Elevator systems include various types of drives for moving an elevator car among various landings. Traction drive systems utilize a roping arrangement for supporting the weight of the elevator car and a counterweight. A traction sheave is associated with a motor for moving the roping arrangement to cause desired movement of the elevator car. There are a variety of such configurations known in the art.
One approach includes having deflector sheaves supported on the elevator car such that the roping passes beneath the elevator car as it bends around those sheaves. Such an arrangement is typically called underslung because the sheaves and roping are beneath the floor of the elevator car. Examples of underslung elevator car arrangements are shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,931,265; 6,397,974; 6,443,266; 6,715,587 and 6,860,367. Another underslung arrangement is shown in the United States Patent Application Publication No. US 2006/0175140.
One challenge associated with utilizing an underslung arrangement is keeping the overall elevator car design compact to achieve space savings. For example, pit depth requirements are based, at least in part, on the configuration of the elevator car. It would be desirable to be able to achieve the benefits of more modern elevator car configurations while using an underslung arrangement without sacrificing the size benefits afforded by a more modern elevator car design.
With conventional arrangements, typical elevator cars include a frame structure and a separate cabin. Vibration isolating elements typically have been provided for mounting the cabin to the frame to achieve a desired ride quality. If an elevator system were to include a different elevator car design, the typical approach would no longer be available for achieving a desired level of vibration isolation. For example, if one were to use an integrated elevator car frame and cabin structure that are not manufactured separately, there would be no intermediate locations or vibration isolators between the cabin structure and the frame. If such an alternative elevator car structure were used, a new approach would be required for isolating sheave vibrations of an underslung configuration from the interior of the elevator cab.
An exemplary elevator system includes an elevator car having an integrated cabin and car frame structure including a platform thickness between a floor surface in the cabin and a lowermost surface on a support beam used for supporting the car beneath the floor surface. A sheave assembly is supported beneath the floor surface. The sheave assembly includes a plurality of sheaves and a plurality of subframe beams. The sheaves and subframe beams fit within the platform thickness such that the subframe beams and the sheaves are no lower than the lowermost surface on the support beam. A plurality of isolation members are between the sheave assembly and the elevator car for isolating an interior of the cabin from vibrations associated with movement of the sheaves.
The various features and advantages of the disclosed examples will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
A sheave assembly 24 is supported for movement with the elevator car 22. In this example, a plurality of deflector sheaves 26 direct a roping arrangement 28 to pass beneath the elevator car 22 as the elevator car 22 is suspended and moves within a hoistway, for example.
In the example of
In the example of
In this example, each subframe beam 40 includes a plurality of recesses 42. Each recess 42 is configured to at least partially receive an isolation member 34. In this example, the recesses 42 include reaction surfaces 44, 46 and 48. The example isolation members 34 are received against the reaction surfaces 44-48 to prevent relative movement between the sheave assembly 24 and the elevator car 22. The reaction surface 44 limits an amount of upward (according to the drawing) movement and the reaction surfaces 48 and 46 limit movement in a direction parallel to a length of the subframe beams 40 in this example.
As can be appreciated from
In the example of
As can be appreciated from
One feature of the example of
The example sheave assembly 24 is not completely free of the car 22 because the subframe beams 40 of the sheave assembly 24 are housed within the corresponding C-shaped plank support beams 50 that are, in turn, fastened to the bottom of the car 22. As a result, even if the car 22 is set on its safeties such that the car 22 is immobilized relative to a set of conventional guiding rails (i.e., so that the weight 22 of the car is supported by the rails and not by the roping arrangement 28), the sheave assembly 24 will not separate completely from the car 22, as the subframe beams 40 of the sheave assembly 24 will remain housed within the C-shaped plank support beams 50 fastened to the bottom of the car.
In this example, the isolation members 34 serve to limit movement of the sheave assembly 24 in three directions along three distinct, perpendicular axes (e.g., up and down, side-to-side and front-to-back). The illustrated example provides an efficient way of maintaining a desired position of the sheave assembly 24 relative to the elevator car 22. Additionally, the isolating members 34 minimize any vibrations associated with movement of the sheaves 26 from being transferred to an interior of the cabin of the elevator car 22. The unique mounting arrangement also allows for the sheave assembly 24 to fit within the platform thickness T of the elevator car 22.
Another feature of the illustrated example is that the sheaves 26 are arranged so that they include a spacing 64 between at least two of the sheaves. The spacing 64 accommodates a guide rail along which the elevator car moves. This allows for less space to be occupied compared to other arrangements where there is no overlap in the positioning of the guide rail surfaces and the sheave surfaces.
The example sheave assembly 24 is suspended beneath the elevator car 22 by the weight of the car and the roping arrangement (not specifically illustrated in
Referring to
Another feature of this example arrangement is that the elongated shape of the rods 72 is different than the generally C-shaped cross-section of the support beams 50 and other structural members of the elevator car 22. The difference in the physical shape of the rods 72 provides a vibration impedance mismatch at the interface between the sheave assembly 24 and the structure of the elevator car 22. This impedance mismatch further limits any noise or vibration transfer into the interior of the cab of the elevator car 22.
One feature of the disclosed examples is that the ability to nest the sheave assembly 24 within the car frame structural dimensions allows for realizing an underslung elevator car arrangement that does not increase the platform thickness of the car frame structure. This provides the feature of obtaining space savings and does not require an increase in the size of a pit at a bottom of a hoistway, for example. The illustrated examples also provide an economical arrangement for positioning a sheave assembly beneath an elevator car while isolating an interior of an elevator cabin from vibrations that may be associated with movement of the sheaves of the sheave assembly.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/067195 | 6/17/2008 | WO | 00 | 11/3/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/154611 | 12/23/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3101130 | Bianca | Aug 1963 | A |
5199529 | Salmon | Apr 1993 | A |
5613667 | Ho | Mar 1997 | A |
6305502 | He et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6640935 | Murakami et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
7543685 | Ach et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20030102613 | Alves | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040173411 | Silberhorn et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050006180 | Mustalahti et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060070819 | Schaffhauser et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060175140 | Kolb et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080099285 | Det et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090057070 | Maury | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100126808 | Hashiguchi | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101074079 | Nov 2007 | CN |
60244787 | Dec 1985 | JP |
2001122564 | May 2001 | JP |
2001247278 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002128428 | May 2002 | JP |
2003227545 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2005001773 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006151634 | Jun 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2008/067195 mailed Dec. 29, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US2008/067195 mailed Mar. 12, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110056770 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |