The present disclosure relates to reduction of noise in noisy underwater environments including sea-faring vessels, oil rigs and other industrial and military applications.
Some human activities cause underwater noise that is transmitted from the source of the underwater noise to the surrounding environment, sometimes many miles away. The underwater noise generated by oil and gas drilling platforms, ships and other human activities and machinery is generally considered undesirable. Some studies conclude that underwater noise pollution can adversely affect marine life, and it may be disruptive to other human activities such as scientific, meteorological and military activities. This is especially true for noise generating activities that result in large amplitude acoustic emissions (loud sounds) and transmissions at frequencies to which human and oceanic life is sensitive.
Ships that operate in environmentally sensitive or highly regulated regions can be limited in the manner or time in which they can operate due to the noise generated by the ship. This occurs in the oil and gas field, where noise from mobile drilling ships limits drilling time due to the effect that the noise can have on migrating bowhead whales in Arctic regions. When bowhead whales are sighted, operations may be halted until they have safely passed, and this process can take many hours.
As mentioned above, there is some concern over the effect that shipping and other man-made noise has on marine mammals. Some studies suggest that man-made noise can have a significant impact on the whale's stress hormone levels, which might affect their reproduction rates, etc.
Known attempts to reduce noise emissions from surface ships include the use of a so-called Prairie Masker, which uses bands of hoses that produce small freely-rising bubbles to mitigate ship's noise. However, small freely-rising bubbles are usually too small to effectively attenuate low-frequency noise. In addition, Prairie Masker systems require continuous pumping of air through the system, a process itself that produces unwanted noise, and also consuming energy and requiring a complex gas circulation system that is costly and cumbersome to the other operations of the ship. Finally, such systems cannot operate below a given depth due to hydraulic forces and back pressures.
One principle that is useful in approximating or understanding the acoustic effects of gas pockets in liquid (e.g., air pockets or bubbles or enclosures in water) is the behavior of spherical gas bubbles in liquid. The physics of gas bubbles is relatively well known and has been studied theoretically, experimentally and numerically.
Continuing efforts to mitigate the effects of underwater noise continue. While some solutions can actually reduce the amount of noise generated by a source other solutions seek to reduce the effect of the noise by surrounding or partially surrounding the noise-making source with something that absorbs or otherwise attenuates the propagated noise.
The present disclosure is directed to reduction of the severity of noise emissions from the vicinity of a noise generating object or activity. The present concepts can be applied to man-made noise but also more generally to any noise generated from a source under water (e.g., in the seas, coastal areas, drilling fields, lake beds, and so on).
Gas trapped in the pockets under or around an object in the water can act as free bubbles and/or Helmholtz-like resonators and thus work to abate noise in much the same way as a resonant bubble. To give an example of how this would work in on a ship, a panel with hemispherical, cylindrical, conical (or similar shape) cavities could be attached to its hull, and while submerged the pockets could be filled with gas via an external mechanism or an internal manifold system. The properties of these pockets would be chosen so that the gas trapped within each pocket resonates at or near the frequencies that we wish to attenuate (e.g., between about 30 Hz to about 200 Hz including about 110 Hz), thus maximizing their efficacy. For the example of pile driving, sheets or panels containing a plurality of these resonators can be deployed to fully surround the whetted portion of the pile. As in the previous example, the properties of the pockets would be chosen to maximize the efficacy of the system.
The system is customizable and can attenuate noise to the amount desired (e.g., 10 dB or more). The system can also be produced to specifically target frequencies that are particularly loud. In other aspects, the present invention provides added thermoacoustic absorption of sound by selective application of a permeable mesh over an open end of the resonator.
In an aspect, the system includes a resonator with articulated sidewalls that reduce a length of the resonator in a storage configuration. In another aspect, the system includes resonators that are stackable in a storage configuration to reduce space during transportation, storage, and stowage on board a pile-driving vessel, for example. In yet another aspect, the system includes a first resonator in fluid communication with a second resonator through a conduit. The first resonator can receive a gas through an inlet where the gas can fill the interior volume of the first resonator and the second resonator through the conduit.
This system may allow the operator to work for longer periods of time and in areas previously unavailable due to noise regulations. This system is also much more effective at reducing noise than current technology because each gas cavity is built so that the gas trapped inside will maximally reduce the targeted underwater noise. In addition it does not require power or expensive support equipment.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and advantages of the present concepts, reference is made to the following detailed description of preferred embodiments and in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Gas trapped in the pockets under or around an object in the water can act as free bubbles and/or like Helmholtz (or similar) resonators (e.g., Minnaert resonators and/or Church resonators) and thus work to abate noise in much the same way as a resonant bubble.
The height of the interior volume of the cavity and its volume are configurable to suit the purpose at hand. The hydrostatic pressure around the resonators varies with depth below the surface, the cavities' size and/or shape can vary according to their location with respect to the water line on the face of the panel. Thus, the cavities may be designed to accommodate the change in water pressure felt at the neck of the cavities due to the depth to which they are submerged, as (in the analogy of
In some embodiments, a mesh or other solid screen such as a metal screen (e.g., copper screen) can be placed over the face of the panels. This can act to stabilize the air in the cavities. This can also act as a heat sink to dissipate thermal energy absorbed by the resonating volume of the cavity and potentially improve its performance.
In some embodiments a hemispherical or spherical section or spheroidal section cavity is suitable for damping noise in a useful frequency range.
As illustrated, the segmented sidewalls 230 are folded (e.g., similar to an accordion) in a first direction 260 to reduce a length of the segmented sidewalls 230 in a second direction 270. The second direction 270 is orthogonal to the first direction 260. It is noted, however, that other relative orientations of the first direction 260 and second direction 270 fall within the scope of the invention and are a matter of design choice. The segmented sidewalls 230 include a first sidewall 232 and a second sidewall 234. The first sidewall 232 is shorter than the second sidewall 234 to reduce the length of the segmented sidewalls 230 along the first direction 260. The first direction 260 can be parallel to the first sidewall 232 when the resonator 20 is in the collapsed or storage configuration. The first sidewall 232 can have an equal or greater length than the second sidewall 234 in some embodiments. The segmented sidewalls 230 can be formed of a rigid material or can have a rigid frame (e.g., aluminum) with a flexible material (e.g., neoprene) on the walls defined by the frame. Alternatively, the segmented sidewalls 230 can be a flexible material.
The resonator 20 in
As illustrated, the resonator 20 in
The resonator body 500 has an open end 520 and a closed end 530. The resonator body 500 is hollow and is generally tapered from the open end 520 to the closed end 530. The open end 520 has a first width (e.g., a diameter) 525 and the closed end 530 has a second width (e.g., a diameter) 535. As the resonator body 500 is shaped like a cone, the first width 525 is greater than the second width 535. In some embodiments, however, the first width 525 is less than the second width 535. Thus, in general, the first width 525 is not equal to the second width 535. The resonator body 500 can be formed of a rigid material or can have a rigid frame (e.g., aluminum) with a flexible material (e.g., neoprene) on the walls defined by the frame. Alternatively, the resonator body 500 can be formed from a flexible material. The resonator 500 can have an internal volume of about (i.e., within 10%) 220 cubic centimeters.
The first resonator 500A and the second resonator 500B have respective resonance frequencies, as discussed above. In some embodiments, the first resonator 500A has a first resonance frequency that is different than a second resonance frequency of the second resonator 500B. Alternatively, the first resonator 500A and the second resonator 500B can have the same or substantially the same (i.e., within 10%) resonance frequency. The resonance frequencies can be between about 30 Hz and about 200 Hz including about 110 Hz.
In some embodiments, one or more conduits 540A, 540B, 540N (referred to in general as conduit 540) are defined on or in the stackable resonator bodies 500A, 500B, 500N, respectively. A lower open end 502 of the conduit 540 (e.g., a spill hole) is disposed at or near the open end 520 of the resonator body 500. An upper open end 504 of the conduit 540 is disposed at or near the closed end 530 of the resonator body 500 and below the adjacent resonator 500. In operation, gas (e.g., air) bubbles into the open end 520 of the hollow resonator body 500N. The gas can be supplied from a gas source (e.g., a pressurized gas tank). The gas bubbles rise to the closed end 530 of the hollow resonator body 500N and then fill the hollow resonator body 500N from the closed end 530 to the open end 520 thereof. When the hollow resonator body 500N is filled with gas, the gas is at or near the open end 520 of the hollow resonator body 500N. The gas then flows into the conduit 540N on the resonator body 500N from the lower open end 502 to the upper open end 504 of the conduit 540N. The gas then bubbles into the next resonator body 500B immediately above resonator body 500N. The same process can repeat until all resonator bodies 500 along a vertical axis are filled with gas.
A conduit 630 connects adjacent resonators 600 (through respective first ends 610) along a vertical direction as illustrated in
The first resonator 600A and the second resonator 600B have respective resonance frequencies, as discussed above. In some embodiments, the first resonator 600A has a first resonance frequency that is different than a second resonance frequency of the second resonator 600B. Alternatively, the first resonator 600A and the second resonator 600B can have the same or substantially the same (i.e., within 10%) resonance frequency. The resonators 600 across the array can be the same, substantially the same, or different than each other.
In operation, the gas (e.g., air) is pumped or otherwise introduced into the inlet 640 of the first resonator 600A through the manifold 650. The gas fills the hollow body of the first resonator 600A and displaces the fluid (e.g., water) in the hollow body. The fluid flows through the conduit 630 to the second resonator 600B. Alternatively, the fluid flows through a vent or valve in the first end 610 of the first resonator 600A. After the gas creates a threshold pressure in the first resonator 600A, the gas displaces the fluid in the conduit 630 and in the second resonator 600B thus filling the second resonator 600B with the gas. This process continues for the Y conduits 600 in the vertical direction (i.e., through resonators 600C, 600D, and 600E). In this orientation, the gas will naturally flow vertically towards a surface 35 of the water 25 due to the buoyancy of the gas. The fluid in the resonators 600A, 600B, etc. displaced by the gas can be expunged into the water 25 through a valve or similar means.
In some embodiments, a wall 720 of the resonator 700 is soft and/or flexible while the panel 710 is rigid. The soft and/or flexible wall 720 permits the resonator 700 to be collapsible during storage. For example, the panel 710 (which can include an array of resonators 700) can be stored by stacking multiple panels 710 on top of each other or by rolling the panel 710 around a drum. In either case, the panel 710 can be stored more efficiently and/or compactly if the wall 720 of the resonator 700 is collapsible.
This invention is not limited to use in surface or sub-surface ships and vessels, but may be used by oil and gas companies drilling in the ocean (e.g., on rigs and barges), offshore power generation activities (e.g., pile driving activities from the installation of wind farms), as well as in bridge and pier construction or any other manmade noise-producing structures.
As far as applications of the current system, one can prepare panels similar to those described above for attachment to submerged structures or vessels. The panels can include a plurality of gas (e.g., air) cavities where the buoyancy of the air in the water environment causes the air to remain within the cavities. The cavities can be filled by the act of inverted submersion (i.e., the open side of the resonator is oriented down towards the ocean floor) of the panels or structure. Alternatively, the cavities can be actively filled using an air source disposed beneath the cavities so that the air from the source can rise up into and then remain in the cavities. The cavities may need to be replenished with gas from time to time.
In some embodiments, gas other than air may be used to fill the cavities. The temperature of the gas in the cavities may also affect their performance and resonance frequencies, and so this can also be modified in some embodiments.
Many other designs can be developed for noise abatement and damping purposes. In other embodiments, the resonating cavity may be filled with a liquid fluid instead of a gas fluid. For example, if the system is to be operated at extreme depths in the ocean, a liquid other than water having a compressibility different than that of sea water could also be used, as would be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate upon review of the present disclosure that the ideas presented herein can be generalized, or particularized to a given application at hand. As such, this disclosure is not intended to be limited to the exemplary embodiments described, which are given for the purpose of illustration. Many other similar and equivalent embodiments and extensions of these ideas are also comprehended hereby. The claims are intended to cover such modifications.
The present application derives from and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/917,343, filed on Dec. 17, 2013, bearing the present title.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2528049 | Gonda | Oct 1950 | A |
2610695 | Grue | Sep 1952 | A |
3022632 | Parks | Feb 1962 | A |
3886491 | Jonkey et al. | May 1975 | A |
3975918 | Jansz | Aug 1976 | A |
4241806 | Metzger | Dec 1980 | A |
4300855 | Watson | Nov 1981 | A |
4505617 | Miller | Mar 1985 | A |
4548292 | Noxon | Oct 1985 | A |
5082084 | Ye-Ming | Jan 1992 | A |
5394786 | Gettle et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5457291 | Richardson | Oct 1995 | A |
5658656 | Whitney et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5959938 | Behrens | Sep 1999 | A |
6125965 | Wang | Oct 2000 | A |
6550574 | Liu | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567341 | Dreyer et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6571906 | Jones et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6698390 | Kostun | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6743367 | Dreyer | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6918740 | Liu | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6977109 | Wood | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7108457 | Brown | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7126875 | Baskerville et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7861804 | Haglund | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7896126 | Haberman et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7905323 | Larsen | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8276889 | Norris et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8387746 | Parkin | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8500369 | Mohr | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8636101 | Elmer | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8689935 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8794375 | Jung | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030006090 | Reed | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040146396 | Liu | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050083783 | Baskerville et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050167193 | Van Reeth | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070140518 | Larsen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070187174 | Mayor | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090145688 | Marcoux | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20110031062 | Elmer | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110186380 | Beauvilain et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120097476 | Jung et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120107054 | Baumfalk | May 2012 | A1 |
20120241039 | Jung et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130001010 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130056270 | Ward | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130111812 | Fisher | May 2013 | A1 |
20140208647 | Carpenter | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150078833 | Elmer | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150191987 | Wochner | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2657410 | Oct 2013 | EP |
WO2013102459 | Jul 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U. Ingard, “On the Theory and Design of Acoustic Resonators”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Nov. 1953, p. 1037-1061, vol. 25, No. 6. |
K. M. Lee et al., “Sound propagation in water containing large tethered spherical encapsulated gas bubbles with resonance frequencies in the 50 Hz to 100 Hz range”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Nov. 2011, p. 3325-3332, vol. 130, issue 5, pt. 2, Acoustical Society of America. |
K. M. Lee et al., “Mititgation of low-frequency underwater sound using large encapsulated bubbles and freely-rising bubble clouds”, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, May 2011, vol. 12, Acoustical Society of America through the American Institute of Physics. |
K. Lee et al., “Attenuation of low-frequency underwater sound using bubble resonance phenomena and acoustic impedance mismatching”, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Nov. 2010, vol. 11, Acoustical Society of America through the American Institute of Physics. |
US International Searching Authority, “International Search Report” May 22, 2015, WIPO. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150170631 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61917343 | Dec 2013 | US |