Priority is claimed on Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-221322, filed Nov. 16, 2017, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to an upright piano provided with an acoustic resonator.
Standing waves generated in the cabinet of an upright piano influence the frequency characteristic of the acoustic space. For example, a phenomenon occurs in which the sounds of frequencies corresponding to specific keys are heard intensified or attenuated. Conventionally, as a technique for suppressing standing waves generated in the acoustic space, resonator sound absorption using a resonance tube is known.
Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2012-185330 describes an electronic musical instrument that adjusts the frequency characteristic by controlling the fixed vibration mode of a specific resonance frequency generated in the housing during sound emission. It is possible to reduce the sound pressure of a specific frequency in the housing by arranging the opening of the acoustic resonator in at least one of the antinodes of sound pressure in the fixed vibration mode of a specific frequency.
However, in the electronic musical instrument described in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2012-185330, the frequency characteristic in the housing sometimes changes by arranging an acoustic resonator in the housing. An upright piano has a wider dynamic range than an electronic musical instrument and also has a complicated frequency characteristic. As a result, arranging an acoustic resonator in the case of an upright piano can lead to unintended effects on the frequency characteristic, such as for example disturbance of the sound field inside the case in the high-frequency band.
In addition, when the opening of the acoustic resonator is positioned at the antinode of sound pressure in a fixed vibration mode at a plurality of frequencies, the acoustic resonator reduces the sound pressure of unintended frequencies, and in some cases, leads to the occurrence of unintended effects on the frequency characteristic.
Also, when arranging the acoustic resonator in the case of an upright piano, it is necessary to avoid impairing the external appearance as much as possible.
The present invention was achieved in view of the above circumstances. The object of the present invention is to provide an upright piano that, by having an acoustic resonator disposed in a case thereof, is capable of suppressing standing waves of a specific resonance frequency generated in the case, with unintended effects on the frequency characteristic being minimal and the external appearance not being impaired.
In order to solve the above-mentioned problem, an upright piano according to the present invention includes a case including an upper front board, a key bed disposed below the upper front board, and a lower front board disposed below the key bed, defining an internal space; and a resonance tube, provided with a hollow region and an opening, disposed in the internal space, in which the opening is disposed at a left or right end side of either a lower end side of the upper front board or an upper end side of the lower front board.
Hereinafter, an upright piano 100 according to a first embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The soundboard 51 is disposed below the pin board 22. The strings 52, as sounding bodies, are stretched over the surface of the soundboard 51 facing the keys 41. The action mechanism 53 and the damper mechanism 54 are provided above the rear end portion of the keys 41. The action mechanism 53 is a mechanism for converting a key depression force with which the player's finger depresses the key 41 into a string-striking force with which a hammer 55 strikes the string 52. The damper mechanism 54 converts the key depression force that depresses the key 41 and a stepping force of the player stepping on a damper pedal 33 into a string separation force that causes the damper 56 to separate from the strings 52.
As shown in
The pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L has substantially the same outer shape as a pilaster of an upright piano except for the opening. The right side 13 is screwed to the upper front board 20 so that the first end 11 is the lower end and the second end 12 is the upper end, and the left side 14 is in contact with the side board 23L.
Since the front side 15 is a portion exposed to the outside of the case 2, it is preferable that the front side 15 be painted similarly to a typical pilaster.
The sound absorbing member 18 is made of urethane foam, that serves as resistance against the movement of gas particles and inhibits the movement of the gas particles. The sound absorbing member 18 exhibits a high sound absorbing effect by being disposed at a place of high particle speeds. Standing waves generated in the hollow region 17 of the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L suffer energy dissipation caused by the sound absorbing member 18 provided at the opening 10. As a result, it is possible to adjust the degree of suppression of standing waves in the upright piano.
Here, a material other than urethane foam can be used as long as the material prevents movement of gas particles and generates (increases) resistance to that movement. Urethane foam is an example of an open-cell porous material, but an open-cell porous material using another resin material (for example, a foamed resin) may be used. Further, a material having at least partially a closed cell porous material may be used.
In addition, members applicable to the sound absorbing member 18 are not limited to those with many-holed structures, and include structures which can be regarded as porous to sound waves. Examples include members that form a structure that can be regarded as a porous material due to entanglement of glass fibers, such as glass wool. Included among these members are not only those formed by weaving fabric material but also those formed without weaving fabric material (for example, non-woven fabric, metallic fiber board). In addition, it is also possible to use various materials for the sound absorbing material 18 such as metal (for example, aluminum foam metal, metallic fiber board), wood (for example, wood chips or fragments thereof), paper (wood fiber, pulp fiber), glass (for example, a microperforated panel, micro-hole panel, and one in which fine pores are formed by etching treatment), animal and plant fibers (bovine felt, recovered wool felt, wool, cotton, nonwoven fabric, cloth, synthetic fiber, wood powder molding material, paper molding material).
In the following description, as shown in
The double-dotted and dashed line shown in
As shown in
The standing wave SW1 develops by the occurrence of resonance in the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L in response to sound waves of wavelength λc (L=λc/4) corresponding to four times the length L of the hollow region 17. At this time, the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L radiates a reflected wave, which is a reflected wave caused by resonance and having a phase different from the phase of the incident wave, to the external space via the first end 11. In accordance with the phase difference between the reflected wave and the incident wave at this time, sound waves of the resonance frequency corresponding to the wavelength κc interfere and cancel each other. Thereby the effect is exhibited of reducing the sound pressure in the vicinity of the first end 11 centered on the resonance frequency of the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L. As a result, the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L can suppress standing waves at the resonance frequency in the acoustic space (internal space) of the case 2.
That is, assuming that the resonance frequency of the standing wave to be suppressed in the acoustic space in the case 2 is a resonance frequency that easily resonates in the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L (hereinafter referred to as “first resonance frequency”), the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L can suppress the standing wave of the resonance frequency in the acoustic space in the case 2. The pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L is adjusted so as to facilitate resonance at the first resonance frequency.
In the upright piano 100 according to the present embodiment, standing waves having a resonance frequency of about 180 Hz, which cause a “muffled sound,” are targeted for suppression, among standing waves that can occur in the acoustic space inside the case. That is, the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L is adjusted so as to suppress the generation of standing waves with a resonance frequency of about 180 Hz (the first resonance frequency) in the acoustic space inside the case of the upright piano 100. In the present embodiment, the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L is adjusted so that the primary resonance frequency of the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L is about 180 Hz (the first resonance frequency).
The adjustment of the resonance frequency of the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L is mainly performed by the length L of the hollow region 17, but fine adjustment can be performed by the sound absorbing member 18. For example, by increasing the area exposed to the opening 10 of the sound absorbing member 18 disposed in the vicinity of the opening 10, the resonance frequency can be lowered by utilizing the transition property from tube resonance to Helmholtz resonance.
As shown in
The pair of pilaster-shaped acoustic resonators 1L and 1R of the present embodiment are designed to suppress the occurrence of the “muffled sound” in the vicinity of 180 Hz. Each opening 10 is arranged in proximity to the position of the “antinode” of sound pressure of low-order standing waves (that is, closer to the position of the antinode of the sound pressure compared to the position of the node of the sound pressure). Thereby, compared to the case of being disposed at a location where the “antinode” of the sound pressure is not positioned, it is possible to favorably suppress standing waves of the first resonance frequency in the acoustic space inside the case 2.
Conversely, each of the openings 10 is disposed in proximity to the “node”, rather than the position of the “antinode”, of sound pressure of high-order standing waves (that is, closer to the position of the node of the sound pressure compared to the position of the antinode of the sound pressure). Therefore, suppression of high-order standing waves in the acoustic space inside the case 2 hardly occurs.
By disposing the opening 10 of each of the pair of pilaster-shaped acoustic resonators 1L and 1R at the aforementioned position, it is possible to favorably suppress low-order standing waves that are the target of suppression, and it is possible to reduce unintended effects on high-order standing waves which are not the target of suppression.
Further, as shown in
According to the upright piano 100 provided with the acoustic resonator 1 of this embodiment configured as described above, standing waves of the first resonance frequency generated in the case 2 can be suppressed. By arranging the opening 10 in proximity to the “antinode” of sound pressure of low-order standing waves, it is possible to suppress the occurrence of low-order standing waves, which are the cause of “sound muffling”.
Further, according to the upright piano 100 including the acoustic resonator 1 of the present embodiment, the opening 10 is arranged in proximity to the “node” of sound pressure of high-order standing waves. Therefore, suppression of high-order standing waves in the acoustic space inside the case 2 hardly occurs.
Further, according to the upright piano 100 including the acoustic resonator of the present embodiment, the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1 has almost the same external appearance as a pilaster and is arranged replacing each pilaster. Therefore, disturbance of the sound field in the acoustic space is hardly caused, and unintended effects on the frequency characteristic are minimal. Furthermore, the external appearance of the acoustic piano is not impaired.
An experiment was carried out to measure the internal sound pressure of the upright piano 100 provided with the pair of pilaster-shaped acoustic resonators 1L and 1R (that is, having resonance tubes) and the internal sound pressure of an upright piano provided with existing pilasters 2aL and 2aR instead of the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonators 1L and 1R (that is, not having resonance tubes). In the experiment, a speaker was arranged in the case of each upright piano and made to reproduce white noise, with the sound pressure at one point in the case of the upright piano being measured. The pair of pilaster-shaped acoustic resonators 1L and 1R were adjusted so that the first-order resonance frequency was around 180 Hz (the first resonance frequency) similarly to the first embodiment.
While the first embodiment of the present invention has been described and illustrated in detail heretofore with reference to the drawings, it should be understood that specific constitutions are not limited to the present embodiments. Additions, omissions, substitutions, and other modifications can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be considered as being limited by the foregoing description, and is only limited by the scope of the appended claims. In addition, the constituent elements shown in the first embodiment and the modification examples described below can be combined appropriately.
(Modification 1)
For example, in the above-described embodiment, the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonators 1L and 1R replaced the pilasters, but the members to be replaced are not limited to the pilasters. For example, the acoustic resonator may be formed in the shape of the side board or the key bed to replace all or part of the side board or key bed. When the acoustic resonator is arranged in a manner replacing an existing member, disturbance of the sound field in the acoustic space is hardly caused, and unintended effects on the frequency characteristic are minimal. Furthermore, the external appearance of the acoustic piano is not impaired.
(Modification 2)
For example, in the above-described embodiment, the pilaster-shaped acoustic resonators 1L and 1R replaced both the right and left pilasters, but the mode of arrangement of the acoustic resonators is not limited thereto. As an acoustic resonator, only either one of the pair of pilaster-shaped acoustic resonators 1L and 1R may be disposed in a manner replacing a pilaster. Even if only one of the pilasters is replaced, it is still possible to suppress the generation of standing waves of the first resonance frequency, and moreover it is possible to reduce the installation cost.
(Modification 3)
For example, although the aforesaid pilaster-shaped acoustic resonators 1L and 1R are resonance tubes in the above embodiment, the mode of the acoustic resonator is not limited thereto. The acoustic resonator may be, for example, a Helmholtz resonator. Also, the acoustic resonator may be a resonance tube with openings at both ends. Any type of acoustic resonator may be used as long as the resonator is one that can be arranged in a manner replacing a part of the case.
A second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to
As shown in
As shown in
The case 2B excluding the acoustic resonator 1B has the same configuration as a typical upright piano. That is, in the upright piano 200, the case 2B is one in which the acoustic resonator 1B is added to a case of a typical upright piano.
The acoustic resonator 1B has the same configuration as the abovementioned pilaster-shaped acoustic resonator 1L of the first embodiment. As shown in
In each of the graphs shown in
As shown in
Conversely, as shown in
According to the upright piano 200 provided with the acoustic resonator of this embodiment configured as described above, it is possible to suppress standing waves of the first resonance frequency generated in the case 2B. The acoustic resonator 1B is arranged at the left and right end side of the acoustic space inside the case 2B. Therefore, even if a pair of the acoustic resonators 1B are disposed at these locations, disturbance of the sound field in the acoustic space is hardly caused, and unintended influence on the frequency characteristic is small.
In addition, according to the upright piano 200 including the acoustic resonator of the present embodiment, by arranging the opening 10 in the vicinity of the “antinodes” of sound pressure of low-order standing waves as in the first embodiment, it is possible to suppress the occurrence of low-order standing waves, which are a cause of “sound muffling”. Further, the opening 10 is disposed near the “nodes” of sound pressure of high-order standing waves. Therefore, suppression of high-order standing waves in the acoustic space inside the case 2B hardly occurs.
Further, according to the upright piano 200 provided with the acoustic resonator of the present embodiment, compared with the case in which the acoustic resonator 1 is disposed in a manner replacing an existing member of the upright piano as in the first embodiment, it is possible to easily arrange the resonator 1 in the case 2B.
While the second embodiment of the present invention has been described and illustrated in detail heretofore with reference to the drawings, it should be understood that specific constitutions are not limited to the present embodiments. Additions, omissions, substitutions, and other modifications can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be considered as being limited by the foregoing description, and is only limited by the scope of the appended claims. In addition, the constituent elements shown in the second embodiment and the modification examples described below can be combined appropriately.
(Modification)
In the second embodiment, the acoustic resonator 1B is attached to the lower front board 21, but the place of attaching the acoustic resonator 1B is not limited thereto provided the place of attachment is the acoustic space (internal space) of the case. FIG. 9 is a perspective view showing the entire configuration of an upright piano 200B according to a modification of the upright piano 200.
As shown in
Also in the upright piano 200B, similarly to the first embodiment, by disposing the opening 10 in the vicinity of the “antinodes” of sound pressure of low-order standing waves, it is possible to suppress the occurrence of low-order standing waves, which are a cause of “sound muffling”. Further, the opening 10 is arranged near the “nodes” of sound pressure of high-order standing waves. Therefore, suppression of high-order standing waves in the acoustic space inside the case 2B hardly occurs.
The acoustic resonator 1B can exhibit the same effect as the aforedescribed embodiments by arranging the opening 10 in the vicinity of the “antinodes” of sound pressure of low-order standing waves and in the vicinity of “nodes” of sound pressure of high-order standing waves in the sound pressure distribution shown in
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to provide an upright piano that, by having an acoustic resonator disposed in a case thereof, is capable of suppressing standing waves of a specific resonance frequency generated in the case by an acoustic resonator being disposed in the case, with unintended effects on the frequency characteristic being minimal and the external appearance not being impaired.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2017-221322 | Nov 2017 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
163745 | Colley | May 1875 | A |
186397 | Zachariae | Jan 1877 | A |
758694 | Riggins | May 1904 | A |
807714 | Beum | Dec 1905 | A |
831852 | Freeborne | Sep 1906 | A |
877839 | Field | Jan 1908 | A |
948391 | Danquard et al. | Feb 1910 | A |
1121166 | Clark | Dec 1914 | A |
1129443 | Billings | Feb 1915 | A |
1530984 | Crippen | Mar 1925 | A |
1664191 | Collen | Mar 1928 | A |
2081704 | Heller | May 1937 | A |
2087033 | Huseby | Jul 1937 | A |
2255865 | Watts | Sep 1941 | A |
2412212 | Gerlat | Dec 1946 | A |
2948179 | Itoikawa | Aug 1960 | A |
3669214 | Matsuura | Jun 1972 | A |
4377102 | Mayerjak | Mar 1983 | A |
7301084 | Okada | Nov 2007 | B2 |
9779711 | Ohnishi | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20120222541 | Ishimura et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012185330 | Sep 2012 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190147835 A1 | May 2019 | US |