Under water treatment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6482202
  • Patent Number
    6,482,202
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 10, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 19, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
An electrosurgical instrument, which is used for the treatment of tissue in the presence of an electrically-conductive fluid medium, comprises an instrument shaft, and an electrode assembly at one end of the shaft. The electrode assembly comprises a tissue treatment electrode and a return electrode which is electrically insulated from the tissue treatment electrode by means of an insulation member. The tissue treatment electrode has an exposed end for treating tissue, and the return electrode has a fluid contact surface which is spaced from the tissue treatment electrode in such a manner as to define, in use, a conductive fluid path that completes an electrical circuit between the tissue treatment electrode and the return electrode. The electrode assembly is provided with a plurality of apertures in the region of the tissue treatment electrode, through which apertures vapour bubbles and/or particulate material can be aspirated from the region surrounding the tissue treatment electrode.
Description




This invention relates to an electrosurgical instrument for the treatment of tissue in the presence of an electrically-conductive fluid medium, to electrosurgical apparatus including such an instrument, and to an electrode unit for use in such an instrument.




Endoscopic electrosurgery is useful for treating tissue in cavities of the body, and is normally performed in the presence of a distension medium. When the distension medium is a liquid, this is commonly referred to as underwater electrosurgery, this term denoting electrosurgery in which living tissue is treated using an electrosurgical instrument with a treatment electrode or electrodes immersed in liquid at the operation site. A gaseous medium is commonly employed when Endoscopic surgery is performed in a distensible body cavity of larger potential volume in which a liquid medium would be unsuitable, as is often the case in laparoscopic or gastroenterological surgery.




Underwater surgery is commonly performed using endoscopic techniques, in which the endoscope itself may provide a conduit (commonly referred to as a working channel) for the passage of an electrode. Alternatively, the endoscope may be specifically adapted (as in a resectoscope) to include means for mounting an electrode. or the electrode may be introduced into a body cavity via a separate access means at an angle with respect to the endoscope—a technique commonly referred to as triangulation. These variations in technique can be subdivided by surgical speciality, where one or other of the techniques has particular advantages given the access route to the specific body cavity. Endoscopes with integral working channels, or those characterised as resectoscopes are generally employed when the body cavity may be accessed through a natural body opening—such as the cervical canal to access the endometrial cavity of the uterus, or the urethra to access the prostate gland and the bladder. Endoscopes specifically designed for use in the endometrial cavity are referred to as hysteroscopes, and those designed for use in the urinary tract include cystoscopes, urethroscopes and resectoscopes. The procedures of transurethal resection or vaporisation of the prostate gland are known as TURP and EVAP respectively. When there is no natural body opening through which an endoscope may be passed, the technique of triangulation is commonly employed. Triangulation is commonly used during underwater endoscopic surgery on joint cavities such as the knee and the shoulder. The endoscope used in these procedures is commonly referred to as an arthroscope.




Electrosurgery is usually carried out using either a monopolar instrument or a bipolar instrument. With monopolar electrosurgery, an active electrode is used in the operating region, and a conductive return plate is secured to the patient's skin. With this arrangement, current passes from the active electrode through the patient's tissues to the external return plate. Since the patient represents a significant portion of the circuit, input power levels have to be high (typically 150 to 250 watts). to compensate for the resistive current limiting of the patient's tissues and, in the case of underwater electrosurgery, power losses due to the fluid medium which is rendered partially conductive by the presence of blood or other body fluids. Using high power with a monopolar arrangement is also hazardous, due to the tissue heating that occurs at the return plate. which can cause severe skin burns. There is also the risk of capacitive coupling between the instrument and patient tissues at the entry point into the body cavity.




With bipolar electrosurgery, a pair of electrodes (an active electrode and a return electrode) are used together at the tissue application site. Thus arrangement has advantages from the safety standpoint, due to the relative proximity of the two electrodes so that radio frequency currents are limited to the region between the electrodes. However, the depth of effect is directly related to the distance between the two electrodes; and, in applications requiring very small electrodes, the inter-electrode spacing becomes very small, thereby limiting tissue effect and the output power spacing the electrodes further apart would often obscure vision of the application site, and would require a modification in surgical technique to ensure direct contact of both electrodes with the tissue.




There are a number of variations to the basic design of the bipolar probe. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,706,667 describes one of the fundamentals of the design, namely that the ratio of the contact areas of the return electrode and of the active electrode is greater than 7:1 and smaller than 20:1 for cutting purposes. This range relates only to cutting electrode configurations. When a bipolar instrument is used for desiccation or coagulation, the ratio of the contact areas of the two electrodes may be reduced to approximately 1.1 to avoid differential electrical stresses occurring at the contact between the tissue and the electrode.




The electrical junction between the return electrode and tissue can be supported by wetting of the tissue by a conductive solution such as normal saline. This ensures that the surgical effect is limited to the needle or active electrode, with the electric circuit between the two electrodes beings completed by the tissue. One of the obvious limitations with the design is that the needle must be completively buried in the tissue to enable the return electrode to complete the circuit. Another problem is one of the orientation, even a relatively small change in application angle from the ideal perpendicular contact with respect to the tissue surface, will change the contact area ratio, so that a surgical effect can occur in the tissue in contact with the return electrode.




Cavity distension provides space for gaining access to the operation site, to improve visualisation and to allow for manipulation of instruments. In low volume body cavities, particularly where it is desirable to distend the cavity under higher pressure liquid rather than gas is more commonly used due to better optical characteristics, and because it washes blood away from the operative site.




Conventional underwater electrosurgery has been performed using a non-conductive liquid (such as 1.5% glycine) as an irrigant, or as a distension medium to eliminate electrical conduction losses. Glycine is used in isotonic concentrations to prevent osmotic changes in the blood when intra-vascular absorption occurs. In the course of an operation, veins may be severed, with resultant infusion of the liquid into the circulation, which could cause, among other things, a dilution of serum sodium which can lead to a condition known as water intoxication.




The applicants have found that it is possible to use a conductive liquid medium, such as normal saline, in underwater endoscopic electrosurgery in place of non-conductive, electrolyte-free solutions. Normal saline is the preferred distension medium in underwater endoscopic surgery when electrosurgery is not contemplated. or a non-electrical tissue effect such as laser treatment is being used. Although normal saline (0.9% w/v: 150 mmol/L) has an electrical conductivity somewhat greater than that of most body tissue, it has the advantage that displacement by absorption or extravasation from the operative site produces little physiological effect, and the so-called water intoxication effects of non-conductive, electrolyte-free solutions are avoided.




Carbon dioxide is the preferred gaseous distension medium, primarily because of its non-toxic nature and high water solubility.




In endoscopic procedures in which the distension medium is a gas, the applicants have found that it is possible to use an electrically-conductive gas (such as argon) in place of carbon dioxide. Argon is conductive when excited into a discharge state, and has been employed in both endoscopic and conventional monopolar electrosurgery as a method of increasing the distance between the tissue and the instrument, by providing a conductive path between the two when high voltage electrosurgical outputs such as spray or fulgurate are being used. The high voltages used in this application result in a very low penetration of the electrosurgical effect into the tissue, making the technique only suitable to control bleeding from multiple small blood vessels. This allows the surgeon to staunch bleeding from multiple sites in a surgical sites in a surgical wound using a rapid “painting” technique, rather than applying electrosurgery to each individual bleeding site. The argon gas is delivered through a hollow surgical instrument, and passes over the monopolar electrode exposed at the tip of the instrument as a stream. This produces a region at the operative site which is rich in argon, and which contributes to the distension of the body cavity. High voltage monopolar electrosurgical outputs are undesirable in endoscopic surgery, because of the risks of damaging structures outside the field of vision, by either capacitive or direct coupling to a portion of the instrument remote from the operative site often outside the field of vision of the operator.




The applicants have developed a bipolar instrument suitable for underwater electrosurgery using a conductive liquid or gaseous medium. This electrosurgical instrument for the treatment of tissue in the presence of a fluid medium comprises an instrument body having a handpiece and an instrument shaft and an electrode assembly, at one end of the shaft. The electrode assembly comprises a tissue treatment (active) electrode which is exposed at the extreme distal end of the instrument, and a return electrode which is electrically insulated from the tissue treatment electrode and has a fluid contact surface spaced proximally from the exposed part of the tissue treatment electrode. In use of the instrument, the tissue treatment electrode is applied to the tissue to be treated whilst the return electrode. being spaced proximally from the exposed part of the tissue treatment electrode, is normally spaced from the tissue and serves to complete an electrosurgical current loop from the tissue treatment electrode through the tissue and the fluid medium. This electrosurgical instrument is described in the specification of our European Patent Application 96918786.1




The electrode structure of this instrument, in combination with an electrically-conductive fluid medium, largely avoids the problems experienced with monopolar or bipolar electrosurgery. In particular, input power levels arc much lower than those generally necessary with a monopolar arrangement (typically 100 watts). Moreover, because of the relatively large spacing between its electrodes, an improved depth of effect is obtained compared with conventional bipolar arrangements.




The specification of our International Patent Application GB96/01472 describes an irritated bipolar electrosurgical instrument that can be used in open air or gas-filled environments This instrument includes an internal channel for feeding electrically-conductive fluid (typically saline) to the exposed end of a tissue treatment electrode so as to provide a conductive fluid path that completes an electrical circuit to a return electrode when the instrument is in use. This instrument also includes an internal channel for removing fluid from the region of the exposed end of the tissue treatment electrode. When the fluid is a liquid, such as saline, the presence of that liquid can cause collateral tissue damage, so its removal is desirable. This type of instrument is intended primarily for use in open air or Las-filled environments, and is not suitable for use with electrosurgical procedures which require distension of a body cavity.




However, where the volume of a body cavity is small—for example in arthroscope surgery where even the large joints, such as the knee, may only accommodate 50-60 ml of irrigation fluid—the following problems may occur, namely:




(i) Heated fluid in the immediate vicinity of the tissue contact electrode can cause collateral tissue damage;




(ii) The products of the tissue vaporized by the tissue contact electrode can cause visualisation problems; and




(iii) Soft tissue present in anoint space tends to move about, making it difficult to apply the active electrode to vaporise such tissue.




An arthroscope electrode may be characterised as short (100 to 140 mm), and rigid with a working diameter up to 5 mm. It can be introduced through a stab incision into a joint cavity (with or without a cannula) using the triangulation technique. Such an electrode is operated with a motion which moves the electrode between the 9 O'Clock and 3 O'Clock positions on the arthroscopic image As a result, the tissue to be treated is usually approached at a shallow working angle with respect to the axis of the electrode. An arthroscopic electrode thus needs to have an effect consistent with this angled approach to the tissue The tissue to be treated, such as meniscal cartilage, is commonly dense and of a high electrical impedance. An arthroscope electrode requires output power and voltage settings that reflect the type of tissue being treated, the size of electrode, and the fact that arthroscopists are seeking a speed of effect comparable to that of the mechanical shaver devices they currently employ, albeit with an electrode of smaller dimensions than a shaver blade for improved access.




The aim of the invention is to provide an Improved electrosurgical instrument of this type.




The present invention provides a electrosurgical instrument for the treatment of tissue in the presence of an electrically-conductive fluid medium, the instrument comprising an instrument shaft. and an electrode assembly at one end of the shaft, the electrode assembly comprising a tissue treatment electrode and a return electrode which is electrically insulated from the tissue treatment electrode by means of an insulation member, the tissue treatment electrode having an exposed end for treating tissue, and the return electrode having a fluid contact surface which is spaced proximally from the tissue treatment electrode in such a manner as to define, in use, a conductive fluid path that completes an electrical circuit between the tissue treatment electrode and the return electrode, wherein the electrode assembly is provided with a plurality of apertures in the region of the tissue treatment electrode and distal to the return electrode, through which apertures vapour bubbles and/or particulate material can be aspirated from the region surrounding the tissue treatment electrode.




In a preferred embodiment, the instrument further comprises a pump for subjecting the distal end portion of the instrument shaft to a sub-atmospheric pressure thereby to aspirate, in use, vapour bubbles and/or particulate material through said apertures from the region surrounding the tissue treatment electrode.




Advantageously, the pump is activated cyclically whereby matter is aspirated in a pulsed fashion. The pump may additionally or alternatively be activated only when the tissue treatment electrode is powered for tissue vaporisation.




Preferably, the instrument further comprises an RF generator having a bipolar output connected to the tissue treatment electrode and the return electrode. In this case, the pump may be controlled in dependence upon the voltage output characteristics of the RF generator. In this way, the flow of vapour bubbles and/or aspirated particulate material is balanced to the voltage output characteristics of the RF generator to prevent excessive cooling of the tissue treatment electrode and a resultant increase in the vaporisation power threshold. The return electrode is spaced from the tissue treatment electrode so that, in use, it does not contact the tissue to be treated, and so that the electrical circuit is always completed by the conductive fluid, and not simply by arcing between the electrodes. Indeed, the arrangement is such that arcing between adjacent parts of the electrode assembly is avoided, thereby ensuring that the tissue treatment electrode can become enveloped in a vapour pocket so that tissue entering the vapour pocket becomes the preferred path for current to flow back to the return electrode via the conductive fluid.




The electrosurgical instrument of the invention is useful for dissection, resection, vaporisation, desiccation and coagulation of tissue, as well as for combinations of these functions. It has a particular application in arthroscopic surgery as it pertains to endoscopic and percutaneous procedures performed on joints of the body including, but not limited to, such techniques as they apply to the spine and other non-synovial joints. Arthroscopic operative procedures may include: partial or complete meniscectomy of the knee joint including meniscal cystectomy, lateral retinacular release of the knee joint, removal of anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments or remnants thereof, labral tear resection, acromioplasty, bursectomy and subacromial decompression of the shoulder joint; anterior release of the temperomandibular joint; synovectomy, cartilage debricement, chondroplasty, division of intra-articular adhesions, fracture and tendon debricement as applied to any of the synovial joints of the body, inducing thermal shrinkage of joint capsules as a treatment for recurrent dislocation, subluxation or repetitive stress injury to any articulated joint of the body; discectomy either in the treatment of a disc prolapse or as part of a spinal fusion via a posterior or anterior approach to the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine or any other fibrous joint for similar purposes; excision of diseased tissue; and haemostasis.




The instrument of the invention is also useful for dissection, resection, vaporisation, desiccation and coagulation of tissue, as well as combinations of these functions, with particular application in urological endoscopic (urethroscopy, cystoscopy, ureteroscopy and nephroscopy) and percutaneous surgery. Urological procedures may include: electro-vaporisation of the prostate gland (EVAP) and other variants of the procedure commonly referred to as transurethal resection of the prostate (TURP) including but not limited to, interstitial ablation of the prostate gland by a percutaneous or perurethral route whether performed for benign or malignant disease; transurethal or percutaneous resection of urinary tract tumours as they may arise as primary or secondary neoplasms, and further as they may arise anywhere in the urological tract from the calyces of the kidney to the external urethral meatus; division of strictures as they may arise at the pelviureteric junction (PUJ), ureter, ureteral orifice, bladder neck or urethra; correction of ureterocoele, shrinkage of bladder diverticular, cystoplasty procedures as they pertain to corrections of voiding dysfunction; thermally induced shrinkage of the pelvic floor as a corrective treatment for bladder neck descent, excision of diseased tissue, and haemostasis.




Surgical procedures using the electrosurgical instrument of the invention may also include introducing the electrode assembly to the surgical site, whether through an artificial conduit (a cannula) or a natural conduit, which may be in an anatomical body cavity or space, or one created surgically. The cavity or space may be distended during the procedure using a fluid, or may be naturally held open by anatomical structures. The surgical site may be bathed in a continuous flow of conductive fluid such as saline solution either to fill and distend the cavity, or to create a locally-irrigated environment around the tip of the electrode assembly in a gas filled cavity. The irrigating fluid may be aspirated from the surgical site to remove products created by application of the RF energy, tissue debris or blood. The procedures may include simultaneous viewing of the site via an endoscope, or using an indirect visualisation means. An irrigated bipolar electrosurgical instrument is described in the specification of our International Patent Application GB96/01471




Advantageously, the exposed end of the tissue treatment electrode extends laterally through a cut-out provided in the insulation member at the distal end portion of the instrument, the fluid contact surface of the return electrode overlying the insulation member in the region of the cut-out.




In a preferred embodiment, a single coiled filament constitutes the tissue treatment electrode, and said apertures are formed in the insulation member, the apertures being positioned around, and adjacent to, the tissue treatment electrode. Preferably, the filament has a diameter lying within the range of from 0.05 mm to 1.0 mm.




Alternatively, an apertured plate constitutes the tissue treatment electrode, the apertures of the plate constituting the apertures through which vapour bubbles and/or particulate material can be aspirated. The outer surface of said plate may be formed with recesses adjacent to the apertures. The recesses trap vapour pockets and so reduce the vaporisation power threshold of the instrument.




The tissue treatment electrode may be made of tungsten or of an alloy of tungsten or platinum.




Preferably, the instrument further comprises a tube positioned within the instrument shaft for connecting said apertures to the pump. The tube may be a multi-lumen tube, in which case it defines a plurality of channels, the diameter of each of said channels being at least equal to the diameter of the apertures in the region of the tissue treatment electrode. Alternatively, the instrument further comprises a filter at the distal end of the tube.




The invention also provides an electrode unit for an electrosurgical instrument for the treatment of tissue in the presence of an electrical-conductive fluid medium, the electrode unit comprising a shaft having at one end means for connection to an instrument handpiece. and, mounted on the other end of the shaft. an electrode assembly comprising a tissue treatment electrode and a return electrode which is electrically insulated from the tissue treatment electrode by means of an insulation member, the tissue treatment electrode having an exposed end for treating tissue, and the return electrode having a fluid contact surface which is spaced from the tissue treatment electrode in such a manner as to define, in use, a conductive fluid path that completes an electrical circuit between the tissue treatment electrode and the return electrode, wherein the electrode assembly is provided with a plurality of apertures in the region of the tissue treatment electrode, through which apertures vapour bubbles and/or particulate material can be aspirated from the region surrounding the tissue treatment electrode.




The invention further provides electrosurgical apparatus comprising a radio frequency generator and an electrosurgical instrument for the treatment of tissue in the presence of an electrically-conductive fluid medium, the instrument comprising an instrument shaft, and an electrode assembly at one end of the shaft, the electrode assembly comprising a tissue treatment electrode and a return electrode which is electrically insulated from the tissue treatment electrode by means of an insulation member, the tissue treatment electrode having an exposed end for treating tissue, and the return electrode having a fluid contact surface which is spaced from the tissue treatment electrode in such a manner as to define, in use, a conductive fluid path that completes an electrical circuit between the tissue treatment electrode and the return electrode, and the radio frequency generator having a bipolar output connected to the electrodes, wherein the electrode assembly is provided with a plurality of apertures in the region of the tissue treatment electrode, through which apertures vapour bubbles and/or particulate material can be aspirated from the region surrounding the tissue treatment electrode.











The invention will now be described in greater detail, by way of example, with reference to the drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a diagram showing an electrosurgical apparatus constructed in accordance with the invention,





FIG. 2

is a diagrammatic side elevation of a first form of electrode unit constructed in accordance with the invention.





FIG. 3

is an enlarged view, looking in the direction of the arrow A of

FIG. 2

of part of the first form of electrode unit: and





FIGS. 4

to


6


are diagrammatic side elevations of second, third and fourth forms of electrode unit constructed in accordance with the invention.











Referring to the drawings,

FIG. 1

shows electrosurgical apparatus including a generator


1


having an output socket


2


providing a radio frequency (RF) output, via a connection cord


4


, for an instrument in the form of a handpiece


3


. Activation of the generator


1


may be performed from the handpiece


3


via a control connection (not shown) in the cord


4


, or by means of a footswitch unit


5


connected separately to the rear of the generator


1


by a footswitch connection cord


6


. In the illustrated embodiment, the footswitch unit


5


has two footswitches


5




a


and


5




b


for selecting a desiccation mode and a vaporisation mode of the generator


1


respectively. The generator front panel has push buttons


7




a


and


7




b


for respectively setting desiccation and vaporisation power levels, which are indicated in a display


8


. Push buttons


9


are provided as an alternative means for selection between the desiccation and vaporisation modes.




The handpiece


3


mounts a detachable electrode unit E, such as the electrode units E


1


to E


4


to be described below.





FIG. 2

shows the first form of electrode unit E


1


for detachable fastening to the electrosurgical instrument handpiece


3


, the electrode unit comprising a shaft


10


, which is constituted by a semi-flexible tube made of stainless steel or phynox electroplated in copper or gold. with an electrode assembly


12


at a distal end thereof At the other end (not shown) of the shaft


10


, means are provided for connecting the electrode unit E


1


to the handpiece


3


both mechanically and electrically




The RF generator


1


(not shown in

FIG. 2

) delivers an electrosurgical current to the electrode assembly


12


. The generator


1


includes means for varying the delivered output power to suit different electrosurgical requirements. The generator may be as described in the specification of our European Patent Application 96304558.8.




The electrode unit E


1


includes an active (tissue treatment) electrode


14


which is constituted by a curved fenestrated plate made of tungsten or an alloy of tungsten or platinum. The active electrode


14


is formed with a plurality of fenestrations


14




a


, and the regions


14




b


of the active electrode adjacent to the fenestrations define cup-shaped recesses (see FIG.


3


). The active electrode


14


is connected to the RF generator


1


via an insulated central copper conductor (not shown). A ceramic insulation sleeve


16


surrounds the central conductor, the active electrode


14


extending laterally therefrom through a cut-out


16




a


. A polytetrafluoroethylene, a polyolelin, a polyester or ethylene tetrafluoroethvlene) surrounds the proximal portion of the shaft adjacent to the return electrode


18


. The return electrode


18


is formed with a hood-like extension


18




a


which extends over the surface or the sleeve


16


which is opposite to the cut-out


16




a


. The electrode unit E


1


can, thus, provide maximum tissue engagement for shallow working angle applications, and is known as a side-effect electrode.




This electrosurgical instrument is particularly useful for rapid tissue debunking. One of the problems which could be encountered when tissue is rapidity debunked using an arthroscopic electrode configuration, particularly when working in small joint spaces, is the production of vapour bubbles generated as an end product of tissue vaporisation Such bubbles obscure vision, and can coaiesce at the site of tissue application, so that the electrical circuit between the active and return electrodes becomes compromised by the absence of conductive fluid. Irregular active electrodes having filamentary, mesh or coiled spring forms go some way to solving this problem, as they reduce the vaporisation threshold as disclosed in the specification of our International Patent Application GB97/00065. Another advantage of these electrode forms is that the bubbles generated by vaporisation are smaller than those formed by solid electrodes. As the brush electrode


14


of this electrosurgical instrument s of irregular shape, it also has the advantage of producing relatively small vapour bubbles as the product of tissue vaporisation. The production of vapour bubbles is, however, further reduced as a result of the lower threshold power of vaporisation which results from use of the electrode unit E


1


. This improvement results from the hood-like extension


18




a


of the return electrode


18


which extends over the back of the active electrode


14


. This reduces the separation between the active electrode


14


and the return electrode


18


, thereby reducing the electrical field and the vaporisation threshold power of the active electrode. This enhances the speed of vaporisation of the tissue at a lower power than would otherwise be required for the given active electrode area, and hence reduces the formation of vapour bubbles. As the hood-like extension


18




a


extends along the entire length of the active electrode


14


, a large active electrode size can be supported, despite the reduction in electrode separation.


18




a


extends along the entire length of the active electrode


14


, a large active electrode size can be supported, despite the reduction in electrode separation.




In order to reduce further the problems of vapour bubble production, the electrode unit E


1


is provided with a suction pump (not shown) which can remove vapour bubbles via the shaft of the instrument through the fenestrations


14




a


in the active electrode


14


. This enhances the elimination of vapour bubbles from an operation site, which is particularly advantageous during aggressive tissue debulking. The suction pump must be controlled so that the flow of bubbles through the electrode


14


is balanced to the voltage output characteristics of the RF generator


1


to prevent excessive cooling of the active electrode and a resultant increase in its vaporisation power threshold. The thermal mass of the fenestrated active electrode


14


is lower than that of a solid form active electrode, and this assists in rapidly reestablishing the vapour pocket around the active electrode should this collapse following excessive cooling. The cup-shaped recesses


14




b


in the active electrode


14


help to maintain the vapour pocket by retaining saline despite the fluid flow caused by the aspiration of the suction pump. The trapped saline absorbs energy, and so is vaporized in preference to the saline in the fluid flow caused by the aspiration.




The robustness of the electrode assembly


12


is also important In arthroscopic surgery, both because of the tendency of surgeons to use an electrode assembly as a cold manipulator, and because of the rigid nature of the tissue to be treated—particularly bone and cartilage The hood-like extension


18




a


adds mechanical strength to the electrode assembly


12


, as it extends over the ceramic insulation sleeve


16


, thereby reducing the risk of ceramic fracture and potential breakdown of insulation.




The electrode unit E


1


is intended primarily for use in arthroscopic surgery which requires rapid tissue debulking by vaporisation. In use, the electrosurgical instrument is manipulated to introduce the electrode assembly


12


into a selected operation site (for example, within the joint space of a knee), so that the electrode


14


contacts the tissue to be treated, and with the tissue and the electrode assembly immersed in saline.




The footswitch


5




b


(or the push button


7




b


) is then operated to set the required power level for vaporisation. The generator


1


then provides sufficient RF power to the electrode assembly


12


to vaporise the saline surrounding the electrode


14


, and to maintain a vapour pocket surrounding this electrode. Using a brushing technique, with firm pressure against the tissue surface, rapid debulking of the tissue is achieved. Gently touching the tissue will reduce the effect, and can be used to sculpture and smooth the residual tissue surface. With tissue engagement, provided the geometry of the active electrode


14


is appropriate for the application, the flow of irrigant through the active electrode will be reduced, the amount of reduction depending on the nature of the tissue surface, the application pressure and the suction pressure. Speed of debulking will, therefore, depend on these variables. Once the vaporisation occurs, the products will include vapour bubbles, carbon particles and tissue debris. All of these products are removed from the region of the action electrode


14


by aspiration caused by the suction pump. The fenestrations


14




a


are positioned so that vaporized tissue is drawn into the instrument, and then evacuated through the instrument shaft


10


, by the aspiration of the suction pump.




The electrode unit E


1


is also very, effective in removing heated saline (distension fluid) from within a joint cavity. The risk of hot distension fluid occurs primarily during power application to reach the vaporisation threshold. Once the threshold has been reached, the power requirement falls by 30-50%.




Whilst aspiration through the active electrode


14


will remove heated saline from the body cavity, and remove any risk of overheating through prolonged activation under conditions where the vaporisation threshold is not reached, the cooling effect and disruption of vapour pockets created around the active electrode will increase the vaporisation threshold. A vicious cycle can, therefore, be created, wherein the more suction applied through the electrode


14


, the more power required to reach the vaporisation threshold, and the greater the risk of heating. The other factor influencing the vaporisation threshold is the ratio of return active contact area, and the insulation separation between the two electrodes


14


and


18


. The size of the active electrode


14


and the insulation separation must, therefore, be reduced to the minimum necessary to achieve the function in order to offset the effects of aspiration in elevating the power threshold of vaporisation.




The specification of our International Patent Application GB97/00065 discloses techniques for controlling the vaporisation threshold by employing active electrode designs which assist in capturing vapour pockets and preventing cooling of the active electrode application site by screening from the flow of irrigant provided by channels in an endoscope. The fenestrated electrode


14


of

FIG. 2

, which is reminiscent of a grater in which the holes are punched outwards from the inside, provides both the aspiration holes


14




a


and the areas


14




b


where the vapour pockets may be trapped, to reduce the vaporisation power threshold.




An alternative or supplementary method of reducing the vaporisation power threshold is to pulse the suction pressure, thereby allowing the threshold to be attained between pulses. Such pulses may be synchronised with the output features of the RF generator


1


, both for safety reasons (if there is an occlusion of the suction channel), and to provide power bursts during active suction to sustain the vapour pocket, and clear any tissue occluding the fenestrations


14




a


in the active electrode


14


.




A known technique in arthroscopic surgery is to apply suction through a mechanical tissue-ribbling device, so that soft tissue present in the joint space, such as the infrapatellar fat pad, can be held in position within the nibbler jaws by suction whilst it is progressively “nibbled” away.




Attracting tissue to the active electrode


14


of the electrode unit E


1


has a similar effect as, for the reasons already given above, compliant tissue adhering to the active electrode will result in a reduction of the vaporisation power threshold. Adherent tissue will be rapidly vaporised, and small issue particles produced during vaporisation will be aspirated from the application site.




Because of its speed of debulking and side-effect configuration, the electrode unit E


1


also has advantages in urological surgery as an EVAP technique for use in conjunction with a resectoscope. A resectoscope electrode unit is introduced very differently, in that it is mounted on an endoscope prior to passage of the assembled instrument through a working sheath introduced via the urethra. The proximal end of the electrode unit is connected to a trigger assembly and an electrical contact which is integral with the resectoscope. By this means, the electrode unit E


1


can be moved back and forth through a defined range of motion by operating the trigger mechanism. As the electrode unit E


1


is assembled prior to introduction, the size of the tip is not constrained by working channel dimensions, but rather by the diameter of the working sheath which can be up to 10 mm. Part of this diameter is occupied by the support wires to the electrode unit E


1


, which wires are commonly bent in a downward angle, with respect to the endoscopic image, to the working rip, so that they do not interfere with either visualisation or its operation. The electrode


14


can have a length lying, within the range of from 3 mm to 4 mm and a width lying in the range of from 2 mm to 3 mm, and this size is necessary to urological surgery given that, on average, 20-30 grams of prostate tissue must be removed.




Because of the reservoir effect of the urinary bladder, and the mounting of the endoscope to view the rip of the active electrode


14


from below, bubble generation during vaporisation is less to a problem during endoscopic urology, as the bubbles flow away from the endoscope to accumulate in the bladder Nevertheless, the use of the electrode unit E


1


substantially reduces the possibility of bubble generation causing problems.




Although the electrode unit E


1


is intended primarily for use in the vaporisation of tissue, it can also be used for desiccation, particularly of synovial membranes or to separate muscle attachments. In this case, once the electrode assembly


12


has been introduced into a selected operation site, the RF generator


1


is actuated using the footswitch


5


a or the push button


7




a


to set the required power level for desiccation. The generator


1


will then provide sufficient RF power to the electrode assembly


12


to maintain the saline adjacent to the fenestrated electrode


14


substantially at its boiling point without creating a vapour pocket surrounding that electrode. The instrument can then be manipulated by moving the electrode


14


across the surface of the tissue to be treated in a side-to-side “painting” technique.




The electrode unit E


1


can also be used for delivering a blended power output. This is achieved by automatically alternating the output of the RF generator


1


between the desiccation and vaporisation power levels, so that more haemostasis is produced then is possible in the vaporisation mode. As a consequence, the speed of tissue debulking is reduced, but the increased haemostasis is useful when cutting or debulking vascular tissue structures. Alternatively, the output of the RF generator


1


can be pulsed at the vaporisation power level, without cycled activation of the desiccation mode. This produces a less aggressive tissue vaporisation than occurs in the vaporisation mode, with a consequent reduction in both bubble formation and the risk of tissue charring.





FIGS. 4

to


6


show electrode units E


2


to E


4


which are modified versions of the electrode unit E


1


. Accordingly, like reference numerals will be used for like parts, and only the modifications will be described in detail. Thus, the active electrode


14


of the electrode unit E


2


is a coiled spring electrode mounted within the cut-out


16




a


. The coiled spring electrode


14


is made of tungsten or an alloy of tungsten or platinum, and its proximal end is connected to the RF generator


1


via an insulated central copper conductor (not shown). The electrode unit E


2


is, however, provided with fenestrations


16




b


formed in the insulation sleeve


16


, the fenestrations


16




b


being positioned all around, and adjacent to, the active electrode


14


. These fenestrations


16




b


constitute the aspiration pathway for vapour bubbles, tissue and debris to be extracted, thereby enhancing the establishment of vapour pockets on the active electrode surface, and the inclusion of good vaporisation threshold properties, whilst ensuring good extraction of heated saline. The fenestrations


16




b


are positioned sufficiently close to the active electrode


14


to ensure that substantially all vaporised tissue is drawn into the instrument, and then evacuated through the instrument shaft


10


, by the aspiration of the suction pump. In a modified version of this embodiment, the adjacent turns of the coiled spring electrode could define additional fenestrations for assisting with the aspiration of vapour bubbles, carbon particles and tissue debris.




The electrode unit E


3


of

FIG. 5

has a “grater” active electrode


14


similar to that of

FIGS. 2 and 3

The instrument shaft


10


contains a multi-lumen tube


22


which defines a plurality of aspiration channels


24


. The active electrode


14


is connected to the RF generator


1


by means of an insulated copper conductor


26


. This embodiment has the advantage that, if a bolus of saline obstructs one or more of the channels


24


, vapour can still be aspirated through the residual “open” channels


24


. In this case, the bore of each channel


24


must not be narrower than the fenestrations


14




a


in the active electrode


14


, thereby preventing obstruction of the channels by particulate debris generated at the tissue application site.




The electrode unit E


4


of

FIG. 6

includes a single-lumen tube


22


provided with an integral filter


28


at the distal end thereof. The filter


28


prevents obstruction of the lumen tube A


2


by particulate debris generated at the tissue application site. Alternatively, the filter


28


could be formed integrally within the insulation sleeve


16


at the distal end of the tube


22


. Again, the filter


28


could comprise a mesh having a small pore size for preferentially allowing de-gassing of the vaporisation products whilst accumulating solid material on the filter. In this case, gaseous extraction will be facilitated by the fact that the proximal single-lumen aspiration tube


22


can be constructed to withstand large vacuum pressures without collapsing. Here again, the active electrode


14


is connected to the RF generator


1


by means of an insulated copper conductor


26


.




Each of the electrode units E


1


to E


4


has the additional advantage that the aspiration in the region of the active electrode


14


restricts the flow of convection currents in the saline surrounding the electrode assembly


12


. As the power threshold required to reach vaporisation is dependent on the power dissipation of the active electrode


14


and the flow characteristics around it, the power threshold is dependent upon the maximum rate of convection. Consequently, the restriction of the convection currents reduces the power threshold, and this is advantageous as it enables the use of a cheaper RF generator, as well as avoiding problems such as dissipation within the instrument, and catastrophic overheating of the active electrode. It also facilitates control of the generator once vaporisation commences. The importance of power threshold of vaporisation is discussed in greater detail in the specification of our International Patent Application GB97/00065.




Another advantage of these electrode units is that, in use, the active electrode


14


faces down, so that saline heated thereby rises to the return electrode


18


. This leads to a reduction of impedance throughout the circuit, and hence to a reduction of the heat dissipation in the saline path.




It will be apparent that modifications could be made to the embodiments described above For example, the lumen tubes


22


of the embodiments of

FIGS. 5 and 6

could be used with the electrode assembly


12


of

FIG. 4

, that is to say with the fenestrated insulation sleeve embodiment. It would also be possible to make the insulation sleeve


16


of each of the embodiments of a silicone rubber (such as a silicone polyurethane), glass, a polyimide or a thermoplastics material.




Throughout this specification, the term “pump” should be construed to include any suitable controlled vacuum source.



Claims
  • 1. An electrosurgical instrument for the treatment of tissue in the presence of an electrically-conductive fluid medium, the instrument comprising an instrument shaft, and an electrode assembly at one end of the shaft, the electrode assembly comprising a tissue treatment electrode and a return electrode which is electrically insulated from the tissue treatment electrode by means of an insulation member, the tissue treatment electrode having an exposed surface for treating tissue, and the return electrode having a fluid contact surface which is spaced proximally from the tissue treatment electrode in such a manner as to define, in use, a conductive fluid path that completes an electrical circuit between the tissue treatment electrode and the return electrode, wherein the electrode assembly is provided with at least one aperture in the region of the tissue treatment electrode through which vapour bubbles and/or particulate material can be aspirated from the region surrounding the tissue treatment electrode, and a plurality of fluid pathways leading to the aperture formed by the tissue treatment electrode.
  • 2. An electrosurgical instrument as recited in claim 1, further comprising an RF generator having a bipolar output connected to the tissue treatment electrode and the return electrode.
  • 3. An electrosurgical instrument as recited in claim 1, wherein the tissue treatment electrode is comprised of at least one filament.
  • 4. An electrosurgical instrument as claimed in claim 1, wherein said aperture is formed in the insulation member, the aperture being adjacent to the tissue treatment electrode.
  • 5. An electrosurgical instrument as recited in claim 1, wherein the tissue treatment electrode is comprised of a plurality of filaments connected to one another.
  • 6. An electrode unit as recited in claim 1, wherein the plurality of fluid pathways leading to the aperture are formed by a plurality of fenestrations in the tissue treatment electrode.
  • 7. An electrode unit for an electrosurgical instrument for the treatment of tissue in the presence of an electrically-conductive fluid medium, the electrode unit comprising a shaft having at one end means for connection to an instrument handpiece, and, mounted on the other end of the shaft, an electrode assembly comprising a tissue treatment electrode and a return electrode which is electrically insulated from the tissue treatment electrode by means of an insulation member, the tissue treatment electrode having an exposed end for treating tissue, and the return electrode having a fluid contact surface which is spaced proximally from the tissue treatment electrode in such a manner as to define, in use, a conductive fluid path that completes an electrical circuit between the tissue treatment electrode and the return electrode, wherein the electrode assembly is provided with a plurality of fluid pathways formed by the tissue treatment electrode leading to at least one aperture in the region of the tissue treatment electrode and distal to the return electrode, through which aperture vapour bubbles and/or particulate material can be aspirated from the region surrounding the tissue treatment electrode.
  • 8. An electrode unit as recited in claim 7, further comprising an RF generator having a bipolar output connected to the tissue treatment electrode and the return electrode.
  • 9. An electrode unit as recited in claim 7, wherein the tissue treatment electrode is comprised of at least one filament.
  • 10. An electrode unit as recited in claim 7, wherein the tissue treatment electrode is comprised of a plurality of filaments connected to one another.
  • 11. An electrode unit as recited in claim 7, wherein the plurality of fluid pathways leading to the aperture are formed by a plurality of fenestrations the tissue treatment electrode.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
9612993 Jun 1996 GB
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/202,025, filed, Dec. 8, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,405 the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in this application which is a 371 of PCT/GB97/01632 filed Jun. 17, 1997.

US Referenced Citations (339)
Number Name Date Kind
164184 Kidder Jun 1875 A
1366756 Wappler Jan 1921 A
1735271 Groff Nov 1929 A
1814791 Ende Jul 1931 A
1889609 Mutscheller Nov 1932 A
1932258 Wappler Oct 1933 A
1943543 McFadden Jan 1934 A
1952617 Wappler Mar 1934 A
1983669 Kimble Dec 1934 A
2050904 Trice Aug 1936 A
2056377 Wappler Oct 1936 A
2196171 Arnesen Apr 1940 A
2888928 Seiger Jun 1959 A
3035580 Guiorguiev May 1962 A
3460539 Anhalt, Sr. Aug 1969 A
3595239 Petersen Jul 1971 A
3601126 Estes Aug 1971 A
3614414 Gores Oct 1971 A
3648001 Anderson et al. Mar 1972 A
3685518 Beurle et al. Aug 1972 A
3699967 Anderson Oct 1972 A
3707149 Hao et al. Dec 1972 A
3801766 Morrison, Jr. Apr 1974 A
3815604 O'Malley et al. Jun 1974 A
3845771 Vise Nov 1974 A
3847153 Weissman Nov 1974 A
3870047 Gonser Mar 1975 A
3885569 Judson May 1975 A
3898991 Ikuno et al. Aug 1975 A
3901242 Storz Aug 1975 A
3902494 Haberlen et al. Sep 1975 A
3903891 Brayshaw Sep 1975 A
3920021 Hiltebrandt Nov 1975 A
3920022 Pastor Nov 1975 A
3923063 Andrews et al. Dec 1975 A
3929137 Gonser et al. Dec 1975 A
3939839 Curtiss Feb 1976 A
3945375 Banko Mar 1976 A
3963030 Newton Jun 1976 A
3964487 Judson Jun 1976 A
3970088 Morrison Jul 1976 A
3974833 Durden, III Aug 1976 A
4011872 Komiya Mar 1977 A
4016881 Rioux et al. Apr 1977 A
4024467 Andrews et al. May 1977 A
4033351 Hetzel Jul 1977 A
4040426 Morrison, Jr. Aug 1977 A
4043342 Morrison, Jr. Aug 1977 A
4051855 Schneiderman Oct 1977 A
4060088 Morrison, Jr. et al. Nov 1977 A
4069827 Dominy Jan 1978 A
4074718 Morrison, Jr. Feb 1978 A
4092986 Schneiderman Jun 1978 A
4114623 Meinke et al. Sep 1978 A
4116198 Roos Sep 1978 A
4119102 LeVeen Oct 1978 A
4126137 Archibald Nov 1978 A
4154240 Ikuno et al. May 1979 A
4189685 Doss Feb 1980 A
4200104 Harris Apr 1980 A
4202337 Hren et al. May 1980 A
4204549 Paglione May 1980 A
4210152 Berry Jul 1980 A
4228800 Degler, Jr. et al. Oct 1980 A
4248231 Herczog et al. Feb 1981 A
4271837 Schuler Jun 1981 A
4281373 Mabille Jul 1981 A
4301802 Poler Nov 1981 A
4326529 Doss et al. Apr 1982 A
4346332 Walden Aug 1982 A
4376263 Pittroff et al. Mar 1983 A
4381007 Doss Apr 1983 A
4416277 Newton et al. Nov 1983 A
4418692 Guay Dec 1983 A
4429698 Bentall Feb 1984 A
4448198 Turner May 1984 A
4474179 Koch Oct 1984 A
4476862 Pao Oct 1984 A
4492231 Auth Jan 1985 A
4494541 Archibald Jan 1985 A
4512338 Balko et al. Apr 1985 A
4517976 Murakoshi et al. May 1985 A
4524770 Orandi Jun 1985 A
4532924 Auth et al. Aug 1985 A
4534347 Taylor Aug 1985 A
4548207 Reimels Oct 1985 A
4559943 Bowers Dec 1985 A
4559951 Dahl et al. Dec 1985 A
4562838 Walker Jan 1986 A
4565200 Cosman Jan 1986 A
4567890 Ohta et al. Feb 1986 A
4580557 Hertzmann Apr 1986 A
4590934 Malis et al. May 1986 A
4593691 Lindstrom et al. Jun 1986 A
4617927 Manes Oct 1986 A
4657015 Irnich Apr 1987 A
4658819 Harris et al. Apr 1987 A
4658820 Klicek Apr 1987 A
4669468 Cartmell et al. Jun 1987 A
4674499 Pao Jun 1987 A
4681122 Winters et al. Jul 1987 A
4682596 Bales et al. Jul 1987 A
4688569 Rabinowitz Aug 1987 A
4696668 Wilcox Sep 1987 A
4706667 Roos Nov 1987 A
4709698 Johnston et al. Dec 1987 A
4712544 Ensslin Dec 1987 A
4727874 Bowers et al. Mar 1988 A
4735201 O'Reilly Apr 1988 A
4769005 Ginsburg et al. Sep 1988 A
4781175 McGreevy et al. Nov 1988 A
4799480 Abraham et al. Jan 1989 A
4800899 Elliott Jan 1989 A
4802476 Noerenberg et al. Feb 1989 A
4805616 Pao Feb 1989 A
4813429 Eshel et al. Mar 1989 A
4820298 Leveen et al. Apr 1989 A
4823791 D'Amelio et al. Apr 1989 A
4827927 Newton May 1989 A
4832048 Cohen May 1989 A
4850353 Stasz et al. Jul 1989 A
4860744 Johnson et al. Aug 1989 A
4878493 Pasternak et al. Nov 1989 A
4886074 Bisping Dec 1989 A
4919129 Weber, Jr. et al. Apr 1990 A
4920978 Colvin May 1990 A
4931047 Broadwin et al. Jun 1990 A
4936281 Stasz Jun 1990 A
4936301 Rexroth et al. Jun 1990 A
4936310 Engstrom et al. Jun 1990 A
4936842 D'Amelio et al. Jun 1990 A
4943290 Rexroth et al. Jul 1990 A
4950267 Ishihara et al. Aug 1990 A
4955377 Lennox et al. Sep 1990 A
4966597 Cosman Oct 1990 A
4967765 Turner et al. Nov 1990 A
4969885 Farin Nov 1990 A
4976711 Parins et al. Dec 1990 A
4994069 Ritchart et al. Feb 1991 A
4998933 Eggers et al. Mar 1991 A
5007908 Rydell Apr 1991 A
5009656 Reimels Apr 1991 A
5013312 Parins et al. May 1991 A
5019076 Yamanashi et al. May 1991 A
5035696 Rydell Jul 1991 A
5037379 Clayman et al. Aug 1991 A
5047027 Rydell Sep 1991 A
5047206 Rydell Sep 1991 A
5057107 Parins et al. Oct 1991 A
5062031 Flachenecker et al. Oct 1991 A
5071418 Rosenbaum Dec 1991 A
5080660 Buelna Jan 1992 A
5083565 Parins Jan 1992 A
5085659 Rydell Feb 1992 A
5088997 Delahuerga et al. Feb 1992 A
5098431 Rydell Mar 1992 A
5099840 Goble et al. Mar 1992 A
5108391 Flachenecker et al. Apr 1992 A
5108407 Geremia et al. Apr 1992 A
RE33925 Bales et al. May 1992 E
5117978 Blumenfeld et al. Jun 1992 A
5122138 Manwaring Jun 1992 A
5133365 Heil, Jr. et al. Jul 1992 A
5158561 Rydell et al. Oct 1992 A
5167658 Ensslin Dec 1992 A
5167659 Ohtomo et al. Dec 1992 A
5171255 Rydell Dec 1992 A
5171311 Rydell et al. Dec 1992 A
5178620 Eggers et al. Jan 1993 A
5190517 Zieve et al. Mar 1993 A
5195959 Smith Mar 1993 A
5196007 Ellman et al. Mar 1993 A
5197963 Parins Mar 1993 A
5201743 Haber et al. Apr 1993 A
5207675 Canady May 1993 A
5217457 Delahuerga et al. Jun 1993 A
5217458 Parins Jun 1993 A
5217459 Kamerling Jun 1993 A
5221281 Klicek Jun 1993 A
5244462 Delahuerga et al. Sep 1993 A
5249585 Turner et al. Oct 1993 A
5250047 Rydell Oct 1993 A
5258006 Rydell et al. Nov 1993 A
5259395 Li Nov 1993 A
5261906 Pennino et al. Nov 1993 A
5267994 Gentelia et al. Dec 1993 A
5267997 Farin et al. Dec 1993 A
5277201 Stern Jan 1994 A
5277696 Hagen Jan 1994 A
5281213 Milder et al. Jan 1994 A
5281216 Klicek Jan 1994 A
5282799 Rydell Feb 1994 A
5282845 Bush et al. Feb 1994 A
5290282 Casscells Mar 1994 A
5290283 Suda Mar 1994 A
5300068 Rosar et al. Apr 1994 A
5300069 Hunsberger et al. Apr 1994 A
5300070 Gentelia et al. Apr 1994 A
5304214 DeFord et al. Apr 1994 A
5306238 Fleenor Apr 1994 A
5317155 King May 1994 A
5318563 Malis et al. Jun 1994 A
5320627 Sorensen et al. Jun 1994 A
5330470 Hagen Jul 1994 A
5330471 Eggers Jul 1994 A
5334193 Nardella Aug 1994 A
5334198 Hart et al. Aug 1994 A
5336222 Durgin, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5342357 Nardella Aug 1994 A
5342391 Foshee et al. Aug 1994 A
5344428 Griffiths Sep 1994 A
5352222 Rydell Oct 1994 A
5354296 Turkel Oct 1994 A
5366443 Eggers et al. Nov 1994 A
5370645 Klicek et al. Dec 1994 A
5370675 Edwards et al. Dec 1994 A
5372596 Klicek et al. Dec 1994 A
5382247 Cimino et al. Jan 1995 A
5383874 Jackson et al. Jan 1995 A
5383876 Nardella Jan 1995 A
5383917 Desai et al. Jan 1995 A
5383923 Webster, Jr. Jan 1995 A
5395363 Billings et al. Mar 1995 A
5395368 Ellman et al. Mar 1995 A
5403311 Abele et al. Apr 1995 A
5419767 Eggers et al. May 1995 A
5422567 Matsunaga Jun 1995 A
5423808 Edwards et al. Jun 1995 A
5423809 Klicek Jun 1995 A
5423810 Goble et al. Jun 1995 A
5423811 Imran et al. Jun 1995 A
5431649 Mulier et al. Jul 1995 A
5437662 Nardella Aug 1995 A
5438302 Goble Aug 1995 A
5441499 Fritzsch Aug 1995 A
5443470 Stern et al. Aug 1995 A
5451223 Ben-Simhon Sep 1995 A
5454809 Janssen Oct 1995 A
5462521 Brucker et al. Oct 1995 A
5472441 Edwards et al. Dec 1995 A
5472443 Cordis et al. Dec 1995 A
5480397 Eggers et al. Jan 1996 A
5480398 Eggers et al. Jan 1996 A
5496312 Klicek Mar 1996 A
5496314 Eggers Mar 1996 A
5505728 Ellman et al. Apr 1996 A
5505730 Edwards Apr 1996 A
5507743 Edwards et al. Apr 1996 A
5514129 Smith May 1996 A
5514130 Baker May 1996 A
5514131 Edwards et al. May 1996 A
5520684 Imran May 1996 A
5520685 Wojciechowicz May 1996 A
5522815 Durgin, Jr. et al. Jun 1996 A
5531744 Nardella et al. Jul 1996 A
5536267 Edwards et al. Jul 1996 A
5540680 Guglielmi et al. Jul 1996 A
5540681 Strul et al. Jul 1996 A
5540682 Gardner et al. Jul 1996 A
5540683 Ichikawa et al. Jul 1996 A
5540684 Hassler, Jr. Jul 1996 A
5540685 Parins et al. Jul 1996 A
5542916 Hirsch et al. Aug 1996 A
5542945 Fritzsch Aug 1996 A
5545161 Imran Aug 1996 A
5545193 Fleischman et al. Aug 1996 A
5549605 Hahnen Aug 1996 A
5554172 Horner et al. Sep 1996 A
5555618 Winkler Sep 1996 A
5556396 Cohen et al. Sep 1996 A
5556397 Long et al. Sep 1996 A
5558671 Yates Sep 1996 A
5562720 Stern et al. Oct 1996 A
5569164 Lurz Oct 1996 A
5569242 Lax et al. Oct 1996 A
5569244 Hahnen Oct 1996 A
5569245 Guglielmi et al. Oct 1996 A
5571100 Goble et al. Nov 1996 A
5575789 Bell et al. Nov 1996 A
5578007 Imran Nov 1996 A
5582609 Swanson et al. Dec 1996 A
5582610 Grossi et al. Dec 1996 A
5584830 Ladd et al. Dec 1996 A
5591141 Nettekoven Jan 1997 A
5599344 Paterson Feb 1997 A
5599345 Edwards et al. Feb 1997 A
5599346 Edwards et al. Feb 1997 A
5599347 Hart et al. Feb 1997 A
5599348 Gentelia et al. Feb 1997 A
5599349 D'Amelio Feb 1997 A
5603711 Parins et al. Feb 1997 A
5603712 Koranda et al. Feb 1997 A
5607422 Smeets et al. Mar 1997 A
5609151 Mulier et al. Mar 1997 A
5609573 Sandock Mar 1997 A
5611798 Eggers Mar 1997 A
5620481 Desai et al. Apr 1997 A
5624439 Edwards et al. Apr 1997 A
5626560 Soring May 1997 A
5626575 Crenner May 1997 A
5626576 Janssen May 1997 A
5626578 Tihon May 1997 A
5628745 Bek May 1997 A
5628771 Mizukawa et al. May 1997 A
5630426 Eggers et al. May 1997 A
5633578 Eggers et al. May 1997 A
5634924 Turkel et al. Jun 1997 A
5647869 Goble et al. Jul 1997 A
5672174 Gough et al. Sep 1997 A
5683366 Eggers et al. Nov 1997 A
5693045 Eggers Dec 1997 A
5697281 Eggers et al. Dec 1997 A
5697536 Eggers et al. Dec 1997 A
5697882 Eggers et al. Dec 1997 A
5697909 Eggers et al. Dec 1997 A
5700262 Acosta et al. Dec 1997 A
5725524 Mulier et al. Mar 1998 A
5735846 Panescu et al. Apr 1998 A
5766153 Eggers et al. Jun 1998 A
5776092 Farin et al. Jul 1998 A
5792140 Tu et al. Aug 1998 A
5810764 Eggers et al. Sep 1998 A
5810809 Rydell Sep 1998 A
5830214 Flom et al. Nov 1998 A
5833689 Long Nov 1998 A
5843019 Eggers et al. Dec 1998 A
5860951 Eggers et al. Jan 1999 A
5871469 Eggers et al. Feb 1999 A
5873855 Eggers et al. Feb 1999 A
5888198 Eggers et al. Mar 1999 A
5891095 Eggers et al. Apr 1999 A
5902272 Eggers et al. May 1999 A
5904681 West, Jr. May 1999 A
5919188 Shearon et al. Jul 1999 A
5919191 Lennox et al. Jul 1999 A
5941876 Nardella et al. Aug 1999 A
5944715 Goble et al. Aug 1999 A
6093186 Goble Jul 2000 A
6210405 Goble et al. Apr 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (187)
Number Date Country
243478 Jul 1946 CH
651428 Sep 1937 DE
1007960 May 1957 DE
2222820 Nov 1973 DE
2457900 May 1976 DE
2930982 Feb 1981 DE
3209444 Oct 1982 DE
3215832 Nov 1982 DE
3119735 Jan 1983 DE
3245570 Jun 1984 DE
222207 May 1985 DE
3423356 Jan 1986 DE
3427517 Jan 1986 DE
3511107 Oct 1986 DE
3623688 Jan 1987 DE
3530335 Mar 1987 DE
3707820 Sep 1987 DE
3622337 Jan 1988 DE
3642077 Jun 1988 DE
3708801 Sep 1988 DE
3824913 Feb 1990 DE
3838840 May 1990 DE
3930451 Mar 1991 DE
4108269 Jun 1992 DE
4103972 Aug 1992 DE
4126608 Feb 1993 DE
4139029 Jun 1993 DE
4217999 Dec 1993 DE
4237321 May 1994 DE
4323585 Jan 1995 DE
4339049 May 1995 DE
4425015 Jan 1996 DE
4429478 Mar 1996 DE
19530004 Mar 1996 DE
19510185 Oct 1996 DE
19512640 Oct 1996 DE
19514552 Oct 1996 DE
19514553 Oct 1996 DE
19526243 Jan 1997 DE
19526244 Jan 1997 DE
19543547 Jan 1997 DE
19620601 Feb 1997 DE
29617461 Feb 1997 DE
19537897 Mar 1997 DE
19542417 May 1997 DE
19542418 May 1997 DE
19542419 May 1997 DE
19545539 Jun 1997 DE
19545756 Jun 1997 DE
19650797 Jun 1997 DE
0 013605 Jul 1980 EP
0 049633 Apr 1982 EP
0 067680 Dec 1982 EP
0 136855 Apr 1985 EP
0 219568 Dec 1985 EP
0 205851 Dec 1986 EP
0 280798 Sep 1988 EP
0 310431 Apr 1989 EP
0 316469 May 1989 EP
0 325456 Jul 1989 EP
0 332308 Sep 1989 EP
0 373670 Jun 1990 EP
0 392837 Oct 1990 EP
0 407057 Jan 1991 EP
0 412426 Feb 1991 EP
0 437377 Jul 1991 EP
0 448798 Oct 1991 EP
0 499491 Aug 1992 EP
0 507622 Oct 1992 EP
0 509670 Oct 1992 EP
0 517243 Dec 1992 EP
0 518230 Dec 1992 EP
0 530400 Mar 1993 EP
0 536440 Apr 1993 EP
0 558316 Sep 1993 EP
0 558318 Sep 1993 EP
0 647435 Apr 1995 EP
0 653192 May 1995 EP
0 674909 Oct 1995 EP
0 684015 Nov 1995 EP
0 688536 Dec 1995 EP
0 692224 Jan 1996 EP
0 694290 Jan 1996 EP
0 697199 Feb 1996 EP
0 709065 May 1996 EP
0 714635 Jun 1996 EP
0 717967 Jun 1996 EP
0 732080 Sep 1996 EP
0 733345 Sep 1996 EP
0 737447 Oct 1996 EP
0 740926 Nov 1996 EP
0 754437 Jan 1997 EP
57862 Sep 1953 FR
1215305 Apr 1960 FR
1454773 Oct 1966 FR
2313949 Jan 1977 FR
2443829 Jul 1980 FR
2501034 Sep 1982 FR
1361497 Jul 1974 GB
2037167 Jul 1980 GB
1583397 Jan 1981 GB
2133290 Jul 1984 GB
2145932 Apr 1985 GB
2161081 Jan 1986 GB
2164473 Mar 1986 GB
2177309 Jan 1987 GB
2179861 Mar 1987 GB
2213381 Aug 1989 GB
2214430 Sep 1989 GB
62211060 Sep 1987 JP
644491 Jan 1979 SU
WO 8103271 Nov 1981 WO
WO 8200084 Jan 1982 WO
WO 8202488 Aug 1982 WO
WO 8403829 Oct 1984 WO
WO 8801851 Mar 1988 WO
WO 9003152 Apr 1990 WO
WO 9308756 May 1993 WO
WO 9313718 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9313816 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9316650 Sep 1993 WO
WO 9319681 Oct 1993 WO
WO 9319682 Oct 1993 WO
WO 9320747 Oct 1993 WO
WO 9320877 Oct 1993 WO
WO 9404220 Mar 1994 WO
WO 9406510 Mar 1994 WO
WO 9410921 May 1994 WO
WO 9410924 May 1994 WO
WO 9410925 May 1994 WO
WO 9423659 Oct 1994 WO
WO 9426228 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9428809 Dec 1994 WO
WO 9502369 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9505781 Mar 1995 WO
WO 9509576 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9509577 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9510320 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9510321 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9517855 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9518575 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9519733 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9520360 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9523558 Sep 1995 WO
WO 9524160 Sep 1995 WO
WO 9525472 Sep 1995 WO
WO 9526686 Oct 1995 WO
WO 9530377 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9531144 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9600036 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9600039 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9600040 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9600042 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9600043 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9600528 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9604859 Feb 1996 WO
WO 9607360 Mar 1996 WO
WO 9609010 Mar 1996 WO
WO 9610367 Apr 1996 WO
WO 9614020 May 1996 WO
WO 9614021 May 1996 WO
WO 9618349 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9619152 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9623448 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9623449 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9624296 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9624301 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9627337 Sep 1996 WO
WO 9629946 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9632897 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9634567 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9634569 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9634570 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9634571 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9637146 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9638094 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9639085 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9639086 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9639088 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9639089 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9639966 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9639967 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9700646 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9700647 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9724993 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9800070 Jan 1998 WO
WO 9814131 Apr 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)
Entry
Cook, Albert M. & John G. Webster, Therapeutic Medical Devices Application and Design, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 1982, p. 349.
Pearce, John A., Electrosurgery, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1986, pp. 17, 69-75 and 87.
Wyeth, G.A., Electrosurgical Unit, pp. 1180-1202.
Everest Medical Technologies, Inc., “Everest Bipolar Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Transcript of Lecture by Dr. Olsen, Oct. 7, 1991.
Dobbie, A.K., “The Electrical Aspects of Surgical Diathermy,” Biomedical Engineering, May 1969, pp. 206-216.
Valleylab, Excerpts from Valleylab SSE2L Instruction Manual, Valleylab Part No. A 945 110 005 H, Jan. 6, 1983.
Schurr, M. O. et al., “Histologic Effects of Different Technologies for Dissection in Endoscopic Surgery:Nd:YAG Laser, High Frequency and Water-Jet,” End. Surg., vol. 2, 1994, pp. 195-201.
Newman, Laura, “Could Twist on TURP Knock Lasers Out,” Urology Times, vol. 3, No. 3, Mar. 1995, p. 21.
ArthroCare Corporation, “The Arthrocare Arthroscopic System,” 1995.
Tucker, R.D. et al., “In Vivo Effect of 5 French Bipolar and Monopolar Electro-Surgical Probes on Porcine Bladder,” Urological Research, Springer-Verlag 1990, 18:291-294.
Kramolowsky, Eugene V. et al., “The Urological Application of Electrosurgery,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 146, Sep. 1991, pp. 669-674.
Tucker, Robert D. et al., “A Comparison of Urologic Application of Bipolar Versus Monopolar Five French Electrosurgical Probes,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 141, Mar. 1989, pp. 662-665.
Kramolowsky, Eugene V. et al., “Use of 5F Bipolar Electrosurgical Probe in Endoscopic Urological Procedures,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 143, Feb. 1990, pp. 275-277.
Tucker, Robert et al., “A Bipolar Electrosurgical TURP Loop,” Abstract of Paper P14-11, 7th World Congress on Endourology and ESWL, Nov. 27-30, Kyoto, Japan, 1989, p. 248.
Ramsay, J.W. A. et al., “A Comparison of Bipolar and Monopolar Diathermy Probes in Experimental Animals,” Urological Research, Springer-Verlag 1985, 13:99-102.
German Article w/ Translation: Elsasser, E. and Roos, E., “Concerning an Instrument for Transurethral Resection without Leakage of Current,” Medizinal-Marks/Acta Medicotechnica, vol. 24, No. 4, 1976, pp. 129-134.
Nardella, Paul C., “Radio Frequency Energy and Impedance Feedback,” SPIE, vol. 1068, Catheter-Based Sensing & Imaging Technology, 1989, pp. 42-48.
Honig, William M., “The Mechanism of Cutting in Electrosurgery,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Jan. 1975, pp. 58-65.
Barry, Kevin J. et al., “The Effect of Radiofrequency-Generated Thermal Energy on the Mechanical and Histologic Characteristics of the Arterial Wall In Vivo: Implications for Radiofrequency Angioplasty,” American Heart Journal, vol. 117, No. 2, Feb. 1989, pp. 332-341.
Slager, Cornelis J. et al., “Vaporization of Atherosclerotic Plaques by Spark Erosion,” Journal of American College of Cardiology, 1985, pp. 1382-1386.
Lee, Benjamin I. et al., “Thermal Compression and Molding of Atherosclerotic Vascular Tissue with Use of Radiofrequency Energy: Implications for Radiofrequency Balloon Angioplasty,” Journal of American College of Cardiology, vol. 13, No. 5, Apr. 1989, pp. 1167-1175.
Piercey, J.R.A. et al., “Electrosurgical Treatment of Experimental Bleeding Canine Gastric Ulcers,” Gastroenterology, vol. 74, No. 3, 1978, pp. 527-534.
Protell, Robert L. et al., “Computer-Assisted Electrocoagulation: Bipolar vs. Monopolar in the Treatment of Experimental Canine Gastric Ulcer Bleeding,” Gastroenterology, vol. 80, No. 3, 1981, pp. 451-455.
Johnston, James H. et al., “Experimental Comparison of Endoscopic Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser, Electrosurgery, and Heater Probe for Canine Gut Arterial Coagulation,” Gastroenterology, vol. 92, No. 5, May 1987, pp. 1101-1108.
Dennis, M.B. et al., “Evaluation of Electrofulguration in Control of Bleeding of Experimental Gastric Ulcers,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 24, No. 11, Nov. 1979, pp. 845-848.
Silverstein, Fred E. et al., “Endoscopic Hemostasis Using Laser Photocoagulation and Electrocoagulation,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 26, No. 7, July Supplement 1981, pp. 31s-40s.
Auth, D.C., “Animal Testing of Endoscopic Hemostasis with Lasers and Other Devices,” Endoscopy, vol. 18, Supplement 2, May 1986, pp. 36-39.
McLean, A. J., “The Bovie Electrosurgical Current Generator—Some Underlying Principles and Results,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 18, 1929, pp. 1863-1873.
McLean, A. J., “Characteristics of Adequate Electrosurgical Current,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. XVIII, No. 3, Feb. 16, 1932, pp. 417-441.
Wattiez, Arnaud et al., Electrosurgery in Operative Endoscopy, Blackwell Science Ltd., London, 1995, pp. 87-93, 155-163.
Farin, G., “Pneumatically Controlled Bipolar Cutting Instrument,” End. Surg., 1993, pp. 1-3.
Muller, W., “The Advantages of Laparoscopic Assisted Bipolar High-Frequency Surgery,” End. Surg., 1993, pp. 1-6.
Reidenbach, H. D., “Fundamentals of Bipolar High-Frequency Surgery,” End. Surg. 1993, pp. 85-90.
Penketh, Richard et al., “Clinical Evaluation of the Procision Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator During Laparoscopic Gynaecological Procedures,” EAES, 2nd International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Madrid, Sep. 15-17, 1994.
Lloyd, David M. et al., “A New Portable Bipolar Generator-Use in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” EAES, 2nd International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Madrid, Sep. 15-17, 1994.
Buchelt, Martin et al., “Excimer Laser Ablation of Fibrocartilage: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 11, 1991, pp. 271-279.
Srinivasan, R., “Ablation of Polymers and Biological Tissue by Ultraviolet Lasers,” Science, vol. 234, Oct. 31, 1986, pp. 559-565.
Pearce, John A., “Chapter 3 Electrosurgery,” Handbook of Biomedical Engineering, Ed. Jacob Kline, Academic Press, Inc., 1988, pp. 99-113.
Selikowitz, Stuart M. et al., “Electric Current and Voltage Recordings on the Myocardium During Electrosurgical Procedures in Canines,” Reprint from Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Mar. 1987, vol. 164, pp. 219-224.
Tucker, Robert D. et al., “Demodulated Low Frequency Currents from Electrosurgical Procedures,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Jul. 1984, vol. 159, pp. 39-43.
Lu, David Y. et al., “Electrical Thermal Angioplasty: Catheter Design Features, In Vitro Tissue Ablation Studies and In Vivo Experimental Findings,” Am J Cardiol, vol. 60, 1987, pp. 1117-1122.
Malis, Leonard I., “Electrosurgery: Technical Note,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 85, 1996, pp. 970-975.
Slager, C. J. et al., “Spark Erosion of Arteriosclerotic Plaques,” Kardiologie, vol. 76, Suppl. 6, 1987, pp. 67-71.
Geddes, Leslie A., Medical Device Accidents—With Illustrative Cases, CRC Press, New York, 1998, p. 93 (commentary on Honig, William M., “The Mechanism of Cutting in Electrosurgery,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Jan. 1975, pp. 58-65).
Valleylab, Inc., “Force Electrosurgical Generators Instruction Manual,” Valleylab Part No. 945 110 039 A, Feb. 1987, pp. 59-62.
Valleylab, Inc., “Advances in Bipolar Electrosurgery for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Advances in Bipolar Electrosurgery, pp. 1-4.
Description of Codman and Johnson & Johnson Malis CMC-III Bipolar System.
Pfizer/Valleylab Press Release “Valleylab Inc. Introduces The Procision Bipolar Electrosurgery System,” Sep. 15, 1994.
ArthroCare Corporation, “ArthroCare Arthroscopic Electrosurgery System, Model 970 Operator's Manual,” Feb. 1996.
ArthroCare Corporation, “Arthroscopic Electrosurgery System, System 2000 Operator's Manual,” Jan. 1998.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/202025 US
Child 09/756676 US