Patent Application
20080112056
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates, in general, to lens arrays and devices for use in viewing or displaying images that are interlaced to display animated, three-dimensional (3D), and other images, and, more particularly, to very thin lens arrays, as well as products incorporating such lens arrays and methods of fabricating such lens arrays, that include numerous, repeating sets of lenses or lens microstructures that are specialty configured for viewing an interlaced image by pairing each lens in the set or microstructure with only one of (or a smaller subset of) the interlaced image elements or slices.
2. Relevant Background
Elaborate graphics can be produced with lenticular graphic labels to provide three-dimensional (3D) and animated imagery such as a short clip of a movie. For example, lenticular lens material is used in the packaging industry for creating promotional material with appealing graphics and typically involves producing a sheet of lenticular lens material and adhesively attaching the lenticular lens material to a separately produced object for display. The production of lenticular lenses is well known and described in detail in a number of U.S. patents, including U.S. Pat. No. 5,967,032 to Bravenec et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,781,761 to Raymond.
In general, the production process includes selecting segments from visual images to create a desired visual effect, slicing each segment into a predefined number of slices or elements (such as 10 to 30 or more slices per segment), and interlacing the segments and their slices (i.e., planning the layout of the numerous images). Lenticular lenses or lens sheets are then mapped to the interlaced or planned segments, and the lenticular lenses are fabricated according to this mapping. The lenticular lenses generally include a transparent web that has a flat side or layer and a side with optical ridges and grooves formed by linear or elongated lenticules (i.e., lenses) arranged side-by-side with the lenticules or optical ridges extending parallel to each other over the length of the transparent web. To provide the unique visual effects, ink (e.g., four color ink) is applied to or printed directly on the flat side of the transparent web to form a thin ink layer, which is then viewable through the transparent web of optical ridges.
Each lenticule or lens of the lenticular layer is paired or mapped to a fairly large set or number of the interlaced image slices or elements. For example, one lenticule may be paired with 10to 30 or more interlaced image slices or elements associated with the image segments, and generally only one of the slices is visible through the lenticule at a time based on the position of the lenticule relative to a viewer's eye. In other words, the animation, 3D, or other graphic effect is achieved by moving the lenticule or the viewer's position to sequentially view each of the interlaced image slices under the lenticule and allow a viewer to see each segment of the image by combining the slices viewed from all the lenticules.
In producing conventional lenticular lens material, it is desirable to use as little material as possible, i.e., to produce effective lenticules or lenticular lens arrays with as thin as web material as possible. Decreasing lens thickness is also desirable to facilitate fabrication using techniques such as web printing that are very difficult or impractical with thicker lens materials. Thin lenticular lens material is desired to save on material costs and to provide a relatively flexible lens material or substrate that can be easily applied to products and product containers, such as in a label that can be attached to a box or to a bottle as part of a wraparound label or on a cup to provide desirable visual effects. To make lenticular lens materials thinner, the whole structure must be properly scaled downward together. In other words, the lenticules and the printed interlaced image must be shrunk or made smaller together to allow proper mapping of the image slices to the lenticules.
However, such shrinking of the lenticules has proven very difficult with limitations associated with printing the interlaced images often preventing the lens layer or web being made very thin. As noted above, all the interlaced slices for each segment are placed underneath a single lenticule such that numerous slices have to be printed with very little width to be mapped to the lenticules width or pitch. However, the printing can presently only be done with a limited degree of resolution, and this forces the lenticular lens material due to printing practicalities and resolution to be provided in coarser frequencies ranging from about 10 lenticules per inch (LPI) to about 200 LPI. With coarser lens arrays (i.e., with lower frequency or LPI), the printing can be accomplished more easily and mapping to lenticules of the image slices achieved more accurately. However, coarser lens arrays with frequencies of 10 to 30 LPI tend to be very thick because general physics or optical rules for focusing with conventional lenticular material require that more lens thickness or more lens material be provided to achieve effective focusing. For example, a 15 LPI lenticular lens array with a fairly common viewing angle (such as a 22-degree viewing angle) may be mapped to an interlaced image that is printed or provided directly behind the lenticular lens array, with each of the lenticules in the lens array being mapped to or paired with all image slices of a paired segment of the interlaced image. If the lens array is formed from acrylic, the lens array would need to be about ⅜-inch thick to enable the lenticules to properly focus on the paired image slices. Conversely, the frequency of the lenticular lens array may be increased (i.e., a finer lens array may be used). However, existing limitations on printing have resulted in the thinnest lenticular lens arrays being at least about 15 to 30 mils thick, and the mapping accuracy required at these lower thicknesses and higher lenticule frequencies often results in lower quality imaging results and increased fabrication or printing costs.
There remains a need for a lens array or structure that provides an alternative to conventional lenticular lens arrays so that lens arrays or structures can be provided with less thickness and with enhanced mapping of interlaced image slices or elements to the lens array for improved visual effects. Preferably, such a new lens array would be easy and inexpensive to fabricate, would be well suited for fabrication with thicknesses less than presently achievable with lenticular lens materials (e.g., less than about 15 to 20 mils), and would still be useful for providing desired viewing angles (e.g., 20 to 40 degree viewing angles or the like) to view conventional interlaced images (e.g., images interlaced as for use with conventional lenticular material to achieve 3D, animation, or other visual effects).
The present invention addresses the above problems by using lens substrates or arrays formed to include numerous lens microstructures or lens sets. Each of these lens microstructures can be used to provide the functionality of a much thicker lenticule or lens of conventional lenticular material as each of the lens microstructures is paired to a set of interlaced image elements or slices, which may be printed digitally, printed with offset printing, printed using web printing, or the like. The lenses of the lens microstructure are each used to focus onto or from a small subset of the slices in a paired set rather than focusing on all of the slices of the set as is required of a lenticule in conventional lenticular technology. Further, the lenses of the lens set or microstructure are each uniquely configured (e.g., with a differing cross sectional shape) to provide its own main viewing direction or focus line/direction such that each lens in a lens microstructure displays the small subset of images (e.g., 1 to 3 images) to which it is mapped and with a lens-specific viewing angle or angular distribution. In practice, the lens microstructures have an overall viewing angle that is generally the combination of the angular distribution of each lens of the lens microstructure with the focus lines or directions of each lens selected such that only select ones of the image elements or slices are displayed or visible as a viewer's line of sight moves through the overall viewing angle. The lens arrays may be significantly thinner than possible or practical with convention lenticular material (e.g., 50 to 90 percent or more reduction in lens thickness), which allows the “paper thin” arrays to be applied to or provided integrally in numerous product surfaces such as in printed labels, attached decals or labels, book jackets, magazine covers, wraparound labels, and many other print and packaging applications.
An ongoing problem with traditional lenticular lens material used to focus on and magnify printed interlaced images is that the lens arrays or material had to be relatively thick to be effective. Lenticular arrays need to be manufactured to follow optical laws or laws of physics such as Snell's Law such that the focus of these lenticules is determined by the radius of the lens and index of refraction of the lenticular material combined with other parameters including frequency and array thickness. A general problem with lenticular arrays is that in order to decrease the thickness of the lens or associated array thickness to lower costs and to enhance its application (e.g., thick plastic lens material does not process well, is difficult or impossible to bend, and is hard to wrap on curved surfaces), the frequency of the lenticules in the array must be increased (e.g., the lenticules per inch or LPI must be increased). As the frequency is increased, the thickness of the lens or lens array may be decreased, but, unfortunately, the quality of the displayed image or visual effect generally also decreases. More specifically, as the lenticule frequency is increased and the thickness is decreased, the ability to print high quality interlaced images to produce 3D and animation becomes exponentially more difficult because the slices or image elements have to be provided at very fine widths, i.e., at high frequencies. For example, if it were desired to use a 12-mil thick lenticular lens array, the lenticules would have to be provided at a very high frequency (such as about 167 LPI) to produce a quality display and the image elements may need to provide sets of twelve images under each lenticule. As can be appreciated, printing an interlaced image for such a lens array becomes quite difficult and cannot be done with some printing techniques such as roll form as the image elements have widths of 0.000139 inches ( 1/167-inch divided by 12), which is impractical for most printing applications particularly a CMYK format in which all colors must register accurately in this small space or slice width.
With lens arrays using the lens microstructures or lens sets of the invention, the lens microstructures can be configured so as to provide the function provided by a thick conventional lenticule by using a number of thin lenses that are individually configured to focus on a subset of image slices (such as 1 to 3 slices rather than a whole set of 4 to 12 or more slices). The lens arrays can be imprinted with the lens microstructures on a thin film at a very high rate of speed. In one example, a high quality image display assembly is achieved with a 3-mil thick lens array having lens sets or microstructures on one side provided at 40 lens sets per inch (LPI) and an interlaced image on the other side. The interlaced image can be printed rapidly such as at up to 2,000 feet per minute or faster on a web press or similar device. To achieve a similar display capability with a conventional lenticular lens array may require a frequency of 40 LPI and a thickness of about 80 mils or more. From these few examples, it can be seen that the use of lens microstructures to generate a lens array provides a significant decrease in material costs, allows very thin lens arrays or substrates to be used in numerous applications for which conventional lenticular material is not practical, and greatly simplifies manufacturing by, for example, allowing printing of interlaced images at lower frequency or fineness.
