A datacenter or set of datacenters may include both host computers that host virtual machines (VMs) as well as physical “bare metal” servers. The bare metal servers are provisioned using different files (e.g., an optical disc (ISO) image, a dd image, or a similar format) than the VMs, which use VM-specific format (e.g., virtual machine disk image (VMDK)). As such, two separate disk image files in two different formats are required to deploy the same image on two different computers. Similarly, the interface (e.g., the APIs) used by a compute manager (e.g., VMware's vCenter) to communicate with VMs are not applicable to bare metal computers. As such, techniques that unify the management of the devices within a datacenter or set of datacenters would be useful.
Some embodiments provide methods for using a smart network interface controller (NIC) to manage a bare metal computer in a physical network (e.g., a datacenter or set of datacenters) in a manner similar to the management of virtual machines (VMs) in the same network. Specifically, some embodiments use the smart NIC (i) to enable the bare metal computer to access a VM image and execute the operating system and applications defined by the VM image and/or (ii) to enable a compute manager for the network to communicate with the bare metal computer using the same application programming interfaces (APIs) as for communication with VMs on host computers in the network.
The smart NIC, in some embodiments, is a NIC that includes (i) an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), (ii) a general-purpose central processing unit (CPU), and (iii) memory. The ASIC, in some embodiments, is an I/O ASIC that handles the processing of packets forwarded to and from the computer, and is at least partly controlled by the CPU. The CPU executes a NIC operating system in some embodiments that controls the ASIC and can run other programs, such as API translation logic to enable the compute manager to communicate with the bare metal computer and to enable the bare metal computer to access the VM image. The smart NIC also includes a configurable peripheral control interface express (PCIe) interface in order to connect to the other physical components of the bare metal computer system (e.g., the x86 CPU, memory, etc.). Via this configurable PCIe interface, the smart NIC can present itself to the bare metal computer system as a multitude of devices, including a packet processing NIC, a hard disk (using non-volatile memory express (NVMe) over PCIe), or other devices.
Although not necessary for managing a bare metal computer, the NIC operating system of some embodiments is capable of executing a virtualization program (similar to a hypervisor) that enables sharing resources (e.g., memory, CPU resources) of the smart NIC among multiple machines (e.g., VMs) if those VMs execute on the computer. The virtualization program can provide compute virtualization services and/or network virtualization services similar to a managed hypervisor. These network virtualization services, in some embodiments, include segregating data messages into different private (e.g., overlay) networks that are defined over the physical network (shared between the private networks), forwarding the data messages for these private networks (e.g., performing switching and/or routing operations), and/or performing middlebox services for the private networks.
The smart NIC of some embodiments, as mentioned, enables the bare metal computer system to use a virtual machine image rather than an internal hard disk (or similar local non-volatile memory). The smart NIC connects (via the PCIe bus) to the other components of the bare metal computer system (e.g., the x86 processor(s), the memory) and appears to these components as a local NVMe disk. As such, the bare metal computer sends read/write instructions to the smart NIC (to boot the system, run applications, read and write files, etc.), and the smart NIC streams the required data to and from the VM image at the external storage using NVMe over Fabric (NVMeOF) or a remote distributed storage area network (DSAN) cluster protocol. So long as the external storage is NVMeOF-capable, this external storage may be any type of network-accessible storage (e.g., a distributed storage such as virtual storage area network (VSAN), a storage array, a storage associated with a compute manager, etc.). The read/write commands, in some embodiments, are disk read/write instructions from the CPU, which the smart NIC translates into file read/write commands and sends over NVMeOF.
The VM disk image, in some embodiments, is stored in a proprietary VM-specific format, such as VM disk image (VMDK). The use of such a VM image enables a network administrator to save an image of a configured VM and then use that image to instantiate numerous VMs and/or physical servers. That is, the same VM image that is used to instantiate VMs in the network may also be used for the configuration (e.g., operating system, applications, etc.) of a bare metal physical computer. Thus, the same configuration can be applied by a user of the network to both types of machines (virtual and physical machines).
The smart NIC also enables unified management of the VMs and bare metal computers in the network by enabling a compute manager that manages the machines in the network to use a same set of APIs for configuration and control of the VMs and bare metal computers. Typically, different APIs are used to communicate with VMs than are used to communicate with the bare metal hardware for operations such as powering on/off and configuring the machines and for providing remote console input (e.g., keyboard/mouse/touch input).
The use of a smart NIC, at least at the bare metal computers, allows for the compute manager to use a uniform set of APIs, with the smart NIC translating API requests in a first format from the compute manager into API requests in a second format native to the bare metal computer. For instance, physical computers typically use intelligent platform management interface (IPMI) or Redfish for remote configuration, retrieval of physical resource statistics, etc., whereas for VMs other protocols are used (e.g., platform-specific protocols). The smart NIC operating system of some embodiments includes translation logic that translates the API calls and responses between a unified format used by the compute manager and the native format of the bare metal computer system. In some embodiments, either a hypervisor executing on a host computer or a smart NIC of the host computer also translates API calls and responses between the unified format used by the compute manager and the format used by the VMs.
Through these techniques enabled by the smart NIC of some embodiments, the compute manager of some embodiments (e.g., VMware's vCenter) can manage a network with both hosted VMs and bare metal physical computers while treating each of these types of machines in the same manner. That is, the UI tools, management stacks, etc. for managing VMs can be applied equally to both VMs and bare metal physical computers. These tools include tools for managing and deploying VM images that can now be applied to deploying these images on bare metal physical computers, as well as tools for configuring, viewing, and accessing machines in the network.
The preceding Summary is intended to serve as a brief introduction to some embodiments of the invention. It is not meant to be an introduction or overview of all inventive subject matter disclosed in this document. The Detailed Description that follows and the Drawings that are referred to in the Detailed Description will further describe the embodiments described in the Summary as well as other embodiments. Accordingly, to understand all the embodiments described by this document, a full review of the Summary, Detailed Description and the Drawings is needed. Moreover, the claimed subject matters are not to be limited by the illustrative details in the Summary, Detailed Description and the Drawing, but rather are to be defined by the appended claims, because the claimed subject matters can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the subject matters.
The novel features of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, for purpose of explanation, several embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following figures.
In the following detailed description of the invention, numerous details, examples, and embodiments of the invention are set forth and described. However, it will be clear and apparent to one skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the embodiments set forth and that the invention may be practiced without some of the specific details and examples discussed.
Some embodiments provide methods for using a smart network interface controller (NIC) to manage a bare metal computer in a physical network (e.g., a datacenter or set of datacenters) in a manner similar to the management of virtual machines (VMs) in the same network. Specifically, some embodiments use the smart NIC (i) to enable the bare metal computer to access a VM image and execute the operating system and applications defined by the VM image and/or (ii) to enable a compute manager for the network to communicate with the bare metal computer using the same application programming interfaces (APIs) as for communication with VMs on host computers in the network.
In addition, while both the CPU 115 and the memory 120 are shown as directly connected to the PCIe bus 125, it should be understood that many different physical configurations are possible for this hardware, and not all (or necessarily any) of the CPU cores and/or memory will necessarily be directly connected to the PCIe bus 125. Rather, the smart NIC 105 connects to the PCIe bus 125 through a physical PCIe interface and can communicate with the CPU 115 via the PCIe bus 125, even if this communication uses other buses. Similarly, the memory 120 could be connected directly to the CPU cores in some embodiments. It should also be noted that the bare metal computer system 100 will typically include many other hardware elements not shown in this figure, such as one or more GPUs, non-volatile storage (which might not be used to store the operating system and application software, in some embodiments).
The smart NIC 105 connects the bare metal computer 100 to the physical network 110. Though not shown, many other bare metal computers and/or host computers (on which data compute nodes (DCNs), such as VMs, containers, etc. are hosted) may also be connected to the network. In addition, an external storage 130 is accessible to the smart NIC 105 (and thus the bare metal computer 100) via the network 110. This external storage 130 represents any of a number of different types of storages, such as a hyperconverged infrastructure storage (e.g., a virtual storage area network (VSAN)), a logical storage volume (e.g., a virtualized storage area network or network attached storage array), a storage associated with a compute manager, or any other network-accessible storage.
Distributed storage (e.g., VSAN) is a storage virtualization software that uses a software-defined approach to create shared storage for VMs or, using smart NICs, bare metal computers. This distributed storage technology of some embodiments virtualizes physical storage resources (e.g., of host computers) and turns these storage resources into pools (clusters) of storage that can be divided and assigned to VMs, bare metal computing devices, and applications according to their respective requirements. In some embodiments, the distributed storage manages data in the form of flexible data containers (objects), which are logical volumes that have data and metadata distributed across a cluster. Thus, a virtual machine disk image file would be an object in such a storage architecture. The features of such a distributed storage service in some embodiments include (1) data efficiency processes, such as deduplication operations, compression operations, and thin provisioning, (2) security processes, such as end-to-end encryption, and access control operations, (3) data and life cycle management, such as storage vMotion, snapshot operations, snapshot schedules, cloning, disaster recovery, backup, long term storage, (4) performance optimizing operations, such as QoS policies (e.g., max and/or min I/O regulating policies), and (5) analytic operations, such as collecting performance metrics and usage data for virtual disk (IO, latency, etc.). Such hyperconverged infrastructure storage is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 9,666,523, while logical storage volumes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,775,773. Both of these U.S. Patents are incorporated herein by reference.
The CPU 205 executes a NIC operating system (OS) in some embodiments that controls the ASIC and can perform other operations, such as translation logic to enable the compute manager to communicate with the bare metal computer and to enable the bare metal computer to access a VM image (e.g., stored in external storage).
The PCIe driver 310 includes multiple physical functions 325, each of which is capable of instantiating multiple virtual functions 330. These different physical functions 325 enable the smart NIC to present as multiple different types of devices to the bare metal computer system via its PCIe bus. For instance, the smart NIC can present itself as a network adapter (for processing data messages to and from the computer system) as well as a non-volatile memory express (NVMe) disk. By presenting itself as an NVMe disk, the smart NIC 305 enables the bare metal computer system to use a VM image rather than an internal hard disk (or similar local non-volatile memory) to boot from and as its primary disk.
The NIC OS 300 of some embodiments is capable of executing a virtualization program (similar to a hypervisor) that enables sharing resources (e.g., memory, CPU resources) of the smart NIC among multiple machines (e.g., VMs) if those VMs execute on the computer. The virtualization program can provide compute virtualization services and/or network virtualization services similar to a managed hypervisor, although the compute virtualization is not strictly necessary for a bare metal computer. These network virtualization services, in some embodiments, include segregating data messages into different private (e.g., overlay) networks that are defined over the physical network (shared between the private networks), forwarding the data messages for these private networks (e.g., performing switching and/or routing operations), and/or performing middlebox services for the private networks.
To implement these network virtualization services, the NIC OS 300 of some embodiments executes the virtual switch 320. The virtual switch 320 enables the smart NIC to perform software-defined networking, and provide the I/O ASIC 335 of the smart NIC 305 with a set of flow entries so that the I/O ASIC 335 can perform flow processing offload (FPO) for the computer system. This FPO is described in more detail in U.S. provisional patent application 63/084,436, filed Sep. 28, 2020, which is incorporated herein by reference. The I/O ASIC 335, in some embodiments, receives data messages from the network and transmits data messages to the network via a physical network port 340.
In addition to acting as a NIC for processing data traffic, the smart NIC presents itself as an NVMe device to the bare metal computer system, as indicated. As such, the bare metal computer (e.g., the CPU of the bare metal computer) sends read/write instructions to the smart NIC (to boot the system, run applications, read and write files, etc.). The smart NIC OS 300 includes a virtual disk emulator 312 in some embodiments that handles these requests from the bare metal computer system and translates them for communication with the external storage. The virtual disk emulator 312 in some embodiments interprets NVMe requests received via the PCIe interface. In some embodiments, the NIC OS 300 includes additional layers depending on the type of storage used for the virtual disk (e.g., whether the storage is a distributed storage area network (DSAN) such as VSAN, a logical storage volume such as vVOL, the compute manager storage, etc.). In some embodiments, the NIC OS 300 streams the required data to and from the external storage (i.e., to and from a VM image at the external storage) using NVMe over Fabric (NVMeOF), so long as the external storage is NVMeOF-capable.
The smart NIC 305 also includes API translation logic 315 in some embodiments. In some embodiments, the smart NIC 305 enables a compute manager to use a uniform set of APIs to communicate with both VMs and the bare metal computer in the network. The compute manager, in some embodiments, is a system responsible for managing the DCNs (e.g., VMs, containers, bare metal servers, etc.) attached to the network. The compute manager manages the life cycle of these DCNs, enables users to control the DCNs, etc. The API translation logic 315 translates API requests in a first format from the compute manager into API requests in a second format native to the bare metal computer. For instance, physical computers typically use intelligent platform management interface (IPMI) or Redfish for remote configuration, retrieval of physical resource statistics, etc., whereas for VMs other protocols are used (e.g., platform-specific protocols). The translation logic 315 translates the API calls and responses between a unified format used by the compute manager and the native format of the bare metal computer system. In some embodiments, either hypervisors executing on host computers or smart NICs of those host computer also translates API calls and responses between the unified format used by the compute manager and the format used by the VMs.
By presenting itself as an attached non-volatile storage device (e.g., an NVMe device), the smart NIC of some embodiments enables the bare metal computer system to use a virtual machine disk image rather than an internal hard disk (or similar local non-volatile memory) as its primary disk (i.e., the disk from which the computer system boots its own OS, and which is the primary file storage for the computer system). As described, the smart NIC connects (via the PCIe bus) to the other components of the bare metal computer system (e.g., the x86 processor(s), the memory) and appears to these components as a local NVMe disk. As such, the bare metal computer sends read/write instructions to the smart NIC (to boot the system, run applications, read and write files, etc.), and the smart NIC of some embodiments streams the required data to and from the VM image at the external storage using NVMeOF. The read/write commands, in some embodiments, are disk read/write instructions from the CPU, which the smart NIC translates into file read/write commands and sends over NVMeOF. Specifically, in some embodiments, the smart NIC receives read/write instructions in the NVMe format, and translates these into NVMeOF using an NVMeOF driver or into a remote DSAN format using a remote DSAN driver.
As shown, the process 400 begins by presenting (at 405) the smart NIC to the bare metal computer system as a disk from which to boot. In some embodiments, the smart NIC appears as a local NVMe disk when the computer system is powered on and the PCIe bus is initialized by the computer system firmware, and the firmware (e.g., BIOS) of the computer system is configured to use this (apparent) NVMe disk to boot from (i.e., rather than a local hard disk or other local non-volatile storage).
The process 400 then receives (at 410) instructions from the bare metal computer to read boot data. In some embodiments, this initial instruction comes from the BIOS and is for reading a boot loader into memory. In other embodiments, the boot loader is stored in non-volatile memory of the bare metal computer system, and the first instruction received by the smart NIC is from the boot loader, in order to start booting the operating system for the bare metal computer system.
The process 400 translates (at 415) the boot read command into a read command for a VM image file. In some embodiments, the VM image file is stored in a network-accessible storage (e.g., a distributed storage, a storage of the compute manager, etc.) in a proprietary VM-specific format, such as VM disk image (VMDK). The use of such a VM image enables a network administrator to save an image of a configured VM and then use that image to instantiate numerous VMs and/or physical servers. That is, the same VM image that is used to instantiate VMs in the network may also be used for the configuration (e.g., operating system, applications, etc.) of a bare metal physical computer. Thus, the same configuration can be applied by a user of the network to both types of machines (virtual and physical machines). The translation is performed by the virtual disk emulation layer of the smart NIC OS in some embodiments. In some embodiments, this VM image file is stored in a proprietary.
The process 400 then sends (at 420) the read command to the network-accessible storage that stores the VM image file. As described above, the network-accessible storage can be the compute manager storage (i.e., a set of files, including one or more VM images, stored by the compute manager), a distributed storage such as VSAN, etc. Some embodiments require that the network-accessible storage be NVMeOF compatible, so that the smart NIC can use the NVMeOF protocol to read data from and write data to the stored VM image. If VSAN or a similar distributed storage is used, in some embodiments a software layer for coordinating with such a distributed storage is part of the logic used by the smart NIC to translate the boot read commands. This software layer for connecting with a distributed storage such as VSAN may be part of the NIC OS kernel or a user space program, in different embodiments.
It should be noted that, in some embodiments, rather than the smart NIC translating the boot read command into a file read command for the VM image file, the network-accessible storage that stores the VM image file performs this translation. That is, in such embodiments, the smart NIC sends the boot read command to the network-accessible storage, which translates this into a file read command and sends the boot data to the smart NIC.
Next, the process receives (at 425) the boot data from the VM image file via the network. As indicated, this data is received via NVMeOF in some embodiments, and may be the boot loader (if the boot loader is not stored locally) or the initial OS boot data. In some embodiments, the operating system data is streamed from the network-accessible storage so that the data can be loaded into memory of the bare metal computer system.
The process translates (at 430) the received data for the bare metal computer system. This translation is performed by the same layer(s) as operation 415; if there are multiple software layers involved, then these layers perform their operations in the opposite order this time. The translation operations enable the data to appear as though it is being received by the computer system hardware from a local disk read operation.
Finally, the process 400 provides (at 435) the boot data to the bare metal computer system hardware. In some embodiments, the data is provided via the PCIe bus of the computer system, using NVMe over PCIe. The process 400 then ends. It should be understood, as mentioned, that this process may be ongoing as the operating system and any other required boot data is streamed from the externally-stored VM image to the computer system to be loaded into memory in some embodiments.
As shown, the process 500 begins by receiving (at 505) instructions from the bare metal computer to read data. In some embodiments, this instruction comes from the CPU as a disk read instruction for a particular disk address. The disk read instruction is received via the PCIe bus as an NVMe over PCIe read instruction in some embodiments.
The process 500 translates (at 510) the disk read command into a file read command for the VM image file. As described, in some embodiments the VM image file is stored in a network-accessible storage (e.g., a distributed storage, a storage of the compute manager, etc.) in a proprietary VM-specific format, such as VMDK. Because the VM image file is a virtual disk rather than a physical disk, the translation operation translates the read location into specified data from the VM image file in some embodiments. The translation operation is performed by the virtual disk emulation layer of the smart NIC OS in some embodiments.
The process 500 then sends (at 515) the read command to the network-accessible storage that stores the VM image file. As described above, the network-accessible storage can be the compute manager storage (i.e., a set of files, including one or more VM images, stored by the compute manager), a distributed storage such as VSAN, etc. Some embodiments require that the network-accessible storage be NVMeOF compatible, so that the smart NIC can use the NVMeOF protocol to read data from the stored VM image. If VSAN or a similar distributed storage is used, in some embodiments a software layer for coordinating with such a distributed storage is part of the logic used by the smart NIC to translate the disk read commands.
It should be noted that, in some embodiments, rather than the smart NIC translating the disk read command into a file read command for the VM image file, the network-accessible storage that stores the VM image file performs this translation. That is, in such embodiments, the smart NIC sends the disk read command to the network-accessible storage, which translates this into a file read command and sends the requested data to the smart NIC.
Next, the process 500 receives (at 520) the requested data from the VM image file via the network. As indicated, this data is received via NVMeOF in some embodiments. In some embodiments, depending on the size of the requested data, the data is streamed from the network-accessible storage so that the data can be loaded into memory of the bare metal computer system.
The process 500 translates (at 525) the received data for the bare metal computer system. This translation is performed by the same layer(s) as operation 510 in some embodiments; if there are multiple software layers involved, then these layers perform their operations in the opposite order this time. The translation operations enable the data to appear as though it is being received by the computer system hardware from a local disk read operation. Finally, the process 500 provides (at 530) the requested data to the bare metal computer system hardware. In some embodiments, the data is provided via the PCIe bus of the computer system, using NVMe over PCIe. The process 500 then ends.
As shown, the process 600 begins by receiving (at 605) instructions from the bare metal computer to write data. In some embodiments, this instruction comes from the CPU as a disk write instruction for a particular disk address. The disk write instruction is received via the PCIe bus as an NVMe over PCIe write instruction in some embodiments.
The process 600 translates (at 610) the disk write command into a file write command for the VM image file. As described, in some embodiments the VM image file is stored in a network-accessible storage (e.g., a distributed storage, a storage of the compute manager, etc.) in a proprietary VM-specific format, such as VMDK. Because the VM image file is a virtual disk rather than a physical disk, the translation operation translates the write location into specified data for the VM image file in some embodiments. The translation operation is performed by the virtual disk emulation layer of the smart NIC OS in some embodiments.
The process 600 then sends (at 615) the write command to the network-accessible storage that stores the VM image file. As described above, the network-accessible storage can be the compute manager storage (i.e., a set of files, including one or more VM images, stored by the compute manager), a distributed storage such as VSAN, etc. Some embodiments require that the network-accessible storage be NVMeOF compatible, so that the smart NIC can use the NVMeOF protocol to write data to the stored VM image. If VSAN or a similar distributed storage is used, in some embodiments a software layer for coordinating with such a distributed storage is part of the logic used by the smart NIC to translate the disk write commands. The process 600 then ends, although in some embodiments an acknowledgment message is received from the external storage to indicate that the data has been written to the VM image file.
It should be noted that, in some embodiments, rather than the smart NIC translating the disk write command into a file write command for the VM image file, the network-accessible storage that stores the VM image file performs this translation. That is, in such embodiments, the smart NIC sends the disk write command to the network-accessible storage, which translates this into a file write command and writes the data to the VM image file.
As indicated by the encircled 1, the computer system 710 issues a disk read or write operation (e.g., an NVMe over PCIe operation) to a physical function of the smart NIC that connects to the PCIe bus to emulate an NVMe device. The virtual disk emulator 705 (possibly combined with other software layers executed by the NIC OS) translates this into a file read or write operation and sends this operation (e.g., via NVMeOF) to the external storage 730 that stores the VM image 735 used to boot the bare metal computer system 710 (i.e., that stores the operating system running on the bare metal computer system 710), as shown by the encircled 2.
This external storage 730, which may represent a distributed storage, a storage array, the storage associated with a compute manager, etc.) provides the requested data (for a read operation), as shown by the encircled 3, or stores the requested data (for a write operation), again via NVMeOF. For read operations, the virtual disk emulator 705 (and any other necessary software layers, depending on the nature of the external storage 730) translates the data into a response to the disk read operation. This response with the requested data is provided to the bare metal computer system 710 (e.g., to the CPU 715) via the PCIe bus 725.
Because the smart NIC enables a bare metal computer system to use an externally-stored virtual disk as though it is a locally-attached disk and to boot from this virtual disk, in some embodiments a datacenter user (e.g., a network admin, app developer, etc.) can configure a VM, save the VM configuration, and then deploy this configuration on a bare metal computer (or multiple bare metal computers) in addition to deploying the configuration on additional VMs.
The second stage 810 illustrates that a VM image 850 is stored in the compute manager storage 825, after the compute manager commands the host 830 (e.g., the hypervisor 840) to save an image of the VM 835. This VM image is a VMDK file in some embodiments, that stores the operating system, applications, and configuration for the VM 835, and which can be used to deploy additional VMs in the network. It should be noted that while this example shows the VM 835 as a VM in the network that is managed by the compute manager, and thus saved via the compute manager 800, in other embodiments the admin or other user could configure a VM and save a VM image offline or by directly logging into the VM 835 on the host 830.
The third stage 815 illustrates that the user (via the user terminal 845 commands the compute manager 800 to deploy the VM image to a physical server in the network. As shown at this stage, the compute manager 800 manages at least one physical (bare metal) server 855 with a smart NIC 860, in addition to the host computers in the network. Based on this command, the compute manager issues commands to the server 855 (via the smart NIC) to (i) use the stored VM image 850 as its boot disk (and primary disk for running applications, saving files, etc.). As described below, in some embodiments the compute manager uses a first set of APIs to communicate with the hardware of the server 855 (e.g., the same APIs used to communicate with VMs in the network), and the smart NIC translates these APIs into the native hardware APIs required by the physical server hardware. The fourth stage 820 illustrates that the server 855 is now up and running with the operating system and configuration 865 specified by the VM image 850, the VM configuration having been seamlessly deployed to a physical server.
As mentioned, the smart NIC also enables unified management of the VMs and bare metal computers in the network by enabling a compute manager that manages the machines in the network to use the same set of APIs for configuration and control of the VMs and bare metal computers. Typically, different APIs are used to communicate with VMs than are used to communicate with the bare metal hardware for operations such as powering on/off and configuring the machines and for providing remote console input (e.g., keyboard/mouse/touch input). The use of a smart NIC, at least at the bare metal computers, allows for the compute manager to use a uniform set of APIs, with the smart NIC translating API requests in a first format from the compute manager into API requests in a second format native to the bare metal computer.
As an example, the compute manager 900 might use virtualized infrastructure manager (VIM) to communicate with hypervisors in a typical virtualized infrastructure. The translation logic 930 executing in the smart NIC 920 translates VIM API requests from the compute manager into the physical hardware APIs used by the bare metal computer. For instance, physical computers typically use intelligent platform management interface (IPMI) or Redfish for remote configuration, retrieval of physical resource statistics, etc., and the translation logical 930 of some embodiments translates VIM requests from VIM into IPMI or Redfish requests. Upon receiving a response, the translation logic 930 also translates the IPMI/Redfish responses into VIM responses. At the host computer 910, the hypervisor 925 also translates the VIM requests into a VM-specific API such as virtual machine communication interface (VMCI), enabling configuration, powering on and off of the VM, etc.
Similarly, the compute manager 900 might enable remote console sessions with the bare metal computer system, similar to a virtual machine. Here, an admin or other user can access and provide input to either the bare metal computer 915 or the VM 905 through the compute manager 900. The compute manager 900 uses the same set of remote console APIs, such as WebMKS, to communicate with the bare metal computer 915 and the VM 905. At the smart NIC 920, API translation logic 930 translates these uniform remote console APIs (e.g., WebMKS commands) into physical hardware APIs (e.g., virtual network computing (VNC)). This allows the remote user to provide input to the bare metal computer system 915 via the compute manager 900. Similarly, the hypervisor 925 at the host computer 910 translates commands in the uniform API into platform-specific commands for the VM, such as virtual KVM commands.
Through these techniques enabled by the smart NIC of some embodiments, the compute manager of some embodiments (e.g., VMware's vCenter) can manage a network with both hosted VMs and bare metal physical computers while treating each of these types of machines in the same manner. That is, the UI tools, management stacks, etc. for managing VMs can be applied equally to both VMs and bare metal physical computers. These tools include tools for managing and deploying VM images that can now be applied to deploying these images on bare metal physical computers, as well as tools for configuring, viewing, and accessing machines in the network.
The first VM disk image listed (VM1.vmdk) is an image of a Linux VM with a size of 1.2 TB, while the second VM disk image listed (VM2.vmdk) is an image of a Windows VM with a size of 1.5 TB. In this figure, the compute manager user has selected the second VM disk image in order to bring up a list of selectable options 1015 relating to the selected VM disk image. Specifically, in addition to the option to view statistics about the selected VM disk image, the user can opt to deploy the VM disk image either as a VM (as is common) or as a physical (bare metal) server, enabled by the smart NICs in the physical servers managed by the compute manager. In addition, some embodiments allow the user to select a VM disk image and deploy the image as numerous physical servers and/or numerous VMs at once (e.g., with each deployed VM or server using a different copy of the VM disk image).
In the manner described above, the bare metal computer system 1120 accesses the second copy of the VM image 1110 in external storage, via the smart NIC 1130. The bare metal computer 1120 boots from this VM image file 1110 in addition to using the image file as its primary disk, with the smart NIC 1130 emulating a locally-attached disk and streaming data to and from the VM image file 1110. Similarly, the VM 1115 also boots from the VM image file 1105 in addition to using the image file as its primary disk, with the hypervisor 1135 emulating a locally-attached disk and streaming data to and from the VM image file 1105.
It should be noted that the above discussion relates to the case in which the physical infrastructure (i.e., the hardware) and the operating systems of the bare metal computers are managed by the same entity. In some embodiments, different entities manage the smart NIC and the operating system (e.g., a cloud provider manages the smart NIC hardware while a cloud customer is granted access over the x86 operating system, or the enterprise IT team manages the hardware while a particular application group or business line within the enterprise manages the x86 operating system). In these cases (or, for that matter, when the hardware and operating system are both managed by the same entity), the smart NIC can make a virtual disk (not necessarily a VM image file, but any virtual disk for storage) available as an NVMe device over the PCIe bus of the bare metal computer, while also acting as a network gatekeeper.
To enable this, in some embodiments, the smart NIC OS is instructed via an API call to make a particular (e.g., already existing) virtual disk visible to the x86 operating system (which boots from the local non-volatile storage, rather than a remote virtual machine image in this case). The smart NIC OS then mounts the virtual disk (e.g., using a remote VSAN client, network file system (NFS), or another protocol), and exposes this mounted virtual disk as an NVMe disk on the PCIe bus, thereby allowing the operating system operating on the x86 host to use the virtual disk as though it was a local non-volatile storage.
The bus 1205 collectively represents all system, peripheral, and chipset buses that communicatively connect the numerous internal devices of the electronic system 1200. For instance, the bus 1205 communicatively connects the processing unit(s) 1210 with the read-only memory 1230, the system memory 1225, and the permanent storage device 1235.
From these various memory units, the processing unit(s) 1210 retrieve instructions to execute and data to process in order to execute the processes of the invention. The processing unit(s) may be a single processor or a multi-core processor in different embodiments.
The read-only-memory (ROM) 1230 stores static data and instructions that are needed by the processing unit(s) 1210 and other modules of the electronic system. The permanent storage device 1235, on the other hand, is a read-and-write memory device. This device is a non-volatile memory unit that stores instructions and data even when the electronic system 1200 is off. Some embodiments of the invention use a mass-storage device (such as a magnetic or optical disk and its corresponding disk drive) as the permanent storage device 1235.
Other embodiments use a removable storage device (such as a floppy disk, flash drive, etc.) as the permanent storage device. Like the permanent storage device 1235, the system memory 1225 is a read-and-write memory device. However, unlike storage device 1235, the system memory is a volatile read-and-write memory, such a random-access memory. The system memory stores some of the instructions and data that the processor needs at runtime. In some embodiments, the invention's processes are stored in the system memory 1225, the permanent storage device 1235, and/or the read-only memory 1230. From these various memory units, the processing unit(s) 1210 retrieve instructions to execute and data to process in order to execute the processes of some embodiments.
The bus 1205 also connects to the input and output devices 1240 and 1245. The input devices enable the user to communicate information and select commands to the electronic system. The input devices 1240 include alphanumeric keyboards and pointing devices (also called “cursor control devices”). The output devices 1245 display images generated by the electronic system. The output devices include printers and display devices, such as cathode ray tubes (CRT) or liquid crystal displays (LCD). Some embodiments include devices such as a touchscreen that function as both input and output devices.
Finally, as shown in
Some embodiments include electronic components, such as microprocessors, storage and memory that store computer program instructions in a machine-readable or computer-readable medium (alternatively referred to as computer-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or machine-readable storage media). Some examples of such computer-readable media include RAM, ROM, read-only compact discs (CD-ROM), recordable compact discs (CD-R), rewritable compact discs (CD-RW), read-only digital versatile discs (e.g., DVD-ROM, dual-layer DVD-ROM), a variety of recordable/rewritable DVDs (e.g., DVD-RAM, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, etc.), flash memory (e.g., SD cards, mini-SD cards, micro-SD cards, etc.), magnetic and/or solid state hard drives, read-only and recordable Blu-Ray® discs, ultra-density optical discs, any other optical or magnetic media, and floppy disks. The computer-readable media may store a computer program that is executable by at least one processing unit and includes sets of instructions for performing various operations. Examples of computer programs or computer code include machine code, such as is produced by a compiler, and files including higher-level code that are executed by a computer, an electronic component, or a microprocessor using an interpreter.
While the above discussion primarily refers to microprocessor or multi-core processors that execute software, some embodiments are performed by one or more integrated circuits, such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). In some embodiments, such integrated circuits execute instructions that are stored on the circuit itself.
As used in this specification, the terms “computer”, “server”, “processor”, and “memory” all refer to electronic or other technological devices. These terms exclude people or groups of people. For the purposes of the specification, the terms display or displaying means displaying on an electronic device. As used in this specification, the terms “computer readable medium,” “computer readable media,” and “machine readable medium” are entirely restricted to tangible, physical objects that store information in a form that is readable by a computer. These terms exclude any wireless signals, wired download signals, and any other ephemeral signals.
This specification refers throughout to computational and network environments that include virtual machines (VMs). However, virtual machines are merely one example of data compute nodes (DCNs) or data compute end nodes, also referred to as addressable nodes. DCNs may include non-virtualized physical hosts, virtual machines, containers that run on top of a host operating system without the need for a hypervisor or separate operating system, and hypervisor kernel network interface modules.
VMs, in some embodiments, operate with their own guest operating systems on a host using resources of the host virtualized by virtualization software (e.g., a hypervisor, virtual machine monitor, etc.). The tenant (i.e., the owner of the VM) can choose which applications to operate on top of the guest operating system. Some containers, on the other hand, are constructs that run on top of a host operating system without the need for a hypervisor or separate guest operating system. In some embodiments, the host operating system uses name spaces to isolate the containers from each other and therefore provides operating-system level segregation of the different groups of applications that operate within different containers. This segregation is akin to the VM segregation that is offered in hypervisor-virtualized environments that virtualize system hardware, and thus can be viewed as a form of virtualization that isolates different groups of applications that operate in different containers. Such containers are more lightweight than VMs.
Hypervisor kernel network interface modules, in some embodiments, is a non-VM DCN that includes a network stack with a hypervisor kernel network interface and receive/transmit threads. One example of a hypervisor kernel network interface module is the vmknic module that is part of the ESXi™ hypervisor of VMware, Inc.
It should be understood that while the specification refers to VMs, the examples given could be any type of DCNs, including physical hosts, VMs, non-VM containers, and hypervisor kernel network interface modules. In fact, the example networks could include combinations of different types of DCNs in some embodiments.
While the invention has been described with reference to numerous specific details, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the invention. In addition, a number of the figures (including
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5884313 | Talluri et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887134 | Ebrahim | Mar 1999 | A |
5974547 | Klimenko | Oct 1999 | A |
6141749 | Coss et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6219699 | McCloghrie et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6393483 | Latif et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6496935 | Fink et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6594704 | Birenback et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6738821 | Wilson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6856995 | Ibitayo et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6880089 | Bommareddy et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6963921 | Yang et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7055173 | Chaganty et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7079544 | Wakayama et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7136926 | Iyer et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7349382 | Marimuthu et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7424710 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7512071 | Goldschmidt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7606260 | Oguchi et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7760733 | Eiriksson et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7774502 | Murthy et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818452 | Matthews et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7849168 | Utsunomiya et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853998 | Blaisdell et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7913294 | Maufer et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7948986 | Ghosh et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8032933 | Turley et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8108550 | Lahoti et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8145768 | Hawthorne | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8190767 | Maufer et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8194674 | Pagel et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8365294 | Ross | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8442059 | Iglesia et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8615009 | Ramamoorthi et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8660129 | Brendel et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8825900 | Gross et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8856518 | Sridharan et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8930529 | Wang et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8931047 | Wanser et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9008082 | Dyke | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9008085 | Kamble et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015823 | Koponen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9047109 | Wang et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9116727 | Benny et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9135044 | Maharana | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9143582 | Banavalikar et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9148895 | PalChaudhuri et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9152593 | Galles | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9154327 | Marino et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9197551 | DeCusatis et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9231849 | Hyoudou et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9325739 | Roth et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9378161 | Dalal et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9380027 | Lian et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9419897 | Cherian et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9460031 | Dalal et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9621516 | Basak et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9634990 | Lee | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9692698 | Cherian et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9697019 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9729512 | Jain et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9755903 | Masurekar et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9806948 | Masurekar et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9825913 | Jain et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9952782 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10050884 | Dhanabalan et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10142127 | Cherian et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10162793 | BShara et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10193771 | Koponen et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10284478 | Yokota | May 2019 | B2 |
10341296 | Bhagwat et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10534629 | Pierre et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10567308 | Subbiah et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10873566 | Han | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10997106 | Bandaru et al. | May 2021 | B1 |
11005755 | Yu et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11019030 | Jain et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11038845 | Han | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11108593 | Cherian et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11221972 | Raman et al. | Jan 2022 | B1 |
11385981 | Silakov et al. | Jul 2022 | B1 |
11593278 | Kim et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11606310 | Ang et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11636053 | Kim et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11677719 | Han | Jun 2023 | B2 |
20020069245 | Kim | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030005144 | Engel et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030093481 | Mitchell et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097589 | Syvanne | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123452 | Cox et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130833 | Brownell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140124 | Burns | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145114 | Gertner | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030161272 | Teplitsky | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030200290 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212900 | Liu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217119 | Raman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040022259 | Tuchow | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049701 | Pennec et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050053079 | Havala | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050114337 | Lunteren | May 2005 | A1 |
20050198125 | Beck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229246 | Rajagopal et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238022 | Panigrahy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060002386 | Yik et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029056 | Perera et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041894 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060191003 | Bahk et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206603 | Rajan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206655 | Chappell et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060236054 | Kitamura | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070011734 | Balakrishnan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070056038 | Lok | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061492 | Riel | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070174850 | Zur | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080008202 | Terrell et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028097 | Makela | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080072305 | Casado et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080163207 | Reumann et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080267177 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289028 | Jansen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298274 | Takashige et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007251 | Abzarian et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090089537 | Vick et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119087 | Ang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129271 | Ramankutty et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129394 | Bar-Kovetz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150521 | Tripathi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161547 | Riddle et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161673 | Breslau et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090235325 | Dimitrakos et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249470 | Litvin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249472 | Litvin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090327781 | Tripathi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014526 | Chavan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100037311 | He et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070677 | Thakkar | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100616 | Bryson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115174 | Akyol et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115208 | Logan | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125667 | Soundararajan | May 2010 | A1 |
20100165874 | Brown et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100257580 | Zhao | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100275199 | Smith et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100287306 | Matsuda | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110016467 | Kane | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022695 | Dalal et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060859 | Shukla et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072486 | Hadar et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110103259 | Aybay et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113467 | Agarwal et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110134920 | Dyke | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110219170 | Frost et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225647 | Dilley et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246637 | Murakami | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120042138 | Eguchi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120072909 | Malik et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079478 | Galles et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120096459 | Miyazaki | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120163388 | Goel et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167082 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120207039 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207174 | Shieh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120240182 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259953 | Gertner | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278584 | Nagami et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290703 | Barabash et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120320918 | Fomin et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007740 | Kikuchi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033993 | Cardona et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044631 | Biswas et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058346 | Sridharan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130061047 | Sridharan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073702 | Umbehocker | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073743 | Ramasamy et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130125122 | Hansen | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125230 | Koponen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145106 | Kan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163594 | Sharma et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130227097 | Yasuda et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227550 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130265883 | Henry et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130311663 | Kamath et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318219 | Kancherla | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318268 | Dalal et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332983 | Koorevaar et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346583 | Low et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140003442 | Hernandez et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140056151 | Petrus et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067763 | Jorapurkar et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140068602 | Gember et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074799 | Karampuri et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098815 | Mishra et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115578 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140123211 | Wanser et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140164595 | Bray et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140195666 | Dumitriu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140208075 | McCormick, Jr. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215036 | Elzur | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140244983 | McDonald et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245296 | Sethuramalingam | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245423 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140269712 | Kidambi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269754 | Eguchi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281030 | Cui et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282855 | Clark et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140330977 | Bemmel | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140373148 | Nelms et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376367 | Jain et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150007317 | Jain | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150016300 | Devireddy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019748 | Gross, IV et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150020067 | Brant et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150033222 | Hussain et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150052280 | Lawson | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150082417 | Bhagwat et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150117445 | Koponen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150156250 | Varshney et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172183 | DeCusatis et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150200808 | Gourlay et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150212892 | Li et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215207 | Qin et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150222547 | Hayut et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150237013 | Bansal et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150242134 | Takada et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150261556 | Jain et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261720 | Kagan et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150281178 | Raman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281179 | Raman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150326532 | Grant et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150347231 | Gopal et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358288 | Jain et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358290 | Jain et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381494 | Cherian et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381495 | Cherian et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160006696 | Donley et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160092108 | Karaje et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160134702 | Gertner | May 2016 | A1 |
20160142320 | Gyllenhammer et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156591 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160162302 | Warszawski et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160162438 | Hussain et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160179579 | Amann et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182342 | Singaravelu et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160239330 | Bride et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160285913 | Itskin et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160294858 | Woolward et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306648 | Deguillard et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170005986 | Bansal et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170024334 | Bergsten et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170075845 | Kopparthi | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170093623 | Zheng | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099532 | Kakande | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170104790 | Meyers et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170118173 | Arramreddy et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170134433 | Hugenbruch et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170161090 | Kodama | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170161189 | Gertner | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170180273 | Daly et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170180414 | Andrews et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170180477 | Hashimoto | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170187679 | Basak et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170195454 | Shieh | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170208100 | Lian et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214549 | Yoshino et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170244671 | Kamalakantha et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244673 | Han | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244674 | Han | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170264622 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170295033 | Cherian et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180024775 | Miller | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180024964 | Mao et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180032249 | Makhervaks et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180088978 | Li et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180095872 | Dreier et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180097778 | Jain et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180109471 | Chang et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180152540 | Niell et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180203719 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180260125 | Botes et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180262599 | Firestone | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180278684 | Rashid et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180309641 | Wang et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180309718 | Zuo | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180329743 | Pope et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180331976 | Pope et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180336346 | Guenther | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180337991 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349037 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180359215 | Khare et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190026146 | Peffers et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190042506 | Devey et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190044809 | Willis et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190044866 | Chilikin et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190075063 | McDonnell et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190132296 | Jiang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190158396 | Yu et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190173689 | Cherian et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190200105 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190235909 | Jin et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190278675 | Bolkhovitin et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190280980 | Hyoudou | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190286373 | Karumbunathan et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190306083 | Shih et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200021532 | Borikar et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200028800 | Strathman et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200042234 | Krasner et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200042389 | Kulkarni et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200042412 | Kulkarni et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200133909 | Hefty et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200136996 | Li et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200213227 | Pianigiani | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200259731 | Sivaraman et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200278892 | Nainar et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200278893 | Niell et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200314011 | Deval et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200319812 | He et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328192 | Zaman et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200382329 | Yuan | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200401320 | Pyati et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200412659 | Ilitzky et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210019270 | Li et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210026670 | Krivenok et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210058342 | McBrearty | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210176212 | Han | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210226846 | Ballard et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210232528 | Kutch et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210266259 | Renner, III et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210273911 | Jain et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210314232 | Nainar et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210357242 | Ballard et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210359955 | Musleh et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210377166 | Brar et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210377188 | Ghag et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210392017 | Cherian et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210409317 | Seshan et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220027147 | Maddukuri et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220043572 | Said et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220100432 | Kim et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220100491 | Voltz et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220100542 | Voltz | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220100545 | Cherian et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220100546 | Cherian et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220103478 | Ang et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220103487 | Ang et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220103488 | Wang et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220103490 | Kim et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220103629 | Cherian et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220150055 | Cui et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220164451 | Bagwell | May 2022 | A1 |
20220197681 | Rajagopal | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220206908 | Brar et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220206962 | Kim et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220206964 | Kim et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220210229 | Maddukuri et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220231968 | Rajagopal | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220272039 | Cardona et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220335563 | Elzur | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230004508 | Liu et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230195488 | Ang et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230195675 | Ang et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230198833 | Ang et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2672100 | Jun 2008 | CA |
2918551 | Jul 2010 | CA |
101258725 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101540826 | Sep 2009 | CN |
102018004046 | Nov 2018 | DE |
1482711 | Dec 2004 | EP |
2748750 | Jul 2014 | EP |
3598291 | Jan 2020 | EP |
4127923 | Feb 2023 | EP |
4160424 | Apr 2023 | EP |
202107297 | Feb 2021 | TW |
2005099201 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2007036372 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008095010 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2010008984 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2013074828 | May 2013 | WO |
2015187201 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016003489 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2020027913 | Feb 2020 | WO |
2020211071 | Oct 2020 | WO |
2021030020 | Feb 2021 | WO |
2022066267 | Mar 2022 | WO |
2022066268 | Mar 2022 | WO |
2022066270 | Mar 2022 | WO |
2022066271 | Mar 2022 | WO |
2022066531 | Mar 2022 | WO |
2023121720 | Jun 2023 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Author Unknown, “An Introduction to SmartNICs” The Next Platform, Mar. 4, 2019, 4 pages, retrieved from https://www.nextplatform.com/2019/03/04/an-introduction-to-smartnics/. |
Author Unknown, “In-Hardware Storage Virtualization—NVMe SNAP™ Revolutionizes Data Center Storage: Composable Storage Made Simple,” Month Unknown 2019, 3 pages, Mellanox Technologies, Sunnyvale, CA, USA. |
Author Unknown, “Package Manager,” Wikipedia, Sep. 8, 2020, 10 pages. |
Author Unknown, “VMDK”, Wikipedia, May 17, 2020, 3 pages, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=VMDK&oldid=957225521. |
Author Unknown, “vSphere Managed Inventory Objects,” Aug. 3, 2020, 3 pages, retrieved from https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/6.7/com.vmware.vsphere.vcenterhost.doc/GUID-4D4B3DF2-D033-4782-A030-3C3600DE5A7F.html, VMware, Inc. |
Grant, Stewart, et al., “SmartNIC Performance Isolation with FairNIC: Programmable Networking for the Cloud,” SIGCOMM '20, Aug. 10-14, 2020, 13 pages, ACM, Virtual Event, USA. |
Liu, Ming, et al., “Offloading Distributed Applications onto SmartNICs using iPipe,” SIGCOMM '19, Aug. 19-23, 2019, 16 pages, ACM, Beijing, China. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of Commonly Owned International Patent Application PCT/US2021/042121, dated Oct. 27, 2021, 13 pages, International Searching Authority (EPO). |
Suarez, Julio, “Reduce TCO with Arm Based SmartNICs,” Nov. 14, 2019, 12 pages, retrieved from https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/reduce-tco-with-arm-based-smartnics. |
Author Unknown, “vSAN Planning and Deployment” Update 3, Aug. 20, 2019, 85 pages, VMware, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA. |
Author Unknown, “What is End-to-End Encryption and How does it Work?,” Mar. 7, 2018, 4 pages, Proton Technologies AG, Geneva, Switzerland. |
Harris, Jim, “Accelerating NVME-oF* for VMs with the Storage Performance Development Kit,” Flash Memory Summit, Aug. 2017, 18 pages, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA. |
Perlroth, Nicole, “What is End-to-End Encryption? Another Bull's-Eye on Big Tech,” The New York Times, Nov. 19, 2019, 4 pages, retrieved from https://nytimes.com/2019/11/19/technology/end-to-end-encryption.html. |
Anwer, Muhammad Bilal, et al., “Building a Fast, Virtualized Data Plane with Programmable Hardware,” Aug. 17, 2009, 8 pages, VISA'09, ACM, Barcelona, Spain. |
Author Unknown, “Network Functions Virtualisation; Infrastructure Architecture; Architecture of the Hypervisor Domain,” Draft ETSI GS NFV-INF 004 V0.3.1, May 28, 2014, 50 pages, France. |
Koponen, Teemu, et al., “Network Virtualization in Multi-tenant Datacenters,” Technical Report TR-2013-001E, Aug. 2013, 22 pages, VMware, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA. |
Le Vasseur, Joshua, et al., “Standardized but Flexible I/O for Self-Virtualizing Devices,” Month Unknown 2008, 7 pages. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/091,663, filed Nov. 6, 2020, 29 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned Related U.S. Appl. No. 17/107,568 with similar specification, filed Nov. 30, 2020, 39 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/114,975, filed Dec. 8, 2020, 52 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/114,994, filed Dec. 8, 2020, 51 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,318, filed Jan. 9, 2021, 70 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,319, filed Jan. 9, 2021, 70 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,320, filed Jan. 9, 2021, 70 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,321, filed Jan. 9, 2021, 49 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,322, filed Jan. 9, 2021, 49 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,329, filed Jan. 9, 2021, 50 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,334, filed Jan. 9, 2021, 49 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Peterson, Larry L., et al., “OS Support for General-Purpose Routers,” Month Unknown 1999, 6 pages, Department of Computer Science, Princeton University. |
Pettit, Justin, et al., “Virtual Switching in an Era of Advanced Edges,” In Proc. 2nd Workshop on Data Center-Converged and Virtual Ethernet Switching (DCCAVES), Sep. 2010, 7 pages, vol. 22. ITC. |
Spalink, Tammo, et al., “Building a Robust Software-Based Router Using Network Processors,” Month Unknown 2001, 14 pages, ACM, Banff, Canada. |
Turner, Jon, et al., “Supercharging PlanetLab—High Performance, Multi-Application Overlay Network Platform,” SIGCOMM-07, Aug. 27-31, 2007, 12 pages, ACM, Koyoto, Japan. |
Angeles, Sara, “Cloud vs. Data Center: What's the difference?” Nov. 23, 2018, 1 page, retrieved from https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/4982-cloud-vs-data-center.html. |
Author Unknown, “Middlebox,” Wikipedia, Nov. 19, 2019, 1 page, Wikipedia.com. |
Doyle, Lee, “An Introduction to smart NICs and their Benefits,” Jul. 2019, 2 pages, retrieved from https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/tip/An-introduction-to-smart-NICs-and-ther-benefits. |
Author Unknown, “8.6 Receive-Side Scaling (RSS),” Month Unknown 2020, 2 pages, Red Hat, Inc. |
Herbert, Tom, et al., “Scaling in the Linux Networking Stack,” Jun. 2, 2020, retrieved from https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/networking/scaling.html. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 16/890,890, filed Jun. 2, 2020, 39 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Stringer, Joe, et al., “OVS Hardware Offloads Discussion Panel,” Nov. 7, 2016, 37 pages, retrieved from http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2016/7/1450-stringer.pdf. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned Related International Patent Application PCT/US2021/042121 with similar specification, filed Jul. 17, 2021, 39 pages, VMware, Inc. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/461,908, filed Aug. 30, 2021, 60 pages, Nicira, Inc. |
Author Unknown, “CISCO Identity-Based Firewall Security,” Month Unknown 2011, 2 pages, CISCO Systems, Inc. |
Author Unknown, “Hypervisor,” Aug. 13, 2020, 1 page, VMware.com. |
Author Unknown, “Transparent,” Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), Jun. 6, 1996, 1 page, retrieved from http://foldoc.org/transparent. |
Author Unknown, “AppLogic Features,” Jul. 2007, 2 pages, 3TERA, Inc. |
Author Unknown, “Enabling Service Chaining on Cisco Nexus 1000V Series,” Month Unknown, 2012, 25 pages, CISCO. |
Author Unknown, “Next-Generation Firewalls,” Month Unknown 2013, 1 page, Palo Alto Networks. |
Basak, Debashis, et al., “Virtualizing Networking and Security in the Cloud,” Month Unknown 2010, 9 pages, VMware, Inc., Palo Alto, CA. |
Casado, Martin, et al., “Sane: A Protection Architecture for Enterprise Networks,” Proceedings of the 15th USENIX Security Symposium, Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2006, 15 pages, USENIX, Vancouver, Canada. |
Dixon, Colin, et al., “An End to the Middle,” Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, May 2009, 5 pages, USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA. |
Dumitriu, Dan Mihai, et al., (U.S. Appl. No. 61/514,990), filed Aug. 4, 2011, 31 pages. |
Guichard, J., et al., “Network Service Chaining Problem Statement,” Network Working Group, Jun. 13, 2013, 14 pages, Cisco Systems, Inc. |
Ioannidis, Sotiris, et al., “Implementing a Distributed Firewall,” CCS '00, Month Unknown 2000, 10 pages, ACM, Athens, Greece. |
Joseph, Dilip Anthony, et al., “A Policy-aware Switching Layer for Data Centers,” Jun. 24, 2008, 26 pages, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. |
Li, Junnan, et al., “DrawerPipe: A Reconfigurable Pipeline for Network Processing on FGPA-Based SmartNIC,” Electronics 2020, Dec. 10, 2019, 24 pages, retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/9/1/59. |
Litvak, Michail, “Linux—IP-RULE(8): Routing Policy Database Management,” Apr. 10, 2014, 5 pages, retrieved from https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/ip-rule.8.html. |
Mohammadkhan, Ali, et al., “PANFV: P4 Enabled NFV Systems with SmartNICs,” 2019 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN), Nov. 12-14, 2019, 7 pages, IEEE, Dallas, TX, USA. |
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 18/196,844, filed May 12, 2023, 41 pages, Nicira, Inc. |
Olds, Dan, “OS Virtualization vs. Hypervisor: Why You Should Offer Both,” Oct. 19, 2008, 3 pages, techtarget.com. |
Pagiamtzis, Kostas, et al.,“Content-Addressable Memory (CAM) Circuits and Architectures: A Tutorial and Survey,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Mar. 2006, 16 pages, vol. 41, No. 3. |
Scarfone, Karen, et al., “Guidelines on Firewalls and Firewall Policy: Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology,” Special Publication 800-41, Revision 1, Sep. 2009, 48 pages, NIST, U.S. Department of Commerce. |
Sekar, Vyas, et al., “Design and Implementation of a Consolidated Middlebox Architecture,” 9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Apr. 25-27, 2012, 14 pages, USENIX, San Jose, CA, USA. |
Sherry, Justine, et al., “Making Middleboxes Someone Else's Problem: Network Processing as a Cloud Service,” In Proc. of SIGCOMM '12, Aug. 13-17, 2012, 12 pages, Helsinki, Finland. |
Stojanovski, Nenad, et al., “Analysis of Identity Based Firewall Systems,” Jun. 2010, 9 pages. |
Stojanovski, Nenad, et al., “Architecture of a Identity Based Firewall System,” Jul. 2011, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220100544 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63084534 | Sep 2020 | US | |
63084536 | Sep 2020 | US |