The present invention relates to an ultrasound imaging method of extracting a flow signal from echographic signals received from a region of interest comprising moving tissues and flowing fluids. The present invention also concerns an ultrasound imaging system which is operated to use such a method.
The present invention finds in particular its application in the domain of medical ultrasound imaging where the moving tissues are typically arterial or cardiac walls and the flowing fluids are blood flows.
When transmitting a beam of ultrasound signals to a region of interest of the human body comprising moving tissues and/or flowing fluids, echographic signals are received, which comprise both a clutter component and a flow component. Prior art techniques have been developed for removing the clutter component and extracting some characteristics of the flow component.
In the international patent application published under number IB2003/004899, an ultrasound imaging system is disclosed, which comprises:
In accordance with the prior art, the separation means comprise submeans for calculating an auto-correlation function of temporally uncorrelated and spatially correlated Doppler clutter and flow components, submeans for calculating a spatial correlation diagonal matrix from said autocorrelation function and submeans for separating the temporally uncorrelated Doppler components corresponding to the Doppler clutter and flow components from said diagonal matrix.
A Principal Component Analysis is performed, which provides two orthogonal signals. This analysis is based on the assumption that the Doppler clutter and flow components can be modelized by harmonic signals with two distinct frequencies. A problem is that when a limited number of transmissions is performed, the obtained Doppler clutter and flow components have a large spectrum comprising more than one frequency, which do overlap. Therefore, the Principal Component Analysis does not lead to a reliable separation of the Doppler clutter and flow components.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a solution for reliably separating the Doppler clutter and flow components of the Doppler signals calculated within a limited number of time samples.
This is achieved by an ultrasound imaging method, comprising the steps of:
With the invention a PCA analysis is firstly performed, the two first eigen vectors providing an orthonormal basis comprising first and second Doppler signals. Then, a temporal autocorrelation function is calculated for all possible linear combinations of said first and second Doppler signals as a temporal coherence function and the combinations which maximize this temporal coherence function are isolated. This temporal coherence function is not normalised in the same way as the autocorrelation function of the prior art and make the coherence maximization criteria effective. The temporal coherence is expected to be maximal with a value close or equal to 1 for a single signal and to decrease for a mixture of signals. Usually, two local maxima are found, which confirm the hypothesis that two components are forming the initial Doppler signals, but it may happen that only one maximum is found, which means that no flow component is present in the signals. The first and second maxima form a non necessarily orthonormal basis, from which third and fourth estimated Doppler signals can be derived. A further step of classification is intended to associate each of the first and second maxima with the corresponding Doppler components among the Doppler flow and clutter components.
Therefore, the method in accordance with the invention is based on a maximization of the time coherence of the Doppler clutter and flow components of the calculated Doppler signals. Consequently, with the invention, a more reliable extraction of the Doppler and flow components is provided.
An advantage of the method in accordance with the invention is that only three time samples are needed for calculating the temporal coherence.
These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from and will be elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter.
The present invention will now be described in more detail, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The invention relates to an ultrasound imaging method of extracting a flow component from echographic signals received from a region of interest comprising moving tissues and flowing fluids and of forming a motion image of said flow component. In the following, the particular domain of medical ultrasound imaging is considered and the moving tissues and flowing fluids are typically arterial or cardiac walls and blood flows. In this domain both the acquisition of 3D echographic data sets and the imaging of the blood flows offer a real added value for early diagnosis of arterial or cardiac diseases.
Referring to
One or two maxima of the coherence map computed from the linear combinations of the two basis Doppler function are determined and the corresponding one or two Doppler signals ZM1 and ZM2 are generated. They constitute a non necessarily orthonormal basis of the Doppler signals X, from which third and fourth estimated Doppler signals X3 and X4 of the Doppler clutter and flow components can be derived by a step 50. A classification step 60 is intended to classify said third and fourth estimated Doppler signals X3 and X4 into an estimated Doppler clutter and flow components using classification criteria. A step 70 is intended to form and display a motion image representing the flowing fluids from said estimated Doppler flow component.
Advantageously, the step 30 of separating the Doppler signals X into an orthonormal basis of a first Doppler signal Z1 and a second Doppler signal Z2 consists in a Principal Component Analysis of the Doppler signals X, which is well-known to those skilled in the art.
The Doppler signals X can be expressed as a linear combination of a matrix of Doppler flow components and a matrix of Doppler clutter components in the following way:
X(P,T)=AF(P)SF(T)+ACl(P)SCl(T), where X(P,T) is a function of time and space, the Doppler flow and clutter components are only function of time and their amplification factors AF and ACl, are only function of space.
With matrices such an equation becomes: X=A.S, where X is a matrix of (n, EL) elements, n being a space position number and EL the number of time samples, A a matrix of (n, 2) elements and S a matrix of (2, EL) elements. The object of the separation step 30 is therefore to find out an estimation Z of the matrix S, such that Z=WX where W is a matrix equal to A−1. This is for instance achieved as described in the prior art document published under number IB2003/004899 by diagonalizing a spatial correlation matrix of the Doppler signals X(P, T). This permits of computing a spatial correlation diagonal matrix allowing the separation of the temporally uncorrelated Doppler components corresponding to flow signals and clutter signals. Such a spatial correlation diagonal matrix comprises a number EL of eigen vectors, from which a number of EL estimated Doppler signals can be derived. The two first eigen vectors are kept as a first estimated Doppler signal Z1 and a second estimated Doppler signal Z2, which form an orthonormal basis for forming all possible linear combinations of both estimated Doppler signals. The estimated Doppler signals Z1 and Z2 can be expressed as a matrix Z such that Z=W1X.
Starting from said orthonormal basis the object of the step 40 is to search among all possible linear combinations of the estimated Doppler signals Z1 and Z2 for the ones which locally maximize a temporal coherence function. As a matter of fact, a linear combination corresponding to only one of the temporally uncorrelated Doppler components of the Doppler signals should have a temporal coherence equal or at least close to one, because it is not temporally mixed with another Doppler signal.
A linear combination of the estimated Doppler signals Z1 and Z2 can be expressed as follows: Z=cos Z1+sin
ejφZ2, where θ and φ are parameters which allow to cover all the possible solutions. θ is expected to vary between 0 and π/2 and φ between −π and π.
An amplitude of the temporal coherence is calculated in the following way:
where EL is greater than or equal to 3.
Referring to
The first maximum represents the linear combination S1=cos 1Z1+sin
1ejφ
2Z1+sin
2ejφ
A matrix W2 is obtained, such that the searched Doppler flow and clutter components
verify the equation: S=W2Z and W2 can be expressed as:
Advantageously a separation measure SM is calculated in the following way:
SM=det(W2). Such a separation measure SM indicates how much both maxima ZM1 and ZM2 are different from each other and therefore provides a reliability measure about the result obtained.
An optimized estimation of the matrix S can be derived from step 40. The matrix S, corresponding to the two Doppler components, can be expressed as follows: S=W2Z=W2W1X=WX with W=W2W1. The amplitude matrix A is therefore obtained by inverting the matrix W: A=W−1.
Consequently, a third and fourth estimated Doppler signals X3 and X4 are obtained, which can be expressed as:
A problem is that we do not know which estimated Doppler signal X3, X4 corresponds to the Doppler flow and clutter components S1, S2 respectively.
Consequently, the classification step 60 is intended to classify said estimated Doppler signal into the Doppler flow and clutter components using classification criteria.
In an embodiment of the invention shown in
An example of classification is provided when the region of interest is a carotid. In this case, the Doppler clutter component may be weak and only one maximum is found. The checking substep calculates the difference X−X3 between the Doppler signals X and the single maximum X3. The amplitude is used for checking if the the difference Doppler signal is not only due to noise, but cannot be chosen as a classification criterion, because in this case the Doppler clutter component is not expected to have an amplitude greater than the one of the Doppler flow component. Preferably, in that case, the classification criterion of velocity is used. As a validation, the decoherence D of the generated Doppler signal X is calculated. Such a validation measure should validate the fact that there are two Doppler components in the Doppler signal X.
The present invention also concerns a medical ultrasound imaging system shown in
A number of maxima, usually a first and a second maxima ZM1 and ZM2, are obtained.
The signal processor 140 further comprises submeans 143 for deriving a third and a fourth estimated Doppler signals X3 and X4 from said first and second maxima and submeans 144 for classifying said Doppler signals X3 and X4 into an estimated Doppler clutter EDC and an estimated Doppler flow EDF components using classification criteria. The system further comprises an image processing module 150, which is operated to form a 2D or 3D structural image from the received echographic signals RS and a motion image MI of the flowing fluid from the estimated Doppler flow component EDF provided by the signal processor 140. The images generated by the image processing module are displayed on an image display 160. The modules of the system of
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be capable of designing many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed in parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claims. The word “comprising” and “comprises”, and the like, does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those listed in any claim or the specification as a whole. The singular reference of an element does not exclude the plural reference of such elements and vice-versa. The invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In a device claim enumerating several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04300669.1 | Oct 2004 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB05/53285 | 10/6/2005 | WO | 3/30/2007 |