For many water and gas utilities, water and gas meters are mechanical, and they are typically read manually once a month. Water and gas utilities are transitioning toward automated measurement and communication of water and gas usage. There is a need for improved electronic water and gas meters with automatic communication of usage.
One known technology for measuring fluid velocity is ultrasound. Ultrasound velocity meters may be attached externally to pipes, and fluid velocity may be measured by time of flight of an ultrasonic signal through the fluid, or by measuring the ultrasonic Doppler effect, or by other ultrasound signal processing techniques. Fluid flow may be measured by multiplying fluid velocity by the interior area of a pipe. Cumulative fluid volume may be measured by integrating fluid flow over time. Separately, there have been studies using ultrasound to communicate through water pipes. In general, these are independent techniques. That is, the ultrasound parameters (for example, frequency) for a transducer optimized for fluid velocity measurement are typically not optimal for communication and vice versa. In the following discussion, a metering system may use the same ultrasonic transducers for both fluid velocity measurement and for communication. Optionally, the metering system may also detect leaks, pipe corrosion, and cracks in a pipe. Optionally, the metering system may also receive a wireless or ultrasonic time-synchronization signal.
The pipeline system 100 may be located, for example, in a utility tunnel in the interior of a building or in the basement of a building. Alternatively, the pipeline system 100 may be located, for example, in an underground conduit or utility tunnel, perhaps under a street or within a utility right-of-way. Alternatively, the pipeline system 100 may be buried underground, for example, within a suburban neighborhood, or in a turf sprinkler system or other irrigation system. In general, the pipeline system 100 may be located such that electronic communication and in particular wireless communication from flow meters along the pipeline system 100 may be difficult at times. In particular, attenuation of wireless signals inside the ground is 20-30 dB/m, depending on moisture content. As will be described in more detail below, metering data in the example pipeline system 100 may be relayed point-to-point along the pipe 102 until eventually reaching a communications system that can communicate aggregate metering data to a utility company. In the example of
In the example of
The ultrasonic transducers may alternate roles as transmitter and receiver for measuring fluid velocity. For example, ultrasonic transducer 202 may transmit and ultrasonic transducer 204 may receive, and then ultrasonic transducer 204 may transmit and ultrasonic transducer 204 may receive. Controller 212 may measure the time-of-flight of the ultrasonic pressure waves from the transmitter to the receiver. Flowing fluid in the pipe will cause the down-stream time-of-flight to be slightly different than the up-stream time of flight, and that slight difference may be used to measure the velocity of the fluid. Time-of-flight may be measured directly by measuring the time from when a signal is transmitted until a signal is received. This may be achieved by a zero-crossing detector that gets triggered by a signal-level threshold. The zero-crossing detector may be implemented using a time-to-digital converter (TDC). However, the received signal may be noisy, causing some timing inaccuracy due to the signal-level threshold. Alternatively, an analog-to-digital converter may be used to quantize and store the whole waveform. Then, cross-correlation may be used to measure how much one waveform is shifted in time relative to another waveform. The transmitted waveform may be cross-correlated with the received waveform, which uses the entire waveforms and therefore does not depend on just the signal level of the leading portion of the received waveform.
In addition to measuring fluid velocity, one of the ultrasonic transducers (202, 204) may be used to transmit data along the pipes to another flow meter or to a communications system. One of the ultrasonic transducers (which may be the same as the one used for data transmission) may be used to receive data from another flow meter. The ultrasonic pressure waves will travel along the fluid/pipe system. That is, the signal may travel by bulk wave propagation in the fluid and in the wall of the pipe. Experiments have shown that signal strength goes down if the signal is blocked from traveling in the fluid but is allowed to travel within the wall of the pipe, and the signal strength goes down even more if the signal is blocked from traveling within the wall of the pipe but is allowed to travel just within the fluid.
An ultrasound transducer (202, 204) may be used for measuring fluid velocity and also for data communication. For accurate measurement of fluid or gas velocity, especially at low velocities, a high ultrasound frequency is needed (>1 MHz). Typically, ultrasound transducers have a resonant frequency and they can be operated only at frequencies close to their resonant frequency. Fluids attenuate ultrasound signals more at higher frequencies than at lower frequencies. Typically, for ultrasonic communication, low frequencies (for example, 40 KHz) are used to maximize communication distance. Typically, an ultrasonic transducer intended for operation at frequencies over 1 MHz would not be suitable for operation at 40 KHz. However, a network of flow meters in a building or even in a suburban area may be spaced sufficiently close together to enable a high frequency to be used for both fluid velocity measurement and for communication. With an ultrasound transducer being operated at 1.3 MHz for both velocity measurement and communication, and with the transducer directly coupled to water, communication distances of 20-30 meters for water in a galvanized iron pipe are feasible. In general, ultrasound signals are stronger in water than in air or gas, and ultrasound signals are stronger in metal pipes than in plastic pipes. Communication distances for gas, or for polyvinylchloride (PVC) pipes may be less than communication distances for water in a galvanized pipe. Ultrasonic repeaters may be used where necessary. Alternatively, where necessary, communication distances may also be extended substantially by using a separate lower frequency transducer for communication. In
If the same frequency is used for flow measurement and for communication, then time multiplexing may be needed to avoid interference between flow measurement and communication, and to ensure that flow meters do not transmit simultaneously.
At least coarse time synchronization between flow meters may have to be implemented so that each flow meter will measure flow during times allocated for measurement and each flow meter will transmit or receive data during times allocated for communication. When the flow meters are first installed the internal clocks used by the microprocessors or microcontrollers may be sufficiently accurate for time-multiplexed communication for some period of time. However, as will be discussed further below, the batteries for the flow meters are expected to last for more than ten years, so eventually some automatic time synchronization may be required. For example, periodically (for example, once a week or once a month), the time-multiplexed meter-to-meter communication depicted in
Alternatively, wireless radio-frequency (RF) signals may be used for synchronization. The battery operated flow meters need to be low power, so it may be impractical for a flow meter to transmit a high-power wireless RF signal through structures or through the ground. However, it may be practical for a flow-meter to receive a wireless RF signal from a high-power transmitter, even if the signal has been attenuated by structures or by the ground. A high-power transmitter may be connected to an AC main, and may be located above ground or in a building, and can transmit at a much higher power than a battery powered flow meter. The high-power transmitter may be used only for time synchronization of the flow meters. In
Ultrasound communications may use any of the techniques used by electronic communication for transmitting data by modulating a carrier frequency. Examples include Frequency Shift Keying (FSK), Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK), and Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK). Redundancy and error correction codes may be included to reduce transmission errors.
A typical measurement cycle for automatic water and gas metering is one flow measurement every two seconds with an averaging over 20 seconds. For an ultrasonic flow meter with communication as in
Ultrasonic flow meters with frequent communication enable detection of problems that may not be detected with meters that are checked infrequently. For example, two flow meters on the same pipe may be used for leak detection. If flow is higher at an up-stream meter compared to a down-stream meter then fluid may be leaking out somewhere between the meters. As another example, flow in a pipe dedicated to an overhead fire suppression system may indicate that overhead sprinklers are flowing, possibly indicating a fire and/or imminent water damage. As another example, flow in an irrigation system for a long period of time or at an unusual time may indicate a leak or a broken pipe. Similarly, an unusually high flow rate over a long period of time during freezing weather may indicate a pipe that has burst from freezing.
Given the proper wavelength and incidence angle for the ultrasonic signal, the interior and exterior surfaces of the wall of a pipe may act as an acoustic waveguide, where guided waves may travel long distances without substantial attenuation. These guided waves depend on constructive interference of reflections from the surfaces of the walls of the pipe. Just as an electrical impedance mismatch in an electrical waveguide results in an electrical signal reflection, an acoustic impedance mismatch in an acoustic waveguide results in an acoustic signal reflection. In particular, a small crack in the wall of the pipe will result in a partially reflected signal, and a rough corroded surface will result in many small reflected signals. A transducer may transmit a signal, and then measure the resulting reflections. The time for a large reflection to return to the transducer may be used as a measure of distance to a discontinuity in the pipe wall, such as a crack. Overall noise level in the reflected signals over multiple transit times may be used as a measure of corrosion. Alternatively, shortly after installation of a flow meter, the flow meter may store a calibration profile of reflected signal strength as a function of time. Then, periodically, the reflection profile may be measured again and compared to the calibration profile. Significant changes in the profile may indicate corrosion or cracks. In
In general, guided waves travel longer distances than the bulk wave propagation discussed earlier, so an ultrasonic transducer used for guided waves may also be used for communication over longer distances. A specific type of waveform is needed for guided waves, and this waveform may be modulated for communication between transducers.
Alternatively, in
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/860,409 filed Apr. 10, 2013 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,508,937), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/623,229 filed Apr. 12, 2012, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2912856 | Kritz | Nov 1959 | A |
3568661 | Franklin | Mar 1971 | A |
3987674 | Baumoel | Oct 1976 | A |
4031757 | Colton | Jun 1977 | A |
4045767 | Nishihara et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4162635 | Triplett et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4320666 | Redding | Mar 1982 | A |
4336719 | Lynnworth | Jun 1982 | A |
4380934 | Okuda | Apr 1983 | A |
4483202 | Ogura et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4520320 | Potzick | May 1985 | A |
4581942 | Ogura et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4754650 | Smalling | Jul 1988 | A |
5372047 | Russwurm et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5460047 | Jacobson | Oct 1995 | A |
5546359 | Aarseth | Aug 1996 | A |
5639972 | Hasting et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5995449 | Green | Nov 1999 | A |
6098467 | Wallen | Aug 2000 | A |
6127942 | Welle | Oct 2000 | A |
6400646 | Shah | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408699 | Moss | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6532828 | Delsing | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556142 | Dunstan | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6634239 | Gomm | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6694824 | Shinmura | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6748808 | Lam et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6776051 | Suzuki | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6941821 | Umekage | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950768 | Freund, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7194363 | Schaffer | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7237441 | Umekage | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252015 | Konzelmann et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7304587 | Boaz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319411 | Ong | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7360449 | Umekage | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7400264 | Boaz | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7654148 | Tomlinson, Jr. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7762118 | Buchanan | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7796466 | Combee et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7810399 | van Klooster | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7835226 | Kokosalakis | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8103461 | Glaser et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8170812 | Straub | May 2012 | B2 |
8181535 | Huang | May 2012 | B2 |
8220484 | Howitt | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8365601 | Minachi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8422337 | Su et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8489342 | Dugger | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499634 | Urbano | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8605548 | Froelich | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626295 | Doron | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8694270 | Huang | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700344 | Wilson | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8701501 | Miyata et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8843241 | Saberi | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8854985 | Tsfaty | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8955392 | Liu et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8978476 | Ao et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9080908 | Yoder | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9219955 | Imran | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9255910 | Volker et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9361877 | Antonio | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9410833 | Leaders | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9631486 | Millot | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9874466 | Leaders | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10031011 | Ferencz | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10313027 | Ouzounov | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10534377 | Dolezilek | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10961846 | Jin | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20030101804 | Zanker | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20060012491 | Mahowald | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080132185 | Elliott | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156107 | Ao | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177678 | Di Martini | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080250869 | Breed | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100027379 | Saulnier | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100288055 | Mueller | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110317744 | Erickson | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120250461 | Millot et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265454 | Rudd | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272749 | Lang | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20160313157 | Nikolovski | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Hayes, H. D.; Akerman, M. A .; Baylor, V. M. “Final Report, Ultrasonic Communication Project, Phase 1, FY 1999,” National Security Program Office, Jun. 2000, 115 pages. |
Rose, Joseph L., “Ultrasonic Guided Waves In Structural Health Monitoring,” Key Engineering Materials, vols. 270-273 (2004), pp. 14-22. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200116536 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61623229 | Apr 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13860409 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 16714983 | US |