Ultrasound case builder system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11627944
  • Patent Number
    11,627,944
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 28, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 18, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A system for creating customized learning content for ultrasound simulators using materials from an existing library of curated content including images, volumetric data sets, and metadata, or otherwise acquired, overcoming numerous challenges to ultrasound education and training, including the ability to seamlessly create real-patient based ultrasound training curriculum, the creation of an expansive library that that represents multiple pathologic conditions, and the dissemination of training content to multiple users in an asynchronous manner.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The ability to export medical data from an ultrasound machine to a computer system has recently aided the emergence of a new generation of sophisticated raining simulators, which are routinely used by wide audiences of medical learners. These simulators can thereby deliver compelling experiences where users can interact directly with real patient data and learn how to diagnose life-threatening pathologies within the confines of a training center or even the comfort of one's home. The realism of these new simulation technologies has led to a sharp improvement in the quality and effectiveness of today's training solutions. At the current state of the art, however, the case libraries of medical data that feed into the simulators are acquired and curated by a select number of experts working directly with the developers of such training solutions. One improvement of the present invention, therefore, involves a new service-oriented architecture that allows a wider audience of interested parties to author, customize, and share training content with a community of learners.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram showing selection of data sets to build a case using one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the input of meta data using another embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing the generation of ultrasound data sets using one embodiment of the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of presently-preferred embodiments of the invention and is not intended to represent the only forms in which the present invention may be constructed and/or utilized. The description sets forth the functions and the sequence of steps for constructing and operating the invention in connection with the illustrated embodiments. It is to be understood, however, that the same or equivalent functions and sequences may be accomplished by different embodiments that are also intended to be encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention.


The process starts with a library of ultrasound data. For the purpose of simulation, ultrasound data should be stored in a 3D or 4D volumetric format, which most modern ultrasound machines are able to acquire. The user may acquire his or her own data sets if he/she has access to the required equipment, or rely on a library of data curated by other parties. If the user wishes to use his/her own data sets, then the service will provide all the tools and guidance required to:

    • Acquire the data effectively;
    • Export the data from the ultrasound machine to an exchangeable format;
    • Import the data into the proposed system; and
    • Annotate the data with additional information (metadata) to help in finding and authoring the training material in the system.


The collection of volumetric data described thus far shall be referred to in the present application as the volume library. At minimum each item in the volume library, must indicate the location on the body where the volume was acquired and possibly some additional information about the condition of the patient. This is basic information that a medical professional needs in order to understand and interpret an ultrasound case correctly.


The system presents the volume library to the user with a compelling Graphical User Interface (GUI) and a set of visual tools to help in navigating, finding, and selecting a desired subset of volumes. Items in the volume library may be presented to the user by individual representative snapshots, reference sections of the volumetric data, interactive 2D, 3D or 4D visualizations, or a video illustrating the relevant features of the data with optional narration by a curator.


The user proceeds by selecting a collection of volumes that are deemed relevant for a particular teaching purpose, and imports them into a virtual patient, who exemplifies a particular condition or medical scenario. The user can then annotate the condition with a case history that describes various details of the patient including:

    • The gender, age, and other physical characteristics of the patient;
    • The condition of the patient during the scanning session;
    • Values of blood pressure, heart rate, and other relevant clinical readings; and
    • The presence of pain and other identifiable symptoms.


The user may choose to honor the actual condition of the patient, whose anatomy has been captured by the data set, or attribute an imaginary but plausible set of conditions to the virtual patient that are consistent with the pedagogic purpose of the simulation scenario.


A collection of customized virtual patients will constitute a case library designed by the user to fulfill a particular curriculum of his/her choosing.


The customized case library will be made available to the simulation environment, allowing learners to acquire hands-on experience interacting with the virtual patients in a manner that mimics closely how a medical practitioner would act in the presence of a real patient.


The present invention provides numerous benefits to medical professionals and instructors including:

    • The ability to tailor simulation scenarios to the teaching curriculum of medical centers or other types of medical institutions;
    • The creation of a large library of cases allowing medical practitioners to acquire hands-on experience with specific and rare types of pathologies;
    • The dissemination of simulated content to a wide range of learners over disparate geographical regions; and
    • The creation of a community of world experts contributing their knowledge and expertise to improve the quantity and quality of the medical content available to training simulators.


      Acquiring and Exporting Custom Data


If the user has access to the appropriate ultrasound equipment, he/she will have the ability to export custom content into the proposed system. The advanced training simulators described in this document require volumetric data sets, which are also the subject of the preferred embodiment, but one skilled in the art can envision a similarly constructed system loaded with 2D images or videos, or entirely different data sets acquired with different imaging tools, such as CT or MRI. Modern ultrasound machine are capable of capturing 3D or 4D data sets with minimal effort. Special ultrasound probes can acquire a dense set of 2D slices at small incremental displacements using an automated internal mechanism. The collection of 2D slices is then processed and registered into a three-dimensional array of data. Alternatively, some systems use an array of piezoelectric transducers to collect a three-dimensional volume with a single scan. More advanced machines used for scanning dynamic organs such as the heart of lungs, can acquire a temporal sequence of 3D volumes, often referred as 4D volumes. Recent progress on the latter allows the acquisition of high quality 4D data sets over multiple cycles of a dynamic organ (e.g. the heart) by reorganizing the acquired data in space and time using a process called Spatio-Temporal Image Correlation (STIC). Recent advances in transducer technology have also explored the use of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (CMUT) elements in place of traditional piezoelectric components, yielding imaging, devices with higher resolution and faster response times.


In some cases, it is possible to arrange a collection of 2D scans into 3D volumetric data sets. The latter may impose additional requirements on how the data is acquired, and may require the presence of supplemental motion sensing equipment, but it has the advantage of relying on lower-end ultrasound machines that are found in more disadvantaged parts of the world.


The system will optionally provide visual guides and training materials to help the user acquire the data in the most efficient and effective manner for the purpose of importing the data into a training simulator. These include:

    • A protocol for preparing the machine and the patient for the acquisition session;
    • How to maneuver the probe to collect the data;
    • Which buttons to press to save the image in the required format; and
    • What information to preserve on a log book to inform the simulation environment during later stages of customization.


Since many ultrasound machines differ in features and workflows, it may be useful to supplement the afore-mentioned guides with material tailored specifically to selected brands and models of ultrasound machines.


For the purpose of this invention, the user needs the ability to export medical data from the clinical device into a format that can be exported into a computer system provisioned with local or remote storage capabilities.


Most ultrasound machines are able to export data on storage media or directly through a wired or wireless connection. Common storage media include:

    • CD-ROM;
    • DVD-ROM;
    • Flash memory drives;
    • External USB hard drives; and
    • SD cards.


Modem ultrasound machines often provide the ability to transfer data sets directly to a remote computer using a TCP/IP connection or other network protocol.


Lacking a direct way of exporting data from an ultrasound machine, the present invention can also take advantage of techniques known to those skilled in the art for reconstructing volumetric data sets by assembling frames directly from the video output of the ultrasound machine.


Alternatively, manufacturers could integrate the proposed system into the console and dashboard of the ultrasound machine allowing users to export data directly into the remote system described in this invention.


The proposed system must be able to read and import data in a format that is compatible with training simulators.


Most ultrasound machines are capable of exporting data in the standardized DICOM exchange format, which is preferred for the proposed application. Alternatively lacking support for the DICOM format, some machines may provide other means for exporting data in proprietary formats. To address the latter, implementers may provide special add-ins that allows the system to load and convert such proprietary formats into a known internal format.


Removing Patient Information


HIPAA regulations in the United States, and similar regulations in other countries protect the privacy of patients and prohibit the dissemination of medical information that includes distinct marks or labels that clearly identify their source. For this reason, and to comply with regulations, the proposed system must provide a set of tools and instructions to help the user strip identifying information from the data sets before the upload process, referred to herein as deidentification. Since the process of deidentification may not be fully automated in certain circumstances, the service provider may decide to recruit a committee of reviewers to inspect the data for compliance before approving it for inclusion in the system.


Security


Since the proposed system is designed to host sensitive data, implementers must ensure that the storage solution and all communication channels conform to strict standards of security, access control, and encryption.


User Management


The system needs a mechanism to identify each user or a representative of an interested medical group. The authentication mechanism may rely on the type of username/password credentials widely used by internet services, or may use more sophisticated and secure mechanisms based on two-factor authentication and biometrics. The purpose of this user management system is to associate data sets and custom case libraries with a specific user and to protect their privacy and authorship.


Annotations and Upload


Once the data has been acquired and prepared to be included in the system, the user will log into the system using a designated authentication mechanism and be presented with a friendly portal to upload the data sets, sometimes referred to herein as volume libraries, into a central storage location. Depending on the requirements of the user and service provider, the data sets may be uploaded into a storage node attached to a specific local server, or may be uploaded into a distributed system in the cloud. The portal should also provide custom forms and editing capabilities to annotate the data sets with additional information required by later stages of customization. For instance important annotations that should be included are:

    • The location on the body where the scan was acquired;
    • The type of patient;
    • The condition of the patient during the scan;
    • The type of ultrasound probe that was used for the acquisition;
    • The symptoms affecting the patient during the scan;
    • A brief medical history of the patient if available;
    • Key vitals measured during the scanning process;
    • Additional pictures or videos acquired during the scanning process;
    • The pathology imaged in the scan; and
    • Search keywords that can help finding the particular scan.


The user may choose to make the uploaded data sets available only to himself/herself, to the general public, or prescribed subsets of other users.


In some cases the user may be unable to upload the data directly into the system through an internet connection or other direct means of data exchange. In such cases, the user may elect to send storage media directly via traditional mail and provide the necessary annotations and information about the user on designated paper forms.


Data Alignment with the Virtual Body


To aid in the correct interpretation of an ultrasound scan, it is very important to know the location on the body where the image was acquired and the orientation of the probe during the scan. As a reflection of this fact, most ultrasound simulators align volumetric data with a rendered 3D body on screen, the virtual body. With this alignment metadata, the training simulator can simultaneously showcase medical data along with the corresponding position and orientation of the probe with respect to the virtual body in the rendered environment.


Unfortunately, most ultrasound machines do not provide the necessary sensor hardware to measure the position and the orientation of the probe with respect of the body automatically during the scan. To complicate the problem, the virtual bodies included in 10 ultrasound simulators also do not match the exact body habitus of the patient, thus a perfect alignment of the medical data with the virtual body is not attainable. Hence, the alignment process must be performed manually and with good judgment to ensure that the expected mismatch between the geometry of the virtual body and the anatomy in the medical data does not mislead the learner.


Given an acquired volume, the proposed system may provide a set of visual tools to

    • Select a virtual body appropriate for the medical data;
    • Set the position of the volume in 3D space with respect to the virtual body;
    • Set the orientation of the volume in 3D space with respect to the virtual body; inspect the alignment of the medical data with the geometry of the virtual body;
    • Alter or deform the geometry of the virtual body to match the medical data more accurately; and
    • Use additional co-registered data sets, such as CT or MRI scans to aid in the alignment process.


