The present invention relates generally to energy-absorbing structures for vehicles, and more particularly to an underrun energy-absorbing structure with fewer parts and shorter assembly time, as compared with conventional energy absorbing structures.
Light truck vehicles (LTV's) with energy-absorbing structures typically decrease vehicle underrun in collisions with smaller passenger cars. To that end, energy-absorbing structures typically extend downward from the vehicle frame of the LTV. Current energy-absorbing structures include a blocker beam and complex bracketry. Blocker beam typically extends between rails and is offset downward from the vehicle frame for blocking the smaller passenger vehicle. The complex bracketry typically attaches blocker beam to the vehicle frame.
Blocker beam and bracketry typically add a significant amount of weight to the vehicle. The bracketry typically includes a high number of parts, which can increase in-plant processing time and manufacturing costs.
It would therefore be desirable to provide an underrun protection energy-absorbing structure that has a simple and robust construction with a substantially lighter overall mass and fewer parts, as compared with conventional energy-absorbing structures.
An underrun energy-absorbing structure (“structure”) for a vehicle is provided. The structure includes a rail member, a deformable crush tube, and a plate. Rail member is formed from an inboard panel and an outboard panel. Crush tube is sandwiched between inboard panel and outboard panel and extends perpendicularly from rail member. Plate is adjacent to crush tube and extends perpendicularly from rail member. Plate is supported by crush tube during a vehicle collision.
One advantage of the invention is that a structure is provided that decreases vehicle underrun during collisions between LTV's and smaller passenger vehicles.
Another advantage of the invention is that a structure is provided that has a lighter construction with fewer parts, as compared with conventional energy-absorbing constructions.
Yet another advantage of the invention is that a structure is provided that has a substantially short manufacturing cycle time.
Other advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon considering the following detailed description and appended claims, and upon reference to the accompanying drawings.
For a more complete understanding of this invention, reference should now be made to the embodiments illustrated in greater detail in the accompanying drawings and described below by way of the examples of the invention:
In the following figures, the same reference numerals are used to identify the same components in the various views.
Referring to
As illustrated in
Rail member 16 is formed from an inboard panel 22 and an outboard panel 24. Inboard panel 22 is welded or otherwise suitably attached to outboard panel 24. In the illustrated embodiment, inboard panel 22 and outboard panel 24 each have stepped flanges 26, 26′. In particular, stepped flange 26 for inboard panel 22 includes a mounting flange 28, a seat 30, and a pair of inboard flanges 32. Likewise, stepped flange 26′ for outboard panel 24 includes a mounting flange 28′, a seat 30′, and a pair of outboard flanges 34, which are welded or otherwise suitably attached to inboard flanges 32.
Seats 30, 30′ of rail 16 form a notch 36 receiving crush tube 18. As illustrated in
Mounting flanges 28, 28′ of rail 16 are attached to plate 20. In the illustrated embodiment, plate 20 is welded to mounting flanges 28, 28′ but can be otherwise suitably mounted to rail 16 as desired. As shown in
Referring back to
While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be understood, of course, that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only in terms of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4468052 | Koike | Aug 1984 | A |
5080410 | Stewart et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5803514 | Shibuya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829805 | Watson | Nov 1998 | A |
6068329 | Miller | May 2000 | A |
6089629 | Hope et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6176530 | Gollungberg | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179355 | Chou et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6334638 | Yamamuro et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6398275 | Hartel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428065 | Sato et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6485072 | Werner et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6652010 | Huddle et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6712411 | Gotanda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6854574 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7086674 | Goertz | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090267 | Pendarvis | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7201413 | Hillekes et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20020101085 | Gehringhoff et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20050179268 | Kollaritsch et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060043743 | Shuler et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070176443 | Yasuhara et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080079273 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |