Not Applicable. The underlying engineering concept of the system is that of post tensioning reinforcement of Concrete Masonry Units. It is believed that the first teaching of the post tensioning system was by the Bolt-A-Block system which was filed Nov. 10, 2005 by Roger Marsh et al (the same inventors) with Ser. No. 11/271,703. What the present invention entails is significant new features and improvements to the block system and features of assembly not shown or present in the Bolt-A-Blok system.
This invention relates to a unitized masonry structure, particularly structures with post tensioned reinforcement. The present invention relates generally to all types of general construction where a common mortar and hollow block or brick combination is utilized and relates to other construction means for structures as well.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
The new unitized masonry structure described in this specification is a construction system that is designed to easily and quickly install in any location without the need for mortar, water, or power. In the United States alone there are over 4000 block manufacturing companies. Traditionally, building blocks and bricks are attached to each other by either of two methods. The first is by gravity, which includes stacking, arches, and flying buttresses. The second is by mortar and mortar equivalent methods, such as various types of mortar, epoxy, or blocks having their cores filled with concrete, with or without reinforcing steel bars (rebars). This attachment usually includes mortar with reinforcing wire in the joints and also includes attachment between masonry units with concrete and rebars in such shapes as bond beam blocks and pier blocks.
When reinforcement means have been used with block, it is typically accomplished with either long rebars or long steel rods or stranded cables placed in the cavities called ducts. The usual reinforcement is without any tensioning of the steel reinforcement, either pre-tensioning or post tensioning. Pre and post tensioning, as one well skilled in the art of construction engineering and techniques knows, increases the overall strength of the concrete unit. Until recently, post tensioning has only been used with a complete stack of block in conjunction with the placement of mortar between each layer. Up to now, most specialty block systems with rods and plates have required very complex design and high levels of skill by construction designers and engineers.
In the latter months of 2005, a newer technique of a bolt, block and bar system—called Bolt-A-Blok—introduced a basic unitized post tensioning where a loose bar is utilized as an anchor across the hollow cavity (or duct) of a concrete masonry unit (CMU) or block. The bar (anchor) has apertures with and without threads which are then individually connected by a through bolt which is essentially the tendon. The bolt (tendon) and bar (anchor) network required some care in the placement of the bar to assure uniformity of the reinforcement web of the tendons and anchors. The improved method and system described in this new system called a UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES has been devised that essentially “locates” the bars uniformly in a recessed cavity or in a pocket of the concrete masonry unit (CMU). Another embodiment of the new system eliminates bar placement entirely by embedding the bars into the CMU during the manufacturing of the block. These new configurations eliminate any gap between the adjacent CMUs. No filling or caulking of the space is required. Various other embodiments and improvements are described which greatly enhance the post tensioning system first introduced under the Bolt-A-Blok system established as prior art.
A. Introduction of the Problems Addressed
Since most masonry structures use mortar, several things are required. First, the mortar requires water. Second, in most cases, the laying of block requires a skilled block or brick mason. Third, a means of power to mix the mortar is normal. Fourth, elaborate bracing and reinforcement is needed until the mortar cures and reaches its strength. During this curing time the overall structure is “fragile” to wind, severe temperatures, and other natural weather and environmental conditions. During curing, occupation and use of the structure is unwise. Scaffolding often remains in place awaiting some cure before additional blocks are added to the height of the structure. If proper preparation and care are not provided to reduce the environmental impacts, the mortar and overall structure may result in cracking and diminished structural strength.
Reinforcing means 51 are often provided to improve strength (as shown in
Finally, once built, the traditional masonry systems become a fixed structure. Unless very special and complex features provisions are added to the normal block, rebar and mortar system, the structure is essentially not re-useable and must be “demolished” to be removed.
These stated requirements each limit the use of the traditional masonry with mortar system. The new system called Bolt-A-Blok facilitated a clear improvement to traditional construction systems and their limitations. The Bolt-A-Blok system does not require special skills to construct; does not need water and power; does not require elaborate bracing; provides immediate occupancy or use; needs no curing time; and, is re-useable if desired since it is not destroyed when disassembled and moved. Bolt-A-Blok system was an improvement to decrease the time to build or rebuild areas with minimal skilled labor. The Bolt-A-Blok system provides a far superior and more consistent strength structure than the traditional mortar constructed structure.
While the Bolt-A-Blok system addressed many of the common requirements and limitations to traditional mortar and block construction methods, the system has some room for improvement. These improvements are addressed by the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES described below. The improvements over Bolt-A-Blok include:
B. Prior Art
Historically, few patented devices have attempted to address the problem as stated. The building industry has made little progress for a unitized, post tension system. Even so, blocks have required very special and often complex configurations to even handle rods and plates and then the have taught only limit rods in special blocks. One such device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,511,902 (1996) issued to Center which teaches an Instant levy block system. This is a complex, specially made block for constructing a levy, comprising a plurality of blocks, a plurality of connecting pegs, and a plurality of stakes. Each part is uniquely designed and made whereas the new UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES as described here utilizes a uniform, readily available block design for a concrete masonry unit (CMU).
Another block device is described in A U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,732 which was issued to Farmer, Sr. et al (1998) which teaches a masonry block with an embedded plate. The concrete masonry block has an external plate or plates that are anchored through the concrete masonry block. The external plates are cast into the concrete masonry block in the mold during casting. These plates and metal pieces are not taught as being part of a post tensioning system now shown cast within the hollow cavities as addressed by the new UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES.
Another device for construction is taught by U.S. Pat. No. 6,098,357 issued to Franklin et al. (2000). This art discloses a modular pre-cast construction block system with a wall subsystem and a foundation subsystem. The wall subsystem has a number of wall units having cavities and pre-stressed tension cables are cast therein the cavity. This teaches precast walls and pass through cable which are specially made, require water, and are not readily re-useable like the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES. Also, the tensioning system is not unitized or placed throughout the entire structure.
A somewhat re-useable system 49 is taught in the U.S. Pat. No. 6,178,714 issued to Carney, Jr. (2001) (as shown in
A Mortar less wall structure is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,691,471 issued to Price (2004). Here a wall structure comprising of columns of preformed, lightweight, stacked blocks, with the columns of blocks connected to each other by elongated, vertically oriented, support beams. Preferably, the wall structure is operatively connected to a structure by one or more brackets. The beams and blocks are special configuration, not readily available and with limited uses.
A pre-cast, modular spar system having a cylindrical open-ended spar 55 of relatively uniform cross section is taught in a U.S. Pat. No. 6,244,785 issued to Richter, et al (2001) (as shown in
An interlocking, mortar less system is accomplished by some other devices. However, none of them are found to show a structural unitized post tensioning system as described for the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES in the materials below. An example of one such interlocking device 56 is taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,640,071 issued to Haener (1987). This is shown as
The Bolt-A-Block system was filed Nov. 10, 2005 by Roger Marsh et al with Ser. No. 11/271,703. This basic mortar less system taught a masonry structure comprising a plurality of regular masonry blocks and/or bricks connected to each other by a plurality of metal bars and a plurality of standard metal threaded fasteners thereby forming a post tensioned structure. This Bolt-A-Block system is generally shown in
Traditional post-tensioned units 52 may have various configurations (as shown in
Traditional Post-Tensioned reinforcing consists of very high strength steel strands or bars. Typically, strands are used in horizontal applications like foundations, slabs, beams, and bridges; and bars are used in vertical applications like walls and columns. A typical steel strand used for post-tensioning has a tensile strength of 270,000 pounds per square inch. This actually teaches against the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES use of individual, standard bolts and simple fasteners. Post-tensioning using plates, or bars, between the masonry units is a totally new way of combining steel and concrete and is sound engineering practice.
None of the prior art teaches all the features and capabilities of the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES. As far as known, there are no systems at the present time which fully meet the need for a unitized, post-tensioned masonry block structure as well as the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES. It is believed that this system is made with component parts, is built with simple tools, needs no mortar, provides a much stronger structure than mortar structures, and is ready for immediate use and occupation upon construction.
A Unitized Post Tension Block System for Masonry STRUCTURES has been developed for use in constructing various types of masonry structures. UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES is a building system that demountably couples each individual hollow cored block or brick by use of a bar and bolt system. This coupling results in stronger, faster, and cheaper construction of buildings. While the three main components—a bar, a bolt and a block—are securely connected, the means of attachment is capable of full disassembly if desired. The UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES can be accomplished by unskilled persons with a simple wrench. There is no need for water, no special tools (a simple wrench will suffice), no bracing, and the structure made by the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES is ready for immediate use. The improved UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES features hollow core (duct) masonry units with recessed channels or pockets or with embedded bars, with a fastener bolt (tendon) and with a plate (anchor). The new features also teach a strong and durable full plate anchor for defensive and anti-terrorism structures.
There are many, many benefits and advantages of the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES just as there were with the prior art described above. There currently exist no construction systems that use readily available parts and are so easy to perform. However, by having the unitized post tensioning technology, the structure is a far stronger unit than one built by traditional mortar-using techniques. TABLE A shows a list of advantages and benefits over the prior art Bolt-A-Block system. TABLE B shows the list of advantages and benefits SIMILAR TO Bolt-A-Block for the advantages over traditional mortar and block systems.
For one skilled in the art of construction of structures, especially masonry, concrete, and steel structures, it is readily understood that the features shown in the examples with this system are readily adapted to other types of construction improvements.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an embodiment of the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM that is preferred. The drawings together with the summary description given above and a detailed description given below serve to explain the principles of the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM. It is understood, however, that the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM is not limited to only the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
The following list refers to the drawings:
The present invention is a construction system called a UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES 31. This post tensioning system is comprised of only a few different types of components—a hollow core block 35 (and others) in which the hollow cavity 48 is the duct, a series of tendons (such as a through bolt) 34, and a plurality of simple anchors (such as a bar) 33 with some additional features. The system is configured with the plurality of adjacent blocks 35 contiguous and touching one another and demountably coupled to each other by means of the tendons 34 and anchors 33. This coupling results in a structure that is formed from a plurality of unitized, post tensioned concrete masonry units (usually called blocks or bricks) that collectively are far stronger than an ordinary block structure built with mortar and standard reinforcing. A person having ordinary skill in the field of construction, especially with reinforced masonry structures, appreciates the various parts that may be used to physically permit this UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES 31 to be produced and utilized. The improvement over the existing art is providing a construction system that has many advantages and benefits as stated in the previous section entitled Objects, Advantages, and Benefits. The advantage over the newer Bolt-A-Blok includes precise placement of the anchor bar, faster build time with the recessed channels or the embedded bars, commercial tracking of the invention with the embedded bars, stronger military/defense use and anti-blast applications, features for easier, faster build with placement aids, and features with anti-turn and quick connections with oval plates/washers and threaded tendons.
There is shown in
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES 31 that are preferred. The drawings together with the summary description given above and a detailed description given below serve to explain the principles of the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES 31. It is understood, however, that the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES 31 is not limited to only the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
In
One should note that
In
In the FIGS. E and F are sketches of special configurations to aid in preventing moisture intrusion with blocks. In a mortar less system, gaps may permit some water seepage through the gap, even if the gap is miniscule.
The details mentioned here are exemplary and not limiting. Stated again and well appreciated by one skilled in the art of construction materials, all the examples of the materials may be substituted with other plastics and composite materials that have similar properties and still be within the scope and spirit of this UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES 31. Other components specific to describing a UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES 31 may be added as a person having ordinary skill in the field of construction as being obvious from the above described embodiment.
Operation of the Preferred Embodiment
The new UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM 31 has been described in the above embodiment. The manner of how the device operates is described below. Note well that the description above and the operation described here must be taken together to fully illustrate the concept of the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM 31.
A very special application for a heavy duty 87 UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM 31 is described in
Various other uses exist for the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM 31 as described here in TABLE D—EXAMPLES OF USES. These other uses are similar to those covered by Bolt-A-Blok system of unitized post tensioning. However, the instant UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM 31 has the many additional improvements described above for these uses.
With this description of the detailed parts and operation it is to be understood that the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM 31 is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment. The features of the UNITIZED POST TENSION BLOCK SYSTEM 31 are intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
838844 | Clayton | Dec 1906 | A |
952305 | Buskirk | Mar 1910 | A |
962463 | Phillips | Jun 1910 | A |
1753451 | Tonnelier | Apr 1930 | A |
1783383 | Montrief | Dec 1930 | A |
1892605 | Betzler | Dec 1932 | A |
2141397 | Locke | Dec 1938 | A |
2212184 | Powell | Aug 1940 | A |
2250763 | Hild | Jul 1941 | A |
2929236 | Steward et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
2963828 | Belliveau | Dec 1960 | A |
3236545 | Parkes et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3295286 | Schaich | Jan 1967 | A |
3296758 | Knudsen | Jan 1967 | A |
3382632 | Grofcsik | May 1968 | A |
3410044 | Moog | Nov 1968 | A |
3511000 | Keuls | May 1970 | A |
3763609 | Probst | Oct 1973 | A |
3785097 | Seymour | Jan 1974 | A |
4094222 | Lang et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4569167 | Staples | Feb 1986 | A |
4640071 | Haener | Feb 1987 | A |
4726567 | Greenberg | Feb 1988 | A |
4757656 | Powers, Jr. | Jul 1988 | A |
4854097 | Haener | Aug 1989 | A |
5007218 | Bengtson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5511902 | Center | Apr 1996 | A |
5589124 | Woolford et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5802792 | Fielding et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809732 | Farmer, Sr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5924254 | Franklin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5941565 | Clendenin, Jr. | Aug 1999 | A |
6065265 | Stenekes | May 2000 | A |
6098357 | Franklin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6138426 | Mork et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167669 | Lanc | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178714 | Carney, Jr. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6244785 | Richter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6282859 | Van Der Heijden | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6321498 | Trovato | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6431797 | Greenberg | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6513296 | Baden | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6557316 | Van Der Heijden | May 2003 | B2 |
6632048 | Greenberg | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6665992 | Hew | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6691471 | Price | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6758020 | Cerrato | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6904728 | Stutts | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915614 | Matsufuji | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6955015 | Manthei | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7124550 | Deming | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7415805 | Nickerson | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7461490 | Toledo | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20020041796 | Greenberg | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020134040 | Hew | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040020145 | Matsufuji | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040144059 | Keshmiri | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050183362 | McCarthy | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060168906 | Tonyan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201082 | Hammer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070017176 | Gray | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070056235 | Kohler | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070107333 | Marsh | May 2007 | A1 |
20070186502 | Marsh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080256894 | Marsh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Embed” and “contiguous,” Webster's Dictionary. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/271,703, filed Nov. 10, 2005, Roger Marsh et al. |
“Embed” and “Contiguous” Webster's Dictionary. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report, Application No. 2,627,760, Nov. 4, 2009. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report, Application No. 2,642,393, Mar. 15, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US06/17364, Aug. 7, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US06/17523, Sep. 18, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US08/060913, Aug. 21, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US07/082488, Sep. 9, 2008. |
Danish Patent and Trademark Office Singapore Written Opinion, Application No. 200803325-0, Apr. 22, 2009. |
Australian Government, IP Australia, Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, Written Opinion, Application No. 200805986-7, mailed Jul. 21, 2009. |
Hungarian Patent Office, Intellectual Property Office of Singapore. Written Opinion, Application No. 2009028671, mailed Apr. 15, 2010. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Office Action, Application No. 200680053837.6, mailed Apr. 1, 2010. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China , Office Action, Application No. 200680042078.3, mailed Dec. 25, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070186502 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |