In most general purpose computers, an operating system is the primary software that manages access to resources within the computer. The primary resources are the central processing unit (CPU), which executes application programs designed to run on the computer, main memory and storage. In some computer architectures, additional processing units (such as multiple cores in a processor) and/or additional processors, called co-processors, may be present. Examples of such co-processors include a graphic processing unit (GPU) and a digital signal processor (DSP). The operating system also manages access to these resources by multiple processes.
A field programmable gate array (FPGA) is a kind of logic device that is commonly used in specialized computing devices. An FPGA typically is used to perform a specific, dedicated function, for which a gate array is particularly well-suited. FPGAs typically are found in peripheral devices, or other specialized hardware, such as a printed circuit board connected to and accessed through a system bus such as a PCI bus. In general, such devices are programmed once, and used many times. Because these devices are programmable, they have an advantage over other specialized logic devices in that they can be updated in the field.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
One or more field programmable gate arrays (FPGA) can be used as a shared programmable co-processor resource in a general purpose computing system. An FPGA can be programmed to perform functions, which in turn can be associated with one or more processes. With multiple processes, the FPGA can be shared, and a process is assigned to at least one portion of the FPGA during a time slot in which to access the FPGA. Programs written in a hardware description language for programming the FPGA are made available as a hardware library. The operating system manages allocating the FPGA resources to processes, programming the FPGA in accordance with the functions to be performed by the processes using the FPGA and scheduling use of the FPGA by these processes.
Given a set of hardware libraries in a system, an update process can be provided to periodically (or, on request) update the libraries to add new libraries or change existing libraries to new versions. One or more update servers can provide information about libraries available for download, either in response to a request or by notifying systems using such libraries. New available libraries can be presented to a user for selection and download. Requests for updated libraries can arise in several ways, such as through polling for updates, exceptions from applications attempting to use libraries, and upon compilation of application code.
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which are shown, by way of illustration, specific example implementations of this technique. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
The following section provides a brief, general description of an example computing environment in which an operating system for managing use of FPGA resources can be implemented. The system can be implemented with numerous general purpose or special purpose computing devices. Examples of well known computing devices that may be suitable include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices (for example, media players, notebook computers, cellular phones, personal data assistants, voice recorders), multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, game consoles, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
With reference to
The computing device may include multiple processing units and/or additional co-processing units such as a graphics processing unit (GPU). The computing device also includes one or more field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), denoted as FPGA unit 120 which is available as a shared (among processes running on the computer) co-processing resource. An FPGA may reside in its own CPU socket or on a separate card plugged into an expansion slot, such as a Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCI-E) slot. By providing such an FPGA unit, a variety of functions that are well-suited for implementation by a gate array can be implemented with the resulting benefit of hardware acceleration.
Depending on the configuration of the processing unit and the FPGA unit, the unit, or each functional unit within it, has an associated input/output channel for communication with host operating system processes. For example, a memory region dedicated to the functional unit and shared between it and a process using that functional unit can be provided. A sort of request queue and response queue also can be used to enable asynchronous invocation of operations implemented in the FPGA unit. Additionally, state of the functional units in the FPGA unit for a process can be saved to and restored from a memory region for the functional unit and that process. Alternatively other techniques can be used to ensure that the functional unit is in a known state before it is used by its process.
Depending on the configuration and type of computing device, memory 104 may be volatile (such as RAM), non-volatile (such as ROM, flash memory, etc.) or some combination of the two. This configuration of a processing unit, co-processor and memory is illustrated in
Computing device 100 may also have additional resources and devices. For example, computing device 100 may include additional storage (removable and/or non-removable) including, but not limited to, magnetic or optical disks or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in
Computing device 100 also can include communications connection(s) 112 that allow the device to communicate with other devices over a communication medium. The implementation of the communications connection 112 is dependent on the kind of communication medium being accessed by the computing device, as it provides an interface to such a medium to permit transmission and/or reception of data over the communication medium. A communication medium typically carries computer program instructions, data files, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media.
Computing device 100 may have various input device(s) 114 such as a keyboard, mouse, pen, camera, touch input device, and so on. Output device(s) 116 such as a display, speakers, a printer, and so on may also be included. All of these devices are well known in the art and need not be discussed at length here.
Applications executed on a computing device are implemented using computer-executable instructions and/or computer-interpreted instructions, such as program modules, that are processed by the computing device. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, and so on, that, when processed by a processing unit, instruct the processing unit to perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. In a distributed computing environment, such tasks can be performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
An operating system executed on a computing device manages access to the various resources of the computer device by processes. Typically, running an application on the computer system causes one or more processes to be created, with each process being allocated to different resources over time. If a resource is shared among processes, and if the processes cannot share the resource concurrently, then the operating system schedules access to the resource over time. One of such resources is the FPGA unit 120 of
Referring to
To illustrate how different functional units can be used over time, reference is now made to
To allow such usage of the FPGA resources by different processes over time, the operating system has a scheduler that determines which process has access to the FPGA resources at each scheduling quantum, i.e., time period, and when an FPGA functional unit will be programmed with a hardware library so that the functional unit is available to be used by that process. Thus, an implementation of a scheduler for the FPGA unit is dependent in part on the nature of the FPGA unit and the one or more FPGAs it includes. Factors related to the FPGAs to be considered include, but are not limited to, the following. For example, in some cases an entire FPGA is refreshed to program a functional unit if one functional unit cannot be programmed independently of other functional units. Another consideration is the speed with which a functional unit can be programmed, and whether programming of a functional unit prevents other functional units from being used during that programming phase. Another factor to consider is whether processes can share a hardware library by sharing a functional unit. The scheduler also takes into account such factors as the number of concurrent processes, application performance guarantees, priority of applications, process context switching costs, access to memory and buses, and availability of software libraries if no functional unit is available within the FPGA unit.
There may be other instances where the FPGA unit provides a general purpose facility to applications or the operating system, which therefore are scheduled for the length of an application instantiation. For example, custom network protocols or offloading can be offered as an accelerated service on the FPGA unit. System calls or standard library calls, normally executed in a general purpose CPU, can be accelerated using the FPGA unit instead. Further, the operating system can multiplex the CPU based on preferences for process priority. In another instance, the operating system can use a profile of an application, generated statically or dynamically, to predict the functionality best suited for running on an FPGA unit and then pre-load that functionality so that it is available for scheduling. By using the profile as a guide, the operating system can ensure there is both space and time available on the FPGA unit to accelerate the application. Finally, the operating system can use simple hints from the application to know when to schedule time on the FPGA unit. For example, certain calls into the operating system (system calls) can denote long delays (calls to disk or the network), which provides a hint that the FPGA unit can be free for some amount of time for other threads or processes to use. Therefore, the operating system uses a variety of hints and preferences to create a schedule to multiplex access to the FPGA unit. Because the operating system controls the scheduler, it has detailed knowledge of executing and pending work, available hardware libraries, and time it takes to program an FPGA. Therefore, it can use this knowledge to determine which processes leverage the FPGA during execution.
Having now described a general overview of such computer architecture, an example implementation for updating the hardware libraries will now be described.
Referring to
The update server also can be configured to be accessible not only by the update process, but also, or alternatively, through a conventional web browser or other user interface. The update server can provide one or more virtual storefronts as an interfaced through which hardware libraries can be made available for selection, sale and/or download to users. Such an interface can include information describing the library and pricing and other terms for downloading the library.
After the update process receives the information about available libraries, a list 512 of available libraries can be presented to a user for selection through a user interface 514. Through appropriate input devices in the user interface, the user can provide the update process an indication of a selection 516 of one or more libraries for download.
The update process can trigger a request for hardware libraries based on a variety of conditions. For example, code analysis could identify functions that are known to have corresponding hardware libraries. An application can trigger an exception when executed if a hardware library is unavailable or if an error occurs using it. In such a case, the operating system can attempt to handle the exception by using a corresponding software library if available. Alternatively, the operating system or application loader can make the decision about whether to dynamically link to a hardware or software library when the application is loaded. System parameters could be used to indicate whether a hardware library should be updated. Accordingly, as shown in
The channel between the update process and the update server can be secured to ensure the update process is communicating with a legitimate update server. Similarly, libraries downloaded from the update server can be authenticated as being authored by a trusted source to improve security.
The terms “article of manufacture”, “process”, “machine” and “composition of matter” in the preambles of the appended claims are intended to limit the claims to subject matter deemed to fall within the scope of patentable subject matter defined by the use of these terms in 35 U.S.C. §101.
Any or all of the aforementioned alternate embodiments described herein may be used in any combination desired to form additional hybrid embodiments. It should be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific implementations described above. The specific implementations described above are disclosed as examples only.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5748979 | Trimberger | May 1998 | A |
5752035 | Trimberger | May 1998 | A |
5915025 | Taguchi et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6557156 | Guccione | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6704816 | Burke | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6823069 | Kitajima et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6907126 | Inada | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6941538 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7028283 | Keller et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7134025 | Trimberger | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7512813 | Goodnow et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7587699 | McCubbrey | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7669168 | Patterson | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7702927 | Devadas et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711964 | Van Essen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7788502 | Donlin et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7870223 | Grgic et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7908476 | Kandasamy et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7975062 | Krikorian et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8065517 | Cizas et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8230374 | McCubbrey | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8369460 | Su | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8417965 | Sundararajan et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8448122 | Suthar et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8516268 | Woodall | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8612409 | Tomkins et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620967 | Wessling | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620996 | Athale et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621008 | Chebiyyam | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8627052 | Mohrmann et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20010037457 | Inada | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043082 | Wittig et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020055947 | Schultz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030086300 | Noyes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110463 | Kuhlmann et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030172303 | Adusumilli | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040019765 | Klein, Jr. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040049672 | Nollet et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040060032 | McCubbrey | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040123258 | Butts | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040230934 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060015313 | Wang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015862 | Odom et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060059373 | Fayad et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060156406 | Bantz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070074045 | Van Essen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129818 | Andrade et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070277161 | Herbordt et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080104601 | Kaneko et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133899 | Park et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090119503 | Isaakian et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090282386 | Moir et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288076 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293051 | Krywaniuk | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100202239 | Moshayedi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100293356 | Plunkett et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110145780 | Chen | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153981 | Yancey et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120047371 | Woodall | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120117549 | Doyle et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120191967 | Lin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130346758 | LaMacchia et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346759 | LaMacchia et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346979 | Nightingale et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346985 | Nightingale | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1284681 | Feb 2001 | CN |
2650231 | Oct 2004 | CN |
101222743 | Jul 2008 | CN |
201371945 | Dec 2009 | CN |
102087600 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102119390 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102324006 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102377564 | Mar 2012 | CN |
1930834 | Jun 2008 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2015 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,175. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 13, 2015 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,400. |
Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2015 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,251. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/046418”, Mailed Date: Sep. 11, 2013, Filed Date: Jun. 18, 2013, 11 pages. |
Frigo et al., “Evaluation of the Streams-C C-to-FPGA Compiler: An Applications Perspective”, Feb. 13, 2001, Copyright 2001 ACM, (Frigo—2001.pdf; pp. 1-7). |
Lysecky et al., “Dynamic FPGA Routing for Just-in-Time FPGA compilation”, University of California, Jun. 11, 2004; (Lysecky—2004.pdf; pp. 1-6). |
David Max Meisner, “Design of a shared hardware library for multi-core environments in FPGA fabrics”, Honor Thesis submitted to Brown University, Apr. 24, 2007; (Meisner—2007; pp. 1-48). |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT patent Application No. PCT/US2013/046881”, Mailed Date: Nov. 29, 2013, Filed Date: Jun. 20, 2013, 9 pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/046871”, Mailed Date: Oct. 15, 2013, Filed Date: Jun. 20, 2013, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,175, Apr. 11, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,251, Jun. 6, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,400, Sep. 13, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,400, Jun. 16, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,438, Sep. 16, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,438, Apr. 16, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,251. |
Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2014 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,400. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 29, 2014 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,438. |
Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2014 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,175. |
Shibamura, et al., “Express-1: A Dynamically Reconfigurable Platform Using Embedded Processor FPGA”, In IEEE International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology, Dec. 6, 2004, 8 Pages. |
Huang, et al., “Function-Level Multitasking Interface Design in an Embedded Operating System with Reconfigurable Hardware”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, Dec. 17, 2007, 22 Pages. |
Vuletic, et al., “Seamless Hardware-Software Integration in Reconfigurable Computing Systems”, In IEEE Design & Test of Computers, vol. 22, Issue 2, Mar. 2005, 12 Pages. |
Marescaux, et al., “Run-Time Support for Heterogeneous Multitasking on Reconfigurable SoCs”, In Integration, the VLSI Journal—Special Issue: Networks on Chip and Reconfigurable Fabrics, vol. 38, Issue 1, Oct. 2004, 24 Pages. |
“International Search Report Written Opinion for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/046719”, Mailed Date: Sep. 11, 2013, Filed Date: Jun. 20, 2013, 10 Pages. |
First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201310248192.3, Mailed Date: Oct. 10, 2015, 14 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 31, 2015 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,400. |
Jain, et al., “Speeding Up Program Execution Using Reconfigurable Hardware and a Hardware Function Library”, In Proceedings of Eleventh International Conference on VLSI Design, Jan. 1998, 6 pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2015 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,175 (Copy Attached). |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2015 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,251 (Copy Attached). |
First Office Action Received in Chinese Patent Application No. 201310245064.3, Mailed Date: Dec. 24, 2015, 14 Pages. |
First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201310248194.2, Mailed Date: Jan. 13, 2016, 13 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130346669 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |