Not applicable.
The present invention is directed to a universal pump platform (UPP) commissioning system for deep water pipelines. More specifically, the UPP comprises a platform containing an electric motor that drives a hydraulic pump for producing high pressure hydraulic fluid and one or more pumps powered by the hydraulic fluid from the hydraulic pump. The pump(s) is selected for cleaning, filling, chemical treating, pigging, hydrostatic testing or dewatering the pipeline. The UPP is suspended from a vessel by an umbilical that provides the electric current for the electric motor.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,539,778; 6,840,088; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,281,880 are directed to pumping skids that are connected to a subsea vehicle (SV) to carry out pipeline commissioning methods. By their design, the pumping skids are attached to the underside of the SV and require the SV to power the pumps on the skid. When commissioning a pipeline, the skid and SV act as a single unit.
The present invention employs an independent Universal Pumping Platform that has its own power supply provided by an umbilical from a vessel to an electric motor that drives a hydraulic pump for producing high pressure hydraulic fluid. This hydraulic fluid is then used to power one or more pumps depending on the specific commissioning operation. The UPP is independent, structurally or for a source of power, of any SV or ROV used in the commissioning operations.
The present invention is directed to a Universal Pumping Platform (UPP) that comprises a platform containing an electric motor that drives a hydraulic pump for producing high pressure hydraulic fluid and one or more pumps powered by the hydraulic fluid from the hydraulic pump. The pump is selected for the desired commissioning method to be carried out, such as hydrostatic testing or dewatering the pipeline. The UPP is suspended from a vessel by an umbilical that provides the electric current for the electric motor supported by the UPP.
Subsea pipelines are utilized to transport the discovered product from wells drilled subsea to a variety of disposition points. These points include existing or new offshore platforms, new pipelines or old pipelines, all of which are transporting the hydrocarbon products to onshore facilities. The pipelines terminate subsea in manifolds, used herein as a generic term, to include for example, wellhead trees, pipeline end manifolds (PLEMs), and pipeline end terminators (PLETs), to name a few. As new wells are completed, subsea pipelines form a matrix of flow for the oil/gas products that are tied through these manifolds to bring the product to shore. As dictated by law, the new sections of pipeline require hydrostatic testing to make certain that the line has no leaks. In addition to hydrostatic testing, other steps in the commissioning of the pipeline may be required, including flooding, pigging, cleaning, and installing chemicals that prepare the pipeline for hydrostatic testing or dewatering and drying that may follow the successful hydrostatic testing.
Once a well is completed, a pipeline is connected to the production well pipelines for transporting the product to shore. The pipeline commissioned by the present invention often does not extend all the way to shore but is at the outer part of the matrix, a section or segment measured in hundreds or thousand of feet. Also common to a manifold as used herein is that there is structure to provide internal access to the pipeline, with a structure known as a hot stab. The subsea performance or operation of the commissioning methods of the present invention will be described as commissioning a pipeline between two manifolds or PLEMs, or between two hot stab points in the pipeline.
The present invention relates to the commissioning of these subsea pipelines carried out on the pipelines on the seabed by using a Universal Pumping Platform (UPP) that is suspended by an umbilical from a vessel. An umbilical is a composite cable. The function of the cable is multipurpose in that it provides (1) electric current from the vessel to the platform, for the hydraulic pump(s) and possibly lights, instrumentation, or other functions; (2) data transmission; (3) strength for supporting the platform at the tethered position or depth.
Referring to
A Universal Pumping Platform (UPP) 20 comprises a non-buoyant structure consisting of a metal, preferably aluminum, frame that supports an electric motor that drives a hydraulic pump for producing high pressure hydraulic fluid and one or more pumps powered by the hydraulic fluid for the desired commissioning method of hydrostatic testing or dewatering the pipeline. The UPP is suspended from a vessel by an umbilical 22 that provides the electric current for an electric motor supported by the UPP.
The platform (UPP) is highly flexible in that one or more electric lines may be in the umbilical composite cable. Thus, one or more electric motors may power hydraulic pumps or water pumps. A hydraulic pump on the platform will provide high pressure hydraulic fluid to power a single pump or a plurality of pumps for pumping water suitable to meet the design requirements of the specific commissioning method at the depth pressures and pipe sizes of a specific subsea pipeline. The requirements for hydrostatic testing, for example, is a single pump, or a plurality of pumps, for pumping seawater at high pressure into a pipeline to increase the internal pressure to hydrostatic testing requirements (see API RP 1110; API RP 1111; ASME B31.4-2002; ASME B 31.8-2003; approximately 1.25×m. o. p. of the pipeline).
In addition, the platform may have a data transmitting or collecting interface. Examples are data lines connected to pipeline water pressure and/or temperature devices; and electronic devices for measuring whether stabs of lines for water flow or data are connected securely, and feedback on the status of platform equipment. Flow rates or volume of water pumped may also be measured and the data transmitted through the umbilical to the vessel. Pigs passed through the pipeline during a pigging commissioning method may be detected or measured, either the launching of a pig into the pipeline from a pig launcher or the recovery of a pig from the pipeline into a pig receiver. Smart pigs or other electronics may provide information of a pig as it flows through the pipeline, and acoustic data may be transmitted by the pig, received by the platform, and relayed to the surface via the umbilical to the platform.
Advantages of the UPP are:
Specific embodiments of the present invention are set forth in the drawings and description hereinafter.
Referring now to
The ROV has its own umbilical 42 which is shown connected to a tether management system (TMS) 44. The ROV's gripper 46 is manipulated to open and shut valves on the UPP's pumps to perform the operational procedures for the commissioning method.
Referring now to
In the present embodiment, the UPP and ROV are independently launched and recovered. This reduces the lifting weight requirement of the equipment on the vessel 16. Referring now to
Another embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
The present application claims the benefit of 35 U.S.C. 111(b) provisional Application Ser. No. 60/930,611 filed May 17, 2007, and entitled “Universal Pumping Platform”. A related application of James B. Loeb, filed concurrently with this application, titled “Geometric Universal Pump Platform” is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3466001 | Nelson | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3520358 | Brooks et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
| 3640299 | Nelson | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3691493 | Boysen et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3708990 | Crooke | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3777499 | Matthews, Jr. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3788084 | Matthew, Jr. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3961493 | Nolan, Jr. et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 4155669 | Rochelle | May 1979 | A |
| 4165571 | Chang et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4229121 | Brown | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4234268 | Scodino | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4332277 | Adkins et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4344319 | Hancock et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4445804 | Abdallah et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4463597 | Pierce et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4615571 | Swank | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4906136 | Norbom et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 5044827 | Gray et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5192167 | da Silva et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5267616 | Silva et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5273376 | Ritter, Jr. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5348451 | Mohn | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5421674 | Maloberti et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5842816 | Cunningham | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5883303 | Bliss et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5927901 | Graves | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5975803 | Mackinnon | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6022421 | Bath et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6109829 | Cruickshank | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6145223 | Flesen | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6170493 | Sivacoe | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171025 | Langner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6200068 | Bath et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6234717 | Corbetta | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6257162 | Watt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6290431 | Exley et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6336238 | Tarlton | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6435279 | Howe et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6454492 | Dean et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6503021 | Corbetta | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6539778 | Tucker et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6549857 | Fierro et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6596089 | Smith et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6763889 | Rytlewski et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6840088 | Tucker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 7011152 | Soelvik | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7093661 | Olsen | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7281880 | Tucker et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7708839 | Yemington | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7765725 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 20020040782 | Rytlewski et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040872 | Bogoev et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059687 | Smith et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059887 | Marshall et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129641 | Tucker et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030010094 | Tucker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030075335 | Amin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145991 | Olsen | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154769 | Tucker et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170077 | Herd et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20070003371 | Yemington | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20080282777 | Loeb | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090288836 | Goodall et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100085064 | Loeb et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100089126 | Sweeney | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2195739 | Apr 1998 | GB |
| 2421530 | Jun 2006 | GB |
| 226185 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| 02084160 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 02088658 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080282776 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60930611 | May 2007 | US |