Uni-directional waste ink removal system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6454374
  • Patent Number
    6,454,374
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 31, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 24, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Vo; Anh T. N.
    • Hsieh; Shih-wen
    Agents
    • Miller; Christopher B.
Abstract
A uni-directional waste ink removal system cleans ink residue from an electrostatic sensing element of an ink drop detector in a printing mechanism when the electrostatic sensing element, supported by a base, is actuated between an activated position, a storage position, and back to the activated position. The system also includes a scraper and an absorber which first contact the sensing element when the base is in the storage position, thereby ensuring ink residue may be absorbed, and that ink residue is only scraped from the sensing element in one direction as the base is moved to the activated position. A method of cleaning ink residue from an electrostatic sensing element of an ink drop detector, and a printing mechanism having such a unidirectional waste ink removal system are also provided.
Description




INTRODUCTION




The present invention relates generally to printing mechanisms, such as inkjet printers or inkjet plotters. More particularly the present invention relates to a unidirectional waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue and debris from a target area of an ink drop detector in a printing mechanism.




Printing mechanisms often include an inkjet printhead which is capable of forming an image on many different types of media. The inkjet printhead ejects droplets of colored ink through a plurality of orifices and onto a given media as the media is advanced through a printzone. The printzone is defined by the plane created by the printhead orifices and any scanning or reciprocating movement the printhead may have back-and-forth and perpendicular to the movement of the media. Conventional methods for expelling ink from the printhead orifices, or nozzles, include piezo-electric and thermal techniques which are well-known to those skilled in the art. For instance, two earlier thermal ink ejection mechanisms are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,278,584 and 4,683,481, both assigned to the present assignee, Hewlett-Packard Company.




In a thermal system, a barrier layer containing ink channels and vaporization chambers is located between a nozzle orifice plate and a substrate layer. This substrate layer typically contains linear arrays of heater elements, such as resistors, which are individually addressable and energized to heat ink within the vaporization chambers. Upon heating, an ink droplet is ejected from a nozzle associated with the energized resistor. The inkjet printhead nozzles are typically aligned in one or more linear arrays substantially parallel to the motion of the print media as the media travels through the printzone. The length of the linear nozzle arrays defines the maximum height, or “swath” height of an imaged bar that would be printed in a single pass of the printhead across the media if all of the nozzles were fired simultaneously and continuously as the printhead was moved through the printzone above the media.




Typically, the print media is advanced under the inkjet printhead and held stationary while the printhead passes along the width of the media, firing its nozzles as determined by a controller to form a desired image on an individual swath, or pass. The print media is usually advanced between passes of the reciprocating inkjet printhead in order to avoid uncertainty in the placement of the fired ink droplets. If the entire printable data for a given swath is printed in one pass of the printhead, and the media is advanced a distance equal to the maximum swath height in-between printhead passes, then the printing mechanism will achieve its maximum throughput.




Often, however, it is desirable to print only a portion of the data for a given swath, utilizing a fraction of the available nozzles and advancing the media a distance smaller than the maximum swath height so that the same or a different fraction of nozzles may fill in the gaps in the desired printed image which were intentionally left on the first pass. This process of separating the printable data into multiple passes utilizing subsets of the available nozzles is referred to by those skilled in the art as “shingling,” “masking,” or using “print masks.” While the use of print masks does lower the throughput of a printing system, it can provide offsetting benefits when image quality needs to be balanced against speed. For example, the use of print masks allows large solid color areas to be filled in gradually, on multiple passes, allowing the ink to dry in parts and avoiding the large-area soaking and resulting ripples, or “cockle”, in the print media that a single pass swath would cause.




A printing mechanism may have one or more inkjet printheads, corresponding to one or more colors. For example, a typical inkjet printing system may have a single printhead with only black ink; or the system may have four printheads, one each with black, cyan, magenta, and yellow inks; or the system may have three printheads, one each with cyan, magenta, and yellow inks. Of course, there are many more combinations and quantities of possible printheads in inkjet printing systems, including seven and eight ink/printhead systems.




Each process color ink is ejected onto the print media in such a way that the drop size, relative position of the ink drops, and color of a small, discreet number of process inks are integrated by the naturally occurring visual response of the human eye to produce the effect of a large colorspace with millions of discernable colors and the effect of a nearly continuous tone. In fact, when these imaging techniques are performed properly by those skilled in the art, near-photographic quality images can be obtained on a variety of print media using only three to eight colors of ink.




This high level of image quality depends on many factors, several of which include: consistent and small ink drop size, consistent ink drop trajectory from the printhead nozzle to the print media, and extremely reliable inkjet printhead nozzles which do not clog.




To this end, many inkjet printing mechanisms contain a service station for the maintenance of the inkjet printheads. These service stations may include wipers, ink-solvent applicators, primers, and caps to help keep the nozzles from drying out during periods of inactivity. Additionally, inkjet printing mechanisms often contain service algorithms which are designed to fire ink out of each of the nozzles and into a waste spittoon in order to prevent nozzle clogging.




Despite these preventative measures, however, there are many factors at work within the typical inkjet printing mechanism which may clog the inkjet nozzles, and inkjet nozzle failures may occur. For example, paper dust may collect on the nozzles and eventually clog them. Ink residue from ink aerosol or partially clogged nozzles may be spread by service station printhead wipers into open nozzles, causing them to be clogged. Accumulated precipitates from the ink inside of the printhead may also occlude the ink channels and the nozzles. Additionally, the heater elements in a thermal inkjet printhead may fail to energize, despite the lack of an associated clogged nozzle, thereby causing the nozzle to fail.




Clogged printhead nozzles result in objectionable and easily noticeable print quality defects such as banding (visible bands of different hues or colors in what would otherwise be a uniformly colored area) or voids in the image. In fact, inkjet printing systems are so sensitive to clogged nozzles, that a single clogged nozzle out of hundreds of nozzles is often noticeable and objectionable in the printed output.




It is possible, however, for an inkjet printing system to compensate for a missing nozzle by removing it from the printing mask and replacing it with an unused nozzle or a used nozzle on a later, overlapping pass, provided the inkjet system has a way to tell when a particular nozzle is not functioning. In order to detect whether an inkjet printhead nozzle is firing, a printing mechanism may be equipped with a number of different ink drop detector systems.




One type of ink drop detector system utilizes a piezoelectric target surface that produces a measurable signal when ink droplets contact the target surface. Unfortunately, however, this type of technology is expensive and often is unable to detect the extremely small drops of ink used in inkjet printing systems with photographic image quality.




Another type of ink drop detector utilizes an optical sensor which forms a measurable signal when an ink droplet passes through a light beam from a sensory circuit. Unfortunately, this method is subject to extremely tight alignment tolerances which are difficult and expensive to setup and maintain. Additionally, an optical ink drop detection system is susceptible to the ink aerosol which results from the firing of the inkjet printhead inside of the printing mechanism. The aerosol coats the optical sensor over time, degrading the optical sensor signal and eventually preventing the optical sensor from functioning.




A more effective solution for ink drop detection is to use a low cost ink drop detection system, such as the one described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,190 assigned to the present assignee, the Hewlett-Packard Company. This drop detection system utilizes an electrostatic sensing element which is imparted with an electrical stimulus when struck by a series of ink drop bursts ejected from an inkjet printhead. The electrostatic sensing element may be made sufficiently large so that printhead alignment is not critical, and the sensing element may function with amounts of ink or aerosol on the sensing element surface which would incapacitate other types of drop detection sensors.




In practical implementation, however, this electrostatic sensing element has some limitations. First, successive drops of ink, drying on top of one another quickly form stalagmites of dried ink which may grow toward the printhead. Since it is preferable to have the electrostatic sensing element very close to the printhead for more accurate readings, these stalagmites may eventually interfere with or permanently damage the printhead, adversely affecting print quality. Second, as the ink residue dries, it remains conductive and may short out the drop detector electronics as the ink residue grows and spreads. Thus, this dried residue impairs the ability of the sensor to measure the presence of drops properly.




Thus, it would be desirable to have a method and mechanism for effectively removing the waste ink residue from an electrostatic ink drop detector in an inkjet printing mechanism.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to one aspect of the present invention, a waste ink removal system is provided for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop detection sensor in a printing mechanism. The waste ink removal system includes a frame, a base which supports the sensor and which is slideably supported by the frame, and an actuator which moves the base between an activated position and a storage position. The waste ink removal system also includes an absorber pivotally supported by the frame, to selectively contact the sensor and remove ink residue therefrom when the sensor is in the storage position. The waste ink removal system additionally includes a scraper pivotally supported by the frame to scrape ink residue from the sensor as the base moves from the storage position to the activated position.




According to another aspect of the present invention, a printing mechanism may be provided with a waste ink removal system as described above.




According to a further aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop detection sensor in a printing mechanism. The method includes transitioning the sensor from a storage position to an activated position, thereafter, depositing ink on the sensor and accumulating ink residue thereon. The method thereafter includes retracting the sensor to the storage position, and thereafter, absorbing the ink residue from the sensor. Finally, the method includes, returning the sensor from the storage position to the activated position.




One goal of the present invention is to provide a unidirectional waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from the sensing element of an electrostatic ink drop detector to prevent ink build-up on the sensor from contacting and thereby damaging the printheads, as well as to ensure a clean sensor surface to enable accurate drop detection readings that can be used to provide consumers with a reliable, economical inkjet printing unit.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a fragmented perspective view of one form of an inkjet printing mechanism, here including a service station having an electrostatic ink drop detector with a uni-directional waste ink removal system.





FIG. 2

is an enlarged perspective view of the service station from FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is an enlarged side elevational view of the service station of

FIG. 1

shown with an inkjet printhead firing ink onto an electrostatic ink drop detector.





FIGS. 4-7

are enlarged, fragmented side elevational views of the service station of

FIG. 1

, specifically with:





FIG. 4

showing a scraper lifting as the electrostatic ink drop detector moves towards the unidirectional waste ink removal system;





FIG. 5

showing the electrostatic ink drop detector moving below the scraper of the unidirectional waste ink removal system;





FIG. 6

showing an absorber in contact with the electrostatic ink drop detector; and





FIG. 7

showing the scraper performing a unidirectional scraping of the electrostatic ink drop detector.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

illustrates an embodiment of a printing mechanism, here shown as an inkjet printer


20


, constructed in accordance with the present invention, which may be used for printing on a variety of media, such as paper, transparencies, coated media, cardstock, photo quality papers, and envelopes in an industrial, office, home or other environment. A variety of inkjet printing mechanisms are commercially available. For instance, some of the printing mechanisms that may embody the concepts described herein include desk top printers, portable printing units, wide-format printers, hybrid electrophotographic-inkjet printers, copiers, cameras, video printers, and facsimile machines, to name a few. For convenience the concepts introduced herein are described in the environment of an inkjet printer


20


.




While it is apparent that the printer components may vary from model to model, the typical inkjet printer


20


includes a chassis


22


surrounded by a frame or casing enclosure


24


, typically of a plastic material. The printer


20


also has a printer controller, illustrated schematically as a microprocessor


26


, that receives instructions from a host device, such as a computer or personal data assistant (PDA) (not shown). A screen coupled to the host device may also be used to display visual information to an operator, such as the printer status or a particular program being run on the host device. Printer host devices, such as computers and PDA's, their input devices, such as a keyboards, mouse devices, stylus devices, and output devices such as liquid crystal display screens and monitors are all well known to those skilled in the art.




A conventional print media handling system (not shown) may be used to advance a sheet of print media (not shown) from the media input tray


28


through a printzone


30


and to an output tray


31


. A carriage guide rod


32


is mounted to the chassis


22


to define a scanning axis


34


, with the guide rod


32


slideably supporting an inkjet carriage


36


for travel back and forth, reciprocally, across the printzone


30


. A conventional carriage drive motor (not shown) may be used to propel the carriage


36


in response to a control signal received from the controller


26


. To provide carriage positional feedback information to controller


26


, a conventional encoder strip (not shown) may be extended along the length of the printzone


30


and over a servicing region


38


. A conventional optical encoder reader may be mounted on the back surface of printhead carriage


36


to read positional information provided by the encoder strip, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,276,970, also assigned to the Hewlett-Packard Company, the present assignee. The manner of providing positional feedback information via the encoder strip reader, may also be accomplished in a variety of ways known to those skilled in the art.




In the printzone


30


, the media sheet receives ink from an inkjet cartridge, such as a black ink cartridge


40


and a color inkjet cartridge


42


. The cartridges


40


and


42


are also often called “pens” by those in the art. The black ink pen


40


is illustrated herein as containing a pigment-based ink. For the purposes of illustration, color pen


42


is described as containing three separate dye-based inks which are colored cyan, magenta, and yellow, although it is apparent that the color pen


42


may also contain pigment-based inks in some implementations. It is apparent that other types of inks may also be used in the pens


40


and


42


, such as paraffin-based inks, as well as hybrid or composite inks having both dye and pigment characteristics. The illustrated printer


20


uses replaceable printhead cartridges where each pen has a reservoir that carries the entire ink supply as the printhead reciprocates over the printzone


30


. As used herein, the term “pen” or “cartridge” may also refer to an “off-axis” ink delivery system, having main stationary reservoirs (not shown) for each ink (black, cyan, magenta, yellow, or other colors depending on the number of inks in the system) located in an ink supply region. In an off-axis system, the pens may be replenished by ink conveyed through a conventional flexible tubing system from the stationary main reservoirs which are located “off-axis” from the path of printhead travel, so only a small ink supply is propelled by carriage


36


across the printzone


30


. Other ink delivery or fluid delivery systems may also employ the systems described herein, such as “snapper” cartridges which have ink reservoirs that snap onto permanent or semi-permanent print heads.




The illustrated black pen


40


has a printhead


44


, and color pen


42


has a tri-color printhead


46


which ejects cyan, magenta, and yellow inks. The printheads


44


,


46


selectively eject ink to form an image on a sheet of media when in the printzone


30


. The printheads


44


,


46


each have an orifice plate with a plurality of nozzles formed therethrough in a manner well known to those skilled in the art. The nozzles of each printhead


44


,


46


are typically formed in at least one, but typically two linear arrays along the orifice plate. Thus, the term “linear” as used herein may be interpreted as “nearly linear” or substantially linear, and may include nozzle arrangements slightly offset from one another, for example, in a zigzag arrangement. Each linear array is typically aligned in a longitudinal direction perpendicular to the scanning axis


34


, with the length of each array determining the maximum image swath for a single pass of the printhead. The printheads


44


,


46


are thermal inkjet printheads, although other types of printheads may be used, such as piezoelectric printheads. The thermal printheads


44


,


46


typically include a plurality of resistors which are associated with the nozzles. Upon energizing a selected resistor, a bubble of gas is formed which ejects a droplet of ink from the nozzle and onto the print media when in the printzone


30


under the nozzle. The printhead resistors are selectively energized in response to firing command control signals delivered from the controller


26


to the printhead carriage


36


.




Between print jobs, the inkjet carriage


36


moves along the carriage guide rod


32


to the servicing region


38


where a service station


48


may perform various servicing functions known to those in the art, such as, priming, scraping, and capping for storage during periods of non-use to prevent ink from drying and clogging the inkjet printhead nozzles.





FIG. 2

shows the service station


48


in detail. A service station frame


50


is mounted to the chassis


22


, and houses a moveable pallet


52


. The moveable pallet


52


may be driven by a motor (not shown) to move in the frame


50


in the positive and negative Y-axis directions. The moveable pallet


52


may be driven by a rack and pinion gear powered by the service station motor in response to the microprocessor


26


according to methods known by those skilled in the art. An example of such a rack and pinion system in an inkjet cleaning service station can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,980,018, assigned to the Hewlett-Packard Company, also the current assignee. The end result is that pallet


52


may be moved in the positive Y-axis direction to a servicing position and in the negative Y-axis direction to an uncapped position. The pallet


52


supports a black printhead cap


54


and a tricolor printhead cap


56


to seal the printheads


44


and


46


, respectively, when the moveable pallet


52


is in the servicing position, here a capping position.





FIG. 2

also shows an ink drop detector system


58


supported by the service station frame


50


. Clearly, the ink drop detector system


58


could be mounted in other locations along the printhead scanning axis


34


, including the right side of the service station frame


50


, inside the service station


48


, or the opposite end of the printer from the service station


48


, for example. However, the illustrated location of the ink drop detector


58


is the preferred location, and will be used to illustrate the preferred principles of manufacture and operation, although other locations may be more suitable in other implementations.




The ink drop detector


58


has a printed circuitboard assembly (PCA)


60


which is supported by a PCA carrier


62


. The PCA carrier


62


is slideably supported by carrier guide arms


64


and the service station frame


50


which allows the PCA carrier


62


, freedom of movement in positive and negative Y-axis directions. The PCA


60


has a conductive electrostatic sensing element


66


, or “target” on the upper surface toward which ink droplets may be fired and detected according to the apparatus and method described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,190, assigned to the Hewlett-Packard Company, the present assignee. The PCA


60


contains various electronics (not shown) for filtering and amplification of drop detection signals received from the target


66


. A flex cable


68


and an electrical conductor


70


link the ink drop detector


58


to controller


26


for drop detection signal processing. The ink drop detector system


58


also has an associated uni-directional waste ink removal system


71


.




A scraper arm


72


is pivotally attached to a scraper pivot post


74


which projects outwardly from the service station frame


50


. The scraper arm supports an absorbing member, such as absorber


76


and a scraper member, such as scraper


78


. The absorber


76


is preferably constructed of fibrous medium and may be sized for the required life of the ink drop detector


58


. A torsion spring


80


is connected between the service station frame


50


and the scraper arm


72


, to bias the scraper arm


72


towards the PCA carrier


62


in the negative Z-axis direction.




Movement is preferably imparted to the PCA carrier


62


through translation of the moveable pallet


52


as the pallet


52


moves from the uncapped position shown in

FIG. 3

to the capped position shown in FIG.


6


.

FIGS. 3-7

show a front moveable pallet arm


82


and a rear moveable pallet arm


84


which protrude outwardly from the moveable pallet


52


on the side of the pallet


52


adjacent to the PCA carrier


62


. A PCA carrier leg


86


, which is integral to the PCA carrier


62


, protrudes inwardly towards the moveable pallet


52


. The rear moveable pallet arm


84


is sized and positioned to engage the PCA carrier leg


86


as the moveable pallet


52


is moved from the uncapped position of

FIG. 3

to the capped position of FIG.


6


. Thus, the PCA carrier


62


may be moved in the positive Y-axis direction when the rear moveable pallet arm


84


engages the carrier leg


86


. When the PCA carrier


62


finishes traveling in the positive Y-axis direction, the PCA carrier


62


is said to be in a storage position.




The moveable pallet


52


may then be moved oppositely, in the negative Y-axis direction. When this pallet


52


movement begins, the PCA carrier


62


remains stationary until the front moveable pallet arm


82


contacts the carrier leg


86


. Once this contact occurs, the PCA carrier


62


moves with the pallet


52


in the negative Y-axis direction. When the PCA carrier


62


finishes traveling in the negative Y-axis direction, the PCA carrier


62


is said to be in an activated position, ready for sensing.




While the preferred method of actuating the PCA carrier


62


is through the above-described translation of moveable pallet


52


, it should be apparent that other structural equivalents may be substituted to act as the actuator for the PCA carrier


62


, including, for example, a solenoid or a motor which operate in response to the controller


26


.




While the moveable pallet


52


is in the uncapped position, the PCA carrier


62


is in the activated position. While the PCA carrier


62


is in the activated position, the electrostatic sensing target


66


is positioned so that the inkjet carriage


36


may be moved along the carriage guide rod


32


until one or more of the printheads


44


,


46


are positioned directly over the electrostatic sensing target


66


. For illustration purposes, the tri-color printhead


46


is shown positioned over target


66


in

FIG. 3

, although it is apparent that either of the printheads


44


,


46


may be positioned over the target


62


either one at a time or in various simultaneous combinations if allowed by the size of the target


66


, the size of each printhead, and the spacing between the printheads.




The preferred spacing between the printheads


44


,


46


and the target


66


is on the order of two millimeters, although other spacings may be more desirable in different implementations. Once the printhead


46


is properly aligned with the target


66


, the controller


26


causes ink droplets


88


to be fired from printhead


46


onto the target


66


. An electrical drop detect signal is generated by the ink droplets


88


as they contact the target


66


, and this signal is captured by the electronics of PCA


60


. The drop detect signal is then analyzed by controller


26


to determine whether or not various nozzles of printhead


46


are spitting ink properly or whether they are clogged. A preferred method of analyzing signals from an electrostatic target ink drop detector is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,190, also assigned to the present assignee, the Hewlett-Packard Company. A clogged nozzle may be purged by spitting ink into a spittoon portion


89


defined by the service station frame


50


. Following a spitting routine, further drop detection by sensor


58


may determine that the nozzle is permanently clogged or otherwise damaged. Based on the determination made by the controller


26


as to whether each nozzle is functioning properly, the controller


26


may adjust the print masks to substitute functioning nozzles for any malfunctioning nozzles to provide consistent high-quality printed output while still using a printhead with permanently clogged nozzles.




In order to ensure that a reliable measurement may be made by the ink drop detector system


58


, it is desirable to remove ink residue from the target


66


after a measurement or series of measurements have been made to prevent excessive deposits of dried ink from accumulating on the surface of target


66


. Dried ink deposits remain conductive and may short circuit some of the electronics on PCA


60


if allowed to build-up and spread over time, thereby degrading the ability of the ink drop detector


58


to make measurements. Additionally, dried ink deposits may accumulate over time to form stalagmites which eventually grow to interfere with the printheads


44


,


46


, possibly damaging nozzles which hit the stalagmites, a process known as “stalagmite crashes.”




Accordingly, a mechanism is provided to lift the scraper arm


72


, including the attached scraper


78


and the absorber


76


, as the PCA carrier


62


is moved to the storage position by the moveable pallet


52


, as shown in

FIGS. 4-5

. The PCA carrier


62


has a lifter


90


which protrudes upwardly from the front end of the PCA carrier


62


nearest to the scraper arm


72


. The scraper arm


72


has a cam follower support


92


which protrudes downwardly from the scraper arm


72


. The cam follower support


92


is preferably positioned on the scraper arm


72


between the absorber


76


and the scraper pivot


74


, but nearest to the absorber


76


for increased mechanical advantage. As the PCA carrier


62


is moved towards the storage position, a forward surface


93


of the lifter


90


, integral to the PCA carrier


62


, is brought into interference with the cam follower support


92


. As a result, the scraper arm


72


is lifted as shown in

FIG. 4

to allow the target


66


to pass freely thereunder as shown in FIG.


5


.




A cam wall


94


is also integrally formed as a continuous part of the PCA carrier


62


. The cam wall


94


protrudes upwardly from the PCA carrier


62


in the positive Z-axis direction and is located on the side of the PCA carrier


62


facing towards the service station frame


50


. The cam wall


94


is also sized in thickness to fit between the service station frame


50


and the absorber


76


. On the side of the cam wall


94


facing the absorber


76


, a cam


96


protrudes from the cam wall


94


. This cam


96


does not interfere with the absorber


76


. The cam wall


94


, and therefore also the cam


96


, move in unison with the PCA carrier


62


.




As the PCA carrier


62


continues to move in the positive Y-axis direction, towards the storage position, a cam follower


98


on the scraper arm


72


, shown in

FIG. 4

, is transferred to the cam


96


by the lifting motion of scraper arm


72


created by the above-described interference between the lifter


90


and the cam follower support


92


. Since the torsion spring


80


is biasing the scraper arm


72


in the negative Z-axis direction, the cam follower


98


rides along an upper cam surface


100


of cam


96


as the cam wall


94


is moved in the positive Y-axis direction. As the cam follower


98


travels along the upper cam surface


100


, the electrostatic sensing target


66


is being positioned beneath the raised scraper


78


and absorber


76


, as shown in FIG.


5


.




When the PCA carrier


62


reaches the storage position, the cam follower


98


clears the upper cam surface


100


and the scraper


78


pivots counterclockwise under forces provided by gravity and the torsion spring


80


, into contact with the PCA


60


, as shown in FIG.


6


. With the scraper


78


in contact with the PCA


60


, while the PCA carrier


62


is in the storage position, the absorber


76


is in overlapping contact with the electrostatic sensing target


66


. This allows the absorber


76


to absorb ink which has been deposited on the target


66


.




A printer control routine used by controller


26


is preferably adjusted to perform ink drop detection measurements just prior to capping. The immediately following process of moving the pallet


52


into the capping position, and therefore the PCA carrier


62


into the storage position, allows the absorber


76


to soak-up the ink residue from the target


66


while the ink is still wet. The waste ink is absorbed through capillary action, thereby minimizing the possibility that stalagmites or dried ink may form on the target


66


.




The target


66


remains in contact with the absorber


76


while the printheads


44


,


46


are sealed by caps


54


,


56


, allowing time for any wet ink which is present on the target


66


to be pulled into the absorber


76


. In fact, prototype testing of the illustrated absorber


76


has shown that ink deposited on the absorber


76


through contact with the target


66


flows under capillary action throughout the absorber


76


. Thus, the size of the absorber


76


may be designed to hold various volumes of ink, and preferably, enough ink to last at least over the expected lifetime of the printer


20


.




Despite efforts to remove the ink residue from the target


66


while it is still wet, dried ink debris may still be formed on target


66


. To remove this dried ink debris, which the absorber


76


is not able to absorb, the scraper


78


is employed when the pallet


52


is moved to the uncapped position. While uncapping, the pallet


52


moves in the negative Y-axis direction, as shown in FIG.


7


. The front moveable pallet arm


82


contacts the PCA carrier leg


86


, which then moves the PCA carrier


62


in the negative Y-axis direction. The electrostatic sensing target


66


is thereby scraped by scraper


78


, as shown in

FIG. 7

, as the PCA carrier


62


moves toward the activated position. During this move, the scraper stays in contact with the PCA


60


and the target


66


due to the downward bias from torsion spring


80


. As the PCA carrier


62


moves to the activated position, the cam follower


98


passes clear of and below cam


96


.




The scraper


78


and absorber


76


were lifted, and therefore not in contact with the target


66


, when the PCA carrier


62


was moved to the storage position. Thus, the scraping action between scraper


78


and target


66


as the PCA carrier


62


is moved to the activated position ensures that the target is only scraped in one single direction. As the PCA carrier


62


moves to the activated position, cam follower


98


passes below a lower cam surface


101


of cam


96


.




This uni-directional scraping system


71


provides a way to keep previously scraped ink debris, lodged on scraper


78


, from being redeposited by the scraper


78


onto the target


66


as would be the case if the scraper arm


72


was never lifted. If the scraper arm


72


was never lifted, ink debris would accumulate on one side of the scraper


78


as the PCA carrier


62


moved to the storage position. Since the debris would have accumulated on the side of the scraper


78


where the target


66


would move to when the PCA carrier


62


returned to the activated position, the debris might be redeposited onto the target


66


during this second scraping in the opposite direction. Thus, this uni-directional scraping system


71


is preferred to maintain target cleanliness and promote consistent, reliable drop detection.




As the PCA carrier


62


nears the completely activated position, the lifter surface


102


of lifter


90


contacts the cam follower support surface


104


of the cam follower support


92


. Since the lifter surface


102


and the cam follower support surface


104


are interfering, the cam follower support


92


is forced up and into the position shown in FIG.


4


. This is possible because the scraper arm


72


is free to pivot on pivot post


74


. As the PCA carrier


62


completes its move to the active position, the lifter


90


pulls away from the cam follower support


92


, allowing the scraper arm


72


to lower due to gravity and the downward force provided by the torsion spring


80


. The target


66


clears the scraper


78


prior to this lifting and lowering of the scraper arm


72


. Now, the target


66


, free of ink residue and debris, is in the activated position, as shown in

FIG. 3

, to take another ink drop detection measurement.




At all times while the printheads


44


,


46


are uncapped, this uni-directional waste ink removal system


71


provides clearance for the inkj et carriage


36


to move along carriage guide rod


32


and into the printzone


30


for printing. Using information from the ink drop detector measurements, print masks may be adjusted by controller


26


to replace clogged nozzles for optimum image quality.




A uni-directional waste ink removal system


71


, used in conjunction with an electrostatic ink drop detector


58


, provides the ability to remove ink residue from the target


66


before it dries. A uni-directional waste ink removal system


71


also provides the ability to remove dried-ink buildup before it has a chance to form stalagmites, thereby preventing damage to the printheads


44


,


46


. Additionally, a uni-directional waste ink removal system


71


provides the ability to remove dried ink residue in a consistent, single direction, thus preventing debris previously scraped off of the electrostatic sensing target


66


by scraper


78


from being redeposited on the target


66


as it moves into position for a new measurement. Therefore, a uni-directional waste ink removal system


71


enables a printing mechanism to reliably use ink drop detection readings to provide users with consistent, high-quality, and economical inkjet output despite printheads


44


,


46


which may clog over time. In discussing various components of the unidirectional waste ink removal system


71


, ink drop detector system


58


, and the service station


48


, various benefits have been noted above.




It is apparent that a variety of other modifications and substitutions may be made to construct a uni-directional waste ink removal system depending upon the particular implementation, while still falling within the scope of the claims below.



Claims
  • 1. A waste ink removal system for cleaning residue from an ink drop detection sensor in a printing mechanism, comprising:a frame; a carrier which supports the sensor and which is slideably supported by the frame; an actuator which moves the carrier between an activated position and a storage position; an absorber pivotally supported by the frame, to selectively contact the sensor and remove ink residue therefrom when the sensor is in the storage position; and a scraper pivotally supported by the frame to scrape ink residue from the sensor as the carrier moves from the storage position to the activated position.
  • 2. A waste ink removal system according to claim 1 wherein the actuator comprises an inkjet printhead servicing member which moves between a first position and a second position.
  • 3. A waste ink removal system according to claim 2 further comprising:a scraper arm pivotally supported by the frame, which supports the scraper and the absorber; and a spring member, connected between the fame and the scraper arm to bias the scraper arm in a direction to allow the scraper and the absorber to interfere with the carrier.
  • 4. A waste ink removal system according to claim 3 wherein:the scraper arm further comprises a cam follower; the carrier further comprises a cam which lifts the scraper arm through contact between the cam follower and the cam while the carrier moves from the storage position to the activated position; the cam follower clears the cam as the carrier reaches the storage position, while the spring member pivots the absorber into contact with the sensing element on the carrier; and the cam follower passes below the cam while the carrier is moved by the actuator from the storage position to the activated position, allowing the spring member to bias the scraper onto the sensor as the sensor moves with the carrier to the activated position, thereby providing a uni-directional scraping for the sensor.
  • 5. A waste ink removal system according to claim 4, wherein the cam further comprises:a first cam surface which initially lifts the scraper arm through contact with the cam follower while the carrier is moved from the activated position to the storage position; a second cam surface which receives the cam follower from the first cam surface as the carrier continues to move from the activated position to the storage position; and wherein the cam follower passes below the second cam surface when the carrier returns from the storage position to the activated position and subsequently passes over the first cam surface just before reaching the activated position.
  • 6. A waste ink removal system according to claim 5 wherein the frame further comprises a guide arm or a plurality of guide arms which slideably support the carrier.
  • 7. A waste ink removal system according to claim 6 wherein the carrier further comprises a printed circuit board with electronics to interface with the sensor.
  • 8. A printing mechanism comprising:a printhead which selectively ejects ink; an ink drop sensor which receives ink from the printhead and accumulates an ink residue thereon; and a waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from the sensor, the waste ink removal system comprising: a frame slideably supporting a carrier; the carrier supporting the sensor; an actuator which moves the carrier between an activated position and a storage position; an absorber pivotally supported by the frame, to selectively contact the sensor and remove ink residue therefrom when the sensor is in the storage position; and a scrape pivotally supported by the frame to scrape ink residue from the sensor as the carrier moves from the storage position to the activated position.
  • 9. A printing mechanism according to claim 8 wherein the actuator comprises an inkjet printhead servicing member which moves between a first position and a second position.
  • 10. A printing mechanism according to claim 9 further comprising:a scraper arm pivotally supported by the frame, which supports the scraper and the absorber; and a spring member, connected between the frame and the scraper arm to bias the scraper arm in a direction to allow scraper and the absorber to interfere with the carrier.
  • 11. A printing mechanism according to claim 10 wherein:the scraper arm further comprises a cam follower, the carrier further comprises a cam which lifts the scraper arm through contact between the cam follower and the cam while the carrier moves from the storage position to the activated position; the cam follower clears the cam as the carrier reaches the storage position, while the spring member pivots the absorber into contact with the sensing element on the carrier; and the cam follower passes below the cam while the carrier is moved by the actuator from the storage position to the activated position, allowing the spring member to bias the scraper onto the sensor as the sensor moves with the carrier to the activated position, thereby providing a uni-directional scraper for the sensor.
  • 12. A printing mechanism according to claim 11, wherein the cam further comprises:a first cam surface which initially lifts the scraper arm through contact with the cam follower while the carrier is moved from the activated position to the storage position; a second cam surface which receives the cam follower from the first cam surface as the carrier continues to move from the activated position to the storage position; and wherein the cam follower passes below the second cam surface when the carrier returns from the storage position to the activated position and subsequently passes over the first cam surface just before reaching the activated position.
  • 13. A printing mechanism according to claim 12 where the frame further comprises a guide arm or a plurality of guide arms which slideably support the carrier.
  • 14. A printing mechanism according to claim 13 wherein the carrier further comprises a printed circuit board with electronics to interface with the sensor.
  • 15. A method of cleaning ink residue from an ink drop detection sensor in a printing mechanism, comprising:transitioning the sensor from a storage position and an activated position; thereafter, scraping the sensor while depositing ink on the sensor and accumulating ink residue thereon; thereafter, retracting the sensor to the storage position; thereafter, absorbing the ink residue from the sensor; and thereafter, returning the sensor from the storage position to the activated position.
  • 16. A method according to claim 15 for removing ink residue, further comprising:while returning the sensor from the storage position to the activated position, scraping ink residue from the sensor.
  • 17. A method according to claim 16 for removing ink residue, further comprising scraping ink residue from the sensor before reaching the activated position.
  • 18. A method according to claim 17 for removing ink residue, further comprising lifting the scraper while retracting the sensor to the storage position.
  • 19. A method according to claim 18 for removing ink residue, wherein lifting the scraper while retracting the sensor to the storage position comprises lifting by pivoting the scraper.
US Referenced Citations (11)
Number Name Date Kind
4074217 Yanagawa Feb 1978 A
4310846 Horike Jan 1982 A
4323905 Reitberger et al. Apr 1982 A
4333083 Aldridge Jun 1982 A
5036340 Osborne Jul 1991 A
5109239 Cobbs et al. Apr 1992 A
5255009 Bauer et al. Oct 1993 A
5949448 Man et al. Sep 1999 A
6086190 Schantz et al. Jul 2000 A
6094981 Hochstein Aug 2000 A
6155667 Eckard et al. Dec 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
06-238906 Aug 1994 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Hewlett-Packard Company, U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/560,430, filed Apr. 28, 2000, entitled “Electrical Interconnect Cleaning System for Inkjet Cartridges”.