The present invention relates to an elastomeric bearing.
One goal of elastomeric spherical bearing design is the smallest/lightest package that meets the desired design life requirements. The design life is typically determined through a single motion strain. One conventional elastomeric bearing design methodology discloses how to develop a bearing with a uniform steady compression induced strain, γTc, and a uniform strain distribution for one motion pitch γθ or flap γβ. Such conventional elastomeric bearing design methodology, however, does not account for coupled load and motion or for the fatigue damage from additional motion strains. That is, the actual life of each layer is not dependent exclusively on pitch or flap strain as pressured by this conventional methodology. Furthermore, the conventional methodology generates a bearing that does not provide uniform life at each layer and may therefore result in a relatively inefficient elastomeric bearing.
An elastomeric spherical bearing according to an exemplary aspect of the present invention includes a multiple of elastomeric layers, each of said multiple of elastomeric layers having an essentially equivalent fatigue life.
A method of calculating a uniform life spherical elastomeric bearing according to an exemplary aspect of the present invention includes adjusting each layer thickness to produce a uniform fatigue life of each bearing layer.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently disclosed embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
Referring to
The hub retention member 12 includes a plurality of radial spokes 20 and shear segments 22. Each shear segment 22, in combination with its respective radial spokes 20, form a structural loop for accepting a rotor assembly yoke 24. The yoke 24 is generally C-shaped and circumscribes, in looped fashion, the respective shear segment 22. The yoke 24 is disposed in combination with a cuff structures 28 which, in turn, mount to the root end of each rotor blade assembly 14.
A spherical elastomeric bearing assembly 30 is interposed between each rotor assembly yoke 24 and the respective shear segment 22 to accommodate the multi-directional displacement of the rotor blade assembly 14.
Referring to
To the spherical surface 32s is bonded discrete spherical elastomeric elements 34 about the bearing focal point 30f. Furthermore, each spherical elastomeric element 34 includes a multiple of alternating layers (see
Each elastomeric layer 36 of the elastomeric spherical bearing 30 provides a uniform fatigue life as will be further described below. It should be understood that although a particular rotor hub application is illustrated in the disclosed non-limiting embodiment, elastomeric bearing for any application including but not limited to aerospace, heavy machinery, and civil engineering (bridges, buildings, etc.) will benefit herefrom.
Each spherical elastomeric bearing layer 36 has a fatigue curve with alternating strain (S) as the ordinate, and cycles to failure (N) as the abscissa (S-N). The fatigue life of each elastomer bearing layer 36 can be approximated from the S-N curves by the following equations (1)-(5):
Pitch Angle Motion+/−θ
where γθ equals the pitch strain as a percentage and Nθ equals the number of cycles to failure. C and α are constants (general values below) that are derived from curve fitting methods to approximate the particular S-N curve.
C ˜5000;
α ˜3.5 to 5.0
Flap Angle Motion +/−3
Coupled Tc and Flap Shear Tc·sin βi
Where γs is the shear strain
The life of a layer is calculated from the combined cumulative damage of the two motions and the shear load.
Such that fatigue life:
Referring to
Fatigue Loading:
Initial Practice Design Constraints:
First Layer:
Adjust layer thickness, t1 to obtain desired life [iterate using approach 1, “Local Flow chart Methodology” (below)].
Repeat until Pitch Strain, γθ=35% For all layers
Local Flow Chart Methodology—Approach #1—Constant +/−γθ Pitch Strain Percentage
Design Bearing for a Uniform Vibratory Pitch Shear Strain by varying the layer shear modules by:
Where
Gi is the elastomer layer shear modulus;
Gi−1 is the previous elastomer layer shear modulus (starting at the layer closest to the focal point);
Ri is the mean radius of the layer;
Ri−1 is the mean radius of the previous layer (starting at the layer closest to the focal point); and
φi=cos Ai·sin Ai2+2·cos Ai−cos Bi·sin Bi2−2·cos Bi (7)
Where Ai is the Inner Angle and Bi is the outer angle.
For a given fatigue Life
Using Equations (1)-(8)
Adjusting the layer thickness such that the actual bearing shear strain equals the above calculated shear strain constraint (equation 10), will produce a uniform fatigue life for each bearing layer.
Utilizing the Equations described above, one calculation procedure according to one non-limiting embodiment of the present invention is as follows:
It should be understood that the instructions are basically the same for a solid bearing and a bearing with a central opening. It should also be understood that an elastomeric bearing with any number of layers may be calculated by the method herein. By way of illustration, an elastomeric bearing 30A with three layers according to one non-limiting embodiment, has inputs delineated in the chart below:
To provide the following properties:
These properties provide a shear modulus and elastomer thickness by layer (
It should be understood that relative positional terms such as “forward,” “aft,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” “below,” and the like are with reference to the normal operational attitude of the vehicle and should not be considered otherwise limiting.
It should be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit from the instant invention.
Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present invention.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The disclosed embodiments of this invention have been disclosed, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For that reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
This invention was made with Government support under N00019-06-C-0081 awarded by The United States Navy. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2051864 | Knox et al. | Aug 1936 | A |
2066187 | Piron | Dec 1936 | A |
2068279 | Piron | Jan 1937 | A |
2069270 | Piron | Feb 1937 | A |
2126707 | Schmidt | Aug 1938 | A |
2127219 | Hirshfeld | Aug 1938 | A |
2149297 | Knox | Mar 1939 | A |
2158028 | Burke | May 1939 | A |
3216593 | Reuter et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3380557 | Peterson | Apr 1968 | A |
3467353 | Peterson et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3679197 | Schmidt | Jul 1972 | A |
3700352 | Gorndt | Oct 1972 | A |
3759632 | Rybicki | Sep 1973 | A |
RE30262 | Schmidt | Apr 1980 | E |
4419398 | Coffy et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
5092738 | Byrnes et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5366324 | Arlt et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5482406 | Arlt, III | Jan 1996 | A |
5601408 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5628586 | Arlt, III | May 1997 | A |
5641248 | Arlt, III | Jun 1997 | A |
5658095 | Arlt et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
6481894 | James | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6568906 | Gharibian et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6666648 | Bernhard et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6695583 | Schmaling et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6803095 | Halladay et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6860015 | Muylaert | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889965 | Loftus et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6971853 | Chemouni et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7097169 | Mueller | Aug 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
680988 | Aug 1939 | DE |
934336 | Sep 1946 | FR |
465394 | May 1937 | GB |
828065 | Feb 1960 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Aug. 28, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090162201 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |