Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a mattress support for being interposed between an underlying box spring and overlying mattress, and more specifically to a portable under mattress support uniquely constructed to incorporate spaced-apart resilient slats interconnected by strips, for use to restore the support integrity to one or more sagging or otherwise softer well-used areas of a mattress.
Description of Related Art
Over periods of extended use, conventional mattresses tend to develop areas of sag that may develop a concave center or side area, or become too soft, greatly reducing body support and sleeping comfort. In some cases, the degree of sagging is so great that a new mattress must be purchased. In other cases, while the mattress may not be considered unusable it is uncomfortable and often leads to body aches due to lack of adequate support of the body in a preferred sleeping posture. It would be desirable to have a device that could extend the useful life and support of such a mattress, since discarding such a used mattress and purchasing a replacement mattress is often very costly. However, a crucial feature of such an under mattress support is that it adequately resolves such sagging and soft areas of the mattress without simultaneously creating a stiffer less comfortable overall mattress feel to an individual lying on the mattress.
Solutions to this issue have been attempted. However, conventional solutions have proven unsatisfactory for a variety of reasons. One attempted solution involves inserting rigid sheets, or panels, of plywood, or hard and rigid slats constructed from plastic, fiberglass, metal, wood and the like, between the box spring and the overlying mattress. Again, it has been well established that such use of rigid support structures, whether in the form of panels, slats and the like, creates an unnaturally stiff or rigid mattress feel that is uncomfortable to rest or sleep on, which is a significant drawback associated with these common approaches to the problem, and any related approaches that introduce rigid under mattress support structures. A slight variation of this approach is an individually adjustable bottom for beds, which includes the use of a pad having pockets for receiving rigid steel or fiberglass rods or stays. Again, this type of device suffers from the same disadvantages; that is, an overly rigid uncomfortable mattress support.
Another commercially available type of apparatus apparently designed to address the same problem incorporates the use of a multiple chamber air support system to provide lift to a sagging mattress. This approach has resulted in very limited support by individual air-filled chambers, which has proven to be inadequate for lifting and restoring a sagging mattress to a comfortable disposition. That is, these air chambers tend to displace, or shift the air from beneath the individual, due to the force applied by the body, to a location alongside the individual, while also creating an undesirable hardened bulge and requiring ongoing maintenance. Still other existing devices utilize flat, plastic interlocking pieces. Some devices include foldable cardboard pieces, and some devices sit atop a mattress and are made of steel rods or other hard and rigid materials, which do not provide a comfortable support for at least the foregoing reasons.
Other approaches have attempted to provide a less rigid under mattress structure intended to be inserted between a box spring and mattress immediately prior to initial use of the bed, in lieu of more rigid sheets and slats, for the purpose of providing the firm support of, for example, a plywood sheet, yet with controlled yieldability in order to give the desired degree of firmness for supporting a reclining body. However, such bed board structures (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 2,847,685 to Freedlander) are not designed in a manner that successfully resolves existing areas of mattress sag or soft spots. Instead, they are constructed in the form of a unitary, or one-piece, uniformly thick contiguous panel, rather than a series of spaced-apart slats. As such, they do not enable displacement of the overlying mattress surface to restore the original configuration and to uplift a sagging mattress, especially where the mattress has a central or side concave area caused by extended use. This is a result of the lack of any structural features of the contiguous panel to enable expansion or contraction of the panel laterally or longitudinally. Some known structures incorporate individual spaced-apart slats; however, they incorporate a rigid ribbed construction. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,908,887 to Shaw, Jr. incorporates a flat rigid core sandwiched between a lightweight and insulating cushion material. As clearly stated in '887 patent, the rigid cores in the ribs are necessary to prevent an overlying mat from bending except at the flexible material hinge adjoining the ribs. Such a structure, which is specifically designed to rest upon a hard ground surface for supporting an individual, requires a rigid layer sandwiched between the outer cushioned layers due to its intended application, rendering it completely ineffective and useless as an under mattress support for the present application. Likewise, U.S. Pat. No. 2,638,606 to Austin relates to a relatively complex and cumbersome bed bottom incorporating a slatted mattress support. However, the support incorporates numerous features that render it useless for the intended purpose of the present under mattress support, including the incorporation of rigid slats running longitudinally (i.e., from the top end to the bottom end of the bed). As clearly stated in the '606 patent, the slats must be constructed of wood, steel, rattan, plastic, aluminum or some other rigid material in order to provide a relatively level base for the overlying mattress without permitting enough sag in the longitudinal direction to throw the occupant's back out of line.
Other approaches have focused on integrating complex and cumbersome multiple component systems into the original bed design aimed at, among other things, preventing material deformation and fatigue of a supported mattress. However, significantly, they are not portable under mattress supports. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,644,596 to Husler is directed to a cumbersome multi-component assembly comprising a permanent structural support, primarily constructed from a variety of complex individual interacting rigid structural elements, for an overlying mattress, and therefore used in lieu of a conventional box spring. Accordingly, such structures do not function as a portable under mattress support, since they are an integral subassembly of a larger overall mattress support structure.
Other structures are known that incorporate individual spaced-apart interconnected panels of resilient material for entirely unrelated applications. However, as a result of their different intended usages they lack significant features, rendering them inadequate and wholly ineffective for application as an under mattress support. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,066,001 to Wilkinson teaches a portable, foldable, adjustable aerobic bench/step/mat including individual panels secured by flexible hinges. However, due to the requirement that the structure be adapted to be converted between a flat exercise mat, a bench and an aerobic step, the design of the hinges, the spacing that the hinges create between adjacent panels, and the relative gap created by the hinges vis-Ă -vis the size of the adjoined panels must be such that they enable adjacent panels to be precisely stacked upon one another to increase the height for converting the apparatus from a flat mat to a stacked step or bench. As a result, the required structure hinders the ability to roll up the panels into a rolled form for packaging, storage and the like. Furthermore, the structure of the hinges is specifically designed to prevent displacement of adjacent hinges with respect to one another and, therefore, prevent freedom of movement of adjoined panels with respect to one another. Therefore, the '001 patent and similar structures specifically prevent displacement of adjacent panels (i.e., preventing any degree of freedom to move toward or away from one another) which is a crucial feature of the under mattress support of the present invention.
Significantly, the problem being addressed herein is not one of providing an orthopedic or other medical-related solution for people with extreme back issues by over-supporting or hardening the mattress surface. To the contrary, the invention described herein is specifically designed, configured and adapted to enhance existing softer and sagging regions of a well-used mattress so that the mattress continues to provide comfort and support for typical individuals while sleeping, and at the same time extends the useful life of the current mattress by restoring the mattress to its original shape and comfort.
With the use of the under mattress support described herein, the use and wear of any mattress can be extended to continue to provide comfort and support for one or more individuals while sleeping, and reducing the expense associated with purchasing a replacement mattress due to sagging or concave pockets and deformities due to extended use. The under mattress support described herein is positioned under a mattress and on top of its accompanying box spring or similar mattress support. That is, the under mattress is positioned interposed between the box spring and mattress. Furthermore, the under mattress support of the present invention is constructed to provide the flexibility to either stack the slat (or encased slat) portions or to roll up the apparatus to facilitate packaging options for sale and storage.
Various implementations of an under mattress support are provided for extending the use of a sagging mattress, the under mattress support functions to raise the height of a sagging or soft area or region of a mattress to restore it to its original configuration.
In one general implementation, an under mattress support is provided for positioning between a box spring support and a sagging area of an overlying mattress, the box spring support and overlying mattress having corresponding sides extending longitudinally between upper and lower ends of the respective box spring and mattress ends. The under mattress support includes: (a) a series of parallel spaced-apart laterally extending elongated resilient unitary slats, each slat having a predetermined width and height and a predetermined slat length adequate to extend laterally from a portion of one of the sides of the mattress to a portion of the opposite side of the mattress; (b) a unitary bottom pliable fabric cover disposed beneath the slats such that the bottom pliable fabric cover extends completely beneath all of the slats; and (c) a top pliable fabric cover disposed above the slats such that the top pliable fabric cover extends completely above all of said slats, the top pliable fabric cover selectively fixedly attached to said bottom pliable fabric cover in a manner resulting in the permanent encasement of each of said resilient slats within a corresponding unique slat enclosure such that each individual encased slat has a contiguous exterior surface completely surrounded by, and directly adjacent to, a corresponding contiguous interior surface of the corresponding unique slat enclosure. In this manner, each unitary resilient slat is completely permanently encased within a corresponding unique enclosure rendering the slat inaccessible. Preferably, the selective attachment further includes first and second laterally-extending linear cover attachment portions each permanently affixing the top and bottom fabric covers to one another along the length of the respective attachment portion, the cover attachment portions disposed in a predetermined desired spaced-apart relationship to one another within an area between adjacently positioned first and second enclosed slats having opposing corresponding first and second slat lateral sides, a first one of the attachment portions running adjacent to the first slat lateral side, and a second one of the attachment portions running adjacent to the second slat lateral side to form a pliable fabric strip having a strip width of at least approximately one inch and having a fabric strip length equal to a corresponding length of each slat enclosure as measured from the opposite edges of adjoined top and bottom pliable fabric covers enclosing opposite ends of each resilient slat, such that opposite ends of each pliable fabric strip extend laterally for a length directly corresponding to opposite edges of the adjoined top and bottom pliable fabric covers enclosing the slat ends. In this manner, an under mattress support periphery is created that is defined by linear edges, wherein the formed pliable fabric strips enable and facilitate lateral compression of the under mattress support when the under mattress support is in use supporting the mattress, each of the formed pliable fabric strips having adequate resiliency to enable selective rolling of the under mattress support longitudinally along the respective lengths of the pliable fabric strips to enable the under mattress support to be easily rolled up into a compact configuration, thereby facilitating compact packaging of the under mattress support prior to initial use, and subsequent compact storage of the under mattress support when not in use.
In a further aspect, each pliable fabric strip separating each pair of adjacent enclosed resilient slats has a strip width adequate to maintain a minimum spacing between the adjacent enclosed slats within a range of approximately 2 inches to 5 inches.
In a further implementation, the top pliable fabric cover may be selectively permanently attached to the bottom pliable fabric cover by either stitching or chemical adhesive.
In a further aspect, the top pliable fabric cover may be selectively permanently attached to the bottom pliable fabric cover along each lateral side of each resilient slat, forming an enclosure of the top pliable fabric cover and the bottom pliable fabric cover completely around each resilient slat.
In a further aspect, each of the plurality of pliable fabric strips may extend laterally from the attachment of the top pliable fabric cover to the bottom pliable fabric cover along each lateral side of each resilient slat such that each pair of adjacent resilient slats are parallel to one another and spaced apart from one another a predetermined distance to allow lateral compression of each resilient slat when the mattress support is properly placed interposed between the mattress and the box spring during use.
In a further aspect, each slat may be comprised of a rectangular polyhedron slat having a height within a range of 1 inch to 4 inches and a width within a range of 2 inches to 5 inches.
In a further aspect, each polyhedron slat may be constructed of resilient material having a foam density within a range of 1.5 to 1.8 pounds per cubic foot.
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to a first exemplary implementation of
Referring now primarily to the implementation depicted in
Referring particularly to
Referring now particularly to
Due to the flexibility of the fabric bottom cover 14 shown in
The orientation of the slats 12 is such that the length of the slats 12 extends across a portion of the mattress from side to side, or laterally. Thus, the under mattress support size will be determined by the length of the slats 12 which will also be determined by the size of the bed and mattress to be supported.
Tying or sewing each slat 12 to its adjacent slat 12 with strong cords 18, 22 at opposite ends and cords 26, 28 at the opposite sides of the under mattress support 10 provide a strong but non-complex method of securing the array of slats together in a parallel array and simultaneously providing a non-complex solution to attaching the bottom cover 14 to the top cover 16. It is possible in an alternate implementation that the bottom cover 14 shown in
Referring now primarily to
The quantity of resilient slats 44 can be varied depending upon the area of the mattress being supported. The length of the slats 44 and the device can be any desired length, again depending upon the area of the mattress to be supported.
Referring now to
Referring now briefly to
Referring now briefly to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now specifically to the structure of the resilient slats depicted and described herein, preferably have compression strength, measured longitudinally, that will be sufficient to eliminate sagging areas or concave areas in a well-used or soft mattress without making the supported mattress uncomfortable. In an exemplary implementation, heavy duty polyurethane foam slats may have a foam density within a range of 1.5 to 1.8 Pounds per Cubic Foot (PCF), and the heavy duty polyurethane foam slats may have a firmness of approximately 35 ILD (Indentation Load Deflection—where the ILD number is measured as the pounds of pressure to compress the foam 25 percent). Other foam densities and firmness values can be utilized. The foam slats have some give and resiliency so that they do not act like rigid boards or rigid plastic that would otherwise make the supported mattress uncomfortable. In one exemplary implementation, each of the resilient foam slats would have a width within a range of 2 inches to 5 inches, and a height of 1 inch to 4 inches, with the length determined by the mattress size. The polyurethane foam is selected to have a desirable compression force with some resiliency and durability for extended daily use. When using commercial polyurethane foam, the foam should preferably be heavy duty polyurethane foam.
In a preferred embodiment of the various implementations, the heavy duty polyurethane is described generally as a rectangular polyhedron. However, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, it is feasible that the slats could take on any of a myriad of alternate geometries including, for example, hexagonal polyhedrons (as shown in some of the drawings figures) as well as non-polyhedrons (such as elliptical geometries), as long as the selected geometry provides the support characteristics desired.
Resilient slats made of resilient material can be varied in dimensions including width and thickness. The spacing between the parallel slats on their lateral sides can also be varied as long as there is sufficient space to adequately allow the slats to compress laterally during support of the mattress.
The under mattress support disclosed herein is utilized by inserting the mattress support between the box spring and the sagging area of the mattress to be supported. The lengths of the slats may be selected to extend from a portion of one side of the mattress to a portion of the other side of the mattress.
The utilization of the under mattress support described herein can greatly prolong the life of a desirable but sagging or soft mattress, and can restore the mattress to its original shape and comfort, which the prior art does not accomplish.
The length and width of the under mattress support described herein can be varied dependent upon the size of the mattress and box spring with which the under mattress support is being used. The instant invention has been shown and described herein in what is considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations or embodiments. It is recognized, however, that departures may be made therefrom within the scope of the invention and that obvious modifications will occur to a person skilled in the art.
This U.S. non-provisional utility patent application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. non-provisional utility patent application Ser. No. 14/170,776 filed on Feb. 3, 2014, which, in turn, is a continuation-in-part of U.S. non-provisional utility patent application Ser. No. 13/758,045 (now abandoned) filed on Feb. 4, 2013, all of which are incorporated-by-reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2616100 | Weiner | Nov 1952 | A |
2638606 | Austin | May 1953 | A |
2847685 | Freedlander | Aug 1958 | A |
3280515 | Eriksson | Oct 1966 | A |
3319274 | Upton | May 1967 | A |
3370306 | Lovette | Feb 1968 | A |
3751742 | Worley | Aug 1973 | A |
4644596 | Husler | Feb 1987 | A |
4654907 | Haugaard | Apr 1987 | A |
4745645 | McWilliams | May 1988 | A |
4815155 | Sommers | Mar 1989 | A |
4908887 | Shaw, Jr. | Mar 1990 | A |
4955665 | Richer | Sep 1990 | A |
5066001 | Wilkinson | Nov 1991 | A |
5426796 | Stanton | Jun 1995 | A |
5459894 | Buonocore | Oct 1995 | A |
5669089 | Dees | Sep 1997 | A |
5950260 | Dees | Sep 1999 | A |
5970549 | Rudden | Oct 1999 | A |
6618883 | Angland | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6711762 | Olenick | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7036162 | Gatten | May 2006 | B1 |
9241578 | Franken | Jan 2016 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
580274 | Sep 1946 | GB |
2014-075789 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US16/66820 International Search Report dated Mar. 10, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170049242 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14170776 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 14970648 | US | |
Parent | 13758045 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14170776 | US |