More particularly, a lens microstructure is provided for use in lens arrays for displaying interlaced images. The lens microstructure includes a substrate or layer of material that is transparent or at least translucent to light. The structure further includes a linear or elongated center lens on a lens side of the substrate. First and second sets of linear or elongated side lenses are positioned adjacent the center lens to extend parallel to the center lens. Each of the lenses is configured to provide a differing or unique focus direction or focus line such that the lens microstructure has an overall viewing angle that is a combination of an angular distribution of the center lens and angular distributions from each of the sides lenses (e.g., the focus of the structure steps out from the center lens with each side lens). In some embodiments, each of the angular distributions differs but in some cases the angular distributions are substantially equivalent across the lens microstructure (such as a value from the range of about 1 to 10 degrees). In some embodiments, an odd number of lenses are provided in the lens microstructure with an equal number provided in each side set, and further, the cross sectional shape of the first side set is preferably a mirror or reverse image of the second side set. The thickness of the substrate may vary, e.g., with each successive lens from the center lenses being slightly thicker, or the thickness of the substrate as measured at the peak or thickest part of each lens may be kept substantially constant such as less than 15 mils and in some cases 10 to 3 mils or less. The lens microstructure is configured for focusing on one set of slices in the interlaced image such as a segment set and each of the lenses preferably focuses on a small subset such as 1 to 3 slices that may generally be positioned beneath or adjacent the corresponding lens. Lens arrays can readily be formed that include two or more of such lens microstructures to display an interlaced image, and numerous products that include such lens arrays and paired interlaced images may be fabricated to practice the invention.
According to another aspect of the invention, an assembly is provided for displaying an interlaced image. The assembly includes an interlaced image, which may be digitally printed, web printed, or the like, with sets of elongate image elements or slices. A lens array is provided with a first side proximate the interlaced image such as a planar surface and a second side distal the image with a plurality of lens sets. Each of the lens sets is paired with one of the sets of the image elements and includes a number of linear or elongate lenses that are each mapped to a subset of the image elements in a corresponding one of the paired sets. Generally, each of the lenses is configured with a cross sectional shape that allows the lens to focus light from the subset of image elements (e.g., from one of the image elements). Each of the lenses may be configured to provide a lens-specific viewing angle with a particular focus line, and in some preferred embodiments, the focus lines to the paired image element subset is chosen to differ from other lenses (e.g., each lens has a unique focus direction such that the viewing angles are additive to provide an overall viewing angle for the lens set). The interlace image may be printed directly onto the first side of the lens array (with or without a primer first being applied) or an adhesive layer may be used to attach a separate substrate or sheet with the image to the first side of the lens array. In some cases, each of the lens sets includes an odd number of lenses (e.g., 5 to 21 or more lenses), and the lens sets may be provided at a frequency in the lens array from 5 to 75 lens sets per inch with a typical embodiment using a frequency of 10 to 30 lens sets per inch, with the particular frequency being selected to suit the interlaced image being displayed. An even number of lenses could be used to practice the invention. In this case, the sublenticules or lens on either side of a center line of the lens set could have distribution angles of plus/minus 2 degrees for example, but, it will be understood that this example does not need to be explained in detail as it is nearly equivalent to the case of a lens or sublenticule provided on such a center line of a lens set.
According to another aspect of the invention, an image display apparatus is provided that includes an interlaced image made up of a plurality of image elements each having a particular or predefined width. A lens substrate is provided in the display apparatus with a planar side positioned proximate to the interlaced image (e.g., the image may be printed on the planar side or attached with a transparent adhesive). The lens substrate includes a lens side distal to opposite the planar side. The lens side includes numerous lens microstructures that are each made up of a plurality of lenses. Each of these lenses is paired or mapped to one of the image elements so as to focus light passing through the lens substrate to a width of about the width of one of the image elements and to direct the light onto the paired one of the image elements (e.g. each lens in a lens microstructure is used to display one of the image elements in the interlaced image rather than a larger set of such image elements). The image elements are grouped into segment sets including a number of the image elements, and the lens microstructures each have the same cross sectional shape that defines the shape of each lens in the microstructure, with the cross sectional shape chosen to map each lens with one of the image elements. In some embodiments, an odd number of lenses are provided in each of the lens structures such as by providing a center lens with a particular focusing direction (e.g., perpendicular to the planar side of the lens substrate) and side lenses extending from both sides of the center lens. The center and side lenses each have unique or distinct focusing direction or focal lines that are selected such that the angular distributions of all the lenses are generally additive or combinable to define an overall viewing angle (e.g., 20 to 45 degrees or another viewing angle useful for displaying interlaced images) for the lens microstructure.
According to still another aspect of the invention a display assembly is provided that utilizes the concept of dual lens structures to achieve enhanced brightness levels and to control mixing of reflected images. The assembly includes an interlaced image including sets of elongated image elements or interlaces. A lens array is provided with a first side proximate to the interlaced image and a second side including a plurality of lens sets or microstructures. Each of the lens sets is paired with one of the sets of image elements and each of the lens sets includes a plurality of elongate lenses or sublenticules that are each mapped to one or more of the image elements. Adjacent ones of the lenses in each lens set are paired to form a plurality of dual lens structures, with a first or left lens in each dual lens structure distributing reflected light from the paired image(s) in a first viewing or direction angle and a second or right lens distributing light in a second viewing or direction angle that differs from the first viewing angle. For example, the left and right lenses may be sloped to have viewing angles of equal magnitude but opposite sign or direction relative to a plane passing through the dual lens structure (e.g., one angle may be negative and the other positive or vice versa).
The magnitude of the viewing angles may be the same within a dual lens structure but, typically, the magnitude will differ for at least some of the dual lens structures. In this manner, a lens set with two or more dual lens structures will be able to display four or more image elements (unless there is repeating or duplication of the image elements). In some embodiment, at least two of the dual lens structures are formed with similar or even identical cross sectional shapes such that the lenses of the structures provide similar or identical viewing angles. In such embodiments, the interlaced image includes image elements that are duplicated or repeated and duplicate or equivalent content interlaces or image elements are placed under similarly shaped ones of the lenses (i.e., under dual lens structures having like viewing angles). The lens array may have a thickness of less than about 15 mils and often less than about 10 mils such as about 2 to 5 mils while the lens sets may have a pitch of less than about 20 mils such as 7 to 10 mils or the like. In some embodiments, dual lens structures with larger magnitude viewing angles are provided as the outer or exterior structures within the lens set, and if the interlaced image includes image elements that are to be viewed in a particular sequence, the image elements are ordered in the image set with the first to be viewed under the lenses from the largest negative viewing angles to the largest positive viewing angles (with any duplicated images being placed under lenses with like viewing angles).
Briefly, the present invention is directed to lens arrays that can be used to reduce or even replace the use of conventional lenticular material. With conventional lenticular material, numerous elongated or linear lenticules or lenses are provided in a clear or translucent web or layers. Each lenticule is used to provide a viewing angle (e.g., 15 to 40 degrees or the like and more typically about 20 to 35 degrees) through which a plurality of interlaced slices of an image segment is visible to a viewer. For example, an interlaced image may be printed on the smooth side of the lenticular material web with the set of slices, which may number 5 to 20 or more, for a segment of the image being mapped to a particular lenticule such that the slices can be viewed separately as the material or the viewer's line of sight is moved across the viewing angle. The interlaced image with its interlaced image slices or elements can in this way be viewed to achieve visual effects such as 3D, animation, and the like. A significant problem with conventional lenticular material is that the lenticule (or the lenticular material) must be relatively thick to effectively focus onto the numerous image slices paired with the lenticule. For example, the thinnest conventional lenticular material used today is at least about 15 mils but the printing and mapping requirements generally have led the printing and packaging industry to use lenticular material or lenticules that are at least about 20 mils thick.
In contrast, the lens arrays of the present invention can be thought of as replacing each of these conventional lenticules with a lens set or lens microstructure. The lens set is configured with a number of lenses or “sublenticules” that are each paired with a smaller subset of slices of a segment. For example, a conventional lenticule may be used to provide a viewing angle to selectively view 15 image slices of a segment of an interlaced image. A lens set or lens microstructure of a lens array of the invention would, instead, use lenses or sublenticules that are each mapped or paired with one of the image slices instead of to all 15 image slices or elements. Each of the lenses of the lens set is configured to provide a “step” or portion of the viewing angle, e.g., if the viewing angle is 30 degrees in the 15-lens example each lens would provide a step of about 2 degrees such that the lens set provided the same or similar viewing angle as a conventional lenticule. However, the thickness of the lens set can be significantly less than that of a conventional lenticule to provide the same or similar effect. For example, it is likely that lens arrays may be effective with thicknesses of less than about 15 mils and even less than about 3 mils (while, of course, lens assemblies with thicknesses greater than 15 mils may be used in some applications).
The lens arrays of the present invention would include a number of the lens sets or lens microstructures similar in number to the lenticules of lenticular material, and the lens sets may be defined by frequency similar to lenticules at a particular LPI (e.g., lens sets per inch or lenticules per inch) and the overall pitch of the lens set or lens microstructure is often the same or similar to the pitch of the lenticule it is used to replace. An interlaced image may be produced for a conventional lenticular material such as for a 20 LPI lenticular lens material, and the lens sets may be provided in a lens array with 20 lens sets per inch or at 20 LPI. The lens arrays produced according to the invention are typically paired with an interlaced image that may be printed onto the smooth side of the lens array (which may be formed from plastic, glass, or other transparent to translucent material) or may be applied to the back or smooth side of the lens array with an adhesive (e.g., with the printed interlaced image provided on a substrate such as plastic, paper, or the like). The combination of the interlaced image and the lens array forms an image display assembly, device, or product of the invention that produces high quality 3D, animation, and other visual effects but with a 50 to 90 percent or more reduction in thickness (i.e., with ultrathin lens arrays).
The lens array 110 includes a number of lens sets or lens microstructures 116 that extend across one of the surfaces of the lens array 110 (or may be provided in a select portion). The lens sets 116 illustrated each include a number or plurality of linear or elongated lenses or lens elements 117. The lenses 117 and useful configurations for the lens sets or microstructures 116 are explained in more detail with reference to
Rather than printing directly on the lens array 110, it may be desirable to form image display assemblies by applying an interlaced image on a substrate or with a plastic, paper, or other backer or liner onto the lens array 110.
As shown, the display assembly 600 includes a lens set or lens microstructure 610 with a first side or surface including lenses and a second side or surface 611 that may be smooth or textured and upon which a printed image 640, such as an interlaced image, is printed (or applied with an adhesive such as shown in
The lens set 610 is configured in the illustrated example to include an odd number of lenses (i.e., 11 in this example) with the number of lenses typically selected to match the number of slices of interlaced image 640 that are paired with the lens set 610 such as the number of interlaces provided for each image segment in the image 640. As shown, the lenses of lens set 610 may be thought of as divided into a center lens or lens element 612 and sets of side lenses 620, 630 (e.g., left and right lens sets). The left and right lens sets 620, 630 mirror each other in their configuration. For example, the lens 622 immediately adjacent the center lens 612 in the left lens set 620 is identical in cross sectional shape as the lens 632 immediately adjacent the center lens 612 in the right lens set 630 except that it is the mirror or reverse image.
The lens 612 is configured to focus on a paired slice 642 of the interlaced image 640 through a particular viewing angle, such as a fraction of an overall viewing angle selected for the lens set 610, and in a particular direction, such as when a viewer's line of sight is substantially perpendicular to the image 640 and lens set 610. The left lens set 620 and right lens set 630 each include one or more lenses that are used to view the interlaced image 640 when the line of sight is changed from perpendicular or near perpendicular. Each lens in the sets 620, 630 provides its own step or particular viewing angle that focuses light from interlaces or slices of the interlaced image that are paired with each lens (e.g., a subset of the interlaces such as one slice as shown in
As discussed above, each of the lenses in the lens set or lens microstructure 610 may be configured individually to focus on a paired image element or slice and/or to direct reflected light from such slice or element in a particular direction and with a particular viewing angle. As shown in the example of
A next step is added or provided by the contribution of lenses 624 and 636 of the left and right side lens sets 620, 630. These lenses 624, 636 provide the same angular step as the lenses 622, 632 or, in some cases, a smaller or larger step. In the above example, each of these lenses 624, 636 may provide another 3 degree step or angular distribution that is directed so as to be additive to the viewing angle provided by lenses 612, 622, 632 such that the overall viewing angle of these 5 lenses is 15 degrees with differing ones of the slices of interlaced image 640 being displayed or, visible based on the line of sight (e.g., slice 648 is paired with lens 624 and is generally only visible when the display assembly 600 is positioned or the viewer moves to an angle that provides a line of sight falling within the 3-degree viewing angle of the lens 624). Such step increases or additions to the overall viewing angle provided by the lens set 610 are continued until outer side lenses 628 and 638 are included, and the assembly 600 is formed by providing additional lens sets configured similarly to lens set 610 to abut or contact the edge lenses 628, 638 (e.g., another lens configured similar to lenses 638, 628, respectively).
To maintain the thickness, tLens Array, of the lens set 610 at a particular thickness (e.g., less than 15 mils for example) each of the lenses in the side sets 620, 630 is provided with a vertical side edge as shown with edge 623, 625, 633, 637 for side lenses 622, 624, 632, 636. An exemplary vertical side edge 623 is shown in
Now, with reference to
A thickness, tLens Array, is then selected such as less than about 15 mils or a greater thickness. In some embodiments, the lens array thickness, tLens Array, is selected so it is related to the width of the lenses of the lens set 610 such as to be a little larger or thicker than the width of each of the lenses (but, typically, much smaller than the thickness of a conventional lenticule, tLenticule, used to focus on the interlaced slices previously chosen for the lens set 610). The overall viewing angle is selected and the viewing angle or angular step or difference for each lens is chosen (such as by dividing the overall viewing angle by the number of lenses in the lens set 610), or the individual lens angular steps or distributions may be set and these steps may be combined to define the overall viewing angle for the lens set 610. The values of the viewing angles for each lens and its associated image slice can be individually selected in some embodiments, which is not possible with conventional lenticular structures.
To start the theoretical construction of a lens of the lens set, a ray is traced from each interlace or image element position on the printed substrate 640 associated with the lens set 610 being designed. An initial trace is made to the center of the lens element under construction that has temporarily been set to the desired thickness, tLens Array. The slope of the lens element (e.g., of a segment of such lens element between two knots) at that point is adjusted to refract the ray in the desired angular direction for the lens element being generated, e.g., the center lens or lens element 612. Then, a small increment along the direction perpendicular to the lens set 610 axis is made in one direction (e.g., left or right), and the starting point of the next lens segment of the lens element or lens, is the ending point of the previous lens segment. The next or second segment of the lens element being constructed is connected to the end of the first segment and a slope is found for the next or second segment to refract a ray in a desired direction (i.e., onto a particular location where an image slice is anticipated to be positioned). This process is repeated until a left or right boundary of the lens element is reached and the segment-by-segment process is repeated for the segments between knots in the other direction (right or left) until the other boundary of the lens element or lens is reached. If a thickness overage occurs (e.g., over a preset overage limit to achieve a desired lens array thickness), this thickness overage may be subtracted and the process repeated to regenerate the lens element. After completion of this lens element, a ray is sent from the next or adjacent interlaced image slice to the center of a new lens or lens element, e.g. through the center of lens 622 or 632 after completion of lens element 612. The slope of the segment of the next lens element is adjusted so as to send the traced ray in a desired angular direction (e.g., a step from the angular direction of the prior lens element such as a 3 degree or other angular; step value from 90 degrees when the prior lens element is the center lens 612). The surface of the lens set 610 is built up in this stepwise or piecewise fashion until a boundary of the lens set 610 is reached such as at the outer edge of lens 628 or 638 as shown in
Such an iterative process may result in lenses that increase in thickness from the center lens 612. In some embodiments, a maximum thickness is chosen for the edge lenses 628, 638 and the center lens 612 is provided at a thickness that is lower than this maximum or alternatively, side edges such as edges 623, 625, 633, 637 (and edges 613 on center lens 612) are provided to prevent or control the thickness of lenses from increasing or to retain a constant thickness for the lens set 610. Should any lens or lens element of the lens set 610 include a lens that causes total internal reflection instead of refracting rays in a desired direction, a linear interpolation of the slope may be made to the end of the lens element (such as element 612, 622, 624 or the like) from that lens or lens element. Then, after a lens element has been designed, the process may be restarted by starting a ray at the next interlace or slice position and repeating the process, but designing the lens element for the desired refracted angle for the interlace or slice under consideration.
The lens set 610 of
A computer program listing is provided at the end of this description that may be run to perform the design steps described in the preceding paragraphs for a lens set of the present invention such as lens set 610. The computer program may be run on nearly any well known computing device with a processor or CPU, memory, and a monitor, and the program may be implemented with a computer system running the program with code devices for making the computer perform the steps shown in the program listing (not shown with a figure as such a block diagram is not believed necessary to understand the invention). The program listing provides the details of the algorithm that is used for designing or configuring lens set such as lens set 610 as described generally above, but it should be noted that only the code or routines associated with these design steps is provided with supporting subroutines that perform refraction, array handling, and the like being excluded for simplicity and brevity sake as these subroutines are well-known to those skilled in the optical arts. Note, the program listing uses the term “lenticules” in place of “lens” or “lens element” as used in the description of the algorithm provided above but this term is used at least in the listing in its more generic or broad sense as a synonym for lens.
The following is a brief description of the computer program or program listing and provides some important ideas used to generate the lens microstructures of the invention. The entire lens array is typically made up of lens sets (microstructures). The lens sets have individual sub lenticular elements that are to be generated mathematically here or by the algorithms of the computer program. Each sublenticule or lens cress section is built up from short line segments each of which are connected at one end to a previously calculated end. The slope of each line segment is adjusted to refract a ray from the interlace location through the segment in the desired direction. The free end of that segment, which slope was determined, is now the location of the start of the next segment. The initial starting point for each sublenticule is the center of the sublenticule. After all of the points are determined for all the sublenticules, customary cubic spline fitting routines are use to characterize the curves. See, for example, “Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing,” William H. Press et al., 1986 (e.g., at page 88 and other portions of the text).
The usual methods of program data entry are used to input the following design parameters: pitch of the lens set; number of sublenticules in lens set; angular step of distribution from sublenticule to sublenticule; index of refraction of lenticular material; thickness of lenticules/lens array; slope limit; sidewalls (e.g., yes or no which sets whether the thickness is held constant for the lens/sublenticules in the lens set); and step size of knots in forming each sublenticule. The subroutines for ray refraction are well-known optics procedures and omitted here in the sake of brevity and ease of explanation of the more pertinent features of the invention. Ray intersections of planes and cubic splines curves are also omitted as these are standard routines used in computer graphics programs. The methodology starts at the desired thickness in the center of each sub lenticule and calculates each part of the lenticule first in the negative direction and then restarts in the center and calculates in the positive direction using the endpoints of the sublenticule. The endpoints were previously calculated from the pitch of the lens set and the number of the sublenticules.
In some embodiments, lens arrays of the invention such as a lens array with lens sets or lens microstructures 610 is formed by first machining or generating a mold that is used to form the lenses of the lens sets and lens arrays such as from plastic or the like. The mold may be generated using an air bearing lathe and precise diamond tooling. In one implementation, the lathe and tooling may have a 0.01 micron or similar resolution to insure that a good optical surface is obtained from the mold. A number of materials may be used for the material of the mold such as a soft brass that can be cut by a diamond to form the tool for the plastic (or other transparent to translucent material) lens array. In some cases, the mold or forming tool for the arrays may be made of a material that is relatively soft and that may not be useful for providing many impressions as would be required for high production runs. In these cases, electroforms may be made such as in a two step process to get the correct polarity of the structure. Further, in some cases, the straight side walls of the side lenses such as side wall 623 shown in
A check on or verification of the effectiveness of the design of a lens array such as array 610 of display assembly 600 may be obtained by a non-sequential ray trace as shown in
The lens set 610 of the display assembly 600 of
While the number and combination of lens numbers and image slices are too numerous to detail here and would be apparent to those skilled in the art with the above description, it may be useful to provide at least one additional example of a lens set configuration.
The lenses 1112, 1115, and 1118 may be configured or generated to have a particular cross sectional shape as shown with the configuration or design process discussed above and detailed in the algorithm shown in the program listing. The lenses 1112, 1115, 1118 are paired or mapped to image elements or slices 1144 in the interlaced image 1140. In this example, a single lens is paired with each slice 1144 (but a lens may be used to focus light from more than one slice 1144). In one embodiment of the lens set 1110, the lenses 1112, 1115, 1118 are each designed to deviate rays 8 degrees apart relative to the neighboring or adjacent lens in the lens set 1110. In other words, each lens of the lens set 1110 is adapted to provide an angular distribution or lens-specific viewing angle of about 8 degrees and the direction to focus line (or main direction) for each lens is selected such that the angular distributions are additive over the lens set 1110 (e.g., generally do not overlap or only overlap a relatively small amount). Hence, the lens set 1110 of this example would have an overall viewing angle of about 40 degrees (or 5 times 8 degrees). It should be again noted that the angular difference or lens-specific viewing angle does not have to be consistent across the lens set 1110, and in some cases, each lens of the set 1110 may have a different angular distribution. Mote typically, when the angular difference or distribution is varied, a regular pattern is used such as by setting the center lens 1112 at one lens-specific viewing angle, the pair of lenses on either side of the center lens 1112 at a different lens-specific viewing angle, the pair of lenses adjacent to these two lenses moving outward in the lens set 1110 at yet another lens-specific viewing angle, and so on. In other cases, the center lens 1112 has one angular distribution and each of the side lenses 1115, 1118 has the same angular distribution (but, of course, with a differing main direction or focus line).
The display assembly 1100 of
The lens set embodiments previously discussed with reference to
The lens set 1210 includes eleven lenses but the number may be modified to practice the invention, and the lens set 1210 is made up of a center lens 1212, a left set 1214 of side lenses 1215, and a right set 1216 of side lenses 1217. In this embodiment, the left set 1214 and right set 1216 have cross sections that are selected to be mirror or reverse images when viewed from a plane passing through the center line of lens 1212. The thickness, tCenter, of the center lens 1212 is less than each of the side lenses 1215, 1217 which have thicknesses, t1, t2, . . . , tx, that increase in a stepwise fashion as the outer edges of the lens set 1210 are approached. In this manner, the lenses 1215, 1217 can be formed without requiring a sharp or abrupt edge but can instead be a continuous curved surface between the end points or edges of adjacent or neighboring lenses.
To generate the cross sectional profile of the lens set 1210, the design or generation algorithm discussed above can be used with some minor modifications (and see the program listing at the end of this description). An exemplary design or generation process may begin with setting a desired thickness, tCenter, for the center lens (or inner pair of lenses if an even number of lenses is used) 1212 for focusing light from the inner image element or slice 1226. The center lens 1212 is generated as discussed for center lens 612 of
As shown in
In another modeled and tested (i.e., via ray tracing) lens array of the invention, the lens array included lens sets or microstructures with 19 lenses including a center lens and right and left lens subsets of 9 lenses each. The overall viewing angle of each microstructure was about 38 degrees with each lens providing an angular separation or step of about 2 degrees. The overall pitch of the lens set was 0.5588 millimeters (mm) and the array was provided at a relatively constant maximum thickness of about 0.0508 mm. Sidewalls were included in the side set lenses with an angle of 88 degrees (or 2 degrees from vertical). The lenses were formed in the generation algorithm using 22 steps for each lenticule (with a step size or DelX, of 1.33684210526316E-03) with a slope limit of 76 degrees. Ray tracing with the assumption that the material used to form the lens array had an index of refraction of 1.4 was successful in showing focusing on an image placed under the center of each of the 19 lens in the lens array.
In a similar embodiment, a lens array was modeled in which each lens microstructure had the same number of lenses in its lens sets (i.e., 19 lenses in each lens set) and the same thickness and overall pitch. However, in this lens array, the overall viewing angle was about 76 degrees and each lens provided an angle step size of about 4 degrees rather than 2 degrees as used in the prior embodiment. Other parameters including the number of steps and step size used to form or generate the modeled lens of the lens, microstructure were retained as was the index of refraction of 1.4. The lens set or lens microstructure was again subjected to ray tracing, and the results again showed very accurate focusing upon a single interlaced image positioned under or on the back or opposite side of the lens array (e.g., as would be the case if the interlaced image were printed or otherwise positioned to abut the planar back side of the lens array). This embodiment is useful for showing the ability to select a particular number of lenses for each lens set and then to design these lenses to each have a structure to provide a desired overall viewing angle for the lens set by providing a particular angular distribution or step for each lens in the microstructure.
In another embodiment of the invention, a lens array was modeled (i.e., generated using the generation algorithm described herein) that used lens sets with 7 lenses including a center lens and side subsets each having 3 lenses. In this embodiment, the following parameters were used: lens set pitch of 0.2 mm; a lens array thickness of 0.0762 mm; angular step size (or angular separation) of about 5 degrees to provide an overall viewing angle of about 35 degrees; an index of refraction for the lens array material of 1.4; vertical sidewalls (i.e., at 90 degrees from the planar back side of the lens array); and 22 steps used to generate each lens with a step size of 1.29870129870913E-03 mm and slope limit of 74 degrees. The modeled or generated lens microstructure was subjected to ray tracing to test its ability to focus light upon a single slice or image element from a set of interlaced images, and the ray tracing plot proved the efficacy of lens arrays using this embodiment of lens sets or microstructures to display interlaced images.
An additional lens array embodiment was modeled that altered this 7 lens per lens set embodiment by modifying two parameters. Specifically, the index of refraction for the lens array material was changed to 1.64 to show that the lens arrays of the invention can be formed from a variety of materials and still provide desired focusing results. Also, the angle step size or angular distribution was increased to 6 degrees such that each lens set provided a viewing angle of about 42 degrees rather than 35 degrees. The lens microstructure generation algorithm was utilized to generate a lens set or microstructure with these parameters or characteristics, and ray tracing of this modeled lens set verified that the lens set is capable of focusing light upon one or more interlaced images positioned adjacent each lens over the desired viewing angle of 42 degrees with each lens providing an angular step or separation of about 6 degrees. From these and the previous specific examples, it will be appreciated that the general concepts of the lens sets or microstructures used to form lens arrays for displaying interlaced images can be used to generate a huge variety of lens arrays simply be altering one or more of the design parameters. This allows a designer to select the parameters that are important to them such as viewing angle, number of interlaced image elements that need to be displayed under each lens microstructure, or the like and then to generate lenses for each microstructure with a geometry that provides these desired results or satisfies the input parameters.
The use of lens microstructures or lens sets in lens arrays to bend and focus light in order to view interlaced images provides an effective alternative to conventional lenticular technology. Lens arrays with properly formed/generated micro lens structures can replace lenticular lens arrays and allow viewing of interlaced images. Significantly, the use of lens arrays of the invention can decrease lens mass and/or thickness such as up to 90 percent or more reductions. The lens design criteria of conventional lenticular materials (i.e., including the requirement that the lenticule provides a thickness that allows focusing on a large set of interlaced slices) do not apply to these structures as the lens sets are used to replace the much larger and thicker conventional lenticules, but the lens microstructures or lens sets remain optically sound for imaging and generally are not diffractive. The micro lens set designs follow optical characterizations such as Lambert's law and Snell's law, but the lenses of each lens set act together as a group to display interlaced images paired or mapped to the lenses, thereby replicating the function of traditional lenticular lens arrays. However, they are not traditional lenticular lens arrays in part because the lens sets are not uniform lens arrays with all lenticules having identical cross sections but instead, each lens in a lens set or lens microstructure is configured to provide a unique focus line (or main direction) over a lens-specific viewing angle.
The lens arrays and their plurality of repeating lens microstructures can be formed from plastic, glass, ceramics, or other transparent to translucent materials from or using coatings, films, and/or other substrates. The lens microstructures can be custom designed for the combination of interlaced images and, as discussed, may have a pre-engineered overall viewing angle and lens-specific viewing angles or angular distributions and are also pre-engineered as to the number of interlaced images under the lens set or lens microstructure. Unlike conventional lenticular lenses, a lens array of the present invention can be used to replicate the functionality of a very coarse lenticular lens array without adding much (or any) mass to the array (e.g., without requiring a thicker lens array as the lens array becomes coarser or a lower LPI). For instance, a 15 LPI conventional lenticular lens array with a 22-degree viewing angle would likely require about a ⅜″ thick lens array if made of acrylic. In contrast, a lens array with the lens microstructures of the invention can be made at about 3 mils thickness but yet perform similarly to the conventional lenticular lens array or better but yet use less than about 5 percent of the mass or lens array thickness.
It may be useful to elaborate at this time on exemplary methods of manufacturing and/or tooling the lens arrays of the present invention and more particularly, the lens sets or lens microstructure of the present invention as well as image display devices and products that incorporate such lens arrays. In some embodiments, the lens microstructures of a lens array can be engraved in a cylinder or plate, with care taken to be extremely accurate to create the proper optics. A preferred method of engraving is using an air bearing lathe and custom diamond tooling. Air bearing lathes operate by spinning the cylinder or cylinder with shim or plate on a cushion of air rather than bearings or other mechanical devices that can have worn gear slop or play. For the formation of the tool to create accurate lens microstructures of a lens array, it is preferable to provide accuracy at the micron level or even at the angstrom level.
In order to create an accurate embossing tool, custom diamond tools pre-engineered to a desired radius are made. As the lens elements are not usually defined by a particular radius, the cutting tools contour the embossing tool tangent to different parts of the radius tool as needed by the design determined by the usual cutting path of numerical control or N/C programmed machines. These tools mirror the desired design such as an array with lens sets shown in
Each of the microstructures may be as small as 10 microns or less and usually would be about 25 to 50 microns or more across. In some embodiments, each of the lens microstructures has a symmetrical center micro lens and a set of right hand and left hand lenses that mirror each other in design. Further in a typical embodiment, each of the sub structures or lenses on each side has an angle step that is pre-determined and the combination of the lens angular distribution or lens-specific viewing angles total the desired overall viewing angle of the lens microstructure or lens set. Prior to tooling or manufacture, the lens microstructures are adjusted/tuned and tested in a computer program, such as the program listing provided herein and/or with ray tracing programs, to verify where light rays focus to the image and back to a viewer. Each lens or microstructure within a lens set may be generated by providing or plotting 2 to over 100 data points, and these plotted data points can be adjusted for the numerous (e.g., millions) of possible combinations so as to enhance the use and function of the micro lens structure.
While one current known method of creating the embossing or extrusion tool, which in turn is used to form the lens arrays, is by using diamond tooling, other embodiments use laser etching or photo etching into nickel, carbon, copper or other metals to form the embossing or extrusion tool or to form molds. These alternative methods can result in accurate tooling but may require more extensive testing and development to provide the accurate three-dimensional shapes necessary to create the desired lens microstructures needed for lens arrays of the invention.
With the embossing tool, extrusion tool, mold formed, the fabrication of lens arrays with the lens sets or lens microstructures of the invention can be performed or completed. The lens microstructures and arrays with pluralities of such microstructures may be may be created by a number of manufacturing methods and into or using a variety of materials. The materials used for forming the lens arrays may be glass, nearly any type of clear (i.e., transparent to translucent) plastic including but not limited to PET, propylene, OPP, PVC, APET, acrylic, or any clear plastic, and/or a ceramic. In many embodiments, the preferred base material is a plastic, and the plastic may be extruded, calendared, cast, or molded with the tools formed as described above to provide a mirror image of the lens sets or lens microstructures arranged in a lens array (e.g., a plurality of side-by-side, linear lens sets selected in number to provide a desired frequency such as 10 to 50 LPI or another useful frequency to suit a particular interlaced image).
One preferred application or fabrication technique involves inline embossing at high speeds using a roll embossing tool. In this embodiment, a film is cast or extruded, and a pattern providing the lens array is placed into the film with a heat or chilled roller. A good film for this application is usually a stable film such as a PET, cast propylene film or, the like. These films can be embossed in thin films of less than one mil to 3 mils or more. A preferred thickness for lens arrays is in the two to five mil range. In this application, the film thickness with its lens microstructures can be pre-engineered to focus directly on the back of the film. The film itself can be printed in a web or roll form at very high rates of speed (e.g., over 2,000 feet per minute) in wide web applications. To form image display devices (such as labels; decals, cards, or the like), the film or sheet with lens arrays is mirror or reverse printed with the corresponding interlaced images. At this point, individual devices or products may be cut from the combined rolls or sheets. The film also may be embossed in a thickness that is less than the desired thickness for focus and printing so that an adhesive can be added to the film (i.e., between the lens array and the image slices) so that in combination the adhesive and the film provide the thickness required to focus to the interlaced images properly. The index of refraction of both the film and the adhesive in combination is taken into account in the overall formula or algorithm discussed above for generating lens sets or lens microstructures. In some cases, a film may also be co-extruded with a coating such as a UV, solvent, or water-based coating that may be embossed or extruded on the film with the micro structures built into the coating.
With a pre-made film, one can also print in a sheet or web form. The film can be applied over the printed (interlaced) image after the fact. This can be done using equipment such as thermal film, applicators like D and K, Bellhoffer and the like in which the film is heated and the adhesive is a hot melt chemistry made with EVA/polyethylene and is activated and applied in register to the printed and interlaced images. This can be done inline in a web process or in a sheet environment.
While extrusion techniques typically do not provide extreme film thinness and are primarily used to make plastics no thinner than 6 mils and usually between 6 and 30 mils, extrusion processes combined with the lens microstructures of the present invention can provide a much thinner lens array as opposed to traditional lenticular lens structures, which leads to a significant material cost savings as well as providing lens sheets or arrays that are very flexible and easy to apply to other structures/products. For example, a lens sheet or array can be extruded at a very coarse LPI for billboards and other applications in a relatively thin structure. In one implementation a 1 or 2 LPI lens for a billboard may require a lens structure of over 1″ thick plastic if fabricated with conventional lenticular lens material, but this can be done with a microstructure lens array of only about 20 mils thickness. Hence, extruded plastic lens arrays of the present invention are economical with respect to material costs and are practical while a conventional lenticular lens array in a thickness of over 1 inch is not cost effective and is impractical.
Another method of manufacturing image display assemblies with lens arrays of the invention is to print the interlaced images on paper or plastic and then either inline or offline, printing or applying a coating, which may be an e-beam, UV, or water-based coating. The coating is applied in a predetermined thickness, and the lens microstructures may be embossed into the coating to form the structures and a lens array over the interlaced image at high speed. Again, this may be done in line or offline in a sheet fed press such as a Heidelberg or Komori press or a web press such as a Goss, Heidelberg, Or other type of flexo or web offset press. Further, while most embodiments using an embossing tool would use a roll or cylinder for the embossing tool, in any of the above embodiments, it is also possible to use a platen press or flat plate to emboss films or coatings.
With these various methods of manufacturing lens arrays and products including the arrays generally understood, it may be useful to further explain some of the preferred methods of manufacturing lens arrays according to the invention beginning with film embossing. Film embossing is a preferred method of manufacture that is anticipated to be easily adapted for producing lens array or material with the lens sets of the present invention. In this embodiment of manufacture, there are several methods of performing the embossing. Embossing can occur at the time film is cast, calendared, or extruded. Normally, the embossing is done in line with a chilled embossing roller while the film is still hot. The pressure is applied between a bottom and top roller. For example, the bottom roller may be a polished roller and the top roller an engraved roller, e.g., made out of a nickel-coated copper that is accurately machined in an air bearing lathe. The hot film, which may be propylene, PET, cast PVC, calendar PVC, cast propylene, PETG, or any combination of film or co-extrusion. While the preferred substrate or film may be polyester or PET, any of the substrates can be used. PET films tend to be more stable and maintain the desired structure through the printing and embossing process better than many of the other films. It is also important to note that the refractive index of the material chosen preferably is matched to the desired structure to make microstructures that provide accurate focusing on interlaced images slices. Depending upon width, temperatures, pressures, and other factors, the film may be embossed at up to 10,000 feet per minute. One reason for using a chill roller in the film embossing process is that the molecules in the film form and freeze into place forming the microstructures more accurately when a hot film is embossed with a chill roller regardless of the process.
In some embodiments, cold film is used. Cold film can be heated and embossed with a hot roller forming the microstructures. This is normally done at slightly below the melting temperature or at the melting temperature of the film. The speed at which this embossing can be done is based upon the heat and pressure of the equipment available. For example but not as a limitation, if a substrate melts at about 300° F., embossing is preferably done at about that temperature and, in some cases, at about 6,000 feet per hour.
In other embodiments, cold embossing is used to form lens arrays of the present invention. Cold embossing can be done using extreme pressures between nip rollers while narrow web widths are easier and require less tonnage. It is possible, however, in some embodiments to emboss in wide web at up to and over 60-inch web widths. Such cold embossing of the lens arrays into plastic or other material substrates can be done at fairly high rates of speed such as up to about 10,000 feet per hour or more. This is done much the way holographic embossing patterns are embossed in film. The structures tend to be accurate, but the life of the tool is sometimes not very long due to the higher pressures utilized.
Film embossing to form lens arrays of the invention may also include platen embossing. Flat dies are engraved in copper, magnesium, nickel, and other metals. These dies are placed in equipment such as Bobst die cutters and Heidelberg's, Kluges, and other equipment manufacturers' die cutters, punches, presses, or the like used in platen embossing. The film may be fed through in rolls or in sheets and embossed with heat and pressure or just pressure to form the lens sets or lens microstructures on a side of the film or substrate. The microstructures can be embossed onto any of the films using pressure and/or heat and appropriate dwell time to form the microstructures. A significant tonnage or high pressure, such as that needed to emboss holograms, is generally used to emboss the film in the case of platen embossing. In this embodiment, one can have “spot” lens structures that can be registered to the printing in a way such that the lens does not always appear over the printing.
Another preferred method of forming lens arrays according to the present invention is by using an ultraviolet (UV) or e-beam coating to form the structures in a web over a film or substrate (i.e., the lens array would include both the substrate and the web/coating in its array thickness). In a first embodiment of such coating processes, a base film is used that may be any of the films mentioned above. The film may be coated with a UV coating at about 1 to 5 mils, and the coating can be cured through an engraved roller which may be glass or clear plastic. The roller is clear such that the UV or E-beam is directed to pass through the roller while it is in contact with the substrate and squeezing the coating into place on the base film, whereby the microstructures are formed exactly or within very tight tolerances while they are cured to form a lens array as shown in the included figures.
There are other preferred or alternative methods of using e-beam curing or UV curing to make lens arrays with lens microstructures rather than using a clear cylinder to shine UV light through while in contact with the embossing cylinder. For example, one coating method uses a modified laminator to emboss the pattern onto one surface of a film or substrate. This can be done or accomplished with very little pressure using an engraved cylinder and an application roller that applies UV or e-beam coating to the film (Which is likely to be propylene, PET, or the like). The coating on the film or substrate is then cured through the film while the film is in contact with the embossed roller. In this method, the speed can be in excess of 10,000 feet per hour and can be done without excessive wear on the embossing cylinder. A downside or possible issue with this method is the cost, which tends to be higher because of the UV liquid used to cast the impression. However, because most of the lens microstructures are less than a few microns deep, a thin coating is sufficient for producing the lens microstructures (e.g., a coating of less than about 1 mil and more typically less than about 0.3 mils such as about 0.25 mils may be used successfully to create a plurality of lens sets or microstructures with a coating).
In an alternative coating process, a base film is coated with any of the clear coatings mentioned above (keeping in mind that any coating and its refractive index is combined with the thickness and appropriate film refractive index for the appropriate and pre-engineered thickness of the lens array). After the coating is applied to the substrate, it is cured and then embossed. In some cases, the coating is only partially cured and then embossed while it is in a semi-liquid state. In some other cases, the coating on the substrate or base film is embossed in a total liquid state or more liquid state and then cured after the embossing such as down the web a few feet up to several hundred feet. In the former case where the liquid is partially cured, the coating may have a final curing later down the production line either immediately or down the web several feet, and in some cases, the coating may be pre-engineered to post cure in a solid state several hours or even days later to an acceptable hardness.
As shown in
In some embodiments, the film is applied with a water based adhesive, hot melt, or thermal adhesive such as is extruded in EVA or other methods directly onto the film with a hot melt polymer such as polyethylene, common to the thermal lamination area. Any adhesive used preferably is as clear as possible, and its refractive index is taken into account in the total calculation of each of the polymers and the thicknesses and combined appropriately to equal the correct combined refractive index necessary to focus the lens microstructures on the pre-interlaced images. The necessary “critical” alignment is as set forth in the attached figures, so that the interlaced printed image and the lens structures coincide properly and align along their elongate axes as shown. This process can be done inline with the printing in a web or roll format or offline later after the roll is printed. Again, the adhesive is preferably clear and the thickness of the adhesive and its refractive index is known so that the total of the polymers (or substrate layers of a finished product) has a desired refractive index to focus to the interlaced images underneath the combined layers or substrates (e.g., underneath the lens microstructures in the lens array, an adhesive layer, any primer layers, and any other material thicknesses between the lens' surfaces and the interlaced image slices).
The combination of the lens array with the interlaced image may also be done in sheet form, such as with the printed sheet or cardboard in an interlaced form and then post laminated with a pre-embossed (and many times pre-adhesive) coated substrate or film roll containing the lens microstructures for displaying the interlaced images. Again, the alignment in the proper direction is important. The display assembly fabrication can be done with a Bellhofer, D and K Laminator, GBC laminator or other types of laminators that apply film through hot melt (EVA type, extruded, and activated between 180° F. and 350° F.) or solvent-based pressure sensitive, urethane, or water based adhesive. Again, line up or Y-axis registering is important to achieve desired results. Normally, in a sheet fed environment for packaging, the sheets of paper or plastic would be printed with an interlaced image. Then, the roll of pre-embossed film (or roll of lens array material) would be attached through whatever adhesive process is being used such as heat, pressure, or a combination of both.
Much as described above, UV, E-beam, water-based embossed, and other post-print coatings may be applied directly to the printed substrates. For example, these coatings that provide the lens array may be applied via application roller in the appropriate and pre-engineered thickness for the correct combination of refractive indexes to form the lens microstructures on top of or adjacent to the printed interlaced image on the substrate (e.g., plastic, paper, or other material substrates or layers). The coatings may be embossed over the interlaced printing by way of an engraved cylinder, flat die, or other method using pressure or heat and pressure thereby forming the coating into a lens array of many lens sets or lens microstructures. The coating may also be partially cured before embossing, uncured in liquid state, or partially cured and post-cured later by means of E-beam, UV, or any other method including solvent or water evacuation. This embossing may be in the form of a roll or sheet and will be accurately post embossed.
In some embodiments, it is desirable to use printing offset, digital printing, screen printing, or other printing onto a sheet fed film or web and then to apply a lens array. For example, a film may be embossed to contain the lens array (e.g., a plurality of lens sets or lens microstructures) and then be laminated to the pre-printed substrate inline or in an offline process. The interlaced image is printed so that the files match the lens array configuration and its lens sets exactly or within tight tolerances, with such alignment generally being required to be excellent as with any lens system to achieve desirable results. The film upon which the lens array is embossed can have an EVA adhesive upon the non-lens or planar side and be applied with a Bellhofer, D and K or other thermal laminator at about 150 feet per minute over the substrate. This is particularly advantageous for printing cartons and thicker boxes. The substrate, e.g., cardboard or board of some type such as SBS and boards of 10 mils to over 40 mils, can be printed with the interlaced image on a traditional sheet fed system such as a Heidelberg, Komori, Roland, KBA, and the like. The interlaced image can be relatively coarse (such as 20 to 60 LPI), and the microstructures applied can be embossed on the film, which will total up to about 2 to about 10 mils or more in thickness. The lens array (e.g., the embossed film combined with any adhesive/primer) function similarly to and provides the quality that a conventional lenticular lens array over 80 mils thick would provide. Obviously, not only is it impractical to use a lens over 80 mils, it is also cost prohibitive for most applications. In contrast, the embossed film of the present invention costs very little to produce and packaging an item or product with that lens array (e.g., wrap or the like) will have a dramatic effect (e.g., in some embodiments over 40 views of animation are provided with only a few mils of lens array material).
Any and all of the methods described herein can be re-produced using a combination substrate with the same results and methods of manufacture. In these embodiments, the substrate or film itself can be made in several different ways. The base films may be a combination of APET, PETG, and/or combinations of film such as PET and other softer films. In many cases, the top line or layer of film is a softer film like polyethylene combined with a tougher substrate such as a polypropylene. In these combination substrates used for forming lens arrays, the base film can provide stability while the top film can be softer and easier to emboss with the lens sets or lens microstructures of the present invention to form a lens array including the top film and tougher substrate. An ideal combination may be a PET blase film with a softer propylene film laminated with a solvent based adhesive or solvent less adhesive such as a urethane adhesive like “More Free 403” by Rohm and Haas. The top film can be laminated with a thermal film EVA adhesive as well.
As described with reference to
Although the invention has been described and illustrated with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the combination and arrangement of parts can be resorted to by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as hereinafter claimed. The above discussion provides examples of lens sets with linear or elongated lenses. However, in some embodiments, the teaching of the lens microstructure or lens sets each configured to provide focusing on one or more interlaces (i.e., a subset) of a segment set can be applied to produce non-linear lens sets. For example, the lens sets may be alternative shapes with round (concentric lenses extending out from a round center lens or “bugs eye” arrangements of round or other-shaped lenses), square, and diamond shaped structures being just a small portion of the possibilities to extend the teaching of lens sets described herein.
The above description mainly provides a description of lens arrays formed from numerous lens microstructures in which an odd number of lenses are provided with a center sublenticule or lens and two mirror image side sets of lenses. While this is a preferred configuration for many applications, the center lens or sublenticule need not have exactly zero degrees of deviation for the rays and lens sets may also have an even number of sublenticules or lenses. For example, the sublenticule immediately to the left of the center of the lens set is in some embodiments of the invention, designed to deviate the interlace rays −1 degree and the sub lenticule immediately to the right of the center of the lens set could be designed to deviate the rays +1 degree. The second lenticule left of the center of the lens set could have a deviation design of −3 degrees and so on. A comparison of angular steps or deviations of two lens sets of the invention, one with a center lenticule designed for zero degrees as in many examples of the present description, with a similar design with no center lens or sublenticule, is given as follows: −8, −6, −4, −2, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 for one embodiment and −7, −5, −3, −1, 1, 3, 5, 7. Each of these lens set designs has 2 degrees of deviation from sublenticule to sublenticule and would likely function similarly (e.g., be hard to distinguish from one another in use in displaying an interlaced image). The concepts described above for odd numbered lens sets can easily be extended to such even numbered lens sets, and these “non-zero” designs are considered within the breadth of the current description. Further, the above examples of lens sets typically call for a lens set to provide a centered viewing angle from a center lens or center line of a lens set. However, alternative embodiments may use “biased” lens sets in which the angular distribution is not centered. For example, applications might need or be more effective with a bias to the angular design such as a lens set with an even number of lens with an off-center zero deviation of light rays (e.g., a 6-sublenticule lens set may be arranged with deviations of −8, −6 −4, −2, 0, 2 degrees with many other examples being apparent to those skilled in the art), which may be useful in a package or product that might viewed from the side.
In other embodiments of image display assemblies such assemblies 100, 150 that are used, for example in products such as packages, books, bottles, and the like 200-500, it may be useful to utilize other lens sets or microstructures in the lens arrays to achieve a desired imaging result. For example, the microstructures shown in
With these concepts and goals in mind, the inventors determined that it may be useful in some embodiments of lens arrays to have the lens set or microstructure be formed from one or more dual lens structures. Each of these dual lens structures is formed of two lenses or sublenticules that are configured (such as by utilizing the techniques described above with reference to the lenses of
Referring first to
In some preferred embodiments, the direction angles of the two lenses 1310, 1320 have substantially equivalent absolute values such as the positive and negative 15 degrees, positive and negative 20 degrees, positive and negative 30 degrees, and the like. In other embodiments, the lenses 1310, 1320 may have direction angles that are opposite in direction relative a to a plane passing between the lenses 1310, 1320, e.g., are positive and negative, respectively, but that differ in absolute value such as one being positive 15 degrees while the other is negative 25 degrees. Further, in some display assemblies 1300, the lens microstructures or lens sets are formed by including 1 to 10 or more dual lens structures 1305 with each being substantially identical, but, in other assemblies 1300, the dual lens structures 1305 will vary in configuration as will be described with reference to
In the lens display assembly 1400 of
Typically, each of the lenses of the dual lens structures 1305, 1405 will be of the same width and have the same thickness (e.g., be about the same size as measured by cross sectional area) to ease manufacturing and to achieve a useful imaging result, but this is not a limiting requirement as some dual lens structures may have lenses with differing widths and/or thicknesses to practice the invention. Similarly, the thickness of the dual lens structures, TDual Lens may be held constant throughout a lens set or microstructure (such as through the use of sidewalls or edges as discussed above or other manufacturing techniques) or this may be varied somewhat to practice the invention such as by having a smaller thickness for interior or central dual lens structures and a larger thickness for exterior or edge dial lens structures (as is shown in the microstructures of
The microstructure 1530, in the illustrated example, includes four dual lens structures 1502, 1504, 1506, 1508 to provide viewing of the 8 image elements 1552, 1554, 1556, 1558, 1560, 1562, 1564, 1566. In this, regard each dual lens structure includes a pair of first/left and second/right lenses or sublenticules (i.e., lenses 1510, 1512, 1516, 1518, 1520, 1522, 1526, 1528) that are paired with a single one of these image elements that is positioned under or adjacent the corresponding, paired lens as shown in
As discussed earlier, the magnitude of the absolute value of the direction angles are typically substantially equivalent for the lenses within a dual lens structure (e.g., the first lens 1510 may be configured to have a direction angle of +28 degrees while the second lens 1512 is configured with a direction angle of −28 degrees). The direction angles provided in each of the dual lens structures 1502, 1504, 1506, 1508 may be substantially equal such as when only two image elements are included in the image set under the microstructure 1530 and they are repeated four times (i.e., viewed through each of the dual liens structures). More typically, different absolute values for the direction angles will be used at least for some of the lens structures to allow 3, 4, or more image slices or elements to be viewed through the lenses of the dual structures (i.e., a different direction or viewing angle is used for each image slice or element that is to be viewed with each of these image slices or elements being unique in some embodiments or at least some being provided two or more times to increase brightness of the that image element or slice as discussed further below). As shown, the two outer or exterior dual lens structures 1502 and 1508 are shown to be thicker than the interior structures 1504, 1506 and have a maximum thickness equal to the thickness, TLens Array, of the array 1540. This is not a requirement, though, as each structure may be of equal thickness.
Also, as shown, the exterior structures 1502, 1508 are substantially equivalent in cross sectional shape as are the interior structures 1504, 1506. This provides the exterior structures 1502, 1508 with lenses having equivalent slopes and direction angles, and, similarly, the interior structures 1504, 1506 with lenses having equivalent slopes and direction angles. For example, the curvature of the lenses 1510, 1512, 1526, 1528 may be selected to achieve direction angles having absolute values that have equal absolute values (e.g., values selected to be less than about 60 degrees and more typically less than about 45 degrees) such as 15 to 30 degrees or the like with the left or first lenses 1510, 1526 being positive and the right or second lenses 1512, 1528 being negative. In this example, the curvature of the lenses 1516, 1518, 1520, 1522 may be selected to achieve direction angles having absolute values that have equal absolute values less than those of the exterior structures 1502, 1508 such as 15 to 30 degrees or the like with the left or first lenses 1516, 1520 being positive and the right or second lenses 1518, 1522 being negative.
At this point in the description, it may be useful to discuss the ray tracing for the image display assembly 1500 and for microstructure 1530 shown in
As shown, each “side” of each dual lens structure has an independent focus to the interlaced image 1550 and to a paired subset of the image (such as one or more image elements). In the microstructure 1530 there is no center lens, which may be useful in some cases such that rays are generally not directed straight up from the assembly 1500 and are better separated from side to side to limit mixing or interference. As discussed above, the image that is viewed may further be enhanced by limiting mixing and enhancing brightness by carefully pairing the image elements of the interlaced image 1550 with the lenses of the microstructure 1530. For example, lenses with similar viewing or direction angles may be used to display the same image element by repeating the image element within the set of images under the microstructure 1530. \
In the illustrated example of
As with apparatus 1500, the display apparatus 1700 may use a unique pattern within the interlaced image 1750 such that like images are paired with lenses with like direction or viewing angles. For example, image elements or interlaces 1752 and 1764 may be the same image slices (or “duplicate” interlaces or image elements) as may be interlaces 1754 and 1766, interlaces 1756 and 1760, and 1758 and 1762. In this manner, the interlaces may be numbered as images 1, 2, 3, and 4 and if it is desired that they be viewable in this order, the pattern in the interlaced image 1750 (or set of images under the microstructure 1730) may be 1, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, and 4. Again, it should be noted that the number of dual lens structures may be modified to practice the invention as may be their placement in the microstructure (e.g., do not have to have the larger sloped lenses at the exterior or edge points or have the inner and outer lenses having the same slope as it may useful to alternate larger and smaller sloped dual lens structures).
In some configurations of the microstructures formed with dual lens structures, there may be some overlap of images that may decrease the contrast of the effects of motion, 3D imagery, flips, and other desired effects. To examine possible overlap and/or mixing of rays, a brightness plot may be used to examine the effectiveness of a particular microstructure. In a typical brightness plot (such as that may be generated with computer programs), rays from each image passing though a microstructure are summed up in an angular distribution. A figure of merit may also be calculated that takes into account the percentage of rays that are mixed at the various image distribution angles, with a lower figure of merit number representing less mixing. When a brightness plot was run for the display assembly 1500 of
As will be appreciated, the manufacturing techniques described relative to the lens sets of
As noted above, the use of lens sets and microstructures enables excellent visual displays to be generated from interlaced images with much thinner and overall, smaller lens structures. This is also true for lens arrays formed using dual lens structures. For example, the lens sets 1530, 1730 may be formed with a width or pitch, PLens Set, that is similar to prior lenticules such as in the range of a few mils up to 20 mils or more. In one preferred embodiment, the pitch, PLens Set, is less than 10 mils (e.g., between 7 and 8 mils with 7.2 mil pitch used in one embodiment). This results in a sublenticule or lens pitch of less than a mil (e.g., 7 to 8 mils divided by the number of lenses in the lens set such as the 8 sublenticules shown) such as about 0.9 mils in one embodiment.
The lens array thickness, TLens Array, is significantly less than been achievable with conventional lenticular material. It is expected that the lens array thickness may be provided at thicknesses to suit a particular application with some having thicknesses in the 10 to 30 mils range while many others would be provided at thicknesses (or in thin product ranges) of less than 10 mils. For example, useful embodiments of the lens arrays 1540, 1740 may have lens array thickness, TLens Array, of less than 5 mils with one modeled array being about 2 mils thick. In the above example of a sublenticule pitch of about 0.9 mils, the ratio of thickness to pitch is about 2.2 (i.e., 2 mils divided by 0.9 mils), which likely will provide useful refraction and avoid issues of total internal reflection that may occur at lower lens to pitch ratios. Again, the lens of the lens set may all be about the same thickness such as a thickness in the range of about 2 to 5 mils or other useful thickness range or, in other cases, the thickness may increase from a first thickness for the interior dual lens structures and increase somewhat for each successive dual lens structure to facilitates fabrication without the use of sidewall or edges. With reference to lens array 1530, for example, the lens array thickness, TLens Array, may be 2 mils with each dual lens structure 1502, 1504, 1506, 1508 (and each lens in these structures) being held to less than about 2 mils thickness. In another example, though, the interior dual lens structures 1504, 1506 may have first thicknesses of about 2 mils (or some other first or smaller thickness) while the exterior dual lens structures 1502, 1508 have second thicknesses that are somewhat greater than the first thicknesses such as 2.1 to 2.5 mils or more in this example. The thickness of the dual lens structure (and lens array) being typically measured from the peak of the lens structure (where the two or dual lens meet) to the opposite surface of the array (such as surface 1542 of lens array 1530).
As discussed with reference to dual lens structures and their use in microstructures of the invention, it may be useful to provide flip imagery in which only two images are provided underneath the microstructure, and a viewer can rotate the lens array to “flip” between the two images. In these embodiments, each of the dual lens structures may be configured identically or substantially identically with first and second lenses that have direction or viewing angles of similar magnitude but opposite sign or direction. For example, a microstructure may have one, two, three, four, or more dual lens structures that are configured similarly and have the same pair of interlaces or image elements positioned adjacent them in the interlaced image layer. In one embodiment, this may involve each of the left lenses having a negative slope to provide a positive direction angle while each of the right lenses has a positive slope to provide a negative direction angle, which creates a flip between the paired image elements underneath the microstructure. For example, the angle magnitudes may be 15 to 30 degrees or other useful viewing angles, and in a three dual lens structure embodiment, this may result in viewing angles of +30 degrees, −30 degrees, +30 degrees, −30 degrees, +30 degrees, and −30 degrees when a cross section of a microstructure is viewed from left to right. However, in other embodiments, the dual structures may be more like that shown in
In other embodiments of the invention, it may be useful to construct lens sets or microstructures for lens arrays that are configured similarly to the lens array 610 of
To this end, the first lens structure 1912 is formed from one or more lenses or sublenticules that each provide the same or substantially the same viewing angle such as −5 to −60 degrees with direction angles of −20 to −30 degrees being useful in some applications. The second lens structure 1916 is formed from one or more lenses or sublenticules that each provide the same or substantially the same viewing angle that is similar or identical in magnitude as that provided by the first lens structure 1912 but opposite in sign or direction such as +5 to +60 degrees with direction angles of +15 to +30 degrees being useful in some applications.
In the illustrated example, the left or first lens structure 1912 is formed from four lenses or sublenticules 1920, 1922, 1924, 1926 with surfaces 1921 curved to provide substantially the same negative direction angle, (e.g., −15 to −35 degrees or the like with one embodiment using −20 degrees for the first or left viewing angle of the microstructure). Sidewalls or edges 1925 are included, as discussed previously, to assist in fabrication and maintaining a substantially uniform lens array thickness, TLens Array. The right or second lens structure 1916 is formed from four lenses or sublenticules 1930, 1932, 1934, 1936 with surfaces 1931 curved or shaped to provide substantially the same positive direction angle (e.g., +15 to +35 degrees or the like with one embodiment using +20 degrees for the second or right viewing angle), which is preferably about the same magnitude but opposite sign or direction as the first or left viewing angle. A lens array 1940 is created in the assembly 1900 by repeating the microstructure 1910 across a surface as discussed relative to
The interlaced image layer 1950 includes a plurality of image elements (i.e., the interlaced image), with the image elements 1954 being identical or repeating the same image element or slice of the larger image provided in the layer 1950 and the image elements 1958 being identical or repeating. However, image elements 1954 and 1958 differ and when the assembly 1900 is rotated or moved between the viewing direction provided by the first or left lens structure 1912 and the viewing direction or angle provided by the second or right lens structure 1916 the displayed image “flips” from interlaces 1954 to interlaces 1958. The number of lenses included in each lens structure 1912, 1916 may be varied to practice the invention as may be their slope and corresponding viewing or direction angle. Likewise, the slope of the left and right lens structures may be reversed so as to provide a left viewing direction or angle that is positive and a right viewing direction or angle that is negative. The repeating of the images (e.g., four times as shown) decreases the burden associated with printing high resolution interlace patterns associated with conventional thin and fine pitch lenticular material. For example, the complexity or burden may be thought of as being reduced to one fourth by the illustrated implementation. Plots of brightness values has shown that brightness levels are enhanced by the repeating techniques used and has provided improved figures of merit relative to interlaced images in which interlaces or image elements are not repeated.
In some cases, it may be useful to not place a restraint of uniform lens or sublenticule thickness on the lens sets or lens microstructures of a lens array.
The lenses 2030, 2032, 2034, 2036 have curved surfaces with positive slopes to provide matching direction angles for distribution of rays from the image elements 2058 such as an angle selected from the range, of +5 to +60 degrees and with some embodiments using an angle of +15 to +35 degrees. Although not required to practice the invention, the direction or viewing angles provided by the two lens structures 2012 and 2016 are typically similar or even identical in magnitude but opposite in sign or direction. For example, the angles may be about −15 degrees and about +15 degrees, about −25 degrees and about +25 degrees, and so on to achieve a desired flip when the lens array 2040 is rotated or a viewer's position is changed. The thickness of the lenses increases in a stepwise manner from the inner lenses 2026, 2030 to the exterior or outer lenses 2020, 2036 to allow the next outer lens to build up from the previous, adjacent inner lens. In this manner, the side edges are not needed to fabricate the microstructure 2010, which simplified fabrication for forming tools, but the thickness of lens array, TLens Array, may be greater than that which is achievable with uniform thickness embodiments.
In some cases, the flip-type lens microstructure may include more or fewer lenses or sublenticules in each side or first and second lens structures. The microstructures 1900 and 2000 are both shown with 4 sublenticules or lenses in the first and second lens structures 1912, 2012 and 1916, 2016, respectively. In other embodiments, the lens structures may have 1 to 3 lenses or sublenticules while in other cases the lens structures may have more than 4 lenses or sublenticules. For example,
The lenses of each lens structure 2112, 2116 include surfaces 2141, 2145 shaped to provide an identical or at least similar viewing direction or angle (e.g., within an acceptable tolerance range such as within 1 to 5 degrees or the like). The interlaced image of layer 2150 is designed or arranged such that 9 like images 2054 are paired with the lenses 2120-2128 of the left or first lens structures and 9 like images 2058 (but different than images 2054) are paired with the lenses 2130-2138. Such that the assembly 2100 acts to “flip” the produced display or imagery between the two images 2054, 2058 when the observer moves or the assembly 2100 is rotated or moved. Again, the thickness, TLens Array, of the lens array 2140 would be significantly less than achievable for a conventional lenticule that is replaced by the lens microstructure 2110 and would likely be in the ranges provided for other lens arrays of described above. For example, the thickness, TLens Array, may be less than about 20 mils, more preferably less than about 15 mils, and even more typically less than about 5 mils with one embodiment using a uniform thickness of about 1 mils of lens material. The thickness, TLens Array, may be held substantially constant as shown by including sidewalls or edges 2142, 2144 between adjacent pairs of sublenticules in the lens structures 2112, 2116. However, in other cases, the sidewalls are not provided and the lens array thickness may vary between the sublenticules such as shown in
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/558,523 filed Nov. 10, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11558523 | Nov 2006 | US |
| Child | 11838045 | US |
