This invention relates generally to apparatuses and methods for laying underground cable or irrigation tubing.
Aesthetics have always played an important role in home design and landscaping. Indeed, most homeowners take pride in the appearance of their yards and landscaping, often devoting many hours each weekend to ensuring that their lawn and garden look attractive and uncluttered.
Unfortunately, the necessities of day-to-day living often result in the use and installation of unsightly equipment. For example, the use of a garden hose and sprinkler to water the lawn and garden, the use of a fence to contain a pet, the running of cables and wires for lighting, cable TV, internet services, etc. all are visibly unappealing to many homeowners. The solution of choice for many homeowners is to run such cables, wires, pet containment systems, sprinkler systems, etc., underground so as to be hidden from view while still allowing the homeowner to reap the benefits provided thereby.
To run each of these varied systems underground, in the past, trenchers have been used to dig a small trench in the yard into which is laid the cable, wire, pipe, etc., for the particular system being installed. The soil removed from the trench is then put back in over the wire, cable, pipe, etc. In this way, each of these systems, wires, cable, etc., are hidden from view.
Unfortunately, this solution to the aesthetic problem has resulted in an underground maze of wires, cable, pipes, etc., for which no coordinated mapping is typically provided. Further, utility marking services such as JULIE do not provide marking of such consumer-installed underground cables, wires, pipes, etc., instead only marking the main utilities of gas, electric, water, etc. As a result, the attempted installation of subsequent underground systems using a trencher often results in damage or breakage of the underground lines, cables, wires, pipes, etc., of previously installed underground systems. This not only results in frustration of the homeowner as the affected system may no longer be used until it is repaired, but also additional expense for the installers of the subsequent underground systems who have caused the damage and now must bear the expense of repair. Additionally, the type of damage resulting from the use of current methods for underground cable laying often results in multiple breaks in the underground system. That is, oftentimes the underground line, cable, wire, pipe, etc., is snagged by these trenching apparatus and pulled along until a failure occurs in the affected system. Such failures may be at locations other than the point at which the system was snagged by the trencher, often requiring a large portion of the damaged underground system to be dug up to effectuate the repair at the locations of the break.
A further disadvantage with current methods for laying underground cable, wire, flexible tubing, etc., is that the current methods leave a visible scar in the yard. This scar typically requires the planting of additional grass or other ground cover seed, which further increases the expense, detracts from the aesthetics which it was meant to protect, and requires additional lawn care to properly water the newly planted seed to ensure germination and full growth to fully hide the trenched scar.
The above-mentioned problems, and desires, are not limited to residential installations, but are also encountered in institutional and commercial settings. For example, a great deal of care is often lavished on establishing and maintaining healthy turf on athletic fields, used for playing football, baseball, soccer, or other outdoor sports. Large grassy areas, forming part of the landscaping around commercial buildings, in public or private parks, and on golf courses, are also examples of places in which it is often necessary, or desirable, to provide complex underground irrigation installations, or to run cabling for electric power, communication, lighting systems, or heating systems under the surface of the turf.
Where it becomes necessary, or desirable, to run additional cables or tubing through an area of established turf, it is desirable that such additional cables or tubing be installed in a manner which does not leave a visible scar in the existing turf, or damage underground cable or tubing which is already in place under the turf.
Previously available equipment and methods have not proved to be entirely satisfactory in alleviating the above-mentioned problems, and in meeting the above described desires. For example, in one piece of equipment currently being marketed for installation of subsurface dripperlines in turf grass, a multi-blade lawn plow includes a vertically mounted coulter wheel, for slicing through the turf of a football field, or the like, followed by a ripper blade extending below the coulter wheel, and having a passage therein for feeding dripperless irrigation tubing into the ground behind the ripper blade. The lawn plow further includes a pair of tamping feet mounted adjacent the ripper blade for compacting the soil after the dripperline has been buried. The entire multi-blade plow apparatus is mounted on a frame, which is in turn attached to a vibrating mounting arrangement of a trenching-type machine. Where the subsurface installation includes existing underground cabling and/or tubing, the ripper blades of the multi-blade lawn plow will, in all probability, catch and cut, or otherwise damage, the existing underground installation. The narrow, relatively sharp edges of the vertically oriented coulter wheels may also cut or damage the existing underground installation. It is, therefore, unlikely that such a multi-blade lawn plow could be utilized for installing cable or dripperline irrigation tubing in a turf grass installation having existing underground heating cables, for example.
It is also not likely that such a multi-blade lawn plow could be utilized for laying dripperline irrigation tubing over the top of an existing irrigation tubing system, supplying traditional sprinkler heads, for example, without prior removal of the existing sprinkler tubing. Attempts to utilize such a multi-blade lawn plow for laying the dripperline irrigation tubing under the surface of the ground on top of the existing tubing feeding traditional sprinkler heads would likely result in the ripper blades catching on the previously installed irrigation tubing, and thereby causing significant damage to the turf grass surface as the existing tubing is pulled along by the ripper blades.
In addition to the above-mentioned problems with utilizing previously available trenching equipment and lawn plows, such as leaving a visible scar in the turf, and/or cutting, catching, or otherwise damaging previously installed underground facilities, there are further difficulties which must be overcome, in placing underground cable, wire, line, tubing, etc. under a turf surface. For example, cable, of the type utilized in cable television installations, is typically supplied on reels having a relatively small diameter. As a result of the relatively small reel diameter, the cable tends to develop a shape memory which will cause it to attempt to re-coil itself, and, in the process, spring upward out of the ground, if it is not secured by a significant amount of soil pressure. In addition, care must be taken to ensure that the cable is not kinked, damaged by abrasion, cut, or overly strained while being guided into the soil under the turf. In this regard, it is necessary that the bend radii imposed by application equipment be relatively large. As a further complication, the outer surfaces of the cable, and/or tubing, etc., being laid is of a nature which can create substantial frictional force against various structures of an apparatus being utilized for installing the cable and/or tubing. If the frictional force of the laying mechanism, together with any resistance to movement through the apparatus by changing the direction of the cable, is not kept relatively low, the laid cable or tubing will be dragged along with the placement machine, rather than remaining where it is laid down under the turf.
Maintaining the health and appearance of the turf during and subsequent to installation of the cable or tubing also requires considerable care. It is necessary, for example, to close any opening made for laying the cable or tubing quickly enough, and with properly applied closure force so that exposure of the roots to drying and sunlight, will be minimized, and in such a manner that effective contact of the roots with the surrounding soil will be reestablished following closure of the opening in the turf.
Through consideration of the above described problems and desires, the inventor of the present invention came to recognize that an improved apparatus, differing substantially from those previously known, would be required. In this regard, the inventor determined that an apparatus and method utilizing equipment for cutting a slice through the turf by action of a rolling element would be preferable to previously known approaches using ripper blades or other types of traditional trenching equipment.
The inventor further recognized that the nature of the turf itself, when subjected to slicing in an appropriate manner, could be used to significant advantage in developing a new and improved apparatus and method for laying underground cable, wire, line tubing, etc. For example, unlike loose or bare soil, turf tends to spring back, of its own accord, to close any slits cut therein. Turf also tends to hold loosened soil in place, within the roots, rather than allowing the soil to be moved upward onto the surface of the ground.
The inventor also observed that even a relatively shallow-rooted layer of turf, such as freshly laid sod, provided substantial resistance to having a cable pop back out of the ground, once the turf and soil was compacted back into place over the laid cable or tubing. This was observed to be particularly the case in well-watered turf.
Having concluded that traditional trenching equipment and methods were unlikely to provide an improved apparatus and method, solving the problems and meeting the desires laid out above, the inventor considered a variety of other solutions, including the use of various structural aspects of equipment utilized for planting seeds through both conventional and reduced or zero tillage methods. Such seed planting equipment has traditionally included the use of one or more rolling coulters, in conjunction with some form of seed feeding tube or structure, and a closure device, for creating shallow V-shaped furrows into which the seed is deposited.
Such traditional seed-planting-type equipment is not suitable for use, however, or readily adapted for use, in laying underground cables or tubing, under turf.
As illustrated in
In order to create the V-shaped furrow desired for seed planting, a typical seed planting apparatus often utilizes multiple coulters A or disks having a point of contact C with one another that is located at a considerable distance below a center B of the coulter A or disk, with the coulter A or disk angling outward vertically above and horizontally aft of the point of contact C. The point of contact C is often selected to correspond with the ground level G, when the seed planting mechanism is penetrating the soil and forming a V-shaped furrow of the desired depth D.
As illustrated in
In similar fashion, U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,274, discloses a pair of forming disks having a 14″ diameter and staggered longitudinally by 1″, fore and aft with respect to one another, and the axes inclined so that the included angle is 9.5° and the disks substantially contact each other at a point forward of their axes at about 38° downwardly from the horizontal. By virtue of this arrangement, the 14″ diameter disks create a furrow having a 2.69″ depth, when the point of contact is located at the surface of the soil.
Because of the point of contact C is located so low on the disks A of prior seed planting equipment, and as a result of the disks A being angled with respect to one another and diverging upward of the point of contact, if such seed planting equipment were forced deeper into the ground, the disks A would cease to function properly, with the individual disks A each cutting a separate slit into the soil at the surface G of the ground, while leaving undisturbed soil in the space between the upwardly diverging edges of the disks A.
An additional problem preventing the use of prior seed-planting equipment for laying of cable or tubing stems from the fact that such seed-planting equipment is typically designed for use only in relatively loose, non-turf applications. This is true, even for so-called reduced tillage planting equipment. In general, the rotating coulters or disks of a seed-planting apparatus are utilized to cut through the soil, and by virtue of the compound angling of the disks, to remove the soil from the furrow and deposit it onto the ground alongside the furrow, so that the seeds may be placed into the vertex at the bottom of the V-shaped furrow. The seed-planting apparatus typically includes a closure mechanism which moves the soil removed from the furrow back into the furrow, to close the furrow, and firm the soil over the seeds to provide good soil contact with the seed in the furrow and to crush the sides of the furrow to provide a loose layer of soil over the seeds, in the manner described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,092,255. For proper germination of the seed, soil contact is required, but it is also desirable that the soil not be overly compacted to the point where the plant emerging from the seed will be prevented from reaching the surface of the ground and emerging from the furrow. It will be noted, by those having skill in the art, that the seeds are also individual elements, which are individually placed into the furrow, in stark contrast to a continuous length of cable or tubing which may have a shape memory tending to cause it to coil spring back out of the ground, or otherwise move during the process of being laid into the soil. The loose nature of soil placed back into the furrow by a closure and firming apparatus of a seed planter is thus not designed, and is totally inadequate for compressing the soil over a cable or irrigation tube to the degree required for subsurface cable or tubing installation, particularly when laying cable with a shape memory tending to cause the cable to re-coil and pop out of loosely packed or firmed soil.
As previously stated, prior seed-planting equipment, including so-called zero-tillage or reduced-tillage planters are not designed for use in turf applications. Trash remaining on the surface of the soil, or clumps of turf will typically result in substantial interference with the operation of typical planting equipment. In order to deal with this problem, it is common practice for prior seed-planting equipment to include various types of trash cutting blades ahead of coulters used for making a furrow in the soil. Such trash cutting devices have included, for example, a wavy-edged coulter wheel for slicing up and disbursing any trash or clumps of turf in the path of the furrow-forming coulter wheel. Such trash cutting and disbursing devices leave unsightly scared areas in turf, and would be totally antethical to the purposes of the present invention. It is noted that in some prior types of planters, used for placing seed into grassy surfaces of a pasture, or the like, single vertical coulters are utilized for cutting a very shallow (less than 1″ deep, for example) furrow into the ground with the seed being deposited therein, as part of an apparatus commonly known as a drill, rather than a planter.
The seed delivery tubes, of the type used in seed planting equipment, are also typically designed to extend substantially vertically, in order to maximize delivery rate of the seed into the furrow. As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,347,594 B1, curved delivery tubes tend to cause reduced delivery rate, and are thus typically not utilized in seed planting equipment. Vertical, non-curved, delivery tubes, of the type typically used in seed planting equipment, would be highly undesirable, and essentially unworkable, for feeding cable or tubing. Such a vertically oriented, non-curved configuration, would not lend itself at all to smoothly feeding cable or tubing into the ground in a horizontal direction, behind a coulter wheel or wheels, in a manner which did not create excessive drag within the delivery tube, or other adverse affects such as straining, scraping, or kinking of the cable or tube at the point where it must make a transition from the end of the essentially vertically oriented delivery tube into the horizontal resting position it must assume at the bottom of the furrow created by the coulter wheels.
Prior seed-planting apparatuses also do not include any structure or device capable of holding a cable or tube stationary within the bottom of a trench or furrow, while the trench or furrow is closed and the soil compacted sufficiently around the cable or tube to prevent it from springing out of the trench or being dragged along with the cable-laying machine. Although some prior seed-planting machines include provisions for precluding having the seed bounce out of the furrow, prior to being covered, these devices would not be useful for holding a cable or tube in place, in accordance with the requirements of the present invention. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,253,412, to Hogenson, a series of plates are joined together by pairs of links and attached behind the discharge end of a seed delivering boot. The plates of Hogenson are not capable of exerting any appreciable downward force for holding a cable or tube in place, in the manner required by a cable laying apparatus. U.S. Pat. No. 5,092,255, to Long et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,918,557, to Schaffert, disclose seed boot extensions for reducing seed bounce and to help direct bouncing seeds into the vertex in the bottom portion of a V-shaped furrow. The boot extensions of Long and Schaffert are formed from a flexible material, in order to allow the boot extension to ride up over any chunks of soil within the furrow. The extensions of Long and Schaffert would not apply sufficient force for holding a cable or tube, in accordance with the requirements of the invention. In addition, the extension of Schaffert is supported at a distance above the furrow, for deflecting seed back into the furrow, but does not contact the furrow or seed continuously.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,673,638, to Keeton, discloses a resilient seed firming attachment for a planting machine having a free end, which is cylindrically shaped, or otherwise configured into a shape such as an inverted V shape substantially conforming to the furrow shape, for positioning seed kernels into the furrow apex. Given the downwardly convex shape of the seed forming attachment of Keeton, it will be apparent, to those having skill in the art, that the seed firming attachment of Keeton would not be usable for holding a cable or tube in place, in accordance with the requirements of the invention. Specifically, the downwardly convex surface of the seed firming attachment of Keeton would not remain positioned on top of the upwardly convex surface of the cable or tubing, but would tend to slide off of the upwardly convex surface of the tubing, or would allow the cable or tubing to slide outward and upward around the firming attachment of Keeton. As a result, the cable or tube would not be held in place, and would likely be pulled upward out of the ground and potentially be wrapped around the firming attachment of Keeton.
As a final point of inadequacy of prior seed-planting apparatuses to be utilized for, or to be readily adapted for, laying a cable or tube, it will be noted that the furrow closure and firming arrangements of seed-planting apparatuses have typically been positioned at a relatively long distance behind the coulters utilized for making the furrow. This elongated spacing would make it more difficult to achieve the various requirements of the present invention, such as quickly closing the turf, after insertion of the cable or tubing, and compacting the turf and soil over the laid cable or tubing to a degree sufficient to hold it in place within the soil and preclude having the cable or tube being drawn through the soil with the apparatus used for installing the cable or tube under the turf.
There exists, therefore, a need in the art for a new and improved underground cable, wire, line, tubing, etc., laying apparatus and method that substantially reduces or eliminates the risk of breaking other underground systems, and which does not leave a visible scar in the yard that requires additional care and expense to correct.
The term “cable”, as used herein, with regard to describing the present invention, is intended to be construed broadly to include not only cable, but also line, wire, hose, fiber optic cable, tubing, etc., or the like, that one may desire to vary under the surface of the ground, and in particular, under the surface of soil having turf growing thereon.
The present invention provides a new and improved underground cable and the like laying apparatus. More particularly, the present invention provides a new and improved underground cable laying apparatus that is capable of crossing without damaging other underground cables and the like. Further, the present invention provides a new and improved underground cable laying apparatus that does not leave a visibly obvious scar in the lawn under which the cable has been laid.
In one form of the invention, an underground cable laying apparatus includes a mounting yoke, a pair of angularly displaced turf slicing wheels, and a cable guide tube. The pair of angularly displaced turf slicing wheels are rotatably coupled to the mounting yoke, in such a manner that the turf slicing wheels define a forward contact area therebetween. The cable guide tube is positioned aft of the forward contact area of the turf slicing wheels, with the cable guide tube further having a cable inlet and a cable outlet.
In an underground cable laying apparatus, according to the invention, each of the angularly displaced turf slicing wheels may define a radius and an outer periphery thereof, and be mounted for rotation about a respective turf slicing wheel axis directed such that, when viewed from either side of the apparatus, the outer peripheries of the turf slicing wheels are substantially super-imposed upon one another vertically and horizontally, with the peripheries coming together at a point of contact in the forward contact zone and disposed substantially horizontally forward of the axes of the turf slicing wheels. The point of contact may be angularly positioned within a range of zero to twenty degrees down from a horizontal extension of the axes of the turf slicing wheels. In some forms of the invention, the point of contact may be vertically positioned substantially horizontally level with the axes, and substantially at ground level when the apparatus is slicing the turf, such that substantially the entire radius of the turf slicing wheels is disposed below ground level in operation. The pair of turf slicing wheels may be angularly displaced relative to one another along a vertical axis of the mounting yoke, in such a manner that the forward contact area is disposed substantially below the point of contact, and the outer peripheries of the turf slicing wheels diverge below the forward contact area, in such a manner that the slit in the turf has a defined horizontally extending bottom width thereof, rather than being substantially V-shaped and terminating in a vertex of the V-shape at the bottom of the slit.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the underground cable laying apparatus includes a pair of angularly displaced turf slicing wheels that slice and separate the turf under which the underground cable is to be laid. A cable feed tube is positioned between the turf slicing wheels to guide the underground cable between the turf slicing wheels. A cable feed guide wheel is positioned rearward of the opening of the cable feed tube to aid in the positioning and proper laying of the underground cable in a smooth fashion. In a preferred embodiment, the leading edge of the cable feed tube includes a feed tube support extension member to provide additional rigidity and stabilization of the cable feed tube placement while laying the underground cable. A cable guide wheel cleaning mechanism can be applied to prevent the build up of soil on the guide wheel. A cable guide may also be employed at an insertion end of the cable feed tube.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the underground cable laying apparatus also includes turf closing wheels operative to close the slit in the turf into which the cable has been laid. These turf closing wheels are carried by a turf closure housing that is pivotably coupled to the mounting yoke of the cable laying apparatus. Preferably, the turf closing wheels are spring loaded by a turf follower spring within the turf closure housing. This turf follower spring is preferably adjustable to vary the spring load tension on the closing wheels based upon the type of lawn under which the cable is to be laid. Positioning detents or blocks limit the downward travel of the turf closure housing under action of the turf follower spring.
In a preferred method of laying underground cable, and the like, in accordance with the teachings of the present invention, a thin slice in the turf is opened by the turf slicing wheels. Preferably, the soil is moist, either from natural sources or from a step of watering. Cable or the like is then positioned within the open slice in the turf. Preferably, this step is accomplished by guiding the cable to be laid into the slice in the turf. This step of guiding may be accomplished in a preferred embodiment through the use of a cable feed tube having at an aft end thereof a cable guide, which may take the form of a wheel, roller, guide bar, etc., configured for maintaining the cable in the proper position within the slice in the turf.
A cable guide, according to the invention, may take a variety of forms having a downwardly facing, non-convex surface thereof adapted for contacting the cable. Such a non-convex contact surface may be flat, concave, and may include a groove therein for partial receipt within the groove of the cable. Alternatively, or in addition, the cable guide may be formed of a flexible material having the ability to conform to the upwardly convex upper surface of the cable. In some forms of the invention, the cable guide may take the form of a flexible segment of tubing, having a bore therein for passage therethrough of the cable, with a lower end of the cable guide being directed, or flexibly movable by virtue of contact with the bottom of the slice in the turf to expel the cable in a substantially horizontal direction into the bottom of the slice in the turf.
Preferably, the method of laying underground cable in accordance with the present invention also includes the step of closing the slice in the turf once the cable has been laid therein. This step may be performed by providing a closing force in a direction to close the slit. Preferably, this closing force is applied to either side of the slit to preclude damage to the turf under which the cable has been laid.
Through the method of the present invention, damage to other underground systems, such as invisible fencing, other cables or wires, or sprinkler systems is precluded or the likelihood of such is significantly reduced. This is so because the rolling action of the turf slicing wheels does not snag or otherwise cut the other underground wires as occurs within the prior art methods of laying cable. As such, a significant advantage is realized through the use of the present invention for laying underground cable and the like. Similarly, by opening a thin slice in the turf which is then closed by applying a force to either side of the slice, the unsightly scarring of the turf that commonly results with prior art methods is also precluded.
Other aspects, objectives and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification illustrate several aspects of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
a and 7b are schematic illustrations of a typical prior art seed planting mechanism, having one or more coulters arranged for cutting a V-shaped furrow in the earth, for deposition of seeds therein, with the illustrations further showing that the depth of such a V-shaped furrow below ground level is considerably less than a radius of the coulter;
a-8c illustrate the manner in which the invention is utilized for cutting a non-V-shaped slit into turf-covered soil, with a pair of angled coulters, in accordance with the invention, in such a manner that the depth of the non-V-shaped slit is significantly larger than the depth of the V-shaped furrow formed by prior art devices and methods, with the depth of the slit, according to the invention, being substantially equal to the radius of the angled coulters;
While the invention will be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments, there is no intent to limit it to those embodiments. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Turning now to the drawings, there is illustrated in
As may be seen from this
In addition to the turf slicing wheels 14, 16, a turf closing mechanism, for example turf closing wheels 22, 24 carried on a turf closure housing 26, is pivotably mounted to the yoke 12 by the closure assembly mounting arms 28, 30. The turf closure housing 26 may include positioning detents 32, 34, blocks, shoulders, or other movement limiting structure to prevent the turf closure wheels 22, 24 and their associated housing 26 from pivoting downward beyond a desired location. However, as will be discussed more fully below, the upward pivoting of the housing 26 is preferably unimpeded within a range to allow the turf closing wheels 22, 24 to follow the contours of the soil into which the cable has been laid.
The underground cable laying apparatus also includes a cable feed tube 36 used to guide the cable to be laid through the apparatus 10. To facilitate this operation, the cable feed tube 36 includes a cable inlet 38 at a forward location of the apparatus 10 that receives the cable from the spool or other holding device. If desired, the cable feed tube 36 may also include a cable guide 40 positioned above inlet 38. This cable guide 40 may have a diameter larger than the inlet 38 to allow for some play in the cable before it enters inlet 38. The cable feed tube 36 leads down between the turf slicing wheels 14 to a position rearward of the leading edges thereof. At this position the cable feed tube outlet 42 dispenses the cable to be laid in the slice in the turf which has been created by the turf slicing wheels 14, 16. At this outlet 42 a feed tube support extension member 44 may be provided to add additional stability and support for the end of the cable feed tube 36.
As may also be seen from this cross-sectional illustration of
As may be seen from the frontal isometric illustration of
As shown in
As illustrated in
In
For purposes of comparison, the diameter of the coulter A in the prior art seed-planting apparatus, shown in
By way of comparison, as shown in
As shown in
A comparison of
In practicing the invention, it is preferable that the turf be well watered, to enhance its capability to be spread apart, without having dry loose dirt particles brought up onto the surface of the ground, and also to be more readily compacted over the cable, after the cable has been deposited in the bottom of the slice in the turf.
As may be seen from the rear isometric view of
In operation, the apparatus 10 is lowered by the vehicle so that the contact area 62 of the turf slicing wheels contacts the upper surface 64 of the turf with the contact point 61 located substantially at the surface G of the ground. As the vehicle travels across the turf, rotation of the turf slicing wheels 14, 16 creates the slit in the turf that preferably opens both horizontally and vertically to receive the cable to be laid therein. Since the turf closure wheels 22, 24 are displaced horizontally from one another by an amount greater than the maximum slit width, the wheels 22, 24 ride on the outside of the slit and provide a downward and inward closure force to effectuate a closure of the slit once the cable has been laid therein. The amount of force applied on the sides of the slit is dependent upon the setting of the spring force of the turf follower spring 52 as discussed above. Also, due to the close proximity of the turf closure wheels 22, 24 to the rearward edge of the turf slicing wheels 14, 16, closure of the slit into which the cable has been laid occurs in very close proximity to the point where the cable leaves the cable feed guide wheel. In this way, the proper positioning of the cable within the slit is ensured. With prior trencher systems, coils in the cable may allow the cable to rise above the bottom of the trench before the soil is placed back in the trench, resulting in areas where the cable is shallower than in others, which may result in uncovering of the cable and forming a hazardous condition.
As discussed briefly above, to ensure that the cable is properly positioned within the slit in the turf, in the exemplary embodiment of the cable laying apparatus 10, a cable feed guide wheel 46 is used. However, one skilled in the art will recognize that a roller or other guide mechanism may be used at this location such as the alternate embodiment discussed below in relation to
In an embodiment that utilizes a cable feed guide wheel 26, such as that illustrated in
In practicing the invention, a cable feed guide may take a variety of forms other than the grooved cable guide wheel 46 described above. For example,
The underground cable laying apparatus of the present invention provides significant advantage through the use of the turf slicing wheels, particularly in installation locations where other installed underground systems may be in place, and where a visible scar in the turf resulting from the cable laying operation is not desired. In the first instance, the apparatus of the present invention provides a significant advantage through the use of the rotating turf slicing wheels for providing the slit in the turf into which the cable is to be laid. Since the turf slicing wheels rotate, there is a significantly reduced likelihood of damage to other installed underground systems as results from typical trenchers. Specifically, the rotating turf slicing wheels will not snag and pull the other underground systems which it encounters, and instead merely rolls over them while leaving them in place. This non-damaging contact with previously installed underground systems is aided by the angular relationship between the two turf slicing wheels. That is, the relative angular displacement of the turf slicing wheels forms a contact portion 62 that slices the top layer of the turf, but then separate from one another at all other locations. As a result, contact with previously installed underground systems often occurs at a position where the turf slicing wheels 14, 16 are separated from one another, but are still in close proximity. As a result, the contact force is dispersed at the two contact points with each of the individual turf slicing wheels. Since these wheels are most likely still in close proximity, the contact force is not sufficient to damage the exterior surface of the previously installed underground system.
In the second instance, unlike blade type systems that gouge a slit into the turf, and trencher systems that completely remove the soil to form a trench, the underground cable laying apparatus of the present invention merely opens a slit in the turf, which is quickly reclosed once the cable has been placed therein. The angular placement of the turf slicing wheels ensures a narrow slit is initiated in the turf, is slightly widened to allow placement of the cable therein, and then is immediately reclosed by providing angular downward and inward force on the sides of the slit opened by the turf slicing wheels. As a result, it is nearly impossible to observe where the slit was opened in the turf once the cable has been laid therein. This is especially true when the turf is moist, or has been recently watered.
Experience has shown that the present invention may be practiced in a wide variety of soil types and turf conditions. It is preferred, when practicing the invention, that the turf be generally well watered, so that the soil is moist down to the depth D of the slit below the surface of the ground G. Accordingly, it may be desirable in practicing the invention, to water the turf prior to installing the cable therein.
All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) is to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
This patent application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/680,059, filed Oct. 7, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10680059 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 11473433 | Jun 2006 | US |