The present invention relates to the structure of an upper side, in particular a paper side for a multilayer papermaking-machine fabric. The papermaking-machine fabric, in particular, is intended for use in the wet end in a papermaking machine.
In the wet end of a papermaking machine, the sheet of paper is formed on one or between two papermaking machine fabrics, depending on the machine type. Here a suspension of approximately 1% fiber substances and auxiliary substances and 99% water is uniformly delivered onto the papermaking machine fabric. The solid components contained are separated from the water by a filtration process. By using different drainage elements as far as the end of the wet end, usually a solid portion or dry content from 20 to 22% is attained. The paper produced in this way is already sufficiently solid so that it is transferred to the press end and can be further dried. In modern papermaking machines such as gap formers, the technique for executing this filtration process has been improved to such an extent that at speeds of 2,000 m/minutes and more, much less than one second is necessary for this purpose.
While a series of quantities in paper technology, such as the degree of whiteness, tensile strength and extension, are determined by the raw materials and auxiliary substances used, the sheet forming fabrics have a major effect on the substance weight profile and transverse thickness profile, the fiber retention and the fabric marking which is visible in the paper. In particular, in the area of graphic papers, these quality requirements are high. These quality requirements are opposed by the fact that visibly lower quality raw materials such as scrap paper are used and that by reducing the substance weight the attempt is made to save raw materials and thus money.
In the development of sheet forming fabrics for papermaking machines, a reaction rather early to these trends and various solutions was implemented to reach a compromise between a fineness of the paper side as high as possible and a machine side as durable and coarse as possible to achieve a high wear life time and overall high stability of the wire cloth.
To meet these requirements, double-layer wire cloths were developed characterized by a longitudinal thread system with at least two transverse thread systems, at least one transverse thread system being woven in solely on the paper side and the second exclusively on the machine side. Some embodiments of these sheet forming fabrics can be found among others in the following patent documents: EP 0 186 406 A3, DE 31 43 433 A, DE 25 40 490 B2, DE 22 63 476 B2, DE 38 17 144 A1, DE 38 01 051 A1, DE 39 10 019 A1, and in DE 41 07 633 C2.
Although this type of sheet forming fabric is also often used today, all these cloths are characterized by a comparatively low water permeability due to the machine direction threads which are located tightly next to one another. Furthermore, with this type of cloth it is not possible to produce an ideal paper side recognized as a linen weave and to join it to a lower cloth. Accordingly, frequently unwanted markings occur in the paper.
To remedy these disadvantages, efforts have been made to develop a fabric in which the paper side has a linen weave. The three-layer composite cloths have at least two separate cloth layers, with the upper layer characterized by the linen weave and connected in a suitable manner to the other cloth layers. To join the layers to one another, in the known solutions separate binding threads are used forming both the longitudinal threads and also the transverse direction threads. Furthermore, this connection can also be produced in that longitudinal and transverse thread systems of one cloth are tied into the other cloth by the binding threads changing over from one cloth layer into the next and vice versa. Some examples of this can be found in the following documents: DE 33 18 985 A1, DE 42 29 828 C2, DE 29 17 694 C2, EP 01 093 096 B1, EP 0 069 101 B1, EP 0 097 966 B1 and WO 93/00472.
With these types of known cloths, the uniformity of the upper side could be improved such that the marking left in the paper is much less than for a two-layer fabric. Also, permeability was maintained for a comparatively large number of threads on the paper side. This led to increased use of three-layer fabrics for the indicated graphic papers.
But the multilayer structure greatly increases the thickness of the papermaking machine fabric, by which more material can be intercalated in the cloth and the drainage performance is reduced in this way. Another disadvantage of the three-layer composite cloth relates to the joining of the layers. The individual cloth layers connected to one another by binding threads extending in the papermaking machine are often stressed in bending by deflections, relative to a neutral phase in the middle of the fabric, one layer undergoing stretching, at the same time the fabric layer opposite the neutral phase being shortened. Loosening of the cloth connection generally then occurs. This loosening can lead to shifting of the layers in the advanced stage with separation of the cloth layers occurring in the extreme case, leading to the papermaking machine fabric becoming unusable.
In DE 100 30 650 C1, to counteract layer separation, the machine direction threads can be used as binding threads with the result that by changing the longitudinal thread or machine direction threads from the paper to the machine side and vice versa the stretching and shortening of the two cloth sides are equalized. Even this type of weave cannot compensate for the structure-induced higher thickness of the composite cloth with its reduced drainage performance.
An object of the present invention is to provide an improved upper or paper side of a papermaking machine fabric implementing the advantages of a linen weave, and yet having a simple, compact and durable structure for the cloth in addition to the papermaking machine fabric for which the cloth is used.
This object is basically achieved by a fabric upper side and a papermaking machine fabric where the upper or paper side has a plurality of longitudinal threads woven with a plurality of transverse threads to form repeats in the longitudinal and transverse directions. The transverse thread repeat contains three times as many threads as the longitudinal thread repeat. The longitudinal thread repeat has at least of three threads, while the transverse thread repeat has at least nine threads. All longitudinal threads extend in alternation over three transverse threads and under three transverse threads and then under the remaining transverse threads. Two directly adjacent longitudinal threads in the longitudinal direction are shifted against one another by at least three transverse threads.
The upper side according to the present invention is made in an approximation to the longstanding linen weave and in this respect allows production of mark free paper. The special execution of the upper side allows high drainage. If the upper side is provided with the correspondingly suited additional cloth layers on the lower side, a compact and durable structure is achieved which counteracts the unwanted separation of layers. The upper or paper side can be economically obtained on conventional weaving means so that special, expensive mechanical means can be dispensed with. By using at least three machine direction threads, additional machine-side transverse direction threads can be tied in and, for purposes of an ideal linen weave, high uniformity for the upper side or upper cloth layer of a papermaking machine fabric is achieved.
This weave principle can be extended to almost any number of longitudinal threads in the repeat and can be easily implemented for three, five and six longitudinal threads within one repeat. The more longitudinal threads in the repeat, the more the length ratio of the longitudinal threads to the transverse direction threads on the upper side shifts in the direction of the transverse direction threads. In this respect the weave becomes increasingly wider. In theory, this aspect is detrimental to the uniformity of the paper side, but produces increasingly better support for the paper fibers emerging mainly lengthwise from the stock inlet of the papermaking machine. Depending on the requirements arising in practice, in this simple way the upper side can be easily matched to the prevailing circumstances.
In one especially advantageous embodiment of the invention, the upper side is delivered to heat setting. As a result of the heat setting, longitudinal extension and conversion of the cloth structure occur, in which the longitudinal threads in the region in which they bind with the upper transverse threads no longer extend strictly vertically or in the longitudinal direction, but are oriented slightly diagonally.
The integration of the machine-side transverse threads, that is, of the lower cloth, with the upper cloth or the upper side, can take place in many ways. In one preferred embodiment, the ratio of three upper transverse threads to two lower transverse threads is chosen. The pitch of the lower cloth is preferably two here. This arrangement corresponds to the pick ratio. The pick repeat of the lower cloth is chosen to be twice as long to implement a floatation of the lower transverse threads extending over eight shafts. Fundamentally, other transverse thread ratios are also conceivable here. Also, the length of the floatation of the lower transverse threads can take place in integral multiples of the upper longitudinal thread repeat.
Other objects, advantages and salient features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, taken in conjunction with the annexed drawings, discloses preferred embodiments of the present invention.
Referring to the drawings which form a part of this disclosure:
a) is a diagrammatic representation of a longitudinal thread repeat of three threads and a transverse thread repeat of nine threads;
b) is a diagrammatic representation of a longitudinal thread repeat of four threads and a transverse thread repeat of twelve threads;
c) is a diagrammatic representation of a longitudinal thread repeat of five threads and a transverse thread repeat of 15 threads;
d) is a diagrammatic representation of a longitudinal thread repeat of six threads and a transverse thread repeat of 18 threads;
The present invention relates to a multilayer papermaking machine fabric having one paper side which is intended to correspond in an approximation to the conventional linen weave (cf.
If the ideal conventional linen weave is examined more closely, as shown in
Under the condition thread number=2/thread diameter, the distance 102 and 105 between the adjacent meshes is equal to the mesh width 106 and the mesh length 103. In order to approximate the pertinent linen-like upper side as closely as possible, the solution according to the present invention among other things calls for the following:
In
The longitudinal thread 22 directly adjacent to the right runs analogously, but shifted up by three transverse threads. The picks missing at the top are added underneath the starting point. This displacement is conventionally referred to with the term “pitch”. The longitudinal thread 22 therefore begins on the transverse thread 4 and subsequently runs like the longitudinal thread 21.
b) shows one preferred embodiment of the solution according to the present invention with a longitudinal thread repeat of four threads 21 to 24. The transverse thread repeat thus amounts to twelve threads 1 to 12 and thus a length which is three times as long as the longitudinal thread repeat. Here the first six picks 1 to 6 are also integrated by the longitudinal thread 21 in alternation over 1, 3, and 4 and under 2, 4, and 6. The remaining picks 7 to 12 remain underneath the longitudinal thread 21. Comparable arrangements arise for the other longitudinal threads 22, 23, and 24.
The schematically woven surface according to the weave diagrams shown in
If a conventional heat setting process is employed for the plastic threads used, by changing the longitudinal extension during heat setting, a conversion of the structure arises which is shown schematically in
The longitudinal threads 21 to 24″′ in the region in which they bind with the upper transverse threads 1 to 5 no longer run or extend aligned strictly vertically or in the longitudinal direction, but are slightly diagonally oriented. Along the longitudinal thread 21, for example, viewed in
This weave principle can be extended to almost any number of longitudinal threads in the repeat. This extension is shown by example in
In the first embodiment the first longitudinal thread 21 alternately binds with the first six transverse threads 1 to 6 over and under and then runs or extends only underneath the remaining transverse threads 7 to 12. Each of the next longitudinal threads 22, 23, and 24 within the repeat rise by three transverse threads respectively, in this instance up to the right. As in any weave, essentially a pitch to the left is also possible, as a result of which then a mirror image of the surface would result (not shown).
In the embodiments as shown in
In the fourth embodiment shown in
The surface used here corresponds to the embodiment of
While various embodiments have been chosen to illustrate the invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 016 660 | Apr 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2006/012272 | 12/20/2006 | WO | 00 | 10/7/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/115591 | 10/18/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6244306 | Troughton | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253796 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6334467 | Barrett et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6354335 | Taipale et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379506 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6413377 | Wright | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427728 | Maguire et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6533901 | Taipale | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6585006 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6904942 | Odenthal | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7048829 | Heger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20040238063 | Stone | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
22 63 476 | Mar 1974 | DE |
25 40 490 | Apr 1976 | DE |
29 17 694 | Dec 1979 | DE |
31 43 433 | May 1983 | DE |
33 18 985 | Nov 1984 | DE |
38 01 051 | Jul 1989 | DE |
38 17 144 | Nov 1989 | DE |
39 10 019 | Oct 1990 | DE |
41 07 633 | Dec 1991 | DE |
42 29 828 | Mar 1994 | DE |
100 30 650 | May 2002 | DE |
0 097 966 | Jan 1984 | EP |
0 186 406 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0 069 101 | May 1987 | EP |
1 093 096 | Apr 2001 | EP |
2 391 557 | Feb 2004 | GB |
WO 9300472 | Jan 1993 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090308482 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |