The present invention relates to an ultrasonic surgical tool, such as an ultrasonic laparoscopic tool for cutting soft body tissues. More particularly, but not exclusively, it relates to such a tool having an operative tip that is profiled to improve the ergonomics of its use.
Ultrasonically-vibrated cutting tools have proven of major benefit for surgery, particularly laparoscopic surgery (so-called “keyhole” surgery). An elongate, narrow surgical tool, usually together with a fibre-optic endoscope viewing system, is introduced through a small incision into a patient's body and directed to an exact region of tissue requiring surgery. In more complex procedures, further tools may be introduced, by way of further incisions, then directed to the same site, although this is avoided wherever possible. In any case, a basic aim of laparoscopic surgery is to minimise the size and number of incisions (or “ports”) made into the patient's body.
The constraints inherent in working with long, narrow tools in a confined space under remote viewing (for example on a monitor screen) mean that ergonomic design of laparoscopic tools is of paramount importance.
Ultrasonically-vibratable tools bring significant benefits in such minimally invasive procedures, as they may be selectably energised so as to cut only target tissues, and they may easily be adapted to cauterise tissue as they cut. Thus, blood vessels may be both severed and sealed in one operation, for example, significantly reducing bleeding. Such haemostatic cutting is of particular benefit in laparoscopic surgery, where visibility is at a premium.
Torsional-mode ultrasonic vibrations have proven particularly effective, since they may be transmitted efficiently and precisely into selected target tissues with minimal extraneous leakage of ultrasonic energy, whereas the alternative longitudinal-mode (or compression-wave) ultrasonic vibrations may lead to undesirable propagation of energy longitudinally out of a distal end of a tool into adjacent (non-target) tissues.
A conventional ultrasonically-vibratable laparoscopic tool, whether torsional-mode or longitundinal-mode, comprises an operative element or elements extending longitudinally from a distal end of an elongate waveguide. A surgeon manipulates the tool by grasping a handgrip mounted adjacent the proximal end of the waveguide, which extends through a restricted port into a patient's body. The operative elements are thus ideally positioned to be employed on tissues substantially directly in line with the axis of the waveguide. However, to work on tissue located to one side of the axis of the waveguide, the surgeon must partially withdraw and realign the tool, constrained by the dimensions of the port and at all times manipulating the tool by its proximal end. The continual repositioning required in a complex procedure may rapidly lead to fatigue on the part of the surgeon. There is hence a need for an ergonomically superior tool that allows the surgeon to work for longer and with improved control.
As mentioned above, another important ergonomic issue in laparoscopy is clear visualisation of the operative elements of the tool and the target tissue. An endoscope viewing system is inserted through a further incision, but this may arrive at the target tissue at such an acute angle to the tool that three dimensional visualisation is difficult.
It is hence an object of the present invention to provide an ultrasonic cutting and/or coagulating tool that obviates the above disadvantages and allows a user to conduct laparoscopic surgery more conveniently and with improved control.
According to the present invention, there is provided an ultrasonic surgical tool comprising an elongate waveguide operatively connected or connectable at a proximal end to a source of ultrasonic vibrations and provided adjacent a generally-cylindrical distal end with an operative element comprising a radially-extending ridge defined between a substantially parallel pair of grooves extending longitudinally of the waveguide from a distal end thereof, said operative element being curved in a plane transverse to that of the ridge.
The operative element may be curved in a plane substantially perpendicular to that of the ridge.
Preferably, the operative element is tapered towards its distal end.
Advantageously, the operative element comprises two convergent faces extending transversely to the plane of curvature of the operative element.
A first said convergent face may thus be concavely curved and a second said convergent face convexly curved.
The operative element may comprise a substantially blunt distal tip.
Preferably, the ridge means extends in a plane generally bisecting those of the convergent faces.
Advantageously, the first, concave convergent face converges towards the plane of the ridge more gradually than does the second, convex convergent face.
The operative element thus comprises more material between the plane of the ridge and the concave convergent face than between the plane of the ridge and the convex convergent face.
Preferably, the ridge forms a cutting edge of the operative element.
Advantageously, the operative element comprises a jaw member controllably pivotably moveable into and out of engagement with the ridge.
The jaw member may be curved correspondingly with the ridge.
The jaw member may comprise a contact surface so formed as to be cooperable with the ridge.
In a preferred embodiment, the tool comprises a source of torsional mode ultrasonic vibrations.
The tool preferably comprises means whereby the operative element may be selectably rotated about a longitudinal axis of the waveguide so as to be presented to a desired element of tissue on which to act.
An embodiment of the present invention will now be more particularly described, by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now to the Figures, and to
In a second stage of the production of the tip of the tool, the result of which is shown in
The flats 11, 12 begin each level with the other at their proximal ends, but extend at slightly different angles, a first flat 11 extending at a lesser angle to the rib 2 than a second flat 12. As a result, the tip 8 is asymmetric, slightly more material remaining to a side of the rib 2 adjacent the first flat 11 than to a side of the rib 2 adjacent the second flat 12.
In cross-section (
In the final stage of production, the result of which is shown in
The waveguide tip shown in
The tapering of the waveguide 1 towards the distal tip 8 produces a tool with a much finer dissecting profile than would an equivalent untapered distal end 3 of a waveguide 1. The tapering also facilitates the step of bending the waveguide 1 around the mandrel. One further benefit is that the taper towards the distal tip 8, which is now significantly displaced from the longitudinal/torsional axis 9, reduces the moment of inertia of the tip 8. This reduces any tendency to generate unwanted unbalanced transverse vibrational modes adjacent the distal tip 8. As can be seen from
The shape of the tool shown allows it to be used as a very delicate probe or dissector until a distal portion of the rib 2 is brought into contact with the tissue to be treated, and is ultrasonically vibrated, at which point it becomes a very precise cutting/coagulating tool.
The shape is of particular advantage over existing tools when the waveguide 1 is made rotatable about the axis 9, for example using an arrangement such as that disclosed in our copending UK Patent Application No. 0500937.8. This allows the distal tip 8 to be applied to tissue all around the end 3 of the waveguide 1, by simply “dialling” a desired angular alignment of the distal tip 8, then for example sliding it under an adjacent vessel, and ultrasonically activating it to make the required cut.
A conventional operative tip of an ultrasonic laparoscopic tool extends longitudinally from the distal end of the waveguide, and so can only easily act on tissue directly in front of the tool. The surgeon would then have to realign the entire elongate tool, constrained by the size of the incision through which it passes, to work on selected tissue that is not directly in the initial path of the tool. The form of tip 8 shown gives the surgeon a far greater radius of action without needing to reposition the whole tool, a significant ergonomic improvement.
The distal tip 8 profile shown is also usable with a controllably pivotable non-vibrated jaw mechanism, of the form used in conventional linearly-arranged tools. This comprises a jaw member with a curvature corresponding with that of the rib 2, which would be brought down into contact with an upper surface of the rib 2 to trap tissue to be cut and coagulated therebetween. Optionally, a contact surface of the jaw member would be so profiled as to cooperate with the cross-sectional profile of the rib 2 and at least the flanking regions of the grooves 4 when it closes.
The distal tip 8 profile shown is of particular benefit in procedures such as a cholecystectomy on the gall bladder, in which curved cutting planes are preferred over simple flat cuts.
Clearly, with the distal tip 8 displaced outwardly from the waveguide 1, it is also easier to see in the field of view of a conventionally positioned endoscope viewer. This improved visibility aids the surgeon in carrying out swift and accurate procedures.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0504321.1 | Mar 2005 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/593,461 filed on Apr. 15, 2010, now abandoned, which claims priority to PCT International Application No. PCT/GB2006/00697 filed on Feb. 28, 2006, which was published as Publication No. WO 2006/092576 on Sep. 8, 2006, which claims priority to GB0504321.1 filed on Mar. 3, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2528941 | Bassett et al. | Nov 1950 | A |
3565062 | Kuris | Feb 1971 | A |
3657056 | Garvey et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3792701 | Kloz et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3861391 | Antonevich et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
4144646 | Takemoto et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4188952 | Loschilov et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4248232 | Engelbrecht et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4832683 | Idemoto et al. | May 1989 | A |
5019083 | Klapper et al. | May 1991 | A |
5151099 | Young et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5167619 | Wuchinich | Dec 1992 | A |
5322055 | Davison et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324297 | Hood et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324299 | Davison et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5330481 | Hood et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5413107 | Oakley et al. | May 1995 | A |
5520678 | Heckele et al. | May 1996 | A |
5549544 | Young et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5656015 | Young | Aug 1997 | A |
5695510 | Hood | Dec 1997 | A |
5749877 | Young | May 1998 | A |
5873873 | Smith et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885301 | Young | Mar 1999 | A |
5935143 | Hood et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6004335 | Vaitekunas et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6056735 | Okada et al. | May 2000 | A |
6129735 | Okada et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6283981 | Beaupre | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6425906 | Young et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6971994 | Young et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976969 | Messerly | Dec 2005 | B2 |
8025630 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20020099400 | Wolf et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128674 | Beaupre | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143355 | Messerly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040044356 | Young et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050021065 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049546 | Messerly et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050177184 | Easley | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0619993 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0646435 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0970659 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0970660 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1138264 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1229515 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1625836 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1693027 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2333709 | Aug 1999 | GB |
2365775 | Feb 2002 | GB |
2425480 | Nov 2006 | GB |
1388002 | Apr 1988 | SU |
9935982 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9952489 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0121079 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0124714 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0238057 | May 2002 | WO |
03047769 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03082132 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03082133 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2005084553 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006008502 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006059120 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006092576 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007138295 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008065323 | Jun 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT/GB2007/001968 filed May 25, 2007, European Patent Office. |
PCT International Search Report for PCT/GB2007001968 filed May 25, 2007, dated Sep. 12, 2007. |
PCT International Search Report for PCT/GB2007/003560 filed Sep. 18, 2007, dated Jan. 3, 2008. |
GB Search Report for GB 0718476.5 dated Nov. 29, 2007. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/GB2007/003560 filed Sep. 18, 2007, dated Mar. 24, 2009. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/GB2006/000697 filed Feb. 28, 2006, dated Sep. 11, 2007. |
International Search Report for PCT/GB2006/000697 dated May 3, 2006. |
GB Search Report for GB 0504321.1 dated Jun. 27, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130238004 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12593461 | US | |
Child | 13867174 | US |