Patent Grant
8724555
I. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to data communication, and more specifically to techniques for transmitting pilot and signaling (e.g., rate control) information on the uplink in wireless communication systems.
II. Background
Wireless communication systems are widely deployed to provide various types of communication such as voice, packet data, and so on. These systems may be multiple-access systems capable of supporting communication with multiple users sequentially or simultaneously by sharing the available system resources. Examples of such multiple-access systems include code division multiple access (CDMA) systems, time division multiple access (TDMA) systems, and orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) systems.
An OFDM system employs orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) to effectively partition the overall system bandwidth into a number of (N) orthogonal subbands. These subbands are also referred to as tones, frequency bins, and frequency subchannels. Each subband may be viewed as an independent transmission channel that may be used to transmit data.
In a wireless communication system, an RF modulated signal from a transmitter may reach a receiver via a number of propagation paths. The characteristics of the propagation paths typically vary over time due to a number of factors. For an OFDM system, the N subbands may experience different channel conditions and may achieve different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).
An accurate estimate of the response of the wireless channel between the transmitter and the receiver is normally needed in order to effectively transmit data on the available subbands. Channel estimation is typically performed by sending a pilot from the transmitter and measuring the pilot at the receiver. Since the pilot is made up of symbols that are known a priori by the receiver, the channel response can be estimated as the ratio of the received pilot symbols over the transmitted pilot symbols.
Pilot transmission represents overhead in a wireless communication system. Thus, it is desirable to minimize pilot transmission to the extent possible. However, because of noise and other artifacts in the wireless channel, a sufficient amount of pilot needs to be transmitted in order for the receiver to obtain a reasonably accurate estimate of the channel response. Moreover, because the contributions of the propagation paths to the channel response and the propagation paths themselves typically vary over time, the pilot transmission needs to be repeated. The time duration over which the wireless channel may be assumed to be relatively constant is often referred to as a channel coherence time. The repeated pilot transmissions need to be spaced significantly closer than the channel coherence time to maintain high system performance.
In the downlink of a wireless communication system, a single pilot transmission from an access point (or a base station) may be used by a number of terminals to estimate the response of the distinct channels from the access point to each of the terminals. In the uplink, the channel from each of the terminals to the access point typically needs to be estimated through separate pilot transmissions from each of the terminals.
Thus, for a wireless communication system, multiple terminals may each need to transmit a pilot on the uplink to an access point. Moreover, signaling information such as rate control information and acknowledgments for downlink transmission may need to be sent on the uplink. If the uplink transmissions are performed in a time division multiplexed (TDM) manner, then each terminal may be assigned a distinct time slot and would then transmit its pilot and signaling information in the assigned time slot. Depending on the number of active terminals and the duration of the time slots, a relatively large fraction of the uplink transmission time may be taken up by the pilot and signaling transmissions. This inefficiency in the uplink transmission of pilot and signaling information is exacerbated in an OFDM system where the data-carrying capacity of the smallest transmission unit (typically one OFDM symbol) may be quite large.
There is therefore a need in the art for techniques to transmit pilot and signaling information in a more efficient manner in wireless communication systems (e.g., OFDM systems).
Techniques are provided herein to more efficiently transmit pilot and signaling on the uplink in wireless communication systems. With subband multiplexing, the M usable subbands in a system may be partitioned into Q disjoint groups of subbands, where each subband is included in only one group, if at all. Each subband group may then be assigned to a different terminal. Multiple terminals may transmit simultaneously on their assigned subbands.
Using subband multiplexing, an accurate channel estimate may be obtained for each terminal for the entire usable band based on uplink pilot transmission on only a small subset of the usable subbands. If the total energy used for pilot transmission on S subbands is maintained so as to equal to the total energy otherwise used for pilot transmission on all M usable subbands, then it is possible to use the pilot transmission on only S subbands to accurately interpolate the channel response for the other M-S subbands.
One embodiment provides a method for transmitting pilot on the uplink in a wireless communication system (e.g., an OFDM system) with a plurality of subbands. In accordance with the method, M usable subbands suitable for data transmission in the system are initially partitioned into Q disjoint groups of subbands. The Q groups may include equal or different number of subbands, and the subbands in each group may be uniformly or non-uniformly distributed across the M usable subbands. A different group of subbands is assigned to each of one or more terminals for uplink pilot transmission. Pilot transmission is then received from the one or more terminals on the assigned groups of subbands. For each terminal, the transmit power for the pilot in each subband may be scaled higher (e.g., by a factor of Q) so that the same total pilot energy is achieved even though the pilot transmission is over S instead of M subbands. The power scaling may be performed such that the total transmit power available at each terminal is observed, transmit power constraints (e.g., regulatory constraints) are met, and hardware component costs are minimally increased (if at all). A channel estimate may then be derived for each terminal based on the pilot received on the subbands assigned to the terminal. The channel estimate for each terminal can cover one or more additional subbands not included in the group assigned to the terminal. For example, the channel estimate may include the response for all M usable subbands.
Subband multiplexing may also be used for transmission of signaling information on the uplink. The signaling information may comprise rate control information used for downlink data transmission, acknowledgment for data received on the downlink, and so on.
Various aspects and embodiments of the invention are described in further detail below.
The features, nature, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which like reference characters identify correspondingly throughout and wherein:
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” An embodiment or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs.
The techniques described herein to transmit pilot and signaling information may be used in various types of wireless communication system. For example, these techniques may be used for CDMA, TDMA, FDMA, and ODFM systems. These techniques may also be used for hybrid systems such as an OFDM TDM system that transmits pilot/signaling and traffic data using time division multiplexing, whereby OFDM is used for pilot/signaling and another transmission scheme is used for traffic data. For clarity, these techniques are specifically described below for an OFDM system.
Terminals 120 may be dispersed throughout the system. A terminal may also be referred to as a mobile station, a remote station, an access terminal, a user equipment (UE), a wireless device, or some other terminology. Each terminal may be a fixed or a mobile terminal that can communicate with one or possibly multiple access points on the downlink and/or uplink at any given moment. The downlink (or forward link) refers to transmission from the access point to the terminal, and the uplink (or reverse link) refers to transmission from the terminal to the access point.
