The present invention is directed to an industrial hanger. More particularly, the present invention pertains to a universal suspended anchor system.
An industrial hanger generally refers to a device used for securing building services to the primary steelwork of a structure. Industrial hangers are widely used in industrial-type applications. Typically, industrial hangers are used to secure items such as pipes, cable, and conduit (e.g., water and related services, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning piping and conduit and electrical cables) from the steel joists or trusses located overhead in industrial buildings.
Oftentimes, however, industrial hangers are difficult and costly to install. Characteristically, industrial hangers cannot be installed from the floor: an installer must use a ladder or lift to elevate him or herself to the height of the roof trusses and then proceed to bolt or weld previously known industrial hanger systems to the truss. Unfortunately, large equipment such as electrical or heating and ventilation systems can cause obstructions such that elevating to the height of the truss or otherwise installing the industrial hangers poses a significant challenge.
Another challenge confronted by users of known industrial hangers is that many hangers can exert forces unevenly on the sides of the joists from which the hanger is affixed. Often, the industrial hanger does not distribute the weight uniformly on the truss/joist; because some industrial hangers are mounted on one side of a joist, the load is concentrated on one leg or side of a joist than another. This uneven distribution of load on a weight-bearing surface can be problematic.
In addition, known hanger systems often rotate or move and typically have no seismic restraints to reduce rotational and translational movement.
Finally, existing industrial hangers that can be mounted to trusses from the floor require a seller or user to stock extra inventory such as different lengths of rod or other parts to reach different heights for different installations.
Accordingly, there is a need for a universal suspended anchor system. Desirably, such a universal suspended anchor system is easy to install from the floor and provides for uniform distribution of load, as well as seismic restraint. More desirably, such an anchor is readily made and usable, while keeping parts to a minimum, and has a high degree of integrity at reduced cost.
A universal suspended anchor system is configured for attaching to an associated frame, the associated frame having a first vertical wall and a second vertical wall, the first vertical wall having a first bearing surface and the second vertical wall having a second bearing surface, the first and second bearing surfaces adjacent to and aligned with one another defining a gap between the adjacent bearing surfaces.
The universal suspended anchor system is comprised of a T-bracket and a threaded block. The threaded block is welded to the bracket and the bracket and the threaded block define a unit configured to accept or couple with a threaded rod. In one embodiment, the threaded block is a square threaded block and is welded to a T-bracket, with the threaded block welded to the bracket on either a tabbed side or a flat side of the T-bracket. The threaded block is threaded internally to accept a mating threaded rod. The T-bracket has tabs on its lateral aspects, configured to engage or rest on bearing surfaces of the frame, minimizing rotational movement of the anchor system.
Desirably, the anchor system is easy to install from below, providing for uniform distribution of load and rotational restraint while resting on bearing surfaces, in addition to providing for seismic restraint and reducing translational movement. More desirably, the anchor is readily made and usable, while keeping parts to a minimum, and has a high degree of integrity at reduced cost.
The benefits and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art after reviewing the following detailed description and accompanying drawings, wherein:
While the present invention is susceptible of embodiment in various forms, there is shown in the drawings and will hereinafter be described a presently preferred embodiment with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiment illustrated.
It should be further understood that the title of this section of this specification, namely, “Detailed Description Of The Invention”, relates to a requirement of the United States Patent Office, and does not imply, nor should be inferred to limit the subject matter disclosed herein.
Referring now to the figures and in particular to
An embodiment of the universal suspended anchoring system 10 itself is shown in
The ability to weld the threaded block 14 to different sides of the T-bracket 12 allows the universal suspended anchor system 10 to be used in a variety of situations. For example, the T-bracket 12 has tabs 16, 17 formed at the lateral ends of the T-bracket 12. When the threaded block 14 is welded to a tabbed edge 36 of the T-bracket 12 as shown in
To mount the universal suspended anchor system 10 to the truss 18, a rod 30 is coupled with the threaded block 14, as shown in
The mounted anchor system 10 is restrained in the truss in two ways: first, the square threaded block 14 is fitted between the vertical walls of the angle irons 20, 22, the walls holding to the sides of the threaded block 14. Second, the anchor is restrained by engaging the bracket tabs 16, 17 with the bearing surfaces 24, 26 of the angle irons 20, 22. By installing the anchor system 10 in such a manner, the need for welding or bolting an anchor system to a truss is eliminated.
Engaging both of the bracket tabs 16, 17 with the bearing surfaces 24, 26 of the two angle irons 20, 22, not only provides a means of restraint and reduces rotational movement, it also acts to distribute the load L of the anchor system 10 uniformly over two angle irons rather than one. Where prior industrial hangers are attached to one side of a joist and therefore, exhibit uneven load conditions across the joist, the present anchor system distributes the load L uniformly over two joists, creating more stability and reducing stress on both the truss 18 and the anchor system 10.
In one use of the anchor system 10, the threaded rod 30 is coupled to a nut 40, such as a KEPS® nut and a lock washer/plate 42, such as a KEPS® lock washer, as shown in
In one embodiment using the KEPS® nut and washer assembly, the KEPS® washer is a 1.53 inch square washer (LKW is approximately 1.53 inches) with a height HKW of approximately 0.13 inches. The KEPS® nut is shown with a height HKN of approximately 0.32-0.36 inches. The KEPS® nut and lock washers inhibit vibration and loosening, alleviating rattles and slippage of the anchor system 10.
In one use in which seismic considerations are taken into account, the anchor system 10 include the bracket 12 and square nut 14 and a relatively short threaded rod 30 that is engaged with the square nut 14. A coupling 46 is threadedly engages with the rod 30 on one end 48 and includes, at an opposite end 50, an internal thread 52 (national pipe thread—NPT) for mating with a length of pipe 54. The pipe 54 extends to, for example, a second coupling 56/clevis 58 for supporting the pipe P. The upper coupling 46 can be sized such that when it is threaded onto the rod 30, it also snugs up against the truss system 20, 22 to secure the bracket 12 in place on the truss system 20, 22. At the same time, the rigid pipe 54 provides sufficient strength and stiffness to account for seismic activity.
It will be appreciated that the present anchor system 10, with or without the seismic restraint can be readily installed from below the truss 18 by inserting the bracket 12/block 14 assembly between the angle irons 20, 22, until the bracket and nut 12, 14 clear the tops (bearing surfaces 24, 26 of the angles 20, 22), turning the hanger assembly 10 and resting the hanger 14 on the bearing surfaces 24, 26 of angle irons 20, 22, respectively. In addition, the square block 14 provides an indication of the orientation of the bracket. In that the block 14 is square, it can be determined that the bracket 12 is properly resting on the truss system when a face side 14a of the block 14 is perpendicular to the direction of the truss members.
All patents referred to herein, are hereby incorporated herein by reference, whether or not specifically done so within the text of this disclosure.
In the present disclosure, the words “a” or “an” are to be taken to include both the singular and the plural. Conversely, any reference to plural items shall, where appropriate, include the singular.
From the foregoing it will be observed that numerous modifications and variations can be effectuated without departing from the true spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the present invention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific embodiments illustrated is intended or should be inferred. The disclosure is intended to cover by the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
952053 | Tarleton | Mar 1910 | A |
1039587 | Pearce | Sep 1912 | A |
1145385 | Maple | Jul 1915 | A |
1155243 | Jordahl | Sep 1915 | A |
1360200 | Dowd | Nov 1920 | A |
1528777 | Marting | Mar 1925 | A |
1579419 | Tomkinson | Apr 1926 | A |
1709288 | Sutherland | Apr 1929 | A |
1837930 | Waite | Dec 1931 | A |
1856356 | Owen | May 1932 | A |
1941211 | Inglee | Dec 1933 | A |
1960003 | Ford | May 1934 | A |
2004462 | Bush | Jun 1935 | A |
2064290 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1936 | A |
2375513 | Bach | May 1945 | A |
2592315 | Evans | Apr 1952 | A |
2632620 | Hurley | Mar 1953 | A |
2676680 | Kindorf | Apr 1954 | A |
2944313 | Reiland | Jul 1960 | A |
3208560 | Cote | Sep 1965 | A |
3894707 | Heard | Jul 1975 | A |
4080712 | Weber | Mar 1978 | A |
4097015 | Frishman | Jun 1978 | A |
4099694 | Horwitz | Jul 1978 | A |
4119285 | Bisping et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4127252 | Splawn | Nov 1978 | A |
4186902 | Simons | Feb 1980 | A |
4240602 | McDonald | Dec 1980 | A |
4416095 | Truluck | Nov 1983 | A |
4524935 | Rumble | Jun 1985 | A |
4544119 | Kellett | Oct 1985 | A |
4575295 | Rebentisch | Mar 1986 | A |
4662590 | Hungerford, Jr. | May 1987 | A |
4679754 | Richards | Jul 1987 | A |
4790701 | Baubles | Dec 1988 | A |
4805855 | Kirby | Feb 1989 | A |
4993676 | Fitts et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5082216 | Roth | Jan 1992 | A |
5085393 | Ryan | Feb 1992 | A |
5154579 | Rezek | Oct 1992 | A |
5259165 | Koyama | Nov 1993 | A |
5351926 | Moses | Oct 1994 | A |
5873550 | Phillips | Feb 1999 | A |
5937073 | Van Gleson | Aug 1999 | A |
6012691 | van Leeuwen et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6086300 | Frohlich | Jul 2000 | A |
6452095 | Perrault | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6511028 | Gretz | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6609343 | Litten | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6672545 | Persing | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6837661 | Schwarz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868647 | Poldmaa | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7044701 | Herb | May 2006 | B2 |
7410140 | Hartwick | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410141 | Hartwick | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20040165965 | Unverzagt et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050056757 | Hartwick | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050252135 | Hartwick | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060254190 | Hunt | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3625885 | Feb 1988 | DE |
19734629 | Sep 1998 | DE |
1061277 | Dec 2000 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090008514 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |