The present invention relates to controlling tightening of a bolt or screw in a bolted joint, and more particularly, a method and apparatus that does so based on the tension or clamp force in the bolted joint determined by monitoring the bolt elongation using ultrasonic waves propagated through the bolt and reflected at its end.
The reliability of bolted assemblies is mainly a function of the level of the initial clamping load and the stability of the clamping load over the life of the joint. The initial level of clamping load is determined by the bolt preload achieved during the initial tightening of the bolted joint, which is often estimated based on torque level. However, the torque-tension relationship of a threaded bolt is highly sensitive to the friction variations between threads and under the turning bolt head or nut. Even moderate friction variations cause large scatter in the torque-tension correlation, which may compromise the reliability of the bolted joints for which the clamping force is estimated based solely on the torque level.
For critical applications, the bolt preload may be determined more accurately by measuring the bolt elongation caused by tightening. In contrast with the torque-tension relationship, friction plays no role in the correlation between bolt stretch and bolt tension. Bolt tension and the resulting clamping force in a bolted joint are directly proportional to the bolt elongation. So, the tightening process may be controlled by monitoring the bolt elongation. Similarly, the residual tension in a bolt remains directly proportional to the residual bolt elongation.
In the elastic range, the bolt tension F is given by
F=Kb*Δl (1)
where Kb is the spring rate of the bolt (lb/in, N/mm), and Δl is the bolt elongation. This relationship is depicted in
As is known, the spring rate of the bolt, Kb, can be determined experimentally through a load-elongation test of the same grip length of the bolt, or by developing an analytical model that provides the bolt spring rate. Obviously, the bolt elongation that corresponds to a desired preload level depends on the grip length of the bolt. Hence, bolts with shorter grip length will experience smaller elongations, which must be measured precisely in order to reduce the percentage error in the elongation measurement. Sheet metal applications provide examples for short grip lengths. In such applications, the bolt elongation may be very small, and hence this requires high precision measurements that ultrasonic technology may offer.
With reference to
Ultrasonics have been used to control bolt tightening. One such technique is discussed in Nassar et al., “Controlling the turn of the screw,” Mechanical engineering magazine, vol. 113, no. 9, September 1991, pp. 52-56 (which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety) However, this techniques involves monitoring and controlling the tightening process by using a constant, stress-independent, wave speed in order to use change in the round trip time to obtain bolt elongation. This, however, does not take into account the fact that the wave speed changes as the bolt is elongated during tightening. To compensate for this wave speed variation, this technique uses a correction factor called stress factor (“SF”), which is commonly obtained by mechanical calibration using gage blocks in a tension elongation test.
Ultrasonic wave speed is stress and elongation dependent. The speed of sound in a material is affected by the stress field. Higher stress impedes the transmission of ultrasonic waves in the bolt, making the round trip time of the wave longer. This makes the change in the bolt length appear to be larger than the actual elongation. The temperature dependence of the ultrasonic speed increases or decreases depending on whether the stress is applied parallel or perpendicular to the direction of the wave propagation.
For longitudinal waves through the bolt, only the axial stress level will cause changes in the wave speed. Stress due to shear loading or torsional stresses does not affect the sound velocity along the length of the bolt. The change in the wave speed is linear with respect to the stress level. It increases or decreases according to whether the stress is applied parallel to or perpendicular to wave propagation respectively. For a longitudinal ultrasonic wave propagating parallel to the direction of the applied axial stress, the governing equation, as discussed in “Measurement of Residual Stress Using the Temperature Dependence of Ultrasonic Velocity,” K. Salama, G. C. Barber, and N. Chandrasekaran, Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, 1982, p. 877, is:
Where λ and μ are lame or second-order elastic constants; l and m are Murnaghan's third-order elastic constants; ρ is density, ν is wave speed and σ is the compressive stress.
Due to the fact that tightened bolts are subjected to positive tensile stress, equation (2) is rewritten for bolts as follows:
Equation (3) may be integrated to yield:
where ν is wave speed in stressed bolt and ν0 is zero stress wave speed.
In the elastic range, the axial stress σ may be expressed in terms of the axial elongation Δl as follows:
where Δl/L is the axial strain of the bolt.
The wave speed is given in terms of bolt elongation and material properties by:
The wave speed after the bolt is stressed depends on initial speed of the longitudinal wave in the bolt, bolt elongation and the material properties. In equation (6), the material properties are constant except the density of the bolt material. The initial density ρ0 of the stressed segment of the bolt material is given by:
The density ρ of the stressed segment of the bolt is given by:
The density change Δρ in the stressed segment of the bolt is given by:
In the elastic range, the change in volume per unit volume is:
If the bolt is subjected to uniaxial stress, then stresses σY=σZ=0. The change in volume then becomes:
The change in density is then given by:
Using equations (11) and (12), the change in density is given by:
where L is the initial length of the bolt, Δl is the elongation of the bolt, M is the mass of the stressed segment of the bolt, V is the volume of the stressed segment of the bolt, V0 is the initial volume, ΔV change in bolt volume due to bolt elongation and ν is Poisson's ratio.
Stress level in the bolt affects the temperature dependence of the wave speed. The effect of stress on the temperature dependence of longitudinal ultrasonic wave speed becomes much smaller, and opposite in sign, when the stress is applied parallel to the direction in which the waves are propagated.
Tightening of a bolt is controlled by monitoring the propagation of longitudinal ultrasonic waves through the bolt and the reflection of these waves at the end of the bolt. The round trip time of the longitudinal waves through bolt is continuously measured and monitored in real-time. Elongation of the bolt as it is being tightened is determined based on the change in the round trip time of the longitudinal waves, which provides the level of bolt tension and joint clamp load. When the elongation of the bolt reaches a predetermined level, tightening is automatically stopped.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
Tightening of bolt 406 is controlled in apparatus 400 based on actual bolt elongation determined from data obtained using ultrasonic transducer 412. More specifically, computer 416 drives motor 408 to tighten bolt 406. As bolt 406 is being tightened, ultrasonic transducer 412 generates ultrasonic pulses, illustratively at a frequency of 5 MHz, that are applied to the head 407 of bolt 406. Ultrasonic transducer 412 also senses the propagation of longitudinal ultrasonic waves traveling through bolt 406 caused by these ultrasonic pulses and inputs a signal(s) to data acquisition device 414 indicative of these longitudinal ultrasonic waves. Data acquisition device 414 collects round trip time data of these longitudinal ultrasonic waves from the signal(s) input from ultrasonic transducer 412 and sends this data to computer 418, round trip time being the time for the longitudinal ultrasonic waves to travel from bolt head 407 to the end of bolt 406 and back. As bolt 406 is being tightened, the change in the wave speed of the longitudinal ultrasonic waves due to stress level change is updated by computer 418, which is programmed with a varying wave speed algorithm, discussed below, to determine actual elongation of bolt 406.
The varying wave speed program is programmed to implement an algorithm based on equation (6) above to determine the change in length of bolt 406 from the round trip time data of the ultrasonic longitudinal waves propagating in bolt 406 as bolt 406 is tightened. More specifically, round trip time in an unstretched bolt is
and the round trip time in an elongated bolt is given by
The change in round trip time is thus given by:
where Δt is change in round trip time. From equation (14) the actual change in length Δl of the bolt is given by:
The ultrasonic (apparent) change in length Δlapp is expressed as
The ratio of mechanical (actual) change in length to the ultrasonic (apparent) change in length is called stress factor. The stress factor is given by
The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/638,938 filed Dec. 23, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3969960 | Pagano | Jul 1976 | A |
4062227 | Heyman | Dec 1977 | A |
4413518 | Jones | Nov 1983 | A |
4530143 | Casarcia | Jul 1985 | A |
4846001 | Kibblewhite | Jul 1989 | A |
5216622 | Kibblewhite et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
6358051 | Lang et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
20020023503 | Schneider et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
60216235 | Oct 1985 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060137463 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60638938 | Dec 2004 | US |