Disclosed are methods for upgrading petroleum. Specifically, disclosed are methods and systems for upgrading petroleum using pretreatment processes.
Chemical production is a primary consumer of crude oil. Traditionally, straight run naphtha (naphtha being a mixture of hydrocarbons having boiling points less than 200 degrees Celsius (deg C.)) can be used for steam cracking to produce ethylene and propylene, because straight run naphtha contains a greater hydrogen content relative to other feedstocks. In addition, straight run naphtha typically produces limited amounts of hydrocarbons containing more than 10 carbon atoms, also called pyrolysis fuel oil, on the order of 3 weight percent (wt %) to 6 wt % of the total product. Heavier feedstocks, such as vacuum gas oil, can be processed in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit to produce propylene and ethylene. While an FCC unit can result in the production of high octane-rating gasoline blend stock, it is limited in conversion of feedstock into ethylene and propylene.
Other feedstocks, such as gas oil with a boiling point of greater than 200 deg C., can be used in steam cracking processes, but can result in a lower yield of ethylene and propylene, as well as an increased coking rate due to the heavy molecules in the gas oil fraction. Thus, gas oil fractions do not make suitable feeds for steam cracking processes.
Expanding feedstocks for steam cracking processes to include whole range crude oil or residue fractions is problematic because of the presence of large molecules such as asphaltene in the feedstock. Heavy molecules, particularly, polyaromatic compounds, tend to form coke in the pyrolysis tube and cause fouling in the transfer line exchanger (TLE). A coke layer in the pyrolysis tube can inhibit heat transfer and can cause physical failure of the pyrolysis tube. Severe coking can shorten the run time of the steam cracker, which is one of the most critical parameters in managing the economics of a steam cracker. As a result, the advantage of using cheaper feedstocks, crude oil and heavy residue streams, can be depleted by a short run length of the steam cracking plant. It should be noted that when starting with whole range crude oil or residue fractions the amount of pyrolysis fuel oil can be between 20 wt % and 30 wt % of the total product stream.
Gas oil fractions can be pre-treated in one or more pre-treatment approaches, such as hydrotreatment processes, thermal conversion processes, extraction processes, and distillation processes. Thermal conversion processes can include coking processes and visbreaking processes. Extraction processes can include solvent deasphalting processes. Distillation processes can include atmospheric distillation or vacuum distillation processes. The pre-treatment approaches can decrease the heavy residue fractions, such as the atmospheric residue fraction and the vacuum residue fractions. Thus, decreasing the heavy residue fractions in the feed to the steam cracking feedstock can improve the efficiency of the steam cracking feedstock.
These pre-treatment approaches can process the whole range crude oil before introducing the pre-treated process to the steam cracking process. The pre-treatment approaches can increase light olefin yield and reduce coking in a steam cracking processes. The pre-treatment approaches can increase the hydrogen content of the steam cracking feed—hydrogen content is related to light olefin yield such that the greater the hydrogen content the greater the light olefin yield.
The pre-treatment approaches can decrease the content of heteroatoms, such as sulfur and metals. Sulfur compounds can suppress carbon monoxide formation in a steam cracking process by passivating an inner surface of the pyrolysis tubes. In one approach, 20 wt ppm dimethyl sulfide can be added to a sulfur-free feedstock. However, sulfur content greater than 400 wt ppm in the feedstock to a steam crack process can increase the coking rate in the pyrolysis tubes.
While the pre-treatment approaches can increase the efficiency of a steam cracking process, the pre-treatment approaches also have several drawbacks. First, a hydrotreating process can require a large capital investment and does not remove all undesired compounds, such as asphaltenes. Second, the use of a pre-treatment approach, such as coking, extraction, and distillation, can result in low liquid yield for the feed to the steam cracking process because an amount of the feed is rejected as residue. Third, pre-treatment approaches can require extensive maintenance due to deactivation of catalyst caused by coking, asphaltene deposition, catalyst poisoning, fouling, and sintering of the active species. Finally, many of the pre-treatment processes reject the heaviest fractions of the streams, which reduces overall yield of light olefins and impacts a parameter influence economics of the steam cracker.
Disclosed are methods for upgrading petroleum. Specifically, disclosed are methods and systems for upgrading petroleum using pretreatment processes.
In a first aspect, a method for producing alkene gases from a cracked product effluent is provided. The method includes the steps of introducing the cracked product effluent to a fractionator unit, the fractionator unit configured to separate the cracked product effluent, separating the cracked product effluent in the fractionator to produce a cracked light stream and a cracked residue stream, where the cracked light stream includes the alkene gases, where the alkene gases are selected from the group consisting of ethylene, propylene, butylene, and combinations of the same, introducing the cracked residue stream and a heavy feed to a heavy mixer, mixing the cracked residue stream and the heavy feed in the heavy mixer to produce a combined supercritical process feed, introducing the combined supercritical process feed and a water feed to a supercritical water process, the supercritical water process configured to upgrade the combined supercritical process feed, and upgrading the combined supercritical process feed in the supercritical water process to produce a supercritical water process (SWP)-treated light product and a SWP-treated heavy product, where the SWP-treated heavy product includes reduced amounts of olefins and asphaltenes relative to the cracked residue stream such that the SWP-treated heavy product exhibits increased stability relative to the cracked residue stream.
In certain aspects the method further includes the steps of introducing a crude oil feed and a hydrogen feed to a hydrogen addition process, the hydrogen addition process configured to facilitate hydrogenation of hydrocarbons in the crude oil feed, where the hydrogen addition process includes a hydrogenation catalyst, where the hydrogenation catalyst is operable to catalyze hydrotreating reactions, allowing the hydrocarbons in the crude oil feed to undergo the hydrotreating reactions in the hydrogen addition process to produce a hydrogen-added stream, where the hydrogen-added stream includes paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, light gases, and combinations of the same, introducing the hydrogen-added stream to a separator unit, the separator unit configured to separate the hydrogen-added stream, separating the hydrogen-added stream in the separator unit to produce a light feed and the heavy feed, where the light feed includes hydrocarbons with boiling points of less than 650 deg F., where the heavy feed includes hydrocarbons with boiling points of greater than 650 deg F., introducing the light feed and the SWP-treated light product to a light mixer, mixing the light feed with the SWP-treated light product in the light mixer to produce a combined steam cracking feed, introducing the combined steam cracking feed to a steam cracking process, the steam cracking process configured to thermally crack the combined steam cracking feed in the presence of steam, and allowing thermal cracking to occur in the steam cracking process to produce the cracked product effluent.
In certain aspects the method further includes the steps of introducing a crude oil feed and a hydrogen feed to a hydrogen addition process, the hydrogen addition process configured to facilitate hydrogenation of hydrocarbons in the crude oil feed, where the hydrogen addition process includes a hydrogenation catalyst, where the hydrogenation catalyst is operable to catalyze hydrotreating reactions, allowing the hydrocarbons in the crude oil feed to undergo the hydrotreating reactions in the hydrogen addition process to produce a hydrogen-added stream, where the hydrogen-added stream includes paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, and light gases, introducing the hydrogen-added stream and the SWP-treated light product to a feed mixer, mixing the light feed with the SWP-treated light product in the feed mixer to produce a combined separator feed, introducing the combined separator feed to a separator unit, the separator unit configured to separate the combined separator feed, separating the combined separator feed in the separator unit to produce a light feed and the heavy feed, where the light feed includes hydrocarbons with boiling points of less than 650 deg F., where the heavy feed includes hydrocarbons with boiling points of greater than 650 deg F., introducing the light feed to a steam cracking process, the steam cracking process configured to thermally crack the light feed in the presence of steam, and allowing thermal cracking to occur in the steam cracking process to produce the cracked product effluent.
In certain aspects the method further includes the steps of separating light gases from the cracked product effluent in the fractionator unit to produce a recovered hydrogen stream, where the recovered hydrogen stream includes hydrogen, and introducing the recovered hydrogen stream to the heavy mixer, such that the combined supercritical water feed includes hydrogen.
In certain aspects, an API gravity of the crude oil feed is between 15 and 50, where an atmospheric fraction of the crude oil feed is between 10 vol % and 60 vol %, where a vacuum fraction is between 1 vol % and 35 vol %, where an asphaltene fraction is between 0.1 wt % and 15 wt %, and where a total sulfur content is between 2.5 vol % and 26 vol %. In certain aspects, the hydrogenation catalyst includes a transition metal sulfide supported on an oxide support, where the transition metal sulfide is selected from the group consisting of cobalt-molybdenum sulfide (CoMoS), nickel-molybdenum sulfide (NiMoS), nickel-tungsten sulfide (NiWS) and combinations of the same. In certain aspects, the hydrotreating reactions are selected from the group consisting of hydrogenation reactions, hydrogenative dissociation reactions, hydrogenative cracking reactions, isomerization reactions, alkylation reactions, upgrading reactions, and combinations of the same. In certain aspects, the cracked residue stream includes hydrocarbons having a boiling point greater than 200 deg C.
In a second aspect, a method for producing alkene gases from a cracked product effluent is provided, the method includes the steps of introducing the cracked product effluent to a fractionator unit, the fractionator unit configured to separate the cracked product effluent, separating the cracked product effluent in the fractionator to produce a cracked light stream and a cracked residue stream, where the cracked light stream includes the alkene gases, where the alkene gases are selected from the group consisting of ethylene, propylene, butylene, and combinations of the same, introducing the cracked residue stream and a distillate residue stream to a heavy mixer, mixing the cracked residue stream and the distillate residue stream in the heavy mixer to produce a combined residue stream, introducing the combined residue stream and a water feed to a supercritical water process, the supercritical water process configured to upgrade the combined residue stream, and upgrading the combined residue stream in the supercritical water process to produce a supercritical water process (SWP)-treated light product and a SWP-treated heavy product, where the SWP-treated heavy product includes reduced amounts of olefins and asphaltenes relative to the cracked residue stream such that the SWP-treated heavy product exhibits increased stability relative to the cracked residue stream.
In certain aspects, the method further includes the steps of introducing a crude oil feed to a distillation unit, the distillation unit configured to separate the crude oil feed, separating the crude oil feed in the distillation unit to produce a distillate stream and the distillate residue stream, where the distillate stream includes hydrocarbons with boiling points less than 650 deg F., introducing the distillate stream to a hydrogen addition process, the hydrogen addition process configured to facilitate hydrogenation of hydrocarbons in the distillate stream, where the hydrogen addition process includes a hydrogenation catalyst, where the hydrogenation catalyst is operable to catalyze hydrotreating reactions, allowing the hydrocarbons in the distillate stream to undergo the hydrotreating reactions in the hydrogen addition process to produce a hydrogen-added stream, where the hydrogen-added stream includes paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, light gases, and combinations of the same, introducing the hydrogen-added stream and the SWP-treated light product to a feed mixer, mixing the hydrogen-added stream with the SWP-treated light product in the feed mixer to produce a combined separator feed, introducing the combined separator feed to a steam cracking process, the steam cracking process configured to thermally crack the combined separator feed in the presence of steam, and allowing thermal cracking to occur in the steam cracking process to produce the cracked product effluent.
In certain aspects the method further includes the steps of introducing a crude oil feed to a distillation unit, the distillation unit configured to separate the crude oil feed, separating the crude oil feed in the distillation unit to produce a distillate stream and the distillate residue stream, where the distillate stream includes hydrocarbons with boiling points less than 650 deg F., introducing the distillate stream and the SWP-treated light product to a distillate mixer, mixing the distillate stream with the SWP-treated light product in the distillate mixer to produce a combined distillate stream, introducing the combined distillate stream to a hydrogen addition process, the hydrogen addition process configured to facilitate hydrogenation of hydrocarbons in the combined distillate stream, where the hydrogen addition process includes a hydrogenation catalyst, where the hydrogenation catalyst is operable to catalyze hydrotreating reactions, allowing the hydrocarbons in the combined distillate stream to undergo the hydrotreating reactions in the hydrogen addition process to produce a hydrogen-added stream, where the hydrogen-added stream includes paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, light gases, and combinations of the same, introducing the hydrogen-added stream to a steam cracking process, the steam cracking process configured to thermally crack the hydrogen-added stream in the presence of steam, and allowing thermal cracking to occur in the steam cracking process to produce the cracked product effluent.
In a third aspect, a method for producing alkene gases from a cracked product effluent is provided. The method includes the steps of introducing the cracked product effluent to a fractionator unit, the fractionator unit configured to separate the cracked product effluent, separating the cracked product effluent in the fractionator to produce a cracked light stream and a cracked residue stream, where the cracked light stream includes the alkene gases, where the alkene gases are selected from the group consisting of ethylene, propylene, butylene, and combinations of the same, introducing the cracked residue stream and a hydrogen-added stream to a heavy mixer, mixing the cracked residue stream and the hydrogen-added stream in the heavy mixer to produce a mixed stream, introducing the mixed stream and a water feed to a supercritical water process, the supercritical water process configured to upgrade the mixed stream, and upgrading the mixed stream in the supercritical water process to produce a supercritical water process (SWP)-treated light product and a SWP-treated heavy product, where the SWP-treated heavy product includes reduced amounts of olefins and asphaltenes relative to the cracked residue stream such that the SWP-treated heavy product exhibits increased stability relative to the cracked residue stream.
In certain aspect, the method further includes the steps of introducing a crude oil feed to a distillation unit, the distillation unit configured to separate the crude oil feed, separating the crude oil feed in the distillation unit to produce a distillate stream and a distillate residue stream, where the distillate stream includes hydrocarbons with boiling points of less than 650 deg F., introducing the distillate stream and the SWP-treated light product to a distillate mixer, mixing the distillate stream with the SWP-treated light product in the distillate mixer to produce a combined distillate stream, introducing the combined distillate stream to a steam cracking process, the steam cracking process configured to thermally crack the combined distillate stream in the presence of steam, allowing thermal cracking to occur in the steam cracking process to produce the cracked product effluent, introducing the distillate residue stream to a hydrogen addition process, the hydrogen addition process configured to facilitate hydrogenation of hydrocarbons in the distillate residue stream, where the hydrogen addition process includes a hydrogenation catalyst, where the hydrogenation catalyst is operable to catalyze hydrotreating reactions, and allowing the hydrocarbons in the distillate residue stream to undergo the hydrotreating reactions in the hydrogen addition process to produce the hydrogen-added stream, where the hydrogen-added stream includes paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, light gases, and combinations of the same.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the scope will become better understood with regard to the following descriptions, claims, and accompanying drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only several embodiments and are therefore not to be considered limiting of the scope as it can admit to other equally effective embodiments.
In the accompanying Figures, similar components or features, or both, may have a similar reference label.
While the scope of the apparatus and method will be described with several embodiments, it is understood that one of ordinary skill in the relevant art will appreciate that many examples, variations and alterations to the apparatus and methods described here are within the scope and spirit of the embodiments.
Accordingly, the embodiments described are set forth without any loss of generality, and without imposing limitations, on the embodiments. Those of skill in the art understand that the scope includes all possible combinations and uses of particular features described in the specification.
The processes and systems described are directed to upgrading crude oil feedstocks. The process provides methods and apparatus for upgrading heavy fractions from a steam cracking process. The process provides methods and apparatus for producing light olefins.
Advantageously, the upgrading processes described here can increase the overall efficiency of the steam cracking process by cracking heavy fractions, such as asphaltenes, before the heavy fractions are introduced to the steam cracking process, where such heavy fractions are not suitable for a steam cracking process. Advantageously, the upgrading process increases the overall efficiency of producing light olefins from a whole range crude oil. Advantageously, the upgrading processes described here increase the overall efficiency of the steam cracking process by upgrading the heavy fractions from the steam cracking process. The incorporation of a supercritical water process can upgrade the heavy fractions from the steam cracking process allowing the supercritical treated stream to be reintroduced to the steam cracker. Advantageously, the incorporation of a supercritical water process can increase the liquid yield compared to conventional thermal processes, because supercritical water processes suppress solid coke formation and gas formation. Advantageously, the incorporation of a supercritical water process can crack and depolymerize asphaltenes and reduce the stress on the hydrotreating unit to prevent severe deactivation in the hydrotreating unit, which can increase catalyst life cycle and reduce catalyst maintenance.
As used throughout, “external supply of hydrogen” refers to the addition of hydrogen to the feed to the reactor or to the reactor itself. For example, a reactor in the absence of an external supply of hydrogen means that the feed to the reactor and the reactor are in the absence of added hydrogen, gas (H2) or liquid, such that no hydrogen (in the form H2) is a feed or a part of a feed to the reactor.
As used throughout, “external supply of catalyst” refers to the addition of catalyst to the feed to the reactor or the presence of a catalyst in the reactor, such as a fixed bed catalyst in the reactor. For example, a reactor in the absence of an external supply of catalyst means no catalyst has been added to the feed to the reactor and the reactor does not contain a catalyst bed in the reactor.
As used throughout, “atmospheric fraction” or “atmospheric residue fraction” refers to the fraction of oil-containing streams having a T10% of 650 deg F., such that 90% of the volume of hydrocarbons have boiling points greater than 650 deg F. and includes the vacuum residue fraction. An atmospheric fraction can include distillates from an atmospheric distillation.
As used throughout, “vacuum fraction” or “vacuum residue fraction refers to the fraction of oil-containing streams having a T10% of 1050 deg F.
As used throughout, “asphaltene” refers to the fraction of an oil-containing stream which is not soluble in a n-alkane, particularly, n-heptane.
As used throughout, “light hydrocarbons” refers to hydrocarbons with less than 9 carbon atoms (C9− hydrocarbons).
As used throughout, “heavy hydrocarbons” refers to hydrocarbons having 9 or more carbon atoms (C9+).
As used throughout, “hydrogenation” refers to adding hydrogen to hydrocarbon compounds.
As used throughout, “coke” refers to the toluene insoluble material present in petroleum.
As used throughout, “cracking” refers to the breaking of hydrocarbons into smaller ones containing few carbon atoms due to the breaking of carbon-carbon bonds.
As used throughout, “heteroatoms” refers to sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, and metals occurring alone or as heteroatom-hydrocarbon compounds.
As used throughout, “upgrade” means one or all of increasing API gravity, decreasing the amount of heteroatoms, decreasing the amount of asphaltene, decreasing the amount of the atmospheric fraction, increasing the amount of light fractions, decreasing the viscosity, and combinations of the same, in a process outlet stream relative to the process feed stream. One of skill in the art understands that upgrade can have a relative meaning such that a stream can be upgraded in comparison to another stream, but can still contain undesirable components such as heteroatoms.
As used throughout, “conversion reactions” refers to reactions that can upgrade a hydrocarbon stream including cracking, isomerization, alkylation, dimerization, aromatization, cyclization, desulfurization, denitrogenation, deasphalting, and demetallization.
As used throughout, “stable” or “stability” refers to the quality of the hydrocarbon and the ability of the hydrocarbon to resist degradation, oxidation, and contamination. Hydrocarbon stability is related to the amount of asphaltene and olefins, specially diolefins, present in the hydrocarbon. Increased amounts of asphaltene and olefins results in a less stable oil because asphaltenes and olefins are more susceptible to degradation, oxidation, and contamination. Stability is generally measured by ASTM 7060 for fuel oil and ASTM D381 for gasoline (gum formation). Stability includes storage stability.
As used throughout, “distillate” refers to hydrocarbons having a boiling point lower than 650 deg F. Distillate can include the distillable materials from an atmospheric distillation process. Examples of hydrocarbons in the distillate can include naphtha, gasoline, kerosene, diesel, and combinations of the same.
The following embodiments, provided with reference to the figures, describe the upgrading process.
Referring to
Separator unit 100 can be any type of unit capable of fractionating a whole range crude oil into two or more streams based on a boiling point or boiling point range of those streams. Examples of separator unit 100 can include a distillation unit, a flashing column, and combinations of the same. The operating conditions of separator unit 100 can be selected based on the desired number and composition of the separated streams. The desired composition of the separated stream can be based on the operating unit downstream of separator unit 100. Separator unit 100 can separate crude oil feed 5 to produce light feed 10 and heavy feed 15.
Light feed 10 can contain hydrocarbons with boiling points of less than 650 deg F. In at least one embodiment, light feed 10 is in the absence of asphaltene. The operating conditions of separator unit 100 can produce light feed 10 that has an increased amount of paraffins compared to crude oil feed 5, making light feed 10 suitable as a direct feed to a steam cracking process. Increased paraffins yields an increase in olefins in a steam cracking process. Advantageously, the reduced boiling points of light feed 10 reduces the tendency to form coke in a steam cracking process, compared to a fluid with greater boiling points.
Heavy feed 15 can contain hydrocarbons with a boiling point greater than 650 deg F.
Light feed 10 can be introduced to light mixer 110. Light mixer 110 can be any type of mixing equipment capable of mixing two or more hydrocarbon streams. Light mixer 110 can include inline mixers, static mixers, mixing valves, and stirred tank mixers. Light feed 10 can be mixed with supercritical water process (SWP)-treated light product 50 in light mixer 110 to produce combined steam cracking feed 20.
Combined steam cracking feed 20 can be introduced to steam cracking process 200. Steam cracking process 200 can be any process capable of thermal cracking a hydrocarbon stream in the presence of steam. Steam can be used to dilute hydrocarbons for increasing olefin formation and reducing coke formation. Steam cracking process 200 can include cracking furnaces, cracking tubes, heat exchangers, compressors, refrigerating systems, gas separation units, and other steam cracking equipment. Steam cracking process 200 can include free radical reactions, which can be characterized by a large number of chain reactions.
Steam cracking process 200 can produce cracked product effluent 25. Cracked product effluent 25 can be introduced to fractionator unit 300.
Fractionator unit 300 can be any type of unit capable of fractionating cracked product effluent 25 into two or more streams. Examples of fractionator unit 300 can include distillation units, flashing columns, quenching units, dehydrating units, acid gas treatment, refrigerating units, and combinations of the same. The operating conditions of fractionator unit 300 can be selected based on the desired number and composition of the separated streams. In at least one embodiment, fractionator unit 300 can include a quenching unit, a dehydrating unit, and acid gas treatment to remove hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide, followed by a chiller unit, where the gases stream can be chilled to about −140 deg C. and −160 deg C. by a refrigerating unit to condense the alkene gases, which separates the alkene gases from the light gases. Fractionator unit 300 can separate cracked product effluent 25 to produce cracked light stream 30 and cracked residue stream 35.
Cracked light stream 30 can include light gases, alkene gases, light hydrocarbons, and combinations of the same. Light gases can include hydrogen, carbon monoxide, oxygen, and combinations of the same. The light gases can include between 80 mole percent (mol %) and 95 mol %. Alkene gases can include ethylene, propylene, butylene, and combinations of the same. The composition of cracked light stream 30 can depend on the composition of crude oil feed 5, the units included in the upgrading process, and the reactions occurring in each unit of the upgrading process. The hydrogen content in crude oil feed 5 can be between 0.1 wt % and 1 wt %. The carbon monoxide content in cracked product effluent 25 can be between 100 parts-per-million by weight (wt ppm) and 1,000 wt ppm.
Cracked light stream 30 can be used as a product stream, sent to storage, further processed, or blended in a downstream process. Further processing can include separating cracked light stream 30 to produce a purified ethylene stream, a purified propylene stream, a purified mixed ethylene and propylene stream, mixed butanes, and combinations of the same.
Cracked residue stream 35 can include hydrocarbons having a boiling point greater than 200 deg C. In at least one embodiment, cracked residue stream 35 includes olefins, aromatics, asphaltene, heteroatoms, and combinations of the same. Heteroatoms can include nitrogen compounds, vanadium, iron, chloride, oxygenates, non-hydrocarbon particulates, and combinations of the same. In at least one embodiment, cracked residue stream 35 can include hydrocarbons containing ten or more carbons (C10+ hydrocarbons). In at least one embodiment, cracked residue stream 35 includes pyrolysis fuel oil. Cracked residue stream 35 can be introduced to heavy mixer 120.
Heavy mixer 120 can be any type of mixing unit capable of mixing two or more hydrocarbon streams. Examples of heavy mixer 120 can include inline geometrical mixers, static mixers, mixing valves, and stirred tank mixers. Cracked residue stream 35 can be mixed with heavy feed 15 to produce combined supercritical process feed 40.
Combined supercritical process feed 40 can be introduced to supercritical water process 400 along water feed 45. Water feed 45 can be a demineralized water having a conductivity less than 1.0 microSiemens per centimeter (μS/cm), alternately less 0.5 μS/cm, and alternately less than 0.1 μS/cm. In at least one embodiment, water feed 45 is demineralized water having a conductivity less than 0.1 μS/cm. Water feed 45 can have a sodium content less than 5 micrograms per liter (μg/L) and alternately less than 1 μg/L. Water feed 45 can have a chloride content less than 5 μg/L and alternately less than 1 μg/L. Water feed 45 can have a silica content less than 3 μg/L.
Cracked residue stream 35 can be unstable due to the presence of olefins and asphaltenes making it unsuitable as a fuel oil stream without removal of the olefins, including diolefins. Supercritical water process 400 can convert olefins and diolefins in combined supercritical water process feed 40 into aromatics and can remove asphaltenes. Advantageously, treating cracked residue stream 35 in supercritical water process 400 increases the yield of crude oil feed 5. Treating cracked residue stream 35 in supercritical water process 400 improves the stability of the hydrocarbons in SWP-treated heavy product 55 as compared to the hydrocarbons in cracked residue stream 35. Advantageously, treating cracked residue stream 35 converts low value hydrocarbons to higher value hydrocarbons increasing the overall value of the crude oil feed.
Supercritical water process 400 can be any type of hydrocarbon upgrading unit that facilitates reaction of hydrocarbons in the presence of supercritical water. Supercritical water process can include reactors, heat exchangers, pumps, separators, pressure control system, and other equipment. Supercritical water process 400 can include one or more reactors, where the reactors operate at a temperature between 380 deg C. and 450 deg C., a pressure between 22 MPa and 30 MPa, a residence time between 1 minute and 60 minutes, and a water to oil ratio between 1:10 and 1:0.1 vol/vol at standard ambient temperature and pressure. In at least one embodiment, supercritical water process 400 can be in the absence of an external supply of hydrogen. Supercritical water process 400 can be in the absence of an external supply of catalyst.
It is known in the art that hydrocarbon reactions in supercritical water upgrade heavy oil and crude oil containing sulfur compounds to produce products that have lighter fractions. Supercritical water has unique properties making it suitable for use as a petroleum reaction medium where the reaction objectives can include conversion reactions, desulfurization reactions denitrogenation reactions, and demetallization reactions. Supercritical water is water at a temperature at or greater than the critical temperature of water and at a pressure at or greater than the critical pressure of water. The critical temperature of water is 373.946° C. The critical pressure of water is 22.06 megapascals (MPa). Advantageously, at supercritical conditions water acts as both a hydrogen source and a solvent (diluent) in conversion reactions, desulfurization reactions and demetallization reactions and a catalyst is not needed. Hydrogen from the water molecules is transferred to the hydrocarbons through direct transfer or through indirect transfer, such as the water-gas shift reaction. In the water-gas shift reaction, carbon monoxide and water react to produce carbon dioxide and hydrogen. The hydrogen can be transferred to hydrocarbons in desulfurization reactions, demetallization reactions, denitrogenation reactions, and combinations of the same. The hydrogen can also reduce the olefin content. The production of an internal supply of hydrogen can reduce coke formation.
Without being bound to a particular theory, it is understood that the basic reaction mechanism of supercritical water mediated petroleum processes is the same as a free radical reaction mechanism. Radical reactions include initiation, propagation, and termination steps. With hydrocarbons, especially heavy molecules such as C10+, initiation is the most difficult step and conversion in supercritical water can be limited due to the high activation energy required for initiation. Initiation requires the breaking of chemical bonds. The bond energy of carbon-carbon bonds is about 350 kJ/mol, while the bond energy of carbon-hydrogen is about 420 kJ/mol. Due to the chemical bond energies, carbon-carbon bonds and carbon-hydrogen bonds do not break easily at the temperatures in a supercritical water process, 380 deg C. to 450 deg C., without catalyst or radical initiators. In contrast, aliphatic carbon-sulfur bonds have a bond energy of about 250 kJ/mol. The aliphatic carbon-sulfur bond, such as in thiols, sulfide, and disulfides, has a lower bond energy than the aromatic carbon-sulfur bond.
Thermal energy creates radicals through chemical bond breakage. Supercritical water creates a “cage effect” by surrounding the radicals. The radicals surrounded by water molecules cannot react easily with each other, and thus, intermolecular reactions that contribute to coke formation are suppressed. The cage effect suppresses coke formation by limiting inter-radical reactions. Supercritical water, having low dielectric constant, dissolves hydrocarbons and surrounds radicals to prevent the inter-radical reaction, which is the termination reaction resulting in condensation (dimerization or polymerization). Because of the barrier set by the supercritical water cage, hydrocarbon radical transfer is more difficult in supercritical water as compared to conventional thermal cracking processes, such as delayed coker, where radicals travel freely without such barriers.
Sulfur compounds released from sulfur-containing molecules can be converted to H2S, mercaptans, and elemental sulfur. Without being bound to a particular theory, it is believed that hydrogen sulfide is not “stopped” by the supercritical water cage due its small size and chemical structure similar to water (H2O). Hydrogen sulfide can travel freely through the supercritical water cage to propagate radicals and distribute hydrogen. Hydrogen sulfide can lose its hydrogen due to hydrogen abstraction reactions with hydrocarbon radicals. The resulting hydrogen-sulfur (HS) radical is capable of abstracting hydrogen from hydrocarbons which will result in formation of more radicals. Thus, H2S in radical reactions acts as a transfer agent to transfer radicals and abstract/donate hydrogen.
Supercritical water process 400 can upgrade combined supercritical process feed 40 to produce SWP-treated light product 50 and SWP-treated heavy product 55. The amount of rejected feedstock is one of the parameters of the economics of a steam cracker.
SWP-treated light product 50 can contain hydrocarbons with a boiling point of less than 650 deg F. Advantageously, SWP-treated light product 50 is suitable for processing in steam cracking process 200. SWP-treated light product 50 can be introduced to light mixer 110.
SWP-treated heavy product 55 can contain hydrocarbons with a boiling point of greater than 650 deg F. The amount and composition of SWP-treated heavy product 55 depends on the feedstock and operation conditions. SWP-treated heavy product 55 can exhibit increased stability as compared to cracked residue stream 35 due to the reduce amounts of olefins, including diolefins, and asphaltenes. Cracked residue stream 35 can contain reduced amounts of sulfur and reduced amounts of polynuclear aromatics content as compared to SWP-treated heavy product 55. SWP-treated heavy product 55 can be introduced to the fuel oil tank or can be subjected to further processing. In at least one embodiment, SWP-treated heavy product 55 is further processed in a delayed coker.
Referring to
Hydrogen addition process 500 can be any type of processing unit capable of facilitating the hydrogenation of crude oil in the presence of hydrogen gas. In at least one embodiment, hydrogen addition process 500 is a hydrotreating process. Hydrogen addition process 500 can include pumps, heaters, reactors, heat exchangers, a hydrogen feeding system, a product gas sweetening unit, and other equipment units included in a hydrotreating process. Hydrogen addition process 500 can include a hydrogenation catalyst. The hydrogenation catalyst can be designed to catalyze hydrotreating reactions. Hydrotreating reactions can include hydrogenation reactions, hydrogenative dissociation reactions, hydrocracking reactions, isomerization reactions, alkylation reactions, upgrading reactions, and combinations of the same. Hydrogenative dissociation reactions can remove heteroatoms. Hydrogenation reactions can product saturated hydrocarbons from aromatics and olefinic compounds. The upgrading reactions can include hydrodesulfurization reactions, hydrodemetallization reactions, hydrodenitrogenation reactions, hydrocracking reactions, hydroisomerization reactions, and combinations of the same. In at least one embodiment, the hydrotreating catalyst can be designed to catalyst a hydrogenation reaction in combination with upgrading reactions.
The catalyst can include transition metal sulfides supported on oxide supports. The transition metal sulfides can include cobalt, molybdenum, nickel, tungsten, and combinations of the same. The transition metal sulfides can include cobalt-molybdenum sulfide (CoMoS), nickel-molybdenum sulfide (NiMoS), nickel-tungsten sulfide (NiWS) and combinations of the same. The oxide support material can include alumina, silica, zeolites, and combinations of the same. The oxide support material can include gamma-alumina, amorphous silica-alumina, and alumina-zeolite. The oxide support material can include dopants, such as boron and phosphorus. The oxide support material can be selected based on the textural properties, such as surface area and pore size distribution, surface properties, such as acidity, and combinations of the same. For processing heavy crude oil, the pore size can be large, in the range of between 10 nm and 100 nm, to reduce or prevent pore plugging due to heavy molecules. The oxide support material can be porous to increase the surface area. The surface area of the oxide support material can be in the range of 100 m2/g and 1000 m2/g and alternately in the range of 150 m2/g and 400 m2/g. The acidity of the catalyst can be controlled to prevent over cracking of the hydrocarbon molecules and reduce coking on the catalyst, while maintaining catalytic activity.
Hydrogen addition process 500 can include one or more reactors. The reactors can be arranged in series or in parallel. In at least one embodiment, hydrogen addition process 500 includes more than one reactor, where the reactors are arranged in series and the hydrogenation reaction and upgrading reactions are arranged in different reactors to maximize life of the catalyst in each reactor.
The arrangement of equipment within hydrogen addition process 500 and the operating conditions can be selected to maximize yield of liquid products. In at least one embodiment, hydrogen addition process 500 can be arranged and operated to maximize liquid yield in hydrogen-added stream 60. The hydrogen content and hydrogen to carbon ratio of hydrogen-added stream 60 can be greater than the hydrogen content and hydrogen to carbon ratio of crude oil feed 5. In at least one embodiment, hydrogen addition process 500 can be arranged and operated to reduce the amount of heteroatoms relative to crude oil feed 5 and increase the amount of distillate. Hydrogen-added stream 60 can be introduced to separator unit 100. Hydrogen-added stream 60 can include paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, light gases, and combinations of the same. Light gases can include light hydrocarbons, hydrogen sulfide, and combinations of the same. In at least one embodiment, hydrogen-added stream 60 can include olefins present in an amount of less than 1 wt %.
Hydrogen-added stream 60 can be separated in separator unit 100 to produce light feed 10 and heavy feed 15, described with reference to
Hydrogen addition process 500 can reduce the heavy fraction in hydrogen-added stream 60 relative to crude oil feed 5, but an atmospheric fraction can remain in hydrogen-added stream 60, including asphaltene. Combining hydrogen addition process 500 with separator unit 100 can remove the atmospheric fraction from hydrogen-added stream 60 to produce light feed 10, which can be introduced to steam cracking process 200. Advantageously, introducing heavy feed 15 to supercritical water process 400 can reduce the amount of the atmospheric fraction in heavy feed 15. Advantageously, SWP-treated light product 50 can be in the absence of an atmospheric fraction, which allows SWP-treated light product 50 to be recycled to steam cracking process 200, which increases the overall yield from steam cracking process 200 compared to a process that did not upgrade the heavy fractions from hydrogen addition process 500. Advantageously, supercritical water process 400 can reduce the amount of asphaltenes in heavy feed 15.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Combined separator feed 70 can be introduced to steam cracking process 200. Distillation residue stream 85 can be mixed with cracked residue stream 35 in heavy mixer 120 to produce combined residue stream 90. Combined residue stream 90 can be introduced to supercritical water process 400.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Hydrogen-added heavy product 62 is mixed with cracked residue stream 35 in heavy mixer 120 to produce mixed heavy stream 94.
Advantageously, the embodiments described here accommodate a wider range of feedstocks as crude oil feed 5 compared to a steam cracking process alone. In a process where a steam cracker is followed by a supercritical water process, the supercritical water process can treat the steam cracker effluent to remove sulfur, remove metals, reduce asphaltenes, and reduce viscosity. However, high viscosity oils cannot be processed directly in a steam cracker. Moreover, a feedstock directly introduced to a steam cracking process has a reduced liquid yield unless the feedstock has a high amount of olefins. In the upgrading process of the embodiments described here, the heavy fractions are separated and processed first in the supercritical water process, which can upgrade the heavy fractions to remove sulfur, remove metals, reduce asphaltenes, reduce viscosity and increase the amount of light olefins as compared to the heavy fraction. Thus, the upgrading process described here can handle high viscosity oils and can increase the fraction of light olefins in the feed to the steam cracker.
Additional equipment, such as storage tanks, can be used to contain the feeds to each unit. Instrumentation can be included on the process lines to measure various parameters, including temperatures, pressures, and concentration of water.
The Example is a comparative example comparing the comparative process embodied in
Results are shown in Table 1.
As can be seen by the results in Table 1, the upgrading process described here can produce more light olefins. For example, the upgrading process produced 19% more ethylene compared to the comparative process and 15% more propylene.
Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made hereupon without departing from the principle and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be determined by the following claims and their appropriate legal equivalents.
There various elements described can be used in combination with all other elements described here unless otherwise indicated.
The singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Optional or optionally means that the subsequently described event or circumstances may or may not occur. The description includes instances where the event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not occur.
Ranges may be expressed here as from about one particular value to about another particular value and are inclusive unless otherwise indicated. When such a range is expressed, it is to be understood that another embodiment is from the one particular value to the other particular value, along with all combinations within said range.
Throughout this application, where patents or publications are referenced, the disclosures of these references in their entireties are intended to be incorporated by reference into this application, in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which the invention pertains, except when these references contradict the statements made here.
As used here and in the appended claims, the words “comprise,” “has,” and “include” and all grammatical variations thereof are each intended to have an open, non-limiting meaning that does not exclude additional elements or steps.
This patent application is a divisional of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 16/685,497 filed on Nov. 15, 2019, which is a divisional of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 16/159,271 filed on Oct. 12, 2018, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,526,552 on Jan. 7, 2020. For purposes of United States patent practice, both non-provisional applications are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2733192 | Sage | Jan 1956 | A |
2880171 | Flinn et al. | Mar 1959 | A |
2944012 | Thompson | Jul 1960 | A |
2967204 | Beuther et al. | Jan 1961 | A |
3116234 | Douwes et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3501396 | Gatsis | Mar 1970 | A |
3576596 | Kranc et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3586621 | Pitchford et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3654139 | Winsor et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3690706 | Boik et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3702292 | Burich | Nov 1972 | A |
3708421 | Rippie | Jan 1973 | A |
3733259 | Wilson et al. | May 1973 | A |
3830752 | Mickelson | Aug 1974 | A |
3842014 | Friend et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3864451 | Lee et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3898299 | Jones | Aug 1975 | A |
3948754 | McCollum et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3948755 | McCollum et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3960706 | McCollum et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3960708 | McCollum et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3988238 | McCollum et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3989618 | McCollum et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4005005 | McCollum et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4082695 | Rosinski et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4151068 | McCollum et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4203829 | Bertolacini | May 1980 | A |
4210628 | Ninomiya et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4325926 | Blanton, Jr. | Apr 1982 | A |
4464252 | Eberly, Jr. et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4483761 | Paspek, Jr. | Nov 1984 | A |
4485007 | Tam et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4530755 | Ritchie et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4544481 | Seiver et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4571295 | Forte | Feb 1986 | A |
4594141 | Paspek, Jr. et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4719000 | Beckberger | Jan 1988 | A |
4743357 | Patel et al. | May 1988 | A |
4762814 | Parrott et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4818370 | Gregoli et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4822497 | Hong et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4840725 | Paspek | Jun 1989 | A |
4908122 | Frame et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5087350 | Paris-Marcano | Feb 1992 | A |
5096567 | Paspek et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5167797 | Ou | Dec 1992 | A |
5278138 | Ott et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5316659 | Brons et al. | May 1994 | A |
5411658 | Chawla et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421854 | Kodas et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5439502 | Kodas et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5466363 | Audeh et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5496464 | Piskorz et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5529968 | Sudhakar et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5538930 | Sudhakar et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5558783 | McGuinness | Sep 1996 | A |
5560823 | Whiting | Oct 1996 | A |
5597476 | Hearn et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611915 | Siskin et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616165 | Glicksman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626742 | Brons et al. | May 1997 | A |
5676822 | Sudhakar | Oct 1997 | A |
5695632 | Brons et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5837640 | Sudhakar et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851381 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861136 | Glicksman | Jan 1999 | A |
5906730 | Hatanaka et al. | May 1999 | A |
5928497 | Iaccino | Jul 1999 | A |
5958224 | Ho et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6063265 | Chiyoda et al. | May 2000 | A |
6096194 | Tsybulevskiy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103393 | Kodas et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120679 | Hatanaka et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6153123 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159267 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6197718 | Brignac et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228254 | Jossens et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248230 | Min et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6277271 | Kocal | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6303020 | Podrebarac et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316100 | Kodas et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325921 | Andersen | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334948 | Didillon et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6488840 | Greaney et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500219 | Gunnerman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6551501 | Whitehurst et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579444 | Feimer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6596157 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610197 | Stuntz et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6623627 | Zhou | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6685762 | Brewster et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689186 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699304 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6780350 | Kodas et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6827845 | Gong et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881325 | Morris et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7144498 | McCall et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7264710 | Hokari et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7435330 | Hokari et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7731837 | Song et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7754067 | Allam | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780847 | Choi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7842181 | Choi | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7922895 | Banerjee | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8367425 | Schabron et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8399729 | Davis | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8496786 | Larson, Jr. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8648224 | Vermeiren | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8696888 | Keusenkothen | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8784743 | Keusenkothen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9290706 | Zhao | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9505678 | Choi et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9567530 | Choi | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9656230 | Choi | May 2017 | B2 |
9670419 | Choi | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9777566 | Matzakos | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20020086150 | Hazlebeck | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020162332 | Hazlebeck | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030062163 | Moulton et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030217952 | Brignac et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040007506 | Song et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024072 | Lin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040118748 | Lesemann et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040178123 | Podrebarac | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188327 | Groten | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040232046 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050040078 | Zinnen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050040081 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050067323 | Balko | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072137 | Hokari et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075528 | Burkhardt et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098478 | Gupta et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050167333 | McCall et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050173297 | Toida | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050252831 | Dysard et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050284794 | Davis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011511 | Hokari et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060043001 | Weston et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060151359 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154814 | Zanibelli et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163117 | Hong | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070056881 | Berkowitz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070090021 | McCall et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070111319 | Bastide et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070227950 | Martinie et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234640 | Jia et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070289898 | Banerjee | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080099373 | Hokari et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080099374 | He et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080099375 | Landau et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080099376 | He et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080099377 | He et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090032436 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090139715 | Choi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145808 | Choi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148374 | Choi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159498 | Chinn et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159504 | Choi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090166261 | Li et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090166262 | He et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206006 | Allam | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090206007 | Allam | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090230026 | Choi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090314683 | Matsushita | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100189610 | Allam | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100314583 | Banerjee | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110024330 | Choi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110147266 | Choi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163011 | Yarbro | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110198085 | O'Brian | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110266115 | Berkowitz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110297506 | Choi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110315600 | Choi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000819 | Matsushita | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120060418 | Epstein et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061291 | Choi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061294 | Choi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120132566 | Janssen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138510 | Choi et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120181217 | Choi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130140214 | Choi | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130233766 | Shafi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130267745 | Schrod | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140109465 | Coppola et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140353138 | Amale et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150321945 | Okada | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150321975 | Choi et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150376512 | Lourenco | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170107433 | Choi | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170166821 | Choi | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170166824 | Choi | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180265792 | Choi et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1508221 | Jun 2004 | CN |
101553553 | Oct 2009 | CN |
0199555 | Oct 1986 | EP |
0341893 | Nov 1989 | EP |
1454976 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1537912 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1577007 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1923452 | May 2008 | EP |
07265689 | Oct 1995 | JP |
20090073446 | Jun 2009 | WO |
20110132056 | Oct 2011 | WO |
20130066852 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cheng et al., “Effects of Supercritical Water in Vacuum Residue Upgrading”, Energy and Fuels, vol. 23, 2009, pp. 3178-3183 (see p. 3178, 1. Introduction). |
Adschiri et al., “Catalytic Hydrodesulfurization of Dibenzothiophene through Partial Oxidation and Water-Gas Shift Reaction in Supercritical Water”, published in Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 37, pp. 2634-2638, (1998). |
Adschiri et al., “Hydrogenation through Partial Oxidation of Hydrocarbon in Supercritical Water”, published in Int. J. of the Soc. of Mat. Eng. for Resources, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 273-281, (1999). |
Amemiya et al., “Catalyst Deactivation in Distillate Hydrotreating (Part 2) Raman Analysis of Carbon Deposited on Hydrotreating Catalyst for Vacuum Gas Oil”, Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute (2003), pp. 99-104, vol. 46, No. 2. |
Amestica and Wolf, “Catalytic Liquefaction of Coal With Supercritical Water/CO/Solvent Media”, XP-002663069, Fuel, Sep. 30, 1986, pp. 1226-1332, vol. 65, Butterworth & Co. (1986). |
Arturo J. Hernandez and Ralph T. Yang, “Desulfurization of Transportation Fuels by Adsorption”, Catalysis Reviews (2004), pp. 111-150, vol. 46, No. 2. |
Chica et al., “Catalytic oxidative desulfurization (ODS) of diesel fuel on a continuous fixed-bed reactor”, Journal of Catalysis, vol. 242, (2006), pp. 299-308. |
Choi et al., “Facile ultra-deep desulfurization of gas oil through two-stage or layer catalyst bed”, Catalysis Today (2003), vol. 86, pp. 277-286. |
Choi et al., Impact of removal extent of nitrogen species in gas oil on its HDS performance: an efficient approach to its ultra deep desulfurization:, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental (2004), vol. 50, pp. 9-16. |
Choi et al., “Preparation and Characterization on nano-sized CoMo/A12o3 catalyst for hydrodesulfurization”, Applied Catalysis A: General 260 (2004) 229-236. |
Choi et al., “Preparation of CO2 Absorbent by Spray Pyrolysis”, Chemistry Letters, vol. 32, No. 10 (2003), pp. 924-925. |
De Filippis et al., “Oxidation Desulfurization: Oxidation Reactivity of Sulfur Compounds in Different Organic Matrixes”, Energy & Fuels, vol. 17, No. 6 (2003), pp. 1452-1455. |
Farag et al., “Carbon versus alumina as a support for Co-Mo catalysts reactivity towards HDS of dibenzothiophenes and diesel fuel”, Catalysis Today 50 (1999) 9-17. |
Fathi, et al., “Catalytic Aquaproessing of Arab Light Vacuum Residue via Short Space Times”, Energy & Fuels, 25, 4867-4877(2011). |
Furimsky et al., “Deactivation of hydroprocessing catalyst”, Catalysis Today (1999), pp. 381-495, vol. 52. |
Gao et al., “Adsorption and reduction of NO2 over activated carbon at low temperature”, Fuel Processing Technology 92, 2011, pp. 139-146, Elsevier B.V. |
Gray, et al., “Role of Chain Reactions and Olefin Formation in Cracking, Hydroconversion, and Coking of Petroleum and Bitumen Fractions”, Energy & Fuels, 16, 756-766(2002). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related PCT application PCT/US2019/055801 dated Jan. 24, 2020. (SA5950PCT). |
J.G. Speight, “Visbreaking: A technology of the past and the future”, Scientia Iranica, vol. 19, Issue 3, Jun. 2012, pp. 569-573. |
J.G. Speight, “Handbook of Industrial Hydrocarbon Processes”, Elsevier, 2011, Chapter 11, ISBN 978-0-7506-8632-7, pp. 395-406. |
Kniel, et al., “Ethylene; Keystone to the Petrochemical Industry”, Marcel Dekker, New York(NY), 1980, pp. 62-72. ISBN 0-8247-6914-7. |
Mochida et al., “Kinetic study of the continuous removal of Sox on polyacrylonitrile-based activated carbon fibers”, Fuel, vol. 76, No. 6 (1997), pp. 533-536. |
Mochida et al., “Removal of Sox and Nox over activated carbon fibers”, Carbon, vol. 38 (2000), pp. 227-239. |
PCT/US2018/022301 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 22, 2018; 14 pgs (SA5563PCT). |
Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook,Eighth Ed., 2008, McGraw-Hill, pp. 10-24-10-27. |
Pinero et al., “Temperature programmed desorption study on the mechanism of SO2 oxidation by activated carbon and activated carbon fibers”, Carbon, vol. 39 (2001), pp. 231-242. |
Sampanthar et al., “A novel oxidative desulfurization process to remove refractory sulfur compounds from diesel fuel”, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 63 (2006), pp. 85-93. |
Totten, “Fuels and Lubricants Handbook—Technology, Properties, Performance, and Testing”, ASTM International, 2003, pp. 23. |
Broach et al., “Zeolites”, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Apr. 15, 2012, pp. 1-35. |
Jinli Zhang et. al., “The effect of supercritical water on coal pyrolysis and hydrogen production: A combined ReaxFF and DFT study”, Fuel, 108, 682-690 (2013). |
Heinz Zimmermann and Roland Walzl, “Ethylene”, Ullmann Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2012, vol. 13, pp. 465. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210189264 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16685497 | Nov 2019 | US |
Child | 17193982 | US | |
Parent | 16159271 | Oct 2018 | US |
Child | 16685497 | US |