Baumgart et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5290289 | Sanders et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306275 | Bryan | Apr 1994 | A |
5330503 | Yoon | Jul 1994 | A |
5334202 | Carter | Aug 1994 | A |
5336223 | Rogers | Aug 1994 | A |
5356411 | Spievack | Oct 1994 | A |
5356424 | Buzerak et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364396 | Robinson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5403322 | Herzenberg et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5429638 | Muschler et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437266 | McPherson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5466261 | Richelsoph | Nov 1995 | A |
5468030 | Walling | Nov 1995 | A |
5480437 | Draenert | Jan 1996 | A |
5509888 | Miller | Apr 1996 | A |
5516335 | Kummer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527309 | Shelton | Jun 1996 | A |
5536269 | Spievack | Jul 1996 | A |
5549610 | Russell et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5573012 | McEwan | Nov 1996 | A |
5575790 | Chen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582616 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5620445 | Brosnahan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620449 | Faccioli et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626579 | Muschler et al. | May 1997 | A |
5626613 | Schmieding | May 1997 | A |
5632744 | Campbell, Jr. | May 1997 | A |
5659217 | Petersen | Aug 1997 | A |
5662683 | Kay | Sep 1997 | A |
5672175 | Martin | Sep 1997 | A |
5672177 | Seldin | Sep 1997 | A |
5700263 | Schendel | Dec 1997 | A |
5704938 | Staehlin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5704939 | Justin | Jan 1998 | A |
5720746 | Soubeiran | Feb 1998 | A |
5743910 | Bays et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5762599 | Sohn | Jun 1998 | A |
5771903 | Jakobsson | Jun 1998 | A |
5810815 | Morales | Sep 1998 | A |
5827286 | Incavo et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830221 | Stein et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5879375 | Larson, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902304 | Walker et al. | May 1999 | A |
5935127 | Border | Aug 1999 | A |
5945762 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961553 | Coty et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976138 | Baumgart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979456 | Magovern | Nov 1999 | A |
6022349 | McLeod et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033412 | Losken et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6034296 | Elvin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6102922 | Jakobsson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106525 | Sachse | Aug 2000 | A |
6126660 | Dietz | Oct 2000 | A |
6126661 | Faccioli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138681 | Chen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139316 | Sachdeva et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162223 | Orsak et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170488 | Spillman, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183476 | Gerhardt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200317 | Aalsma et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234956 | He et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241730 | Alby | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245075 | Betz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6315784 | Djurovic | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319255 | Grundei et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331744 | Chen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336929 | Justin | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343568 | McClasky | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358283 | Hogfors et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375682 | Fleischmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389187 | Greenaway et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400980 | Lemelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402753 | Cole et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409175 | Evans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416516 | Stauch et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6499907 | Baur | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500110 | Davey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508820 | Bales | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510345 | Van Bentem | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6537196 | Creighton, IV et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554831 | Rivard et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565573 | Ferrante et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565576 | Stauch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582313 | Perrow | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583630 | Mendes et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6616669 | Ogilvie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626917 | Craig | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6656135 | Zogbi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6656194 | Gannoe et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667725 | Simons et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673079 | Kane | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6702816 | Buhler | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706042 | Taylor | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709293 | Mori et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730087 | Butsch | May 2004 | B1 |
6761503 | Breese | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769499 | Cargill et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789442 | Forch | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796984 | Soubeiran | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802844 | Ferree | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809434 | Duncan et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6835207 | Zacouto et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6852113 | Nathanson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6918838 | Schwarzler et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918910 | Smith et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921400 | Sohngen | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923951 | Contag et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6971143 | Domroese | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7001346 | White | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008425 | Phillips | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011658 | Young | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7029472 | Fortin | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7029475 | Panjabi | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041105 | Michelson | May 2006 | B2 |
7060080 | Bachmann | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7063706 | Wittenstein | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7105029 | Doubler et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7105968 | Nissen | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114501 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115129 | Heggeness | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135022 | Kosashvili et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7160312 | Saadat | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163538 | Altarac et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189005 | Ward | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191007 | Desai et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7218232 | DiSilvestro et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238191 | Bachmann | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7241300 | Sharkawy et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7243719 | Baron et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255682 | Bartol, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7282023 | Frering | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285087 | Moaddeb et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302015 | Kim et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302858 | Walsh et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314443 | Jordan et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333013 | Berger | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7357037 | Hnat et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357635 | Belfor et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360542 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7390007 | Helms et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390294 | Hassler, Jr. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402134 | Moaddeb et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402176 | Malek | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7429259 | Cadeddu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7445010 | Kugler et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7458981 | Fielding et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485149 | White | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7489495 | Stevenson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7530981 | Kutsenko | May 2009 | B2 |
7531002 | Sutton et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7553298 | Hunt et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561916 | Hunt et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7611526 | Carl et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618435 | Opolski | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7658754 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666184 | Stauch | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666210 | Franck et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678136 | Doubler et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678139 | Garamszegi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708737 | Kraft et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7708762 | McCarthy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727143 | Birk et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753913 | Szakelyhidi, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753915 | Eksler et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7762998 | Birk et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763080 | Southworth | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766855 | Miethke | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775215 | Hassler, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776068 | Ainsworth et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776075 | Bruneau et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787958 | Stevenson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794476 | Wisnewski | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811328 | Molz, IV et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7835779 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837691 | Cordes et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7862586 | Malek | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867235 | Fell et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875033 | Richter et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7901381 | Birk et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909852 | Boomer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918844 | Byrum et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7938841 | Sharkawy et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7985256 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988709 | Clark et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002809 | Baynham | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011308 | Picchio | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034080 | Malandain et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043299 | Conway | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043338 | Dant | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057473 | Orsak et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057513 | Kohm et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082041 | Radziemski | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8083741 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092499 | Roth | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8095317 | Ekseth et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105360 | Connor | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8114158 | Carl et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123805 | Makower et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8133280 | Voellmicke et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147549 | Metcalf, Jr. et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162897 | Byrum | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162979 | Sachs et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8177789 | Magill et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8197490 | Pool et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8211149 | Justis | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8211151 | Schwab et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221420 | Keller | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8226690 | Altarac et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236002 | Fortin et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8241331 | Arnin | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8246630 | Manzi et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8252063 | Stauch | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8267969 | Altarac et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8278941 | Kroh et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8282671 | Connor | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8323290 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8357182 | Seme | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366628 | Denker et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8372078 | Collazo | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386018 | Stauch et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388553 | James et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8394124 | Biyani | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8403958 | Schwab | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414584 | Brigido | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425608 | Dewey et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435268 | Thompson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8439926 | Bojarski et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8444693 | Reiley | May 2013 | B2 |
8469908 | Asfora | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8470004 | Reiley | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8486070 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8486076 | Chavarria et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8486147 | De Villiers et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494805 | Roche et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8496662 | Novak et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8518062 | Cole et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523866 | Sidebotham et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529474 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529606 | Alamin et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529607 | Alamin et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8556901 | Anthony et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556911 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556975 | Ciupik et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562653 | Alamin et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568457 | Hunziker | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8617220 | Skaggs | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579979 | Edie et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585595 | Heilman | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585740 | Ross et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8591549 | Lange | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591553 | Eisermann et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8613758 | Linares | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623036 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632544 | Haaja et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632548 | Soubeiran | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632563 | Nagase et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636771 | Butler et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636802 | Serhan et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8641719 | Gephart et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8641723 | Connor | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657856 | Gephart et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663285 | Dall et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8663287 | Butler et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668719 | Alamin et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8709090 | Makower et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8721643 | Morgan et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8758347 | Weiner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8758355 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8771272 | LeCronier et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777947 | Zahrly et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777995 | McClintock et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790343 | McClellan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790409 | Van den Heuvel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8828058 | Elsebaie et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8828087 | Stone et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840651 | Reiley | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8870881 | Rezach et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870959 | Arnin | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8915866 | Nycz | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8915915 | Harrison et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8915917 | Doherty et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8920422 | Homeier et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8945188 | Rezach et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961521 | Keefer et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961567 | Hunziker | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8968402 | Myers et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8974366 | Radziemski et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8992527 | Guichet | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9022917 | Kasic et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9044218 | Young | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060810 | Kercher et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9078703 | Arnin | Jul 2015 | B2 |
10252066 | Radziemski et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
20020050112 | Koch et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072758 | Reo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020164905 | Bryant | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030040671 | Somogyi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030144669 | Robinson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030220643 | Ferree | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220644 | Thelen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040011137 | Hnat et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011365 | Govari et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019353 | Freid et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023623 | Stauch et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055610 | Forsell | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040133219 | Forsell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138725 | Forsell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193266 | Meyer | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050034705 | McClendon | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049617 | Chatlynne et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065529 | Liu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090823 | Bartimus | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050159754 | Odrich | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050234448 | McCarthy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234462 | Hershberger | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246034 | Soubeiran | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261779 | Meyer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272976 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004459 | Hazebrouck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009767 | Kiester | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036259 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036323 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036324 | Sachs et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047282 | Gordon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058792 | Hynes | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069447 | DiSilvestro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074448 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079897 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136062 | DiNello et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142767 | Green et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155279 | Ogilvie | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195087 | Sacher et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195088 | Sacher et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200134 | Freid et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060204156 | Takehara et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235299 | Martinelli | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235424 | Vitale et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241746 | Shaoulian et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241767 | Doty | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249914 | Dulin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271107 | Harrison et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282073 | Simanovsky | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293683 | Stauch | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010814 | Stauch | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010887 | Williams et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021644 | Woolson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070031131 | Griffitts | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043376 | Leatherbury et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050030 | Kim | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070118215 | Moaddeb | May 2007 | A1 |
20070161984 | Cresina et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173837 | Chan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179493 | Kim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185374 | Kick et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233098 | Mastrorio et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238992 | Donofrio et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239159 | Altarac et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239161 | Giger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255088 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270803 | Giger et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276368 | Trieu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276369 | Allard et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276373 | Malandain | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276378 | Harrison et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276493 | Malandain et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288024 | Gollogly | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288183 | Bulkes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080009792 | Henniges et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015577 | Loeb | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021454 | Chao et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021455 | Chao et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021456 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027436 | Cournoyer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033431 | Jung et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080033436 | Song et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046037 | Haubrich et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051784 | Gollogly | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082118 | Edidin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086128 | Lewis | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097487 | Pool et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097496 | Chang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108995 | Conway et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161933 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167685 | Allard et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172063 | Taylor | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177319 | Schwab | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177326 | Thompson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080190237 | Radinger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228186 | Gall et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228231 | Raphael et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255615 | Vittur et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272928 | Shuster | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080275557 | Makower et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090030462 | Buttermann | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076597 | Dahlgren et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082815 | Zylber et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088803 | Justis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093820 | Trieu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093890 | Gelbart | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112263 | Pool et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090163780 | Tieu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171356 | Klett | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192514 | Feinberg et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198144 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216113 | Meier et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090270949 | Kalpin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275984 | Kim et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100004654 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057127 | McGuire et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094306 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100185 | Trieu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106192 | Barry | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114322 | Clifford et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130941 | Conlon et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137872 | Kam et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145449 | Makower et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145462 | Ainsworth et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168751 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249782 | Durham | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256626 | Muller et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262239 | Boyden et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100318129 | Seme et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331883 | Schmitz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004076 | Janna et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110057756 | Marinescu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066188 | Seme et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110098748 | Jangra | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110152725 | Demir et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110196435 | Forsell | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202138 | Shenoy et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238126 | Soubeiran | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110257655 | Copf, Jr. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110284014 | Cadeddu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120019341 | Gabay et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019342 | Gabay et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120053633 | Stauch | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120088953 | King | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109207 | Trieu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116535 | Ratron et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120157889 | Tanis et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158061 | Koch et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172883 | Sayago | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179215 | Soubeiran | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120221106 | Makower et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120271353 | Barry | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120296234 | Wilhelm et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329882 | Messersmith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013066 | Landry et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130072932 | Stauch | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130123847 | Anderson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138017 | Jundt et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138154 | Reiley | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150863 | Baumgartner | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150889 | Fening et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130178903 | Abdou | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178915 | Radziemski et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130211521 | Shenoy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130245692 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253344 | Griswold et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253587 | Carls et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261672 | Horvath | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296863 | Globerman et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296864 | Burley et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296940 | Northcutt et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325006 | Michelinie et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130325071 | Niemiec et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345566 | Weitzel et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140005788 | Haaja et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025172 | Lucas et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052134 | Orisek | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058392 | Mueckter et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058450 | Arlet | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140066987 | Hestad et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140088715 | Ciupik | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140128920 | Kantelhardt | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163664 | Goldsmith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140236234 | Kroll et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236311 | Vicatos et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257412 | Patty et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277446 | Clifford et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296918 | Fening et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140303538 | Baym et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140303539 | Baym et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140336474 | Arbabian et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140343350 | Martinson et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140358150 | Kaufman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150080639 | Radziemski et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150105782 | D'Lima et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150105824 | Moskowitz et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150257799 | Janna et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150335285 | Poon et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20170125892 | Arbabian et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170279571 | Melodia | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170319858 | Radziemski et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1697630 | Nov 2005 | CN |
101040807 | Sep 2007 | CN |
1541262 | Jun 1969 | DE |
8515687 | Dec 1985 | DE |
19626230 | Jan 1998 | DE |
19745654 | Apr 1999 | DE |
102005045070 | Apr 2007 | DE |
0663184 | Jul 1995 | EP |
1905388 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2901991 | Dec 2007 | FR |
2900563 | Aug 2008 | FR |
2892617 | Sep 2008 | FR |
2916622 | Sep 2009 | FR |
2961386 | Dec 2011 | FR |
H0956736 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2002500063 | Jan 2002 | JP |
WO1998044858 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO1999051160 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO2001024697 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO2001045485 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO2001045487 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO2001067973 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO2001078614 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO2007013059 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007015239 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2008018612 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2011116158 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO2013119528 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2014040013 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abe et al., “Experimental external fixation combined with percutaneous discectomy in the management of scoliosis.”, Spine, 1999, pp. 646-653, 24, No. 7. |
Ahlbom et al., “Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection,”, Health Physics, 1998, pp. 494-522, 74, No. 4. |
Amer et al., “Evaluation of treatment of late-onset tibia vara using gradual angulation translation high tibial osteotomy”, ACTA Orthopaedica Belgica, 2010, pp. 360-366, 76, No. 3. |
Angrisani et al., “Lap-Band® Rapid Port™ System: Preliminary results in 21 patients”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 936, 15, No. 7. |
Baumgart et al., “A fully implantable, programmable distraction nail (Fitbone)—new perspectives for corrective and reconstructive limb surgery.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 189-198. |
Baumgart et al., “The bioexpandable prosthesis: A new perspective after resection of malignant bone tumors in children.”, J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2005, pp. 452-455, 27, No. 8. |
Bodó et al., “Development of a tension-adjustable implant for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.”, Eklem Hastaliklari ve Cerrahisi—Joint Diseases and Related Surgery, 2008, pp. 27-32, 19, No. 1. |
Boudjemline et al., “Off-label use of an adjustable gastric banding system for pulmonary artery banding.”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, pp. 1130-1135, 131, No. 5. |
Brown et al., “Single port surgery and the Dundee Endocone.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions: Emerging Technology Poster Abstracts, 2007, ETP007, pp. 323-324. |
Buchowski et al., “Temporary internal distraction as an aid to correction of severe scoliosis”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, pp. 2035-2041, 88-A, No. 9. |
Burghardt et al., “Mechanical failure of the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor in limb lengthening.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, pp. 639-643, 93-B, No. 5. |
Burke, “Design of a minimally invasive non fusion device for the surgical management of scoliosis in the skeletally immature”, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2006, pp. 378-384, 123. |
Carter et al., “A cumulative damage model for bone fracture.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1985, pp. 84-90, 3, No. 1. |
Chapman et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: A systematic literature review.”, Surgery, 2004, pp. 326-351, 135, No. 3. |
Cole et al., “Operative technique intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: Tibial surgical technique.”, Orthofix, 2005. |
Cole et al., “The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia.”, Injury, 2001, pp, S-D-129-S-D-139, 32. |
Dailey et al., “A novel intramedullary nail for micromotion stimulation of tibial fractures.”, Clinical Biomechanics, 2012, pp. 182-188, 27, No. 2. |
Daniels et al., “A new method for continuous intraoperative measurement of Harrington rod loading patterns.”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1984, pp. 233-246, 12, No. 3. |
De Giorgi et al., “Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of severe scoliosis.”, European Spine Journal, 1999, pp. 8-15, No. 1. |
Dorsey et al., “The stability of three commercially available implants used in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2006, pp. 95-98, 19, No. 2. |
Edeland et al., “Instrumentation for distraction by limited surgery in scoliosis treatment.”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1981, pp. 143-146, 3, No. 2. |
Elsebaie, “Single growing rods (Review of 21 cases). Changing the foundations: Does it affect the results?”, Journal of Child Orthop, 2007, 1:258. |
Ember et al., “Distraction forces required during growth rod lengthening.”, J of Bone Joint Surg BR, 2006, p. 229, 88-B, No. Suppl. II. |
European Patent Office, “Observations by a third party under Article 115 EPC in EP08805612 by Soubeiran.”, 2010. |
Fabry et al., “A technique for prevention of port complications after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding.”, Obesity Surgery, 2002, pp. 285-288, 12, No. 2. |
Fried et al., “In vivo measurements of different gastric band pressures towards the gastric wall at the stoma region.”, Obesity Surgery, 2004, p. 914, 14, No. 7. |
Gao et al., CHD7 gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis, American Journal of Human Genetics, 2007, pp. 957-965, 80. |
Gebhart et al., “Early clinical experience with a custom made growing endoprosthesis in children with malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity actioned by an external permanent magnet; The Phenix M. system”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage. Sep. 3, 2007, Hamburg, Germany, (2 pages). |
Gillespie et al. “Harrington instrumentation without fusion.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1981, p. 461, 63-B, No. 3. |
Goodship et al., “Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998, pp. S105-S115, No. 355S. |
Grass et al., “Intermittent distracting rod for correction of high neurologic risk congenital scoliosis.”, Spine, 1997, pp. 1922-1927, 22, No. 16. |
Gray, “Gray's anatomy of the human body.”, http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject/128, published Jul. 1, 2007. |
Grimer et al. “Non-invasive extendable endoprostheses for children—Expensive but worth it!”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, 2007. |
Grünert, “The development of a totally implantable electronic sphincter.” (translated from the German “Die Entwicklung eines total implantierbaren elektronischen Sphincters”), Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1969, pp. 1170-1174, 325. |
Guichet et al. “Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, pp. 838-848, 85-A, No. 5. |
Gupta et al., “Non-invasive distal femoral expandable endoprosthesis for limb-salvage surgery in paediatric tumours.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, pp. 649-654, 88-B, No. 5. |
Hankemeier et al., “Limb lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD).”, Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2005, pp. 79-101, 17, No. 1. |
Harrington, “Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation.”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1962, pp. 591-610, 44-A, No. 4. |
Hennig et al., “The safety and efficacy of a new adjustable plate used for proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthrosis.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2007, pp. 6-14, 20, No. 1. |
Hofmeister et al., “Callus distraction with the Albizzia nail.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 211-215. |
Horbach et al., “First experiences with the routine use of the Rapid Port™ system with the Lap-Band®.”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4. |
Hyodo et al., “Bone transport using intramedullary fixation and a single flexible traction cable.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996, pp. 256-268, 325. |
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, “Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields.” Health Physics, 2009, pp. 504-514, 96, No. 4. |
INVIS®/Lamello Catalog, 2006, Article No. 68906A001 GB. |
Kasliwal et al., “Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis.”, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2013, pp. 275-291, 24, No. 2. |
Kenawey et al., “Leg lengthening using intramedullay skeletal kinetic distractor: Results of 57 consecutive applications.”, Injury, 2011, pp. 150-155, 42, No. 2. |
Kent et al., “Assessment and correction of femoral malrotation following intramedullary nailing of the femur.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2010, pp. 580-584, 76, No. 5. |
Klemme et al., “Spinal instrumentation without fusion for progressive scoliosis in young children”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1997, pp. 734-742, 17, No. 6. |
Korenkov et al., “Port function after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.”, Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, pp. 1068-1071, 17, No. 7. |
Krieg et al., “Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008, pp. 189-197, 466, No. 1. |
Kucukkaya et al., “The new intramedullary cable bone transport technique.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2009, pp. 531-536, 23, No. 7. |
Lechner et al., “In vivo band manometry: A new method in band adjustment”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 935, 15, No. 7. |
Lechner et al., “Intra-band manometry for band adjustments: The basics”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, pp. 417-418, 16, No. 4. |
Li et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail: A case report with histologic examination of the regenerated segment.”, Injury, 1999, pp. 525-534, 30, No. 8. |
Lonner, “Emerging minimally invasive technologies for the management of scoliosis.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 431-440, 38, No. 3. |
Matthews et al., “Magnetically adjustable intraocular lens.”, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2003, pp. 2211-2216, 29, No. 11. |
Micromotion, “Micro Drive Engineering General catalogue.”, 2009, pp. 14-24. |
Mineiro et al., “Subcutaneous rodding for progressive spinal curvatures: Early results.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2002, pp. 290-295, 22, No. 3. |
Moe et al., “Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984, pp. 35-45, 185. |
Montague et al., “Magnetic gear dynamics for servo control.”, Melecon 2010—2010 15th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Valletta, 2010, pp. 1192-1197. |
Montague et al., “Servo control of magnetic gears.”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2012, pp. 269-278, 17, No. 2. |
Nachemson et al., “Intravital wireless telemetry of axial forces in Harrington distraction rods in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1971, pp. 445-465, 53, No. 3. |
Nachlas et al., “The cure of experimental scoliosis by directed growth control.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1951, pp. 24-34, 33-A, No. 1. |
Newton et al., “Fusionless scoliosis correction by anterolateral tethering . . . can it work?.”, 39th Annual Scoliosis Research Society Meeting, 2004. |
Oh et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail for reconstruction of long bone defects in tibia.”, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2008, pp. 801-808, 128, No. 8. |
Ozcivici et al., “Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone.”, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2010, pp. 50-59, 6, No. 1. |
Piorkowski et al., Preventing Port Site Inversion in Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2007, 3(2), pp. 159-162, Elsevier; New York, U.S.A. |
Prontes, “Longest bone in body.”, eHow.com, 2012. |
Rathjen et al., “Clinical and radiographic results after implant removal in idiopathic scoliosis.”, Spine, 2007, pp. 2184-2188, 32, No. 20. |
Ren et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Surgical technique”, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2003, pp. 257-263, 13, No. 4. |
Reyes-Sanchez et al., “External fixation for dynamic correction of severe scoliosis”, The Spine Journal, 2005, pp. 418-426, 5, No. 4. |
Rinsky et al., “Segmental instrumentation without fusion in children with progressive scoliosis.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 1985, pp. 687-690, 5, No. 6. |
Rode et al., “A simple way to adjust bands under radiologic control”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4. |
Schmerling et al., “Using the shape recovery of nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis.”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1976, pp. 879-892, 10, No. 6. |
Scott et al., “Transgastric, transcolonic and transvaginal cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions, Poster Abstracts, Apr. 18-22, 2007, P511, p. 306. |
Sharke, “The machinery of life”, Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Feb. 2004, Printed from Internet site Oct. 24, 2007 http://www.memagazine.org/contents/current/features/moflife/moflife.html. |
Shiha et al., “Ilizarov gradual correction of genu varum deformity in adults.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2009, pp. 784-791, 75, No. 6. |
Simpson et al., “Femoral lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor.”, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009, pp. 955-961, 91-B, No. 7. |
Smith, “The use of growth-sparing instrumentation in pediatric spinal deformity.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 547-552, 38, No. 4. |
Soubeiran et al. “The Phenix M System, a fully implanted non-invasive lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet. Applications in limb salvage.” International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, Sep. 13, 2007, Hamburg, Germany, (2 pages). |
Soubeiran et al., “The Phenix M System. A fully implanted lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet; Applications to pediatric orthopaedics”, 6th European Research Conference in Pediatric Orthopaedics, Oct. 6, 2006, Toulouse, France (7 pages). |
Stokes et al., “Reducing radiation exposure in early-onset scoliosis surgery patients: Novel use of ultrasonography to measure lengthening in magnetically-controlled growing rods. Prospective validation study and assessment of clinical algorithm”, 20th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, Jul. 11, 2013, Vancouver, Canada. Scoliosis Research Society. |
Sun et al., “Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: Interfragmentary micro movement”, Bone, 2007, pp. 188-196, 41, No. 2. |
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR II. Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib II: Technique Guide.”, 2008, 40 pgs. |
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib, Patient Guide.”, 2005, 26 pgs. |
Takaso et al., “New remote-controlled growing-rod spinal instrumentation possibly applicable for scoliosis in young children.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 1998, pp. 336-340, 3, No. 6. |
Teli et al., “Measurement of forces generated during distraction of growing rods.”, Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, 2007, pp. 257-258, 1, No. 4. |
Tello, “Hamngton instrumentation without arthrodesis and consecutive distraction program for young children with severe spinal deformities: Experience and technical details.”, The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1994, pp. 333-351, 25, No. 2. |
Thaller et al., “Limb lengthening with hilly implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX®)—Preliminary results.”, Injury, 2014 (E-published Oct. 28, 2013), pp. S60-S65, 45. |
Thompson et al., “Early onset scoliosis: Future directions”, 2007, J Bone Joint Surg Am, pp. 163-166, 89-A, Suppl 1. |
Thompson et al., “Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 2007, pp. 354-361, 27, No. 3. |
Thonse et al., “Limb lengthening with a fully implantable, telescopic, intramedullary nail.”, Operative Techniques in Orthopedics, 2005, pp. 355-362, 15, No. 4. |
Trias et al., “Dynamic loads experienced in correction of idiopathic scoliosis using two types of Harrington rods.”, Spine, 1979, pp. 228-235, 4, No. 3. |
Verkerke et al., “An extendable modular endoprosthetic system for bone tumor management in the leg”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1990, pp. 91-96, 12, No. 2. |
Verkerke et al., “Design of a lengthening element for a modular femur endoprosthetic system”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1989, pp. 97-102, 203, No. 2. |
Verkerke et al., “Development and test of an extendable endoprosthesis for bone reconstruction in the leg.”, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1994, pp. 155-162, 17, No. 3. |
Weiner et al., “Initial clinical experience with telemetrically adjustable gastric banding”, Surgical Technology International, 2005, pp. 63-69, 15. |
Wenger, “Spine jack operation in the correction of scoliotic deformity: A direct intrathoracic attack to straighten the laterally bent spine: Preliminary report”, Arch Surg, 1961, pp. 123-132 (901-910), 83, No. 6. |
White, III et al., “The clinical biomechanics of scoliosis.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1976, pp. 100-112, 118. |
Yonnet, “A new type of permanent magnet coupling.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1981, pp. 2991-2993, 17, No. 6. |
Yonnet, “Passive magnetic bearings with permanent magnets.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1978, pp. 803-805, 14, No. 5. |
Zheng et al., “Force and torque characteristics for magnetically driven blood pump.”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2002, pp. 292-302, 241, No. 2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200253588 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62959357 | Jan 2020 | US | |
62802457 | Feb 2019 | US |