Patent Grant
10021729
Field
This invention relates to Internet protocol (IP) transmissions and, more particularly, to uninterrupted transmission of IP transmissions containing real time transport protocol (RTP) data during endpoint changes.
Description of the Related Technology
Internet Protocol (IP) transmission systems are known to use media relays to relay IP transmissions from one endpoint to another. In a telephone system, the media relay relays IP transmissions between a caller and a callee. An IP session is established by a call controller, which interacts with the media relay, the caller and the callee to convey to each of these entities the IP addresses and ports to which they should send IP transmissions and from which they should expect IP transmissions. The media relay is configured to accept packets conveyed by IP transmissions from specified caller and callee IP addresses and ports. In some systems, such as mobile telephone systems, a mobile telephone may be in communication with a first base station while in a certain geographical area and there may be a handoff of the call to another base station when the mobile telephone is moved to a different geographical location. Communications between the base stations and the mobile telephones are conducted on a Global System from Mobile Communication (GSM) network or other cellular network, for example, and the base stations convert messages to and from the GSM network and the IP network and thus, the base stations establish the caller and callee IP addresses and ports. Each base station will have a unique IP address and UDP port number that it associates or assigns to the mobile telephone with which it has established communication in the conventional manner over the cellular network. Thus, a conventional media relay will reject IP streams from the new base station after handoff of the call because such streams are seen as being transmitted by an unauthorized source. This generally prevents voice over IP telephone calls from being made through systems that employ media relays without further call handling.
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) RFC 3261 provided by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) specifies a mechanism for an endpoint to notify another endpoint if its IP address changes. This mechanism employs a signaling message that conveys an identification of new media properties for the endpoint whose IP address has changed. The use of SIP messages for this purpose, however, adds extra overhead and delays to the call as signaling messages must be routed through the call controller and the call controller must communicate with the media relay and endpoints to re-configure the media relay to accept IP transmissions from the endpoint having the new IP address and to cause IP transmission to be relayed thereto each time a handoff occurs.
In accordance with one aspect, there is provided a method for facilitating uninterrupted transmission of Internet Protocol (IP) transmissions, during endpoint changes. The method involves, in response to receiving an IP transmission at a caller port or a callee port of a media relay through which IP transmissions of an IP communication session are relayed, locating a session information record having a caller port identifier or callee port identifier matching a destination port identifier in the IP transmission. The caller port identifier identifies the caller port and the callee port identifier identifies the callee port. When the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the caller port identifier of the session information record and when a source IP address identifier or a source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match a caller IP address identifier or the caller port identifier respectively of the session information record, and when a session identifier in the IP transmission matches a caller session identifier in the session information record, the method involves setting the source IP address identifier and the source port identifier in the IP transmission as the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the session information record. When the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the callee port identifier of the session information record, and when the source IP address identifier or the source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match a callee IP address identifier or the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record, and when the session identifier in the IP transmission matches a callee session identifier in the session information record, the method involves setting the source IP address identifier and the source port identifier of the IP transmission as the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record.
The method may involve maintaining the session information records, each record associating session information, caller information and callee information for a respective IP communication session, and the session information including the caller and callee port identifiers identifying a caller port and a callee port respectively of the media relay through which IP transmissions of the IP communication session are relayed. The caller information may include the caller IP address identifier and the caller port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the callee port are transmitted from the media relay, and a caller session identifier. The callee information may include the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the caller port are transmitted from the media relay, and may further include a callee session identifier.
The method may involve storing the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the caller session identifier field in the session information record, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the caller, and storing the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the callee session identifier field in the session information record, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the callee.
The method may involve causing the media relay to forward the IP transmission to the callee at the callee IP address and callee port identified by the callee IP address identifier and callee port identifier respectively of the session information record and identifying the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the callee with the callee port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the caller port.
The method may involve causing the media relay to forward the IP transmission to the caller at the caller IP address and caller port identified by the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the record and identifying the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the caller with the caller port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the callee port.
The session identifier may include synchronization source (SSRC) identifier, the caller session identifier may include a caller SSRC identifier and the callee session identifier may include a callee SSRC identifier.
The IP transmission may contain real time transport protocol (RTP) data, the caller port may be a caller RTP port and the callee port may be a callee RTP port.
In accordance with another aspect, there is provided a media relay apparatus for facilitating uninterrupted transmission of Internet Protocol (IP) transmissions during endpoint changes. The apparatus includes connection provisions for providing a connection to an IP network, provisions for defining a logical input/output interface defining caller and callee ports in the connection provisions. The apparatus further includes provisions for relaying IP transmissions of an IP communication session between a caller port and a callee port of the connection provisions. The apparatus further includes provisions for receiving an IP transmission at the caller port or the callee port. The apparatus further includes provisions for locating a session information record having a caller port identifier or a callee port identifier matching a destination port identifier included in the IP transmission. The caller port identifier identifies the caller port and the callee port identifier identifies the callee port. The apparatus further includes provisions for setting a source IP address identifier and a source port identifier in the IP transmission as the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the session information record when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the caller port identifier of the session information record, and when the source IP address identifier or the source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match a caller IP address identifier or the caller port identifier respectively of the session information record, and when a session identifier in the IP transmission matches a caller session identifier in the session information record. The apparatus further includes provisions for setting the source IP address identifier and the source port identifier of the IP transmission as the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the callee port identifier of the session information record, and when the source IP address identifier or the source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match a callee IP address identifier or the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record, and when the session identifier in the IP transmission matches a callee session identifier in the session information record.
The apparatus may include provisions for maintaining the session information records, each record associating session information, caller information and callee information for a respective IP communication session. The session information may include the caller and callee port identifiers identifying a caller port and a callee port respectively of the connection provisions through which IP transmissions of the IP communication session are relayed. The caller information may include the caller IP address identifier and the caller port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the callee port are transmitted from the caller port, and a caller session identifier. The callee information may include the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the caller port are transmitted from the callee port, and a callee session identifier.
The apparatus may include provisions for storing the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the caller session identifier field in one of the session information records, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the caller, and provisions for storing the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the callee session identifier field in one of the session information records, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the callee.
The apparatus may include provisions for causing the connection provisions to forward the IP transmission to the callee at the callee IP address and callee port identified by the callee IP address identifier respectively and callee port identifier of the session information record, and provisions for identifying the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the callee with the callee port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the caller port.
The apparatus may include provisions for causing the connection provisions to forward the IP transmission to the caller at the caller IP address and caller port identified by the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the session information record, and provisions for identifying the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the caller with the caller port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the callee port.
The session identifier may include synchronization source (SSRC) identifier, the caller session identifier may include a caller SSRC identifier and the callee session identifier may include a callee SSRC identifier.
The IP transmission may contain real time transport protocol (RTP) data, the caller port may be a caller RTP port and the callee port may be a callee RTP port.
In accordance with another aspect, there is provided a media relay apparatus for facilitating uninterrupted transmission of Internet protocol (IP) transmissions during endpoint changes. The apparatus includes a processor circuit operably configured to define caller and callee ports on a network and operably configured to relay IP transmissions of an IP communication session between a defined caller port and a defined callee port. The processor circuit is further configured to locate a session information record having a caller port identifier or a callee port identifier matching a destination port identifier included in the IP transmission. The caller port identifier identifies the caller port and the callee port identifier identifies the callee port. The processor circuit is further configured to set a source IP address identifier and the source port identifier in the IP transmission as the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the session information record when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the caller port identifier of the session information record, and when the source IP address identifier or a source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match a caller IP address identifier or the caller port identifier respectively of the session information record, and when a session identifier in the IP transmission matches a caller session identifier in the session information record. The apparatus further includes setting the source IP address identifier and the source port identifier of the IP transmission as the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the callee port identifier of the session information record, and when the source IP address identifier or the source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match a callee IP address identifier or the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record, and when the session identifier in the IP transmission matches a callee session identifier in the session information record.
The processor circuit may be further configured to maintain the session information records, each record associating session information, caller information and callee information for a respective IP communication session. The session information may include the caller and callee port identifiers identifying a caller port and a callee port respectively through which IP transmissions of the IP communication session to be relayed. The caller information may include the caller IP address identifier and the caller port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the callee port are transmitted from the caller port, and a caller session identifier. The callee information may include the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the caller port are transmitted from the callee port, and a callee session identifier.
The processor circuit may be further configured to store the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the caller session identifier field in the one of the session information records, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the caller, and to store the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the callee session identifier field in the session information record, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the callee.
The processor circuit may be further configured to forward the IP transmission to the callee at the callee IP address and callee port identified by the callee IP address identifier and callee port identifier respectively of the session information record, and identify the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the callee with the callee port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the caller port.
The processor circuit may be further configured to forward the IP transmission to the caller at the caller IP address and caller port identified by the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the session information record, and identify the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the caller with the caller port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the callee port.
The session identifier may include a synchronization source (SSRC) identifier, the caller session identifier may include a caller SSRC identifier and the callee session identifier may include a callee SSRC identifier.
The IP transmission may contain real time transport protocol (RTP) data and the caller port may be a caller RTP port and the callee port may be a callee RTP port.
In accordance with another aspect, there is provided a media relay apparatus for facilitating uninterrupted transmission of Internet Protocol (IP) transmissions during endpoint changes. The apparatus includes a network interface providing a connection to a network, and a processor circuit in communication with the network interface, the processor circuit including a processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium in communication with the processor. The non-transitory computer readable medium is encoded with codes for directing the processor to define caller and callee ports on the network, and to relay IP transmissions of an IP communication session between a defined caller port and a defined callee port. The codes further include codes for directing the processor to locate a session information record having a caller port identifier or a callee port identifier matching a destination port identifier included in the IP transmission. The caller port identifier identifies the caller port and the callee port identifier identifies the callee port. The codes further include codes for directing the processor to set the source IP address identifier and the source port identifier in the IP transmission as the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the session information record when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the caller port identifier of the session information record, and when a source IP address identifier or a source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match a caller IP address identifier or the caller port identifier respectively of the session information record, and when a session identifier in the IP transmission matches a caller session identifier in the session information record. The codes further include codes for directing the processor to set the source IP address identifier and the source port identifier of the IP transmission as the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the callee port identifier of the session information record, and when the source IP address identifier or the source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match a callee IP address identifier or the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record, and when the session identifier in the IP transmission matches a callee session identifier in the session information record.
The non-transitory computer readable medium may be further encoded with codes for directing the processor to maintain the session information records, each record associating session information, caller information and callee information for a respective IP communication session. The session information may include the caller and callee port identifiers identifying a caller port and a callee port respectively of the connection through which IP transmissions of the IP communication session to be relayed. The caller information may include the caller IP address identifier and the caller port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the callee port are transmitted from the caller port, and a caller session identifier. The callee information may include the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the caller port are transmitted from the callee port, and a callee session identifier.
The non-transitory computer readable medium may be further encoded with codes for directing the processor to store the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the caller session identifier field in the session information record, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the caller, and to store the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the callee session identifier field in the one of the session information records, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the callee.
The non-transitory computer readable medium may be further encoded with codes for directing the processor to forward the IP transmission to the callee at the callee IP address and callee port identified by the callee IP address identifier and callee port identifier respectively of the session information record, and to identify the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the callee with the callee port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the caller port.
The non-transitory computer readable medium may be further encoded with codes for directing the processor to forward the IP transmission to the caller at the caller IP address and caller port identified by the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the session information record, and to identify the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the caller with the caller port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the callee port.
The session identifier may include synchronization source (SSRC) identifier, the caller session identifier may include a caller SSRC identifier and the callee session identifier may include a callee SSRC identifier.
The IP transmission may contain real time transport protocol (RTP) data and the caller port may be a caller RTP port and the callee port may be a callee RTP port.
In accordance with another aspect, there is provided a non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with codes for controlling a processor of a media relay apparatus to facilitate uninterrupted transmission of Internet Protocol (IP) transmissions during endpoint changes. The codes are operable to cause the processor to cause the media relay to act as a network interface providing a connection to a network, define caller and callee ports on the network, and relay IP transmissions of an IP communication session between a defined caller port and a defined callee port. The codes are also operable to cause the processor to locate a session information record having a caller port identifier or a callee port identifier matching a destination port identifier included in the IP transmission. The caller port identifier identifies the caller port and the callee port identifier identifies the callee port. The codes are further operable to cause the processor to further set a source IP address identifier and a source port identifier in the IP transmission as a caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the session information record when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the caller port identifier of the session information record, and when a source IP address identifier or a source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match the caller IP address identifier or the caller port identifier respectively of the session information record and when a session identifier in the IP transmission matches a caller session identifier in the session information record. The codes further include codes for directing the processor to set the source IP address identifier and the source port identifier of the IP transmission as the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the callee port identifier of the session information record and when the source IP address identifier or the source port identifier in the IP transmission do not match a callee IP address identifier or the callee port identifier respectively of the session information record and when the session identifier in the IP transmission matches a callee session identifier in the session information record.
The computer readable medium may be further encoded with codes for directing the processor to maintain the session information records, each record associating session information, caller information and callee information for a respective IP communication session. The session information may include the caller and callee port identifiers identifying a caller port and a callee port respectively of the connection through which IP transmissions of the IP communication session are relayed. The caller information may include the caller IP address identifier and the caller port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the callee port are transmitted from the caller port, and a caller session identifier. The callee information may include the callee IP address identifier and the callee port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the caller port are transmitted from the callee port, and a callee session identifier.
The computer readable medium may be further encoded with codes for directing the processor to store the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the caller session identifier field in the session information record, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the caller, and store the session identifier received in the IP transmission in the callee session identifier field in the session information record, when the pre-determined IP transmission is received from the callee.
The computer readable medium may be further encoded with codes for directing the processor to forward the IP transmission to the callee at the callee IP address and callee port identified by the callee IP address identifier and callee port identifier respectively of the session information record, and to identify the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the callee with the callee port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the caller port.
The computer readable medium may be further encoded with codes for directing the processor to forward the IP transmission to the caller at the caller IP address and caller port identified by the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the session information record, and to identify the source of the IP transmission forwarded to the caller with the caller port identifier, when the IP transmission was received at the callee port.
The session identifier may include synchronization source (SSRC) identifier, the caller session identifier may include a caller SSRC identifier and the callee session identifier may include a callee SSRC identifier.
The IP transmission may contain real time transport protocol (RTP) data and the caller port may be a caller RTP port and the callee port may be a callee RTP port.
Other aspects and features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
In drawings which illustrate embodiments,
Referring to
Generally, to establish a call from the caller mobile telephone 32 to the callee mobile telephone 34, the caller mobile telephone transmits to the first base station 24 a session initiation protocol (SIP) message shown generally at 38. The SIP message 38 is transmitted from the caller mobile telephone 32 to the base station 24 and the first base station 24 formats the SIP message 38 into an IP transmission and transmits the IP transmission through the internet 28 to the RC/CC 22. In this embodiment, the first base station 24 is preconfigured with a network IP address 192.168.0.20 and universal datagram protocol (UDP) port 12345.
In response to receipt of the SIP message 38, the RC/CC 22 communicates with a media relay 40 and sends the caller IP address identifier and caller UDP port identifier contained in the SIP message to the media relay 40 to identify the IP address and UDP port to which the media relay 40 should send communications to the first base station 24 for receipt by the caller mobile telephone 32.
The media relay 40 has input/output interfaces 41 in communication with the processor to provide for physical connection to an IP network such as the internet. The media relay 40 is programmed to provide a logical input/output interface that interacts with the input/output interfaces 41 to define caller and callee real time transport protocol (RTP) ports in the conventional manner.
In response, the media relay 40 is configured to send a media relay IP address identifier and media relay RTP port identifier that it associates with the callee identified by the contents of the callee ID field in the SIP message 38. The media relay 40 sends this information to the RC/CC 22 to essentially inform the RC/CC 22 of the media relay IP address identifier and callee RTP port identifier that it should convey to the callee mobile telephone 34 so that the callee telephone can cause IP transmissions to be sent from the second base station 26 to the media relay 40 which can then subsequently forward those transmissions to the caller mobile telephone 32.
In response to receipt of the media relay IP address identifier and the callee RTP port identifier designated by the media relay 40, the RC/CC 22 transmits a SIP invite message 42 through the internet 30 to the callee mobile telephone 34 through the second base station 26. In this embodiment, the second base station 26 has an IP address (192.168.3.10) and a UDP port number (33123). Thus, the RC/CC 22 directs this SIP invite message 42 to the IP address and UDP port associated with the callee mobile telephone 34 by the second base station 26. The second base station 26 then communicates this SIP invite message 42 to the callee mobile telephone 34 over the wireless network and the callee mobile telephone 34 returns a SIP okay message 44 to the second base station 26.
The SIP okay message format is shown at 44 and includes a caller identifier (ID), a callee ID, a call ID, a callee IP address identifier and a callee UDP port identifier. The callee IP address identifier is the IP address of the second base station 26 and the callee UDP port identifier is the UDP port identifier associated with the callee mobile telephone 34 by the second base station 26. The second base station 26 sends the SIP okay message 44 in an IP transmission through the internet 30 to the RC/CC 22 which communicates the call ID, callee IP address identifier, and callee UDP port identifier contained in the SIP okay message 44 to the media relay 40 to identify to the media relay the IP address and UDP port associated with the callee. In response, the media relay 40 sends a reply message to the RC/CC 22 containing a media relay IP address identifier and caller RTP port identifier of a caller RTP port assigned by the media relay, to which the first base station 24 should direct IP transmissions to the media relay for receipt by the callee mobile telephone 34. In this embodiment, this message includes a media relay IP address identifier of 192.168.1.10 and a caller RTP port identifier (R22125).
The RC/CC 22 transmits a SIP okay message 46, having a format as shown, through the internet 28 to the first base station 24 and the first base station communicates the media relay IP address identifier and the caller RTP port identifier associated with the caller to the caller mobile telephone 32.
The above basic communications for establishing a call between the caller and callee mobile telephones 32 and 34 are described in further detail in Applicant's related International Application No. PCT/CA2007/002150. Of interest in connection with the present disclosure is the following way in which the media relay 40 is configured to permit the caller mobile telephone 32 to move to another geographical location in which a handoff occurs between the first base station 24 and the third base station 50 having an IP address identifier and UDP port identifier different from that of the first base station 24.
When a handoff from the first base station 24 to the third base station 50 occurs, the caller mobile telephone 32 ceases communication with the first base station 24 and establishes communication with the third base station 50. However, since the third base station 50 has a different IP address identifier and UDP port identifier than the first base station 24, the media relay 40 will receive IP transmissions from the third base station 50 identifying the source of the transmissions with a different IP address identifier and UDP port identifier than those associated with the first base station. Normally, the media relay 40 would reject such communications as being from an unknown source, however, due to the configuration of the media relay described below, IP transmissions from the third base station 50 are not rejected and the call can continue uninterrupted. To facilitate this, the media relay 40 is configured with additional functionality beyond that which merely relays communications between the caller and callee.
It is known that in general, a media relay 40 includes a processor 52, memory 54 operable to be written to and read by the processor 52, and program memory 56 containing codes readable by the processor 52 that define program instructions for directing the processor 52 to carry out conventional media relay functions for transferring IP transmissions between the caller and the callee. In order to provide the functionality of the present disclosure, in this embodiment, the media relay 40 is further configured with additional codes shown generally at 58 that direct the processor 52 to carry out the functionality described below and include functionality for configuring the memory 54 to include call records 60.
These additional codes 58 may be stored on a computer readable medium such as a CD-ROM, flash drive, or in memory at a remotely located computer and may be downloaded to the program memory 56 or the media relay 40 in a conventional manner, for example.
Referring to
The caller information 64 includes a caller IP address identifier field 72 and a caller UDP port identifier field 74 that hold a caller IP address identifier and caller UDP port identifier to which IP transmissions received at the callee RTP port are to be transmitted. In this embodiment, the caller IP address identifier is 192.168.0.20 and the caller UDP port identifier is 12345 and correspond to those of the first base station 24, i.e., that associated with the caller. The caller information 64 further includes a caller sync source (SSRC) identifier field 76 for storing a caller sync source identifier associated with the caller side of the IP communication session. In one embodiment, until a pre-determined packet such as a first packet, for example, is received in connection with the call, this caller SSRC identifier is undefined.
In the embodiment shown, the caller information 64 further includes a packets sent field 78 and a packets received field 80 for holding numbers representing the number of packets sent to and received respectively from the caller although these fields are optional and the contents of these fields may be available from other functions on the media relay 40.
Referring to
In this embodiment, the callee information 66 also includes a packets sent field 88 and a packets received field 90 for storing numbers indicating the number of packets sent to and received from the caller. The call record 60 is populated with the information shown in
Referring back to
Referring to
In
Referring back to
Referring to
Referring back to
Referring to
Referring to
The identification of whether or not the IP transmission 110 is from the caller or callee can occur in a number of ways. One way, for example, is for the processor 52 to be responsive to interrupt signals that may be produced by the input/output interface circuitry 41 that physically implements the interface between the media relay 40 and the internet. Since the caller RTP port and callee RTP port have different port identifiers, the input/output interface circuitry 41 may identify the port which has received an IP transmission 110 and cause an interrupt signal and perhaps an interrupt handler (not shown) to be executed by the processor 52 in order to identify the specific port which has received the IP transmission 110.
Alternatively, when the processor 52 identifies the call record 60 by matching the destination port identifier received from the IP transmission 110 with at least one of the caller RTP port identifier and callee RTP port identifier in a call record, the matching RTP port identifier is inherently identified and this information can be used to identify the specific port that has received the IP transmission 110. A flag (not shown) may be set for example, to identify whether the IP transmission 110 is from the caller or callee, depending on whether there is a match of the destination port identifier with the callee or caller RTP identifier. Thus, if there is a match of the destination port identifier with the callee RTP port identifier, then the source must be the caller and if there is a match of the destination port identifier with the caller RTP port identifier, then the source must be the callee.
Thus, if a flag is used, block 140 can simply cause the processor 52 to read the flag to determine whether or not the IP transmission 110 is received from the caller or callee.
Assuming the IP transmission 110 is received from the caller, optionally, block 142 can direct the processor 52 to determine whether or not a pre-determined packet has been received. In this embodiment, the pre-determined packet is the first packet and thus can be determined by simply reading the contents of the packets received field 80 in the caller information 64 of the call record 60 identified at block 132 of the authentication routine 102. Alternatively, the low level processing codes 100 may have previously stored the number of packets received in some other location readable by the processor 52 for use at this stage.
In this embodiment, the first packet received from the caller is the pre-determined packet and thus, when the first packet is received, block 144 directs the processor 52 to store the SSRC identifier received in the IP transmission 110 in the caller SSRC field 76 associated with the caller information 64 of the call record 60 as shown at 146 in
If at block 147 the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier do not match the source IP address identifier and source port identifier, then the IP transmission 110 is deemed to be originating from a different source (i.e. the third base station 50) in which case block 148 directs the processor 52 to determine whether or not the IP transmission is associated with the call represented by the call record 60. To do this, block 148 directs the processor 52 to determine whether the SSRC identifier received in the IP transmission 110 matches the caller SSRC identifier stored in the caller sync source field 76 of the call record 60 shown in
If the SSRC received in the IP transmission 110 matches the caller SSRC stored in the caller sync source field 76 of the call record 60, block 150 directs the processor 52 to copy the source IP address identifier and source port identifier respectively to the caller IP address identifier and caller UDP port identifier fields 72 and 74 respectively of the call record 60 to update the call record to identify the IP address and UDP port of the third base station 50 as that of the caller, as shown in
Thus, in an IP transmission 110 received subsequent to the pre-determined transmission, or where there is no determination of whether the transmission is a pre-determined one, the source IP address identifier and source port identifier from the IP transmission 110 are set as the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the call record 60 when the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier of the record do not match the source IP address identifier and source port identifier respectively of the IP transmission 110 and the received SSRC in the IP transmission matches the caller SSRC identifier of the call record.
Similarly, blocks 152, 154, 156, 158, and 160 function to perform similar functionality when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission 110 matches the callee RTP port identifier of the identified call record 60. In this case where there is a determination of whether the transmission is a pre-determined one, if the IP transmission is the pre-determined transmission, the SSRC identifier received in the IP transmission 110 is set as the callee SSRC identifier associated with the callee information 66 of the record 60 and if the IP transmission is received subsequent to the pre-determined transmission, or where there is no determination of whether the transmission is a pre-determined one, the source IP address identifier and source port identifier from the IP transmission are set as the callee IP address identifier and callee port identifier respectively of the record when the callee IP address identifier and callee port identifier do not match the source IP address identifier and source port identifier respectively and the received SSRC identifier in the IP transmission matches the callee SSRC identifier.
Referring to
If the IP transmission 110 has been received at the caller RTP port, block 172 directs the processor 52 to transmit the IP transmission from the caller RTP port to the callee IP address and callee UDP port identified by the callee IP address identifier and callee UDP port identifier in the call record 60 and to identify the source IP address and source port of the IP transmission as the media relay IP address and callee RTP port. If on the other hand, the IP transmission 110 was received at the callee RTP port, block 174 directs the processor 52 to transmit the IP transmission from the callee RTP port to the caller IP address identified by the caller IP address identifier and caller UDP port identifier stored in the call record 60 and identify the source IP address and source port of the IP transmission as the media relay IP address and caller RTP port. The IP transmission 110 received at either port is thus relayed by the media relay 40 according to the contents of the call record 60 as previously established by the continuity routine 104 shown in
It will be appreciated that in this embodiment, the IP transmissions 110 received from the caller and from the callee may have different SSRC identifiers. Alternatively, they may have the same SSRC identifiers.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/092,831, filed Nov. 27, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/496,864, filed Mar. 16, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,675,566, entitled “Uninterrupted Transmission of Internet Protocol Transmissions During Endpoint Changes”, which is a national phase entry of PCT/CA2009/001317, filed Sep. 17, 2009, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4747124 | Ladd | May 1988 | A |
| 4916491 | Katoh | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4992971 | Hayashi | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5146491 | Silver et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5247571 | Kay et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5303297 | Hillis | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5325421 | Hou et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5359642 | Castro | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5425085 | Weinberger et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5440621 | Castro | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5454030 | de Oliveira et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5469497 | Pierce et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5506893 | Buscher et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5519769 | Weinberger et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5559871 | Smith | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5590133 | Billstrom et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5602907 | Hata et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608786 | Gordon | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5621787 | McKoy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5633913 | Talarmo | May 1997 | A |
| 5661790 | Hsu | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5677955 | Doggett et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5712907 | Wegner et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719926 | Hill | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5722067 | Fougnies et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724355 | Bruno et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5726984 | Kubler et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737414 | Walker et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742596 | Baratz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5751961 | Smyk | May 1998 | A |
| 5768521 | Dedrick | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5793762 | Penners et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799072 | Vulcan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5802502 | Gell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5825863 | Walker | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828740 | Khuc et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5838682 | Dekelbaum et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845267 | Ronen | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850433 | Rondeau | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5864610 | Ronen | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5883810 | Franklin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5883891 | Williams et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889774 | Mirashrafi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5905736 | Ronen et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5907547 | Foladare et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5910946 | Csapo | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5915005 | He | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5915093 | Berlin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917899 | Moss et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5923659 | Curry et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930343 | Vasquez | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5937045 | Yaoya et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940598 | Strauss et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5953504 | Sokal et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956391 | Melen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970477 | Roden | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974043 | Solomon | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5991291 | Asai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991378 | Apel | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005870 | Leung et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005926 | Mashinsky | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014379 | White et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021126 | White et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6029062 | Hanson | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6036090 | Rahman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6052445 | Bashoura et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058300 | Hanson | May 2000 | A |
| 6069890 | White et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6073013 | Agre et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078647 | D'Eletto | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6104704 | Buhler et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6104711 | Voit | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115737 | Ely et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128304 | Gardell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6137869 | Voit et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141404 | Westerlage et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151385 | Reich et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6173272 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185414 | Brunner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6188752 | Lesley | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6236851 | Fougnies et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240449 | Nadeau | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6243689 | Norton | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249573 | Hudson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6282574 | Voit | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6298062 | Gardell et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6298250 | Nilsson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310859 | Morita et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6327351 | Walker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6351464 | Galvin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6359880 | Curry et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6430275 | Voit et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434143 | Donovan | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445694 | Swartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6507644 | Henderson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6553025 | Kung et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6560224 | Kung et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6574328 | Wood et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6594254 | Kelly | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597686 | Smyk | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597783 | Tada et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6603977 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6636833 | Flitcroft et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6650641 | Albert et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6674745 | Schuster et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6674850 | Vu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6724860 | Stumer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6744858 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6760324 | Scott et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6766159 | Lindholm | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6772188 | Cloutier | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6775534 | Lindgren et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6785266 | Swartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6798767 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6819929 | Antonucci et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6873599 | Han | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6892184 | Komem et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6934279 | Sollee et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6937713 | Kung et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6947531 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6954453 | Schindler et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6961334 | Kaczmarczyk | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6963557 | Knox | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6963739 | Dorenbosch et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6985440 | Albert et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6993015 | Kobayashi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7006508 | Bondy et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7010727 | Stucker | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7027564 | James | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7042985 | Wright | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7046658 | Kundaje | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7051072 | Stewart et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7055174 | Cope et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7068668 | Feuer | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7068772 | Widger et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7079526 | Wipliez et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7120682 | Salama | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7151772 | Kalmanek, Jr. et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7174156 | Mangal | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7177399 | Dawson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7203478 | Benco et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7212522 | Shankar et | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7218722 | Turner et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7277528 | Rao et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7330835 | Deggendorf | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7366157 | Valentine et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7400881 | Kallio | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7426492 | Bishop et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7436835 | Castleberry et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7437665 | Perham | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7440441 | Lakhani et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7440442 | Grabelsky et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7447707 | Gaurav et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7454200 | Cai et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7454510 | Kleyman et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7457865 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7477843 | Peeters et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7486664 | Swartz | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7486667 | Feuer | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7486684 | Chu et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7512117 | Swartz | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7545761 | Kalbag | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7565131 | Rollender | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7573982 | Breen et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7580886 | Schulz | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7587036 | Wood et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7593390 | Lebizay | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7593884 | Rothman et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7599944 | Gaurav et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7639792 | Qiu et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7644037 | Ostrovsky | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7647500 | Machiraju et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7657011 | Zielinski et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7664495 | Bonner et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7676215 | Chin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7676431 | O'Leary et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7680114 | Yazaki et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7680737 | Smith et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7702308 | Rollender | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7715413 | Vaziri et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7715821 | Rollender | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7734544 | Schleicher | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7738384 | Pelletier | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7764777 | Wood et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7764944 | Rollender | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765261 | Kropivny | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765266 | Kropivny | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7774711 | Valeski | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7797459 | Roy et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7882011 | Sandhu et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7894441 | Yazaki et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7899742 | Benkert et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7907551 | Croy et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7907714 | Baniak et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7929955 | Bonner | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7944909 | James | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7950046 | Kropivny | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7958233 | Gutierrez | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7965645 | Pelletier | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7979529 | Kreusch et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7995589 | Sollee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8024785 | Andress et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8027333 | Grabelsky et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8036366 | Chu | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8041022 | Andreasen et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8050273 | Gass | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8060887 | Kropivny | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8078164 | Ganesan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8111690 | Hussain et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8116307 | Thesayi et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8125982 | Feuer | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8127005 | Gutierrez | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8145182 | Rudolf et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8161078 | Gaurav et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8166533 | Yuan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8166547 | Bevan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8189568 | Qiu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8190739 | Gutierrez | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8200575 | Torres et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8204044 | Lebizay | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8219115 | Nelissen | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8223927 | Di Serio et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8228837 | Sheriff et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8228897 | Mitchell | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8243730 | Wong et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8244204 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8275404 | Berger et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8300632 | Davis et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8306063 | Erdal et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8315521 | Leiden et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8363647 | Fangman et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8364172 | Guanfeng et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8396445 | Crawford et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8410907 | Twitchell, Jr. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8417791 | Peretz et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8422507 | Björsell et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8423791 | Yu et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8427981 | Wyss et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8437340 | James | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8462915 | Breen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8468196 | Roskind et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8493931 | Nix | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8509225 | Grabelsky et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8526306 | Jungck et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8532075 | Rassool et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8537805 | Björsell et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8542815 | Perreault et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8543477 | Love et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8594298 | Klein et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8599747 | Saleem et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8599837 | Kyle | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8605714 | Lebizay | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8605869 | Mobarak et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8607323 | Yuan | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8611354 | Keränen et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8625578 | Roy et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8627211 | Kropivny | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8630234 | Björsell et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8634838 | Hellwig et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8675566 | Huttunen | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8682919 | Golliher | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8702505 | Kropivny | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8713098 | Adya et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8724643 | Feuer | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8749610 | Gossweiler et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8750290 | Vance et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8763081 | Bogdanovic et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8767717 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8768951 | Crago | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8774171 | Mitchell | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8774378 | Björsell et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8774721 | Hertel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8780703 | Eidelson et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8792374 | Jain et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8792905 | Li et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8804705 | Fangman et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8805345 | Ling et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8810392 | Teller et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8819566 | Mehin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8837360 | Mishra et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8838539 | Ashcraft et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8848887 | Willman | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8862701 | Havriluk | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8885609 | Nix | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8903051 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8903360 | Celi, Jr. et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8909556 | Huxham | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8938209 | Crawford et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8938534 | Le et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8948061 | Sridhar | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8972612 | Le et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8982719 | Seetharaman et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8995428 | Haster | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9003306 | Mehin et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9137385 | Björsell et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9143608 | Björsell et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9154417 | Huttunen | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9179005 | Perreault et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9432830 | Lahtiranta et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9537762 | Perreault et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9549071 | Björsell et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9565307 | Björsell et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9813330 | Perreault et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9826002 | Perreault et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 20010027478 | Meier et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010052081 | McKibben et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002041 | Lindgren et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020018445 | Kobayashi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020051518 | Bondy et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020057764 | Salvucci et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068545 | Oyama et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116464 | Mak | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122391 | Shalit | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122547 | Hinchey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020141352 | Fangman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020150080 | Bhattacharya et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030008635 | Ung et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030012196 | Ramakrishnan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043974 | Emerson, III | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030095539 | Feuer | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121967 | Goldberg et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179747 | Pyke et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200311 | Baum | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211840 | Castrogiovanni et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030219103 | Rao et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040009761 | Money et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040019539 | Raman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040022237 | Elliott et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034793 | Yuan | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040157629 | Kallio et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165709 | Pence et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181599 | Kreusch et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202295 | Shen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203565 | Chin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203582 | Dorenbosch et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218748 | Fisher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240439 | Castleberry et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255126 | Reith | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050007999 | Becker et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021939 | Le et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050025043 | Mussman et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050063519 | James | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069097 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050083911 | Grabelsky et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050094651 | Lutz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131813 | Gallagher et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169248 | Truesdale et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171898 | Bishop et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050174937 | Scoggins et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177843 | Williams | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188081 | Gibson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190892 | Dawson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192897 | Rogers et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192901 | McCoy et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198499 | Salapaka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050202799 | Rollender | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222952 | Garrett et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267842 | Weichert et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050287979 | Rollender | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060006224 | Modi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060007940 | Sollee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060013266 | Vega-Garcia et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025122 | Harris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030290 | Rudolf et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036522 | Perham | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060072547 | Florkey et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060072550 | Davis et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078094 | Breen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093135 | Fiatal et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095320 | Jones | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060109960 | D'Evelyn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060111116 | Palmer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116892 | Grimes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142011 | Kallio | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146797 | Lebizay | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060153342 | Sasaki | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060160565 | Singh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177035 | Cope et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189303 | Rollender | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195398 | Dheer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195584 | Baumann | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205383 | Rollender | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209768 | Yan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233317 | Coster et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248186 | Smith | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060251056 | Feuer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258328 | Godoy | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264200 | Laiho et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268921 | Ekstrom et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281437 | Cook | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070016524 | Diveley et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036139 | Patel et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036143 | Alt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047548 | Yazaki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070053382 | Bevan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070064919 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070092070 | Croy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112964 | Guedalia et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115935 | Qiu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121590 | Turner et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121593 | Vance et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121602 | Sin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127676 | Khadri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070174469 | Andress et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070217354 | Buckley | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220038 | Crago | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253418 | Shiri et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253429 | James | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070263609 | Mitchell | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070297376 | Gass | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080013523 | Nambakkam | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037715 | Prozeniuk et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080043718 | Chu | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080056235 | Albina et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080056243 | Roy et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080056302 | Erdal et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063153 | Krivorot et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080160953 | Mia et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080166999 | Guedalia et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080167019 | Guedalia et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080167020 | Guedalia et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080167039 | Guedalia et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080187122 | Baker | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080188198 | Patel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080188227 | Guedalia et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080205378 | Wyss et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080310599 | Purnadi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090003535 | Grabelsky et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090012851 | Marc | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090017842 | Fukasaku | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090028146 | Kleyman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129566 | Feuer | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135724 | Zhang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135735 | Zhang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090141883 | Bastien | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090213839 | Davis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090214000 | Patel et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090238168 | Lavoie et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090268615 | Pelletier | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292539 | Jaroker | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090296900 | Breen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325558 | Pridmore et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100002701 | Hsieh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100008345 | Lebizay | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100039946 | Imbimbo et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100083364 | Gutierrez | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100086119 | De Luca et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100105379 | Bonner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114896 | Clark et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100115018 | Yoon et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128729 | Yazaki et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142382 | Jungck et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100150138 | Björsell et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100150328 | Perreault et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172345 | Björsell et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177671 | Qiu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100220852 | Willman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100233991 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100246589 | Pelletier | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272242 | Croy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100278534 | Leiden et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316195 | Di Serio et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110013541 | Croy et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110072095 | Havriluk | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110122827 | Björsell et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110153809 | Ghanem et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167164 | Gutierrez | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110176541 | James | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110201321 | Bonner | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208859 | Gutierrez | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110235543 | Seetharaman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255553 | Bobba et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110261717 | Akuzuwa et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267986 | Grabelsky et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110273526 | Mehin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276903 | Mehin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276904 | Mehin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110292929 | Haster | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120014383 | Geromel et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089717 | Chen | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120096145 | Le et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120099599 | Keränen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120113981 | Feuer | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120155333 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120170574 | Huttunen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120195236 | Knight | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120195415 | Wyss et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120227101 | Yuan | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120250624 | Lebizay | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120259975 | Le et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120270554 | Hellwig et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120282881 | Mitchell | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314699 | Qiu et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130039226 | Sridhar | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130097308 | Le et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130114589 | Fangman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128879 | Kyle | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130148549 | Crawford et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130173534 | Nelakonda et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130223276 | Padgett | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130229950 | Björsell et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130237198 | Vashi et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130254301 | Lin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130272297 | Breen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130281147 | Denman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287006 | Nix | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310002 | Celi, Jr. et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130318166 | Jungck et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130329722 | Perrault et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130329864 | Björsell et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140010119 | Björsell et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140016764 | Björsell et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140024367 | Björsell et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140101749 | Yuan | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140141884 | Kropivny | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153477 | Huttunen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140211789 | Feuer | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140215642 | Huxham | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140220944 | Balasubramanian | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140244393 | Rimmer et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140247730 | Thota et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140269624 | Khay-Ibbat et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140307858 | Li et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140321333 | Björsell et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324969 | Riddle | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140337961 | Chien et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140337962 | Brandstatter | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140349602 | Majumdar et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150327320 | Huttunen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150358470 | Björsell et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160006882 | Björsell et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160028619 | Perreault et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20170104868 | Björsell et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170111265 | Perreault et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170126752 | Perreault et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170142256 | Björsell et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| PI 0718312-7 | Nov 2013 | BR |
| PI 0719682-2 | Jan 2014 | BR |
| 2 218 216 | Oct 1997 | CA |
| 2249668 | Apr 1999 | CA |
| 2 299 037 | Aug 2000 | CA |
| 2 437 275 | Oct 2002 | CA |
| 2598200 | Feb 2008 | CA |
| 2668025 | May 2008 | CA |
| 2670510 | Jun 2008 | CA |
| 2 681 984 | Oct 2008 | CA |
| 2 690 236 | Dec 2008 | CA |
| 2 659 007 | Sep 2009 | CA |
| 2732148 | Feb 2010 | CA |
| 2 778 905 | Aug 2010 | CA |
| 2812174 | Mar 2011 | CA |
| 1498029 | May 2004 | CN |
| 1498482 | May 2004 | CN |
| 1668137 | Sep 2005 | CN |
| 1274114 | Sep 2006 | CN |
| 101005503 | Jul 2007 | CN |
| 101069390 | Nov 2007 | CN |
| 101095329 | Dec 2007 | CN |
| 101584150 | Nov 2009 | CN |
| 101584166 | Nov 2009 | CN |
| 101605342 | Nov 2009 | CN |
| 1498029 | May 2010 | CN |
| 101772929 | Jul 2010 | CN |
| 101069390 | Dec 2010 | CN |
| 102137024 | Jul 2011 | CN |
| 102457494 | May 2012 | CN |
| 102484656 | May 2012 | CN |
| 102572123 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 101095329 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 101605342 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 102633232 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 101005503 | Jan 2013 | CN |
| 101772929 | Jul 2014 | CN |
| 102457494 | Oct 2014 | CN |
| 602 01 827 | Nov 2005 | DE |
| 11 2005 003 306 | Jan 2008 | DE |
| 601 33 316 | Jul 2008 | DE |
| 603 17 751 | Nov 2008 | DE |
| 0 841 832 | May 1998 | EP |
| 0 841 832 | May 1999 | EP |
| 1 032 224 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1 032 224 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1 244 250 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1 266 516 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1 362 456 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1 371 173 | Dec 2003 | EP |
| 1 389 862 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1 411 743 | Apr 2004 | EP |
| 1 389 862 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1 526 697 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1 362 456 | May 2005 | EP |
| 1 575 327 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 1 610 583 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 1 526 697 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 1 721 446 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 1 829 300 | Sep 2007 | EP |
| 1 371 173 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 1 411 743 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 1 362 456 | Mar 2008 | EP |
| 1 974 304 | Oct 2008 | EP |
| 1 974 304 | Oct 2008 | EP |
| 1 610 583 | Aug 2009 | EP |
| 2 084 868 | Aug 2009 | EP |
| 2 090 024 | Aug 2009 | EP |
| 2 127 232 | Dec 2009 | EP |
| 2 165 489 | Mar 2010 | EP |
| 2 215 755 | Aug 2010 | EP |
| 2 227 048 | Sep 2010 | EP |
| 2 127 232 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 2 165 489 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 2 311 292 | Apr 2011 | EP |
| 1 829 300 | May 2012 | EP |
| 2 449 749 | May 2012 | EP |
| 2 478 678 | Jul 2012 | EP |
| 2 215 755 | Oct 2012 | EP |
| 1 829 300 | Nov 2012 | EP |
| 2 449 749 | Mar 2014 | EP |
| 1 266 516 | May 2014 | EP |
| 2 332 337 | Jun 1999 | GB |
| W00200902627 | Sep 2009 | ID |
| 242009 | Jun 2009 | IN |
| 292009 | Jul 2009 | IN |
| 287412 | Sep 2017 | IN |
| 2011-199384 | Oct 2011 | JP |
| 10-2009-0086428 | Aug 2009 | KR |
| 10-2009-0095621 | Sep 2009 | KR |
| 2009004811 | Aug 2009 | MX |
| 2009005751 | Aug 2009 | MX |
| 151991 | Jun 2009 | SG |
| 152752 | Jun 2009 | SG |
| 155474 | Oct 2009 | SG |
| WO 0150693 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0169899 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 0169899 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 0180587 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 02082728 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 02082782 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 02082782 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 03027801 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005084002 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006067269 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006072099 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006078175 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006078175 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007044454 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007056158 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007087077 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007087077 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008027065 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008052340 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008064481 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008085614 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008085614 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008086350 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008086350 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008103652 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008085614 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008116296 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008151406 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008151406 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009070202 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009070278 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010012090 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011000405 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011032256 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 0189145 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| WO 2013013189 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013120069 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014066155 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014117599 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014166258 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Abrazhevich, Dennis. “Electronic Payment Systems: a User-Centered Perspective and Interaction Design,” Thesis under the auspices of the J.F. Schouten School for User-System Interaction Research, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2004, pp. Cover page-p. 189. |
| Baker et al., “Cisco Support for Lawful Intercept in IP Networks,” Internet Draft—working document of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), accessible at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/lid-abstracts.txt, Apr. 2003, expires Sep. 30, 2003, pp. 1-15. |
| F. Baker et al. “RFC 3924—Cisco Architecture for Lawful Intercept in IP Networks.” Oct. 2004. |
| Bhushan et al., “Federated Accounting: Service Charging and Billing in a Business-to-Business Environment,” 0-7803-6719-7/01, © 2001 IEEE, pp. 107-121. |
| Cisco, “Lawful Intercept Requirements Summary,” http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3924.html. Nov. 8, 2006. |
| DOTS IP Address Validation, “Overview”, http://www.serviceobjects.com/products/dots_ipgeo.asp; printed Jun. 21, 2012. |
| DOTS Phone Exchange, “Overview”, http://www.serviceobjects.com/demos/PhoneExchangeDemo.asp (URL no longer valid, current URL is http://www.serviceobjects.com/products/phone/phone-exchange); printed Jun. 21, 2012. |
| ETSI Technical Specification. “Lawful Interception (LI); Handover Interface and Service-Specific Details (SSD) for IP delivery; Part 5: Service-specific details for IP Multimedia Services.” Apr. 2008, 25 pgs, v.2.3.1, France. |
| Handley, M. et al. “RFC 2543—SIP: Session Initiation Protocol.” Mar. 1999. |
| IETF ENUM WG R STASTNY OEFEG Informational Numbering for VOIP and Other IP Communications: “Numbering for VIOP and other IP Communications, draft-stastny-enum-numbering-voip-00.txt”, Oct. 1, 2003, pp. 1-43, XP015035676, ISSN: 0000-0004. |
| IP2Location, http://www.ip2location.com/; printed Jun. 20, 2012. |
| ETSI TS 122 173 V12.7,0 (Oct. 2014) Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Technical Specification 8.2,2.3—interoperability with PSTN/ISDN and mobile CS Networks, Contents and Forward, pp. 1-9; Sec. 8, pp. 14-17. |
| Huitema et al., “Architecture for Internet Telephony Service for Residential Customers,” Academic Paper for Bellcore, Mar. 2, 1999, pp. 1-14. |
| Jajszczyk et al., “Emergency Calls in Flow-Aware Networks,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 11, No. 9, Sep. 2007, pp. 753-755. |
| Ketchpel et al. “U-PAI: A universal payment application interface” Second USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce Proceedings, Aug. 1996, pp. 1-17. |
| Kim et al., “An Enhanced VoIP Emergency Services Prototype,” Proceedings of the 3rd International ISCRAM Conference (B. Van de Walle and M. Turoff, eds.), Newark, NJ (USA), May 2006, pp. 1-8. |
| Kornfeld et al,, “DVB-H and IP Datacast—Broadcast to Handheld Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 53, No. 1, Mar. 2007, pp. 161-170. |
| Kortebi et al., “SINR-Based Routing in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks to Improve VoIP Applications Support,” 1-4244-0667-6/07, © 2007 IEEE, pp. 491-496. |
| Lee et al., “VoIP Interoperation with KT-NGN,” in The 6th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, Technical Proceedings, 2004, pp. 126-128, accompanied by Title and Contents—4 pages. |
| Lin et al., “Effective VoIP Coil Routng in WLAN and Celular Integration,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 9, No. 10, Oct. 2005, pp. 874-376. |
| Lind AT&T S: “ENUM Call Flows for VoIP Interworking; draft-lind-enum-callflows-03.txt”, Feb. 1, 2002, No. 3, Feb. 1, 2002, pp. 1-17, XP015004214, ISSN: 0000-0004. |
| List of North American Numbering Plan area codes, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NANP_area_codes; printed Jun. 20, 2012. |
| Ma et al., “Realizing MPEG4 Video Transmission Based on Mobile Station over GPRS,” 0-7803-9335-X/05, © 2005 IEEE, pp. 1241-1244. |
| Mintz-Habib et al., “A VoIP Emergency Services Architecture and Prototype,” {mm2571,asr,hgs,xiaotaow}@cs.columbia.edu, 0-7803-9428-3/05, © 2005 IEEE, pp. 523-528. |
| Moberg & Drummond, “MIME-Based Secure Peer-to-Peer Business Data Interchange Using HTTP, Applicability Statement 2 (AS2),” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 4130, Category: Standards Track, Copyright © The Internet Society Jul. 2005, pp. 1-47. |
| Munir, Muhammad Farukh, “Study of an Adaptive Scheme for Voice Transmission on IP in a Wireless Networking Environment 802.11e,” Dept. of Networks and Distributed Computing, Ecole Supérieure En Sciences Informatiques (ESSI), Université De Nice, Jun. 2005, (pp. 1-35),—pp. 1-11. |
| Rosenberg, et al.; “RFC 3261—SIP: Session Initiation Protocol”, Jun. 2002. |
| Sippy SIP B2BUA. “About Sippy RTPproxy.” http://www.rtpproxy.org. Jul. 15, 2009. |
| Sripanidkulchai et al., “Call Routing Mangement in Enterprise VoIP Networks,” Copyright 2007 ACM 978-1-59593-788-9/07/0008, 6 pages. |
| Stallings, William, “The Session Initiation Protocol,” The Internet Protocol Journal, vol. 6, No. 1, Mar. 2003, pp. 20-30. |
| Thernelius, Fredrik; “SIP, NAT, and Firewalls,” Master's Thesis; ERICSSON, Department of Teleinformatics, May 2000, pp. 1-69. |
| Townsley, et al.; “RFC 2661—Layer Two Tunneling Protocol ‘L2TP’”, Aug. 1999. |
| Trad et al., “Adaptive VoIP Transmission over Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks,” V. Roca and F. Rousseau (Eds.): MIPS 2004, LNCS 3311, pp. 25-36, 2004, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004. |
| Wikipedia, “International mobile subscriber identity (IMSI),” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMSI, Jul. 16, 2013. |
| Wikipedia , “Roaming,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//Roaming, Jul. 16, 2013. |
| Yu et al., “Service-Oriented Issues: Mobility, Security, Charging and Billing Management in Mobile Next Generation Networks,” IEEE BcN2006, 1-4244-0146-1/06, © 2006 IEEE, pp. 1-10. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority completed Jun. 6, 2008 for related PCT/CA2008/000545. |
| Intenational Seach Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority completed Feb. 6, 2008 for corresponding PCT/CA2007/001956. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed May 14, 2009 for corresponding PCT/CA2007/001956. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority completed Mar. 3, 2008 for related PCT/CA2007/002150. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 13, 2009 for related PCT/CA2007/002150. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Feb. 10, 2011 for related PCT Application No. PCT/CA2009/001062, Feb. 1, 2011. |
| Written Opinion and International Search Report completed on Jun. 18, 2010 for related PCT Application No. PCT/CA2009/001317. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 12, 2010 for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/CA2009/001062. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Sep. 29, 2009 for PCT/CA2008/000545. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Mar. 20, 2012 for PCT/CA2009/001317. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 2, 2012 for European Application No. EP 07 855 436.7. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 20, 2013 for European Application No. EP 09 849 358.8. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 16, 2014 for European Patent Application No. EP 09 802 316.1 which shares priority of U.S. Appl. No. 61/129,898, filed Jul. 28, 2008 with U.S. Appl. No. 13/056,277, filed Jan. 27, 2011, which is related to captioned U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,306, and cites above-identified reference Nos. 1 and 2. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 07 816 106, dated Jun. 18, 2012. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 07 816 106, dated Nov. 2, 2012. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2015 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,681,984. |
| Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2011 for Chinese Patent Application No. CN 200780049791.5. |
| Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2011 for Chinese Patent Application No. CN 200780049136.X. |
| Indonesian Examination Report dated Jul. 5, 2012 for Indonesian Patent Application No. W-00200901414. |
| Indonesian Examination Report dated Feb. 8, 2013 for Indonesian Patent Application No. W-00200901165. |
| Mexican Exam Report dated Jul. 11, 2011 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2009/004811. |
| Mexican Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 2, 2011 for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2009/005751. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2015 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,681,984. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2015 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,812,174. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2016 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,916,220. |
| First Examination Report dated Dec. 9, 2015, India Patent Application No. 1047/MUMNP/2009, corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/802,929, which is related to subject U.S. Appl. No. 14/802,872. |
| European Examination Report dated Nov. 26, 2015 for European Patent Application No. EP 07 816 106.4 which claims priority of U.S. Appl. No. 60/856,212, filed Nov. 2, 2006. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2016 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,670,510. |
| Document Title: Complaint for Patent Infringement [Jury Demand]; Case Title: VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation; Verizon Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation; AT&T, Inc., a Delaware corporation; AT&T Corp., a Delaware corporation; and Does I through X, inclusive, Defendants; Case No. 2:16-CV-00271; Court: United States District Court District of Nevada. Attachments: Table of Exhibits; Exhibit A; Exhibit B; Exhibit C; Exhibit D; Exhibit E; Chart 1 to Exhibit E; Chart 2 to Exhibit E; Chart 3 to Exhibit E; Chart 4 to Exhibit E; Chart 5 to Exhibit E; Chart 6 to Exhibit E; Exhibit F; Chart 1 to Exhibit F; Chart 2 to Exhibit F; Chart 3 to Exhibit F; Chart 4 to Exhibit F; Chart 5 to Exhibit F; Chart 6 to Exhibit F; Exhibit G; Exhibit H; and Addendum 1 to Exhibit H. |
| Document Title: Complaint for Patent Infringement [Jury Demand]; Case Title: VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. Apple, Inc., a California corporation; Defendants; Case No. 2:16-CV-00260; Court: United States District Court District of Nevada. Attachments: Table of Exhibits; Exhibit A; Exhibit B; Exhibit C; Exhibit D; Chart 1 to Exhibit D; Chart 2 to Exhibit D; Chart 3 to Exhibit D; Chart 4 to Exhibit D; Exhibit E; Exhibit F; and Addendum 1 to Exhibit F. |
| Letter dated Nov. 30, 2015, from VoIP-Pal.com Inc. giving notice and inviting the company listed herein below to contact VoIP-Pal.com about U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,179,005 and 8,542,815 and related patents listed in the accompanying Attachment A. Sent to the following company: Apple Inc. in the U.S. |
| Letter dated Dec. 1, 2015, from VoIP-Pal.com Inc. giving notice and inviting the company listed herein below to contact VoIP-Pal.com about U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,179,005 and 8,542,815 and related patents listed in the accompanying Attachment A. Sent to the following company: Verizon Communications in the U.S. |
| Letters dated Dec. 18, 2015, from VoIP-Pal.com Inc. giving notice and inviting the companies listed herein below to contact VoIP-Pal.com about U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 and related patents listed in the accompanying Attachment A. (Please Note: Attachment A is attached here only to the first letter.) Sent to the following companies: Airtel in India; Alcatel-Lucent in France; Avaya Inc. in the U.S.; AT&T in the U.S.; Blackberry in Canada; Cable One in the U.S.; CenturyLink in the U.S.; Charter Communications in the U.S.; Cisco Systems in the U.S.; Comcast in the U.S.; Cox Communications in the U.S.; Cricket Wireless in the U.S.; Facebook in the U.S.; Facebook in the U.S.; Freedom Pop in the U.S.; Frontier Communications in the U.S.; Google Inc. in the U.S.; HP in the U.S.; Juniper Networks in the U.S.; LoopPay, Inc. in the U.S.; Magic Jack in the U.S.; MetroPCS in the U.S.; Ooma in the U.S.; PayPal in the U.S.; Republic Wireless in the U.S.; Rok Mobile in the U.S.; Samsung Electronics-America in the U.S.; ShoreTel, Inc. in the U.S.; Siemens in Germany; Skype USA in the U.S.; Sprint in the U.S.; Square Cash in the U.S.; Suddenlink Communications in the U.S.; Talktone in the U.S.; Tango in the U.S.; Time Warner Cable in the U.S.; T-Mobile in the U.S.; Twitter in the U.S.; US Cellular in the U.S.; Venmo in the U.S.; Virgin Mobile USA in the U.S.; Vodafone in the UK; and Vonage in the U.S. |
| Letters dated Jan. 4, 2016, from VoIP-Pal.com Inc. giving notice and inviting the companies listed herein below to contact VoIP-Pal.com about U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 and related patents listed in the accompanying Attachment A. (Please Note: Attachment A is attachment here only the fist letter.) Sent to the following companies: Rogers Communications Inc. in Canada; Shaw Cable in Canada; Walmart in Alaska; and Wind Mobile in Canada. |
| Letters dated Jan. 21, 2016, from VoIP-Pal.com Inc. giving notice and inviting the companies listed herein below to contact VoIP-Pal.com about U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 and related patents listed in the accompanying Attachment A. (Please Note: Attachment A is attachment here only the fist letter.) Sent to the following companies: Alibaba (China) Co., Ltd in China; Comwave Telecommunications in Canada; and Intel in the U.S. |
| Letters dated Feb. 2, 2016, from VoIP-Pal.com Inc. giving notice and inviting the companies listed herein below to contact VoIP-Pal.com about U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 and related patents listed in the accompanying Attachment A. (Please Note: Attachment A is attachment here only the fist letter.) Sent to the following companies: Netflix Inc. in the U.S.; Skype Technologies in the U.S.; and WhatsApp Inc. in the U.S. |
| Document Title: United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. VoIP-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. TBD, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; dated Jun. 15, 2016. 70 sheets. |
| Document Title: In the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Petition for Inter Partes Review Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.100 ET SEQ.; In re U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Currently in Litigation Styled: VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-00260-RFB-VCF; Issued: Nov. 3, 2015; Application Filed: Aug. 13, 2013; Applicant: Clay Perreault, et al.; Title: Producing Routing Messages for Voice Over IP Communications; Declaration of Henry H. Houh, PhD; Signed Jun. 14, 2016. 143 sheets. |
| Document Title: United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. VoIP-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. TBD, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; dated Jun. 15, 2016. 67 sheets. |
| Document Title: In the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Petition for Inter Partes Review Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.100 ET SEQ.; In re U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Currently in Litigation Styled: VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-00260-RFB-VCF; Issued: Sep. 24, 2013; Application Filed: Nov. 1, 2007; Applicant: Clay Perreault, et al.; Title: Producing Routing Messages for Voice Over IP Communications; Declaration of Henry H. Houh, PhD; Signed Jun. 14, 2016. 143 sheets. |
| Document Title: Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Unified Patents Inc., Petitioner v. VoIP-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner; IPR2016-01082; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Producing Routing Messages for Voice Over IP Communications; dated May 24, 2016. 64 sheets. |
| Document Title: Declaration of Michael Caloyannides; United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Unified Patents Inc., Petitioner v. VoIP-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner; IPR2016-01082; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Producing Routing Messages for Voice Over IP Communications; Signed May 23, 2016; filed May 24, 2016. 84 sheets. |
| Document Title: Public Switched Telephone Networks: A Network Analysis of Emerging Networks; Daniel Livengood, Jijun Lin and Chintan Vaishnav; Engineering Systems Division; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Submitted May 16, 2006; to Dan Whitney, Joel Moses and Chris Magee. 27 sheets. |
| Document Title: A Brief History of VoIP; Document One—The Past; Joe Hallock; joe@sitedifference.com; date on cover page: Nov. 26, 2004; Evolution and Trends in Digital Media Technologies—COM 538; Masters of Communication in Digital Media; University of Washington. 17 sheets. |
| Document Title: Petitioner's Voluntary Interrogatory Responses; United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Unified Patents Inc., Petitioner v. VoIP-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner; IPR20161082; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Producing Routing Messages for Voice Over IP Communications; Signed and Filed not later than May 24, 2016. 8 sheets. |
| Document Title: VoIP-PAL, The World is Calling!, “Over $7 Billion in Lawsuits File by Voip-Pal.com Inc. vs Apple, Verizon and AT&T for Various Patent Infringements,” Business Wire®, A Berkshire Hathaway Company, Feb. 11, 2016. 2 sheets. |
| Technical Report, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Study into routeing of MT-SMs via the HPLMN (Release 7),” 3GPP TR 23.840 V0.1.0 (Feb. 2006), 13 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2016 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,916,217. |
| Communication for European Patent Application No. EP 07 816 106.4—Invitation pursuant to Article 94(3) and Rule 71(1) EPC dated Apr. 15, 2016. All pages. |
| Decision: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review, 37 C.F.R. § 42.108, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Unified Patents Inc., Petitioner v, VoIP-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Case IPR2016-01082, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2, Paper 8, Entered: Nov. 18, 2016. |
| Decision: Institution of Inter Partes Review, 37 C.F.R. § 42.108, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. VoIP-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Case IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2, Paper 6, Entered: Nov. 21, 2016. |
| Decision: Institution of Inter Partes Review, 37 C.F.R. § 42.108, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. VoIP-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Case IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2, Paper 6, Entered: Nov. 21, 2016. |
| Scheduling Order: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. VoIP-pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Cases IPR2016-01201, IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2, Paper 7, Entered: Nov. 21, 2016. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2016 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,681,984. |
| European Examination Report dated Aug. 29, 2016 for European Patent Application No. EP 07 855 436.7. |
| Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC—Intention to Grant—dated Oct. 14, 2016 for European Patent Application No. EP 07 816 106.4. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, Case No. IPR2016-01082, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, Unified Patents Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Filing Date: Aug. 26, 2016, 80 pages. |
| Voip-Pal.com, Inc. Exhibit 2001, Comparison of portions of Petition with portions of Declaration, IPR2016-01082, Unified Patents v. Voip-Pal, Filing Date: Aug. 26, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Filing Date: Sep. 19, 2016, 74 pages. |
| Voip-Pal.com, Inc. Exhibit 2001, Comparison of Petition (Ground 1) with Petition (Ground 2), IPR2016-01201, Apple v. Voip-Pal, Filing Date: Sep. 19, 2016, 19 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Filing Date: Sep. 21, 2016, 74 pages. |
| Voip-Pal.com, Inc. Exhibit 2001, Comparison of Petition (Ground 1) with Petition (Ground 2), IPR2016-01198, Apple v. Voip-Pal, Filing Date: Sep. 21, 2016, 21 pages. |
| Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court, District of Nevada, Case No. 2:16-cv-2338, Voip-Pal.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff v. Twitter, Inc., a California corporation, Defendant, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Civil Docket for Case #: 2:16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, United States District Court, District of Nevada (Las Vegas), Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc., Date Filed: Oct. 6, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Table of Exhibits, Case 2:16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, 1 page. |
| Exhibit A, Case 2:16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2, Issued Sep. 24, 2013, to Clay Perrault et al., 60 pages. |
| Exhibit B, Case 2:16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2, Issued Nov. 3, 2015, to Clay Perrault et al., 63 pages. |
| Exhibit C, Case 2.16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, Letter dated Dec. 18, 2015 giving notice of U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2; and related Patents listed in Attachment A, 4 pages. |
| Exhibit D, Case 2:16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, Asserted Claims and Infringement Conditions, United States District Court, District of Nevada, Voip-Pal.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff v. Twitter, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants, 6 pages. |
| Chart 1 to Exhibit D, Case 2.16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, Chart 1, Asserted Claims and Infringement Conditions Concerning U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States District Court, District of Nevada, Voip-Pal.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff v. Twitter, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants, 20 pages. |
| Chart 2 to Exhibit D, Case 2:16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, Chart 2, Asserted Claims and Infringement Conditions Concerning U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States District Court, District of Nevada, Voip-Pal.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff v. Twitter, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants, 28 pages. |
| Exhibit E, Case 2:16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, VPLM Active U.S. Patent Matters as of Oct. 1, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Exhibit F, Case 2:16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH, Filed Oct. 6, 2016, Twitter Royalty Monetization Analysis Overview, 4 pages. |
| Patent Owner Response to Petition, Apples Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com. Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 5,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Filed: Feb. 10, 2017, 76 pages. |
| Patent Owner Updated Exhibity List, Apples Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com. Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Filed: Feb. 10, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2002, IPR2016-01201, “Declaration of Ryan Thomas in Support of Pro HAC Vice Motion, ” Apples Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com. Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 20, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2003, IPR2016-01201, “Technical Review of Digifornica VoIP System” DIGIFONICA, Global Telephone Solutions, Author: John Rutter, Stuart Gare, Version V0.7 (Draft), Date: May 7, 2005, 35 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2004, IPR2016-01201, Memo—“Subject: Smart 421 Contract signed and Faxed,” From: Clay S. Perreault, Date: Jun. 6. 2005, 8:53 AM, To: Steve Nicholson, et al., 2 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2005, IPR2016-01201, Memo—“Subject: Digifonica TEchnology review,” From: Clay Perreault, Date: Jun. 6, 2005, 5:37 PM; To: John Rutter, et al., 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2006, IPR2016-01201, Memo—“Subject: Re: Sample code for review Next document upload complete,” From: Clay Perreault, Date: Jun. 15, 2005, 3:28 PM, To: John Rutter, et al., 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2007, IPR2016-01201, DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“[Fwd: Digifonica Technical Review—draft report],” From Clay Perreault, To: Rod Thomson, et al., Tue, Jul. 5, 2005 at 4:45 PM, 2 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2008, IPR2016-01201, John Rutter—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.Com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 31, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2009, IPR2016-01201, Stuart Gare—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 2, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2010, IPR2016-01201, Pentti Kalevi Huttunen—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 3, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2011, IPR2016-01201, Ryan Purita—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 31, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2012, IPR2016-01201, Johan Emil Viktor Björsell—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 9, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2013, IPR2016-01201, Clay Perreault—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 8, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2014, IPR2016-01201, RBR Source Code, Version 361, “call_e164.class.php RBR Version 361, Jun. 6, 2005 09:22:59,” 45 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2015, IPR2016-01201, RBR Source Code Log for Trunk Directory, “r1879 | cdelalande | Oct. 31, 2006 17:07:46-0800 (Tue, Oct. 31, 2006) | 3 lines,” 56 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2016, IPR2016-01201, William Henry Mangione-Smith—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 10, 2017, 82 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2017, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“notes from your presentation, 1 message” From Konstantin Kropivny, To: Emil Björsell, Tue, Jun. 14, 2005 at 7:33PM, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2018, IPR2016-01201, David Terry—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 8, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2019, IPR2016-01201, DR DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software release 10:30 am PST—11:00am PST for Aug. 25, 2005. 1 message” From Samantha Edwards, To: everyone@digifonica.com, Wed., Aug. 24, 2005 at 4:02 PM, 8 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2020, IPR2016-01201, “Next Generation Networks—A Migration Path Digifonica Voice Over IP Technologies. Technology Overview DRAFT Jun. 3, 2005, Not for Distribution,” by Clay S Perreault, CEO/CTO, Digifonica International Ltd, Gibraltar, 45 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2021, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supermodes. Salm Rev 341, RBR Rev 341 added, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Björsell, Tue, May 31, 2005 at 1:13 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2022, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Salm Rev 341, RBR Rev 341, 2 message” Emil Björsell To: Fuad, et al., Tue, May 31, 2005 at 2:38 and 2:44 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2023, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out of supernodes. RBR Roll out Rev 353 added, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Björsell, Thu, Jun. 2, 2005 at 1:12 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2024, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supernodes. RBR Roll out Rev 358 added, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Björsell, Sun, Jun. 5, 2005 at 1:18 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2025, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supernodes. RBR Roll out Rev 361 updated, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Björsell, Mon., Jun. 6, 2005 at 9:26 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2026, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll out Rev 361, 1 message” David Terry To: Fuad, et al., Mon., Jun. 6, 2005 at 9:33 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2027, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll out Rev 361, 1 message” Emil Björsell To: Fuad, et al., Mon., Jun. 6, 2005 at 11:33 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2030, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supermodes. RBR Rev 541 updated, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Björsell, Thu, Aug. 4, 2005 at 11:57 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2031, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Rev 541, 1 message” David Terry To: Fuad, et al., Thu, Aug. 4, 2005 at 1:58 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2032, IPR2016-01201, DF DifiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Rev 541, 1 message” Emil Björsell To: Fuad, et al., Thu, Aug. 4, 2005 at 3:59 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2033, IPR2016-01201, DR DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supermodes. RBR Roll out Rev 554 added, 1 message” Fuad A. To: Emil Björsell, Mon, Aug. 8, 2005 at 10:55 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2034, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll out Rev 554, 2 messages” David Terry To: Fuad, et al., Mon, Aug. 8, 2005 at 11:48 AM and 12:00 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2035, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll out Rev 554, 1 message” Emil Björsell To: Fuad, et al., Mon, Aug. 8, 2005 at 12:09 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2036, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica Internatioanl Inc Memo—“Digifonica: RBR and Salma Deployment,” Samanta Edwards To: everyone@digifonica.com, Mon, Aug. 8, 2005 at 4:12 PM, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2042, IPR2016-01201, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll out Rev 693==>694, 1 message” Chris Huff To: Fuad, et al., Tue, Aug. 23, 2005 at 1:33 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2043, IPR2016-01201, “Deposition of Henry H. Houh, Ph.D., vol. I, Taken on Behalf of the Patent Owner,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 25, 2017, 128 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2044, IPR2016-01201, “Deposition of Henry H. Houh, Ph.D., vol. II, Taken on Behalf of the Patent Owner,”Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 26, 2017, 158 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2045, IPR2016-01201, Curriculum Vitae of William Henry Mangione-Smith, Ph.D., 23 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2046, IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 3,725,596, dated Apr. 3, 1973, Rodney Robert Maxon et al., 18 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2047, IPR2016-01201, “Merlin® Communications System, Centrex/PBS Connection,”Lucent Technologies, Bell Labs Innovations, © 1984 AT&T, 999-500-138 IS, Issue 1, Mar. 1985, 26 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2048, IPR2016-01201, “Telephone Features,” Quick Reference Guide, Definity, Rockefeller Group, Telecommunications Services, Inc., 2000, 2 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2049, IPR2016-01201, Valdar, Andy, Understanding Telecommunications Networks, ©2006 The Institution of Engineering and Technology, London, UK, Title page, copyright page, pp. 38-39. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2050, IPR2016-01201, Horak, Ray, “Webster's New World® Telecom Dictionary,” © 2008 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, Title page, copyright page, p. 133. |
| Patent Owner Response to Petition, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Filed: Feb. 10, 2017, 78 pages. |
| Patent Owner Updated Exhibit List, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Filed: Feb. 10, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2002, IPR2016-011988, “Declaration of Ryan Thomas in Support of Pro HAC Vice Motion,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 20, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2003, IPR20116-01198, “Technical Review of Digifonica VoIP System,” DIGIFONICA, Global Telelphone Solutions, Author: John Rutter, Stuart Gare, Version V0.7 (Draft), Date: May 7, 2005, 35 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2004, IPR2016-01198, Memo—“Subject: Smart 421 Contract signed and Faxed,” From: Clay S. Perreault, Date: Jun. 6, 2005, 8:53 AM, To: Steve Nicholson, et al., 2 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2005, IPR2016-01198, Memo—“Subject Digifonica TEchnology review,” From: Clay Perreault, Date: Jun. 6, 2005, 5:37 PM; To: John Retter, et al., 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2006, IPR2016-01198, Memo—“Subject: Re: Sample Code for review Next document upload complete,” From: Clay Perreault, Date: Jun. 15, 2005, 3:28 PM, To: John Rutter, et al., 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2007, IPR2016-01198, DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“[Fwd: Digifonica Technical Review—draft report],” From Clay Perreault, To: Rod Thomson, et al., Tue, Jul. 5, 2005 at 4:45 PM, 2 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2008, IPR2016-01198, John Rutter—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 31, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2009, IPR2016-01198, Stuart Gare—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.Com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 2, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2010, IPR2016-01198, Pentti Kalevi Huttunen—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 3, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2011, IPR2016-01198, Ryan Purita—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 31, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2012, IPR2016-01198, Johan Emil Viktor Björsell—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition, ” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 9, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2013, IPR2016-01198, Clay Perreault—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 8, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2014, IPR2016-01198, RBR Source Code, Version 361, “call_e164.class.php RBR Version 361, Jun. 6, 2005 09:22:59,” 45 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2015, IPR2016-01198, RBR Source Code Log for Trunk Directory, “r1879 | cdelalande | Oct. 31, 2006 17:07:46-0800 (Tue, Oct. 31, 2006) | 3 lines,” 56 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2016, IPR2016-01198, William Henry Mangione-Smith—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 10, 2017, 96 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2017, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“notes from your presentation, 1 message” From Konstantin Kropivny, To: Emil Björsell, Tue, Jun. 14, 2005 at 7:33PM, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2018, IPR2016-01198, Dave Terry—“Declaration in Support Patent Owner Response to Inter Partes Petition, ” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Feb. 8, 2017. 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2019, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software release 10:30 am PST—11:00am PST for Aug. 25, 2005. 1 message” From Samantha Edwards, To: everyone@digifonica.com, Wed., Aug. 24, 2005 at 4:02 PM, 8 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2020, IPR2016-01198, “Next Generation Networks—A Migration Path Digifonica Voice Over IP Technologies. Technology Overview, DRAFT Jun. 3, 2005, Not for Distribution,” by Clay S Perreault, CEO/CTO, Digifonica International Ltd, Gibraltar, 45 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2021, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supernods. Salm Rev 341, RBR 341 added, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Björsell, Tue, May 31, 2005 at 1:13 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2022, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Salm Rev 341, RBR Rev 341, 2 message” Emil Björsell To: Fuad, et al., Tue, May 31, 2005 at 2:38 and 2:44 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2023, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supernodes. RBR Roll out Rev 353 added, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Bjösell, Thu, Jun. 2, 2005 at 1:12 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2024, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supernodes. RBR Roll out Rev 358 added, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Björsell, Sun, Jun. 5, 2005 at 1:18 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2025, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supernods. RBR Roll out Rev 361 updated, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Björsell, Mon., Jun. 6, 2005 at 9:25 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2026, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll Out Rev 361, 1 message” David Terry To: Fuad, et al., Mon., Jun. 6, 2005 at 9:33 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2027, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll Out Rev 361, 1 message” Emil Björsell To: Fuad, et al., Mon., Jun. 6, 2005 at 11:33 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2030, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supernodes. RBR Rev 541 updated, 1 message” Fuad A. To: E. Björsell, Thu, Aug. 4, 2005 at 11:57 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2031, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Rev 541, 1 message” David Terry To: Fuad, et al., Thu, Aug. 4, 2005 at 1:58 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2032, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Rev 541, 1 message” Emil Björsell To: Fuad, et al., Thu, Aug. 4, 2005 at 3:59 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2033, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Software roll out for supernodes. RBR Roll out Rev 554 added, 1 message” Fuad A. To: Emil Björsell, Mon, Aug. 8, 2005 at 10:55 AM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2034, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll out Rev 554, 2 messages” David Terry To: Fuad, et al., Mon, Aug. 8, 2005 at 11:48 AM and 12:00 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2035, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll out Rev 554, 1 message” Emil Björsell To: Fuad, et al., Mon, Aug. 8, 2005 at 12:09 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2036, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“Digifonica: RBR and Salma Deployment,” Samantha Edwards To: everyone@digifonica.com, Mon, Aug. 8, 2005 at 4:12 PM, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2042, IPR2016-01198, DF DigiFonica International Inc Memo—“RBR Roll out Rev 693==>694, 1 message” Chris Huff To: Fuad, et al., Tue, Aug. 23, 2005 at 1:33 PM, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2043, IPR2016-01198, “Deposition of Henry H. Houh, Ph.D., vol. I, Taken on Behalf of the Patent Owner,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201 U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 25, 2017, 128 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2044, IPR2016-01198, “Deposition of Henry H. Houh, Ph.D., vol. II, Taken on Behalf of the Patent Owner,” Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201 U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Dated: Jan. 26, 2017, 158 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2045, IPR2016-01198, Curriculum Vitae of William Henry Mangione-Smith, Ph.D., 23 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex., 2046, IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 3,725,596, Issued Apr. 3, 1973, Rodney Robert Maxon et al., 18 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2047, IPR2016-01198, “Merlin® Communications System, Centrex/PBS Connection,” Lucent Technologies, Bell Labs Innovations,© 1984 AT&T, 999-500-138 IS, Issue 1, Mar. 1985, 26 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2048, IPR2016-01198, “Telephone Features,” Quick Reference Guide, Definty, Rockefeller Group, Telecommunications Services, Inc., 2000, 2 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2049, IPR2016-01198, Valdar, Andy, Understanding Telecommunications Networks, © 2006 The Institution of Engineering and Technology, London, UK, Title plage, copyright page, pp. 38-39. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2050, IPR2016-01198, Horak, Ray, “Webster's New World® Telecom Dictionary,”© 2008 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, Title page, copyright page, p. 133. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2017 for Canadian Patent Application No. CN 2,916,220. |
| Document Title: United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-pal.com Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2017-01399-815; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Dated May 9, 2017, 63 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01399-815; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815: U.S. Pat. No. 7,486,684 to Chu, et al., 59 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1004, Case No. IPR2017-01399-815; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815: U.S. Pat. No. 6,760,324 to Scott, et al., 65 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1005, Case No. IPR2017-01399-815; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815: Declaration of Henry H. Hough, PhD, 45 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1006, Case No. IPR2017-01399-815; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815: U.S. Publication No. 2002/0122547 to Hinchey et al., 21 pages. |
| Document Title: United States Patent and Trademark Office: Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Patent of Voip-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2017-01398-005; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 9,179,005; Dated May 9, 2017, 54 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1006, Case No. IPR2017-01398-005; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; U.S. Pat. No. 7,486,684 to Chu, et al., 59 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1007, Case No. IPR2017-01398-005; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005: U.S. Pat. No. 6,760,324 to Scott, et al., 65 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1008, Case No. IPR2017-01398-005; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005: Declaration of Henry H. Hough, PhD, 41 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1009, Case No. IPR2017-01398-005; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005: U.S. Publication No. 200/0122547 to Hinchey et al., 21 pages. |
| Document Title: In the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner v. Digifonica (International) Limited Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2017-01382; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Dated May 8, 2017, 84 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner v. Digifonica (International) Limited Patent Owner, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-01382; Declaration of James Bress in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; with Appendices A through II, 2113 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1004, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix A, James R. Bress, Curriculum Vitae, 26 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix B, Chapter 5, Telecommunications Essentials, Lillian Goleniewski, © 2002, 40 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix C, Chapter 11, Telecommunications Essentials, Lillian Goleniewski, © 2002, 41 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix D, ITU-T Recommendation E.164 (May 1997), 27 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix E, Telcordia Notes on the Networks, SR-2275, Issue 4, Oct. 2000, pp. 3-8-3-14, 9 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix F, Chapter 4, Telecommunications, Essentials, Lillian Goleniewski, © 2002, pp. 99-100, 4 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix G, Telcordia Notes on the Networks, SR-2275, Issue 4, Oct. 2000, pp. 18-1-18-20, 22 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix H, Softswitch, Architecture for VoIP, Franklin D. Ohrtman, Jr., © 2003, Chapter 2, 32 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix I, Telecommunications Act of 1996, 104th Congress of the U.S.A., Jan. 1996, 128 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix J, Perspective on the AIN Architecture, Berman et al., IEEE Communications Magazine, Feb. 1992, 6 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix K, U.S. Pat. No. 7,907,714 B2, to Baniak et al., 21 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix L, The IMS, Polkselkä & Mayer, © 2009, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chapter 1 Introduction, 14 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix M, The IMS, Polkselkä & Mayer, © 2009, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 24-25 and 86-94, 13 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix N, Chapter 9, Telecommunications Esentials, Lillian Goleniewski, © 2002, 42 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix O, Softswitch, Architecture for VoIP, Franklin D. Ohrtman, Jr., © 2003, pp. 238-239, 4 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix P, Softswitch, Architecture for VoIP, Franklin D. Ohrtman, Jr. © 2003, Chapter 4, pp. 67-86, 22 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix Q, Softswitch, Architecture for VoIP, Franklin D. Ohrtman, Jr. © 2003, Chapter 5, pp. 87-112, 28 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix R, Telecommunication Essentials, Lillian Goleniewski, © 2002, pp. 221, 3 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix S, Network Working Group, RFC (Request for Comments): 1122, Internat Engineering Task Force, R. Braden, Ed., Oct. 1989, pp. 18-25, 9 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix T, RFC (Request for Comments): 791, Internet Protocol, DARPA Internet Program, Protocol Specification, Sep. 1981, by Information Sciences Institute, USC, 50 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix U, Network Working Group, RFC (Request for Comments): 1034, P. Mockapetris, ISI, Nov. 1987, pp. 1-55, 55 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix V, Network Working Group, RFC (Request for Comments): 1035, P. Mockapetris, ISI, Nov. 1987, pp. 1-55, 55 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix W, Network Working Group, RFC (Request for Comments): 3761, P. Faltstrom et al., Apr. 2004, pp. 1-18, 18 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix X, U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,254 B1, to Kelly, 18 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix Y, ITU-T Recommendation H.323 (Jul. 2003), 298 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix Z, Telcordia Notes on the Networks, SR-2275, Issue 4, Oct. 2000, pp. 6-306-6-309, 4 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix AA, Telcordia Notes on the Networks, SR-2275, Issue 4, Oct. 2000, pp. 14-10-14-13, 6 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix BB, The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF®), May 5, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix CC, Network Working Group, RFC (Request for Comments); 3261, J. Rosenberg et al., Jun. 2002, 269 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix DD, Network Working Group, RFC (Request for Comments): 3666, A. Johnston et al., Dec. 2003, 118 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix EE, Network Working Group, RFC (Request for Comments): 3665, A. Johnston et al., Dec. 2003, 94 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix FF, Network Working Group, RFC (Request for Comments): 2327, M. Handley et al., Apr. 1998, 42 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix GG, ITU-T Recommendation Q.931 (May 1998), 345 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix HH, Telcordia Notes on the Networks, SR-2275, Issue 4, Oct. 2000, pp. 14-76-14-77, 4 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Appendix II, Telcordia Notes on the Networks, SR-2275, Issue 4, Oct. 2000, pp. 10-17, 3 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1004, Case No. IPR2017-01382; James R. Bress, Curriculum Vitae, 26 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1005, Case No. IPR2017-01382; U.S. Pat. No. 6,240,449, Issued May 29, 2001 to Raymond Nadeau, 13 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1006, Case No. IPR2017-01382; U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,254 B1, Issued Jul. 15, 2003 to Keith C. Kelly, 18 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1007, Case No. IPR2017-01382; U.S. Pat. No. 7,715,413 B2, Issued May 11, 2010, to Vaziri et al., 53 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1008, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Decision, Institution of Inter Partes Review, 37 C.F.R. § 42.108, Paper 6, Entered Nov. 21, 2016, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Case IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2, Before Barbara A. Benoit, Lynne E. Pettigrew, and Stacy B. Margolies, Administrative Patent Judges, 33 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1009, Case No. IPR2017-01382; p. 221 and Chapter 11, Telecommunications Essentials, Lillian Goleniewski, © 2002, 44 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1010, Case No. IPR2017-01382; RFC (Request for Comments): 791, Internet Protocol, DARPA Internet Program, Protocol Specification, Sep. 1981, by Information Sciences Institute, USC, 50 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1011, Case No. IPR2017-01382; ITU-T Recommendation H.323 (Jul. 2003), 298 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1012, Case No. IPR2017-01382; Telcordia Notes on the Networks, SR-2275, Issue 4, Oct. 2000, pp. 10-17, 3 pages. |
| Document Title: In the Unted States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner v. Digifonica (International) Limited Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2017-01383; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Dated May 8, 2017, 92 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Unted States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner v. Digifonica (International) Limited Patent Owner, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-01383; Declaration of James Bress in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; with Appendices A through II, 2094 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1004, Case No. IPR2017-01383; James R. Bress, Curriculum Vitae, 26 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1005, Case No. IPR2017-01383; U.S. Pat. No. 6,240,449, Issued May 29, 2001 to Raymond Nadeau, 13 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1006, Case No. IPR2017-01383; U.S. Publication No. 2004/0218748 A1, Published Nov. 4, 2004, by Stephen Fisher, 18 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1007, Case No. IPR2017-01383; U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,254 B1, Issued Jul. 15, 2003, to Keith C. Kelly, 18 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1008, Case No. IPR2017-01383; U.S. Pat. No. 6,674,850 B2, Issued Jan. 6, 2004 to Vu et al., 10 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1009, Case No. IPR2017-01383; Decision, Institution of Inter Partes Review, 37 C.F.R. § 42.108, Paper 6, Entered Nov. 21, 2016, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Case IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2, Before Barbara A. Benoit, Lynne E. Pettigrew, and Stacy B. Margolies, Administrative Patent Judges, 32 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1010, Case No. IPR2017-01383; Patent Owner Response to Petition, Filed Feb. 10, 2017, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2, 78 pages. |
| Document Title: In the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner v. Digifonica (International) Limited Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2017-01384; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Dated May 7, 2017, 70 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1003, Unted States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner v. Digifonica (International) Limited Patent Owner, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-01384; Declaration of James Bress in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; with Appendices A through II, 2085 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1004, Case No. IPR2017-01384; James R. Bress, Curriculum Vitae, 26 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1005, Case No. IPR2017-01384; U.S. Pat. No. 6,240,449, Issued May 29, 2001 to Raymond Nadeau, 13 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1006, Case No. IPR2017-01384; U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,254 B1, Issued Jul. 15, 2003, to Keith C. Kelly, 18 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1007, Case No. IPR2017-01384; U.S. Pat. No. 7,715,413 B2, Issued May 11, 2010 to Vaziri et al., 53 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1008, Case No. IPR2017-01384; Decision, Institution of Inter Partes Review, 37 C.F.R. § 42.108, Paper 6, Entered Nov. 21, 2016, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner, Case IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2, Before Barbara A. Benoit, Lynne E. Pettigrew, and Stacy B. Margolies, Administrative Patent Judges, 32 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1009, Case No. IPR2017-01384; p. 221 and Chapter 11, Telecommunications Essentials, Lillian Golenlewski, © 2002, 44 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1010, Case No. IPR2017-01384; RFC (Request for Comments): 791, Internet Protocol, DARPA Internet Program, Protocol Specification, Sep. 1981, by Information Sciences Institute, USC, 50 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1011, Case No. IPR2017-01384; ITU-T Recommendation H.323 (Jul. 2003), 298 pages. |
| Petitioner AT&T Services, Inc. Exhibit 1012, Case No. IPR2017-01384; Telcordia Notes on the Networks, SR-2276, Issue 4, Oct. 2000, p. 10-17, 3 pages. |
| Document Title: United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response, Dated May 17, 2017, 34 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1007, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Discovery Deposition of William Henry Mangione-Smith, taken on Apr. 19, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 213 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1008, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Discovery Deposition of John Rutter, taken (by phone) on Apr. 5, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 43 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1009, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Discovery Deposition of David Terry, taken on Mar. 24, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 95 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1010, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Discovery Deposition of Clay Perreault, taken on Apr. 12, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 118 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1011, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Complaint for Patent Infringement [Jury Demand], United States District Court, District of Nevada, Case No. 2:16-CV-00260, Voip-pal.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. Apple, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants, filed Feb. 9, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Discovery Deposition of Johan Emil Viktor Bjorsell, taken on Mar. 24, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-001198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 204 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1013, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Letter dated Apr. 21, 2017 to Adam P. Seitz et al., Erise IP, P.A., re: IPR2016-01198 & IPR1026-01201, “Pursuant to the Board Order of Apr. 19, 2017 (Paper 28) . . . ” from Kerry Taylor, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, 1 page. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1014, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Email dated May 1, 2017 to Adam P. Seitz et al., Erise IP, P.A., re: IPR2016-01198 & IPR1026-01201—Fuad Arafa, from Kerry Taylor, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, 2 pages. |
| Document Title: United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response, Paper 34, Dated May 17, 2017, 33 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1010, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Discovery Deposition of William Henry Mangione-Smith, taken on Apr. 19, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 213 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1011, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Discovery Deposition of John Rutter, taken (by phone) on Apr. 5, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 43 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1012, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Discovery Deposition of David Terry, taken on Mar. 24, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 95 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1013, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Discovery Deposition of Clay Perreault, taken on Apr. 12, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 118 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1014, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Complaint for Patent Infringement [Jury Demand], United States District Court, District of Nevada, Case No. 2:16-CV-00260, Voip-Pal.com, Inc. a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. Apple, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants, filed Feb. 9, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1015, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Discovery Deposition of Johan Emil Viktor Bjorsell, taken on Mar. 24, 2017 in Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, 204 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1016, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Letter dated Apr. 21, 2017 to Adam P. Seitz et al., Erise IP, P.A., re: IPR2016-01198 & IPR1026-01201, “Pursuant to the Board Order of Apr. 19, 2017 (Paper 28) . . . ” from Kerry Taylor, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, 1 page. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Exhibit 1017, United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Email dated May 1, 2017 to Adam P. Seitz et al, Erise IP, P.A., re:IPR2016-01198 & IPR1026-01201—Fuad Arafa, from Kerry Taylor, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, 2 pages. |
| Document Title: United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Patent Owner Objections to Apple Evidence Served with Petitioner's Reply, Filed on behalf of Patent Owner Voip-Pal.com, Inc. Filed: May 24, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Document Title: United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com.Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Patent Owner Objections to Apple Evidence Served with Petitioner's Reply, Filed on behalf of Patent Owner Voip-Pal.com Inc., Filed: May 24, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action dated May 29, 2017 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,668,025. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2017 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,916,217. |
| European Examination Report dated May 12, 2017 for European Patent Application No. EP 09-802-316.1. |
| Petitioner's Reqeust for Oral Argument, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Patent Owner Sur-Reply in Response to Petitioner's Reply, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Patent Owner Request for Oral Argument, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Patent Owner Motion to Exclude, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 18 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2052, IPR2016-01201, Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Reporter's Transcript of Telephoric Hearing, Jun. 7, 2017, 16 pages. |
| Petitioner's Request for Oral Argument, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Patent Owner Sur-Reply in Response to Petitoner's Reply, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Patent Owner Request for Oral Argument, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Patent Owner Motion to Exclude, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 18 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2052, IPR2016-01198, Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Reporter's Transcript of Telephonic Hearing, Jun. 7, 2017, 16 pages. |
| Order, Conduct of Proceeding, 37 C.F.R. § 42.5, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trail and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner. Cases IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2, Paper No. 37, Filed: Jun. 13, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2053, IPR2016-01198, Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Reporter's Transcript of Telephonic Hearing, Jun. 20, 2017, 25 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2053, IPR2016-01201, Apple Inc. vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Reporter's Transcript of Telephonic Hearing, Jun. 20, 2017, 25 pages. |
| Order, Conduct of Proceeding, 37 C.F.R. §42.5 United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trail and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner. Cases IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2, Paper No. 43, Filed: Jun. 22, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Order, Trial Hearing, 37 C.F.R. §42.5 United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trail and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner. Cases IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2, Paper No. 45, Filed: Jun. 22, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Motion to Exclude, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, Date: Jun. 26, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Motion to Exclude, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, Date: Jun. 26, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Patent Owner Reply to Opposition to Motion to Exclude, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR 2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, Filed: Jul. 3, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Patent Owner Reply to Opposition to Motion to Exclude, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR 2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, filed Jul. 3, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Ex. 2054, IPR2016-01198, Voip-PAL's Demonstratives For Oral Hearing, Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Case IPR2016-01201 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815), Case IPR2016-01198 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005), Jul. 20, 2017, 34 pages. |
| Petitioner Apple Inc. Ex. 1018, Petitioner's Demonstrative Exhibits, Inter Partes Reviews, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 & U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, Oral Argument, Jul. 20, 2017, Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Case IPR2016-01198; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, Case IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, 46 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2017 for Candian Patent Application No. CA 2,681,984. |
| Indian Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2017 for lndian Patent Application No. IN 1227/MUMNP/2009. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner, v. VoIP-PAL.COM, INC., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2017-01382, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, dated Aug. 24. 2017, 71 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review, United States Patent And Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board,AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner, v. VoIP-PAL.COM, INC., Patent Owner. Case No. IPR2017-01383. U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, dated Aug. 24, 2017, 74 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner, v. VoIP-PAL.COM, INC., Patent Owner. Case No. IPR2017-01384. U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, dated Aug. 24, 2017, 61 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2017-01398, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005, dated Aug. 25, 2017, 76 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. VoIP-PAL.COM, INC., Patent Owner, Case No. IPR2017-01399, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815, dated Aug. 25, 2017, 77 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com., Inc. Patent Owner; Cases IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2; Record of Oral Hearing, Held: Jul. 20, 2017; Before Josiah C. Cocks, Jennifer Meyer Chagnon, and John A. Hudalla, Administrative Patent Judges, 83 pages. |
| Intimation of the grant and recordal of India Patent No. 287412 entitled “Producing Routing Messages for Voice Over IP Communications”, dated Sep. 15, 2017, for India Patent Application No. IN 1047/MUMNP/2009 filed Nov. 1, 2007. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2014 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,670,510. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2015 for Canadian Patent Application No. CA 2,732,148. |
| United States Patent And Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2; Final Written Decision; Paper 53, Entered: Nov. 20, 2017; 29 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2; Final Written Decision; Paper 54, Entered: Nov. 20, 2017; 29 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case IPR2017-01399, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2; Decision: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review; Paper No. 6, Entered: Nov. 20, 2017; 23 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case IPR2017-01398, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2; Decision: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review; Paper No. 6, Entered: Nov. 20, 2017; 23 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.Com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case IPR2017-01382, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2; Decision: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review; Paper No. 8, Entered: Nov. 20, 2017; 28 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case IPR2017-01383, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2; Decision: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review; Paper No. 8, Entered: Nov. 20, 2017; 43 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; AT&T Services, Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case IPR2017-01384, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2; Decision: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review; Paper No. 8, Entered: Nov. 20, 2017; 31 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Volp-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Cases IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2; Order, Conduct of Proceeding, 37 C.F.R. ξ 42.5; Paper No. 54, Entered: Dec. 20, 2017; 4 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Petitioner's Motion for Entry of Judgment in Favor of Petitioner etc; Paper 55, Date: Dec. 20, 2017; 18 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List; Date: Dec. 22, 2017; 4 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Exhibit 1019—Sep. 18, 2017 Voip-Pal Website advertising Dr. Sawyer's Letters; Date: Dec. 20, 2017; 1 page. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IP2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Exhibit 1020—Sep. 2017 Voip-Pal Website posting and linking all of Dr. Sawyer's Letters; Date: Dec. 20, 2017; 2 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 82 and Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2; IPR2016-01201 Exhibit 1021—Telephonic Hearing Before the Administrative Patent Judges: Dec. 19, 2017; 25 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Appl. No. 9,179,005; Petitioner's Motion for Entry of Judgment in Favor of Petitioner etc; Date: Dec. 20, 2017; 18 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List; Date: Dec. 22, 2017; 4 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2; Exhibit 1019—Sep. 18, 2017 Voip-Pal Website advertising Dr. Sawyer's Letters; Date: Dec. 20, 2017; 1 page. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2; Exhibit 1020—Sep. 2017 Voip-Pal Website posting and linking all of Dr. Sawyer's Letters; Date: Dec. 20, 2017; 2 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, vs. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2 and Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2; IPR2016-01198 Exhibit 1021—Telephonic Hearing Before the Administrative Patent Judges: Dec. 19, 2017; 25 pages. |
| Exhibit 3001 filed Dec. 20, 2017—Letter from Ryan L. Thomas dated Dec. 19, 2017 re Representation of VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. in Conference Call to the Administrative Patent Judges in re IPR2016-01198 and IPR-2016-01201; 1 page. |
| Exhibit 3002 fied Dec. 20, 2017—Email from Attorney Adam Seitz dated Dec. 15, 2017 to the Administrative Patent Judges in re IPR2016-01198 and IPR-2016-01201 re Authorization to File Motion for Sanctions; 1 page. |
| Exhibit 3003 filed Dec. 20, 2017—Letter from Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer (Shareholder) dated May 1, 2017 To Ptab Chief Judge David P. Ruschke in re IPR2016-01198 and IPR-2016-01201 re Review of Proceedings, 6 pages. |
| Exhibit 3004 filed Dec. 20, 2017—Letter from Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer (Shareholder) dated Jun. 21, 2017 to PTAB Chief Judge David P. Ruschke in re IPR2016-01198 and IPR-2016-01201 re Review of Proceedings, 3 pages. |
| Exhibit 3005 filed Dec. 20, 2017—Letter from Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer (Shareholder) dated Jul. 11, 2017 to PTAB Chief Judge David P. Ruschke in re IPR2016-01198 and IPR-2016-01201 re Review of Proceedings, 5 pages. |
| Exhibit 3006 filed Dec. 20, 2017—Letter from Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer (Shareholder) dated Jul. 27, 2017 to the Secretary of the Department of Commerce Hon. Wilbur Ross et al. in re IPR2016-01198 and IPR-2016-01201 re Review of Proceedings, 6 pages. |
| Exhibit 3007 filed Dec. 20, 2017—Letter from Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer (Shareholder) dated Aug. 31 , 2017 to the Secretary of the Department of Commerce Hon. Wilbur Ross in re IPR2016-01198 and IPR-2016-01201 re Review of Proceedings, 8 pages. |
| Exhibit 3008 filed Dec. 20, 2017—Letter from Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer (Shareholder) dated Oct. 23, 2017 to the PTAB Chief Judge David P. Ruschke et al. in re IPR2016-01198 and IPR-2016-01201 re Review of Proceedings, 10 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Patent Owner's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Board Order of Dec. 20, 2017; Filed: Jan. 12, 2018; 17 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Patent Owner's Updated Exhibit List; Filed: Jan. 12, 2018; 9 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2056, IPR2016-01198; United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Declaration in Support of Patent Owner's Opposition to Motion fr Sanctions; Dated: Jan. 12, 2018; 12 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Patent Owner's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Board Order of Dec. 20, 2017; Filed: Jan. 12, 2018; 17 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Patent Owner's Updated Exhibit List; Filed: Jan. 12, 2018; 9 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2056, IPR2016-01198; United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Declaration in Support of Patent Owner's Opposition to Motion for Sanctions; Dated: Jan. 12, 2018; 12 pages. |
| Voip-Pal EXHIBIT 2057; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Declaration of Adam R. Knecht, Esq. Regarding Notice of Various Letters from Dr. Thomas Sawyer to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware II (ECF Nos. 28 and 32); including Exhibit A (7 pages), Exhibit B (19 pages) and Exhibit C (12 pages); Executed on Dec. 18, 2017; 40 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2058; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; O'Brien et al., “Revealed: Federal Judges Guilty of Owning Stock in Corporations They Ruled On,” Occupy.com (May 1, 2014) 11 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2059; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Letter dated Aug. 7, 2013 from Kathryn Siehndel, USPTO FOIA Officer, Re: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request No. F-13-00218 concerning U.S. Pat. No. 7,139,761; 77 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2060; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Questionnaire for Non-Judicial Nominees; Affidavit executed by Micheile K. Lee Oct. 28, 2014; 40 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2061; lPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Davis, R., “PTAB's ‘Death Squad’ Label Not Totally Off-Base, Chief Says,” Law360, New York (Aug. 14, 2014) 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2062; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Graham et al., “The Brainy Bunch,” Intellectual Property: An ALM Supplement, Fall 2015, 7 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2063; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics, USPTO, Jan. 31, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2064; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Davis, R., “Fed. Circ. Reverses PTAB Nix of Synopsys Circuit Patent,” Law360, New York, Apr. 24, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2065; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Scheller et al. “Federal Circuit to PTAB: No Short Cuts Allowed,” The National Law Review; April 25, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2066; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Couturier, K. “How Europe is Going After Apple, Google and Other U.S. Tech Giants,” New York Times, Apr. 13, 2015, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2067; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Manjoo, F., “Tech Giants Seem Invincible. That Worries Lawmakers.” New York Times, Jan. 4, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2068; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Quinn et al., “Michelle Lee's views on patent quality out of touch with reality facing patent applicants,” IPWatchdog®, Feb. 2, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2069; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Quinn, (G., “Michelle Lee launches PTAB initiative to ‘shape and improve’ IPR proceedings,” IPWatohdog®, Apr. 10, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2070; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Kampis, J., “Google employees have enjoyed revolving door during Obama administration,” watchdog.org, Aug. 8, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2071; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Dayen, D., “The Android Administration,” The lntercept_, Apr. 22, 2016, 16 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2072; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Editor Charlie, “@scleland: How Google is Anti-employment Anti-property & Pro-regulation,” Artist Rights Watch, News for the Artist Rights Advocacy Community, Nov. 18, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2073; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Press Release: “Voip-Pal Issues a Correction to its Press Release of Sep. 18th 2017,” Voip-Pal.Com Inc., Jan. 11, 2018, 1 page. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2074; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; “Former head of Google patent strategy appointed to run U.S. patent agency,” ai (/Profile/12836/AppleInsider), Dec. 12, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2075; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Vermont, S. “IPR Statistics Revisited: Yep, It's A Patent Killing Field,” PatentAttorney.com, Feb. 8, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2076; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Sterne et al., “PTAB Death Squads: Are All Commercialiy Viable Patents Invalid?” IPWatohdog®, Mar. 24, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Volp-Pal Exhibit 2077; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Sheafe, B., “Dear Congress: A Small Request on Behalf of the Innovators You (Theoretically) Represent: Part 2,” IPWire, Jan. 12, 2018, 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2078; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Brachmann, S., “Are conflicts of interest at the PTAB leading to preferential decisions for Apple?” IPWatchdog®, Apr. 28, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2079; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Quinn et al., “Patent owners do not like IPRs despite what Bloomberg Law, AIPLA study says,” IPWatchdog®, Feb. 6, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2080; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; “Does Google's Michelle Lee Work for Both Google and the U.S. Patent Office at the Same Time?” The Corruption Times, Your Public New WIKI for Social Updateds, Apr. 6, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2081; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Morinville, P., “The Senate Must Vet Vishal Amin,”IPWatchdog®, Apr. 23. 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2082; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; The New York Times “May 15, 1911 | Supreme Court Orders Standard Oil to Be Broken Up,” By the Learning Network, May 15, 2012, 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2083; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Simpson et al., “PTAB Kill Rates: How IPRs are Affecting Patents,” Law360, New York, Sep. 15, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2084; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Vermont, S., “IPR Statistics Revisited: Yep, It's a Patent Killing Field,” PatentAttorney.com, Feb. 8, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2085; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Robinson, E., “Why the Unified Patents Model Would Not Work in China,” IPWatchdog®, Apr. 26, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2086; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Brachmann et al., “US Inventor sets patents on fire as part of PTAB protest at USPTO,” IPWatchdog®, Aug. 11, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2087; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; “Selection process for assigning judges to expanded PTAB panels,” 717 Madison Place, Aug. 28, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2088; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Eden, S., “How the U.S. Patent Office Got So Screwed Up,” Popular Mechanics, Jun. 21, 2016, 21 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2089; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Quinn, G., “Supreme Court to decide if Inter Partes Review is Unconstitutional,” IPWatchdog®, Jun. 12, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2090; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Quinn, G., “Industry reaction to SCOTUS patent venue decision in TC Heartland v. Kraft Food Group,” IPWatchdog®, May 22, 2017, 7 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2091; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Flibbert et al., “5 Distinctions Between IPRS and District Court Patent Litigation,” Finnegan, Dec. 16, 2015, 6 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2092; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; “2404. Hobbs Act—Under Color of Officiai Right,” USAM, Department of Justice, 5 pages. |
| Voip-Pal EXHIBIT 2093; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; “Selection process for assigning judges to expanded PTAB panels,” 717 Madison Place, Aug. 28, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2094; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; “2015 Summary of Ethics Rules,” Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. 16 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2095; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; “Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics,” United States Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO, Mar. 31, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Voip-Pal Exhibit 2096; IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201; Madigan etal., “Turning Gold to Lead: How Patent Eligibility Doctrine is Undermining U.S. Leadership in Innovation,” George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 17-16, Mar. 30, 2017, 21 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Patent Owner; Cases IPR2016-01198 and IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005 B2 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815 B2; Order, Conduct of Proceeding, 37 C.F.R. ξ 42.5, for both proceedings; Paper No. 62, Entered: Jan. 19, 2018, 4 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. VOLP-PAL.COM, INC., Patent Owner; IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Notice of Appeal, Dated: Jan. 22, 2018, 5 pages. |
| Apple EXHIBIT 1022, IPR2016-01198, Telephonic Hearing Before the Administrative Patent Judges; Jan. 19th, 2018; 14 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial snd Appeal Board; APPLE INC., Petitioner, v. VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Patent Owner; IPR2016-01201, U.S. Patent No. 8,542,815; Notice of Appeal, Dated: Jan. 22, 2018, 5 pages. |
| Apple EXHIBIT 1022, IPR2016-01201, Telephonic Hearing Before the Administrative Patent Judges; Jan. 19th, 2018; 14 pages. |
| Case: 18-1456; Document: 1-1; Filed: Jan. 23, 2018, 1 page: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Notice of Docketing; 18-1456—Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.; Date of Docketing: Jan. 23, 2018, IPR2016-01198; 1 page. |
| Case: 18-1456; Document: 1-2; Filed: Jan. 23, 2018, 34 pages: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.Com, Inc., Patent Owner; IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Notice Of Appeal, (Dated: Jan. 22, 2018, 5 pages); with Paper 53; Entered: Nov. 20, 2017; Final Written Decision; 35 U.S.C. ξ 318(a) and 37 C.F.R. ξ 42.73; (29 pages). |
| Case: 18-1456; Document 6; Filed: Jan. 25, 2018; 14 pages: In the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Apple Inc., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner-Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Case No. IPR2016-01198; Motion of Appellant Apple Inc. to Stay Appeal or for a Limited Remand to Allow Conclusion of Administrative Proceedings. |
| Case: 18-1457; Document: 1-1; Filed: Jan. 23, 2018, 1 page: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Notice of Docketing; 18-1457—Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.; Date of Docketing: Jan. 23, 2018, IPR2016-01201; 1 page. |
| Case: 18-1457; Document: 1-2; Filed: Jan. 232018, 34 pages: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Notice of Appeal, (Dated: Jan. 22, 2018, 5 pages); with Paper 54; Entered: Nov. 20, 2017; Final Written Decision; 35 U.S.C. ξ 318(a) and 37 C.F.R. ξ 42.73; (29 pages). |
| Case: 18-1457; Document 6; Filed: Jan. 25, 2018; 14 pages: In the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Apple Inc., Petitioner-Appellant, v. VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Patent Owner-Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Case No. IPR2016-01201; Motion of Appellant Apple Inc. to Stay Appeal or for a Limited Remand to Allow Conclusion of Administrative Proceedings. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Petitioner's Reply in Support of its Motion for Entry of Judgment in Favor of Petitioner as a Sanction for Improper Ex Parte Communications By Patent Owner, or, Alternatively, for New and Constitutionally Correct Proceedings, Date: Jan. 26, 2018, 11 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Volp-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01198, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,005; Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List, Date: Jan. 26, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Apple EXHIBIT 1023, IPR2016-01198, Voip-Pal Issues a Correction to its Press Release of September 18th 2017; Jan. 12, 2018, 1 page. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Petitioner's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Entry of Judgment in Favor of Petitioner as a Sanction for Improper Ex Parte Communications by Patent Owner, or, Alternatively, for New and Constitutionally Correct Proceedings, Date: Jan. 26, 2018, 11 pages. |
| United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Apple Inc., Petitioner, v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Patent Owner; Case No. IPR2016-01201, U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,815; Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List, Date: Jan. 26, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Apple EXHIBIT 1023, IPR2016-01201, Voip-Pal Issues a Correction to its Press Release of Sep. 18th 2017; Jan. 12, 2018, 1 page. |
| Case: 18-1456; Document 7; Filed: Jan. 29, 2018; 2 pages: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Order; consolidating the appeals. |
| Case: 18-1457; Document 7; Filed: Jan. 29, 2018; 2 pages: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Order; consolidating the appeals. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150327320 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14092831 | Nov 2013 | US |
| Child | 14802872 | US | |
| Parent | 13496864 | US | |
| Child | 14092831 | US |
