Uniform dispersing of graphene nanoparticles in a host

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12195340
  • Patent Number
    12,195,340
  • Date Filed
    Saturday, March 12, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 14, 2025
    14 days ago
Abstract
The present invention includes a simple, scalable and solventless method of dispersing graphene into polymers, thereby providing a method of large-scale production of graphene-polymer composites. The composite powder can then be processed using the existing techniques such as extrusion, injection molding, and hot-pressing to produce a composites of useful shapes and sizes while keeping the advantages imparted by graphene. Composites produced require less graphene filler and are more efficient than currently used methods and is not sensitive to the host used, such composites can have broad applications depending on the host's properties.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates in general to the field of graphite, and more particularly, to compositions and methods of graphite oxide entrainment in cement and asphalt composites.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Without limiting the scope of the invention, its background is described in connection with composite materials.


Graphene is an allotrope of carbon. Graphene's purest form is a one-atom-thick planar sheet of sp2-bonded carbon atoms that are densely packed in a honeycomb or hexagonal crystal lattice. In the last few years scientists have identified multi-layer graphene oxide or a few layer of graphite oxide to be of sufficient strength and electrical conductivity to be useful as an additive in a host to provide superior mechanical, chemical, thermal, gas barrier, electrical, flame retardant and other properties compared to the native host. Improvement in the physicochemical properties of the host depends on: 1) a uniform distribution and entrainment of the graphene flake, 2) optimizing the interfacial bonding between the graphene flake and host's matrix, 3) removal of gasses entrained in the host during processing, 4) optimizing the additive's innate properties, e.g. flatness, and 5) optimizing the thickness to surface-area ratio of the graphene flake and/or the chemical functionalization or decoration on the flake/particle.


Graphene is one of the strongest materials ever tested. Various research institutes have loaded hosts with carbon allotropes such as carbon nanotubes (CNT), graphene flakes (GF), graphene oxide (GO), and graphite oxide and have seen up to a 200% increase in tensile strength in the loaded host, but with inconsistent results. Measurements have shown that graphene has a breaking strength 200 times greater than steel, with a tensile modulus (stiffness) of 1 TPa (150,000,000 psi). An atomic Force Microscope (AFM) has been used to measure the mechanical properties of a suspended graphene sheet.


Graphene sheets held together by van der Waals forces were suspended over SiO2 cavities where an AFM tip was probed to test its mechanical properties. Its spring constant was in the range 1-5 N/m and the Young's modulus was 0.5 TPa (500 GPa) thereby demonstrating that graphene can be mechanically very strong and rigid.


Depending on whether they are single walled CNTs (SWCNTs) or multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs), generally, SWCNTs have the diameter of 1-3 nm and MWCNTs have the diameters 5-50 nm. The length of CNTs can be up to centimeters, which gives an aspect ratio exceeding 1000. CNTs also exhibit extraordinary strength with moduli of elasticity on the order of TPa and tensile strength in the range of GPa. With the concurrent benefits of high aspect ratio to surface area, CNTs and MWCNTs have been found to improve the electrical, mechanical and thermal properties of the host material. However, incorporation of CNTs in composites has proven to be complex, yielding inconsistent results. Researchers have found that the addition of CNTs results in little change in strength or even deterioration of the composite. Owing to strong attractive forces between particles, CNTs tend to form agglomerates, self-attraction or self-assembly similar to that seen in carbon black creating defect sites in the composites. Non-uniform distribution/dispersion of CNT bundles is responsible for the deterioration of the host's properties.


Graphitic nanomaterials such as graphene, graphene oxide, and carbon nanotubes are currently being investigated as multifunctional polymer fillers. Because of the incredible strength, chemical stability, electrical and thermal conductivity of these materials, their incorporation into a polymer matrix increases material strength and makes otherwise electrically and thermally insulating polymers have more metal-like properties. The greatest difficulty in efficient and effective dispersion of graphene stems from its attraction to itself, leading researchers to go to great lengths to find compatible polymers. This is typically done through chemical functionalization of the graphitic surface, sacrificing the graphene's properties for compatibility.


Most recent methods of dispersing graphene and graphite oxide into host such as a polymers, metal, or ceramic center around solvent-assisted methods or melt-compounding. In a solvent-assisted dispersion of graphene, the graphene is first dispersed into a solvent, which is soluble or dissolves the target host. The solvent, that is often flammable, must then be removed. Eliminating the solvent from the process makes the process less expensive and safer.


Melt-compounding raw compound materials are typically in the form of small beads or powder and are fed from a hopper into the barrel of an extruder or hot press. In the case of an extruder, additives and fillers, such as graphene, are in the form of mixed powders prior to placing the material in the hopper. The combined material enters near the rear of the barrel and comes into contact with the screw that moves the combined material forward through the barrel. The combined material is then moved through heated sections of the barrel, which allows the combined materials to melt gradually as they are pushed through the barrel. Additional heat is generated from the intense pressure and friction inside the barrel. However, the melt-compounding process often leads to a non-uniform dispersion particularly when the additive is less than a few percent. In the case of a hot press, the powder is placed into a vessel that exposes the host material to both high temperature and pressure simultaneously. To date, the difficulty in the traditional dispersion techniques has limited the use of graphene and graphite oxide in polymers, composites and in general are limited to laboratory-scale projection.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention deals with a simple, scalable method of dispersing graphene into a host. In one embodiment, the present invention includes a method of large-scale production of graphene composites with mechanical-thermal-compounding. Graphene loaded into a host can improve the mechanical properties, and is thermally conductive and electrically conductive. This invention utilizes a jar mixing method to disperse the graphene/graphite oxide powder into a host powder to form a composite powder. The composite powder is then placed into a cold press to induce mechanical exfoliation of graphene/graphite oxide flakes and mechanochemical interaction between elements of the composite powder forming a loosely bound structure. Mechanical-thermal-compounding uses a cold press to apply pressure to form a loosely bound solid structure from the mixed powders. The compaction process induces mechanical exfoliation of graphene/graphite oxide flakes and mechanochemical interaction between elements of the powder and results in a loosely bound solid structure. This is similar to compression molding. Cold compression molding or cold molding is used in the plastic, pharmaceutical and ceramics industry industries to form tablets or preformed “biscuits” to form near net shape structures prior to sintering extrusion of melt casting. The compression molded composite powder is mechanically processed back to a powder. Subsequent cold compression molding of the composite powder improves the exfoliation of graphene/graphite oxide and mechanochemical interaction between elements in the composite powders. After the last cold compression molding and mechanical processing to a powder, the powder can be used as the source material for a composite structure. The thermal treatment can be performed by traditional processes including but not limited to compression molding with heating, hot pressing, extrusion or injection molding that results in a composite with the desired physical characteristics. The resulting composite can be molded into useful shapes and sizes while keeping the advantages imparted by graphene and graphite oxide.


In one embodiment, the present invention includes a method of making a composite of graphene/graphite oxide powder and a host powder by a solventless process comprising: cold compressing a mixture of the graphene/graphite oxide powder and the host powder to form a biscuit; crushing, powderizing, or grounding the biscuit into a powderized biscuit; and combining the powderized biscuit with an extrudable material to form a composite. In one aspect, the method further comprises a second compression molding and a second powderizing steps. In another aspect, the method further comprises the step of dispersing the graphene/graphite oxide powder into a host powder to form a composite powder prior to cold compressing the mixture. In another aspect, the method further comprises the step of dispersing the graphene/graphite oxide powder into a host powder to form a composite powder in the presence of ball bearings to break up clumps or agglomerations. In another aspect, the method further comprises a first and a second cold compression molding step, wherein the first cold compression uses a pressure of at least 1 kPa, and the second cold compression molding is at a pressure equal to or greater than 10 kPa. In another aspect, the second cold compression forms a second biscuit that is also crushed, powdered, or grounded into a second powderized biscuit prior to mixing with the extrusion material to form the composite. In another aspect, the host powder is selected from ordinary Portland cement, polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), Polycarbonate (PC), ceramic powders, ceramic powder is aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, silica, silicon dioxide, or combination thereof, metal powders, metal powders of titanium, titanium hydride, tantalum, cobalt chrome, niobium, stainless steel, nickel, copper, aluminum, or combinations thereof, a polycrystalline material, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVF), or polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), polyurethane, poly(butyleneterephthalate), nylon 11, poly(ethyleneterephthalate), poly(ether ether ketone), poly(phenylene sulfide), polyolefin, an oxide, carbonate or silicate of an element of Groups 2a, 3a, 4a and 4b of the Periodic Table, poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), poly(methylmethacrylate), polystyrene, polycarbonate/nylon alloy, polycarbonate/polyester alloy, ABS, ABS/nylon alloy, ABS/PVC alloy, acrylic copolymers, polysulfone, polysulfone/ABS alloy, polyetherimides, polyamide-imides, polyarylates, fluoropolymers, polyphenylene oxide/polystyrene blend, or poly(phenylene sulfide). In another aspect, the method further comprises the step of compression molding with heating, hot pressing, extrusion or injection molding the powderized biscuit with an extrudable material to form the composite. In another aspect, the graphene/graphite oxide flake is exfoliated to be less 10 nm during the cold compression molding process without changing the surface area of the graphene/graphite oxide flake.


Yet another embodiment of the present invention includes a method of making a graphene/graphite oxide composite from a cold compression molded powder comprising the steps of: cold compressing a mixture of the graphene/graphite oxide powder and the host powder to form a biscuit; crushing, powderizing, or grounding the biscuit into a powderized biscuit; and compression molding with heating, hot pressing, extrusion or injection molding the powderized biscuit with an extrudable material to form the composite. In one aspect, the method further comprises a second compression molding and a second powderizing steps. In another aspect, the method further comprises the step of dispersing the graphene/graphite oxide powder into a host powder to form a composite powder prior to cold compressing the mixture. In another aspect, the method further comprises the step of dispersing the graphene/graphite oxide powder into a host powder to form a composite powder in the presence of ball bearings to break up clumps or agglomerations. In another aspect, the method further comprises a first and a second cold compression molding step, wherein the first cold compression uses a pressure of at least 1 kPa, and the second cold compression molding is at a pressure equal to or greater than 10 kPa. In another aspect, the step second cold compression forms a second biscuit that is also crushed, powdered, or grounded into a second powderized biscuit prior to mixing with the extrusion material to form the composite. In another aspect, the host powder is selected from ordinary Portland cement, polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), Polycarbonate (PC), ceramic powders, ceramic powder is aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, silica, silicon dioxide, or combination thereof, metal powders, metal powders of titanium, titanium hydride, tantalum, cobalt chrome, niobium, stainless steel, nickel, copper, aluminum, or combinations thereof, a polycrystalline material, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVF), or polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), polyurethane, poly(butyleneterephthalate), nylon 11, poly(ethyleneterephthalate), poly(ether ether ketone), poly(phenylene sulfide), polyolefin, an oxide, carbonate or silicate of an element of Groups 2a, 3a, 4a and 4b of the Periodic Table, poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), poly(methylmethacrylate), polystyrene, polycarbonate/nylon alloy, polycarbonate/polyester alloy, ABS, ABS/nylon alloy, ABS/PVC alloy, acrylic copolymers, polysulfone, polysulfone/ABS alloy, polyetherimides, polyamide-imides, polyarylates, fluoropolymers, polyphenylene oxide/polystyrene blend, or poly(phenylene sulfide). In another aspect, the graphene/graphite oxide flake is exfoliated to be less 10 nm during the cold compression molding process without changing the surface area of the graphene/graphite oxide flake.


Another embodiment of the present invention includes a method of making a composite powder of a graphene/graphite oxide powder in a host powder by a solventless process comprising: dispersing the graphene/graphite oxide powder into a host powder to form a composite powder; a first cold compression molding of the composite powder to form a biscuit; crushing, powderizing, or grounding the biscuit into a powderized biscuit; and extruding the powderized biscuit into an extrudable material to form a composite, wherein the method improves the dispersion and exfoliation of the graphene/graphite oxide flakes in the composite. In one aspect, the host powder is selected from ordinary Portland cement, polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), Polycarbonate (PC), ceramic powders, ceramic powder is aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, silica, silicon dioxide, or combination thereof, metal powders, metal powders of titanium, titanium hydride, tantalum, cobalt chrome, niobium, stainless steel, nickel, copper, aluminum, or combinations thereof, a polycrystalline material, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVF), or polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), polyurethane, poly(butyleneterephthalate), nylon 11, poly(ethyleneterephthalate), poly(ether ether ketone), poly(phenylene sulfide), polyolefin, an oxide, carbonate or silicate of an element of Groups 2a, 3a, 4a and 4b of the Periodic Table, poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), poly(methylmethacrylate), polystyrene, polycarbonate/nylon alloy, polycarbonate/polyester alloy, ABS, ABS/nylon alloy, ABS/PVC alloy, acrylic copolymers, polysulfone, polysulfone/ABS alloy, polyetherimides, polyamide-imides, polyarylates, fluoropolymers, polyphenylene oxide/polystyrene blend, or poly(phenylene sulfide). In another aspect, the graphene/graphite oxide flake is exfoliated to be less 10 nm during the cold compression molding process without changing the surface area of the graphene/graphite oxide flake.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention, reference is now made to the detailed description of the invention along with the accompanying figures and in which:



FIG. 1 shows the electrical performance of the invention in two different plastics, polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) and polyurethane.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

While the making and using of various embodiments of the present invention are discussed in detail below, it should be appreciated that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention and do not delimit the scope of the invention.


To facilitate the understanding of this invention, a number of terms are defined below. Terms defined herein have meanings as commonly understood by a person of ordinary skill in the areas relevant to the present invention. Terms such as “a”, “an” and “the” are not intended to refer to only a singular entity, but include the general class of which a specific example may be used for illustration. The terminology herein is used to describe specific embodiments of the invention, but their usage does not delimit the invention, except as outlined in the claims.


The present invention uses a mixing step (e.g., mixing in a jar or jar mixing) to disperse the graphene/graphene oxide powder into a host powder to form a composite powder. The composite powder is then placed into a press for cold compression molding forming a biscuit with enhanced exfoliation of graphene/graphene oxide flakes and mechanochemical induced interaction between graphene/graphene oxide and host powder. The cold compression molding requires a pressure of at least 1 kPa to achieve exfoliation of graphene/graphene oxide flakes and mechanochemical interaction. The resulting biscuit is then crushed or ground into a more homogeneous composite powder relative to the starting powder mixture. The powderized biscuit is then placed into the cold press for a second cold compression molding at a pressure of greater than 1 kPa, preferably 10 kPa, to induce additional mechanical exfoliation of graphene/graphene oxide flakes and mechanochemical interaction forming a second biscuit structure. The cold compression molding and biscuit powderized is repeated several times. Each cold compression molding and biscuit powderized iteration improves dispersion and exfoliation of the graphene/graphene oxide flakes in the host powder. After the last cold compression molding and mechanical processing to a powder the powder can be used as the source material to for a composite structure. The composite structure has enhanced physical properties. As can be seen in FIG. 1, a dramatic enhancement in conductivity was obtained as a function of this invention relative to other materials and dispersion techniques. The enhanced conductivity is well over 100 times that of other materials and dispersion techniques in polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) and polyurethane. The thermal treatment can be performed by traditional processes including but not limited to compression molding with heating, hot pressing, extrusion or injection molding resulting in a composite with the desired physical characteristics. The resulting composite is of useful shapes and sizes while keeping the advantages imparted by graphene and graphene oxide.


In one non-limiting example, the host powder is selected from ordinary Portland cement, polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), Polycarbonate (PC), ceramic powders, ceramic powder is aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, silica, silicon dioxide, or combination thereof, metal powders, metal powders of titanium, titanium hydride, tantalum, cobalt chrome, niobium, stainless steel, nickel, copper, aluminum, or combinations thereof, a polycrystalline material, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVF), or polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), polyurethane, poly(butyleneterephthalate), nylon 11, poly(ethyleneterephthalate), poly(ether ether ketone), poly(phenylene sulfide), polyolefin, an oxide, carbonate or silicate of an element of Groups 2a, 3a, 4a and 4b of the Periodic Table, poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), poly(methylmethacrylate), polystyrene, polycarbonate/nylon alloy, polycarbonate/polyester alloy, ABS, ABS/nylon alloy, ABS/PVC alloy, acrylic copolymers, polysulfone, polysulfone/ABS alloy, polyetherimides, polyamide-imides, polyarylates, fluoropolymers, polyphenylene oxide/polystyrene blend, or poly(phenylene sulfide). The skilled artisan will recognize that these and other materials can be used in a cold compression step to capture the graphene/graphite oxide flakes and form a powder or biscuit into which the graphene/graphite oxide flakes are dispersed and from which the charge problems associated with the prior art are eliminated.


Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.


It is contemplated that any embodiment discussed in this specification can be implemented with respect to any method, kit, reagent, or composition of the invention, and vice versa. Furthermore, compositions of the invention can be used to achieve methods of the invention.


It will be understood that particular embodiments described herein are shown by way of illustration and not as limitations of the invention. The principal features of this invention can be employed in various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to the specific procedures described herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of this invention and are covered by the claims.


All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


The use of the word “a” or “an” when used in conjunction with the term “comprising” in the claims and/or the specification may mean “one,” but it is also consistent with the meaning of “one or more,” “at least one,” and “one or more than one.” The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and “and/or.” Throughout this application, the term “about” is used to indicate that a value includes the inherent variation of error for the device, the method being employed to determine the value, or the variation that exists among the study subjects.


As used in this specification and claim(s), the words “comprising” (and any form of comprising, such as “comprise” and “comprises”), “having” (and any form of having, such as “have” and “has”), “including” (and any form of including, such as “includes” and “include”) or “containing” (and any form of containing, such as “contains” and “contain”) are inclusive or open-ended and do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps. In embodiments of any of the compositions and methods provided herein, “comprising” may be replaced with “consisting essentially of” or “consisting of”. As used herein, the phrase “consisting essentially of” requires the specified integer(s) or steps as well as those that do not materially affect the character or function of the claimed invention. As used herein, the term “consisting” is used to indicate the presence of the recited integer (e.g., a feature, an element, a characteristic, a property, a method/process step or a limitation) or group of integers (e.g., feature(s), element(s), characteristic(s), propertie(s), method/process steps or limitation(s)) only.


The term “or combinations thereof” as used herein refers to all permutations and combinations of the listed items preceding the term. For example, “A, B, C, or combinations thereof” is intended to include at least one of: A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, or ABC, and if order is important in a particular context, also BA, CA, CB, CBA, BCA, ACB, BAC, or CAB. Continuing with this example, expressly included are combinations that contain repeats of one or more item or term, such as BB, AAA, AB, BBC, AAABCCCC, CBBAAA, CABABB, and so forth. The skilled artisan will understand that typically there is no limit on the number of items or terms in any combination, unless otherwise apparent from the context.


As used herein, words of approximation such as, without limitation, “about”, “substantial” or “substantially” refers to a condition that when so modified is understood to not necessarily be absolute or perfect but would be considered close enough to those of ordinary skill in the art to warrant designating the condition as being present. The extent to which the description may vary will depend on how great a change can be instituted and still have one of ordinary skilled in the art recognize the modified feature as still having the required characteristics and capabilities of the unmodified feature. In general, but subject to the preceding discussion, a numerical value herein that is modified by a word of approximation such as “about” may vary from the stated value by at least ±1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12 or 15%.


Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 CFR 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the invention(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Field of Invention,” such claims should not be limited by the language under this heading to describe the so-called technical field. Further, a description of technology in the “Background of the Invention” section is not to be construed as an admission that technology is prior art to any invention(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered a characterization of the invention(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the invention(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings set forth herein.


All of the compositions and/or methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and/or methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the method described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making a composite of graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder and a host powder by a solventless process consisting of: dispersing the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder into the host powder, wherein the graphene oxide powder comprises graphene oxide flakes or the graphite oxide powder comprises graphite oxide flakes, and wherein the host powder consists of polyurethane;cold compressing a mixture formed by dispersing the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder into the host powder to form a first biscuit, wherein the step of cold compressing the mixture uses a pressure of 1 kPa, and wherein the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder is exfoliated by the cold compressing to reduce a thickness of each graphene oxide flake or a thickness of each graphite oxide flake to less than 10 nm during the step of cold compressing the mixture without changing the surface area of each graphene oxide flake or graphite oxide flake;crushing, powderizing, or grinding the first biscuit into a first powderized biscuit;cold compressing the first powderized biscuit into a second biscuit, wherein the step of cold compressing the first powderized biscuit uses a pressure of 10 kPa;crushing, powderizing or grinding the second biscuit into a second powderized biscuit;combining the second powderized biscuit with an additional extrudable material;compression molding with heating or injection molding the second powderized biscuit with the additional extrudable material to form the composite; andshaping the composite into a specific shape.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of dispersing the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder into the host powder to form the composite powder is performed in the presence of ball bearings to break up clumps or agglomerations.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the host powder consists of polyurethane and the composite is of about 1 to 5 weight % graphite oxide or graphene oxide.
  • 4. A method of making a graphene oxide or graphite oxide composite from a cold compression molded powder consisting of: dispersing a graphene oxide powder or a graphite oxide powder into a host powder to form a composite powder, wherein the graphene oxide powder comprises graphene oxide flakes or the graphite oxide powder comprises graphite oxide flakes, and wherein the host powder consists of polyurethane;cold compressing the composite powder formed by dispersing the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder into the host powder to form a first biscuit at a pressure of 1 kPa, wherein the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder is exfoliated by the cold compressing to reduce a thickness of each graphene oxide flake or a thickness of each graphite oxide flake to less than 10 nm during the step of cold compressing the composite powder without changing the surface area of each graphene oxide flake or graphite oxide flake;crushing, powderizing, or grinding the first biscuit into a first powderized biscuit;cold compressing the first powderized biscuit into a second biscuit at a pressure of 10 kPa;crushing, powderizing or grinding the second biscuit into a second powderized biscuit; andcompression molding with heating or injection molding the second powderized biscuit with an additional extrudable material to form the composite; andshaping the composite into a specific shape.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of dispersing the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder into the host powder to form the composite powder is performed in the presence of ball bearings to break up clumps or agglomerations.
  • 6. A method of making a composite powder of a graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder in a host powder by a solventless process consisting of: dispersing the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder, wherein the graphene oxide powder comprises graphene oxide flakes or the graphite oxide powder comprises graphite oxide flakes, and wherein the host powder consists of polyurethane, into the host powder to form a composite powder;a first cold compression molding of the composite powder formed by the dispersing of the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder into the host powder to form a first biscuit, wherein the first cold compression uses a pressure of 1 kPa, and wherein the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder is exfoliated by the cold compressing to reduce a thickness of each graphene oxide flake or a thickness of each graphite oxide flake to less than 10 nm during the first cold compression molding without changing the surface area of each graphene oxide flake or graphite oxide flake;crushing, powderizing, or grinding the first biscuit into a first powderized biscuit;a second cold compression molding of the first powderized biscuit into a second biscuit, wherein the second cold compression is at a pressure of 10 kPa;crushing, powderizing or grinding the second biscuit into a second powderized biscuit;combining the second powderized biscuit with an extrudable material to form the composite powder;wherein the method improves the dispersion and exfoliation of the graphene oxide powder or graphite oxide powder in the composite powder.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2016/022229, filed on Mar. 12, 2016 claiming the priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/132,699 filed on Mar. 13, 2015, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2016/022229 3/12/2016 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2016/149150 9/22/2016 WO A
US Referenced Citations (119)
Number Name Date Kind
2459520 Greenshields Jan 1949 A
4046863 Kobayashi et al. Sep 1977 A
5057370 Krieg et al. Oct 1991 A
5360582 Boyd et al. Nov 1994 A
5501934 Sukata et al. Mar 1996 A
5506061 Kindl et al. Apr 1996 A
5509993 Hirschvogel Apr 1996 A
5583176 Häberle Dec 1996 A
5883176 Gerroir et al. Mar 1999 A
6004712 Barbetta et al. Dec 1999 A
6172163 Rein et al. Jan 2001 B1
6348279 Saito et al. Feb 2002 B1
6436567 Saito et al. Aug 2002 B1
7005205 Gyoten et al. Feb 2006 B1
7231084 Tang et al. Jun 2007 B2
7329698 Noguchi et al. Feb 2008 B2
7623340 Song et al. Nov 2009 B1
8168964 Hiura et al. May 2012 B2
8216541 Jang et al. Jul 2012 B2
8580132 Lin et al. Nov 2013 B2
9802206 Kitaura et al. Oct 2017 B2
10138969 Hattori Nov 2018 B2
10287167 Blair May 2019 B2
20020008031 Barsukov et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020119358 Rock Aug 2002 A1
20020182387 Mercuri et al. Dec 2002 A1
20040000735 Gilbert, Sr. et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040033189 Kaschak et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040071896 Kang Apr 2004 A1
20040209150 Rock et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050041373 Pruss Feb 2005 A1
20050191471 Haggquist Sep 2005 A1
20050196636 Kawakami et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050208319 Finley et al. Sep 2005 A1
20070219336 Ito Sep 2007 A1
20070284557 Gruner et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080048152 Jang et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080206124 Jang et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080277628 Zhamu Nov 2008 A1
20080279710 Zhamu et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080318110 Budinski et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090017211 Cruner et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090092747 Zhamu et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090140801 Ozyilmaz et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090215953 Hwang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090224420 Wilkinson Sep 2009 A1
20090241496 Pintault et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100006445 Tomantschger Jan 2010 A1
20100028681 Dai et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055025 Jang et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100055458 Jang et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100056819 Jang et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100092809 Drzal et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100143732 Swift et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100147188 Mamak et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100151318 Lopatin et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100209731 Humano Aug 2010 A1
20100239870 Bowen Sep 2010 A1
20100296253 Miyamoto et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100317790 Jang Dec 2010 A1
20110017585 Zhamu et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110041980 Kim et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110049437 Crain et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110088931 Lettow et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110120347 Chung May 2011 A1
20110143018 Peng et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110143107 Steinig-Nowakowski Jun 2011 A1
20110159372 Zhamu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110223405 Compton et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110256376 Compton et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110267673 Agrawal et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110274610 Paquette et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110281034 Lee et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120025131 Forero Feb 2012 A1
20120025420 Utashiro et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120055612 Ahmed et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120065309 Agrawal et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120077017 Buresch Mar 2012 A1
20120107562 Bolotin et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120129736 Tour et al. May 2012 A1
20120184065 Gharib et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120220198 Peukert et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120228555 Cheng et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120282419 Ahn et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120298396 Hong et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120298620 Jiang et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130015409 Fugetsu Jan 2013 A1
20130018204 Jeon et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130114367 Heusinger et al. May 2013 A1
20130156678 Banerjee et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130196123 Sarver Aug 2013 A1
20130217222 Johnson et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130236715 Zhamu et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130240033 Jeon et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130264041 Zhamu Oct 2013 A1
20130272950 Yun et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130330833 Ruiz et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140000751 Kagumba et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140018480 Lee et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140030590 Wang Jan 2014 A1
20140117745 Wilke et al. May 2014 A1
20140134092 Shankman May 2014 A1
20140143018 Nies et al. May 2014 A1
20140204384 Lee et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140227211 Shankman Aug 2014 A1
20140272199 Lin et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140299475 Bullington et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150266739 Zhamu et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150284253 Zhamu et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150367436 Chiu et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160002045 Blair Jan 2016 A1
20160016803 Stoltz et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160083552 Nosker Mar 2016 A1
20160144339 Kim et al. May 2016 A1
20160216629 Grinwald Jul 2016 A1
20170096600 Tour Apr 2017 A1
20170166722 Zhamu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170233290 Christiansen et al. Aug 2017 A1
20190051903 Manabe et al. Feb 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (72)
Number Date Country
101462889 Jun 2009 CN
102021633 Apr 2011 CN
102586952 Jul 2012 CN
102719719 Jul 2012 CN
103058541 Apr 2013 CN
103130436 Jun 2013 CN
103215693 Jul 2013 CN
103408880 Nov 2013 CN
103545536 Jan 2014 CN
10356997 Feb 2014 CN
103757823 Apr 2014 CN
103819915 May 2014 CN
103962102 Aug 2014 CN
104231270 Dec 2014 CN
104319372 Jan 2015 CN
104446176 Mar 2015 CN
104844930 Apr 2015 CN
104910333 Sep 2015 CN
106700356 May 2017 CN
108276576 Jul 2018 CN
0949704 Oct 1999 EP
1227531 Jul 2002 EP
2560228 Feb 2013 EP
2771395 Sep 2014 EP
2964573 Jan 2016 EP
2964574 May 2016 EP
723598 Feb 1955 GB
S6169853 Apr 1986 JP
64-009808 Jan 1989 JP
2012007224 Jan 2012 JP
2012136567 Jul 2012 JP
2016508953 Mar 2016 JP
20110119429 Nov 2011 KR
20130048741 Apr 2013 KR
10-2013-0090979 Aug 2013 KR
1020150026092 Mar 2015 KR
101625311 May 2016 KR
1020170019802 Feb 2017 KR
2456361 Jul 2012 RU
2009032069 Mar 2009 WO
2009059193 May 2009 WO
2010089326 Aug 2010 WO
2010091352 Aug 2010 WO
2011014242 Feb 2011 WO
2011074125 Jun 2011 WO
2011074125 Jun 2011 WO
2011078639 Jun 2011 WO
2011086391 Jul 2011 WO
2011087301 Jul 2011 WO
2011087301 Jul 2011 WO
2011099761 Aug 2011 WO
2011162727 Dec 2011 WO
2012058553 May 2012 WO
2012148880 Nov 2012 WO
2012177864 Dec 2012 WO
2013001266 Jan 2013 WO
2013009003 Jan 2013 WO
2013096990 Jul 2013 WO
2014080144 May 2014 WO
2014104446 Jul 2014 WO
2014138587 Sep 2014 WO
2014210584 Dec 2014 WO
2015061549 Apr 2015 WO
2015065893 May 2015 WO
2016040612 Mar 2016 WO
2016123080 Aug 2016 WO
2016154057 Sep 2016 WO
2016154057 Sep 2016 WO
2016200469 Dec 2016 WO
2017053204 Mar 2017 WO
2017154533 Sep 2017 WO
2018008143 May 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (83)
Entry
Ebinezar, et al., “Analysis of hardness test for aluminum carbon nanotube metal matrix and graphene,” Indian journal of Engineering, vol. 10, No. 21, 2014, pp. 33-39. (Year: 2014).
Kaur, S., et al., “Enhanced thermal transport at covalently functionalized carbon nanotube array interfaces,” Nature Communications, Jan. 22, 2014, pp. 1-8.
Maguire, J. A., et al., “Efficient low-temperature thermal functionalization of alkanes. Transfer dehydrogenation catalized by Rh(PMe3)2CI(CO) in solution under a high-pressure hydrogen atmosphere,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., Aug. 1, 1991, vol. 113:17, pp. 6706-6708.
Extended European Search Report for EP 16849382.3 dated Apr. 30, 2019, 10 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 17865997.5 dated Jul. 22, 2019, 7 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/051405 from KIPO dated Jan. 3, 2020, 11 pp.
Rahman, M.A., et al., “The effect of residence time on the physical characterists of PAN-based fibers produced using a solvent-free coagulation process,” Materials Science and Engineering A 448, 2007, pp. 275-280.
Wang, Q., et al., “Nanostructures and Surface Nanomechanical Properties of Polyacrylonitrile/Graphene Oxide Composite Nanofibers by Electrospinning,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013.
Xia, et al., “Effects of resin content and preparing conditions on the properties of polyphenylene sulfide resin/graphite composite for bipolar plate,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 178, Dec. 5, 2007, pp. 363-367.
Kirschner, M., “Ozone,” Ullmann's Enclyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, vol. 25, 2012, pp. 637-644.
Minus, M., et al., “The Processing, Properties, and Structure of Carbon Fibers,” JOM, Feb. 2005, pp. 52-58.
Pauling, L., General Chemistry, Chapter 15, “Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. Electrolysis,” Dover Publications, Inc., 1970, 41 pp.
Polymers: A Properties Database, “Poly(ethylene terphthalate)”, Chemnetbase, downloaded from http://poly.chemnetbase.com, Jan. 24, 2016, 5 pp.
Babak, F., et al., “Preparation and Mechanical Properties of Graphene Oxide: Cement Nanocomposites,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, ID 276323, 10 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 15834377.2 dated Mar. 9, 2018, 8 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 16780450.9 dated Jul. 13, 2018, 18 pp.
Wu, Q., et al., “Suprecapacitors Based on Flexible Graphene/Polyaniline Nanofiber Composite Films,” ACS Nano (2010), 4(4):1963-1970.
CN 102586952 Google translation 7 pp.
CN 103545536 Google translation 5 pp.
Chemical Book, <<https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB8295389.htm>>, year 2017.
Chemical Book, <<https://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductChemical PropertiesCB8123794_EN.htm>>, year 2017.
Gong, et al., “Optimization of the Reinforcement of Polymer-Based Nanocomposites with Graphene,” ECCM15-15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, Italy, Jun. 24-28, 2012.
Gulotty, R., et al., “Effects of Functionalization on Thermal Properties of Single-Wall and Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotube—Polymer Nancomposites,” UC Riverside—Polytechnic of Turin (2013), 25 pp.
Porter, Roger S. et al., “Property Opportunities with Polyolefins, A Review Preparations and Applications of High Stiffness and Strength by Uniaxial Draw,” Polymer, 35:23, 1994, pp. 4979-4984.
Song, M., et al., “The Effect of Surface Functionalization on the Immobilization of Gold Nanoparticles on Graphene Sheets,” Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 2012, Art. ID 329318, Mar. 28, 2012, 5 pp.
Zheng, H., et al., “Graphene oxide-poly (urea-formaldehyde) composites for corrosion protection of mild steel,” Corrosion Science, Apr. 27, 2018, 139, pp. 1-12.
Extended European Search Report for EP 19862892.7 dated Oct. 12, 2021, 11 pp.
Osicka, et al., “Light-Induced and Sensing Capabilities of SI-ATRP Modified Graphene Oxide particles in Elastomeric Matrix,” Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2017, vol. 10164, 1016434, doi: 10.1117/12.2260703, 10.pp.
Wang, Y., et al., “Kevlar oligomer functionalized graphene for polymer composites,” Polymer, 52, Juen 15, 2011, 3661-3670.
Extended European Search Report for EP 23154238.2 dated Jun. 13, 2023, 7 pp.
Chen, Y., et al., “Low-temperature and one-pot synthesis of sulfurized graphene nanosheets via in situ doping and their superior electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction reaction,” J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 20714, 2014.
Millipore Sigma, Product data sheet for 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone dated Feb. 16, 2018 and obtained from https://rsc.aux.eng.ufl.edu/_files/msds/2/1/-Methyl-2-pyrrolidnone.pdf, 2018.
Academic Press Dictionary of Science and Technology (“Flake”, p. 1, obtained onkine Aug. 19, 2016).
Ebinezar, et al., “Analysis of hardness test for aluminum carbon nanotube metal matrix and graphene,” Indian Journal of Engineering, vol. 10, No. 21, 2014, pp. 33-39.
Extended European Search Report and Opinion for EPO 12844344.7 dated Oct. 22, 2015, 8 pp.
Extended European Search Report and Opinion for EPO 14759787.6 dated Oct. 6, 2016, 13 pp.
Extended European Search Report and Opinion for EPO 14760912.7 dated May 11, 2016, 8 pp.
Fang, Ming et al., “Covalent polymer functionalization of graphene nanosheets and mechanical properties of composites” Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2009, vol. 19, No. 38, pp. 7098-7105.
Herman, Allen et al., “Bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells: a review.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2005, vol. 30, No. 12, pp. 1297-1302.
Hwang, T., et al., “One-step metal electroplating and patterning on a plastic substrate using an electrically-conductive layer of few-layer graphene,” Carbon, Sep. 17, 2011, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 612-621.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/061457 from KIPO dated Mar. 15, 2013, 10 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/021765 from KIPO dated Jul. 24, 2014, 11 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/021810 from KIPO dated Jul. 14, 2014, 10 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/062371 from KIPO dated Feb. 11, 2015, 12 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/045657 from KIPO dated Oct. 27, 2015, 6 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049398 from KIPO dated Dec. 16, 2015, 13 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/014873 from KIPO dated May 13, 2016, 15 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/022229 from KIPO dated Jun. 27, 2016, 15 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/023273 from KIPO dated Jul. 12, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/023435 from KIPO dated May 30, 2016, 13 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/025307 from KIPO dated Sep. 12, 2016, 11 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/025338 from KIPO dated Jul. 25, 2016, 12 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/052292 from KIPO dated Nov. 21, 2016, 14 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/027231 from KIPO dated Jul. 11, 2017, 18 pp.
Jeon, In-Yup et al., “Edge-carboxylated graphene nanosheets via ball milling.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America PNAS, Apr. 10, 2012, vol. 109, No. 15, pp. 5588-5593.
Liu, Y. B., et al., “Recent development in the fabrication of metal matrix-particulate composites using powder metallurgy techniques,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 29, No. 8, 1994, pp. 1999-2007.
McQuarrie (2011, General Chemistry (4th Edition). University Science Books, Appendix G Standard Reduction Voltages for Aqueous Solutions at 25C, p. A-34 to A-37 and also p. 949, Table 25.3. Online version available at: http://app.knovel.com/hotlink!toc/id:kpGCE00013/general-chemistry-4th/general-chemistry-4th).
Merriam-Webster (“Definition of Flake” p. 1-9, obtained online Aug. 19, 2016).
Mohajerani, E., et al., “Morphological and thickness analysis for PMMA spin coated films,” Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, vol. 9:12, Dec. 2007, p. 3901-3906.
Moustafa, S.F., et al., “Copper matrix SiC and A1203 particulate composites by powder metallurgy technique,” Materials Letters, 2002, vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 244-249.
Ong, T. S., et al., “Effect of atmosphere on the mechanical milling of natural graphite,” Carbon, 2000, vol. 38, No. 15, pp. 2077-2285.
Persulfates Technical Information, FMC, (http://ww.peroxychem.com/media/90826/aod_brochure_persulfate.pdf, downloaded on Jan. 19, 2017) 16 pp.
Rafiee, Mohammad A. et al., “Fracture and fatigue in graphene nanocomposites.” Small, 2010, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 179-183.
Steurer, Peter et al., “Functionalized graphenes and thermoplastic nanocomposites based upon expanded graphite oxide.” Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2009, vol. 30, Nos. 4-5, pp. 316-327.
Taeseon, Hwang, et al.,“One-step metal electroplating and patterning on a plastic substrate using an electrically conductive layer of few-layer graphene,” Carbon, Elsevier, Oxford, GB, vol. 50, No. 2, Sep. 8, 2011, pp. 612-621.
USP Technologies, “What is the pH of H2O2 solutions?,” http://www.h2o2.com/faqs/FaqDetail.aspx?fId=26, accessed Jan. 19, 2017, 2 pp.
Wang, Xin et al., “In situ polymerization of graphene nanosheets and polyurethane with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties.” Journal of materials Chemistry, 2011, vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 4222-4227.
Wang, Y., et al., “Electrochemical Delamination of CVD-Grown Graphene Film: Toward the Recyclable Use of Copper Catalyst,” ACS Nano, vol. 5, No. 12, Oct. 30, 2011, pp. 9927-9933.
Wu, Z-S. et al., “Field Emission of Single-Layer Films Prepared by Electrophoretic Deposition.” Advanced Materials, 21, 2009, pp. 1756-1760.
Zhao, W., et al., “Preparation of graphene by exfoliation of graphite using wet ball milling.” Journal of Materials Chemistry, Jun. 3, 2010, vol. 20, pp. 5817-5819.
Bourlinos, A.B., et al., “Graphite Oxide: Chemical Reduction to Graphite and Surface Modification with Primary Aliphatic Amines and Amino Acids,” Langmuir 2003, vol. 19, pp. 6050-6055.
Feng, H., et al., “A low-temperature method to produce highly reduced graphene oxide,” Nature Communications, Feb. 26, 2013, 8 pp.
Szabo, T., et al., “Evolution of Surface Functional Groups in a Series of Progressively Oxidized Graphite Oxides,” Chem. Mater., vol. 18, Mar. 29, 2006, pp. 2740-2749.
Extended European Search Report for EP 16765526.5 dated Feb. 13, 2018, 7 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 16769452.0 dated Mar. 1, 2018, 9 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 16780450.9 dated Apr. 19, 2018, 17 pp.
Jeon, I-Y., et al., “Large Scale Production of Edge-Selectively Functionalized Graphene Nanoplatelets via Ball Milling and Their Use as Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction,” J Am Chem Soc (2013), 135-1386-1393.
Li, Y., et al., “Hybridizing wood cellulose and graphene oxide toward high-performance fibers,” NPG Asia Materials, 7, Jan. 9, 2015, 14 pp.
Oh, Won-Chun, et al., “The Effect of Thermal and Ultrasonic Treatment on the Formation of Graphene-oxide Nanosheets,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 56, No. 4, Apr. 2010, pp. 1097-1102.
Tissera, N., et al., “Hydrophobic cotton textile surfaces using an amphiphilic graphene oxide (GO) coating,” Applied Surface Science, 324, Nov. 4, 2014 (2015), pp. 455-463.
Yuanyuan, L., et al. “Hybridizing Wood Cellulose and Graphene Oxide toward High-Performance Fibers,” NPG Asia Materials (2015) 7(e150), 14 pp.
Extended European Search Report and Opinion for EPO 17185605.7 dated Nov. 29, 2017, 7 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/058512 from KIPO dated Feb. 7, 2018, 14 pp.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180030277 A1 Feb 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62132699 Mar 2015 US