1. Field of Invention
This invention generally relates to a method and apparatus for securely storing and disseminating information regarding individuals and, more particularly, to a computer system for authenticating identity or verifying the identity of individuals and other entities seeking access to certain privileges and for selectively granting privileges and providing other services in response to such identifications/verifications.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Dissemination of information regarding various entities, including individuals, in society is conventionally done in a non-centralized fashion, often requiring specialized knowledge of a likely storage location to access the information. This specialized knowledge may not be available when the information is needed, thus effectively preventing distribution of the information when required. For example, a doctor in an emergency room may desire access to a patient's medical history in determining a course of treatment. If the person is not carrying a complete medical record, which is typically the situation, the medical records may not be available to the doctor. Even if these medical records are available electronically, for example via a computer accessible in the person's regular doctor's office, the records may effectively be unavailable if the person is unconscious or otherwise incapacitated or if restrictions on access to the doctor's records cannot otherwise be overcome. The retrieval of required medical records can be further complicated by the fact that such records can be located at a number of different sites/systems which are not linked. For example, the patient's primary care physician may not have records from a specialist treating the patient, and none of these physicians may have dental records. Similar problems arise in other environments where relevant data may be scattered and/or otherwise difficult to access.
Identification of a person from other persons within a society and verification of a person as being who he says he is are extremely important for many reasons. For example, determination/verification of a person's identity will typically dictate extension of credit, granting access to information, allowing entry to a restricted area, or the granting of numerous other privileges.
Most people carry multiple forms of identification. For example, a typical person may carry an identification card issued by a federal, state, or local governmental entity, an identification card issued by a university or place of employment, one or more credit cards that serve to identify the person as a holder of a credit card account, one or more bank cards that serve to identify the person as holder of a bank account, medical information cards identifying the person as a member of, for example, a health maintenance organization or as a person holding an insurance policy from a specified insurance company, keys that identify the person as owner of an automobile, house, etc., and numerous other identification cards that may be used for specialized purposes, such as identifying the person as a member of a health club, a library, or a professional organization.
To enable the person to function effectively in society, the person must typically have one or more of these identification devices with them if they wish to undertake an associated activity. For example, a person is not allowed to drive a car or purchase alcohol without a governmentally issued driver's license. Likewise, although cash may be used to purchase goods and/or services, the person will typically not be able to purchase goods and/or services with a credit card if the person is not physically carrying the credit card. Similarly, most hospitals and other medical facilities will require proof of insurance before rendering medical attention. Carrying these multifarious identification devices can become onerous. Additionally, if one or more of the identification devices is lost, stolen or forgotten, it can be inconvenient, making it difficult to obtain goods or services requiring the missing identification.
There are also times when the individual may wish to be identified or at least verified without providing personal information. For example, a person may wish to purchase goods and/or services without publicly providing his/her credit card information for fear that the credit card information be may be stolen and used fraudulently. Likewise, the person may wish to purchase goods or order goods to be delivered to an address without revealing the address to the vendor. Unfortunately, conventional identification devices require that at least some personal information be transmitted to complete a transaction.
There are other related problems. For example, when there is a need to locate a person or other entity where only limited biographical data is known, this can be difficult since relevant information is seldom available from a single database. Another potential problem is the forwarding of mail, packages, telephone calls/messages, e-mails and other items where a party is in a situation where they are changing location frequently and/or where the person does not want such information to be generally available for security or other reasons. A simple, yet secure, way of dealing with such issues does not currently exist.
Another potential problem is filling in forms, particularly for an individual who frequently has to complete the same or similar form. Such forms can for example be medical forms when visiting a doctor or entering a hospital, immigration forms on entering the country, employment forms, college entry forms, etc. It would be desirable if such forms could be completed once and be available for future use, and it would be even better if the information for each such form could be automatically drawn from an existing database to complete the form. There is also a frequent requirement to periodically update information in a form, for example financial information for a line of credit. It would be desirable if such updates could be automatically performed from data in a general database.
Still another potential problem is that a person may be forced to make requests on a database, for example financial requests, under duress. It would be desirable if the person could easily and undetectably signal such duress when making the request and the receiving system be able to act appropriately to assist and protect the individual.
Systems capable of effectively performing all of these functions do not currently exist.
There is thus a need for an identification system that will enable a person to be identified or verified (“identification” sometimes being used hereinafter to mean either identified or verified) and/or authenticated without necessitating the provision of any personal information. Likewise, there is a need for an identification system that will enable a person to be identified universally without requiring the person to carry multiple forms of identification.
Accordingly, this invention relates, in one embodiment, to an information system that may be used as a universal identification system and/or used to selectively provide personal, financial or other information about a person to authorized users. Transactions to and from the database may take place using a public key/private key security system to enable users of the system and the system itself to encrypt transaction information during the transactions. Additionally, the private key/public key security system may be used to allow users to validate their identity and/or sign instructions being sent to a universal secure registry (USR) system of the type to which this invention relates. For example, in one embodiment, a smart card such as the SecurID™ card from RSI Security, Inc. may be provided with the user's private key and the USR system's public key to enable the card to encrypt messages being sent to the USR system and to decrypt messages from the USR system 10.
This USR system or database may be used to identify the person in many situations, and thus may take the place of multiple conventional forms of identification. Additionally, the USR system may enable the user's identity to be confirmed or verified without providing any identifying information about the person to the entity requiring identification. This can be advantageous where the person suspects that providing identifying information may subject the identifying information to usurpation.
Enabling anonymous identification facilitates multiple new forms of transactions. For example, enabling anonymous identification enables the identified person to be telephoned by or receive e-mails from other persons without providing the other person with a telephone number or e-mail address, and will permit this to be accomplished even where there are frequent changes in the person's location. Similarly, enabling anonymous identification will enable the person to receive mail, other delivered parcels and other items without providing the recipient's address information to the sender. By restricting access to particular classes of persons/entities, the person can effectively prevent receipt of junk mail, other unsolicited mail, telemarketing calls and the like.
In a financial context, providing anonymous identification of a person enables the person to purchase goods and/or services from a merchant without ever transmitting to the merchant information, such as the person's credit card number, or even the person's name, that could be intercepted and/or usurped and used in subsequent or additional unauthorized transactions or for other undesired purposes. Enabling anonymous identification may be particularly advantageous in an unsecured environment, such as the Internet, where it has been found to be relatively trivial to intercept such credit card information.
In a medical context, the USR system, in addition to enabling a person seeking medical treatment to identify themselves, may be configured to provide insurance data, medical history data, and other appropriate medical information to a medical provider, once that medical provider has been established as an authorized recipient. The USR system may also contain links to other databases containing portions of the patient's medical records, for example x-rays, MRI pictures, dental records, glasses, prescriptions, etc.
Access to the USR system may be by smart card, such as a SecurID™ card, or any other secure access device. The technology enabling the USR system may be physically embodied as a separate identification device such as a smart ID card, or may be incorporated into another electronic device, such as a cell phone, pager, wrist watch, computer, personal digital assistant such as a Palm Pilot™, key fob, or other commonly available electronic device. The identity of the user possessing the identifying device may be verified at the point of use via any combination of a memorized PIN number or code, biometric identification such as a fingerprint, voice print, signature, iris or facial scan, or DNA analysis, or any other method of identifying the person possessing the device. If desired, the identifying device may also be provided with a picture of the person authorized to use the device to enhance security.
The USR system may be useful for numerous other identification purposes. For example, the USR anonymous identification may serve as a library card, a phone card, a health club card, a professional association membership card, a parking access card, a key for access to one's home, office, car, etc. or any one of a host of similar identification/verification and/or access functions. Additionally, equipment code information may be stored in the USR system and distributed under the user's control and at the user's discretion, to maintain personal property or public property in an operative state.
This invention is pointed out with particularity in the appended claims. The above and further advantages of this invention may be better understood by referring to the following description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every thawing. In the drawings:
This invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having,” “containing”, “involving”, and variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
In one embodiment, an information system is formed as a computer program running on a computer or group of computers configured to provide a universal secure registry (USR) system. The computer, in this instance, may be configured to run autonomously (without the intervention of a human operator), or may require intervention or approval for all, a selected subset, or particular classes of transactions. The invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, and may take on many different forms depending on the particular requirements of the information system, the type of information being exchanged, and the type of computer equipment employed. An information system according to this invention, may optionally, but need not necessarily, perform functions additional to those described herein, and the invention is not limited to a computer system performing solely the described functions.
In the embodiment shown in
The computer system may be a general purpose computer system which is programmable using a computer programming language, such as C, C++, Java, or other language, such as a scripting language or even assembly language. The computer system may also be specially programmed, special purpose hardware, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or a hybrid system including both special purpose components and programmed general purpose components.
In a general purpose computer system, the processor is typically a commercially available microprocessor, such as Pentium series processor available from Intel, or other similar commercially available device. Such a microprocessor executes a program called an operating system, such as UNIX, Linux, Windows NT, Windows 95, 98, or 2000, or any other commercially available operating system, which controls the execution of other computer programs and provides scheduling, debugging, input/output control, accounting, compilation, storage assignment, data management, memory management, communication control and related services, and many other functions. The processor and operating system defines a computer platform for which application programs in high-level programming languages are written.
The database 24 may be any kind of database, including a relational database, object-oriented database, unstructured database, or other database. Example relational databases include Oracle 81 from Oracle Corporation of Redwood City, Calif.; Informix Dynamic Server from Informix Software, Inc. of Menlo Park, Calif.; DB2 from International Business Machines of Armonk, N.Y.; and Access from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash. An example object-oriented database is ObjectStore from Object Design of Burlington, Mass. An example of an unstructured database is Notes from the Lotus Corporation, of Cambridge, Mass. A database also may be constructed using a flat file system, for example by using files with character-delimited fields, such as in early versions of dBASE, now known as Visual dBASE from Inprise Corp. of Scotts Valley, Calif., formerly Borland International Corp.
The main unit 12 may optionally include or be connected to an user interface 26 containing, for example, one or more input and output devices to enable an operator to interface with the USR system 10. Illustrative input devices include a keyboard, keypad, track ball, mouse, pen and tablet, communication device, and data input devices such as voice and other audio and video capture devices. Illustrative output devices include cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, liquid crystal displays (LCD) and other video output devices, printers, communication devices such as modems, storage devices such as a disk or tape, and audio or video output devices. Optionally, the user interface 26 may be omitted, in which case the operator may communicate with the USR system 10 in a networked fashion via the communication port 14. It should be understood that the invention is not limited to any particular manner of interfacing an operator with the USR system.
It also should be understood that the invention is not limited to a particular computer platform, particular processor, or particular high-level programming language. Additionally, the computer system may be a multiprocessor computer system or may include multiple computers connected over a computer network. It further should be understood that each module or step shown in the accompanying figures and the substeps or subparts shown in the remaining figures may correspond to separate modules of a computer program, or may be separate computer programs. Such modules may be operable on separate computers. The data produced by these components may be stored in a memory system or transmitted between computer systems.
Such a system may be implemented in software, hardware, or firmware, or any combination thereof. The various elements of the information system disclosed herein, either individually or in combination, may be implemented as a computer program product, such as USR software 18, tangibly embodied in a machine-readable storage device for execution by the computer processor 16. Various steps of the process may be performed by the computer processor 16 executing the program 18 tangibly embodied on a computer-readable medium to perform functions by operating on input and generating output. Computer programming languages suitable for implementing such a system include procedural programming languages, object-oriented programming languages, and combinations of the two.
As shown in
In one embodiment, the USR system 10 or USR database 24 may be able to authenticate its identity to a user or other entity accessing the system by providing an appropriate code which may be displayed on the user's smart card, for example a SecurID™ card or its equivalent, or other code generator, for example a single use code generator, being employed by the user. A comparison by the user or the code generator between the provided number and an expected number can validate, to the user (or other entity) or the code generator, that communication is with the database and not an imposter.
The database 24 shown in
As shown in
If the database information is split between multiple databases, each database will typically include at least the validation and access information to enable the USR software to correlate a validation attempt with a verified validation, and to enable the USR software to determine access privileges to the requested data. Alternatively, databases may be linked to permit information not in a main USR database to be retrieved, with validation/identification for all databases accessed being done at the USR system.
In
In one embodiment, the user of the database will carry a SecurID™ card available from RSA Security, formerly Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc., of Cambridge, Mass. Use of this card enables secure access to the USR database without requiring the user to transmit any personal information. Specifically, to access the USR database, the card retrieves a secret user code and/or time varying value from memory and obtains from the user a secret personal identification code. The card mathematically combines these three numbers using a predetermined algorithm to generate a one-time nonpredictable code which is transmitted to the computer system 10. The computer system, specifically USR software 18, utilizes the received one-time nonpredictable code to determine if the user is authorized access to the USR database and grants access to the USR database if the user is determined to be authorized. The verification information 32 in the database entry in the embodiment of the invention illustrated in
Alternative types of identification cards or tokens may likewise be used. For example, other smart cards may be used which generate non-predictable single use codes, which may or may not be time varying, or other access code generators may be used. An algorithm generating such non-predictable codes may also be programmed onto a processor on a smart card or other computing device, such as a cell phone, pager, ID badge, wrist watch, computer, personal digital assistant, key fob, or other commonly available electronic device. For convenience, the term “electronic ID device” will be used generically to refer to any type of electronic device that may be used to obtain access to the USR database.
Likewise, various types of biometric information may be stored in the verification area of the database entry to enable the identity of the user possessing the identifying device to be verified at the point of use. Examples of the type of biometric information that may be used in this situation includes a personal identification number (PIN), fingerprint, voice print, signature, iris or facial scan, or DNA analysis. If desired, the verifying section of the database may contain a picture to be transmitted back to the person seeking to validate the device to ensure the person using the device is the correct person. Optionally, the identifying device itself may also be provided with a picture of the person authorized to use the card to provide a facial confirmation of the person's right to use the card.
In
As shown in
The algorithms comprising the USR software 18 may be used to implement, in one exemplary embodiment, a USR system configured to enable selected information to be disseminated to selected individuals in a secure and dynamic fashion. This information may be used for numerous purposes, several of which are set forth below and discussed in greater detail in connection with
For example, the USR system may be used to identify the person, enable the person to be contacted by telephone or mail anonymously, enable the person to be contacted by telephone or by mail without revealing the person's telephone number or present location, enable the person to purchase items over the Internet or in a store without revealing to the merchant any personal identification information or credit card information, enable the person to complete a job application without completing a job application form, enable the police to discern the person's identity and any outstanding warrants on the individual, and numerous other uses. The invention is not limited to these several enumerated uses, but rather extends to any use of the USR database. The methods of using the USR database 24 will now be discussed in connection with
After the validation process (500), the USR software 18 determines if the person has rights to enter data into the system (502). This step enables the system to charge persons for maintaining information in the USR database 24. For example, the USR software 18 may poll a database of current accounts or a database of accounts that are currently in default to determine if the person has paid the access fee to enter data into the database. A similar account status inquiry process may be performed by the USR software 18 in connection with each of the other methods set forth in
If the person is authorized, the USR software 18 then enables the person to enter basic personal data into the USR database 24 (504). Optionally, personal data may be one class of data the USR software 18 allows the person to enter into the USR database 18 regardless of account status, i.e., for free.
The USR software 18 will then check to see if the person has additional rights to enter additional data (506), such as data to be entered into one of the other categories of data in
If the USR software 18 determines that the person has the right to enter additional data into the USR database 24, the person is prompted through the use of appropriate prompts, provided with forms, and otherwise enabled to enter advanced personal data into the USR database 24 (508). For each type of data entered, the person is asked to specify the type of access restrictions and/or whom should be allowed to access the advanced personal data (510). When the person has completed entering data into the database, the process returns (512) and commits the data to the database.
In the situation where only one person has access to enter and/or modify data for a given person in the database, there should be no conflict with committing data to the database. If, however, multiple people have access to a given account to modify data, the database may perform an integrity check to ensure the absence of conflict in the data before committing the new data to the database.
Enabling access to the information in the database will be explained in greater detail in connection with
If information beyond that specified in the basic personal information area is requested, the USR software 18 queries whether the requestor has the right to access the type of requested data (602). The process of determining the requestor's rights (602) typically involves validating the requestor's identity and correlating the identity, the requested information and the access information 34 provided by the person to the USR database during the training process described above with respect to
If the USR software 18 determines that the requestor has rights to access the type of requested data (604), the USR software 18 instructs the USR database 24 to enable access to the type of requested data (606). The actual step of enabling access to the type of requested data may involve multiple steps of formulating a database query, querying the USR database 24, retrieving the results, assembling the results into a user friendly or user readable format, and transmitting the information to the user.
If the USR software 18 determines that the requestor does not have the appropriate rights to access the type of requested data (604), the USR software 18 checks to see if the person is participating in the transaction (608). Checking to see if the person is participating in the transaction enables the user to authorize access to the requested data in real time. For example, a person may wish to participate in a transaction to give a potential employer one-time access to job application information 44 (see
If the person is participating in the transaction (608), however, the USR software 18 validates the person's identity (612) and enables the person to change access rights to the data (614). If the USR software 18 is not able to validate the person's identity, the USR software 18 refuses to allow the person to update the database, notifies the person and/or requestor of this determination, and returns (610).
It is also possible that a person may be required to grant access to certain data, for example financial data such as account numbers, under duress. The system may provide the person with the ability to safely signal this when accessing the system by using a selected access code or by making a known modification to the access code provided by the electronic ID device. On receiving such code, the system would take appropriate steps to protect the person, including for example alerting the police, tracking the person's location to the extent possible, providing traceable data, and the like.
Once the person has had the opportunity to change access rights to the data (614), the USR software 18 again checks to see if the requestor has rights to access the type of requested data (616). Although step 616 may seem redundant, given the fact that the person is participating in the transaction and has just previously changed access rights to the database to enable the requestor to have access to the data, step 616 is actually useful at preventing a different type of fraud. Specifically, the requestor may not be forthright with the person regarding the type of information they are requesting. If step 616 were omitted, the USR software 18 may inadvertently allow access to an unauthorized type of information in the situation where the requestor has surreptitiously requested multiple types of data.
If the USR software 18 determines that the requestor has rights to the type of data requested (616), it causes the USR database to enable access to the type of requested data (606). Otherwise, it notifies the requestor of the decision to deny access to the requested data and returns (610).
Various applications of the USR database 24 and USR software 18 will now be discussed in connection with
As shown in
Another embodiment of a system for facilitating purchase of goods or services without providing financial information to the merchant is set forth in
The credit card company then processes the transaction in a standard fashion, such as by checking the credit worthiness of the person, declining the card or debiting the user's account and transferring money to the merchant's account (810). The credit card company then notifies the USR system 10 the result of the transaction (812) and the USR software 18 in turn notifies the merchant of the result of the transaction (814).
In this embodiment, like the embodiment of
In either situation, the user enters a secret code into the electronic ID card and presents the resulting code to the merchant along with the check (902). The merchant transmits to the USR software 18 (1) the code from the electronic ID card, (2) the store number, and (3) the amount of the purchase (904). Where the check is an anonymous check, the merchant also transmits to the USR software 18 the check number.
The USR software 18 then determines if the code from the electronic ID is valid (906), and if valid accesses the user's bank information and transmits to the bank: (1) the user's bank account number, (2) the store number, and (3) the amount of the purchase (908). Optionally, the USR software 18 may additionally inform the bank of the check number.
The bank polls its own database to determine if there are sufficient funds in the user's account (910) and notifies the USR software 18 of the result (912). The USR software 18 then, in turn, notifies the merchant of the result of the verification (914).
This check verification system may take place over an unsecured connection between the merchant and the USR system 10 since the user's bank account information is not sent over the connection between the merchant and the USR system 10. Moreover, where an anonymous check is used, the merchant is not even provided with the person's name or account information in written form. This provides additional security against unauthorized persons writing subsequent checks.
The check verification system may be conducted over a telephone network, such as by having the merchant call a toll free number, or over a network connection such as over the Internet.
As shown in
In either event, the USR software 18 determines if the code is valid (1004) and, if valid, accesses the user's credit card information from the USR database 24 (1006). The USR software 18 then contacts the user's credit card company, as described above in connection with
If the user's credit is declined, the USR software 18 notifies the on-line merchant and the transaction is terminated (1012). If the user's credit is honored, the USR software 18 polls the USR database 24 for the user's address and/or address code (1014). Address codes are discussed below in greater detail with reference to
In
The user also provides address information to the address information area 38 of the user's entry in the USR database 24 (1102). Access to the address information 38 is restricted by a rule or other appropriate entry in the access information 34 of the user's entry to only permit mail, parcel or other material delivery services, such as the US mail, UPS and Fed Ex to access the address information.
When someone wishes to have a parcel or other items delivered to the user, the sender retrieves the user's address code from the USR database 24 or otherwise receives the address code from the user, and prints the address code on the parcel (1104).
The delivery service accesses the USR software 18, validates its identity, and queries the USR database 24 for address information corresponding to the address code (1106). The USR database 24 retrieves the appropriate address data and provides the address information to the delivery service. The delivery service then either prints out an address label, prints a machine readable bar code to be attached to the package, or correlates an entry in a delivery database between the address code and the user address (1110). The delivery service then uses this retrieved information to deliver the package to the user while never supplying the merchant with the user's permanent or temporary address. A user may also assure that mail, parcels, etc. are delivered to a current location by providing only a single notice to the USR system, regardless of how frequently the person moves. The person can also automatically provide for address changes where the person moves according to a known schedule. Thus, deliveries to be made on a weekday could be directed to one address and deliveries on a weekend to another address; or deliveries during winter months to one address and during summer months to a different address.
The person wishing to telephone the user of the USR system 10 calls a telephone number and enters the telephone code of the user (1204). The USR software 18, optionally, may require the person to identify themselves to see if they are authorized to call the user. Assuming that the person is authorized to call the person, or if no authorization check is performed, the USR connects the person to the telephone number in the USR database 24 without providing the person with the telephone number.
Enabling the user to specify the telephone number may be advantageous for many reasons. First, the user may frequently be switching between telephone coverage areas and may wish to be reachable at all times. Simply by instructing the USR database 24 to connect incoming telephone calls to one of a myriad of numbers will facilitate connecting the incoming calls to, for example, the user's cell phone, work phone, pager, car phone or home phone, without necessitating the user to provide all these numbers to the caller. A similar system may be implemented for facsimile transmissions, e-mails or other communications.
The user also may have predefined rules to enable telephone calls to follow a set pattern. For example, the user may desire to receive telephone calls only from family members during the night time at home, may wish to have all incoming calls routed to a car phone during commuting hours, and may wish to have all incoming calls routed to a cell phone during lunch. These time dependent rules may and/or caller specific rules may be entered into the USR database to specify accessibility and connectivity of incoming telephone calls.
The publicly available address code and telephone code and any other codes may be the same, or may be different, there being some advantages to having a single code usable for all such applications for each person on the system. The codes could be accessible through a variety of media including telephone and the internet. Where two or more people on the system have the same name, which will frequently be the case, additional publicly available biographical data may be provided with the name to assure that the right code is selected. The system may similarly be used to provide public keys for use in a public key/private key encryption system, to provide other public codes for an individual or to provide other public information. Access to such information would typically be unrestricted.
Where the system is used to provide public keys, the public code used to obtain the key, or possibly the public key itself, may be used as above to obtain the e-mail address, telephone number or the like for the person to whom the message is being sent, and the USR system may also be used to perform the encryption. When the recipient receives the message, he deencrypts it using the recipient's private key in standard fashion, including deencrypting the name of the sender. However, this does not necessarily verify the sender and such verification may be desirable for important messages, particularly ones involving large financial transactions. The USR system may accomplish such verification by also storing private keys for people in the system. The sender first authenticates himself to the system, and the system then adds a second signature to the message which is encrypted with the sender's private key. The receiving party deencrypts this signature with the sender's public key. Since the system only sends such signatures for authenticated users, the message is thus verified.
Specifically, in the embodiment illustrated in
A specific embodiment of this identification validation procedure is illustrated in
The above assumes the user is able to provide an ID code when the information is required. However, in for example an emergency room situation, the user may not be in a position to provide the ID code, but would still want medical records provided. The release authorization for certain portions of the user's database could therefore specify that the information be released to certain class or classes of individuals and the USR system would release such information to individuals or organizations based only on status code. Thus, the status code of an emergency room could alone trigger release of medical data.
As can be seen from the above, many of the users of the USR system are organizations or agencies such as carriers (post office, UPS, FedEX), communication companies, law enforcement organizations, hospitals and other medical facilities and the like. Each of these organizations can be provided with specialized software either on a disc or other suitable media or electronically, for example over the internet, which performs a number of functions, for example automatically generating status codes for data access requests, controlling information received, and formatting data received in response to a request in a desired way. This can result in an access request from such organization for a given user causing all data on the user required to complete the form being retrieved and presented to the organization in the format of their form. A user may also authorize an organization for which a form has been completed using the USR system to receive updates, either in response to a request from the organization or at selected intervals, for example once a year, so as to maintain information in the forms current. Since the user will be providing information to the system on a regular basis, this is a relatively easy and painless way for the user to maintain current information with many organizations the user deals with.
Another potential use of the system is to permit a person to be located where only limited biographical information on the person is known. Users of the USR system wishing to participate in this feature could be cued to provide non-confidential biographical data when they come on the system or at any time thereafter when they decide to participate. They can also indicate whether they wish their name given out in response to such an inquiry or to merely be alerted to an inquiry which might involve them and information on the requester. A person seeking to find another person or group of people can input appropriate biographical data, for example members of 1975 Harvard University hockey team, or information of a person's last known address plus school information, etc. The system will then provide a list of persons who meet the listed criteria from which the person making the inquiry can hopefully find the person they are looking for.
In the above application and others, when a person is located, the person may request that only the person's address code or general access code (i.e. a single code which is used to get current address, telephone, e-mail, etc. information) be provided when the person is located. This can further protect the individual from undesired contacts.
The USR system 10 may be advantageously employed to automatically provide the secured property with the necessary codes at appropriate intervals, unless instructed by the user of the USR system 10 to cease doing so. Alternatively, the USR system 10 may require participation by the user prior to sending out the activation codes.
In this embodiment, the user may provide to the USR system 10, information indicative of the codes to be transmitted, timing information, and automation information—i.e., whether the codes should be sent automatically or should require user intervention. Optionally, where the user opts to require user intervention, the USR system 10 may notify the user of the upcoming deadline via e-mail or another method.
This system may be useful to secure sensitive equipment other than personal equipment as well, such as military equipment, public equipment, school equipment and any other equipment that is subject to theft.
It should be understood that various changes and modifications of the embodiments shown in the drawings and described in the specification may be made within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings be interpreted in an illustrative and not in a limiting sense. The invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and the equivalents thereto.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 as a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/768,729, filed on Jun. 26, 2007 and issued on Oct. 7, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,856,539, which is continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/810,703, filed on Mar. 16, 2001 and issued on Jun. 26, 2007 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,237,117. Each of the above-identified applications is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4720860 | Weiss | Jan 1988 | A |
4856062 | Weiss | Aug 1989 | A |
4885778 | Weiss | Dec 1989 | A |
4998279 | Weiss | Mar 1991 | A |
5023908 | Weiss | Jun 1991 | A |
5058161 | Weiss | Oct 1991 | A |
5097505 | Weiss | Mar 1992 | A |
5168520 | Weiss | Dec 1992 | A |
5237614 | Weiss | Aug 1993 | A |
5280527 | Gullman et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5361062 | Weiss et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367572 | Weiss | Nov 1994 | A |
5398285 | Borgelt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5457747 | Drexler et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5479512 | Weiss | Dec 1995 | A |
5485519 | Weiss | Jan 1996 | A |
5615277 | Hoffman | Mar 1997 | A |
5657388 | Weiss | Aug 1997 | A |
5664109 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5813006 | Polnerow et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5870723 | Pare, Jr. et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5915023 | Bernstein | Jun 1999 | A |
5930767 | Reber et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5971272 | Hsiao | Oct 1999 | A |
6000832 | Franklin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016476 | Maes et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6073106 | Rozen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088450 | Davis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6130621 | Weiss | Oct 2000 | A |
6163771 | Walker et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6202055 | Houvener et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6253202 | Gilmour | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253203 | O'Flaherty et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260039 | Schneck et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6308203 | Itabashi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309342 | Blazey et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6393421 | Paglin | May 2002 | B1 |
6453301 | Niwa | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6498861 | Hamid et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516315 | Gupta | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6546005 | Berkley et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6581059 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6640211 | Holden | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658400 | Perell et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678821 | Waugh et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6819219 | Bolle et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820204 | Desai et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6845448 | Chaganti et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6941271 | Soong | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950521 | Marcovici et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950939 | Tobin | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7007298 | Shinzaki et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7237117 | Weiss | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249112 | Berardi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7278026 | McGowan | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7412604 | Doyle | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7489781 | Klassen et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502459 | Moseley | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7548981 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7552333 | Wheeler et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552467 | Lindsay | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571139 | Giordano | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7597250 | Finn | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7657639 | Hinton | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7705732 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742967 | Keresman, III et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7766223 | Mello et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7805372 | Weiss | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809651 | Weiss | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7865448 | Pizarro | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8001055 | Weiss | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8079079 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8219495 | Niwa | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234220 | Weiss | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8271397 | Weiss | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8380637 | Levovitz | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8423466 | Lanc | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433919 | Giobbi et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8538881 | Weiss | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8577813 | Weiss | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594632 | Azizi et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8613052 | Weiss | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8751801 | Harris et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8814046 | Wallner | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8838502 | Niwa | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8856539 | Weiss | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9100826 | Weiss | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9531696 | Weiss | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20010029485 | Brody et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032100 | Mahmud et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044900 | Uchida | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020046061 | Wright et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020090930 | Fujiwara et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020176610 | Okazaki et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178364 | Weiss | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184500 | Maritzen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184538 | Sugimura et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188574 | Niwa | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194499 | Audebert et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014372 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028481 | Flitcroft et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037233 | Pearson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046540 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061171 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074568 | Kinsella et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084332 | Krasinski et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030085808 | Goldberg | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115378 | Zondervan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115490 | Russo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123713 | Geng | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030129965 | Siegel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139984 | Seigel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163710 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030219121 | van Someren | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226017 | Palekar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030226041 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229637 | Baxter et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040014423 | Croome et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017934 | Kocher | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019564 | Goldthwaite et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034771 | Edgett et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059923 | ShamRao | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083170 | Bam et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088369 | Yeager et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107170 | Labrou et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111625 | Duffy et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117215 | Marchosky | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117302 | Weichert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131185 | Kakumer | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133787 | Doughty et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151351 | Ito | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181695 | Walker | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188519 | Cassone | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230536 | Fung et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236632 | Maritzen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236699 | Beenau et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050001711 | Doughty et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050035847 | Bonalle et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039027 | Shapiro | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071231 | Beenau et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097362 | Winget et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113070 | Okabe | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130659 | Grech et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187843 | Lapsley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187873 | Labrou et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210270 | Rohatgi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235148 | Scheidt et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238147 | Carro | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238208 | Sim | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050268107 | Harris et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000900 | Fernandes et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060016884 | Block et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060087999 | Gustave et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104486 | Le Saint et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117175 | Miura et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122939 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135127 | Aarnio et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060165060 | Dua | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060180660 | Gray | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191995 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205388 | Semple et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206724 | Schaufele et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060256961 | Brainard et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276226 | Jiang | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005988 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016088 | Grant et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070040017 | Kozlay | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070079136 | Vishik et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118758 | Takahashi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124597 | Bedingfield | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124697 | Dongelmans | May 2007 | A1 |
20070131759 | Cox et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136796 | Sanchez et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140145 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156436 | Fisher et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070186105 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186115 | Gao et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197261 | Humbel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198436 | Weiss | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070245152 | Pizano et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256120 | Shatzkamer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265984 | Santhana | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274242 | Lamacraft et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288758 | Weiss | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289000 | Weiss | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005576 | Weiss | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021997 | Hinton | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040274 | Uzo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080127311 | Yasaki et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080212848 | Doyle | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080275819 | Rifai | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080289030 | Poplett | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090083544 | Scholnick et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097661 | Orsini et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090144814 | Sacco | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175507 | Schaffner | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179743 | Amtmann | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090203355 | Clark | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090247186 | Ji et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287921 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292641 | Weiss | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090298514 | Ullah | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000455 | Harper | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100046443 | Jia et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100095364 | Norgaard et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100241570 | Keresman, III et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110258120 | Weiss | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110283337 | Schatzmayr | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120004015 | Le Thierry D'Ennequin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120037479 | Lucchi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056681 | Lee | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120130904 | Weiss | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150750 | Law et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120197808 | Niwa | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230555 | Miura et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240195 | Weiss | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130024374 | Weiss | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130307670 | Ramaci | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318581 | Counterman | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140096216 | Weiss | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140101049 | Fernandes et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140149295 | Weiss | May 2014 | A1 |
20140196118 | Weiss | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150046340 | Dimmick | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20160155121 | Weiss | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0986209 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1028401 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1081632 | Mar 2001 | EP |
2382006 | May 2003 | GB |
1992007436 | Apr 1992 | WO |
1996036934 | Nov 1996 | WO |
0014648 | Mar 2000 | WO |
200106699 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0113275 | Feb 2001 | WO |
2001024123 | Apr 2001 | WO |
200163537 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2002014985 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2004051585 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2005001751 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2010000455 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2012037479 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/814,740, Not Yet Published, filed Jul. 31, 2015, Kenneth P. Weiss et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,126, 2014/0149295, filed Nov. 4, 2013, Kenneth P. Weiss et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/107,969, 2014/0196118, filed Dec. 16, 2013, Kenneth P. Weiss et al. |
“Biometrics: Who's Watching You?”, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Sep. 2003, all pages, http://www.eff.org/wp/biometrics-whos-watching-you. |
“Bluetooth Technology FAQ”, Mobileinfo.com, Jan. 21, 2001, all pages, http://www.web.archive.org/web/200101211551/http://www.mobileinfo.com/Bluetooth/FAQ.htm. |
“FIPS PUB 46-3”, National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST), Oct. 25, 1999, all pages. |
“Information Security: Challenges in using biometrics”, Sep. 9, 2003, all pages, <http://www.gao.gov/news.items/d031137t.pdf>. |
“PGP: An introduction to cryptography”, 2000, all pages. |
“Single Sign on Authentication”, Authentication World, Mar. 13, 2007, all pages, retrieved Jul. 9, 2010 via Wayback Machine, <http://web.archive.org/web/20070313200434/http://www.authenticationworld.com/Single-Sign-On-Authentication/>. |
Hungtington, “101 Things to know about single sign on”, Authentication World, 2006, all pages, <http://www.authenticationworld.com/Single-Sign-On-Authentication/101ThingsToKnowAboutSingleSignOn.pdf>. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051966, 49 pages. |
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/004646 dated Nov. 27, 2007. |
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/070701 dated Mar. 11, 2008. |
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/035282 dated Jul. 10, 2009. |
Kessler, “An overview of cryptography”, Aug. 22, 2002, all pages, retrieved via Wayback Machine on Jan. 19, 2010, http://www.garykessler.net/library/crypto.html. |
Pabrai, “Biometrics for PC-user authentication: a primer”, Access Controls & Security Systems, Feb. 1, 2001, all pages, <http://www.securitysolutions.com/mag/securit_biometrics_pcuser_authentication/index.html>. |
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, PKI for Beginners Glossary, http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pki-icp/beginners/glossary-eng.asp. |
Jin et al., Biohashing: two factor authentication featuring fingerprint data and tokenized random number, Pattern Recognition 37 (11), pp. 2245-2255 (2004). |
Bruce Schneier, Applied Cryptography, 2d Ed (1996). |
American Bankers Association, Financial Institution Key Management (Wholesale), ANSI X9.17 (1995). |
Intel Corp, Baca Jim S, Li Hong, Kohlenberg Tobias M, Stanasolovich David and Price Mark H File WIPO Patent Application for Method for Authentication Using Biometric Data for Mobile Device E-Commerce Transactions Jul. 2, 2013. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,100,826 (IPR2018-00810) dated Apr. 3, 2018. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,100,826 (IPR2018-00813) dated Apr. 3, 2018. |
Petition for Covered Business Method Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,530,137 (CBM2018-00022) dated Apr. 3, 2018. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,530,137 (IPR2018-00809) dated Apr. 3, 2018. |
Petition for Covered Business Method Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,813 (CBM2018-00026) dated May 3, 2018. |
Petition for Covered Business Method Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,813 (CBM2018-00025) dated May 3, 2018. |
Petition for Covered Business Method Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,813 (CBM2018-00024) dated May 3, 2018. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,856,539 (IPR2018-00811) dated Apr. 12, 2018. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,856,539 (IPR2018-00812) dated Apr. 12, 2018. |
Petition for Covered Business Method Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,856,539 (CBM2018-00023) dated Apr. 12, 2018. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case IPR2018-00808. |
Webster's New World Dictionary of Computer Terms Eighth Edition, Copyright 2000 (Date Stamped by Library of Congress Mar. 28, 2000). |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary Fourth Edition Copyright 1999. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,530,137 (IPR2018-00808) dated Apr. 4, 2018. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case IPR2018-00809. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case IPR2018-00810. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case IPR2018-00811. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case IPR2018-00812. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case IPR2018-00813. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case CBM2018-00022. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case CBM2018-00023. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case CBM2018-00024. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case CBM2018-00025. |
Declaration of Dr. Victor Shoup in Case CBM2018-00026. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,530,137 (IPR2019-00174) dated Nov. 2, 2018. |
Complaint, Universal Secure Registry LLC v. Apple Inc., Visa Inc., and Visa U.S.A., Inc., No. 17-585-VAC-MPT (D. Del.). |
Niwa, “Method of Using Personal Device with Internal Biometric in Conducting Transactions Over a Network” U.S. Appl. No. 09/510,811. |
Plantiff's Answering Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint in C.A. No. 17-585, filed Sep. 29, 2017. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review in U.S. Pat. No. 9,100,826 (IPR2019-00175) dated Nov. 2, 2018. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review in U.S. Pat. No. 9,100,826 (IPR2019-00176) dated Nov. 2, 2018. |
Petition for Covered Business Method Review in U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,813 (CBM2019-00025) dated Dec. 20, 2018. |
Petition for Covered Business Method Review in U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,813 (CBM2019-00026) dated Dec. 20, 2018. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,856,539 (IPR2019-00727) dated Mar. 11, 2019. |
Declaration of Dr. Justin Douglas Tygar in Case IPR2019-00727. |
Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Doulgas Justin Tygar. |
File History for U.S. Pat. No. 8,856,539. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/186,166. |
Dynamic, Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, Second Edition, 2001. |
Dynamic, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition, 1996. |
Dynamic, Academic Press Dictionary of Science and Technology, 1992. |
Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Eric Cole. |
Declaration of Dr. Eric Cole in Case IPR2018-00067. |
File History for U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,813. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,813 (IPR2018-00067) dated Oct. 16, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150154594 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11768729 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 14508483 | US | |
Parent | 09810703 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 11768729 | US |