The present invention relates to devices and methods for measuring the size of an anatomical valve annulus, and more particularly, to devices for use in measuring the size of a cardiac valve annulus in conjunction with implantation of an expandable prosthetic heart valve.
Various sutureless heart valve prostheses have been considered for replacing diseased or defective native cardiac valves (e.g., the aortic valve). One such type of prosthetic heart valve includes a radially collapsible/expandable stent, which supports a set of valve leaflets. Typically, the stent is radially contracted during implantation of the prosthetic valve at the desired location. To optimize performance, the stent is sized such that, if unrestrained, it can expand to a diameter somewhat greater than the diameter of the annulus of the valve to be replaced and/or the vessel proximate to the native valve (i.e., in the case of an aortic valve prosthesis, the ascending aorta).
To ensure proper anchoring and operation of the prosthetic valve in situ, it is helpful to assess the size of the patient's anatomical valve annulus. The annulus includes dense, fibrous rings attached to the adjacent atrial or ventricular muscle fibers. In some valve replacement procedures, the physician excises the defective native valve leaflets to prepare the annulus for implantation of the replacement valve. Typically, physicians use a set of sizing obturators, which are provided by various heart valve manufacturers, to obtain an estimate of the diameter of the native valve annulus. These sizing obturators typically include a cylindrical body having a flat, annular flange thereabout. The physician typically advances the flange to a location adjacent the superior aspect of the valve annulus, but does not typically advance the flange to an intra-annular position. This process may require the physician to repeatedly introduce various sizing obturators to the valve annulus to obtain this size estimate. This procedure requires much time and effort and offers minimal accuracy. This procedure also relies significantly on the skill of the implanting physician, as proper sizing is largely based upon the skill and technique of the physician.
The present invention, according to exemplary embodiments, is a device for measuring an internal dimension of a native cardiac valve annulus. The device includes an elongated support member having a proximal portion and a distal portion including an end having a bore and a longitudinal slot, a measuring band having a first end and a second end, the first end disposed within the bore and the second end coupled to the distal portion, a shaft extending through the support member, the shaft having a distal end coupled to the first end of the measuring band and a proximal end, and an indicator coupled to the proximal end of the shaft, the indicator adapted to provide an indication of the internal dimension. The measuring band has a contracted configuration in which the band is at least partially wound about a transverse axis and an expanded configuration in which the band is substantially unwound.
The present invention, according to other embodiments, is a device for measuring an internal dimension of a native cardiac valve annulus, the device comprising a body portion and a measuring portion, the measuring portion including an expandable element configured to substantially adapt to the shape of the annulus.
The present invention, according to other embodiments, is a method of implanting an expandable prosthetic valve at a native valve annulus. The method includes removing a native valve leaflet, debriding the native valve annulus, stressing the valve annulus by applying a force similar to that applied by a prosthetic valve, obtaining an estimate of the perimeter of the valve annulus, selecting an appropriate prosthetic valve based on the estimate, and implanting the appropriate prosthetic valve at the native valve annulus.
The present invention, according to another embodiment is a method of implanting an expandable prosthetic valve at a native valve annulus. The method includes removing a native valve leaflet, debriding the native valve annulus, stressing the valve annulus by applying a force similar to that applied by a prosthetic valve, obtaining an estimate of the perimeter of the valve annulus, selecting an appropriate prosthetic valve based on the estimate, and implanting the appropriate prosthetic valve at the native valve annulus.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a kit for implanting a sutureless prosthetic heart valve, the kit comprising a sizing tool for measuring an internal dimension of a native cardiac valve annulus, the sizing tool comprising an expandable element configured to substantially adapt to the shape of the annulus, and an expandable, stented prosthetic heart valve. The prosthetic heart valve, in some embodiments, generates a first radial force against the valve annulus upon implantation and the expandable element generates a second radial force, the second radial force differs from the first radial force by less than about 10%.
While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
As is known, and as shown in
The sizing device 10 may be used in connection with implantation of an expandable/contractible replacement heart valve of the type generally known in the art. The sizing device 10 may be used, for example, in connection with any sutureless aortic valve prostheses, for example, including percutaneously delivered aortic valve prostheses. In various exemplary embodiments, the sizing device 10 is used in connection with implantation of any of the prosthetic valves disclosed in co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/066,346 and 11/352,021, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
As further shown in
According to some embodiments, the device 10 is configured such that the adjustment mechanism 36 responds to movement imparted on the adjustable knob 34. For example, during use, a physician could apply a rotational force having a desired magnitude to the adjustable knob 34. This force in-turn causes a corresponding rotation of the adjustment mechanism 34. This rotation of the adjustment mechanism causes deployment of the measuring band 28. According to other embodiments, as further explained below, the measuring band 28 is biased to an open or expanded position, such that it self-expands inside the valve annulus, which causes rotation of the adjustment mechanism 36, which in-turn causes rotation of the adjustable knob 34. In some embodiments, the adjustable knob 34 or the adjustment mechanism 36 include a latch or lock for retaining the measuring band in the collapsed configuration. The physician may then manipulate this latch or lack at an appropriate time, to allow the measuring band to deploy or expand.
An annular member 38 is coupled near a proximal end of the elongated support member 32 adjacent the adjustable knob 34. The annular member or indicator 38 includes indicia 40 disposed circumferentially about the annular member. These indicia are configured to indicate a degree of deployment of the measuring band 28. In the embodiment of
The cylindrical holder 44 includes an opening or slot 52 extending longitudinally through a portion thereof. In some embodiments, the slot 52 extends along the entire length of the holder 44 from the proximal end 46 to the distal end 48. Adjacent the slot 52 is a coupling edge 54. As shown, the holder 44 also includes an annular lip 56 located at the distal end 48. In other embodiments, the holder 44 includes an annular lip at the proximal end 46 as well. The cylindrical holder 44 defines an internal, central chamber or bore 60.
As shown in
In some embodiments, the measuring band 28 includes a longitudinally extending radiopaque portion to facilitate visualization of the measuring band during use of the device. In other embodiments, the longitudinally extending edge (or edges) of the measuring band 28 are tapered or otherwise softened, to help minimize trauma to the valve annulus 14 or adjacent tissue during a sizing procedure.
According to various embodiments the hub portion 45 and the measuring band 28 are removable from the holder 44. In these embodiments, the measuring band 28 and hub portion 45 of the sizing device 10 are readily disposable after use, while the remaining portions of the device may be sterilized and reused by the physician. In these embodiment, for example, the measuring band can be removed by unwinding and expanding the measuring band and then manipulating the measuring band around the distal annular lip 56. The measuring band 28 and hub 45 can then be slid distally out of the holder 44 for disposal. A new, sterile measuring band 28 and hub 45 can then be inserted into the holder 44, and the engagement portion 76 coupled to the coupling rod.
As shown in
According to some embodiments, the measuring band 28 is unwound and expanded manually by the implanting physician. In these embodiments, the physician can expand and contract the measuring band by turning the adjustable knob 34. As explained above, the adjustable knob 34 is coupled (using, for example, a coupling rod) to the adjustment mechanism 36. Specifically, in various embodiments, the adjustable knob is coupled to the hub portion 45 of the adjustment mechanism. By turning the adjustable knob 34, the physician can effect a corresponding rotation of the hub portion, which in turn will effect an unwinding or unfurling of the measuring band 28. In these embodiments, the physician can rotate the adjustable knob 34 until she feels a certain degree of resistance, which corresponds to an amount of radial force applied by valve annulus 14 against the measuring band 28. When the physician determines that she has caused an appropriate amount of force against the valve annulus, she can read the indicia 40 on the handle, which indicates the corresponding diameter or effective length of the measuring band 28.
In some embodiments, the sizing device 10 includes a torque limiting device of the type known in the art. This torque limiter is placed between the knob 34 and the adjustment mechanism 36 and prevents the physician from applying an excessive force of a magnitude that could cause damage to the native valve annulus.
According to other embodiments, the measuring band 28 is made from a superelastic material, which is biased to the fully expanded configuration. In one such exemplary embodiment, the measuring band is made from a material and has dimensions selected such that the measuring band will expand to a diameter greater than the largest expected valve annulus diameter. In one embodiment, for example, the measuring band 28 is biased to an expanded configuration (such as that shown in
As will be apparent to the skilled artisan, by setting the self-expanding radial force of the measuring band 28 approximately equal to the radial force generated by the prosthetic valve to be implanted, the sizing device 10 may obtain a more accurate measure of the internal dimensions of the valve annulus upon implantation of the prosthetic valve. The implantation of a self-expanding prosthetic valve may result in a change in shape and/or size of the valve annulus 14, which changes will be detected by the sizing device 10 of the present invention. In these embodiments, the implanting physician allows the measuring band to expand inside the valve annulus and then reads the corresponding dimensional information from the indicia 40 disposed on the annular member 38.
According to various embodiments, the measuring band 28 is sufficiently flexible to allow it to substantially conform to the internal surface of the valve annulus 14. In some embodiments, for example, the measuring band 28 is able to readily take on a radius of curvature of less than about 2 mm. This flexibility allows the measuring band to substantially conform to valve annuli having irregular shapes.
According to other embodiments, the measuring portion 108 is self-expanding. In some such embodiments, the measuring portion 108 is expanded in an unbiased position, such that it defines an overall diameter that is slightly larger than a diameter of the target valve annulus. In exemplary embodiments, the measuring portion 108 is made from a polymer or metal having shape memory and/or superelastic properties. Once such class of superelastic materials well known in the art are nickel-titanium alloys, such as nitinol. In some embodiments, the measuring portion is held in a collapsed or compressed configuration by a sheath or tube disposed over the elongated support member 110. The measuring portion 108 is then deployed (i.e., allowed to self-expand) by retracting the sheath and allowing the measuring portion to expand radially into contact with an inner surface of a valve annulus. In such embodiments, the elongated support member may include indicia which are disposed axially along the shaft such that the indicia correspond to a diameter or circumference of the measuring portion 108. In this fashion, the indicia will provide the user with an indication of the diameter or circumference of the target valve annulus.
Various modifications and additions can be made to the exemplary embodiments discussed without departing from the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the scope of the claims, together with all equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/222,598, filed Mar. 22, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/727,098, filed Mar. 18, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,715,207, which claims the benefit of provisional application No. 61/161,462, filed Mar. 19, 2009, entitled “UNIVERSAL VALVE ANNULUS SIZING DEVICE,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3363442 | Kennedy et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3744140 | Kyrk | Jul 1973 | A |
5042161 | Hodge | Aug 1991 | A |
5360014 | Sauter et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5489296 | Love et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505689 | Kramer et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522884 | Wright | Jun 1996 | A |
5560487 | Starr | Oct 1996 | A |
5669919 | Sanders et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672169 | Verbeek | Sep 1997 | A |
5693066 | Rupp et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5698307 | Levy | Dec 1997 | A |
5776187 | Krueger et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800531 | Cosgrove et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810873 | Morales | Sep 1998 | A |
5814096 | Lam et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814098 | Hinnenkamp et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5885031 | White | Mar 1999 | A |
5885228 | Rosenman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5947993 | Morales | Sep 1999 | A |
5951540 | Verbeek | Sep 1999 | A |
5972016 | Morales | Oct 1999 | A |
5984959 | Robertson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6019739 | Rhee et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024737 | Morales | Feb 2000 | A |
6051002 | Morales | Apr 2000 | A |
6063102 | Morales | May 2000 | A |
6110200 | Hinnenkamp | Aug 2000 | A |
6202272 | Jackson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6277110 | Morales | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309383 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6350281 | Rhee | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352547 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387117 | Arnold, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402780 | Williamson, IV et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6424885 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6481262 | Ching et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6493608 | Niemeyer | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506201 | Di Caprio et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510722 | Ching et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6598307 | Love et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6629350 | Motsenbocker | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6676684 | Morley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678962 | Love et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6726713 | Schaldach, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6769161 | Brown et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6846324 | Stobie | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6915560 | Austin | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6966924 | Holmberg | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968607 | Motsenbocker | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981982 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988881 | Motsenbocker et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7007396 | Rudko et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021114 | Perreault | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7069794 | Motsenbocker et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7090688 | Nishtala | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7258698 | Lemmon | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7338484 | Schoon et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7357814 | Gabbay | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367984 | Kulcinski et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7427291 | Liddicoat et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7453227 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455690 | Cartledge et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7857845 | Stacchino et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8006535 | Righini et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8109996 | Stacchino et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20010049558 | Liddicoat et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020035390 | Schaldach et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042651 | Liddicoat et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020129820 | Ryan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020198594 | Schreck | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030114913 | Spenser et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125805 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030192164 | Austin | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040039436 | Spenser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040123437 | Kokish | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193259 | Gabbay | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225356 | Frater | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050166389 | Perreault et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197695 | Stacchino et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197696 | Gomez Duran | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229670 | Perreault | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234537 | Edin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240256 | Austin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267529 | Crockett et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283232 | Gabbay | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004469 | Sokel | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060074486 | Liddicoat et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060178740 | Stacchino et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060265855 | Stenzel | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070027534 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070056346 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061009 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100356 | Lucatero et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070151116 | Malandain | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162113 | Sharkawy et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173861 | Strommer et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080147160 | Ghione et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147182 | Righini et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080262603 | Giaquinta et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281232 | Lansac | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090018570 | Righini et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090069886 | Suri et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069887 | Righini et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099653 | Suri et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090192602 | Kuehn | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192603 | Ryan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090287296 | Manasse | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100160832 | Braido | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29911694 | Sep 1999 | DE |
102004019254 | Nov 2005 | DE |
0155245 | May 1990 | EP |
0515324 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0401199 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0778009 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1353420 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1174098 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1690515 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1570809 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2083362 | Mar 1982 | GB |
11332997 | Dec 1999 | JP |
WO1996039942 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO1997024989 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO1998014138 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO1999053864 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO1999053866 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO1999055255 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO2000006052 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO2000021464 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO2000030565 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO2001021076 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO2001021097 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO2001021110 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO2001076510 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO2002011646 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO2001021103 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO2002092257 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO2005082578 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2006007401 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006088712 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO2006117016 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2006127089 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2006136930 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO2007030825 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2008089365 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP Communication issued in EP 07112385 dated Jul. 30, 2009. |
Extended European Search Report issued in EP 07106697, dated Aug. 21, 2007, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in EP 07112385, dated Apr. 1, 2008, 11 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in EP 10168449, dated Aug. 19, 2010, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2010/028873, dated Jun. 15, 2010, 11 pages. |
Partial European Search Report issued in EP 07112385, dated Jan. 4, 2008, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170156866 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61161462 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14222598 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15433970 | US | |
Parent | 12727098 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 14222598 | US |