In
As shown in
The slots in the uplink phase of each MAC frame may be assigned to one or more terminals for uplink transmission. Each terminal would then transmit on its assigned slot(s).
Frame structure 200 represents a specific implementation that may be used for the OFDM system if only one frequency band is available. If two frequency bands are available, then the downlink and uplink may be transmitted on separate frequency bands using frequency division duplex (FDD). In this case, the downlink phase may be implemented on one frequency band, and the uplink phase may be implemented on the other frequency band.
The pilot and signaling transmission techniques described herein may be used for both TDD-based and FDD-based frame structures. For simplicity, these techniques are described specifically for the TDD-based frame structure.
For OFDM, the data to be transmitted on each subband is first modulated (i.e., symbol mapped) using a particular modulation scheme selected for use for that subband. For the N-M unused subbands, the signal value is set to zero. For each symbol period, the M modulation symbols and N-M zeros for all N subbands are transformed to the time domain with an inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) to obtain a transformed symbol that comprises N time-domain samples. The duration of each transformed symbol is inversely related to the bandwidth of each subband. For example, if the system bandwidth is W=20 MHz and N=256, then the bandwidth of each subband is 78.125 KHz and the duration of each transformed symbol is 12.8 μsec.
OFDM can provide certain advantages, such as the ability to combat frequency selective fading, which is characterized by different channel gains at different frequencies of the overall system bandwidth. It is well known that frequency selective fading causes inter-symbol interference (ISI), which is a phenomenon whereby each symbol in a received signal acts as distortion to subsequent symbols in the received signal. The ISI distortion degrades performance by impacting the ability to correctly detect the received symbols. Frequency selective fading can be conveniently combated with OFDM by repeating a portion of (or appending a cyclic prefix to) each transformed symbol to form a corresponding OFDM symbol, which is then transmitted.
The length of the cyclic prefix (i.e., the amount to repeat) for each OFDM symbol is dependent on the delay spread of the wireless channel. The delay spread for a given transmitter is the difference between the earliest and latest arriving signal instances at a receiver for the signal transmitted by this transmitter. The delay spread for the system is the expected worst case delay spread for all terminals in the system. To effectively combat ISI, the cyclic prefix should be longer than the delay spread.
Each transformed symbol has a duration of N sample periods, where each sample period has a duration of (1/W) μsec. The cyclic prefix may be defined to comprise Cp samples, where Cp is an integer selected based on the expected delay spread of the system. In particular, Cp is selected to be greater than or equal to the number of taps (L) for the impulse response of the wireless channel (i.e., Cp≧L). In this case, each OFDM symbol would include N+Cp samples, and each symbol period would span N+Cp sample periods.
In some OFDM systems, pilots are transmitted on the uplink by the terminals to allow the access point to estimate the uplink channel. If the TDD-TDM frame structure shown in
Techniques are provided herein to more efficiently transmit pilot on the uplink in the OFDM system. To be effective, a pilot transmission scheme needs to be designed such that accurate channel estimates can be obtained for each active terminal based on the uplink pilot transmission from the terminal. However, it has been discovered that the quality of the channel estimates is generally determined by the total energy of the pilot rather than the specifics of the pilot transmission scheme. The total pilot energy is equal to the transmit power used for the pilot multiplied by the time duration of the pilot transmission.
An accurate channel estimate may be obtained for the entire usable band based on pilot transmission on only S subbands, where S is selected such that Cp≦S≦M and is typically much less than M. One such channel estimation technique is described in the aforementioned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,638, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,362, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/173,592. In fact, it can be shown that if the total energy used for pilot transmission on the S subbands is equal to the total energy used for pilot transmission on all M subbands, then it is possible to accurately interpolate the channel response for the other M-S subbands based on the pilot transmission on the S subbands using the channel estimation technique above. In other words, if the total pilot energy is the same, then the interpolated channel response for the M-S subbands would typically have the same quality (e.g., the same average mean squared error) as the channel estimate obtained based on pilot transmission on all M subbands.
Subband multiplexing may be used to allow multiple terminals to transmit pilot simultaneously on the uplink. To implement subband multiplexing, the M usable subbands may be partitioned into Q disjoint groups of subbands such that each usable subband appears in only one group, if at all. The Q groups may include the same or different numbers of subbands, and the subbands in each group may be uniformly or non-uniformly distributed across the M usable subbands. It is also not necessary to use all M subbands in the Q groups (i.e., some usable subbands may be omitted from use for pilot transmission).
In an embodiment, each group includes S subbands, where S=└M/Q┘ and S≧Cp, where “└ ┘” denotes the floor operator. The number of subbands in each group should be equal to or greater than the delay spread Cp so that the effects of ISI can be mitigated and a more accurate channel estimate can be obtain.
The Q groups of subbands may be assigned to up to Q terminals for uplink pilot transmission. Each terminal would then transmit the pilot on its assigned subbands. With subband multiplexing, up to Q terminals may simultaneously transmit pilots on the uplink on up to M usable subbands. This can greatly reduce the amount of time needed for uplink pilot transmission.
To allow the access point to obtain high quality channel estimates, each terminal may increase the transmit power per subband by a factor of Q. This would result in the total pilot energy for the pilot transmission on the S assigned subbands to be the same as if all M subbands were used for pilot transmission. The same total pilot energy would allow the access point to estimate the channel response of the entire usable band based on a subset of the M usable subbands with little or no loss in quality, as described below.
The OFDM system may be operated in a frequency band that has a per MHz power constraint of P dBm/MHz and a total power constraint of P·W dBm. For example, the 5 GHz UNII band includes three 20 MHz frequency bands designated as UNII-1, UNII-2, and UNII-3. These three frequency bands have total transmit power restrictions of 17, 24, and 30 dBm and per MHz power restrictions of 4, 11 and 17 dBm/MHz, respectively. The power constraints per terminal may be selected based on the lowest power constraints for the three frequency bands, so that the per MHz power constraint is P=4 dBm/MHz and the total power constraint is P·W=17 dBm.
The groups of subbands may be formed such that full transmit power may be used for uplink pilot transmission even if the per MHz and total power constraints are imposed on each terminal. In particular, if the spacing between the subbands within each group is approximately 1 MHz, then each terminal can transmit the uplink pilot on all S subbands assigned to it at a power per subband of P dBm, and still abide by the per MHz power constraint. The total transmit power for the S subbands would then be equal to P·S dBm, which is approximately equal to P·W dBm since S˜W due to the 1 MHz spacing. In general, the per MHz and total power constraints can be met by appropriate scaling as long as S>W, where W is given in units of MHz.
In an exemplary OFDM system, the system bandwidth is W=20 MHz, N=256, and M=224. The OFDM pilot structure includes Q=12 groups, with each group including S=18 subbands. For this pilot structure, 216 of the 224 usable subbands may be used simultaneously for uplink pilot transmission and the remaining 8 subbands are not used.
In general, the amount of transmit power that may be used for each subband in each group is dependent on various factors such as (1) the per MHz and total power constraints and (2) the distribution of the subbands in each group. The terminals may transmit the uplink pilot at full power even if the spacing between the subbands is not uniform and/or is less than 1 MHz. The specific amounts of power to use for the subbands would then be determined based on the distribution of the subbands among the Q groups. For simplicity, the S subbands in each group are assumed to be uniformly spaced and separated by the required minimum spacing (e.g., at least 1 MHz).
One group of subbands is assigned to each active terminal for uplink pilot transmission (step 514). The subband assignment may be determined at call setup or at a later time, and may be signaled to the terminal. Thereafter, each terminal transmits pilot on the uplink on its assigned subbands (step 522). Each terminal may also scale up the transmit power used for uplink pilot transmission, with the amount of transmit power used for each subband being determined based on the various factors noted above. The amount of transmit power to use for each subband (or each group of subband) may also be specified by the access point and signaled to the terminal along with the subband assignment.
The access point receives uplink pilot transmissions from all active terminals on all or a subset of the M usable subbands (step 532). The access point then processes the received signal to obtain per-subband channel estimate for the subbands assigned to each active terminal (step 534). For each active terminal, the channel estimate for the entire usable band may then be derived based on the per-subband channel estimate obtained for the assigned subbands (step 536). The channel estimate for the entire usable band may be derived from the channel estimate for a subset of the usable subbands using various techniques. One such channel estimation technique is described in the aforementioned US. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,638, US. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,362, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/173,592. The channel estimate for the entire usable band may also be derived by interpolating the per-subband channel estimate for a subset of the usable subbands.
For each active terminal, the channel estimate for the entire usable band may thereafter be used for downlink and/or uplink data transmission to/from the terminal (step 538). The uplink pilot transmission and channel estimation are typically continually performed during a communication session to obtain up-to-date channel estimates.
The model for an OFDM system may be expressed as:
r=H∘x+n, Eq (1)
With subband multiplexing, each active terminal transmits pilot on its S assigned subbands during the pilot transmission interval. The transmitted pilot for each terminal may be denoted by an (N×1) vector xi, which includes a pilot symbol for each of the S assigned subbands and zeros for all other subbands. The transmit power for the pilot symbol for each assigned subband may be expressed as PUL=xi, j2, where xi,j is the pilot symbol transmitted on the j-th subband by terminal i.
A per-subband channel estimate Ĥimeas for terminal i may be expressed as:
Ĥimeas=ri/xi=Hi+ni/xi, Eq (2)
An estimate for H in equation (1) may be obtained from the per-subband channel estimate Ĥimeas using several techniques. One such technique, as noted above, is described in the aforementioned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,638, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,362, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/173,592.
If all N subbands are used for data transmission (i.e., M=N), it can be shown that the mean square error (MSE) for the channel estimate obtained based on pilot transmission on only S subbands using the technique described in the aforementioned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,638, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,362, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/173,592 is the same as the MSE for the channel estimate obtained based on pilot transmission on all N subbands, if the following conditions are satisfied:
The total transmit power that may be used for transmission by a terminal is normally constrained by the lesser of (1) the total transmit power Ptotal of the terminal (which may be limited by the terminal's power amplifier) and (2) the total power constraint P·W of the operating band. The average transmit power Pavg is then equal to the smaller of Ptotal/N and P·W/N. For example, Pavg=P·W/N if the total transmit power that may be used by the terminal is limited by regulatory constraints
If only a subset of the N total subbands is used for data transmission (i.e., M<N), which is the case if some subbands are used for guard bands, then the minimum mean square error (MMSE) is only attained if S=M. However, it has been found in the aforementioned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,638, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,362, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/173,592 that if S≈1.1 Cp then the MSE is close to the MMSE. Hence, for the case in which S≦M≦N, the MSE is minimized for the channel estimate obtained based on pilot transmission on only S subbands, if the following conditions are satisfied:
In many wireless systems, the terminals may need to send signaling information on the uplink to the access point. For example, the terminals may need to inform the access point of the rate(s) to use for downlink data transmission, send acknowledgment for received data packets, and so on. The signaling information typically comprises a small amount of data, but may need to be sent in a timely manner, and possibly on a regular basis.
In some systems, rate control information may need to be sent on the uplink to indicate the rate that may be used on the downlink for each of one or more transmission channels. Each transmission channel may correspond to a spatial subchannel (i.e., an eigenmode) in a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system, a subband or frequency subchannel in an OFDM system, a time slot in a TDD system, and so on. Each terminal may estimate the downlink channel and determine the maximum rate that may be supported by each of the transmission channels. Rate control information for the transmission channels may then be sent back to the access point and used to determine the rate for downlink data transmission to the terminal. The rate control information may be in the form of one or more rate codes, each of which may be mapped to a specific combination of code rate, modulation scheme, and so on. Alternatively, the rate control information may be provided in some other form (e.g., the received SNR for each transmission channel). In any case, the rate control information for each transmission channel may comprise 3 to 4 bits, and the rate control information for all transmission channels may comprise a total of 15 bits.
As another example, channel response or frequency selectivity information may need to be reported back to the access point. The number of bits required for the channel response or frequency selectivity information may be dependent on the granularity of the information being sent (e.g., every subband, or every n-th subband).
Techniques are also provided herein to more efficiently transmit signaling information on the uplink in the OFDM system. The M usable subbands may be partitioned into a number of QR disjoint groups, where each usable subband appears in only one group, if at all. The QR groups may include the same or different number of subbands. The grouping of the usable subbands for uplink signaling information may be the same or different from the grouping of the usable subbands for uplink pilot transmission. Each subband group may be allocated to one terminal for uplink signaling transmission. Multiple terminals may transmit signaling information simultaneously on their assigned subbands.
The use of subband multiplexing to send uplink signaling information may provide various benefits. Because of the relatively large data-carrying capacity of an OFDM symbol, it may be extremely inefficient to allocate entire OFDM symbols to active terminals when only a small amount of data needs to be sent. Using subband multiplexing, the number of subbands allocated to each active terminal may be commensurate with the amount of data that needs to be sent.
The savings provided by subband multiplexing may be even greater if the transmit power per subband is increased by the number of terminals multiplexed together within the same time interval. The higher transmit power per subband would result in higher received SNR at the access point, which would then support a higher order modulation scheme. This would in turn allow more data or information bits to be transmitted on each subband. Alternatively, each terminal may be assigned fewer subbands so that more terminals may be multiplexed together in the same time interval. The fewer subbands can provide the requisite data-carrying capacity if a higher order modulation scheme is used.
Subband multiplexing may also be used for the transmission of acknowledgment on the uplink. For some systems, an acknowledgment may need to be sent by the receiver to acknowledge correct or erroneous detection of each packet received by the receiver. Improved system efficiency may be achieved by reducing the granularity of the allocation of resources for acknowledgment transmission (i.e., by assigning a group of subbands instead of entire OFDM symbol to each terminal).
The amount of data to send for acknowledgment may differ from terminal to terminal and also from frame to frame. This is because each terminal typically only sends acknowledgments for packets received in the current/prior MAC frame, and the number of packets sent to each terminal can differ among terminals and over time. In contrast, the amount of data to send for rate control tends to be more constant.
A number schemes may be used to allocate subbands for uplink transmission of variable amounts of signaling (e.g., acknowledgment) among active terminals. In one scheme, the M usable subbands are partitioned into a number of QA disjoint groups. The QA groups may include the same or different number of subbands. Each active terminal may be assigned a variable number of subbands for acknowledgment transmission. For this scheme, the number of subbands assigned to a given terminal may be proportional to the number of packets sent to the terminal.
In another scheme, each active terminal is assigned a fixed number of subbands for acknowledgment transmission. However, the modulation scheme used by each terminal is not fixed, but can be selected based on the channel conditions. For a reciprocal channel whereby the downlink and uplink are highly correlated, the transmission capacities of the downlink and uplink are related. Thus, if more packets can be sent on the downlink within a given time period because of improved channel conditions, then the same channel conditions can support the transmission of more information bits on the uplink in a given time interval. Thus, by allocating a fixed number of subbands to each active terminal but allowing the modulation to adapt based on the channel conditions, more acknowledgment bits may be sent when needed.
To simplify the assignment of subbands to active terminals, the subbands may be arranged into groups, and the terminals may be assigned groups of subbands instead of individual subbands. In general, each group may include any number of subbands, depending on the desired granularity for the subband assignment. As an example, 37 groups of subbands may be formed, with each group including 6 subbands. A given terminal may then be assigned any number of subband groups, depending on its data requirement.
For a specific OFDM system design, between 150 and 2000 bits may be transmitted in two OFDM symbols for a range of rates supported by the system. This range of bit rates is also achieved under the assumption that higher transmit power is used for each subband with subband multiplexing. Each of the 37 subband groups for the example described above may then be used to send 150/37 to 2000/37 bits for acknowledgments, depending on the channel conditions. Thus, the fixed number of subbands in each group may be able to send a variable number of bits for acknowledgment, depending on the rate selected for use, which in turn depends on the channel conditions.
There may be instances where the transmit power per subband needs to be maintained at the same level as for data transmission. This situation may arise, for example, if all of the usable subbands are allocated to a single terminal. However when the subbands have lower data-carrying capacity, the requirement on it is also correspondingly lower. Two OFDM symbols may be adequate for acknowledgment data for all expected channel configurations.
In an alternative scheme, acknowledgment data is sent along with uplink packet data. Additional delay may be incurred for the acknowledgment data if it needs to wait for packet data to be sent on the uplink. If the additional delay is tolerable, then the acknowledgment data may be sent with essentially no overhead since the amount of acknowledgment data is typically small and will likely fit in the padding portion of an uplink data packet.
In yet another scheme, acknowledgment data is sent along with the rate control information. The group of subbands assigned to each active terminal for rate control transmission may have greater data-carrying capacity than that needed to send the rate control information. In this case, the acknowledgment data may be sent in the excess data-carrying capacity of the subbands allocated for rate control.
When subband multiplexing is used for transmission of signaling information on the uplink, the access point can process the received signal to individually recover the signaling (e.g., rate control and acknowledgment) sent by each terminal.
Various other frame structures may also be designed for use, and this is within the scope of the invention. For example, the uplink phase may include a rate control segment used to send rate control information and an acknowledgment segment used to send acknowledgment data. As another example, the frame may be partitioned into multiple uplink and downlink phases, and different phases may be used for different types of transmission such as traffic data, pilot, rate signaling, and acknowledgement.
Subband multiplexing can substantially reduce the amount of resources needed to support the transmission of pilot and signaling on the uplink, as quantified below. However, various factors may need to be considered in the implementation of subband multiplexing, such as (1) overhead signaling for the assignment of subbands to the terminals, (2) timing offset among the uplink transmissions received from the terminals, and (3) frequency offset among the uplink transmissions from the terminals. Each of these factors is described in further detail below.
Overhead signaling is needed to convey the subband assignment for each terminal. For pilot and rate control information, each active terminal may be assigned a specific subband group for each or for both types of uplink transmission. This assignment may be made during call setup, and the assigned subbands typically do not need to be repeated or changed for every MAC frame.
If there are 24 subband groups for up to 24 terminals, then 5 bits would be sufficient to identify the specific subband group assigned to a terminal. These 5 bits may be included in a control message sent to a terminal to put it into an active state. If the control message has a length of 80 bits, then the 5 bits for subband assignment would increase the message length by approximately 6%.
The amount of overhead signaling would be greater if there is flexibility in forming the subband groups and/or if the groups may be dynamically assigned to the terminals. For example, if the number of subbands assigned for acknowledgment transmission can change from frame to frame, then higher amount of overhead signaling would be needed to convey the subband assignment.
The multiple terminals allowed to transmit concurrently via subband multiplexing may be located throughout the system. If these terminals have different distances to the access point, then the propagation times for the signals transmitted from these terminals would be different. In this case, if the terminals transmit their signals at the same time, then the access point would receive the signals from these terminals at different times. The difference between the earliest and latest arriving signals at the access point would be dependent on the difference in the round trip delays for the terminals with respect to the access point.
The difference in arrival times for the signals from different terminals would cut into the delay spread tolerance of the farther terminals. As an example, for an access point with a coverage area of 50 meters in radius, the maximum difference in arrival times between the earliest and latest arriving signals is approximately 330 nsec. This would represent a significant portion of an 800 nsec cyclic prefix. Moreover, the effect of diminished delay spread tolerance is worst for the terminals at the edge of the coverage area, which are most in need of resilience to multipath delay spread.
In an embodiment, to account for the difference in round trip delays among the active terminals, the uplink timing of each active terminal is adjusted so that its signal arrives within a particular time window at the access point. A timing adjustment loop may be maintained for each active terminal and would estimate the round trip delay for the terminal. The uplink transmission from the terminal would then be advanced or delayed by an amount determined by the estimated round trip delay such that the uplink transmissions from all active terminals arrive within the particular time window at the access point.
The timing adjustment for each active terminal may be derived based on the pilot or some other uplink transmission from the terminal. For example, the uplink pilot may be correlated against a copy of the pilot by the access point. The result of the correlation is an indication of whether the received pilot is early or late with respect to the pilots from the other terminals. A 1-bit timing adjustment value may then be sent to the terminal to direct it to advance or retard its timing by a particular amount (e.g., ±one sample period). If subband multiplexing is used to permit simultaneous transmission by multiple terminals on their assigned subbands, then the signals from nearby terminals may cause substantial interference to the signals from faraway terminals if all terminals transmit at full power. In particular, it can be shown that frequency offset among the terminals can result in inter-subband interference. This interference can cause degradation in the channel estimate derived from uplink pilots and/or increase the bit error rate of uplink data transmissions. To mitigate the effects of inter-subband interference, the terminals may be power controlled so that the nearby terminals do not cause excessive interference to faraway terminals.
The effect of interference from nearby terminals was investigated, and it was discovered that power control may be applied coarsely to mitigate the inter-subband interference effect. In particular, it was found that if the maximum frequency offset among the terminals is 300 Hz or less, then by limiting the SNRs of the nearby terminals to 40 dB or less, there would be a loss of 1 dB or less in the SNRs of the other terminals. And if the frequency offset among the terminals is 1000 Hz or less, then the SNRs of the nearby terminals need to be limited to 27 dB to ensure 1 dB or less of loss in the SNRs of the other terminals. If the SNR needed to achieve the highest rate supported by the OFDM system is less than 27 dB, then limiting the SNR of nearby terminals to 27 dB (or 40 dB) would not have any impact on the maximum supported data rates for the nearby terminals.
The coarse power control requirements stated above may be achieved with a slow power control loop. For example, control messages may be sent when and as needed to adjust the uplink power of nearby terminals (e.g., when the power level changes due to movement by these terminals). Each terminal may be informed of the initial transmit power level to use for the uplink when accessing the system as part of the call setup.
The groups of subbands may be assigned to the active terminals in a manner to mitigate the effect of inter-subband interference. In particular, terminals with high received SNRs may be assigned subbands near each other. Terminals with low received SNRs may be assigned subbands near each other, but away from the subbands assigned to the terminals with high received SNRs.
The ability to have up to Q simultaneous uplink pilot transmissions reduces the overhead for pilot by a factor of up to Q. The improvement can be significant since the uplink pilot transmission can represent a large portion of the uplink phase. The amount of improvement may be quantified for an exemplary OFDM system.
In this exemplary OFDM system, the system bandwidth is W=20 MHz and N=256. Each sample period has a duration of 50 nsec. A cyclic prefix of 800 nsec (or Cp=16 samples) is used, and each OFDM symbol has a duration of 13.6 μsec (or N+Cp=272 samples). The uplink pilot is transmitted in each MAC frame, which has a duration of 5 msec or 367 OFDM symbols. The pilot transmission from each terminal needs to have total energy of 4 symbol periods×full transmit power. If there are K active terminals, then the total number of symbol periods used for pilot transmissions without subband multiplexing is 4·K. For K=12, 48 symbol periods would be used for uplink pilot transmission, which would represent approximately 13.1% of the 367 symbols in the MAC frame. The pilot overhead would increase to 26.2% of the MAC frame if there are K=24 active terminals.
If the K active terminals are assigned to K groups of subbands and are allowed to transmit the uplink pilot simultaneously, then only 4 symbol periods would be required in each MAC frame for the uplink pilot. The use of subband multiplexing for the uplink pilot reduces the overhead to 1.1% of the MAC frame for K=12 and 2.2% for K=24. This represents a significant saving of 12% and 24% for K=12 and 24, respectively, in the amount of overhead required for uplink pilot transmission.
The amount of saving for an exemplary OFDM system that supports QR simultaneous uplink rate control transmissions may also be quantified. This exemplary OFDM system has M=224 usable subbands and uses BPSK modulation with a rate ⅓ code. The number of information bits per modulation symbol is ⅓, and approximately 75 information bits may be sent on the 224 usable subbands for each symbol period. If each terminal sends 15 bits or less of rate control information for each MAC frame, then approximately 5 terminals may be accommodated simultaneously on the same OFDM symbol. Without subband multiplexing, 5 OFDM symbols would need to be assigned to the 5 terminals for their rate control information (where each OFDM symbol would contain a large amount of padding for the unused bits). With subband multiplexing, the same rate control information may be sent within one OFDM symbol, which would represent an 80% saving.
The amount of savings with subband multiplexing is even greater for some diversity transmission modes. For a space-time transmit diversity (STTD) scheme, each pair of modulation symbols (denoted as s1 and S2) is transmitted over two symbol periods from two transmit antennas. The first antenna transmits a vector x1=[s1, s2*]T over 2 symbol periods and the second antenna transmits a vector x2=[s2−s1*]T over the same 2 symbol periods. The transmission unit for STTD is effectively two OFDM symbols. With subband multiplexing, rate control information for 10 terminals may be sent in 2 OFDM symbols, which is substantially less than the 20 OFDM symbols that would be needed if each terminal transmits its rate control information on a separate pair of OFDM symbols.
The amount of saving is even greater for a diversity transmission mode that uses 4 antennas and has a transmission unit of 4 OFDM symbols. For this diversity transmission mode, 15 terminals may be subband multiplexed onto one 4-symbol period. The rate control information for the 15 terminals may be sent in 4 OFDM symbols with subband multiplexing, which is substantially less than the 60 OFDM symbols that would be needed if each terminal transmits its rate control information on a separate set of four OFDM symbols.
As can be seen from the plots in
An OFDM modulator 720 receives and processes the coded data and pilot symbols to provide a stream of OFDM symbols. The processing by OFDM modulator 720 may include (1) modulating the coded data to form modulation symbols, (2) multiplexing the modulation symbols with pilot symbols, (3) transforming the modulation and pilot symbols to obtain transformed symbols, and (4) appending a cyclic prefix to each transformed symbol to form a corresponding OFDM symbol.
A transmitter unit (TMTR) 722 then receives and converts the stream of OFDM symbols into one or more analog signals and further conditions (e.g., amplifies, filters, and upconverts) the analog signals to generate a downlink modulated signal suitable for transmission over the wireless channel. The modulated signal is then transmitted via an antenna 724 to the terminals.
At terminal 120x, the downlink modulated signal is received by antenna 752 and provided to a receiver unit (RCVR) 754. Receiver unit 754 conditions (e.g., filters, amplifies, and downconverts) the received signal and digitizes the conditioned signal to provide samples.
An OFDM demodulator 756 then removes the cyclic prefix appended to each OFDM symbol, transforms each received transformed symbol using an FFT, and demodulates the received modulation symbols to provide demodulated data. An RX data processor 758 then decodes the demodulated data to recover the transmitted traffic data, which is provided to a data sink 760. The processing by OFDM demodulator 756 and RX data processor 758 is complementary to that performed by OFDM modulator 720 and TX data processor 710, respectively, at access point 110x.
As shown in
At access point 110x, the uplink modulated signal from terminal 120x is received by antenna 724, conditioned by a receiver unit 742, demodulated by an OFDM demodulator 744, and processed by a RX data processor 746 to recover the pilot and signaling information transmitted by the terminal. The recovered signaling information is provided to controller 730 and used to control the processing of the downlink data transmission to the terminal. For example, the rate on each transmission channel may be determined based on the rate control information provided by the terminal, or may be determined based on the channel estimates from the terminal. The received acknowledgment may be used to initiate retransmission of packets received in error by the terminal. Controller 730 may also derive the enhanced channel frequency response for each terminal based on the uplink pilot transmitted on the assigned subbands, as described above.
Controllers 730 and 770 direct the operation at the access point and terminal, respectively. Memories 732 and 772 provide storage for program codes and data used by controllers 730 and 770, respectively.
The uplink pilot and signaling transmission techniques described herein may be implemented by various means. For example, these techniques may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination thereof. For a hardware implementation, the elements used to implement any one or a combination of the techniques may be implemented within one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, or a combination thereof.
For a software implementation, these techniques may be implemented with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein. The software codes may be stored in a memory unit (e.g., memory units 732 or 772 in
Headings are included herein for reference and to aid in locating certain sections. These headings are not intended to limit the scope of the concepts described therein under, and these concepts may have applicability in other sections throughout the entire specification.
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
The present Application for Patent is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 11/138,824 entitled “Uplink Pilot and Signaling Transmission in Wireless Communication Systems”, filed May 25, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,042,857, which is a Continuation of patent application Ser. No. 10/340,507 file Jan. 1, 10, 2003, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,928,062, which claims priority to Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,368, filed Oct. 29, 2002 and to Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/422,362, filed Oct. 29, 2002, all assigned to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4346473 | Davis | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4617657 | Drynan et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4850036 | Smith | Jul 1989 | A |
| 5282222 | Fattouche et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5408496 | Ritz et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5416780 | Patel et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5511233 | Otten | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5519130 | Byrom et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5519730 | Jasper et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5694389 | Seki et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5732351 | Olds et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5822700 | Hult et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5867478 | Baum et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5889759 | McGibney | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5920547 | Werth | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5995494 | Horikawa | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005852 | Kokko et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6021124 | Haartsen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6052377 | Ohmi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6104926 | Hogg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105064 | Davis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6134434 | Krishnamurthi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141550 | Ayabe et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6157839 | Cerwall et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6172971 | Kim | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6173016 | Suzuki | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6188717 | Kaiser et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6222828 | Ohlson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6263205 | Yamaura et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6285665 | Chuah | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6333937 | Ryan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6347091 | Wallentin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6367045 | Khan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6369758 | Zhang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377587 | Grivna | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377809 | Rezaiifar et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6430412 | Hogg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6430724 | Laneman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6447210 | Coombs | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6449245 | Ikeda et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466591 | See et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473393 | Ariyavisitakul et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473467 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6477210 | Chuang et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6487235 | Hoole | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6487252 | Kleider et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6505253 | Chiu et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6522886 | Youngs et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6532227 | Leppisaari et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6532256 | Miller | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6535715 | Dapper et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6545997 | Bohnke et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6549561 | Crawford et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6563858 | Fakatselis et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567374 | Bohnke et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567397 | Smigelski et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6594320 | Sayeed | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597680 | Lindskog et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597745 | Dowling et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597918 | Kim et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601207 | Vanttinen | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6603801 | Andren et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6618454 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6633616 | Crawford et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6636568 | Kadous | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6643281 | Ryan | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6654429 | Li et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6658619 | Chen | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6661832 | Sindhushayana et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6665309 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6674792 | Sugita et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6697347 | Östman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6700865 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6724813 | Jamal et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6731614 | Ohlson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6741634 | Kim et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6751187 | Walton et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6801564 | Rouphael et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6813478 | Glazko et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6876694 | Komatsu | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6878694 | Doshi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6885645 | Ryan et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6888805 | Bender et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6907246 | Xu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6909761 | Kloos et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6928062 | Krishnan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6975647 | Neale et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6977974 | Geraniotis et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6990142 | Chappaz et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6996195 | Kadous et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7009960 | Ho | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020110 | Walton et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7027429 | Laroia et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7027523 | Jalali et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7039001 | Krishnan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7039004 | Sun et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7042429 | Miyazawa et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7042857 | Krishnan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7042869 | Bender | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7046651 | Terry | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054902 | Toporek et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7058134 | Sampath | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7061915 | Seidel et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7061916 | Herron et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7062276 | Xu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7068703 | Maric | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7072413 | Walton et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7089024 | Kim, II et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7099296 | Belcea | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7099299 | Liang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7099622 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103823 | Nemawarkar | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7127012 | Han et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7133460 | Bae et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7139320 | Singh et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7177297 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7181170 | Love et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7181666 | Grob et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7254158 | Agrawal | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7280467 | Smee et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7283559 | Cho et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7310336 | Malkamaki et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7320043 | Shatas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7366272 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7376422 | Yagihashi | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7411895 | Laroia et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7430253 | Olson et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7450587 | Gruhn et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7453849 | Teague et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7463576 | Krishnan et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7474686 | Ho | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7519016 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7551546 | Ma et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7630403 | Ho et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7631247 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7778337 | Tong et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 20020034161 | Deneire et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020034172 | Ho et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020041635 | Ma et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020044540 | Mottier et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020080902 | Kim et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020097697 | Bae et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119784 | Agin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122431 | Cho et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136273 | Hoole et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020145968 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020145970 | Han et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152315 | Kagan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160781 | Bark et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196731 | Laroia et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030012174 | Bender et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030079022 | Toporek et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123481 | Neale et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135640 | Ho et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030161343 | Ghosh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030165131 | Liang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174662 | Malkamaki | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174700 | Ofek et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030214906 | Hu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030214930 | Fischer | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030227898 | Logalbo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228865 | Terry et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001429 | Ma et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040047298 | Yook et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040062206 | Soong et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082336 | Jami et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082356 | Walton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040095903 | Ryan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114552 | Lim et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114566 | Lim et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114618 | Tong et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116125 | Terry et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118267 | Harrison | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136445 | Olson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137863 | Walton et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137943 | Tseng | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170439 | Hiironen | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040184471 | Chuah et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196871 | Terry | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205105 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213278 | Pullen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040235472 | Fujishima et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040253968 | Chang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040258134 | Cho et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050002355 | Takano | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050002369 | Ro et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050013263 | Kim et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050030976 | Wentink | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050034049 | Nemawarkar et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044439 | Shatas et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069022 | Agrawal | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163194 | Gore et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165949 | Teague | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050174931 | Krishnamoorthi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190868 | Khandekar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050254555 | Teague | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272432 | Ji et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281242 | Sutivong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281290 | Khandekar et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060034163 | Gore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034173 | Teague et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060045001 | Jalali | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060114848 | Eberle et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060133308 | Madan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060133522 | Sutivong et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060153239 | Julian et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060164993 | Teague et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060203932 | Palanki et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209927 | Khandekar et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060218302 | Chia et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060221810 | Vrcelj et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070206623 | Tiedemann et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211790 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080075184 | Muharemovic et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080137603 | Teague et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080137652 | Herrmann et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20090245421 | Montojo et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100002570 | Walton et al. | Jan 2010 | A9 |
| 20100034164 | Ho et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100182911 | Pullen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20110064039 | Sutivong et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145584 | Coburn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110235685 | Sutivong et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282999 | Teague et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120087336 | Sutivong et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1187930 | Jul 1998 | CN |
| 1254223 | May 2000 | CN |
| 1345518 | Apr 2002 | CN |
| 1394394 | Jan 2003 | CN |
| 19701011 | Jun 1998 | DE |
| 19747369 | May 1999 | DE |
| 0658028 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0768806 | Apr 1997 | EP |
| 0917316 | May 1999 | EP |
| 1039683 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1039683 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 1043861 | Jun 2002 | EP |
| 1265411 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1265411 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1286491 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 1513272 | Mar 2005 | EP |
| 1919152 | May 2008 | EP |
| 2350753 | Dec 2000 | GB |
| 04127738 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 04367135 | Dec 1992 | JP |
| 07327248 | Dec 1995 | JP |
| 09233047 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| 09-266466 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 9266466 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 10-336159 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| 10336159 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| 11-113049 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| 11113049 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| 11261623 | Sep 1999 | JP |
| 11-331121 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 11331121 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 11-346203 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 11346203 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 2000013353 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2000111631 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000504908 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000201134 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2000-252947 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 2000278207 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2001036497 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2002111624 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002111631 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002-152167 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002141837 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002152167 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002152169 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002158631 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002514368 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002164867 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2003060645 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2003060655 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2003078565 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003218826 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2003520499 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2003528527 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 2004007353 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004159345 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004529524 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2004312291 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2004537875 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2005508103 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2005512458 | Apr 2005 | JP |
| 2005-536103 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2005536103 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006505229 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2006-505229 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 030017401 | Mar 2003 | KR |
| 2150174 | May 2000 | RU |
| 508922 | Nov 2002 | TW |
| WO92010890 | Jun 1992 | WO |
| 9408432 | Apr 1994 | WO |
| WO9408432 | Apr 1994 | WO |
| 9730526 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO98014026 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| 9837638 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO9943114 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO99014878 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| 9944316 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO9944316 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO9966748 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| 0161902 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 01076110 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| 0203556 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 0237887 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO0241548 | May 2002 | WO |
| 0249306 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO0249305 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO0249306 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 02073831 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| 0321829 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| 03019852 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO03021829 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO03034645 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO2004015946 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO2004040813 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO2004073219 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO2004079937 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| 2004102815 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2004102816 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO2005074184 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2006022876 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report—PCT/US03/34507—International Search Authority—ISA/US—Jun. 3, 2004. |
| International Preliminary Examination Report—PCT/US03/34507—International Preliminary Examining Authority—IPEA/US—May 18, 2005. |
| Elkashlan M et al, Performance of Frequency-Hopping Multicarrier CDMA on a Uplink with Conference Proceedings, San Francisco, CA Dec. 1-5, 2003, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, NY, NY, IEEE, US, vol. 7 of 7, Dec. 1, 2003, pp. 3407-3411. |
| Gromakov, Ju. A., “Standards and Systems of Mobile Communications (Mobile Radio Communication Standards and Systems)” Moscow: Mobilnye Telesistemy—Eko Trands, 1997, pp. 59-61. |
| Hui Won Je et al, “A Novel Multiple Access Scheme for Uplink Cellular Systems 1,” Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004, VTC2004-fall, 2004 IEEE 60th Los Angeles, CA, US, Sep. 26-29, 2004, Piscataway, NY, pp. 984-988. |
| Roa, et al., “Resource Allocation and Faimess for downlink shared Data channels”, Mar. 16-20, 2003, 2003 IEEE. Wireless Communication and Networking, 2003 WCNC 2003, pp. 1049-1054. |
| Tonello A.M et al. “An Asynchronous Multitone Multiuser Air Interface for High-speed Uplink Communications,” Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003, VTC 2003 Fall, 2003 IEEE 58th, Orlando, FL, US Oct. 6-9, 2003, Piscataway, NJ, US, IEEE, US. |
| Elkashlan M, et al, Performance of Frequency-Hopping Muiticarrier CDMA on a Uplink with Conference Proceedings, San Francisco, CA Dec. 1-5, 2003, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, NY, NY, IEEE, US, vol. 7 of 7, Dec. 1, 2003, pp. 3407-3411. |
| Tonello A.M, et al. “An Asynchronous Multitone Multiuser Air Interface for High-speed Uplink Communications,” Vehicular Technoiogy Conference, 2003, VTC 2003 Fall, 2003 IEEE 58th, Orlando, FL, US Oct. 6-9, 2003, Piscataway, NJ, US, IEEE, US, Oct. 6. |
| Van De Beek, et al., “On Channel Estimation in OFDM Systems,” Proceedings of Vehicular Technology Conference (1995), vol. 2, pp. 815-819, Chicago, USA. |
| “A Time and Frequency Synchronization Scheme for Multiuser OFDM” by JJ Van De Beek et al., IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, No. 11, pp. 1900-1914, Published in Nov. 1999. |
| IEEE Communications Magazine, Apr. 2002, David Falconer et al., Frequency Domain Equalization for Single-Carrier Broadband Wireless Systems, pp. 58-66. |
| Kapoor, S. et al., “Pilot assisted synchronization for wireless OFDM systems over fast time varying fading channels,” Vehicular Technology Conference, 1998. VTC 98. 48th IEEE, May 18, 1998, vol. 3, pp. 2077-2080. |
| Taiwanese Search report—092130051—TIPO—May 19, 2010. |
| Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network: “3GPP TR25.848 V4.0.0 Physical Layer Aspects of UTRA High Speed Downlink Packet Access (Release 4)” 3GPP TR 25.848 V4.0.0, Mar. 2001, pp. 1-89, XP002189517. |
| Yasunori Matsui et al., “A Study on Adaptive Uplink Resource Control Scheme for Asymmetric Packet Radio Communication Systems using OFDMA/TDD Technique,” Technical Report of IEICE, Nov. 10, 2000, vol. 100, No. 435, pp. 63-70, RCS 2000-172 (Abstract). |
| Zhongren Cao et al., “Analysis of two receiver schemes for interleaved OFDMA uplink,” Signals, Systems and Computers, 2002. Conference Record of the Thirty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on, Nov. 3, 2002, vol. 2, pp. 1818-1821. |
| Taiwan Search Report—TW093113201—TIPO—Apr. 26, 2011. |
| European Search Report—EP11174161, Search Authority—The Hague Patent Office, Jan. 8, 2011. |
| European Search Report—EP11174166 , Search Authority—The Hague Patent Office, Jan. 8, 2011. |
| Miller, L. et al., “Cumulative acknowledgement multicast repetition policy for wireless LANs or ad hoc network clusters,” IEEE, Wireless Communication Technologies Group National Institute of Standards and Technology, Maryland Gaithersburg, pp. 3403-3407, (2002). |
| Miyoshi, M. et al.,“Performance Improvement of TCP in wireless cellular network based acknowledgement control”, Department of Infomatics and Mathematical Secience, Gradute School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Japan, Proceedings of the 7th Asia Pacific, pp. 1-15, (2001). |
| Suppplementary European Search Report—EP03781519—Search Authority—The Hauge—Jun. 1, 2011. |
| Coleri, S. et al: “Channel Estimation Techniques Based on Pilot Arrangement in OFDM Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Sep. 1, 2002, pp. 223-229, vol. 48, No. 3, IEEE Service Center, XP011070267, ISSN: 0018-9316. |
| Zhao et al., “A novel channel estimation method for OFDM mobile communication systems based on pilot signals and transform-domain processing” Vehicular Technology Conference, 1997, IEEE 47TH Phoenix, AZ, USA May 4-7, 1997, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, US, vol. 3, May 4, 1997, pp. 2089-2093, XP010229166 ISBN: 0-7803-3659-3. |
| Cai, X., et al., “Group-orthogonal multi-carrier CDMA”, Military Communications Conference. Milcom 2002. Proceedings. Anaheim, CA, Oct. 7-10, 2002; [IEEE Military Communications Conference], New York, NY: IEEE; US, vol. 1, Oct. 7, 2002, pp. 596-601, XP010632171, DOI: 10.1109/Milcom.2002.1180511 ISBN: 978-0-7803-7625-0, Sections I-III. |
| Taiwan Search Report—TW099135629—TIPO—Aug. 22, 2013. |
| Xu, Y., et al., “Group-orthogonal OFDMA in fast time-varying frequency-selective fading environments”, 2004 IEEE 60TH Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC2004-Fall (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37575) IEEE Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, vol. 1, Sep. 26, 2004, pp. 488-492, XP010788423, DOI: 10.1109/VETECF.2004.1400054 ISBN: 978-0-7803-8521-4, abstract, Sections I and III. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060279435 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60422368 | Oct 2002 | US | |
| 60422362 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11138824 | May 2005 | US |
| Child | 11418930 | US | |
| Parent | 10340507 | Jan 2003 | US |
| Child | 11138824 | US |