The alignment tools may take advantage of traditional means of input such as mouse and keyboard, rely on trackballs and 3D mice, or use more sophisticated 3-DOF or 6-DOF motion sensing solutions. The process may be further aided by providing the user with more accurate stereopsis and perception of depth using stereoscopic displays or virtual reality headsets.


Given the difficulty of this process the user may choose to forgo the alignment of medical data at the expense of a less immersive simulation experience. Alternatively, the service provider may recruit a team of professionals to perform the alignment for a fee, or allow a crowd-sourced community of volunteers to contribute to the alignment process.


Assigning Data Sets to Virtual Patients


With the volume library populated with medical data, the user proceeds by selecting a subset of volumes and assigning them to a virtual patient. The purpose of this process is to fill an empty virtual body with medical data consistent with a healthy model, a desired pathology, or other medical condition.


The selection process is aided by a rich set of visual tools and an easy-to-use Graphical User interface. The user interface should allow the user to:

    • View the library of medical data;
    • Interact with specific medical data sets to explore the anatomy captured in them;
    • View annotations related to each data set;
    • View the location of the data sets on the virtual body;
    • Search for specific data sets that match certain keywords or medical criteria;
    • Find data sets based on characteristics of the patient such as gender, age, height, and weight; and
    • Assign the selected data sets to the virtual patient.


Each virtual patient populated with medical data constitutes a medical case. A collection of virtual patients forms a case library.


Authoring Custom Medical Scenarios


For the purpose of training, the system allows the user to embellish each virtual patient additional information describing the condition of the patient, the symptoms, the cause of ailment (e.g. car accident, heart attack, drug overdose), and other details that help provide context for the medical case. The user interface will provide appropriate editing capabilities to accomplish the latter. These may include a variety of computer metaphors used in GUIs, such as:

    • Edit boxes;
    • Combo boxes;
    • Radio buttons; and
    • Drag-and-drop from a list of existing data.


This additional information is referred to in this application as a case history.


Furthermore, an instructor may prescribe the course of action that is required to diagnose, and treat the patient appropriately by defining a set of available actions and defining the outcome of each. The combination of a populated virtual patient, the case history, and the set of available actions is sometimes referred to herein as a scenario.


In many cases, separate volumetric data sets cannot be integrated in a single virtual patient with plausible outcomes. For instance, it would not make sense to create a virtual patient that contains imaging data for both ovaries and a prostate. While it is generally assumed that a medical learner or practitioner using the system possesses enough knowledge to avoid combining incompatible data sets in a single virtual patient, the system could be greatly enhanced by including a rule engine or other form of fuzzy logic or AI that checks and verifies the degree of compatibility of different data sets and guides the user in only selecting content that results in plausible medical cases. For instance, the system may exclude organs specific to male subjects, if the user has specifically chosen to author a pregnancy case. Expert systems of this kind have been implemented and deployed in other domains, and it is therefore reasonable to expect an individual skilled in the art to have the ability to implement the latter without further guidance.


An alternative embodiment involves integrating the scenario into a larger physical mannequin. The end user would scan through the imported data sets and work through the scenario using a physical mannequin as the scanning surface, rather than a virtual patient.


Using the Case Library in Training Simulators


In designing the system care must be taken to define the case library and scenarios in a way that is compatible with at least one leading training simulator. The proposed system will have the ability to make the entire custom case library authored by the user available in the training simulator. The training simulator in turn is expected to provide the following capabilities to the user:

    • View the available case library and select a desired case;
    • Show the virtual body matching the selected case;
    • Position the medical probe on a desired location on the virtual body;
    • Scan the virtual body in the simulated environment and view the associated medical data;
    • View the case history for the virtual patient; and
    • Perform actions according to the scenario prescribed by the author of the medical case.


In an alternative embodiment, the case authoring functionality may be embedded directly within a training simulator. In this case the training simulator operates in two distinct modes:

  • (1) Case authoring mode. Allows the user create custom content possibly leveraging the existing case library provided by the simulator
  • (2) Simulation mode. Allows the user browse the available sets of medical content, which can include curated content by the vendor, curated content professionally made by third panics, custom content created by the user, and optionally custom content made by other users. Once selected, the user can interact with the medical content using the features provided by the training simulator.


A typical workflow for a learner using the training simulator may proceed as follows:

  • (1) Log into the training simulator with the appropriate credentials provided by the system administrator;
  • (2) Once logged in, the training simulator will show a portion of the case library consistent with the access rights set in the system for the current user;
  • (3) Navigate the case library to find a case matching the intent of the learner;
  • (4) Select the desired case, and start reading the provided case history;
  • (5) Establish a strategy for diagnosing the patient;
  • (6) Position the virtual probe on the correct location of the virtual body in the simulated environment;
  • (7) Scan the virtual patient and try to formulate a diagnosis based on the evidence presented in the medical data;
  • (8) Move the virtual probe to a different location on the virtual body to gather more evidence about the possible ailment of the patient;
  • (9) Once satisfied with the study, proceed by selecting one of the available actions prescribed by the scenario to treat the patient; and
  • (10) Get a report as to whether or not the treatment provided has helped the patient survive the ailment.


It is understood that the proposed workflow is just an illustration of the basic user experience in the preferred embodiment. One may construct a system consistent with the spirit of this invention by skipping, reordering, or adding more steps to the proposed workflow.


Deployment and Architecture


The proposed system may be implemented most naturally with a server-oriented architecture consisting of a server and multiple clients. The server has the following responsibilities:

    • Manage user accounts;
    • Store the case libraries for all users;
    • Provide the ability to upload data into the system;
    • Provide a centralized interface for clients to author their custom case library;
    • Provide a dashboard for users to manage their content and access rights;
    • Provide visual guidance and instruction material to help users interact with the system;
    • Provide a back-end for training simulators to load and use custom case libraries in the simulated environment;
    • Provide additional tools for the conversion, deidentification, and annotation of medical data; and
    • Provide additional tools to manage the licensing and distribution of content.


The server functionality may be located on single physical server restricted to a local network, on a data center managed by a single vendor, or on a geographically distributed cloud.


The clients can be any computing devices with an internet connection or a physical connection to a designated local server. The client will connect to the server and have the ability to:

    • Log-in into the server;
    • Upload data into the server;
    • Access the dashboard for his/her user account;
    • Access training material describing how to use the system;
    • Access the user interface for viewing, selecting, and authoring the custom case library; and
    • Managing licenses and the distribution of content.


In the preferred embodiment the server delivers the content and interactive capabilities with established web technologies. Alternatively, all the client functionality will be provided by a specialized desktop or mobile application than can connect and exchange data with the server remotely. In the preferred embodiment the means of communication between the client and server is provided by the established internet infrastructure and protocols such as TCP/IP, but the implemented may decide to use proprietary solutions to achieve better security, efficiency, and control over the system.


In some environments and institutions, especially in high-security facilities with strict security policies, a client-server architecture is not feasible. If needed, the entire system described in this invention can be implemented on a single designated machine storing all the required content, software, and simulation functionality. Alternatively, the same client-server architecture can be deployed on a designated server restricted to a local network.


While the present invention has been described with regards to particular embodiments, including focusing on the use of volumetric data sets of ultrasound data, the same invention can be carried out with volumetric data sets originating from other imaging technologies such as CT or MRI, and it is further recognized that additional variations on the concepts of the present invention may be devised without departing from the inventive concept.

Claims
  • 1. A computer-based ultrasound simulation system, comprising: a) a plurality of simulation cases derived from real-patient volumetric data sets from different patients, each simulation case comprising information regarding case histories and realistic sets of available actions;b) a graphical user interface configured to display a virtual body, the virtual body comprising a plurality of predetermined discrete anatomical regions displayed on the virtual body;c) a volume library stored on a server, the volume library comprising the volumetric data sets from the different patients for assigning to the plurality of discrete anatomical regions displayed on the virtual body to create the plurality of simulation cases; andd) a processor configured to select the plurality of predetermined discrete anatomical regions, select the volumetric data sets from the volume library, and assign one of the volumetric data sets to one of the discrete anatomical regions, whereina first volumetric data set is assigned to a first predetermined discrete anatomical region in the virtual body and a second volumetric data set is assigned to a second predetermined discrete anatomical region in the virtual body, wherein the first volumetric data set is from a different patient than the second volumetric data set, and wherein the first volumetric data set is discontinuous from the second volumetric data set.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first and second volumetric data sets are acquired from an imaging technology, the first and second volumetric data sets selected from the group consisting of 3D volumetric data and 4D volumetric data, wherein each of the first and second volumetric data set occupies a volume in the virtual body from different patients.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the processor is configured to further display alignment tools on the graphical user interface for aligning each of the first and second volumetric data sets within the virtual body.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the processor is configured to further display an item representing one of the first or second volumetric data sets for assignment to the predetermined discrete anatomical region on the virtual body, wherein the item is selected from the group consisting of a representative snapshot, sections of the volumetric data, interactive visualizations, and a video clip.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the video clip comprises an audio track to store a narration of the volumetric data sets.
  • 6. The system of claim 2, wherein the imaging technology is an ultrasound machine.
  • 7. The system of claim 2, wherein the first and second volumetric data sets are annotated with case histories.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, further comprising an ultrasound training simulator to run an ultrasound simulation based on the plurality of simulation cases uploaded to the system.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, further comprising a case authoring mode for adding medical data into the volume library, and a simulation mode for simulating an ultrasound based on the plurality of simulation cases, wherein the case authoring mode is configured to edit the information of the plurality of simulation cases.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, further comprising visual tools configured to allow for selection of the virtual body and alter a geometry of the virtual body.
  • 11. A computer-based ultrasound simulation system, comprising: a) a plurality of simulation cases derived from real-patient volumetric data sets, each simulation case comprising information regarding case histories and realistic sets of available actions;b) a graphical user interface displaying a virtual body, the virtual body comprising a plurality of predetermined discrete anatomical regions displayed on the virtual body;c) a volume library stored on a server, the volume library comprising the volumetric data sets for assigning to the plurality of predetermined discrete anatomical regions to create the plurality of simulation cases;d) alignment tools displayed on the graphical user interface for aligning each volumetric data sets within the virtual body, wherein the graphical user interface displays an item representing one of the volumetric data sets, the item selected from the group consisting of a representative snapshot, sections of the volumetric data, interactive visualizations, and a video clip for selecting the one of the volumetric data sets, wherein the video clip comprises an audio track to store a narration of the volumetric data sets, volumetric data sets are annotated with case histories;e) an ultrasound training simulator to run an ultrasound simulation based on the plurality of simulation cases uploaded to the system;f) a case authoring mode for adding medical data into the volume library, and a simulation mode for simulating an ultrasound based on the plurality of simulation cases, wherein the case authoring mode is configured to edit the information of the plurality of simulation cases;g) visual tools configured to allow for selection of the virtual body and alter a geometry of the virtual body; andh) a rule engine configured to check compatibility of each volumetric data for the virtual body selected to maintain anatomically plausible medical cases,i) wherein a processor is configured to display the volume library, select a first discrete anatomical region from the plurality of predetermined discrete anatomical regions displayed on the virtual body, select a first volumetric data set from the volume library, assign the first volumetric data set to the first discrete anatomical region, wherein an appearance of the first discrete anatomical region changes when assigned the first volumetric data set, select a second discrete anatomical region, select a second volumetric data from the volume library, and assign the second volumetric data set to the second discrete anatomical region, wherein the first volumetric data set and the second volumetric data set are acquired from different patients, and wherein the first volumetric data set is discontinuous from the second volumetric data set.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/234,585, filed on Sep. 29, 2015. This patent application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/481,725, filed May 25, 2012, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/243,758 filed Sep. 23, 2011 for Multimodal Ultrasound Training System, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,480,404, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/720,515 filed May 30, 2007 for Multimodal Medical Procedure Training System, now abandoned, which is the national stage entry of PCT/US05/43155, entitled “Multimodal Medical Procedure Training System” and filed Nov. 30, 2005, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/631,488, entitled Multimodal Emergency Medical Procedural Training Platform and filed Nov. 30, 2004. Parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/481,725, filed May 25, 2012, also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/491,126 filed May 27, 2011 for Data Acquisition, Reconstruction, and Simulation; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/491,131 filed May 27, 2011 for Data Validator; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/491,134 filed May 27, 2011 for Peripheral Probe with Six Degrees of Freedom Plus 1; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/491,135 filed May 27, 2011 for Patient-Specific Advanced Ultrasound Image Reconstruction Algorithms; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/491,138 filed May 27, 2011 for System and Method for Improving Acquired Ultrasound-Image Review. Applicant incorporates into the present application all disclosures of each of the foregoing patent applications by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (257)
Number Name Date Kind
1488233 Frederick Mar 1924 A
1762937 Stand Jun 1930 A
2019121 De Rewal Oct 1935 A
2112019 Gyger Mar 1938 A
2127610 Moore Aug 1938 A
2705049 Brooks Mar 1955 A
2705307 Edson Mar 1955 A
2722947 Sragal Nov 1955 A
2886316 Ayala May 1959 A
4040171 Cline et al. Aug 1977 A
4838863 Allard et al. Jun 1989 A
4838869 Allard Jun 1989 A
4994034 Botich et al. Feb 1991 A
5231381 Duwaer Jul 1993 A
5513992 Refait May 1996 A
5609485 Bergman Mar 1997 A
5678565 Sarvazyan Oct 1997 A
5689443 Ramanathan Nov 1997 A
5701900 Shehada et al. Dec 1997 A
5704791 Giiiio Jan 1998 A
5755577 Gillio May 1998 A
5767839 Rosenberg Jun 1998 A
5776062 Nields Jul 1998 A
5791908 Gillio Aug 1998 A
5800177 Gillio Sep 1998 A
5800178 Gillio Sep 1998 A
5800179 Bailey Sep 1998 A
5800350 Coppieson et al. Sep 1998 A
5827942 Madsen et al. Oct 1998 A
5882206 Gillio Mar 1999 A
5889237 Makinwa Mar 1999 A
5934288 Avila et al. Aug 1999 A
6001472 Ikeda et al. Dec 1999 A
6048312 Ishrak et al. Apr 2000 A
6063030 Vara et al. May 2000 A
6068597 Lin May 2000 A
6074213 Hon Jun 2000 A
6113395 Hon Sep 2000 A
6117078 Lysyansky Sep 2000 A
6122538 Sliwa, Jr. et al. Sep 2000 A
6156213 Dudley et al. Dec 2000 A
6193657 Drapkin Feb 2001 B1
6267599 Bailey Jul 2001 B1
6468212 Scott et al. Oct 2002 B1
6502756 Fåhraeus Jan 2003 B1
6511427 Sliwa, Jr. et al. Jan 2003 B1
6548768 Pettersson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570104 Ericson et al. May 2003 B1
6654000 Rosenberg Nov 2003 B2
6663008 Pettersson et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665554 Charles et al. Dec 2003 B1
6666376 Ericson Dec 2003 B1
6667695 Pettersson et al. Dec 2003 B2
6674427 Pettersson et al. Jan 2004 B1
6689966 Wiebe Feb 2004 B2
6693626 Rosenberg Feb 2004 B1
6694163 Vining Feb 2004 B1
6698660 Fåhraeus et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714213 Lithicum et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714901 Cotin et al. Mar 2004 B1
6719470 Berhin Apr 2004 B2
6722574 Skantze et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732927 Olsson et al. May 2004 B2
6750877 Rosenberg et al. Jun 2004 B2
6780016 Toly Aug 2004 B1
6816148 Mallett et al. Nov 2004 B2
6836555 Ericson et al. Dec 2004 B2
6854821 Ericson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6864880 Hugosson et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878062 Bjorklund et al. Apr 2005 B2
6896650 Tracey et al. May 2005 B2
6916283 Tracey et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927916 Craven-Bartle Aug 2005 B2
6929183 Pettersson Aug 2005 B2
6929481 Alexander et al. Aug 2005 B1
6947033 Fåhraeus et al. Sep 2005 B2
6958747 Sahlberg et al. Oct 2005 B2
6966495 Lynggaard et al. Nov 2005 B2
6992655 Ericson et al. Jan 2006 B2
7002559 Ericson Feb 2006 B2
7035429 Andreasson Apr 2006 B2
7037258 Chatenever et al. May 2006 B2
7050653 Edso et al. May 2006 B2
7054487 Ericson et al. May 2006 B2
7072529 Hugosson et al. Jul 2006 B2
7089308 Fransson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094977 Ericson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7110604 Olsson Sep 2006 B2
7120320 Petterson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7121465 Rignell Oct 2006 B2
7127682 Sandstrom et al. Oct 2006 B2
7143952 Ericson Dec 2006 B2
7145556 Pettersson Dec 2006 B2
7154056 Bergqvist et al. Dec 2006 B2
7162087 Bryborn Jan 2007 B2
7167164 Ericson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7172131 Pettersson et al. Feb 2007 B2
7175095 Pettersson et al. Feb 2007 B2
7176896 Fahraeus et al. Feb 2007 B1
7180509 Fermgard et al. Feb 2007 B2
7195166 Olsson et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202861 Lynggaard Apr 2007 B2
7202963 Wiebe et al. Apr 2007 B2
7239306 Fahraeus et al. Jul 2007 B2
7246321 Bryborn et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248250 Pettersson et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249256 Hansen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249716 Bryborn Jul 2007 B2
7254839 Fahraeus et al. Aug 2007 B2
7263710 Hummel, Jr. Aug 2007 B1
7278017 Skantze Oct 2007 B2
7281668 Pettersson et al. Oct 2007 B2
7283676 Olsson Oct 2007 B2
7293697 Wiebe et al. Nov 2007 B2
7295193 Fahraeus Nov 2007 B2
7296075 Lynggaard Nov 2007 B2
7321692 Bryborn et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333947 Wiebe et al. Feb 2008 B2
7345673 Ericson et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353393 Hansen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7356012 Wiebe et al. Apr 2008 B2
7371068 Lloyd et al. May 2008 B2
7382361 Burstrom et al. Jun 2008 B2
7385595 Bryborn et al. Jun 2008 B2
7408536 Hugosson et al. Aug 2008 B2
7415501 Burstrom Aug 2008 B2
7418160 Lynggaard Aug 2008 B2
7422154 Ericson Sep 2008 B2
7441183 Burstrom et al. Oct 2008 B2
7457413 Thuvesholmen et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457476 Olsson Nov 2008 B2
7543753 Pettersson Jun 2009 B2
7588191 Pettersson et al. Sep 2009 B2
7600693 Pettersson Oct 2009 B2
7649637 Wiebe et al. Jan 2010 B2
7670070 Craven-Bartle Mar 2010 B2
7672513 Bjorklund et al. Mar 2010 B2
7701446 Sahlberg et al. Apr 2010 B2
7710408 Ericson May 2010 B2
7751089 Fahraeus et al. Jul 2010 B2
7753283 Lynggaard Jul 2010 B2
7777777 Bowman et al. Aug 2010 B2
7788315 Johansson Aug 2010 B2
7794388 Draxinger et al. Sep 2010 B2
7806696 Alexander et al. Oct 2010 B2
7833018 Alexander et al. Nov 2010 B2
7850454 Toly Dec 2010 B2
7857626 Toly Dec 2010 B2
7871850 Park Jan 2011 B2
7931470 Alexander et al. Apr 2011 B2
8244506 Butsev et al. Aug 2012 B2
8294972 Chung Oct 2012 B2
8428326 Falk et al. Apr 2013 B2
8480404 Savitsky Jul 2013 B2
8480406 Alexander et al. Jul 2013 B2
8556635 Toly Oct 2013 B2
8721344 Marmaropoulos et al. May 2014 B2
9128116 Welch et al. Sep 2015 B2
9251721 Lampotang Feb 2016 B2
9436993 Stolka et al. Sep 2016 B1
9870721 Savitsky et al. Jan 2018 B2
9911365 Siassi Mar 2018 B2
10052010 Feddema Aug 2018 B2
10132015 Woodruff et al. Nov 2018 B2
11011077 Garcia Kilroy May 2021 B2
20010031920 Kaufman et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020076581 McCoy Jun 2002 A1
20020076681 Leight et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020088926 Prasser Jul 2002 A1
20020099310 Kimchy et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020168618 Anderson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173721 Grunwald et al. Nov 2002 A1
20040043368 Hsieh et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040087850 Okerlund et al. May 2004 A1
20050119569 Ohtake Jun 2005 A1
20050181342 Toly Aug 2005 A1
20050214726 Feygin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228617 Kerwin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050283075 Ma et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060020204 Serra et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060098010 Dwyer et al. May 2006 A1
20070088213 Poland Apr 2007 A1
20070161904 Urbano Jul 2007 A1
20070232907 Pelissier et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070236514 Augusanto Oct 2007 A1
20070238085 Colvin Oct 2007 A1
20080009743 Hayasaka Jan 2008 A1
20080137071 Chow Jun 2008 A1
20080187896 Savitsky Aug 2008 A1
20080200807 Wright et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080204004 Anderson Aug 2008 A1
20080269606 Matsumura Oct 2008 A1
20080294096 Uber et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080312884 Hostettler et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090006419 Savitsky Jan 2009 A1
20090043195 Poland Feb 2009 A1
20090046912 Hostettler Feb 2009 A1
20090130642 Tada et al. May 2009 A1
20090209859 Tsujita et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090266957 Cermak Oct 2009 A1
20090305213 Burgkart et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311655 Karkanias et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100055657 Goble Mar 2010 A1
20100104162 Falk et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100179428 Pedersen Jul 2010 A1
20100268067 Razzaque et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100277422 Muresianu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110010023 Kunzig et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110306025 Sheehan et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120021993 Kim et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120058457 Savitsky Mar 2012 A1
20120143142 Klein Jun 2012 A1
20120150797 Landy Jun 2012 A1
20120179039 Pelissier et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120200977 Nestler Aug 2012 A1
20120219937 Hughes et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120237102 Savitsky et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120237913 Savitsky Sep 2012 A1
20120238875 Savitsky et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120251991 Savitsky et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130046523 Van Dinther Feb 2013 A1
20130064036 Lee et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130065211 Amso et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130137989 Chen May 2013 A1
20130158411 Miyasaka Jun 2013 A1
20130179306 Want et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130236872 Laurusonis et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140087347 Tracy Mar 2014 A1
20140114194 Kanayama et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140119645 Zimet May 2014 A1
20140120505 Rios et al. May 2014 A1
20140170620 Savitsky et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140228685 Eelbode Aug 2014 A1
20140272878 Shim et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150056591 Tepper et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150078639 Hausotte Mar 2015 A1
20150084897 Nataneli et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150086956 Savitsky et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150140538 Savitsky et al. May 2015 A1
20150154890 Savitsky et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150213731 Sato Jul 2015 A1
20160314716 Grubbs Oct 2016 A1
20160328998 Pedersen et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170028141 Fiedler et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170035517 Geri Feb 2017 A1
20170046985 Hendrickson et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170110032 O'Brien Apr 2017 A1
20170270829 Bauss Sep 2017 A1
20180197441 Rios Jul 2018 A1
20180366034 Casals Gelpi Dec 2018 A1
20190057620 Eggert Feb 2019 A1
20190231436 Panse Aug 2019 A1
20190321657 Hale Oct 2019 A1
20200126449 Horst Apr 2020 A1
20200138518 Lang May 2020 A1
20210128125 Sitti et al. May 2021 A1
20210186311 Levy et al. Jun 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
1103223 May 2001 EP
2801966 Nov 2014 EP
2127610 Mar 1999 RU
1994040171 Nov 2014 RU
2006060406 Jun 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)
Entry
Chung, Gregory, “Effects of Simulation-Based Practice on Focused Assessment . . . ”, Military Medicine, Oct. 2013, vol. 178.
Aligned Management Associates, Inc., Corporate home page describing organizing committee, overview, Procedicus MIST[trademark]-suturing module 30.0, 6 pgs., obtained from website Sep. 6, 2004.
American Academy of Emergency Medicine, conference: 11th annual scientific assembly preconference ultrasound courts, http://www. aaem.org/education/scientificassembly/sa05/precon/ultrasound.shtml, 6 pgs, obtained from website Feb. 16, 2005.
Barbosa, J. et al., “Computer education in emergency medicine residency programs,” http://www.med-ed-online.org/res00002.htm, 8 pgs, obtained from website Sep. 6, 2004.
Brannam, Let al, “Emergency nurses utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients,” Acad Emerg Med, 11(12):1361-1363, Dec. 2004.
Calvert, N. et al., “The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound locating devices for central venous access: a systematic review and economic evaiuation/executive summary,” Health Tech Assess 2003, 7(12), 4 pgs.
Center for Human Simulation, corporate home page describing overview/people, http://www.uchsc.edu, 7 pgs, obtained from website Sep. 6, 2004.
CIMIT News, “The medical access program: new CIMIT initiative to benefit underserved patients/partners telemedicine and CIMIT launch new initiative: stay connected, be healthy/highlights: operating room of the future plug-and-play project,” http://www.cimit.org, Jan. 2005; vol. II(2), 2 pgs., obtained from website Mar. 1, 2005.
Colt, H. G. et al., “Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation: a revolution in procedural training,” Chest 2001; 120:1333-1339.
Computer Motion, “About computer motion: technology to enhance surgeons capabilities, improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs/corporate alliances/products solutions for surgical innovation/training on the da Vinci[registered] surgical system-introduction,” 2002 Computer Motion, http://www.computermotion.com, 6 pgs.
Delp, Setai, “Surgical simulation—an emerging technology for training in emergency medicine,” Presence, 6 (2):147-159, Apr. 1997 (abstract).
Dorner, R. et. al., “Synergies between interactive training simulations and digital storytelling: a component-based framework,” Computer Graphics, 26(1):45-55, Feb. 2002 (abstract).
Duque, D. and Kessler S., “Ultrasound guided vascular access,” Amer Coli Emerg Phy., http://www.nyacep.org/education/articles/ultrasound%20vascular%20access.htm, 2 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005.
Espinet, A. and Dunning J., “Does ultrasound-guided central line insertion reduce complications and time to placement in elective patients undergoing cardiac surgery,” Inter Cardiovascular Thoracic Surg, 3:523-527, 2004; http:/licvts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/3/3/523, 6 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005 (abstract).
Gallagher, A. G. et al., “Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterization laboratory,” Lancet, 364:1538-1540, Oct. 23, 2004.
Gallagher, A. G. et al., “Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures,” AM Coli Surg, 197(3):479-488, Sep. 2003.
Gausche, M. et al., “Effect on out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal Intubation on survival and neurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial,” JAMA, 283(6)783-790, Feb. 9, 2000.
Gore, D. C. and Gregory, S. R., “Historical perspective on medical errors: Richard Cabot and the Institute of Medicine,” J Amer Coli Surg, 197(4), 5 pgs, Oct. 2003.
Grantcharov, T. P. et al., “Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training,” Br J Surg, 91(2):146-150, Feb. 1, 2004 (abstract).
Grantcharov, T. P. et al., “Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills,” Am J Surg, 185(2):146-149, Feb. 1, 2004 (abstract).
Haluck, R. S., et al., “Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality A survey of program directors in general surgery,” Arch Surg, 135(7):786-792, Jul. 1, 2000.
Helmreich, R. L., “On error management: lessons from aviation,” BMJ, 320:781-785, Mar. 2000.
Huckman, R. S. and Pisano, G. P., “Turf battles in coronary revascularization,” N Engl J Med, http://www.nejm.org, 4 pgs. 352(9):857-859, Mar. 3, 2005.
Immersion Corporation, URL: http://www.immersion.com/corporate/products/, corporate home page describing Immersions surgical training simulators—“Wireless Data Glove: The CyberGlove[registered]II System,” 5 pgs, obtained from the website Nov. 17, 2005 and Jan. 24, 2008.
injuryboard.com, “Reducing complications associated with central vein catheterization,” URSL: http://www.injuryboard.com/view.cfm/Article=668, 5 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005.
INTERSENSE, home page listing motion tracking products, http://www.isense.com/prodcuts.aspxid=42,1 pg, obtained from website Jan. 24, 2008.
Jemmett, M. E., et. al., “Unrecognized misplacement of endotracheal tubes in a mixed urban to rural emergency medical services setting,” Acad Emerg Med, 10(9):961-964, Sep. 2003.
Katz, S. H. and Falk, J. L., “Misplaced endotrachial tubes by paramedics in an urban medical services system,” Annals Emerg Med, 37:32-37, Jan. 2001.
Lewis, R., “Educational research: time to reach the bar, not lower it,” Acad Emerg Med, 12(3):247-248, Mar. 2005.
Liu, A. et, al., “A survey of surgical simulation: applications, technology, and education,” Presence, 12(6):1-45, Dec. 2003.
Manchester Visulations Centre, “Webset project-bringing 3D medical training tools to the WWW,” http://www.sve.man.ac.uklmvc/research/previous/website, 3 pgs, obtained from the website Sep. 8, 2004.
Mclellan, H., “Virtual realities,” Mclellan Wyatt Digital, 33 pgs.
Medical Simulation Corporation, corporate home page describing management team/frequently asked questions, http://www.medsimulation.com/about_msc/key_employees.asp, 7 pgs, obtained from website Nov. 25, 2004.
Medtronic, “The StealthStation[registered] treatment guidance system,” the corporate home page describing the company fact sheet and profile; http://www.medtronic.com/Newsroom, 4 pgs, obtained from website Mar. 5, 2005.
Mort, T. C., “Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts,” Anesth Analg, 99(2):607-613, Aug. 2004, 1 pg, obtained from website Sep. 8, 2004 (abstract).
Nazeer, S. R., et al., “Ultrasound-assisted paracentesis performed by emergency physicians v.s. the traditional technique: a prospective, randomized study,” Amer J of Emer Med, 23:363-367, 2005.
NCA Medical Simulation Center, Tutorial-simulation for medical training, http://Simcen.usuhs.millmiccaie, 4 pgs, 2003.
Next Dimension Imaging, “Products-Anatomy Analyzer 2,” http://www.nexted.com/anatomyanalyzer.asp, 2 pgs, obtained from website Dec. 7, 2004.
Norris, T. E. et al., “Teaching procedural skills,” J General Internal Med. 12(S2):S64-S70, Apr. 1997.
On the Net Resources-Education and Training, URL: http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge_base/education.html, corporate home page regarding internet sites regarding education and training, 16 pgs, obtained from website Jan, 8, 2005.
Osberg, K. M., “Virtual reality and education: a look at both sides of the sword,” http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-93-7/, 19 pgs, Dec. 14, 1992, obtained from website Jan. 21, 2008.
Osmon, S. et al., “Clinical investigations: reporting of medical errors: an intensive care unit experience,” Grit Care Med. 32(3), 13 pgs, Mar. 2004.
Ponder, M., et al., “Immersive VR decision training: telling Interactive stories featuring advanced human simulation technologies,” Eurographics Association 2003, 10 pgs.
Primal, corporate home page describing resources for teaching healthcare practitioners, 2 pgs, obtained from website.
Prystowsky, J. B. et al., “A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement,” Am J Surg 1999; 177 (2):171-175 (abstract).
Reachin, “Medical Training Development Centre/Reachin technologies AB has entered into a corporation with Mentice AB,” Jan. 20, 2004, 4 pgs, obtained from website Nov. 9, 2004.
Rothschild, J. M., “Ultrasound guidance of central vein catheterization,” NCBI, Nat Lib Med, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/, HSTAT 21, 6 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005.
Rowe, R. and Cohen, R. A., “An evaluation of a virtual reality airway simulator,” Anesth Analg 2002, 95:62-66.
Sensable Technologies, “PHANTOM Omni Haptic Device,” 2 pgs, http://www.sensable.com/haptic-ohantom-omni.htm., obtained from website Jan. 24, 2008.
Shaffer, K., “Becoming a physician: teaching anatomy in a digital age,” NEJM, Sep. 23, 2004; 351(13):1279-81 (extract of first 100 words—no abstract).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170018204 A1 Jan 2017 US
Provisional Applications (6)
Number Date Country
62234585 Sep 2015 US
61491126 May 2011 US
61491135 May 2011 US
61491131 May 2011 US
61491138 May 2011 US
60631488 Nov 2004 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11720515 US
Child 13481725 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13481725 May 2012 US
Child 15279405 US
Parent 13243758 Sep 2011 US
Child 13481725 US