Piezoelectric materials facilitate conversion between mechanical energy and electrical energy. Moreover, a piezoelectric material can generate an electrical signal when subjected to mechanical stress, and can vibrate when subjected to an electrical voltage. Piezoelectric materials are widely utilized in piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers to generate acoustic waves based on an actuation voltage applied to electrodes of the piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the Description of Embodiments, illustrate various embodiments of the subject matter and, together with the Description of Embodiments, serve to explain principles of the subject matter discussed below. Unless specifically noted, the drawings referred to in this Brief Description of Drawings should be understood as not being drawn to scale. Herein, like items are labeled with like item numbers.
The following Description of Embodiments is merely provided by way of example and not of limitation. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding background or in the following Description of Embodiments.
Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments of the subject matter, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While various embodiments are discussed herein, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit to these embodiments. On the contrary, the presented embodiments are intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope the various embodiments as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in this Description of Embodiments, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present subject matter. However, embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the described embodiments.
Some portions of the detailed descriptions which follow are presented in terms of procedures, logic blocks, processing and other symbolic representations of operations on data within an electrical device. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. In the present application, a procedure, logic block, process, or the like, is conceived to be one or more self-consistent procedures or instructions leading to a desired result. The procedures are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, although not necessarily, these quantities take the form of acoustic (e.g., ultrasonic) signals capable of being transmitted and received by an electronic device and/or electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in an electrical device.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the description of embodiments, discussions utilizing terms such as “adjusting” “determining,” “controlling,” “activating,” “detecting,” “interacting,” “capturing,” “sensing,” “generating,” “imaging,” “performing,” “comparing,” “updating,” “transmitting,” “sensing,” or the like, refer to the actions and processes of an electronic device such as an electrical device.
Embodiments described herein may be discussed in the general context of processor-executable instructions residing on some form of non-transitory processor-readable medium, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
In the figures, a single block may be described as performing a function or functions; however, in actual practice, the function or functions performed by that block may be performed in a single component or across multiple components, and/or may be performed using hardware, using software, or using a combination of hardware and software. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, logic, circuits, and steps have been described generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present disclosure. Also, the example fingerprint sensing system and/or mobile electronic device described herein may include components other than those shown, including well-known components.
Various techniques described herein may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof, unless specifically described as being implemented in a specific manner. Any features described as modules or components may also be implemented together in an integrated logic device or separately as discrete but interoperable logic devices. If implemented in software, the techniques may be realized at least in part by a non-transitory processor-readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed, perform one or more of the methods described herein. The non-transitory processor-readable data storage medium may form part of a computer program product, which may include packaging materials.
The non-transitory processor-readable storage medium may comprise random access memory (RAM) such as synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM), read only memory (ROM), non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), FLASH memory, other known storage media, and the like. The techniques additionally, or alternatively, may be realized at least in part by a processor-readable communication medium that carries or communicates code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed, read, and/or executed by a computer or other processor.
Various embodiments described herein may be executed by one or more processors, such as one or more motion processing units (MPUs), sensor processing units (SPUs), host processor(s) or core(s) thereof, digital signal processors (DSPs), general purpose microprocessors, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), application specific instruction set processors (ASIPs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), a programmable logic controller (PLC), a complex programmable logic device (CPLD), a discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein, or other equivalent integrated or discrete logic circuitry. The term “processor,” as used herein may refer to any of the foregoing structures or any other structure suitable for implementation of the techniques described herein. As it employed in the subject specification, the term “processor” can refer to substantially any computing processing unit or device comprising, but not limited to comprising, single-core processors; single-processors with software multithread execution capability; multi-core processors; multi-core processors with software multithread execution capability; multi-core processors with hardware multithread technology; parallel platforms; and parallel platforms with distributed shared memory. Moreover, processors can exploit nano-scale architectures such as, but not limited to, molecular and quantum-dot based transistors, switches and gates, in order to optimize space usage or enhance performance of user equipment. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing processing units.
In addition, in some aspects, the functionality described herein may be provided within dedicated software modules or hardware modules configured as described herein. Also, the techniques could be fully implemented in one or more circuits or logic elements. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of an SPU/MPU and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with an SPU core, MPU core, or any other such configuration.
Discussion begins with a description of an example piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer (PMUT), in accordance with various embodiments. Example arrays including PMUT devices are then described. Example operations of example arrays of ultrasonic transducers (e.g., PMUT devices) are then further described. Examples of an ultrasonic transducer (e.g., a PMUT device) including a non-uniform membrane, are then described.
A conventional piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer able to generate and detect pressure waves can include a membrane with the piezoelectric material, a supporting layer, and electrodes combined with a cavity beneath the electrodes. Miniaturized versions are referred to as PMUTs. Typical PMUTs use an edge anchored membrane or diaphragm that maximally oscillates at or near the center of the membrane at a resonant frequency (1) proportional to h/a2, where h is the thickness, and a is the radius of the membrane. Higher frequency membrane oscillations can be created by increasing the membrane thickness, decreasing the membrane radius, or both. Increasing the membrane thickness has its limits, as the increased thickness limits the displacement of the membrane. Reducing the PMUT membrane radius also has limits, because a larger percentage of PMUT membrane area is used for edge anchoring.
Embodiments described herein relate to a PMUT device for ultrasonic wave generation and sensing. In accordance with various embodiments, an array of such PMUT devices is described. The PMUT includes a substrate and an edge support structure connected to the substrate. In one embodiment, a non-uniform membrane is connected to the edge support structure such that a cavity is defined between the membrane and the substrate, where the non-uniform membrane is configured to allow movement at ultrasonic frequencies. In accordance with the described embodiments, a non-uniform membrane comprises regions of different stiffness, such that the different regions have different mechanical and flexural properties. In various embodiments, the non-uniform membrane includes a mechanical support layer (e.g., a stiffening layer), a piezoelectric layer and first and second electrodes coupled to opposing sides of the piezoelectric layer.
In accordance with various embodiments, the edge support structure of the PMUT device is structurally compliant to provide for non-uniform movement of the membrane. In such embodiments, the membrane itself may be uniform or non-uniform. In some embodiments, an interior support structure is disposed within the cavity and connected to the substrate and the membrane. The interior support structure may also be structurally compliant to allow for non-uniform movement of the membrane.
It should be appreciated that the embodiments described herein provide for non-uniform displacement of the membrane of an ultrasonic transducer (e.g., a PMUT). For example, the non-uniform movement may be achieved through a non-uniform membrane (e.g., a membrane including regions of different stiffness), structurally compliant edge supports, and structurally compliant interior supports, either alone or in any combination. In various embodiments, the acoustic output and the frequency of a PMUT are designed by controlling the physical properties of various components of the PMUT device, such as the membrane, the edge supports and the interior supports.
The described PMUT device and array of PMUT devices can be used for generation of acoustic signals or measurement of acoustically sensed data in various applications, such as, but not limited to, medical applications, security systems, biometric systems (e.g., fingerprint sensors and/or motion/gesture recognition sensors), mobile communication systems, industrial automation systems, consumer electronic devices, robotics, etc. In one embodiment, the PMUT device can facilitate ultrasonic signal generation and sensing (transducer). Moreover, embodiments described herein provide a sensing component including a silicon wafer having a two-dimensional (or one-dimensional) array of ultrasonic transducers.
Embodiments described herein provide a PMUT that operates at a high frequency for reduced acoustic diffraction through high acoustic velocity materials (e.g., glass, metal), and for shorter pulses so that spurious reflections can be time-gated out. Embodiments described herein also provide a PMUT that has a low quality factor providing a shorter ring-up and ring-down time to allow better rejection of spurious reflections by time-gating. Embodiments described herein also provide a PMUT that has a high fill-factor providing for large transmit and receive signals.
In accordance with various embodiments, a PMUT device includes a substrate, an edge support structure connected to the substrate, and a membrane connected to the edge support structure such that a cavity is defined between the membrane and the substrate, the membrane configured to allow movement at ultrasonic frequencies, the membrane having non-uniform stiffness. The membrane includes a piezoelectric layer, a first electrode and a second electrode coupled to opposing sides of the piezoelectric layer, and a mechanical support layer coupled to one of the first electrode and the second electrode.
In one embodiment, a first region of the membrane has a first stiffness and a second region of the membrane has a second stiffness. In one embodiment, the first region of the membrane is a peripheral region and the second region of the membrane is an interior region. In one embodiment, a thickness of the first region of the membrane is different than a thickness of the second region of the membrane. In one embodiment, the mechanical support layer defines a continuous layer, and wherein a thickness of the mechanical support layer of the first region of the membrane is different than a thickness of the mechanical support layer of the second region of the membrane. In one embodiment, the first region of the membrane includes a void, such that the first stiffness is less than the second stiffness. In one embodiment, the second region of the membrane includes a void, such that the second stiffness is less than the first stiffness. In one embodiment, the first region of the membrane includes a material not comprised within the second region of the membrane. In one embodiment, the second region of the membrane includes a material not comprised within the first region of the membrane.
In one embodiment, the membrane further includes a compliant anchor disposed within the peripheral region of the membrane such that the membrane is connected to the edge support structure via the compliant anchor, the compliant anchor having the first stiffness. In one embodiment, the compliant anchor includes a different material makeup than a portion of the membrane not comprising the compliant anchor. In one embodiment, the edge support structure is structurally compliant. In one embodiment, the PMUT further includes an interior support structure disposed within the cavity and connected to the substrate and the membrane. In one embodiment, the interior support structure is structurally compliant. In one embodiment, the membrane is non-planar.
In accordance with one embodiment, a PMUT device includes a substrate, a structurally compliant edge support structure connected to the substrate, and a membrane connected to the structurally compliant edge support structure such that a cavity is defined between the membrane and the substrate, the membrane configured to allow movement at ultrasonic frequencies, wherein the structurally compliant edge support structure provides for non-uniform movement of the membrane. The membrane includes a piezoelectric layer, a first electrode and a second electrode coupled to opposing sides of the piezoelectric layer, and a mechanical support layer coupled to one of the first electrode and the second electrode.
In one embodiment, the structurally compliant edge support structure includes a compliant anchor for providing the non-uniform movement of the membrane. In one embodiment, the structurally compliant edge support structure includes voids. In one embodiment, the membrane has non-uniform stiffness. In one embodiment, the PMUT further includes an interior support structure disposed within the cavity and connected to the substrate and the membrane. In one embodiment, the interior support structure is structurally compliant.
In accordance with various embodiments, a PMUT array includes a plurality of PMUT devices, wherein at least one PMUT device of the plurality of PMUT devices includes a substrate, an edge support structure connected to the substrate, and a membrane connected to the edge support structure such that a cavity is defined between the membrane and the substrate, the membrane configured to allow movement at ultrasonic frequencies, the membrane having non-uniform stiffness. The membrane includes a piezoelectric layer, a first electrode and a second electrode coupled to opposing sides of the piezoelectric layer, and a mechanical support layer coupled to one of the first electrode and the second electrode. The PMUT array further includes an acoustic coupling layer overlying the plurality of PMUT devices.
In one embodiment, a peripheral region of the membrane has a first stiffness and an interior region of the membrane has a second stiffness. In one embodiment, a thickness of the peripheral region of the membrane is different than a thickness of the interior region of the membrane. In one embodiment, the peripheral region of the membrane includes a material not comprised within the interior region of the membrane. In one embodiment, the interior region of the membrane includes a material not comprised within the peripheral region of the membrane.
In one embodiment, the at least one PMUT device further includes a compliant anchor disposed within the peripheral region of the membrane such that the membrane is connected to the edge support structure via the compliant anchor, the compliant anchor having a third stiffness. In one embodiment, the at least one PMUT device of the plurality of PMUT devices further includes an interior support structure disposed within the cavity and connected to the substrate and the membrane.
Systems and methods disclosed herein, provide efficient structures for an acoustic transducer (e.g., a piezoelectric micromachined actuated transducer or PMUT). One or more embodiments are now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments. It may be evident, however, that the various embodiments can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing the embodiments in additional detail.
As used in this application, the term “or” is intended to mean an inclusive “or” rather than an exclusive “or”. That is, unless specified otherwise, or clear from context, “X employs A or B” is intended to mean any of the natural inclusive permutations. That is, if X employs A; X employs B; or X employs both A and B, then “X employs A or B” is satisfied under any of the foregoing instances. In addition, the articles “a” and “an” as used in this application and the appended claims should generally be construed to mean “one or more” unless specified otherwise or clear from context to be directed to a singular form. In addition, the word “coupled” is used herein to mean direct or indirect electrical or mechanical coupling. In addition, the word “example” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration.
In one embodiment, both edge support 102 and interior support 104 are attached to a substrate 140. In various embodiments, substrate 140 may include at least one of, and without limitation, silicon or silicon nitride. It should be appreciated that substrate 140 may include electrical wirings and connection, such as aluminum or copper. In one embodiment, substrate 140 includes a CMOS logic wafer bonded to edge support 102 and interior support 104. In one embodiment, the membrane 120 comprises multiple layers. In an example embodiment, the membrane 120 includes lower electrode 106, piezoelectric layer 110, and upper electrode 108, where lower electrode 106 and upper electrode 108 are coupled to opposing sides of piezoelectric layer 110. As shown, lower electrode 106 is coupled to a lower surface of piezoelectric layer 110 and upper electrode 108 is coupled to an upper surface of piezoelectric layer 110. It should be appreciated that, in various embodiments, PMUT device 100 is a microelectromechanical (MEMS) device.
In one embodiment, membrane 120 also includes a mechanical support layer 112 (e.g., stiffening layer) to mechanically stiffen the layers. In various embodiments, mechanical support layer 112 may include at least one of, and without limitation, silicon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, aluminum, molybdenum, titanium, etc. In one embodiment, PMUT device 100 also includes an acoustic coupling layer 114 above membrane 120 for supporting transmission of acoustic signals. It should be appreciated that acoustic coupling layer can include air, liquid, gel-like materials, epoxy, or other materials for supporting transmission of acoustic signals. In one embodiment, PMUT device 100 also includes platen layer 116 above acoustic coupling layer 114 for containing acoustic coupling layer 114 and providing a contact surface for a finger or other sensed object with PMUT device 100. It should be appreciated that, in various embodiments, acoustic coupling layer 114 provides a contact surface, such that platen layer 116 is optional. Moreover, it should be appreciated that acoustic coupling layer 114 and/or platen layer 116 may be included with or used in conjunction with multiple PMUT devices. For example, an array of PMUT devices may be coupled with a single acoustic coupling layer 114 and/or platen layer 116.
The described PMUT device 100 can be used with almost any electrical device that converts a pressure wave into mechanical vibrations and/or electrical signals. In one embodiment, the PMUT device 100 can comprise an acoustic sensing element (e.g., a piezoelectric element) that generates and senses ultrasonic sound waves. An object in a path of the generated sound waves can create a disturbance (e.g., changes in frequency or phase, reflection signal, echoes, etc.) that can then be sensed. The interference can be analyzed to determine physical parameters such as (but not limited to) distance, density and/or speed of the object. As an example, the PMUT device 100 can be utilized in various applications, such as, but not limited to, fingerprint or physiologic sensors suitable for wireless devices, industrial systems, automotive systems, robotics, telecommunications, security, medical devices, etc. For example, the PMUT device 100 can be part of a sensor array comprising a plurality of ultrasonic transducers deposited on a wafer, along with various logic, control and communication electronics. A sensor array may comprise homogenous or identical PMUT devices 100, or a number of different or heterogonous device structures.
In various embodiments, the PMUT device 100 employs a piezoelectric layer 110, comprised of materials such as, but not limited to, Aluminum nitride (AlN), lead zirconate titanate (PZT), quartz, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and/or zinc oxide, to facilitate both acoustic signal production and sensing. The piezoelectric layer 110 can generate electric charges under mechanical stress and conversely experience a mechanical strain in the presence of an electric field. For example, the piezoelectric layer 110 can sense mechanical vibrations caused by an ultrasonic signal and produce an electrical charge at the frequency (e.g., ultrasonic frequency) of the vibrations. Additionally, the piezoelectric layer 110 can generate an ultrasonic wave by vibrating in an oscillatory fashion that might be at the same frequency (e.g., ultrasonic frequency) as an input current generated by an alternating current (AC) voltage applied across the piezoelectric layer 110. It should be appreciated that the piezoelectric layer 110 can include almost any material (or combination of materials) that exhibits piezoelectric properties, such that the structure of the material does not have a center of symmetry and a tensile or compressive stress applied to the material alters the separation between positive and negative charge sites in a cell causing a polarization at the surface of the material. The polarization is directly proportional to the applied stress and is direction dependent so that compressive and tensile stresses results in electric fields of opposite polarizations.
Further, the PMUT device 100 comprises electrodes 106 and 108 that supply and/or collect the electrical charge to/from the piezoelectric layer 110. It should be appreciated that electrodes 106 and 108 can be continuous and/or patterned electrodes (e.g., in a continuous layer and/or a patterned layer). For example, as illustrated, electrode 106 is a patterned electrode and electrode 108 is a continuous electrode. As an example, electrodes 106 and 108 can be comprised of almost any metal layers, such as, but not limited to, Aluminum (Al)/Titanium (Ti), Molybdenum (Mo), etc., which are coupled with and on opposing sides of the piezoelectric layer 110. In one embodiment, PMUT device also includes a third electrode, as illustrated in
According to an embodiment, the acoustic impedance of acoustic coupling layer 114 is selected to be similar to the acoustic impedance of the platen layer 116, such that the acoustic wave is efficiently propagated to/from the membrane 120 through acoustic coupling layer 114 and platen layer 116. As an example, the platen layer 116 can comprise various materials having an acoustic impedance in the range between 0.8 to 4 MRayl, such as, but not limited to, plastic, resin, rubber, Teflon, epoxy, etc. In another example, the platen layer 116 can comprise various materials having a high acoustic impedance (e.g., an acoustic impendence greater than 10 MiRayl), such as, but not limited to, glass, aluminum-based alloys, sapphire, etc. Typically, the platen layer 116 can be selected based on an application of the sensor. For instance, in fingerprinting applications, platen layer 116 can have an acoustic impedance that matches (e.g., exactly or approximately) the acoustic impedance of human skin (e.g., 1.6×106 Rayl). Further, in one embodiment, the platen layer 116 can further include a thin layer of anti-scratch material. In various embodiments, the anti-scratch layer of the platen layer 116 is less than the wavelength of the acoustic wave that is to be generated and/or sensed to provide minimum interference during propagation of the acoustic wave. As an example, the anti-scratch layer can comprise various hard and scratch-resistant materials (e.g., having a Mohs hardness of over 7 on the Mohs scale), such as, but not limited to sapphire, glass, MN, Titanium nitride (TiN), Silicon carbide (SiC), diamond, etc. As an example, PMUT device 100 can operate at 20 MHz and accordingly, the wavelength of the acoustic wave propagating through the acoustic coupling layer 114 and platen layer 116 can be 70-150 microns. In this example scenario, insertion loss can be reduced and acoustic wave propagation efficiency can be improved by utilizing an anti-scratch layer having a thickness of 1 micron and the platen layer 116 as a whole having a thickness of 1-2 millimeters. It is noted that the term “anti-scratch material” as used herein relates to a material that is resistant to scratches and/or scratch-proof and provides substantial protection against scratch marks.
In accordance with various embodiments, the PMUT device 100 can include metal layers (e.g., Aluminum (Al)/Titanium (Ti), Molybdenum (Mo), etc.) patterned to form electrode 106 in particular shapes (e.g., ring, circle, square, octagon, hexagon, etc.) that are defined in-plane with the membrane 120. Electrodes can be placed at a maximum strain area of the membrane 120 or placed at close to either or both the surrounding edge support 102 and interior support 104. Furthermore, in one example, electrode 108 can be formed as a continuous layer providing a ground plane in contact with mechanical support layer 112, which can be formed from silicon or other suitable mechanical stiffening material. In still other embodiments, the electrode 106 can be routed along the interior support 104, advantageously reducing parasitic capacitance as compared to routing along the edge support 102.
For example, when actuation voltage is applied to the electrodes, the membrane 120 will deform and move out of plane. The motion then pushes the acoustic coupling layer 114 it is in contact with and an acoustic (ultrasonic) wave is generated. Oftentimes, vacuum is present inside the cavity 130 and therefore damping contributed from the media within the cavity 130 can be ignored. However, the acoustic coupling layer 114 on the other side of the membrane 120 can substantially change the damping of the PMUT device 100. For example, a quality factor greater than 20 can be observed when the PMUT device 100 is operating in air with atmosphere pressure (e.g., acoustic coupling layer 114 is air) and can decrease lower than 2 if the PMUT device 100 is operating in water (e.g., acoustic coupling layer 114 is water).
In operation, during transmission, selected sets of PMUT devices in the two-dimensional array can transmit an acoustic signal (e.g., a short ultrasonic pulse) and during sensing, the set of active PMUT devices in the two-dimensional array can detect an interference of the acoustic signal with an object (in the path of the acoustic wave). The received interference signal (e.g., generated based on reflections, echoes, etc. of the acoustic signal from the object) can then be analyzed. As an example, an image of the object, a distance of the object from the sensing component, a density of the object, a motion of the object, etc., can all be determined based on comparing a frequency and/or phase of the interference signal with a frequency and/or phase of the acoustic signal. Moreover, results generated can be further analyzed or presented to a user via a display device (not shown).
For example, interior supports structures do not have to be centrally located with a PMUT device area, but can be non-centrally positioned within the cavity. As illustrated in
In this example for fingerprinting applications, the human finger 1252 and the processing logic module 1240 can determine, based on a difference in interference of the acoustic signal with valleys and/or ridges of the skin on the finger, an image depicting epi-dermis and/or dermis layers of the finger. Further, the processing logic module 1240 can compare the image with a set of known fingerprint images to facilitate identification and/or authentication. Moreover, in one example, if a match (or substantial match) is found, the identity of user can be verified. In another example, if a match (or substantial match) is found, a command/operation can be performed based on an authorization rights assigned to the identified user. In yet another example, the identified user can be granted access to a physical location and/or network/computer resources (e.g., documents, files, applications, etc.)
In another example, for finger-based applications, the movement of the finger can be used for cursor tracking/movement applications. In such embodiments, a pointer or cursor on a display screen can be moved in response to finger movement. It is noted that processing logic module 1240 can include or be connected to one or more processors configured to confer at least in part the functionality of system 1250. To that end, the one or more processors can execute code instructions stored in memory, for example, volatile memory and/or nonvolatile memory.
Devices and methods disclosed herein provide an ultrasonic transducer (e.g., a PMUT) having a non-uniform membrane. One or more embodiments are now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments. It may be evident, however, that the various embodiments can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing the embodiments in additional detail.
In one embodiment, edge support 102 is attached to a substrate 140. In various embodiments, substrate 140 may include at least one of, and without limitation, silicon or silicon nitride. It should be appreciated that substrate 140 may include electrical wirings and connection, such as aluminum or copper. In one embodiment, substrate 140 includes a CMOS logic wafer bonded to edge support 102. In one embodiment, the membrane 120 comprises multiple layers. In an example embodiment, the membrane 120 includes lower electrode 106, piezoelectric layer 110, and upper electrode 108, where lower electrode 106 and upper electrode 108 are coupled to opposing sides of piezoelectric layer 110. As shown, lower electrode 106 is coupled to a lower surface of piezoelectric layer 110 and upper electrode 108 is coupled to an upper surface of piezoelectric layer 110. It should be appreciated that, in various embodiments, PMUT device 1400 is a microelectromechanical (MEMS) device.
In one embodiment, membrane 120 also includes a mechanical support layer 112 (e.g., stiffening layer) to mechanically stiffen the layers. In various embodiments, mechanical support layer 112 may include at least one of, and without limitation, silicon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, aluminum, molybdenum, titanium, etc. In some embodiments, membrane 120 is a non-uniform membrane having non-uniform stiffness to provide for non-uniform movement of membrane 120.
In one embodiment, PMUT device 1400 also includes an acoustic coupling layer 114 above membrane 120 for supporting transmission of acoustic signals. It should be appreciated that acoustic coupling layer can include air, liquid, gel-like materials, epoxy, or other materials for supporting transmission of acoustic signals. In one embodiment, PMUT device 1400 also includes platen layer 116 above acoustic coupling layer 114 for containing acoustic coupling layer 114 and providing a contact surface for a finger or other sensed object with PMUT device 1400. It should be appreciated that, in various embodiments, acoustic coupling layer 114 provides a contact surface, such that platen layer 116 is optional. Moreover, it should be appreciated that acoustic coupling layer 114 and/or platen layer 116 may be included with or used in conjunction with multiple PMUT devices 1400. For example, an array of PMUT devices 1400 may be coupled with a single acoustic coupling layer 114 and/or platen layer 116.
PMUT device 1400 includes compliant anchor 150 coupled to membrane 120 and edge support 102. In accordance with various embodiments, compliant anchor 150 has stiffness different than the stiffness of membrane 120. In one embodiment, the stiffness of compliant anchor 150 is less than the stiffness of membrane 120. In another embodiment, the stiffness of compliant anchor 150 is greater than the stiffness of membrane 120. In one embodiment, compliant anchor 150 extends out from edge support 102 and over substrate 140, such that a bottom surface of compliant anchor 150 extends into cavity 130. It should be appreciated that the difference in stiffness between membrane 120 and compliant anchor 150 may be due to a different material makeup, a different thickness, voids in one of the membrane 120 and compliant anchor 150 reducing the amount of material, or any combination thereof. In effect, use of the compliant anchor 150 allows for control of the volumetric displacement of membrane 120 with respect to cavity 130. For example, where compliant anchor 150 has a stiffness less than the stiffness of membrane 120, compliant anchor 150 allows for greater volumetric displacement of the membrane 120 with respect to cavity 130 than would be provided by a continuous, uniform membrane.
In general, stiffness of a membrane is proportional to the Young's modulus of the material comprising the membrane and the cross-sectional area of the membrane. Accordingly, to change the stiffness of the membrane, or a region of the membrane, a different material makeup can be introduced into the membrane or material can be removed from the membrane. In one embodiment, the material(s) of compliant anchor 150 has a Young's modulus that is much than the Young's modulus of materials comprising the membrane 120. Some polymers, including epoxies can be used to form compliant anchor 150.
The described PMUT device 1400 can be used with almost any electrical device that converts a pressure wave into mechanical vibrations and/or electrical signals, as described above in accordance with
For example, when actuation voltage is applied to the electrodes, the membrane 120 and a portion of compliant anchor extending over cavity 130 will deform and move out of plane. The motion then pushes the acoustic coupling layer 114 it is in contact with and an acoustic (ultrasonic) wave is generated. Oftentimes, vacuum is present inside the cavity 130 and therefore damping contributed from the media within the cavity 130 can be ignored. However, the acoustic coupling layer 114 on the other side of the membrane 120 can substantially change the damping of the PMUT device 1400. For example, a quality factor greater than 20 can be observed when the PMUT device 1400 is operating in air with atmosphere pressure (e.g., acoustic coupling layer 114 is air) and can decrease lower than 2 if the PMUT device 1400 is operating in water (e.g., acoustic coupling layer 114 is water).
In one embodiment, both edge support 102 and interior support 104 are attached to a substrate 140. In various embodiments, substrate 140 may include at least one of, and without limitation, silicon or silicon nitride. It should be appreciated that substrate 140 may include electrical wirings and connection, such as aluminum or copper. In one embodiment, substrate 140 includes a CMOS logic wafer bonded to edge support 102 and interior support 104. In one embodiment, the membrane 120 comprises multiple layers. In an example embodiment, the membrane 120 includes lower electrode 106, piezoelectric layer 110, and upper electrode 108, where lower electrode 106 and upper electrode 108 are coupled to opposing sides of piezoelectric layer 110. As shown, lower electrode 106 is coupled to a lower surface of piezoelectric layer 110 and upper electrode 108 is coupled to an upper surface of piezoelectric layer 110. It should be appreciated that, in various embodiments, PMUT device 1600 is a microelectromechanical (MEMS) device.
In one embodiment, membrane 120 also includes a mechanical support layer 112 (e.g., stiffening layer) to mechanically stiffen the layers. In various embodiments, mechanical support layer 112 may include at least one of, and without limitation, silicon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, aluminum, molybdenum, titanium, etc. In some embodiments, membrane 120 is a non-uniform membrane having non-uniform stiffness to provide for non-uniform movement of membrane 120.
In one embodiment, PMUT device 1600 also includes an acoustic coupling layer 114 above membrane 120 for supporting transmission of acoustic signals. It should be appreciated that acoustic coupling layer can include air, liquid, gel-like materials, epoxy, or other materials for supporting transmission of acoustic signals. In one embodiment, PMUT device 1600 also includes platen layer 116 above acoustic coupling layer 114 for containing acoustic coupling layer 114 and providing a contact surface for a finger or other sensed object with PMUT device 1600. It should be appreciated that, in various embodiments, acoustic coupling layer 114 provides a contact surface, such that platen layer 116 is optional. Moreover, it should be appreciated that acoustic coupling layer 114 and/or platen layer 116 may be included with or used in conjunction with multiple PMUT devices 1600. For example, an array of PMUT devices 1600 may be coupled with a single acoustic coupling layer 114 and/or platen layer 116.
PMUT device 1600 includes compliant anchor 150 coupled to membrane 120 and edge support 102. In accordance with various embodiments, compliant anchor 150 has stiffness different than the stiffness of membrane 120. In one embodiment, the stiffness of compliant anchor 150 is less than the stiffness of membrane 120. In another embodiment, the stiffness of compliant anchor 150 is greater than the stiffness of membrane 120. In one embodiment, compliant anchor 150 extends out from edge support 102 and over substrate 140, such that a bottom surface of compliant anchor 150 extends into cavity 130. It should be appreciated that the difference in stiffness between membrane 120 and compliant anchor 150 may be due to a different material makeup, a different thickness, voids in one of the membrane 120 and compliant anchor 150 reducing the amount of material, or any combination thereof. In effect, use of the compliant anchor 150 allows for control of the volumetric displacement of membrane 120 with respect to cavity 130. For example, where compliant anchor 150 has a stiffness less than the stiffness of membrane 120, compliant anchor 150 allows for greater volumetric displacement of the membrane 120 with respect to cavity 130 than would be provided by a continuous, uniform membrane. In one embodiment, the material(s) of compliant anchor 150 has a Young's modulus that is much than the Young's modulus of materials comprising the membrane 120. Some polymers, including epoxies can be used to form compliant anchor 150.
The described PMUT device 1400 can be used with almost any electrical device that converts a pressure wave into mechanical vibrations and/or electrical signals, as described above in accordance with
For example, when actuation voltage is applied to the electrodes, the membrane 120 and a portion of compliant anchor extending over cavity 130 will deform and move out of plane. The motion then pushes the acoustic coupling layer 114 it is in contact with and an acoustic (ultrasonic) wave is generated. Oftentimes, vacuum is present inside the cavity 130 and therefore damping contributed from the media within the cavity 130 can be ignored. However, the acoustic coupling layer 114 on the other side of the membrane 120 can substantially change the damping of the PMUT device 1400. For example, a quality factor greater than 20 can be observed when the PMUT device 1400 is operating in air with atmosphere pressure (e.g., acoustic coupling layer 114 is air) and can decrease lower than 2 if the PMUT device 1400 is operating in water (e.g., acoustic coupling layer 114 is water).
For example, as illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, alternating PMUT device columns illustrate both center pinned PMUT devices 2550 and unpinned PMUT devices 2552. In one embodiment, unpinned PMUT devices 2552 have non-uniform membranes. In another embodiment, unpinned PMUT devices 2552 have non-uniform membranes with compliant attachment points along their respective peripheries.
What has been described above includes examples of the subject disclosure. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the subject matter, but it is to be appreciated that many further combinations and permutations of the subject disclosure are possible. Accordingly, the claimed subject matter is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
In particular and in regard to the various functions performed by the above described components, devices, circuits, systems and the like, the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component which performs the specified function of the described component (e.g., a functional equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure, which performs the function in the herein illustrated embodiments of the claimed subject matter.
The aforementioned systems and components have been described with respect to interaction between several components. It can be appreciated that such systems and components can include those components or specified sub-components, some of the specified components or sub-components, and/or additional components, and according to various permutations and combinations of the foregoing. Sub-components can also be implemented as components communicatively coupled to other components rather than included within parent components (hierarchical). Additionally, it should be noted that one or more components may be combined into a single component providing aggregate functionality or divided into several separate sub-components. Any components described herein may also interact with one or more other components not specifically described herein.
In addition, while a particular feature of the subject innovation may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “includes,” “including,” “has,” “contains,” variants thereof, and other similar words are used in either the detailed description or the claims, these terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as an open transition word without precluding any additional or other elements.
Thus, the embodiments and examples set forth herein were presented in order to best explain various selected embodiments of the present invention and its particular application and to thereby enable those skilled in the art to make and use embodiments of the invention. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the foregoing description and examples have been presented for the purposes of illustration and example only. The description as set forth is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments of the invention to the precise form disclosed.
This application claims also priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/334,408, filed on May 10, 2016, entitled “ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCERS USING NON-UNIFORM MEMBRANES,” by Renata Berger, and assigned to the assignee of the present application, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5575286 | Weng et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5684243 | Gururaja et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5808967 | Yu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5867302 | Fleming | Feb 1999 | A |
6071239 | Cribbs et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6104673 | Cole et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6289112 | Jain et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6350652 | Libera et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6428477 | Mason | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6500120 | Anthony | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6676602 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6736779 | Sano et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
7067962 | Scott | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7109642 | Scott | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7243547 | Cobianu et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7400750 | Nam | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7459836 | Scott | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471034 | Schlote-Holubek et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7489066 | Scott et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7739912 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8018010 | Tigli et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8139827 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8311514 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8335356 | Schmitt | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8433110 | Kropp et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8508103 | Schmitt et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8515135 | Clarke et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8666126 | Lee et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8703040 | Liufu et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8723399 | Sammoura et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8805031 | Schmitt | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9056082 | Liautaud et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9070861 | Bibl et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9224030 | Du et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9245165 | Slaby et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9424456 | Kamath Koteshwara et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9572549 | Belevich et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9582102 | Setlak | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9607203 | Yazdandoost et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9607206 | Schmitt et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9613246 | Gozzini et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9665763 | Du et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9747488 | Yazdandoost et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9785819 | Oreifej | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9815087 | Ganti et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9817108 | Kuo et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9818020 | Schuckers et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9881195 | Lee et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9881198 | Lee et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9898640 | Ghavanini | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9904836 | Yeke Yazdandoost et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9909225 | Lee et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9922235 | Cho et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9934371 | Hong et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9939972 | Shepelev et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9953205 | Rasmussen et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9959444 | Young et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9967100 | Hong et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9983656 | Merrell et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9984271 | King et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
10275638 | Yousefpor et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10315222 | Salvia et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10600403 | Garlepp et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20020135273 | Mauchamp et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030013955 | Poland | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040085858 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122316 | Satoh et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040174773 | Thomenius et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050057284 | Wodnicki | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100200 | Abiko et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110071 | Ema et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050146240 | Smith et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148132 | Wodnicki et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050162040 | Robert | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060052697 | Hossack et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079777 | Karasawa | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070046396 | Huang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070047785 | Jang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073135 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070202252 | Sasaki | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070215964 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230754 | Jain et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080125660 | Yao et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080150032 | Tanaka | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080194053 | Huang | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240523 | Benkley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090005684 | Kristoffersen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090182237 | Angelsen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090274343 | Clarke | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303838 | Svet | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030076 | Vortman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046810 | Yamada | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100168583 | Dausch et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195851 | Buccafusca | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201222 | Adachi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100202254 | Roest et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100239751 | Regniere | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251824 | Schneider et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100256498 | Tanaka | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278008 | Ammar | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110285244 | Lewis et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291207 | Martin et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016604 | Irving et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120092026 | Liautaud et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095347 | Adam et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120147698 | Wong et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120232396 | Tanabe | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238876 | Tanabe et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120279865 | Regniere et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288641 | Diatezua et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130051179 | Hong | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130064043 | Degertekin et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130127592 | Fyke et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133428 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130201134 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130294202 | Hajati | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140060196 | Falter et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140117812 | Hajati | May 2014 | A1 |
20140176332 | Alameh et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140208853 | Onishi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219521 | Schmitt et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140232241 | Hajati | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140265721 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140355387 | Kitchens et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150036065 | Yousefpor et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049590 | Rowe et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150087991 | Chen et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150097468 | Hajati et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150145374 | Xu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164473 | Kim et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150165479 | Lasiter et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169136 | Ganti et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150189136 | Chung et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198699 | Kuo et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150206738 | Rastegar | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213180 | Herberholz | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150220767 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150261261 | Bhagavatula et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150286312 | Kang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150345987 | Hajati | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160051225 | Kim et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160063294 | Du et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160086010 | Merrell et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092716 | Yazdandoost et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160100822 | Kim et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160107194 | Panchawagh et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160180142 | Riddle et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160326477 | Fernandez-Alcon | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170330552 | Garlepp et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170075700 | Abudi et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170100091 | Eigil et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170110504 | Panchawagh et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170119343 | Pintoffl | May 2017 | A1 |
20170168543 | Dai et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170185821 | Chen et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170219536 | Koch et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170231534 | Agassy et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170293791 | Mainguet et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170316243 | Ghavanini | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322290 | Ng | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322291 | Salvia et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322292 | Salvia et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322305 | Apte et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170323133 | Tsai | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170326590 | Daneman | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170326591 | Apte et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170326593 | Garlepp et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170328866 | Apte et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170328870 | Garlepp et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170330012 | Salvia et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170330553 | Garlepp et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170357839 | Yazdandoost et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180206820 | Anand et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180349663 | Garlepp et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180357457 | Rasmussen et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180369866 | Sammoura et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190005300 | Garlepp et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190102046 | Miranto et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20200030850 | Apte et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1214909 | Jun 2002 | EP |
2884301 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2011040467 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2009096576 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009137106 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2014035564 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2015009635 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015112453 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015120132 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015131083 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015183945 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016007250 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016011172 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016040333 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2017003848 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017192895 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017196678 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017196682 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017192903 | Dec 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Tang, et al., “Pulse-Echo Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor on a Chip”, IEEE Transducers, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, Jun. 21-25, 2015, pp. 674-677. |
Dausch, et al., “Theory and Operation of 2-D Array Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasound Transducers”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, and Frequency Control, vol. 55, No. 11;, Nov. 2008, 2484-2492. |
Hopcroft, et al., “Temperature Compensation of a MEMS Resonator Using Quality Factor as a Thermometer”, Retrieved from Internet: http://micromachine.stanford.edu/˜amanu/linked/MAH_MEMS2006.pdf, 2006, 222-225. |
Hopcroft, et al., “Using the temperature dependence of resonator quality factor as a thermometer”, Applied Physics Letters 91. Retrieved from Internet: http://micromachine.stanford.edu/˜hopcroft/Publications/Hopcroft_QT_ApplPhysLett_91_013505.pdf, 2007, 013505-1-031505-3. |
Lee, et al., “Low jitter and temperature stable MEMS oscillators”, Frequency Control Symposium (FCS), 2012 IEEE International, May 2012, 1-5. |
Li, et al., “Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer for ultra-low pressure measurement: Theoretical study”, AIP Advances 5.12. Retrieved from Internet: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/adva/5/12/10.1063/1.4939217, 2015, 127231. |
Qiu, et al., “Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer (PMUT) Arrays for Integrated Sensing, Actuation and Imaging”, Sensors 15, doi:10.3390/s150408020, Apr. 3, 2015, 8020-8041. |
Savoia, et al., “Design and Fabrication of a cMUT Probe for Ultrasound Imaging of Fingerprints”, 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, Oct. 2010, 1877-1880. |
Shen, et al., “Anisotropic Complementary Acoustic Metamaterial for Canceling out Aberrating Layers”, American Physical Society, Physical Review X 4.4: 041033., Nov. 19, 2014, 041033-1-041033-7. |
Thakar, et al., “Multi-resonator approach to eliminating the temperature dependence of silicon-based timing references”, Hilton Head'14. Retrieved from the Internet: http://blog.narotama.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Multi-resonator-approach-to-eliminating-the-temperature-dependance-of-silicon-based-timing-references.pdf, 2014, 415-418. |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031120, 12 pages, dated Aug. 29, 2017 (Aug. 29, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031120, 13 pages, dated Sep. 1, 2017 (Sep. 1, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031134, 12 pages, dated Aug. 30, 2017 (Aug. 30, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031421 13 pages, dated Jun. 21, 2017 (Jun. 21, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031426 13 pages, dated Jun. 22, 2017 (Jun. 22, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031431, 14 pages, dated Aug. 1, 2017 (Aug. 1, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031434, 13 pages, dated Jun. 26, 2017 (Jun. 26, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031439, 10 pages, dated Jun. 20, 2017 (Jun. 20, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031824, 18 pages, dated Sep. 22, 2017 (Sep. 22, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031827, 16 pages, dated Aug. 1, 2017 (Aug. 1, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031831, 12 pages, dated Jul. 21, 2017 (Jul. 21, 2017). |
ISA/EP, Partial International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031140, 13 pages, dated Aug. 29, 2017 (Aug. 29, 2017). |
Rozen, et al., “Air-Coupled Aluminum Nitride Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers at 0.3 MHZ to 0.9 MHZ”, 2015 28th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), IEEE, Jan. 18, 2015, 921-924. |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031140, 18 pages, dated Nov. 2, 2017 (Nov. 2, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031826, 16 pages, dated Feb. 27, 2018 (Feb. 27, 2018). |
ISA/EP, Partial International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2017/031823, 12 pages, Nov. 30, 2017 (Nov. 30, 2017). |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application # PCT/US2018/063431, pp. 1-15, dated Feb. 5, 2019. |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application # PCT/US2019/015020, pp. 1-23, dated Jul. 1, 2019. |
ISA/EP, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application # PCT/US2019/023440, pp. 1-10, dated Jun. 4, 2019. |
“Moving Average Filters”, Waybackmachine XP05547422, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20170809081353/https//www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/dsp-book/dsp_book_Ch15.pdf—[retrieved on Jan. 24, 2019], Aug. 9, 2017, 1-8. |
“Receiver Thermal Noise Threshold”, Fisher Telecommunication Services, Satellite Communications. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20171027075705/http//www.fishercom.xyz:80/satellite-communications/receiver-thermal-noise-threshold.html, Oct. 27, 2017, 3. |
“Sleep Mode”, Wikipedia, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20170908153323/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_mode [retrieved on Jan. 25, 2019], Sep. 8, 2017, 1-3. |
“TMS320C5515 Fingerprint Development Kit (FDK) Hardware Guide”, Texas Instruments, Literature No. SPRUFX3, XP055547651, Apr. 2010, 1-26. |
“ZTE V7 MAX. 5,5” smartphone on MediaTeck Helio P10 cpu; Published on Apr. 20, 2016; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncNCbpkGQzU (Year: 2016). |
Cappelli, et al., “Fingerprint Image Reconstruction from Standard Templates”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Computer Society, vol. 29, No. 9, Sep. 2007, 1489-1503. |
Feng, et al., “Fingerprint Reconstruction: From Minutiae to Phase”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Computer Society, vol. 33, No. 2, Feb. 2011, 209-223. |
Kumar, et al., “Towards Contactless, Low-Cost and Accurate 3D Fingerprint Identification”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Computer Society, vol. 37, No. 3, Mar. 2015, 681-696. |
Pang, et al., “Extracting Valley-Ridge Lines from Point-Cloud-Based 3D Fingerprint Models”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE Service Center, New York, vol. 33, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2013, 73-81. |
Ross, et al., “From Template to Image: Reconstructing Fingerprints from Minutiae Points”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Computer Society, vol. 29, No. 4, Apr. 2007, 544-560. |
Zhou, et al., “Partial Fingerprint Reconstruction with Improved Smooth Extension”, Network and System Security, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Jun. 3, 2013, 756-762. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170326594 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62334408 | May 2016 | US |