The present disclosure relates to double-hung windows, and more particularly to a latch for releasably holding the upper sash in its fully raised closed position.
In double-hung windows having upper and lower sashes that are movable independently of each other, a typical occurrence is that the upper sash settles or lowers from its fully raised closed position. This can occur, for example, when the upper sash balance springs are not strong enough to hold the upper sash closed, or when closing and locking the lower sash tends to pull the upper sash downwardly. A general object of the present disclosure is to provide a releasable detent arrangement for latching the upper sash in its fully raised closed position while at the same time permitting selective lowering of the upper sash.
The present disclosure embodies a number of aspects that can be implemented separately from or in combination with each other.
A building window in accordance with one aspect of the disclosure includes a generally rectangular frame having an upper rail and opposed side rails. An upper sash and a lower sash are independently movably mounted in the frame. A pair of opposed spring detents are mounted on the side rails adjacent to the upper rail of the frame. A pair of laterally opposed latches are at upper corners of the upper sash at positions to engage the spring detents as the upper sash is moved to its fully raised position. The latches cooperate with the spring detents to hold the upper sash in its fully raised position and are releasable from the spring detents to permit lowering of the upper sash.
Each spring detent preferably has a resilient arm positioned to be engaged by the associated latch as the upper sash is moved toward its fully raised position. The resilient arm preferably has a cam portion that is angulated and disposed to be engaged by the associated latch as the upper sash is raised. Each spring detent preferably also includes a second portion with a ledge for supporting the latch in the fully raised position of the upper sash. Each latch preferably includes a spring-biased latch bolt for camming the resilient arm of the spring detent laterally outwardly as the upper sash is raised and for resting on the ledge portion of the spring detent.
The disclosure, together with additional objects, features, advantages and aspects thereof, will best be understood from the following description, the appended claims and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Latch mechanism 34 includes a spring detent 36 mounted on frame side rail 26 adjacent to frame upper rail 24, and a latch 38 mounted at the upper corner of upper sash 30 at a position to engage spring detent 36 as upper sash 30 is moved to its fully raised position. Spring detent 36 (FIGS. 2 and 4-9) includes a base 39 and an arm 40 resiliently integrally interconnected by an inverted U-shaped connection portion 42. Base 39, in the embodiment of the spring detent illustrated in
Latch 38 (
There thus has been disclosed a building window upper sash latch arrangement that fully satisfies all of the objects and aims previously set forth. The disclosure has been presented in conjunction with several exemplary embodiments, and additional modifications and variations have been discussed. Other modifications and variations readily will suggest themselves to persons of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the latches 38 also can be (and preferably would be) configured as tilt latches to permit tilting of upper sash 38 for cleaning purposes for example. The disclosure is intended to embrace all such modifications and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
21968 | Judd | Nov 1858 | A |
178292 | Hale | Jun 1876 | A |
449895 | Bangs | Apr 1891 | A |
517602 | Cole | Apr 1894 | A |
690440 | Kemp | Jan 1902 | A |
692532 | Maloon | Feb 1902 | A |
754452 | Howe | Mar 1904 | A |
764493 | Noseworthy | Jul 1904 | A |
832505 | Sawyer | Oct 1906 | A |
861070 | Wynn | Jul 1907 | A |
1038199 | Rast | Sep 1912 | A |
1066141 | Parsons | Jul 1913 | A |
1259115 | Lunken | Mar 1918 | A |
1313840 | Strom et al. | Aug 1919 | A |
1426445 | Anderson | Aug 1922 | A |
1469659 | McGuire | Oct 1923 | A |
1530385 | McGuire | Mar 1925 | A |
1540525 | Anderson | Jun 1925 | A |
1578386 | Bingham | Mar 1926 | A |
1587037 | Rudolph | Jun 1926 | A |
1672369 | Chaffee | Jun 1928 | A |
1841890 | Hannon | Jan 1932 | A |
2208610 | Swallow | Jul 1940 | A |
2287978 | De Smet | Jun 1942 | A |
3094347 | May | Jun 1963 | A |
3377648 | Bloom | Apr 1968 | A |
4238907 | Swan | Dec 1980 | A |
4420907 | Swan | Dec 1983 | A |
4482178 | Damiana | Nov 1984 | A |
4923230 | Simpson | May 1990 | A |
5013073 | Pehr | May 1991 | A |
5192109 | Roberts | Mar 1993 | A |
6607221 | Elliott | Aug 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070227075 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |