1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an apparatus utilizing ultrasonic vibrations forcing the movement of pumping members or protrusions to spray fluid from an internal chamber of the device.
2. Background of the Related Art
Numerous ultrasonic devices exist for the purpose of delivering atomized liquids to high pressure environments, such as internal combustion engines. For example, ultrasonic fuel injectors containing internal chambers have been developed and disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,469,974, to Speranza, U.S. Pat. No. 4,995,367, to Yamauchi et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,025,766, to Yamauchi et al. These devices atomize liquids upon expulsion from the tip of the device. The tip is ultrasonically vibrated and upon collision with the fluid, drives atomization by breaking down the liquid into small droplets.
The present invention relates to an apparatus utilizing ultrasonic vibrations to force the movement of protrusions to spray fluids. The apparatus comprises a horn with an internal chamber possessing a front wall, a back wall, and at least one side wall. Within the internal chamber of the horn are protrusions extending from a wall of the chamber. The horn includes a radiation surface at its distal end. Fluids to be expelled from the horn enter the internal chamber of the horn through at least one channel passing through a wall of the horn and leading into the chamber. After passing through the horn's internal chamber, the fluids exit the horn by passing through a channel originating in the front wall of the chamber and ending at the radiation surface. A transducer may be connected to the horn's proximal end to generate ultrasonic vibrations throughout the length of the horn.
Typical pressure-driven fluid atomizers function in the following way: As the fluid to be atomized passes through a constriction, the net pressure pushing the fluid through the constriction is converted to kinetic energy. As a result of the conversion, the velocity of the fluid increases, while the pressure of the fluid decreases. The increase in kinetic energy breaks the attractive forces between the molecules of the fluid, resulting in atomization of the fluid. However, concerning traditional atomizers, fluid atomization is hindered by high-pressure environments. This is because the high pressure in the environment pushes the fluid back into the spraying apparatus. The difference between the internal pressure pushing the fluid forward and out of the spraying apparatus and the environmental pressure pushing the fluid back into the spraying apparatus is called the net pressure. Net pressure is converted to kinetic energy. If there is an increase in environmental pressure, the net pressure decreases, resulting in decreased kinetic energy. In turn, the decrease in kinetic energy decreases atomization. The present invention offers a possible resolution to this industry-wide problem by coupling ultrasonic energy to a spraying apparatus to atomize and/or expel fluids out into environments of high pressure.
The present invention couples ultrasonic vibrations to a series of pumping members or protrusions to produce a spraying apparatus. As the transducer transmits ultrasonic vibrations throughout the horn, the horn is activated. The ultrasonic vibrations traveling through the horn cause segments of the horn to expand and contract. The segments of the horn corresponding with regions between nodes (points of minimum deflection or amplitude) on the ultrasonic vibrations expand and contract. Furthermore, segments of the horn corresponding with points of anti-nodes on the ultrasonic vibrations exhibit the greatest amount of movement, as anti-nodes are points of maximum deflection or amplitude. Conversely, segments of the horn corresponding exactly with nodes on ultrasonic vibrations do not expand or contract.
As segments of the horn are expanding and contracting, the protrusions which extend from those segments of the chamber's walls, also contract and expand. This causes a pumping motion as the front-facing edges of the protrusions move forward, increasing the fluid pressure and driving the fluids forward. Therefore, by increasing the pressure pushing the fluids out, the kinetic energy of the fluids increases, thereby enabling the device to overcome environmental pressure working to push the fluid back in.
To efficiently and effectively push fluids forward through the chamber and out the radiation surface, the rear-facing edges of the protrusions should be more streamlined than their front-facing edges. This configuration enables the net movement of the fluids (fluid pushing forward minus fluid pushing backwards) in the forward direction.
It is preferred to orient the front-facing edges of the protrusions approximately perpendicular to the central axis of the horn. A front-facing edge that is approximately perpendicular to the central axis acts more like a wall pushing the fluid forward when the protrusion expands. When the protrusion contracts, the rear-facing edges, which are not approximately perpendicular to the central axis, may be more streamlined and, therefore, may not effectively push the fluids backwards.
It is also preferred to locate the front-facing edges of the protrusions on anti-nodes of the ultrasonic vibrations passing through the horn. So locating the front-facing edges enables the pumping action produced by vibrating the horn to be controlled by the frequency of the vibrations. For example, if the frequency of the ultrasonic vibrations were cut in half, then some of the front-facing edges would fall on nodes (points of no movement) of the ultrasonic vibrations. This would prevent those protrusions from pumping fluids and overall, reduce the pumping action of the horn. Therefore, the pumping mechanism may be controlled by adjusting the frequency of the ultrasonic vibrations passing through the horn.
An important aspect of the spraying apparatus involves the relationship between the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibrations passing through the horn and the pumping behavior of the protrusions. Increasing the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibrations passing through the horn increases the degree of deflection the ultrasonic vibrations create. Therefore, the higher the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibrations passing through the horn the farther forward the protrusions will move. Consequently, increasing the amplitude will increase the amount of pumping produced by the protrusions. Increased pumping by the protrusions increases the pressure generated by the protrusion' motion. If the horn is vibrated in resonance by a piezoelectric transducer driven by an electrical signal supplied by a generator, then the amplitude of the vibrations passing through the horn can be increased by increasing the voltage of the electrical signal driving the transducer.
Increasing the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibrations increases the amount of kinetic energy imparted on fluids as they exit the horn at the radiation surface. As discussed above, increased amplitude causes increased deflection of the ultrasonic vibrations. The increased deflection causes increased pumping of the protrusions, resulting in an increase in pressure of the fluids being pumped through the spraying apparatus. The increased pressure causes increased kinetic energy which is imparted on the fluids movement out of the chamber. Therefore, the atomization occurring as the fluid exits at the radiation surface may be manipulated by adjusting the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibrations.
The protrusions may be discrete elements such as, but not limited to, discrete bands encircling the internal chamber of the ultrasound tip. The protrusions may also spiral down the chamber similar to the threading in a nut. However, the protrusions need not encircle the entire circumference of the chamber.
Protrusions may take the form of various shapes such as, but not limited to, convex, spherical, triangular, polygonal, teeth-like, and/or any combination thereof so long as enough of the protrusions contain a front-facing edge less streamlined than their corresponding rear-facing edge, as to generate a net forward movement of the fluid passing through the internal chamber of the horn. Depending upon the chosen conformation of the protrusions, the front-facing edges of the protrusions may not need to be orientated approximately perpendicular to the central axis of the horn. Likewise, depending upon the conformation chosen, it may be possible to orient the rear-facing edges of the protrusions approximately perpendicular to the central axis of the horn.
It is preferable to position the back and front walls of the chamber on nodes of the ultrasonic vibrations. Positioning the back and front walls on nodes minimizes the amount of ultrasonic vibrations emanating into the chamber from the back wall and the amount of ultrasonic vibrations reflecting back into the chamber off the front wall. This is significant because the ultrasonic vibrations reflecting off the front wall push the fluids back into the chamber. However, this is only a suggested preference since the walls of the chamber may be positioned on any point along the ultrasound vibrations.
The front wall of the chamber may contain slanted portions. A front wall with slanted portions serves to funnel fluids to be atomized and/or expelled into the channel leading to the radiation surface. This results in a more efficient system of delivering fluid to the radiation surface for expulsion.
As already discussed, the ultrasound horn may serve to atomize liquids. Atomization is a process by which bulk liquids are converted to a collection of drops such as a mist and/or spray. The present invention couples kinetic energy to drive atomization. If the channel running from the chamber to the radiation surface is narrower than the width of the chamber, the fluid's velocity increases as it passes from the chamber into the channel with a simultaneous decrease in pressure. As explained above, an increase in velocity is proportional to an increase in kinetic energy. The kinetic energy drives atomization as it breaks the attractive forces between molecules in the fluid.
As the fluid exits the horn at the radiation surface, it may be atomized by the ultrasonic vibrations emanating from the radiation surface. The ultrasonic vibrations traveling through the horn cause the radiation surface to move forward. The radiation surface's movement causes a collision with the fluid exiting the horn and the surrounding air. This collision causes the radiation surface to release vibrations into the exiting fluid. As such, the kinetic energy of the exiting fluid increases. The increased kinetic energy enhances atomization of the fluid exiting at the radiation surface, thereby counteracting a decrease in atomization caused by changing environmental conditions. If the fluid is atomized by its passage through the horn, the ultrasonic vibrations emanating from the radiation surface may serve to further atomize the fluid as it is expelled at the radiation surface, by breaking the already internally-atomized fluid into even smaller droplets.
Adjusting the amplitude of the ultrasonic waves traveling down the length of the horn may also be useful in focusing the atomized spray produced at the radiation surface. Creating a focused spray may be accomplished by utilizing the ultrasonic vibrations emanating from the radiation surface to confine and direct the spray pattern. Ultrasonic vibrations emanating from the radiation surface may direct and confine the vast majority of the atomized spray produced within the outer boundaries of the radiation surface. The level of confinement obtained by the ultrasonic vibrations emanating from the radiation surface depends upon the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibrations traveling down the horn. As such, increasing the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibrations passing through the horn may narrow the width of the spray pattern produced, thereby focusing the spray. For instance, if the spray is fanning too wide, increasing the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibrations may narrow the spray pattern. Conversely, if the spray is too narrow, then decreasing the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibrations may widen the spray pattern.
As the atomized fluid is expelled from the radiation surface, the spray produced may be altered depending on the geometric conformation of the radiation surface. A radiation surface with a planar face produces a roughly column-like spray pattern. A tapered radiation surface generates a narrower spray pattern as compared to the width of the horn. A concave radiation surface focuses the spray whereas a convex radiation surface produces a spray wider than the width of the horn. Furthermore, the radiation surface may contain slanted portions, resulting in an inward spray directed towards the central axis of the horn. Any combination of the above mentioned configurations may be used such as, but not limited to, an outer concave portion encircling an inner convex portion and/or an outer planer portion encompassing an inner conical portion. Inducing the horn to vibration in resonance may facilitate the production of the spray patterns described above, but may not be necessary.
It should be noted and appreciated that other features and advantages, in addition to those listed, may be elicited by devices in accordance with the present invention. The mechanisms of operation presented herein are strictly theoretical and are not meant in any way to limit the scope this disclosure and/or the accompanying claims.
The present invention will be shown and described with reference to the drawings of preferred embodiments and clearly understood in details.
Preferred embodiments of the ultrasonic spraying apparatus are illustrated throughout the figures and described in detail below. Those skilled in the art will understand the advantages provided by the ultrasonic spraying apparatus upon review.
Ultrasound horn 101 comprises a proximal surface 117, a radiation surface 111 opposite proximal surface 117, and at least one radial surface 118 extending between proximal surface 117 and radiation surface 111. Within horn 101 has an internal chamber 103 containing a back wall 104, a front wall 105, and at least one side wall 113 extending between back wall 104 and front wall 105. The back wall 104 and front wall 105 of internal chamber 103 lie approximately on nodes 106 of ultrasonic vibrations 114. This positioning of back wall 104 and front wall 105 reduces the amount of ultrasonic vibrations 114 within chamber 103. So positioning back wall 104 reduces its movement and collisions with the fluid within chamber 103, because nodes 106 are points on ultrasonic vibrations 114 of minimum deflection or amplitude. Similarly, positioning front wall 105 on a node reduces the echoing of ultrasonic vibrations off front wall 105. Although the preferred positions of front wall 105 and back wall 104 are approximately on nodes 106 of ultrasonic vibrations 114, front wall 105 and/or back wall 104 may be positioned at any point along ultrasonic vibrations 114, including anti-nodes 107.
Protrusions 119 extend from back wall 104 and continue along side walls 113. Protrusions 119 comprise front-facing edges 122 and rear-facing edges 123 more streamlined than their front-facing edges. Front-facing edges 122 of protrusions 119 are approximately perpendicular to central axis 120 of horn 101 and lie approximately on anti-nodes 107 of ultrasonic vibrations 114. Although it is preferable that at least one point on front-facing edges 122 lie approximately on an anti-node, the front-facing edges may be positioned at any point along ultrasonic vibrations 114. Furthermore, not all of the front-facing edges 122 need be located on corresponding points of ultrasonic vibrations 114.
The fluid to be atomized and/or expelled may enter internal chamber 103 through at least one channel 109 originating in radial surface 118. Channel 109 may lie approximately on a node 106 of ultrasonic vibrations 114. After entering chamber 103 through channel 109, the fluid exits chamber 103 through channel 110, originating in the front wall 105 of chamber 103 and ending at the radiation surface 111.
If fluid passing through horn 101 is to be atomized by the kinetic energy gained from its passage through channel 110, then the maximum height (h) of chamber 103 should be larger than maximum width (w) of channel 110. Preferably, the maximum height of chamber 103 should be approximately 200 times larger than the maximum width of channel 110 or greater.
FIG. IB illustrates an alternative embodiment of the ultrasonic spraying apparatus, viewed from the distal end of horn 101 and looking back towards the proximal end of horn 101, much like looking down a barrel of a gun. Channels 109 are located on the same platan but alternatively or in combination, channels may be located on different platans. Alternative embodiments of an ultrasound horn 101 in accordance with the present invention may possess a single channel 109 opening within side wall 113 of chamber 103. If multiple channels 109 are utilized, they may be aligned along the central axis 120 of horn 101, as depicted in
Alternatively or in combination, the fluid to be atomized may enter chamber 103 through a channel 121 originating in proximal surface 117 and opening within back wall 104, as depicted in
It is preferable if at least one point on radiation surface 111 lies approximately on an anti-node of the ultrasonic vibrations 114 passing through horn 101.
Ultrasound horn 101 may further comprise cap 112 attached to its distal end. Cap 112 may be mechanically attached (for example, secured with a threaded connector), adhesively attached, and/or welded to the distal end of horn 101. Other means of attaching cap 112 to horn 101, readily recognizable to persons of ordinary skill in the art, may be used in combination with or in the alternative to the previously enumerated means. Comprising front wall 105, channel 110, and radiation surface 111, a removable cap 112 permits the level of fluid atomization and/or the spray pattern produced to be adjusted depending on need and/or circumstances. For instance, the width of channel 110 may need to be adjusted to produce the desired level of atomization with different fluids. The geometrical configuration of the radiation surface may also need to be changed to create the appropriate spray pattern for different applications. Attaching cap 112 to the spraying apparatus approximately on a node 106 of ultrasonic vibrations 114 passing through horn 101 may help prevent the separation of cap 112 from horn 101 during operation.
It is important to note that fluids of different temperatures may be delivered into chamber 103 as to improve the atomization of the fluid exiting channel 110. This may also change the spray volume, the quality of the spray, and/or expedite the drying process of the fluid sprayed.
Positioning back wall 104 such that at least one point on lens 501 lies approximately on an anti-node of the ultrasonic vibrations 114 passing through horn 101 may maximize the increased pumping action produced by lens 501. Preferably, the center of lens 501 lies approximately on an anti-node of the ultrasonic vibrations 114. It may also be desirable for slanted portion 201 of front wall 105 to form an angle equal to or greater than the angle of convergence of the ultrasonic vibrations emitted from the peripheral boundaries of ultrasonic lens 501.
Ultrasonic vibrations emanating from radiation surface 111 spray the fluid ejected at radiation surface 111. The manner in which ultrasonic vibrations emanating from the radiation surface direct the spray of fluids ejected from channel 110 depends largely upon the conformation of radiation surface 111.
The ultrasonic vibrations emitted from the convex portion 403 of the radiation surface 111 depicted in
The horn may be capable of vibrating in resonance at a frequency of approximately 16 kHz or greater. The ultrasonic vibrations traveling down the horn may have an amplitude of approximately 1 micron or greater. It is preferred that the horn be capable of vibrating in resonance at a frequency between approximately 20 kHz and approximately 200 kHz. It is recommended that the horn be capable of vibrating in resonance at a frequency of approximately 30 kHz.
The signal driving the ultrasound transducer may be a sinusoidal wave, square wave, triangular wave, trapezoidal wave, or any combination thereof.
It should be appreciated that elements described with singular articles such as “a”, “an”, and/or “the” and/or otherwise described singularly may be used in plurality. It should also be appreciated that elements described in plurality may be used singularly.
Although specific embodiments of apparatuses and methods have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement, combination, and/or sequence that is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative and not restrictive. Combinations of the above embodiments and other embodiments as well as combinations and sequences of the above methods and other methods of use will be apparent to individuals possessing skill in the art upon review of the present disclosure.
The scope of the claimed apparatus and methods should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3523906 | Vrancken et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3561444 | Boucher | Feb 1971 | A |
3663288 | Miller | May 1972 | A |
3779792 | Stoy et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3861852 | Berger | Jan 1975 | A |
3924335 | Balamuth et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3970250 | Drews | Jul 1976 | A |
4047957 | De Winter et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4100309 | Micklus et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4119094 | Micklus et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4153201 | Berger et al. | May 1979 | A |
4168447 | Bussiere et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4169984 | Parisi | Oct 1979 | A |
4263188 | Hampton et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4271705 | Crostack | Jun 1981 | A |
4301093 | Eck | Nov 1981 | A |
4301968 | Berger et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4306998 | Wenzel et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4309989 | Fahim | Jan 1982 | A |
4319155 | Nakai et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4373009 | Winn | Feb 1983 | A |
4387024 | Kurihara et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4389330 | Tice et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4391797 | Folkman et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4402458 | Lierke et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4459317 | Lambert | Jul 1984 | A |
4469974 | Speranza | Sep 1984 | A |
4474326 | Takahashi | Oct 1984 | A |
4483571 | Mishiro | Nov 1984 | A |
4487808 | Lambert | Dec 1984 | A |
4492622 | Kuypers | Jan 1985 | A |
4536179 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4541564 | Berger et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4548844 | Podell et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4582654 | Karnicky et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4596220 | Oosuga et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4642267 | Creasy et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646967 | Geithman | Mar 1987 | A |
4659014 | Soth et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4666437 | Lambert | May 1987 | A |
4675361 | Ward, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4684328 | Murphy | Aug 1987 | A |
4686406 | Meitzler | Aug 1987 | A |
4692352 | Huddleston | Sep 1987 | A |
4705709 | Vailancourt | Nov 1987 | A |
4715353 | Koike et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4721117 | Mar et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4726525 | Yonekawa et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4732322 | Gaysert et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4734092 | Millerd | Mar 1988 | A |
4748986 | Morrison et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4764021 | Eppes | Aug 1988 | A |
4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4770664 | Gogolewski | Sep 1988 | A |
4793339 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4795458 | Regan | Jan 1989 | A |
4796807 | Bendig et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4833014 | Linder et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834124 | Honda | May 1989 | A |
4841976 | Packard et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4850534 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4867173 | Leoni et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4876126 | Takemura et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4877989 | Drews et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4884579 | Engelson | Dec 1989 | A |
4923464 | Di Pisa, Jr. | May 1990 | A |
4925698 | Klausner et al. | May 1990 | A |
4943460 | Markle et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945937 | Scribner | Aug 1990 | A |
4959074 | Halpern et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4964409 | Tremulis | Oct 1990 | A |
4969890 | Sugita et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4980231 | Baker et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4995367 | Yamauchi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002582 | Guire et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5007928 | Okamura et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5008363 | Mallon et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5017383 | Ozawa et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019400 | Gombotz et al. | May 1991 | A |
5025766 | Yamauchi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026607 | Kiezulas | Jun 1991 | A |
5037656 | Pitt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5037677 | Halpern et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5040543 | Badera et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5049403 | Larm et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5057371 | Cantry et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066705 | Wickert | Nov 1991 | A |
5067489 | Lind | Nov 1991 | A |
5069217 | Fleischhacker, Jr. | Dec 1991 | A |
5069226 | Yamauchi et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5076266 | Babaev | Dec 1991 | A |
5079093 | Akashi et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5080683 | Sulc et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5080924 | Kamel et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5084315 | Karimi et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5091205 | Fan | Feb 1992 | A |
5099815 | Yamauchi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100669 | Hyon et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5102401 | Lambert et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5102402 | Dror et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5102417 | Palmaz | Apr 1992 | A |
5105010 | Sundaearaman et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5107852 | Davidson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5128170 | Matsuda et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134993 | Van der Linden et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5147370 | McNamara et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5160790 | Elton | Nov 1992 | A |
5211183 | Wilson | May 1993 | A |
5213111 | Cook et al. | May 1993 | A |
5217026 | Stoy et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5234457 | Andersen | Aug 1993 | A |
5240994 | Brink et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241970 | Johlin, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5243996 | Hall | Sep 1993 | A |
5250613 | Bergstrom et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5266359 | Spielvogel | Nov 1993 | A |
5275173 | Samson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282823 | Schwartz et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5283063 | Freeman | Feb 1994 | A |
5290585 | Elton | Mar 1994 | A |
5304121 | Sahatjian | Apr 1994 | A |
5304140 | Kugo et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5315998 | Tachibana et al. | May 1994 | A |
5326164 | Logan | Jul 1994 | A |
5336534 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344426 | Lau et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5370614 | Amundson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380299 | Fearnot et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389379 | Dirix et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5419760 | Narciso, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5426885 | Williams | Jun 1995 | A |
5443458 | Eury | Aug 1995 | A |
5443496 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447724 | Helmus et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5449372 | Schmaltz et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5449382 | Dayton | Sep 1995 | A |
5464650 | Berg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470829 | Prisell et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476909 | Kim et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5512055 | Domb et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514154 | Lau et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515841 | Robertson et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515842 | Ramseyer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5516043 | Manna et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527337 | Stack et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5529635 | Odell | Jun 1996 | A |
5545208 | Wolff et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548035 | Kim et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551416 | Stimpson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562922 | Lambert | Oct 1996 | A |
5569463 | Helmus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5576072 | Hostettler et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578075 | Dayton | Nov 1996 | A |
5591227 | Dinh et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597292 | Rhee et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5605696 | Eury et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609629 | Fearnot et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616608 | Kinsella et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620738 | Fan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624411 | Tuch | Apr 1997 | A |
5626862 | Brem et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637113 | Tartaglia et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656036 | Palmaz | Aug 1997 | A |
5674192 | Sahatjian et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674241 | Bley et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674242 | Phan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679400 | Tuch | Oct 1997 | A |
5697967 | Dinh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700286 | Tartaglia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702754 | Zhong | Dec 1997 | A |
5709874 | Hanson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712326 | Jones et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716981 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733925 | Kunz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736100 | Miyake et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739237 | Russell et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755769 | Richard et al. | May 1998 | A |
5776184 | Tuch | Jul 1998 | A |
5785972 | Tyler | Jul 1998 | A |
5799732 | Gonzalez et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803106 | Cohen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5837008 | Berg et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5868153 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5902332 | Schatz | May 1999 | A |
5957975 | Lafont et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5972027 | Johnson | Oct 1999 | A |
6041253 | Kost et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053424 | Gipson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077543 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099561 | Alt | Aug 2000 | A |
6099562 | Ding et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099563 | Zhong | Aug 2000 | A |
6102298 | Bush | Aug 2000 | A |
6104952 | Tu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120536 | Ding et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6190315 | Kost et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6231600 | Zhong | May 2001 | B1 |
6234765 | Deak | May 2001 | B1 |
6234990 | Rowe et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244738 | Yasuda et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251099 | Kollias et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258121 | Yang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287285 | Michael et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296630 | Altman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299604 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306166 | Barry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315215 | Gipson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335029 | Kamath et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357671 | Cewers | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369039 | Palasis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6450417 | Gipson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478754 | Babaev | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6560548 | Roudil et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6568052 | Rife et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569099 | Babaev | May 2003 | B1 |
6601581 | Babaev | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6663554 | Babaev | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6706288 | Gustavsson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720710 | Wenzel et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6723064 | Babaev | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730349 | Schwarz | May 2004 | B2 |
6737021 | Watari et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6776352 | Jameson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6811805 | Gilliard et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837445 | Tsai | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6840280 | Simon | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6861088 | Weber et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883729 | Putvinski et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7044163 | Fan et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7060319 | Fredrickson | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077860 | Yan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7178554 | Tanner, et al | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20020127346 | Heber | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030098364 | Jameson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030223886 | Keilman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040039375 | Miyazawa | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040045547 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040191405 | Kerrigan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197585 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204680 | Lal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204750 | Dinh | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211362 | Castro et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215313 | Cheng | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215336 | Udipi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220610 | Kreidler et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224001 | Pacetti et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234748 | Stenzel | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236399 | Sundar | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249449 | Shanley et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050043788 | Luo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058768 | Teichman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064088 | Fredrickson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070936 | Pacetti | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070997 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070051307 | Babaev | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070295832 | Gibson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080006714 | McNichols et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0416106 | Mar 1991 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090014551 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |