A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
This invention relates generally to the field of digital video and encryption thereof. More particularly, this invention relates to an encryption method and apparatus particularly useful for encrypting packetized video content such as that provided by cable and satellite television systems.
The above-referenced commonly owned patent applications describe inventions relating to various aspects of methods generally referred to herein as partial encryption or selective encryption. More particularly, systems- are described therein wherein selected portions of a particular selection of digital content (e.g., a television program) are encrypted using two (or more) encryption techniques while other portions of the content are left unencrypted. By properly selecting the portions to be encrypted, the content can effectively be encrypted for use under multiple decryption systems without the necessity of encryption of the entire selection of portions to be encrypted, the content can effectively be encrypted for use under multiple decryption systems without the necessity of encryption of the entire selection of content. In some embodiments, only a few percent of data overhead is needed to effectively encrypt the content using multiple encryption systems. This results in a cable or satellite system being able to utilize Set-top boxes (STBs) or other implementations of conditional access (CA) receivers from multiple manufacturers in a single system—thus freeing the cable or satellite company to competitively shop for providers of Set-top boxes.
The features of the invention believed to be novel are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention itself however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects and advantages thereof, may be best understood by reference to the following detailed description of the invention, which describes certain exemplary embodiments of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail specific embodiments, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an example of the principles of the invention and not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiments shown and described. In the description below, like reference numerals are used to describe the same, similar or corresponding parts in the several views of the drawings.
The terms “scramble” and “encrypt” and variations thereof are used synonymously herein. Also, the term “television program” and similar terms can be interpreted in the normal conversational sense, as well as a meaning wherein the term means any segment of AN content that can be displayed on a television set or similar monitor device. The term “video” is often used herein to embrace not only true visual information, but also in the conversational sense (e.g., “video tape recorder”) to embrace not only video signals but associated audio and data. The term “legacy” as used herein refers to existing technology used for existing package medium and broadcast, cable and satellite systems such as existing encryption technology used at the launch of such a system. The exemplary embodiments disclosed in the above applications and consistent with certain embodiments of the present invention are decoded by a television Set-Top Box (STB), but it is contemplated that such technology will soon be incorporated within television receivers of all types whether housed in a separate enclosure alone or in conjunction with recording and/or playback equipment or Conditional Access (CA) decryption module or within a television set itself. The present document generally uses the example of a “dual partial encryption” embodiment, but those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention can be utilized to realize multiple partial encryption without departing from the invention. Partial encryption and selective encryption are used synonymously herein. The term “package medium” and similar terms as used herein are intended to embrace a recording medium such as a Digital Versatile Disc (DVD), Compact Disc (CD) or other magnetic, optical or other recorded medium that is generally merchandised as a package that contains the electronic storage medium and is sold as a retail commodity, as contrasted to an electronically downloadable data stream.
In order to provide content control and protection for both broadcast content (whether by satellite, cable, pay-per-view or otherwise) as well as for packaged media such as Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs), various types of encryption are often utilized. Either the entire content is encrypted under a given encryption system using a particular encryption technique, or the content is partially encrypted using a particular encryption technique.
Unfortunately, as computing power grows, a single encryption technique or a given encryption key may be rendered ineffective in thwarting those who would attempt to pirate the protected content. This problem has been recognized in the satellite and cable industry where it is common to make changes to encryption keys on a regular basis. For example, it is common for such systems to change keys on a monthly basis. Moreover, although less frequent, it is occasionally advisable to upgrade the encryption process itself. By way of example, DES (Data Encryption Standard) encryption can be upgraded from 40 bit encryption to 56 bit encryption to 128 bit encryption, etc. to enhance the security of the encryption. Unfortunately, even with these key sizes, with today's desktop computing power, it is feasible to hack an encryption key by brute force. In another example, DES encryption can be upgraded to a more sophisticated encryption algorithm such as Triple DES, Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) or Common Scrambling Algorithm (CSA). When this happens, upgrading of the software within a television STB or equivalent device may require a software download or even a change in hardware.
Similarly, encryption techniques used in packaged media may be subject to being cracked by hackers and thus the security of the content compromised. Such is the case for the encryption algorithm originally released with the introduction of DVDs, which has been cracked and the decryption technique posted on the Internet. While the problem is substantial in the case of a content distributor such as a cable system operator, in the case of package media such as DVDs, the problem may even more complex since any encryption used in the packaged medium should be compatible with playback equipment from any of dozens of vendors (whereas, the cable or satellite system may be a closed environment with only one or a small limited number of approved vendors). Thus, until a generational change in encryption standards for the package medium can be made, the content may be compromised. Moreover, the user's existing content may become obsolete by any radical change in encryption introduced to prevent piracy. This may make it extremely difficult for equipment manufacturers to phase out equipment in favor of new equipment, since such changes might be rejected by the consumer. Thus, a transitional mechanism would be beneficial in order to make a transition to a new encryption standard which preserves the current encryption standard for a while, yet facilitates transition to a new standard.
In the above-referenced patent applications, a technique called dual partial encryption or dual selective encryption is described. In this technique, selective portions of video and/or audio content are encrypted while other portions are transmitted unencrypted (clear). By appropriate selection of the content to be encrypted, a very high level of security of the content can be maintained at the sacrifice of minimal amounts of overhead. Since the amount of encrypted content is a small percentage of the overall program content, that small portion can be duplicated and encrypted under several encryption schemes. This makes it possible to decode the program on multiple decoders using multiple decryption schemes. The various encrypted portions in the above applications are distinguished by use of multiple program identifiers (PIDs). The present invention extends this concept to use in upgrading of encryption techniques for both broadcast content and packaged media.
First consider the example of packaged media, and in particular for purposes of this example (but without limitation) DVDs. DVDs are currently partially encrypted with up to 25% of the overall content being encrypted and up to 50% of any one sector being encrypted. However, the selected VOBU (video object units—a packet definition for packets of 2048 bytes used in DVDs) which are currently encrypted are not necessarily optimally selected. As the above-referenced patent applications have illustrated, by optimal selection of the content to be encrypted, a much lower percentage of packets can be encrypted to still effectively render the content well protected. The selection of content to be encrypted can be any of the selections identified in the above-referenced patent applications, such as, for example without limitation, packets containing a video slice header, packets containing a video slice header appearing in an active region of a video frame, any packet carrying data representing an active region of a video frame, I Frame packets, packets containing motion vectors in a first P frame following an I Frame, packets having an intra_slice_flag indicator set, packets having an intra_slice indicator set, packets containing an intra_coded macroblock, packets that carry data for a slice containing an intra_coded macroblock, packets containing data from a first macroblock following the video slice header,packets containing video slice headers, packets containing anchor data, and P Frame packets for progressively refreshed video data, packets occurring in a star pattern approximately situated at approximately a center of an image, packets carrying data representing a pattern of horizontal stripes across an image, packets carrying data representing a pattern of vertical stripes across an image, packets carrying information that is needed to decode the content, packets carrying a payload that comprises a packetized elementary stream (PES) header, samples of the video content taken at prescribed sampling intervals, packets containing a specified elementary stream, and any other suitable packet selection criterion.
Once a collection of VOBUs (packets) are selected for encryption, the content is dual partial encrypted so that it has a clear portion, a portion encrypted using the old encryption process and a portion encrypted using the new encryption process. The dual partial encrypted video content is then stored on the DVD so that a first program chain references the clear portion and the portion encrypted using the old encryption process, and so that a second program chain references the clear portion and the portion encrypted using the new encryption process. Such alternative program chains are currently used in some DVDs to provide additional program content such as director cuts, different viewing angles, alternate plots and endings, and to provide parental control and alternative audio tracks. The majority of DVDs currently in production have only a single linear program chain.
A dual partially encrypted DVD (or other package medium such as a CD) can thus be used as a transitional medium to facilitate conversion to the new encryption format. Consider,
In this arrangement of
As applied to DVDs certain embodiments of the present invention would select Video Object Unit packets which are important to the decoding of the rest of the content. The Units chosen for encryption would be duplicated and scrambled with CSS and a new improved algorithm. A new type of program chain called “security” can be created that only the new players will understand and respond to. These would be similar to how parental rating program chains are managed. Older players will simply take the program chain containing CSS scrambled packets. New players would take the security program chain with the new algorithm packets.
The use of CSS encrypted packets in one program chain assures that new DVDs work in old DVD players. The duplicated and non-CSS scrambled packets will not interfere with the old players. The duplicated packets using the new encryption algorithm can be encoded as alternate track or program chain (PGC).
Thus, new players can be “forced” to take the program chain with the new encryption algorithm automatically. Like camera angle branches, branches for encryption would be tightly interleaved together. These would likely use Interleaved Blocks (ILVB). So, in the case of the arrangements depicted in
Once the marketplace has matured somewhat and the new encryption system is standard, DVD manufacturers can begin phasing out dual encrypted DVDs as shown in
Therefore, in accordance with certain embodiments consistent with the present invention, multiple replacement encryption algorithms can be used to produce packaged media such as DVDs so that each DVD contains multiple partially encrypted content. This will allow new players to actually phase out support for the older encryption algorithms since the older DVDs would already have the new algorithm encoded into them (even prior to marketing new players).
Thus, as described, a method of providing an upgrade for encryption used to encrypt video content stored in a Digital Versatile Disc (DVD) from an old encryption process to a new encryption process, consistent with certain embodiments of the invention, involves selecting a portion of video content for dual partial encryption; dual partial encrypting the video content so that the video content has a clear portion, a portion encrypted using the old encryption process and a portion encrypted using the new encryption process; storing the dual partial encrypted video content on the DVD so that a first program chain references the clear portion and the portion encrypted using the old encryption process, and so that a second program chain references the clear portion and the portion encrypted using the new encryption process.
Similarly, a method of providing an upgrade for encryption used for encryption of video content stored in package medium from an old encryption process to a new encryption process, consistent with certain embodiments of the invention, involves selecting a portion of video content for selective encryption; duplicating the selected portion of content to produce first and second copies of the selected portion; encrypting the first copy of the selected portion using the old encryption process; encrypting the second copy of the selected portion using the new encryption process; storing the portion of the video content which is not selected as clear content on the package medium; storing the encrypted first copy and the encrypted second copy of the selected portion on the package medium.
Thus, the transition path to a newer and more secure encryption method is depicted in
Consider now the application of dual partial encryption to the broadcast content industry. In the US cable and satellite markets, the Data Encryption Standard (DES) is primarily in use. DES is quickly becoming obsolete. The current standard version of DES as used by the cable and satellite industry generally uses a 56-bit key. With the rapidly increasing processing capabilities of PCs, decoding by a brute force trial of all possible keys with one or more computers, is rapidly becoming more feasible.
One of the most difficult things for a service provider to do is to upgrade the low level scrambling of a content delivery network. This is because of the installed base of decoders that perform decryption only based on the old encryption process and have no provision for upgrading the encryption. It is difficult for an operator to upgrade all the units in the field. This could potentially cost many millions of dollars. One possible solution is the use of Point of Deployment (POD) modules. When they are deployed, POD modules will provide one method of changing the low level scrambling used in a network. This is accomplished by wholesale replacement of all PODs in the network. However, even replacing POD modules can be costly, and this avenue is not available for decoders that do not support PODs. As of this date, PODs have only been deployed in limited numbers in the US cable market. Using current technology, new scrambling cannot be used until all the units or modules doing the old encryption are removed from the field. This is a logistical and financial problem as mentioned earlier. The invention allows new Set-top boxes and other decoding devices to be introduced without the need to make legacy STBs and other decoders obsolete. As an impetus to replace older units, the service operator may withhold new services to these devices, an thus compel the users to get new units (performing the new algorithm) to get the new services.
Accordingly, the progression for transition to a new encryption algorithm for cable and satellite operators (and similar content providers) is similar to that depicted in
Thus, in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention, a method of upgrading an encryption process for encryption of video information from an old encryption process to a new encryption process involves selecting a portion of video content for selective encryption; duplicating the selected portion of content to produce first and second copies of the selected portion; encrypting the first copy of the selected portion using the old encryption process; and encrypting the second copy of the selected portion using the new encryption process.
In order to achieve the desired dual partial encryption according to the present invention for making a transition between two encryption algorithms, a newly deployed decoder (e.g., a STB) is provided with a mechanism to distinguish the encrypted portions of the program material. This is accomplished in the manner described in the above-referenced patent applications. In one preferred method, the dual encrypted packets are distinguished by use of separate Program Identifiers (PIDs). That is, clear packets are identified by a first packet identifier. Dual encrypted packets are identified by a pair of PIDs that distinguish the new encryption system from the old. For example, PID 101 can be associated with clear packets as well as packets encrypted under the old encryption system. PID 102 can be used to identify packets encrypted under the new encryption system and is referred to as a secondary PID or shadow PID. The new STB is provided with the PIDs associated with the program and then decodes the program by ignoring encrypted packets with PID 101 in favor of encrypted packets with PID 102. This process is described in detail in the above-referenced patent applications.
In accordance with certain embodiments consistent with the present invention, a selectively encrypted digital video signal can be embodied in a carrier wave, that has a stream of packets of video data, wherein the stream of packets when not encrypted represent a segment of video content; certain of the packets being unencrypted and certain of the packets being encrypted under a legacy encryption method and certain of the packets being encrypted under a replacement encryption method; a first segment of code that identifies the unencrypted packets by a first packet identifier (PID); and a second segment of code that identifies the encrypted packets by a second packet identifier (PID).
An authorized Set-top box such as 100 illustrated in
In one embodiment of the case of package media consistent with the present invention, the decoder or player used to decode the content encrypted under the new encryption algorithm may be functionally identical to a conventional decoder or player except for the substitution of a different decrypter or different decryption algorithm. In other exemplary embodiments, the decoder or player can be designed to recognize newly encrypted program chains while ignoring program chains associated with the old encryption algorithm.
In other embodiments consistent with the present invention, a method of playback of content stored on a recording medium involves reading a portion of the recording medium to determine that the recording medium contains content containing portions encrypted under multiple encryption techniques; selecting content having portions encrypted under one of the multiple encryption techniques; and playing the content, wherein the playing comprises decrypting the encrypted portion of the content.
Thus, a method of upgrading an encryption process for encryption of video information from an old encryption process to a new encryption process, consistent with certain embodiments involves selecting a portion of video content for selective encryption. The selected portion is duplicated to produce first and second copies of the selected portion. The first copy is encrypted using the old encryption process and the second copy is encrypted using the new encryption process to produce a dual partially encrypted segment of video information that can either be broadcast over a cable or satellite system or stored in a package medium, for example, as two program chains.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention has been described in terms of exemplary embodiments based upon use of a programmed processor. However, the invention should not be so limited, since the present invention could be implemented using hardware component equivalents such as special purpose hardware and/or dedicated processors which are equivalents to the invention as described and claimed. Similarly, general purpose computers, microprocessor based computers, micro-controllers, optical computers, analog computers, dedicated processors and/or dedicated hard wired logic may be used to construct alternative equivalent embodiments of the present invention.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the program steps and associated data used to implement the embodiments described above can be implemented using disc storage as well as other forms of storage such as for example Read Only Memory (ROM) devices, Random Access Memory (RAM) devices; optical storage elements, magnetic storage elements, magneto-optical storage elements, flash memory, core memory and/or other equivalent storage technologies without departing from the present invention. Such alternative storage devices should be considered equivalents.
The present invention, as described in embodiments herein, is implemented using a programmed processor executing programming instructions that are broadly described above form that can be stored on any suitable electronic storage medium or transmitted over any suitable electronic communication medium or otherwise be present in any computer readable or propagation medium. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the processes described above can be implemented in any number of variations and in many suitable programming languages without departing from the present invention. For example, the order of certain operations carried out can often be varied, additional operations can be added or operations can be deleted without departing from the invention. Error trapping can be added and/or enhanced and variations can be made in user interface and information presentation without departing from the present invention. Such variations are contemplated and considered equivalent.
Software code and/or data embodying certain aspects of the present invention may be present in any computer readable medium, transmission medium, storage medium or propagation medium including, but not limited to, electronic storage devices such as those described above, as well as carrier waves, electronic signals, data structures (e.g., trees, linked lists, tables, packets, frames, etc.) optical signals, propagated signals, broadcast signals, transmission media (e.g., circuit connection, cable, twisted pair, fiber optic cables, waveguides, antennas, etc.) and other media that stores, carries or passes the code and/or data. Such media may either store the software code and/or data or serve to transport the code and/or data from one location to another. In the present exemplary embodiments, MPEG compliant packets, slices, tables and other data structures are used, but this should not be considered limiting since other data structures can similarly be used without departing from the present invention.
While the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, permutations and variations will become apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/409,675, filed Sep. 9, 2002 which is hereby incorporated by reference, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/037,914, filed Jan. 2, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,124,303 which claims priority of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/296,673 filed Jun. 6, 2001; 60/304,241, filed Jul. 10, 2001; and 60/304,131, filed Jul. 10, 2001. This application is related to patent applications entitled “Critical Packet Partial Encryption” to Unger et al., Ser. No. 10/038,217; patent applications entitled “Time Division Partial Encryption” to Candelore et al., Ser. No. 10/038,032; entitled “Partial Encryption and PID Mapping” to Unger et al., Ser. No. 10/037,499; and entitled “Decoding and Decrypting of Partially Encrypted Information” to Unger et al., Ser. No. 10/037,498 all of which were filed on Jan. 2, 2002. This application is also related to U.S. patent applications Ser. No. 10/273,905, filed Oct. 18, 2002 to Candelore et al. entitled “Video Slice and Active Region Based Dual Partial Encryption”, which is hereby incorporated by reference; Ser. No. 10/273,903, filed Oct. 18, 2002 to Candelore et al. entitled “Star Pattern Partial Encryption”; Ser. No. 10/274,084, filed Oct. 18, 2002 to Candelore et al. entitled “Slice Mask and Moat Pattern Partial Encryption”, and Ser. No. 10/274,019, filed Oct. 18, 2002 to Candelore et al. entitled “Video Scene Change Detection”. These applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3852519 | Court | Dec 1974 | A |
4381519 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4419693 | Wilkinson | Dec 1983 | A |
4521853 | Guttag | Jun 1985 | A |
4634808 | Moerder | Jan 1987 | A |
4700387 | Hirata | Oct 1987 | A |
4703351 | Kondo | Oct 1987 | A |
4703352 | Kondo | Oct 1987 | A |
4710811 | Kondo | Dec 1987 | A |
4712238 | Gilhousen et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4722003 | Kondo | Jan 1988 | A |
4739510 | Jeffers et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4772947 | Kondo | Sep 1988 | A |
4785361 | Brotby | Nov 1988 | A |
4788589 | Kondo | Nov 1988 | A |
4815078 | Shimura | Mar 1989 | A |
4845560 | Kondo et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4887296 | Horne | Dec 1989 | A |
4890161 | Kondo | Dec 1989 | A |
4914515 | Van Luyt | Apr 1990 | A |
4924310 | von Brandt | May 1990 | A |
4944006 | Citta et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953023 | Kondo | Aug 1990 | A |
4989245 | Bennett | Jan 1991 | A |
4995080 | Bestler et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5018197 | Jones et al. | May 1991 | A |
5023710 | Kondo et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5091938 | Katznelson | Feb 1992 | A |
5122873 | Golin | Jun 1992 | A |
5138659 | Kelkar et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142537 | Kutner et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5144662 | Welmer | Sep 1992 | A |
5144664 | Esserman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151782 | Ferraro | Sep 1992 | A |
5159452 | Kinoshita et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5196931 | Kondo | Mar 1993 | A |
5208816 | Seshardi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5237424 | Nishino et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237610 | Gammie et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241381 | Kondo | Aug 1993 | A |
5247575 | Sprague et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5258835 | Kato | Nov 1993 | A |
5319707 | Wasilewski et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5319712 | Finkelstein et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5325432 | Gardeck et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327502 | Katata | Jul 1994 | A |
5341425 | Wasilewski et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5359694 | Concordel | Oct 1994 | A |
5379072 | Kondo | Jan 1995 | A |
5381481 | Gammie et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398078 | Masuda et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400401 | Wasilewski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414852 | Kramer et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416651 | Uetake et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416847 | Boze | May 1995 | A |
5420866 | Wasilewski | May 1995 | A |
5428403 | Andrew et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5434716 | Sugiyama et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438369 | Citta et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444491 | Lim | Aug 1995 | A |
5444782 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455862 | Hoskinson | Oct 1995 | A |
5469216 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471501 | Parr et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473692 | Davis | Dec 1995 | A |
5481554 | Kondo | Jan 1996 | A |
5481627 | Kim | Jan 1996 | A |
5485577 | Eyer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491748 | Auld, Jr. et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5526427 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528608 | Shimizume | Jun 1996 | A |
5535276 | Ganesan | Jul 1996 | A |
5539823 | Martin | Jul 1996 | A |
5539828 | Davis | Jul 1996 | A |
5553141 | Lowry et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555305 | Robinson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561713 | Suh | Oct 1996 | A |
5568552 | Davis | Oct 1996 | A |
5574787 | Ryan | Nov 1996 | A |
5582470 | Yu | Dec 1996 | A |
5583576 | Perlman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583863 | Darr, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590202 | Bestler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598214 | Kondo et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600721 | Kitazato | Feb 1997 | A |
5606359 | Youden et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608448 | Smoral et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615265 | Coutrot | Mar 1997 | A |
5617333 | Oyamada et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625715 | Trew et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629981 | Nerlikar | May 1997 | A |
5652795 | Eillon et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5663764 | Kondo et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5666293 | Metz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5696906 | Peters et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699429 | Tamer et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703889 | Shimoda et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717814 | Abecassis | Feb 1998 | A |
5726702 | Hamaguchi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726711 | Boyce | Mar 1998 | A |
5732346 | Lazaridis et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742680 | Wilson | Apr 1998 | A |
5742681 | Giachetti et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751280 | Abbott et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751743 | Takizawa | May 1998 | A |
5751813 | Dorenbos | May 1998 | A |
5754650 | Katznelson | May 1998 | A |
5754658 | Aucsmith | May 1998 | A |
5757417 | Aras et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757909 | Park | May 1998 | A |
5768539 | Metz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796786 | Lee | Aug 1998 | A |
5796829 | Newby et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796840 | Davis | Aug 1998 | A |
5802176 | Audebert | Sep 1998 | A |
5805700 | Nardone et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805712 | Davis | Sep 1998 | A |
5805762 | Boyce et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809147 | De Lange et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815146 | Youden et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818934 | Cuccia | Oct 1998 | A |
5825879 | Davis | Oct 1998 | A |
5850218 | LaJoie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852290 | Chaney | Dec 1998 | A |
5852470 | Kondo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870474 | Wasiliewski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5894320 | Vancelette | Apr 1999 | A |
5894516 | Brandenburg | Apr 1999 | A |
5915018 | Aucsmith | Jun 1999 | A |
5917830 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922048 | Emura | Jul 1999 | A |
5923755 | Birch et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930361 | Hayashi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933500 | Blatter et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940738 | Rao | Aug 1999 | A |
5949877 | Traw et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949881 | Davis | Sep 1999 | A |
5963909 | Warren et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973679 | Abbott et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973722 | Wakai et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973726 | Iijima et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999622 | Yasukawa et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999698 | Nakai et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005561 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011849 | Orrin | Jan 2000 | A |
6012144 | Pickett | Jan 2000 | A |
6016348 | Blatter et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021199 | Ishibashi | Feb 2000 | A |
6021201 | Bakhle et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026164 | Sakamoto et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028932 | Park | Feb 2000 | A |
6049613 | Jakobsson | Apr 2000 | A |
6055314 | Spies et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055315 | Doyle et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057872 | Candelore | May 2000 | A |
6058186 | Enari | May 2000 | A |
6058192 | Guralnick et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061451 | Muratani et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064748 | Hogan | May 2000 | A |
6065050 | DeMoney | May 2000 | A |
6069647 | Sullivan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070245 | Murphy, Jr. et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072872 | Chang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6072873 | Bewick | Jun 2000 | A |
6073122 | Wool | Jun 2000 | A |
6088450 | Davis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105134 | Pinder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108422 | Newby et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115821 | Newby et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118873 | Lotspiech et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134237 | Brailean et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134551 | Aucsmith | Oct 2000 | A |
6138237 | Ruben et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148082 | Slattery et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154206 | Ludtke | Nov 2000 | A |
6157719 | Wasilewski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181334 | Freeman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185369 | Ko et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185546 | Davis | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189096 | Haverty | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192131 | Geer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199053 | Herbert et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204843 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209098 | Davis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215484 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222924 | Salomaki | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223290 | Larsen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226618 | Downs | May 2001 | B1 |
6229895 | Son et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230194 | Frailong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230266 | Perlman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236727 | Ciacelli et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240553 | Son et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246720 | Kutner et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256747 | Inohara et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263506 | Ezaki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266416 | Sigbjornsen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266480 | Ezaki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272538 | Holden et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278783 | Kocher et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289455 | Kocher et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292568 | Atkins, III et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292892 | Davis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307939 | Vigarie | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311012 | Cho et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324288 | Hoffman | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351538 | Uz | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351813 | Mooney et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6377589 | Knight et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378130 | Adams | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389533 | Davis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389537 | Davis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415031 | Colligan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415101 | deCarmo et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418169 | Datari | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424717 | Pinder et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430361 | Lee | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6445738 | Zdepski et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449718 | Rucklidge et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452923 | Gerszberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453115 | Boyle | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456985 | Ohtsuka | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459427 | Mao et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463152 | Takahashi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466671 | Maillard et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6505032 | McCorkle et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505299 | Zeng et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510554 | Gorden et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519693 | Debey | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526144 | Markandey et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6529526 | Schneidewend | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543053 | Li et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549229 | Kirby et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550008 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557031 | Mimura et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6587561 | Sered et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590979 | Ryan | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6640145 | Hoffberg et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640305 | Kocher et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650754 | Akiyama et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654389 | Brunheroto et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6678740 | Rakib et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681326 | Son et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684250 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6697489 | Candelore | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697944 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707696 | Turner et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714650 | Maillard et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6754276 | Harumoto et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772340 | Peinado et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788690 | Harri | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6788882 | Geer et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6826185 | Montanaro et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6883050 | Safadi | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891565 | Dietrich | May 2005 | B1 |
6895128 | Bohnenkamp | May 2005 | B2 |
6904520 | Rosset et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917684 | Tatebayashi et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6936152 | Nagai et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938162 | Nagai et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6976166 | Herley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7039802 | Eskicioglu et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7039938 | Candelore | May 2006 | B2 |
7065213 | Pinder | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096481 | Forecast et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7120250 | Candelore | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124303 | Candelore | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127619 | Unger et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139396 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139398 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146007 | Maruo et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7151831 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151833 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155012 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20010030959 | Ozawa et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036271 | Javed | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051000 | Teshima | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010051007 | Teshima | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003881 | Reitmeier et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020021805 | Schumann et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026587 | Talstra et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020046406 | Chelehmal et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047915 | Misu | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059425 | Belfiore et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066101 | Gordon et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083317 | Ohta et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083438 | So et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097322 | Monroe et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020108035 | Herley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116705 | Perlman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126890 | Katayama et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129243 | Nanjundiah | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144260 | Devara | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150239 | Carny et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020157115 | Lu | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020157116 | Lu | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164022 | Strasser et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170053 | Peterka et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184508 | Perlman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194613 | Unger | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196939 | Unger et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002854 | Belknap et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009669 | White et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012286 | Ishtiaq et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021412 | Candelore et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026423 | Unger et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030026523 | Unger et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028879 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035482 | Klompenhouwer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035540 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035543 | Gillon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046686 | Candelore et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046687 | Hodges et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059047 | Iwamura | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063615 | Luoma et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072555 | Yap et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077071 | Lin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081630 | Mowery et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081776 | Candelore | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084284 | Ando et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097662 | Russ et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112333 | Chen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118243 | Sezer et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123664 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030123849 | Nallur et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126086 | Safadi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133570 | Candelore et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140257 | Peterka et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145329 | Candelore | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152224 | Candelore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152226 | Candelore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156718 | Candelore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159139 | Candelore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159140 | Candelore | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159152 | Lin et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174837 | Candelore et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174844 | Candelore | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188154 | Dallard | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030188164 | Okimoto et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190054 | Troyansky et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193973 | Takashimizu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198223 | Mack et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204717 | Kuehnel | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030222994 | Dawson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030226149 | Chun et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228018 | Vince | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003008 | Wasilewski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010717 | Simec et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021764 | Driscoll, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028227 | Yu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047470 | Candelore | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049688 | Candelore et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049690 | Candelore et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049691 | Candelore et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049694 | Candelore | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064688 | Jacobs | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068659 | Diehl | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073917 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078575 | Morten et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081333 | Grab et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086127 | Candelore | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088552 | Candelore | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088558 | Candelore | May 2004 | A1 |
20040091109 | Son et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100510 | Milic-Frayling et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040123094 | Sprunk | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136532 | Pinder et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139337 | Pinder et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151314 | Candelore | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158721 | Candelore | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165586 | Read et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172650 | Hawkins et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181666 | Candelore | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187161 | Cao | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193550 | Siegal | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040240668 | Bonan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040247122 | Hobrock et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261099 | Durden et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267602 | Gaydos et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004875 | Kontio et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028193 | Candelore et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036067 | Ryal et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050063541 | Candelore | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066357 | Ryal | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071669 | Medvinsky et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050094808 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050094809 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097596 | Pedlow, Jr. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097597 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097598 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097614 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102702 | Candelore et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129233 | Pedlow, Jr. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141713 | Genevois | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050169473 | Candelore | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192904 | Candelore | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198586 | Sekiguchi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050259813 | Wasilewski et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265470 | Strasser et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050265547 | Strasser et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060115083 | Candelore et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060130119 | Candelore et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060130121 | Candelore et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136976 | Coupe et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060153379 | Candelore et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168616 | Candelore | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174264 | Candelore | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060262926 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269060 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0471373 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0527611 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0558016 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0596826 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0610587 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0680209 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0674440 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0674441 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0833517 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0866615 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1 187 483 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1187483 | Mar 2002 | EP |
7067028 | Mar 1995 | JP |
11243534 | Oct 2002 | JP |
WO 8607224 | Dec 1986 | WO |
WO 9410775 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9738530 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 0031964 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0165762 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0178386 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0178386 | Oct 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040049688 A1 | Mar 2004 | US | |
20070271470 A9 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60409675 | Sep 2002 | US | |
60296673 | Jun 2001 | US | |
60304241 | Jul 2001 | US | |
60304131 | Jul 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10037914 | Jan 2002 | US |
Child | 10293761 | US |