The invention relates to the field of unstacking stacks of flat articles, and in particular stacks of large-format mailpieces or “flats”, such as brochures, so as to put them into series and to convey them in series in a conveyor.
The invention relates more particularly to an unstacker device for unstacking flat articles, said unstacker device comprising:
Such a mailpiece unstacker device is known in which the retaining means are caused to operate systematically in response to the signal delivered by a pass sensor disposed at the inlet of the conveyor. Such an arrangement suffers from the drawback of braking the movement of all of the mailpieces, thereby adversely affecting the performance of the unstacker device. In addition, with the retaining means being actuated systematically, mailpieces of small thickness can be damaged, and mailpieces of larger thickness can be incorrectly separated.
An object of the invention is to improve an unstacker device for unstacking flat articles, and in particular flat mailpieces, so that the retaining means are actuated more effectively in order to separate mailpieces that are unstacked together, i.e. superposed mailpieces, so that they do not enter the conveyor. This makes it possible to present the mailpieces one by one at an optimum rate at the inlet of the conveyor.
To this end, the invention provides an unstacker device for unstacking flat articles, said unstacker device comprising:
said unstacker device being characterized in that it further comprises a detector device suitable for sensing the trace of each unstacked article moving between the jogging edge and the inlet of the conveyor and for analyzing said trace so as to detect the presence of a plurality of articles moving together, and, on the basis of such detection, so as to actuate said retaining means for the purpose of separating the articles that are moving together.
The trace of each unstacked article (the impression of the bottom edge of each article) can be sensed by optical means such as a linear array camera, but other types of detector may be used, e.g. a comb-shaped detector. The trace of each unstacked article can thus reveal the presence of a plurality of articles moving together, and the relative positions of the mailpieces, and therefore such a trace makes it possible, when, for example, two articles are moving together, to determine which one is ahead of the other in the unstacking direction. Such determination makes it possible to improve the control of actuation of the retaining means compared with the systematic actuation in the prior art. Tests have shown that only 60% of the situations in which mailpieces move together can be corrected by a conventional unstacker device in which the retaining means are activated systematically. With such a prior art device, when mailpieces are unstacked together, if the mailpiece that is further ahead is the one on the same side as the retaining means (the other mailpiece that is further behind being the one driven by the unstacking plate), the action of the retaining means has no effect since the mailpiece that is further ahead is already being driven by the conveyor, and can therefore no longer be separated from the mailpiece that is further behind. With the unstacker device of the invention, situations in which mailpieces are unstacked together are detected early, thereby making it possible to actuate the retaining means before the mailpieces reach the inlet of the conveyor. In addition, it is possible to consider actuating the retaining means differently depending on various configurations of the mailpiece unstacking. This early detection makes it possible to process 40% of unstacked-together mailpieces that are not handled by a prior art unstacker device.
An unstacker device of the invention may advantageously present the following features:
The invention is described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings that show non-limiting examples of the invention, and in which:
On the unstacking plate 4, there are disposed drive means 6, e.g. a perforated belt co-operating with an unstacking solenoid valve, suitable for driving the first mailpiece 2A of the stack to be unstacked 2 that faces the unstacking plate 4 in a certain unstacking direction indicated by the arrow A, parallel to the unstacking plate 4 and perpendicular to the jogging edge 5.
As shown in
The retaining means 8 are disposed on one side of the path of the mailpieces in the direction A so as to exert a retaining force on a mailpiece moving between the jogging edge and the inlet of the conveyor, said retaining force opposing movement of said mailpiece in the unstacking direction A. As explained below, the unstacker device of the invention may, for example, include two retaining means mutually opposite about the unstacking direction A, i.e. disposed on either side of the path of the mailpieces between the jogging edge and the inlet of the conveyor, or indeed two or more retaining means lined up on the same side of the path of the mailpieces.
The detector device 9 comprises an optical device that, in this example, is a linear array camera 13 of the charge-coupled device (CCD) type, disposed under the path of the mailpieces between the jogging edge 5 and the inlet 7A. Preferably, the camera 13 is placed in the vicinity of the jogging edge 5 and upstream from the retaining means 8 relative to the unstacking direction A so as to enable mailpieces that are moving together to be detected early. The linear array camera 13 extends transversely to the unstacking direction A so as to sense an image of the trace of each mailpiece moving between the jogging edge 5 (or the unstacking plate 4) and the inlet 7A of the conveyor. The image may, in particular, be a digital grayscale image. As indicated above, instead of using the camera 13, it is possible, for example, to use a sensor of the tactile comb type that is sensitive to the weight of the mailpiece.
Between the unstacking plate 4 and the conveyor 7, pass sensors 11, 12 may be provided, e.g. photocells, each of which comprises an emitter and a receiver. In particular, a first sensor 11 is disposed at the jogging edge 5 for detecting the leading edge of each mailpiece as soon as it leaves the unstacking plate. A second sensor 12 is disposed at the inlet 7A of the conveyor for detecting the leading edge of each mailpiece arriving at the inlet 7A of the conveyor.
In order to increase the compactness of the detector device 9 so as to make it easier to incorporate mechanically into the unstacker device 1, the axis 15B of the lighting device 15 extends substantially perpendicularly to the axis 13B of the camera 13, and a beam splitter 16 is provided to position the lighting in such a manner as to align it with the axis 13B of the camera 13. The beam splitter 16 (e.g. a plate) is thus positioned both at about 45° relative to the axis 13B of the camera 13 and also at about 45° relative to the axis 15B of the lighting device 15 so as to deflect the light beam 15A. The camera 13 thus acquires images of the mailpiece 2A through the beam splitter 16. Such a lighting device 15 with a beam splitter 16 makes it possible to increase the depth of field of the detector device 9 while improving the lighting of the mailpiece 2A.
The camera 13 is preferably a 512-pixel linear array sensor, and the resolution of the acquired images may be about 16 pixels per millimeter (mm) in the direction B, representing the limit for being able to detect a mailpiece 2A or a gap between two mailpieces of thickness less than 0.1 mm. The frequency of acquisition, at a speed of about 2.4 meters per second (m/s), results in a resolution of about 4 pixels per millimeter or 4 rows per millimeter. In a variant, the camera 13 may be a matrix array camera that acquires a two-dimensional image of the edge of the mailpiece 2A directly.
The camera 13 may be positioned at a slot provided in the sole of the unstacker between the unstacking plate and the conveyor. It should be far enough away from the jogging edge 5 to avoid sensing the image of a mailpiece awaiting unstacking in the magazine 3, but near enough for the retaining means 8 to be actuated in real time through a data-processing unit 10. As described below, the unit 10 is arranged to analyze the image of the trace of a mailpiece in order to detect the presence of a plurality of mailpieces unstacked together in a bunch, and thus to count the number of mailpieces and to determine their relative positions and, when a plurality of mailpieces are detected, to actuate the retaining means 8.
In the configuration of the unstacker device 1 shown in
The processing unit 10 is thus arranged so as to determine, when mailpieces are unstacked together, the type of the mailpiece S, P, N, or Pf, and thus so as to control the retaining means 8 appropriately.
The analysis may also be performed on partial images of 32 columns with a sliding window, e.g. a window that slides four columns by four columns so as to have an overlap between successive images and so as to refresh the analysis every 4 columns of image acquisition, i.e. every millimeter of advance of the mailpieces.
The two-dimensional partial image is formed in a memory in step 42 and is analyzed in step 43 so as to determine whether a plurality of mailpieces are being unstacked together and so as to determine the number of mailpieces present. During this analysis, the current mailpiece(s) continue to move in the direction A, and it is possible to estimate that two acquisition rows are lost, corresponding to a length of 0.5 mm of the trace of the mailpiece before complete refreshing of the partial image. When a plurality of mailpieces are detected, the processing continues with determination of the type of mailpiece S, or P, N, or Pf non-standard in step 44 so as to control the retaining means 45 while possibly taking account of a history at 46 as described below.
Steps 43 and 44 are shown in more detail in
In step 61, a partial image is built in a memory. Image analysis consists in determining the number of unstacked-together mailpieces visible in said image. For this purpose, use is made of the fact that there exists a space 18 of magnitude that can vary between the traces of a plurality of mailpieces in the image, as can be seen in
In the image, this results in an alternation of dark zones 20 (the traces of the mailpieces) and of pale zones 19 (around the mailpieces and space 18). The number of transitions between a dark zone and a pale zone in the direction B is a robust characteristic making it possible to determine mailpiece type. Naturally, it can be understood that, depending on the imaging convention that is chosen, the space 18 could, conversely, correspond to a dark zone and the mailpieces could correspond to pale zones.
In order to count the number of transitions in an image in step 62, firstly the image is subdivided in the direction B into strips 21 of fixed size as can be seen in
Then, for each strip 21, a search is made for the number of extrema in terms of grayscale levels that correspond to dark/pale transitions. As is known, searching for extrema can firstly consist in searching for local maxima and minima, and then, if the local maxima or minima are not very different or too similar, they are rejected, until a minimum is found that is situated between two maxima for detecting two mailpieces. Then, computation is performed that is representative of the mean number Sc of transitions for the entire image portion using the following relationship:
It can be understood that Sc generally lies in the range 0 for a mailpiece S that is unstacked on its own to 1 for two bunched-together mailpieces. However, in practice, Sc may be greater than 1 when three or more mailpieces have been unstacked together. The score Sc can be likened to the concept of degree of belonging to fuzzy subsets. Delivering as output a fuzzy degree of belonging constitutes a major advantage of this approach, because it makes it possible to go from one mailpiece S to a plurality of unstacked-together mailpieces continuously, thereby avoiding threshold effects.
On the basis of the mean number Sc of transitions, firstly, for a current unstacked mailpiece, it is determined whether it belongs to one of the two categories constituted by the S type and by the nS type merely by thresholding on the score Sc. Thus, the mailpieces for which Sc is zero (step 63) are declared to be of the S type at 64, and the mailpieces for which Sc is greater than a certain threshold τ (step 65) are declared to be of the nS type at 66 (i.e. all of the mailpieces that it can be certain are not of the S type). The mailpieces for which Sc lies in the range 0 to τ (step 67) have an equal chance of belonging to either of the types (S or nS). This range of values Sc is a zone of uncertainty for the method that corresponds to an ambiguous classification of the mailpieces at 68. The threshold τ is thus chosen so as to obtain a good compromise between sorting to incorrect directions (generated by nS-type mailpieces that are detected as being S-type mailpieces) and S-type mailpieces being detected incorrectly as being nS-type mailpieces.
If the mailpieces have been declared to be of the nS type with a confidence rating that is sufficiently reliable in step 66, the method continues in step 44 with a labeling algorithm designed to determine the types of the mailpieces that are unstacked together, namely positive, negative, or perfect.
In step 69, the labeling algorithm consists in extracting left and right profiles of the mailpiece from the GS image, and then in analyzing said profiles for the purpose of detecting peaks. A left profile Pl(i) of the current mailpiece is defined as being the set of the first pixels having a grayscale level greater than a certain threshold σ when each row of the GS image is scanned from left to right in the direction B perpendicular to the conveying direction A as indicated in
Pl(i)=Min {j/image[i,j]>σ} where i and j are the co-ordinates of each pixel, i designating the row position index and j designating the column position index, and image[i,j] is the value of the pixel of co-ordinates (i,j) in the GS image.
In the same way, a right profile Pr(i) is defined as being the set of the last pixels having a grayscale level greater than the threshold σ in the direction B perpendicular to the conveying direction A as indicated in
Pr(i)=Max{j/image[i,j]>σ}
It can be understood that the threshold σ may be different for defining the left profile or the right profile, for example so as to take account of shadow phenomena.
The labeling algorithm continues by defining left and right peaks in the profiles as being local extrema of the respective functions |Pl(i+1)−Pl(i)| for the left profile and |Pr(i+1)−Pr(i)| for the right profile.
Finally, depending on whether peaks are present in or absent from the profiles, the algorithm labels the mailpieces in the following manner:
Then, depending on the result obtained, and based on a history of previous decisions 46, the unit 10 activates or does not active the retaining means 8 in step 45:
The history of the decisions 46 enables the unit 10 to monitor the movement of the mailpieces and to adapt the activation over time, until the mailpieces are driven in the conveyor 7. For example, when mailpieces are labeled as P type or N type on the basis of a first image, the next image gives a “Pf-type” result corresponding to the place where two mailpieces are superposed without it being necessary to trigger corresponding actuation of the retaining means 8.
The advantage procured by the unstacker device 1 of the invention is twofold. Firstly, incorrect activation of the retaining means 8 when S-type mailpieces are present is minimized, thereby reducing the risk of damaging the mail and improving the throughput rate of the unstacker device 1. Secondly, when a non-standard mailpiece is present, activation of the retaining means 8 at the appropriate time makes it possible to avoid simultaneously driving a plurality of mailpieces in the conveyor 7.
In
As shown in
In the unstacker device 100, the two cameras 110 make it possible to monitor in real time the action of the drive means 107 and of the retaining means 111, and, as a function of the result of said action, to control in real time each of the retaining means 111 through a data-processing unit 112. For example, when a plurality of mailpieces are unstacked together, the two retaining means 111 can be controlled selectively in different manner so as either to brake or not to brake a particular mailpiece.
It is to be understood that the description of the embodiments above is in no way limiting on the invention. For example, it is possible to dispose two or more retaining means 8 face to face, in mutual opposition in the conveying direction A, in order to improve the retention of conveyed-together mailpieces and in order to improve the organization of the mailpieces in succession in the unstacking direction C.
In addition, the method of the invention may incorporate measuring the thickness of each mailpiece and/or the speed of movement of the mailpieces and/or the relative movement of the mailpieces that have been unstacked together so as to determine the effectiveness with which the mailpieces are retained and thus the effectiveness with which they are separated, and so as to adjust the retaining force as appropriate. Thus, it is possible to adjust the retaining force applied to the mailpieces by the retaining means so as to take account of the relative fragility of each mailpiece.
It is also possible, on the basis of the GS images of the mailpieces, to determine whether or not staples are present on the edge of a mailpiece, indicating whether the mailpiece is an open one (with staples) or a closed one (without staples), and making it possible to adjust the retaining force applied to the mailpiece so as to avoid damaging open mailpieces.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0954931 | Jul 2009 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2010/051417 | 7/5/2010 | WO | 00 | 9/13/2010 |