Universal pickup

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8993868
  • Patent Number
    8,993,868
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 11, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 31, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A musical instrument pickup including an apparatus that allows for easy interchangement of magnets for modifying tone.
Description
PRIOR ART















2,455,575
December 1948
Fender et al.


2,896,491
July 1959
Lover


2,933,967
April 1960
Riscol


3,035,472
May 1962
Freeman


3,249,677
May 1966
Burns et al.


3,585,424
June 1971
Neel


4,096,780
June 1978
Dawson


4,145,944
March 1979
Helpinstill, II


4,348,930
September 1982
Chobanian et al.


4,372,187
February 1983
Berg


4,499,809
February 1985
Clevinger


4,534,258
August 1985
Anderson


4,535,668
August 1985
Schaller


4,581,974
April 1986
Fender


4,624,172
November 1986
McDougall


5,111,728
May 1992
Blucher et al.


5,148,733
September 1992
Beller


5,292,998
March 1994
Knapp


5,335,576
August 1994
Hayashi


5,336,845
August 1994
Lace, Sr.


5,389,731
February 1995
Lace


5,523,526
June 1996
Shattil


5,530,199
June 1996
Blucher


5,567,903
October 1996
Coopersmith et al.


5,610,357
March 1997
Frank-Braun


6,043,422
March 2000
Chapman


6,162,984
December 2000
Engard


6,476,309
November 2002
Gaglio


6,846,981
January 2005
Devers


6,849,792
February 2005
Yeakel


6,992,243
January 2006
Small


7,285,714
October 2007
Juszkiewicz et al.


7,375,276
May 2008
Kanayama et al.


2002/0069749
June 2002
Hoover et al.


2003/0051596
March 2003
Gustafsson


2005/0076775
April 2005
Small


2005/0126377
June 2005
Kanayama et al.


2006/0112816
June 2006
Kinman


2006/0150806
July 2006
Hara


2006/0272469
December 2006
Meisel


2007/0056435
March 2007
Juszkiewicz et al.


7,994,413
August 2011
Salo


2,455,575
December 1948
Fender et al.


2,896,491
July 1959
Lover









BACKGROUND

In general, a pickup is a coil of conductive wire wrapped around or glued to a permanent magnet. Nearby vibrating metal strings induce an alternating current at the frequency of vibration.


Prior to the embodiments of the present invention, there were only non-removable magnets in guitar pickups, meaning that the pickup only got the tonal characteristics of one type of magnet, and if a guitarist wanted a different tone, they would need to buy a different pickup all together, an expensive endeavor, or to take apart the pickup and force the magnet out, which is dangerous, difficult, voids the warranty of many pickups, and can only be done a finite number of times before the screws get stripped or the bobbins get over-drilled and structural integrity is compromised. In most types of pickups, it is desirable to keep magnets in place to avoid distortions in sound.


There are three types of standard pickups widely sold, the humbucker, single coil, and p90. A normal, standard humbucking guitar pickup has the following major components: a baseplate, a magnet, two coils, and 12 pole pieces, six on each coil. The coils are suspended over the baseplate by friction between the pole pieces, leaving a cavity between the two rows of pole pieces. This is where the bar magnet is glued or otherwise fixed in the pickup.


A normal, industry standard P90 has the following major components: two plastic/fiber bobbins, a wooden spacer, a metal spacer, a solid metal baseplate, and six pole pieces/screws (both to keep the pickup together and to conduct magnetic current). The bobbins are separated by the wooden spacer vertically, and around the spacer is wrapped the wire coil. The bottom bobbin (now connected to the completed coil) is then placed on top of the metal spacer, which is then placed on top of the baseplate. The magnets are epoxied on either side of the spacer, and the pickup is screwed together.


The single coil pickup is normally composed of these major parts: two magnets, two bobbins, a wooden spacer, and six pole pieces. The bobbins are placed on either side of the wooden spacer, and the coil is wrapped around the wooden spacer and in between the bobbins, creating the coil. Pole pieces are inserted through the bobbins and spacer and out the other end, sticking out a bit. Magnets are epoxied on either side of the part of the pole pieces that sticks out of the framework.


SUMMARY

A baseplate for an electromagnetic pickup that provides for more varied, more pleasing, louder, or in general, different types of sounds from the instrument as a result of changing the type, shape, strength, or other characteristic of the magnet, which in turn changes the magnetic characteristics of the field and the sound of the instrument. When a user would like to change their tone, all they have to do is get access to the apparatus, switch out the magnets, and replace the pickup, and the effect is a completely different sound. In tandem with a coil tap, one can get almost every sound possible from any guitar pickup without paying thousands of dollars to buy more and more of them for different sounds. Even alone, without a coil tap, much of the same goal is achieved. Additionally, in tandem with an apparatus that allows one to access the pickup easily, this would make it so easy to change magnets that one could do so in the middle of a show. All in all, what we have here is an extremely useful, novel apparatus that musicians can use to tailor their sounds to different types of music by changing magnets.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1-9 are of a humbucker embodiment of the invention. They are in the standard engineering 9-view, in which the pickup or baseplate is drawn as it would look if you rotated it onto the part of the sheet the drawing is located on, the axis of revolution being parallel to the side of the paper the pickup is being drawn on. Therefore, FIG. 1 is a top view of the baseplate. FIG. 2 is a side view of the baseplate turned upside down, having been rotated 90 degrees over the x axis. FIG. 3 is a side view of the baseplate turned right-side up, having been rotated 90 degrees over the x axis in the other direction. FIGS. 4 and 5 are oblique views of the baseplate, having been rotated 45 degrees over the x-axis and the y-axis. FIGS. 6 and 9 are small-side views of the baseplate, having been rotated 90 degrees over the y axis. FIGS. 7 and 8 are oblique views of the baseplate, having been rotated 45 degrees over the x axis and the y axis in the opposite directions as FIGS. 4 and 5.



FIGS. 10-18 are of a P-90 embodiment of the invention. They are in the standard engineering 9-view, in which the pickup or baseplate is drawn as it would look if you rotated it onto the part of the sheet the drawing is located on, the axis of revolution being parallel to the side of the paper the pickup is being drawn on. Therefore, FIG. 1 is a top view of the baseplate. FIG. 2 is a side view of the baseplate turned upside down, having been rotated 90 degrees over the x axis. FIG. 3 is a side view of the baseplate turned right-side up, having been rotated 90 degrees over the x axis in the other direction. FIGS. 4 and 5 are oblique views of the baseplate, having been rotated 45 degrees over the x axis and the y axis. FIGS. 6 and 9 are small-side views of the baseplate, having been rotated 90 degrees over the y axis. FIGS. 7 and 8 are oblique views of the baseplate, having been rotated 45 degrees over the x axis and the y axis in the opposite directions as FIGS. 4 and 5.



FIGS. 19-27 are of a single-coil embodiment of the invention. They are in the standard engineering 9-view, in which the pickup or baseplate is drawn as it would look if you rotated it onto the part of the sheet the drawing is located on, the axis of revolution being parallel to the side of the paper the pickup is being drawn on. Therefore, FIG. 1 is a top view of the pickup. FIG. 2 is a side view of the pickup turned upside down, having been rotated 90 degrees over the x axis. FIG. 3 is a side view of the pickup turned right-side up, having been rotated 90 degrees over the x axis in the other direction. FIGS. 4 and 5 are oblique views of the pickup, having been rotated 45 degrees over the x axis and the y axis. FIGS. 6 and 9 are small-side views of the pickup, having been rotated 90 degrees over the y axis. FIGS. 7 and 8 are oblique views of the pickup, having been rotated 45 degrees over the x axis and the y axis in the opposite directions as FIGS. 4 and 5.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention allows the user to arbitrarily exchange magnets without the hassle of soldering or the expense of a completely new coil and pickup, and makes modification of sound much easier. Additionally, if used in conjunction with an apparatus that allows the pickup to be removed from the guitar without a screwdriver, then the embodiments of the present invention allow the user a fast way to get a completely different tone almost immediately. This effect is enhanced even more by the possible addition of a coil tap, creating a tonally adjustable pickup.


The embodiments of the present invention are improvements on standard pickups. If a baseplate as described in the claims is present on the bottom of a pickup, switching out magnets in order to get a different tone is made simple and cost-effective in comparison to purchasing and installing a completely new pickup.


All types of pickups, including stacked humbuckers, single coils, lace sensors, p90s, rail buckers, etc. could all benefit in the same way from the ideas in this invention.


Another benefit of the embodiments of the present invention is that it requires no soldering to change the tone after the initial installation of the pickup, so it will be easier for people to get a different sound even if they do have multiple pickups.


Additionally, all forms of the embodiments of the present invention, if built with appropriate materials, provide extra shielding from RF interference, which increases sound quality of the pickup.


Although there are various modifications and embodiments of the present invention, it should be understood that any such embodiments and modifications fall under the scope, spirit, and essence of the current invention and its contribution to the art.


Embodiment 1
Humbucker

The first embodiment of the current invention is, in essence, a new baseplate for a humbucking pickup that allows the user to change magnets, thus changing the strength, shape, and structure of the magnetic field.


Refer to FIGS. 1-9 of in the drawings to see the way this baseplate is structured. A “wing” (2) attached to the plate (5) by a hinge (4) replaces the normal, solid plate structure that is normally in that place. A locking mechanism (3), a locking hinge, or any apparatus that keeps the wing in place and allows for it to be moved can be used to make sure the pickup doesn't become unstable. This allows for the user to swing out the “wing” (2), slide out the magnet from the pickup (which is located in between 1a and 1b), and replace the magnet. As the magnet slides into the pickup, it is stopped in the correct place by a small “tooth” (1b) that keeps it from being displaced as the pickup is moved around. Once the “wing” (2) is closed, another “tooth” (1a) keeps the magnet in place from the other direction. The magnet is kept static longitudinally (along the Y-axis in reference to FIG. 1) by the other various apparatuses that are present in humbucking pickups. In some embodiments, two more teeth could be added running latitudinally (along the X axis in reference to FIG. 1) to keep it in place this way.


Other ways this aspect of the invention could be built include but are not limited to: different types of locking mechanisms, including but not limited to locking hinges either running latitudinally or longitudinally that would allow magnet removal and secural by locking at, for example, a 180 degree angle, slideable locks that could keep moving parts of the pickup in place, and once unlocked, allowed for removal of the magnet, and “snaps” that could act as ways to secure moving parts of the pickup that swing out latitudinally, longitudinally, or vertically (along the z axis in reference to FIG. 1), and when un-snapped could allow for magnet removal; “wings” that are shaped differently (rectangular, square, triangular, et cetera, are smaller in size, or come out in different ways (i.e. longitudinally or longitudinally instead of vertically); different mechanisms to keep the magnet in place (i.e. springs running longitudinally that support the magnet and keep it from moving, be they attached to the moving part, within the pickup's body itself, or attached in any other place, or an indentation running longitudinally or latitudinally and depressed vertically in the shape of the magnet to lock it in place instead of “teeth” (1a and 1b)); different materials used in the 146 baseplate (for example, aluminum nickel-alloys, brass, or any other material); and the abandonment of “wings” (2) in favor of a simple indentation or slot with a method of securing the pickup such as a “door” running latitudinally or longitudinally that could slideably or swingingly move to secure or allow removal of the pickup; “hooks” protruding vertically from the baseplate to keep the magnet from falling out without having to epoxy it; or in general any sort of mechanical magnet changing system that allows the user to take the magnet in and out of the pickup.


Embodiment 2
P90

The second embodiment of the current invention is in essence a new type of baseplate for a P90 pickup that allows the user to change magnets, thus changing the strength, shape, and structure of the magnetic field.



FIGS. 10-18 of the drawings show its different views. In essence, this baseplate is different from the standard P90 due to the “wings” (2) that swing out longitudinally from the pickup. They swing out from a pivot joint (1). To change magnets, the “wings” are swung out, the magnet is taken out from its holding place in the wing (or from the inside of the pickup), a new magnet is placed into the wing, and the wing is swung back in. Due to the slightly large size of some wings, a taller metal spacer (3) may be necessary to put the pickup together.


Other ways this aspect of the invention could be built include but are not limited to: different types of locking mechanisms, including but not limited to locking hinges either running latitudinally or longitudinally that would allow magnet removal, slideable locks that could keep moving parts of the pickup in place, and once unlocked, allow for removal of the magnet, and “snaps” that could act as ways to secure moving parts of the pickup that swing out latitudinally, longitudinally, or vertically (along the z axis in reference to FIG. 10), and when un-snapped could allow for magnet removal; “wings” that are shaped differently (rectangular, square, triangular, et cetera, are smaller in size, or come out in different ways (i.e. longitudinally or latitudinally instead of vertically); different mechanisms to keep the magnet in place (i.e. springs running longitudinally or latitudinally that support the magnet and keep it from moving, be they attached to the moving part, within the pickup's body itself, or attached in any other place, or an indentation running longitudinally or latitudinally and depressed vertically in the shape of the magnet to lock it in place instead of “teeth” (1a and 1b)); different materials used in the baseplate (for example, aluminum nickel-alloys, brass, or any other material); “wings” that slide out instead of swinging out, different types of joints to keep the “wings” in place (such as a simple screw and nut instead of the pivot joint (1)), and the abandonment of “wings” (2) in favor of a simple indentation or slot with a method of securing the pickup such as a “door” running latitudinally, longitudinally, or vertically that could slideably or swingingly move to secure or allow removal of the pickup; “hooks” protruding vertically from the baseplate to keep the magnet from falling out without having to epoxy it; or in general any sort of mechanical magnet changing system that allows the user to take the magnet in and out of the pickup.


Embodiment 3
Single Coil

The third embodiment is essentially a new type of baseplate for a single coil pickup that allows the user to change magnets, thus changing the strength, shape, and structure of the magnetic field.


Refer to FIGS. 19-27 for the final part of the current invention. The final part of the current invention is a type of case/baseplate (3) that can be screwed on and off of the pickup (with thumb screws, to be user friendly) (4) and keeps the magnets in place, allowing for interchangement of magnets (1) by replacing them in the case. The magnets are kept still by the protrusion of the pole pieces (2) that act as a spacer. The embodiments of the present invention also has the added benefit of acting as extra shielding to the pickup if made from the right material, and can be conducive to stopping RF interference. Other embodiments could benefit in the same way. Other ways this aspect of the invention could be built include but are not limited to: building a larger or smaller case for the magnets; building a case for the magnets that was screwed on to the pickup in a different way; building a case for the magnets that swung off or did not screw onto the pickup at all, including but not limited to a similar case that would swing out and have a method of being secured back in place; and a case that didn't have to be fully removed, but from which the magnets could be removed.


The present invention has been described in an illustrative manner. It is to be understood that the terminology which has been used is intended to be in the nature of words of description rather than of limitation.


The preceding are but three of the various modifications and embodiments of the embodiments of the present invention. It should be understood that other embodiments and modifications will fall under the scope, spirit, and essence of the current invention and its contribution to the art.

Claims
  • 1. A pickup for a stringed musical instrument having a baseplate adapted to allow removal and replacement of at least one magnet without irreversible modification to the musical instrument pickup, the baseplate comprising at least one wing or casing adapted to swingingly or slideably allow removal and replacement of the at least one magnet without requiring removal of the baseplate from the pickup.
  • 2. The pickup as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wing comprises a raised portion that secures the magnet(s) in place.
  • 3. The pickup as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wing comprises a cavity or indentation that secures the magnet(s) in place.
  • 4. The pickup as set forth in claim 1 wherein the baseplate comprises a locking hinge.
  • 5. The pickup as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wing has a means of being secured into place.
  • 6. The pickup as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wing comprises one or more tabs adapted to secure the magnet(s) into place along a longitudinal axis of the pickup.
  • 7. The pickup as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wing is attached to the baseplate by a pivot joint or hinge joint.
  • 8. The pickup as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wing comprises one or more tabs adapted to secure the magnet(s) into place along a latitudinal axis of the pickup.
  • 9. The pickup as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wing shields the pickup from electromagnetic interference.
  • 10. The pickup as set forth in claim 1 wherein the wing has a means of preventing magnet vibration.
  • 11. A baseplate for a stringed musical instrument pickup adapted to allow removal and replacement of at least one magnet without irreversible modification to the musical instrument pickup, the baseplate comprising at least one wing or casing adapted to swingingly or slideably allow removal and replacement of the at least one magnet without requiring removal of the baseplate from the pickup.
  • 12. The pickup as set forth in claim 11 wherein the wing comprises a raised portion that secures the magnet(s) in place.
  • 13. The pickup as set forth in claim 11 wherein the wing comprises a cavity or indentation that secures the magnet(s) in place.
  • 14. The pickup as set forth in claim 11 wherein the baseplate comprises a locking hinge.
  • 15. The pickup as set forth in claim 11 wherein the wing has a means of being secured into place.
  • 16. The pickup as set forth in claim 11 wherein the wing comprises one or more tabs adapted to secure the magnet(s) into place along a longitudinal axis of the pickup.
  • 17. The pickup as set forth in claim 11 wherein the wing is attached to the baseplate by a pivot joint or hinge joint.
  • 18. The pickup as set forth in claim 11 wherein the wing comprises one or more tabs adapted to secure the magnet(s) into place along a latitudinal axis of the pickup.
  • 19. The pickup as set forth in claim 11 wherein the wing shields the pickup from electromagnetic interference.
  • 20. The pickup as set forth in claim 11 wherein the wing has a means of preventing magnet vibration.
US Referenced Citations (67)
Number Name Date Kind
2455575 Fender et al. Dec 1948 A
2896491 Lover Jul 1959 A
2933967 Riscol Apr 1960 A
3035472 Freeman May 1962 A
3249677 Burns et al. May 1966 A
3475543 Burns Oct 1969 A
3585424 Neel Jun 1971 A
3992972 Rickard Nov 1976 A
4069732 Moskowitz et al. Jan 1978 A
4096780 Dawsom Jun 1978 A
4145944 Helpinstill, II Mar 1979 A
4348930 Chobanian et al. Sep 1982 A
4372187 Berg Feb 1983 A
4425831 Lipman Jan 1984 A
4433603 Siminoff Feb 1984 A
4499809 Clevinger Feb 1985 A
4534258 Anderson Aug 1985 A
4535668 Schaller Aug 1985 A
4581974 Fender Apr 1986 A
4624172 McDougall Nov 1986 A
4854210 Palazzolo Aug 1989 A
5029511 Rosendahl Jul 1991 A
5111728 Blucher et al. May 1992 A
5148733 Beller Sep 1992 A
5252777 Allen Oct 1993 A
5276276 Gunn Jan 1994 A
5292998 Knapp Mar 1994 A
5335576 Hayashi Aug 1994 A
5336845 Lace, Sr. Aug 1994 A
5389731 Lace Feb 1995 A
5523526 Shattil Jun 1996 A
5530199 Blucher Jun 1996 A
5567903 Coopersmith et al. Oct 1996 A
5610357 Frank-Braun Mar 1997 A
5614688 Donnell Mar 1997 A
5659833 FitzGerald Aug 1997 A
5767432 Randolph Jun 1998 A
6043422 Chapman Mar 2000 A
6111184 Cloud et al. Aug 2000 A
6162984 Engard Dec 2000 A
6240930 Yuhara Jun 2001 B1
6378173 Ho et al. Apr 2002 B1
6476309 Gaglio Nov 2002 B2
6846981 Devers Jan 2005 B2
6849792 Yeakel Feb 2005 B2
6992243 Small Jan 2006 B2
7060888 Spalt Jun 2006 B2
7285714 Juszkiewics et al. Oct 2007 B2
7375276 Kanayama et al. May 2008 B2
7838758 Van Ekstrom Nov 2010 B2
7994413 Salo Aug 2011 B2
8178774 Salehi May 2012 B2
8283552 van Ekstrom Oct 2012 B2
8575466 van Ekstrom Nov 2013 B2
8680389 Yamanaka Mar 2014 B2
20020152659 Hartill Oct 2002 A1
20030140938 Evans et al. Jul 2003 A1
20050120871 Spalt Jun 2005 A1
20070245884 Yamaya Oct 2007 A1
20080164259 Coe et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168884 Redard Jul 2008 A1
20090183626 Salehi Jul 2009 A1
20110232465 Salehi Sep 2011 A1
20120028297 Zook et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120262618 Weakly Oct 2012 A1
20130098228 Tetsuro Apr 2013 A1
20130327202 Mills Dec 2013 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
“Vintage Vibe Guitars SP-90 and H540-42 SW Pickups” by Dave Hunter, Guitar Player; Sep. 2009; 43, 9; p. 98.
http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/pickups/184398-broke-my-f-kin-pup-changing-magnet.html (Demonstrating need) http://www.ehow.com/how—7597119—change-magnets-fender-squier-pickups.html (Non obvious).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140251117 A1 Sep 2014 US