This patent specification pertains to x-ray imaging of the breast and, more specifically, to a system for selectively imaging a breast of an upright patient in one or more of a CT mode, one or more tomosynthesis modes (e.g., narrow angle breast tomosynthesis and wide angle breast tomosynthesis), and a mammography mode. The system preferably is integrated so that the equipment can be used for any one or more of these imaging modes. The patient can be standing, as is typical for mammography and tomosynthesis, rather than lying down as in conventional CT. In the CT mode, the imaging x-ray beam passes only through the breast, not through the patient's torso as when a conventional CT system is used to image the breast.
X-ray mammography is the established screening modality for breast cancer and other lesions, and also has been relied on for diagnostic and other purposes. Historically, the breast image has been recorded on x-ray film but more recently digital x-ray image receptors have come into wide use, as in the mammography system available under the trade name Selenia from the common assignee hereof, Hologic Inc. of Bedford, Mass., and from its division Lorad Corporation of Danbury, Conn. In mammography, typically a pyramid-shaped x-ray beam passes through the compressed breast and forms a two-dimensional projection image, namely, a mammogram identified herein as images M. Any one of a number of orientations can be used, such as CC (cranial-caudal) or MLO (mediolateral-oblique).
More recently, breast x-ray tomosynthesis has come into use. The common assignee has installed breast tomosynthesis systems for clinical use in this country and has sold such systems overseas. The technology typically involves taking two-dimensional (2D) projection images, identified herein as images Tp, of the immobilized breast at each of a number of angles of the x-ray beam relative to the breast. The resulting x-ray measurements are computer-processed to reconstruct images, identified herein as images Tr, of breast slices that typically are in planes transverse to the x-ray beam axis, such as parallel to the image plane of a mammogram of the same breast, but can be at any other orientation and can represent breast slices of selected thicknesses. The range of angles is substantially less than in conventional CT (computerized tomography), i.e. substantially less than 180° plus a fan angle, e.g., a range of ±15°.
An example of a breast x-ray tomosynthesis system is the common assignee's system available under the trade name Selenia Dimensions that is sold overseas and has been installed for clinical testing in this country and includes both a tomosynthesis mode of operation and a mammogram mode of operation. See also U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,684 and U.S. patent application publications 2005/0113681 A1 and 2009/0003519 A1, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,496,557, 5,051,904, 5,359,637, 6,289,235, 6,375,352, 6,645,520, 6,647,092, 6,882,700, 6,970,531, 6,940,943 7,356,113, 7,656,994, published U.S. Patent Applications Nos. 2004/0066904 and 2007/0263765, and Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis (GE Brochure 98-5493, November 1998). How to reconstruct tomosynthesis images is discussed in D G Grant, “Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional imaging technique”, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering, Vol BME-19, #1, (January 1972), pp 20-28. See, also, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/628,516, filed Nov. 15, 2004, and entitled “Matching geometry generation and display of mammograms and tomosynthesis images,” and a system announced under the name Giotto Image 3D by a I.M.S. Internazionale Medico Scintifica of Bologna, Italy. Mammography and tomography systems can also be used in interventional procedures, such as biopsy, by adding a biopsy station (for example, the system available from the common assignee under the trade name StereoLoc II Upright Stereotactic Breast Biopsy System). The patents, applications, brochures, and article cited above, as well as those cited below, are hereby incorporated by reference in this patent specification as though fully set forth herein.
X-ray breast imaging systems that can selectively take tomosynthesis projection images and conventional mammograms, such as the system available under the trade name Selenia Dimensions system, are known. They include an x-ray source and an x-ray imaging receptor that can be held in a fixed relationship to each other and moved as a unit to take conventional mammograms M, and can be decoupled from each other so that at least one can move relative to the other and to the patient's breast to take tomosynthesis projection images Tp. See also commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,583,786.
CT technology has not been widely used for x-ray imaging of the breast. In conventional CT, the patient is lying down on a gurney or platform while the x-ray source and detectors rotate about the patient. The x-ray measurements are reconstructed into images, referred herein as images CTr, of typically planar slices of the patient. The imaging planes that intersect the breast also intersect the torso and so the patient's body is unnecessarily subjected to x-radiation when only an x-ray image of the breast is of interest. In addition, the use of conventional CT for breast images can be unduly expensive. There have been proposals for CT systems that would image only the breast, without imaging the torso as well, but they require the patient to be in a prone position and also have not found wide use. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,973,126, proposing to suspend the breast of a prone patient into an opening around which an x-ray source and an x-ray detector would rotate in a horizontal plane. See also U.S. Pat. No. 6,987,831, proposing a very similar arrangement that uses more modem components. In addition, published U.S. patent publication 2010/0080343 A1 proposes a breast CT system in which the patient's breast protrudes through an opening in a vertical wall to thereby extend to the other side of the wall, where a gantry rotates an x-ray source and detector in a spiral scan motion or successive slice scan motion to image the protruding portions of the breast.
It can be desirable for a number of reasons to assess different types of x-ray images of a patient's breast. For example, over decades of reading conventional mammograms M, medical professionals have developed valuable interpretation expertise. Mammograms M may offer good visualization of micro calcifications, and may offer higher spatial resolution compared with tomosynthesis images Tp or Tr. Tomosynthesis images Tr may have different desirable characteristics—e.g., they may offer better visualization of structures that can be obscured by overlying or underlying tissue in a conventional mammogram M. CT images CTr can offer other benefits, such as the ability to obtain attenuation values for specific tissue inside the breast and to generate a three-dimensional image of volume elements (voxels) in the breast that is generally free of geometric distortions and thus can be conveniently re-processed into images of breast slices at any orientation and with any thickness. However, no system is known to the inventors herein that would make it possible to select which one or more of these three types of breast images to take with a single system, without moving the patient from one imaging system to another and perhaps from one medical facility to another.
It also can be desirable to co-register breast images taken with different x-ray modalities, e.g., so that the same real or suspected lesion can be viewed and assessed in the images from two or more modalities, as each modality may contribute different information about the lesion. While some aspects of co-registration have been provided for tomosynthesis images Tr and Tp and mammograms M (see, e.g., commonly owned U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,577,282 and 7,616,909), no co-registration is known for x-ray CT breast images, especially if taken from an upright patent, with Tr, Tp, and M x-ray images of the breast.
This patent specification describes a multi-mode system that includes an x-ray CT system taking CT breast x-ray images CTr of an upright patient positioned with respect to the system in a way similar to a patient's position relative to a conventional mammography system, while providing protection from moving assemblies using a design uniquely suited to x-ray CT scanning of the breast. The same system can be configured to selectively take not CT but tomosynthesis images Tp and Tr in one of at least two tomosynthesis modes, such as a wide angle mode and a narrow angle mode. And, the same system can be configured to selectively take mammograms M that are essentially the same as, or are similar in appearance to, conventional mammograms taken with a mammography system. Thus, the same system can operate in any one, or any two or more, of several modes for breast imaging: a CT mode, plural tomosynthesis modes including for example a wide angle tomosynthesis mode and a narrow angle tomosynthesis mode, and a mammography mode. Breast images of the patent can be taken in a single one of these modes, or in two or more of these modes, while the patient's breast remains immobilized, or in different immobilizations of the breast during the same study, or at different times. Preferably, the imaging x-ray receptor is a two-dimensional receptor that can image the entire breast in the mammography mode, so that preferably the same receptor can be used in the CT scan mode in a single rotational motion, thus avoiding the need to scan multiple times around the breast in order to acquire x-ray measurements for multiple slices of the breast.
In describing examples and preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the disclosure of this patent specification is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected and it is to be understood that each specific element includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner.
When operating in a CT mode, the system of
A unique challenge arises because of the upright position of the patient and the rotation of x-ray tube 108 and receptor housing 110 through a large angle in the CT mode of operation. As known, CT scanning typically involves a rotation of the source and receptor through an angle of 180° plus the angle subtended by the imaging x-ray beam, and preferably a rotation through a greater angle, e.g., 360°. However, if the rotation includes the 0° position of x-ray source 108 as seen in
An example of such a shield is illustrated in
Another challenge in upright breast CT is how to immobilize the breast. In some cases, for various reasons little or no compression of the breast may be desirable. In other cases, it may be desirable to compress or otherwise act on the breast, for example so that breast tissue can be pulled away from patient's chest wall and securely retained in unit 104 for imaging. To this end, and to generally increase patient comfort, at least one, and preferably both, of plates 104a and 104b have concave facing surfaces as seen in
Yet another challenge in upright breast CT is that the path lengths of x-rays through the breast may differ depending on the part of the breast they traverse. For example, the path lengths through breast portions at or near the nipple may be much shorter than those near the chest wall. When operating in the CT mode, the x-ray technician can shape the patient's breast as it is being immobilized in unit 104 using an x-ray transparent pillow or similar items to make the breast cross-section nearly uniform by pushing the nipple end toward the chest wall and securing the so-shaped breast in unit 104, to thus nearly equalize the x-ray path lengths through the breast. As an alternative that docs not involve so shaping the immobilized breast, a shaped x-ray filter can be used in the housing of x-ray tube 108 to shape the x-ray energy distribution of the imaging x-ray beam so that beam hardness increases in the direction from the nipple toward the chest wall. As yet another approach, x-ray path lengths can be equalized or at least made more uniform by a suitably shaped x-ray attenuating material arranged around the breast, in the path of the x-ray beam from the x-ray source.
Use of the system in a tomosynthesis mode is illustrated in
When operating in a tomosynthesis mode, the system of
In the tomosynthesis modes, a different patient shield can be used to protect the patient, and/or a different trajectory for tube 108 can be used, such as disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,245,694, hereby incorporated by reference. Such a patient shield is schematically illustrated as item 120 in
When operating in the mammography mode M, the system of
In some or all of the modes, the coronal cross-section of the breast immobilized in unit 104 can be approximately elliptical, as illustrated for breast 122 in
As illustrated in
The above specific examples and embodiments are illustrative, and many variations can be introduced on these examples and embodiments without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. For example, elements and/or features of different illustrative embodiments described above may be combined with each other and/or substituted for each other within the scope of this disclosure.
Thus, this patent specification describes a multi-mode x-ray system for imaging a breast of an upright patient comprising: a breast immobilization unit configured to immobilize a breast of an upright patient; an x-ray source on one side of a patient's breast immobilized in said unit and an x-ray imaging receptor on the other side of the breast, said source selectively emitting an imaging beam of x-rays and said receptor receiving said imaging beam, and said source and receptor being mounted for selective movement about the breast; an x-ray data acquisition unit coupled with said source and receptor and configured to selectively operate said system in a CT mode in which the source and receptor move about the immobilized breast of the upright patient through a CT angle of at least 180° and the receptor generates image data for a plurality of projection images CTp of the breast taken at different angles within said CT angle; an image processing unit configured to receive and computer-process at least some of said image data for said images CTp to thereby generate reconstructed images CTr representing slices of the breast having selected thicknesses and orientations, and to produce display slice images CTrd based thereon; and a display unit receiving said selectively displaying said display images CTrd for viewing.
The x-ray data acquisition unit can be further configured to selectively operate the system in a tomosynthesis mode T rather than in the CT mode, in which mode T the source traverses angular positions relative to the breast through a tomosynthesis angle T that is less than 180° and the receptor generates tomosynthesis projection images Tp of the breast taken at different angular positions of the source within said angle T; the image processing unit can be further configured to receive and computer-process at least some of the image data for images Tp to thereby generate reconstructed images Tr representing slices of the breast having selected thicknesses and orientations, and to produce display slice images Trd and display projection images Tpd based on the image data for the images Tp; the display unit can be further configured to selectively display said display images Tpd, Trd and CTrd; and the data acquisition and display units being further configured to select the CT mode or the tomosynthesis mode for operation.
The tomosynthesis mode can comprise a narrow-angle tomosynthesis mode Tn and a wide-angle tomosynthesis mode Tw, wherein: the x-ray data acquisition unit is further configured to selectively operate (i) in the mode T by causing at least the source to traverse angular positions relative to the breast through a relatively narrow angle and to cause the receptor to generate tomosynthesis projection images Tpn of the breast taken at different angular positions within the narrow angle, and (ii) in the mode Tw by causing at least the source to traverse angular positions relative to the breast through a relatively wide angle, wider than the narrow angle, and to cause the receptor to generate tomosynthesis projection images Tpw of the breast taken at different angular positions of the source within the angle Tw; the image processing unit is further configured to receive and computer-process at least some of the image data for images Tpn and Tpw to thereby generate reconstructed images Tr representing slices of the breast having selected thicknesses and orientations, and to produce display slice images Trd and display projection images Tpnd and/or Tpwd based on the image data for projection images Tpn and/or Tpw; the display unit is further configured to selectively display the display images Tpnd, Tpwd, Trd and CTrd; and the data acquisition and display units are further configured to select a mode of operation among the CT, Tn and Tw modes.
The x-ray data acquisition unit can be further configured to selectively operate the system in a mammography mode M, rather than in the CT mode or the tomosynthesis mode T, to thereby generate M image data for one or more projection mammograms Mp, each at a higher patient x-ray dose than a single one of the images Tp; the image processing unit can be further configured to receive and computer-process at least some of the image data for the one of more images Mp to thereby generate one or more display mammogram image Mpd; the display unit can be further configured to selectively display the display images Tpd, Trd, CTrd and Mpd; and the data acquisition and display units being further configured to select the CT, T or M mode of operation.
The data acquisition unit can be configured to vary the hardness of the imaging beam of x-rays with movement of the source relative to the breast at least in one of the CT and T modes of operation.
The breast immobilization unit can comprise an upper plate and a lower plate facing each other, wherein the facing portions of the plates are concave where engaging the breast for immobilizing the breast.
The display unit can be configured to concurrently display at least one of the images CTrd and at least one of the images Tpd and Trd in co-registration such that the selection of an anatomical feature in one of the concurrently displayed images automatically identifies a matching anatomical feature in at least another one of the concurrently displayed images.
The data acquisition unit includes a shield separating the patient from the moving source and x-ray receptor in each of said modes of operation while permitting the breast to remain immobilized between the platform and paddle.
In another preferred embodiment, an x-ray system for imaging a compressed breast of a patient with x-rays comprises: a breast immobilization unit configured to compress a patient's breast; an x-ray source on one side of the immobilization unit and an x-ray imaging receptor on the other side, mounted for movement about a breast compressed in said unit; an x-ray data acquisition unit coupled with the source and receptor and configured to operate the system in a CT mode in which the source and receptor move about the breast through an angle of at least 180°, and the x-ray receptor generates image data for a plurality of projection images CTp of the breast; an image processing unit configured to receive and computer-process at least some of the image data for the images CTp and computer-process the received data to generate reconstructed CT images CTr representing slices of the breast having selected thicknesses and orientations, and to produce display slice images CTrd based thereon; and a display unit receiving and selectively displaying the display images CTrd for viewing.
The immobilization unit can be configured to compress the breast of an upright patient.
The compressed breast can have a dimension in a first direction that is substantially less than in a second direction that is transverse to the first direction, and the data acquisition unit can be configured to vary the hardness of the imaging beam of x-rays with movement of the source relative to the breast so that the x-ray beam is harder when the x-rays are closer to the second direction than to the first direction.
The x-ray source can comprise an x-ray tube and the data acquisition system can be configured to vary the hardness of the imaging beam by varying a selected characteristic of electrical power driving the x-ray tube. The selected characteristic can be a voltage (kV) of the power driving the x-ray tube.
In yet another preferred embodiment, the disclosed invention can be an x-ray system for imaging a patient's breast comprising: an upper an a lower plates facing each other and configured to immobilize a patient's breast; each of said plates having a breast-engaging surface that is concave where engaging the compressed breast; an x-ray source on one side of said plates, and an x-ray imaging receptor on the other side, wherein at least said source is mounted for movement about the breast; a data acquisition unit coupled with the source and receptor and configured to cause the source to selectively generate an imaging x-ray beam at each of a plurality of angles of the source relative to the breast and to cause the receptor to generates image data for a plurality of projection x-ray images of the breast; an image processing unit configured to receive and computer-process at least some of the received data to generate display images of the breast; and a display unit receiving said selectively displaying said display images for viewing. In this system, the data acquisition unit can be further configured to cause the x-ray beam to have an x-ray hardness that varies depending on the angle of said beam relative to the breast.
Yet another embodiment is a multi-mode x-ray tomosynthesis system for imaging a patient's breast comprising: a breast immobilization unit configured to immobilize a patient's breast; an x-ray source on one side of the immobilization unit and an x-ray imaging receptor on the other side; at least the x-ray source being mounted for movement about the immobilized breast; an x-ray data acquisition unit coupled with the source and receptor and configured to operate the system selectively in (i) a pre-set narrow angle tomosynthesis mode Tn, and (ii) a pre-set wide angle tomosynthesis mode Tw, wherein (a) in the Tn mode at least the source traverses angular positions relative to the breast through a relatively narrow angle Tn and the receptor generates image data for tomosynthesis projection x-ray images Tpn of the breast within said angle Tn, and (b) in the Tw mode at least the source traverses angular positions relative to the breast through a relatively wide angle Tw and the receptor generates image data for a second plurality of tomosynthesis projection x-ray images Tpw of the breast within the angle Tw; an image processing unit configured to receive and computer-process at least some of the image data for the images Tpn and Tpw to selectively generate display images of (i) at least some of said images Tpn and Tpw and (ii) reconstructed tomosynthesis images Tr derived from image data for at least some of the images Tpn and Tpw and representing slices of the breast of selected thicknesses and orientations; and a display system selectively displaying sets of one or more of said display images for viewing; wherein the data acquisition and display units are further configured to select a Tn or Tw mode of operation.
Yet another embodiment is a multi-mode x-ray system for imaging a patient's breast comprising: a breast immobilization unit configured to immobilize a patient's breast; an x-ray source on one side of the immobilization unit and an x-ray imaging receptor on the other side, mounted for movement about the immobilized breast; an x-ray data acquisition unit coupled with the source and receptor and configured to operate said system selectively in (i) a narrow angle tomosynthesis mode Tn, (ii) a wide angle tomosynthesis mode Tw, (iii) a computerized tomography (CT) mode, and (iv) a mammography mode M, wherein: (a) in the Tn mode at least the source traverses a first plurality of angular positions relative to the breast through a relatively narrow angle and the receptor generates image data for a first plurality of tomosynthesis projection x-ray images Tpn of the breast, (b) in the Tw mode at least the source traverses a second plurality of angular positions relative to the breast through a relatively wide angle and the receptor generates image data for a second plurality of tomosynthesis projection x-ray images Tpw of the breast; and (c) in the CT mode, the source and the receptor rotate about a length of the breast through an angle greater than said wide angle, and the receptor generates image data for a third plurality of projection images CTp of the breast, wherein the images CTp are greater in number than the images in each of the pluralities of images Tpn and Tpw, and (d) in the M mode the source and the receptor generate one or more projection images Mp of the breast, using for each of said images Mp a patient x-ray dose greater than for any one of the images Tpn and Tpw; an image processing unit configured to receive at least some of said image data and computer-process the received data to generate display images of at least some of (i) said projection images Tpn and/or Tpw, (ii) reconstructed tomosynthesis images Tr derived from image data for at least some of said projection images Tpn and/or Tpw and representing slices of the breast having selected thicknesses and orientations, (iii) reconstructed CT images CTr representing slices of the breast having selected thicknesses and orientations, and (iv) one or more mammograms Mp representing projection images of the breast; and a display system selectively displaying sets of one or more of said display images for viewing.
Yet another embodiment is a multi-mode x-ray system for imaging a patient's breast comprising: a breast immobilization unit configured to immobilize a patient's breast; an x-ray source on one side of the immobilization unit and an x-ray imaging receptor on the other side, mounted for movement about the immobilized breast; a x-ray data acquisition unit coupled with said source and receptor and configured to operate said system to generate image data for projection images taken at different angles of at least the x-ray source relative to the breast; an image processing unit configured to receive at least some of said image data and to computer-process the received data to generate CT slice images of the breast representing slices of the breast having selected thicknesses and orientation and to further generate at least some of (i) tomosynthesis projection images Tp, and (ii) tomosynthesis slice images Tr reconstructed from at least some of the image data for said images Tp and representing slices of the breast having selected thicknesses and orientations; and a display system selectively displaying at least one or more of said CT images said Tp and Tr images for viewing.
Yet another embodiment is an x-ray system for imaging a breast of a patient comprising: an x-ray source and an x-ray imaging receptor mounted for movement about a position for a patient's breast such that an imaging x-ray beam impinges on the receptor after passing through the breast; an x-ray data acquisition unit coupled to the source and the receptor and configured to cause at least the source to move to different angular positions relative to the breast and emit an imaging x-ray beam at each angular position and to cause the receptor to generate image data for projection images taken at said angular positions; said data acquisition unit being further configured to cause the x-ray hardness of said imaging x-ray beam to vary with movement of the source from one of said angular positions to another, an image processing unit configured to receive at least some of said image data and computer-process the received data to generate display images of the breast derived from said projection images; and a display system receiving said selectively displaying said display images for viewing.
Yet another embodiment is a system for acquiring and displaying for concurrent viewing co-registered x-ray CT images and other x-ray images of a patient's breast comprising: a source of x-ray image data describing (i) CT slice images representing first slices of a patient's breast and (ii) non-CT x-ray images of the breast; an image processing unit configured to receive at least some of said image data and generate therefrom (i) display CT images of slices of the breast and (ii) non-CT display images of the breast; and a a display unit configured to display for concurrent viewing at least one of said display CT images and at least one of said non-CT display images; said display unit being further configured to cause said concurrently displayed images to be co-registered such that a mark placed by the system or user at an anatomical feature on one of the displayed images automatically appears at a matching anatomical feature of at least one other concurrently displayed image.
An embodiment of a method of breast imaging according to the disclosure above comprises: compressing a breast of an upright patient between a an upper plate and a lower plate; providing an x-ray source on one side of said plates and an x-ray imaging receptor on the other side; selectively imaging the patient's compressed breast with x-rays from the x-ray source received at the x-ray receptor after passage through the breast in: (a) a narrow angle tomosynthesis mode generating a plurality of tomosynthesis projection x-ray images Tpn of the compressed breast taken over a relatively narrow extent of respective different angles of the x-ray source relative to the breast, (b) a wide angle tomosynthesis mode generating a plurality of tomosynthesis projection images Tpw of the compressed breast taken at a relatively wider extent of respective different angles of the x-ray source relative to the breast, (c) a computerized tomography (CT) mode generating a plurality of CT images of the compressed breast taken while the x-ray source and the x-ray imaging move around the breast over an angle greater than said relatively wider extent, and (d) a mammography mode generating one or more projection images Mp of the compressed breast, each using a patient dose approximating that for a conventional mammogram; selectively moving the x-ray source and the x-ray imaging receptor in a direction generally along a length of the compressed breast from a position for one of said modes to a position for another of said modes; varying the x-ray source kV with the angle of the x-ray source relative to the breast while taking said images Tpw and/or said CT images; selectively computer-processing said images Tpn and Tpw to produce reconstructed tomosynthesis images Tr of selected slices of said breast; and displaying selected combinations of one or more of said Tpn, Tpw, Tr and CT images for concurrent viewing.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/719,852 filed Sep. 29, 2017 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,561,387), which in turn is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/330,533 filed Jul. 14, 2014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,808,214), which in turn is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/253,728, filed Oct. 5, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,787,522), claiming the benefit of U.S. Provisional No. 61/390,053 filed Oct. 5, 2010. The entire disclosure of each of these applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3502878 | Stewart et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3578971 | Lasky | May 1971 | A |
3863073 | Wagner | Jan 1975 | A |
3971950 | Evans et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3973126 | Redington et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4160906 | Daniels et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4259585 | Novak et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4310766 | Finkenzeller et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4496557 | Malen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4559641 | Caugant et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4599738 | Panetta et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4706269 | Reina et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4744099 | Huettenrauch et al. | May 1988 | A |
4773086 | Fujita et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4773087 | Plewes | Sep 1988 | A |
4819258 | Kleinman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4821727 | Levene et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4962515 | Kopans | Oct 1990 | A |
4969174 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4989227 | Tirelli et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5018176 | Romeas et al. | May 1991 | A |
RE33634 | Yanaki | Jul 1991 | E |
5029193 | Saffer | Jul 1991 | A |
5051904 | Griffith | Sep 1991 | A |
5078142 | Siczek et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5099503 | Strömmer | Mar 1992 | A |
5163075 | Lubinsky et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5164976 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5199056 | Darrah | Mar 1993 | A |
5240011 | Assa | Aug 1993 | A |
5289520 | Pellegrino et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5335257 | Stunberg | Aug 1994 | A |
5359637 | Webber | Oct 1994 | A |
5365562 | Toker | Nov 1994 | A |
5415169 | Siczek et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426685 | Pellegrino et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5452367 | Bick et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5506877 | Niklason et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526394 | Siczek et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539797 | Heidsieck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553111 | Moore et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5592562 | Rooks | Jan 1997 | A |
5594769 | Pellegrino et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596200 | Sharma et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598454 | Franetzki et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609152 | Pellegrino et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627869 | Andrew et al. | May 1997 | A |
5657362 | Giger et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668889 | Hara | Sep 1997 | A |
5706327 | Adamkowski et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719952 | Rooks | Feb 1998 | A |
5735264 | Siczek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769086 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5803912 | Siczek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818898 | Tsukamoto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828722 | Ploetz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5872828 | Niklason et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878104 | Ploetz | Mar 1999 | A |
5896437 | Ploetz | Apr 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005907 | Ploetz | Dec 1999 | A |
6022325 | Siczek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6075879 | Roehrig et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091841 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6137527 | Abdel-Malek et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141398 | He et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149301 | Kautzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175117 | Komardin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196715 | Nambu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216540 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219059 | Argiro | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233473 | Shepherd et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243441 | Zur | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256370 | Yavuz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272207 | Tang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289235 | Webber et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292530 | Yavus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327336 | Gingold et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341156 | Baetz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6375352 | Hewes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411836 | Patel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415015 | Nicolas et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6442288 | Haerer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459925 | Nields et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480565 | Ning | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501819 | Unger et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6556655 | Chichereau et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597762 | Ferrant et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611575 | Alyassin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620111 | Stephens et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626849 | Huitema et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633674 | Barnes et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638235 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645520 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647092 | Eberhard et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6744848 | Stanton et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748044 | Sabol et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751285 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758824 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813334 | Koppe et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6845146 | Rick et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6882700 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885724 | Li et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6912319 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6940943 | Claus et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6970531 | Eberhard et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978040 | Berestov | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6987831 | Ning | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999552 | Tsujii | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999554 | Mertelmeier | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7110490 | Eberhard et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110502 | Tsuji | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120283 | Thieret et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123684 | Jing et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127091 | Op De Beek et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142633 | Eberhard et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7218766 | Eberhard et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245692 | Lu et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245694 | Jing et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7315607 | Ramsauer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319735 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323692 | Rowlands et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7356113 | Wu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7430272 | Jing et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7443949 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7515682 | Li et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7583786 | Jing et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7609806 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616801 | Gkanatsios et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630533 | Ruth et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656994 | Eberhard et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7697660 | Ning | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702142 | Ren et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742796 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760924 | Ruth et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778388 | Sendai | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792245 | Hitzke et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7869563 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8005184 | Chen | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8787522 | Smith | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9020579 | Smith et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9668711 | Smith et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9808214 | Smith | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10098601 | Smith et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10357211 | Smith et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10561387 | Smith | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20010038681 | Stanton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012450 | Tsujii | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020050986 | Inoue et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075997 | Unger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020122533 | Marie et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030018272 | Treado et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030073895 | Nields et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095624 | Eberhard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030194049 | Claus et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194050 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194051 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194121 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210254 | Doan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215120 | Uppaluri et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040066884 | Hermann Claus et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066904 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094167 | Brady et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101095 | Jing et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109529 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040171986 | Tremaglio, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040267157 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050049521 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063509 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078797 | Danielsson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084060 | Seppi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084073 | Seppi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113681 | DeFreitas et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113715 | Schwindt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050135555 | Claus et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135664 | Kaufhold et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152590 | Thieret et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050226375 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060004278 | Giger et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030784 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074288 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098855 | Gkanatsios et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129062 | Nicoson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146982 | Kaipio et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155209 | Miller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060291618 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070030949 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036265 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076844 | Defreitas et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070133738 | Zimmermann | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070183564 | Li et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070223651 | Wagenaar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225600 | Weibrecht et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242797 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242800 | Jing et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263765 | Wu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080019581 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045833 | Defreitas et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080089471 | Kobayashi | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101536 | Sendai | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130979 | Ren et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080267484 | Chen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090003519 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010384 | Jing et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090080594 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080602 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090135995 | Eberhard et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135997 | Defreitas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154787 | Bertram et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090268865 | Ren et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296882 | Gkanatsios et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304147 | Jing et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100054400 | Ren et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100080343 | Kalender et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086188 | Ruth et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100150306 | Defreitas et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150417 | Kshirsagar | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100177866 | Shibuya | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195882 | Ren et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100195885 | Ma | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208037 | Sendai | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226475 | Smith et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120112088 | Abraham | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114095 | Smith et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120238870 | Smith et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130259193 | Packard et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150327826 | Smith et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20170086765 | Smith et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180035963 | Smith et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190290221 | Smith et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100362964 | Jan 2008 | CN |
103179906 | Apr 2016 | CN |
0 543 801 | May 1988 | EP |
0775467 | May 1997 | EP |
0982001 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1398721 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1428473 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1759637 | Mar 2007 | EP |
2366172 | Sep 2011 | EP |
2006-136741 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2012-157551 | Aug 2012 | JP |
WO 9005485 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9816903 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 0051484 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 03020114 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03073939 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004043535 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2005051197 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005071601 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005110230 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005112767 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006055830 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006058160 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2010061003 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2012048000 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2015054518 | Apr 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Feb. 5, 2020 official action in connection with European patent application No. 11 831 518.3. |
Kita et al., “Correspondence between different view breast X-rays using simulation of breast Deformation”, Proceedings 1998 IEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA, Jun. 23-25, 1998, pp. 700-707. |
Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis, GE Brochure 98-5493, Nov. 1998. |
Heang-Ping Chan et al., “ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions”, Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2005. |
Cole, Elodia, et al., “The Effects of Gray Scale Image Processing on Digital Mammography Interpretation Performance”, Academic Radiology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 585-595, May 2005. |
Federica Pediconi et al., “Color-coded automated signal intensity-curve for detection and characterization of breast lesions: Preliminary evaluation of a new software for MR-based breast imaging”, International Congress Series 1281 (2005) 1081-1086. |
“Essential for life: Senographe Essential Full-Field Digital Mammography system”, GE Health-care Brochure, MM-0132-05.06-EN-US, 2006. |
“Filtered Back Projection,” (NYGREN) published May 8, 2007; URL: http:--web.archive.org-web-19991010131715-http:--www.owlnet.rice.edu--elec539-Projects97-cult-node2.html. |
Smith, A., “Fundamentals of Breast Tomosynthesis”, White Paper, Hologic Inc., WP-00007, Jun. 2008. |
Aug. 12, 2009 International Search Report and Written Opinion in connection with PCT/US2009/055981. |
Apr. 23, 2010 International Search Report and Written Opinion in connection with PCT/US2010/026062. |
Extended European Search Report issued by the European Patent Office dated Mar. 16, 2017 in connection with European Application No. EP 11831518. |
Extended European Search Report issued by the European Patent Office dated Jun. 6, 2017 in connection with European Application No. EP 14852393. |
Wu Tao et al. (2003), “Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam images”, Medical Physics, AIP, Melville, NY, vol. 30, No. 3, p. 365-380. |
Wheeler, F.W. et al. (2006), “Micro-Calcification Detection in Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography”, Proceedings of SPIE, Conf-Physics of Semiconductor Devices—Dec. 11, 2001 to Deec. 15, 2001—Delhi, SPIE, US, vol. 614420-614421. |
Apr. 16, 2012 International Search Report and Written Opinion in connection with PCT/US2011/054926. |
Jan. 15, 2015 International Search Report and Written Opinion in connection with PCT/US2014/059939. |
“Lorad Selenia” Document B-B1-SEO US-Intl (May 2006), Hologic 2006. |
Apr. 15, 2019 official action in connection with Australian patent application No. 2014331830. |
May 16, 2019 official action in connection with European patent application No. 11831518.3. |
Nov. 4, 2019 official action in connection with Chinese patent application No. 201610218467.2. |
Aug. 1, 2018 official action in connection with Japanese patent application No. 2016-521343. |
Apr. 7, 2020 EPO action in connection with European patent application No. 14 852 939.9. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/415,675, Andrew P. Smith et al., System and Method for Dual Energy and/or Contrast Enhanced Breast Imaging for Screening Diagnosis and Biopsy, Patented (U.S. Pat. No. 9,020,579: also published as US 2012/0238870 A1). |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,090, Andrew P. Smith et al., Method for Dual Energy and/or Contrast Enhanced Breast Imaging for Screening, Diagnosis and Biopsy, Patented (U.S. Pat. No. 10,357,211: also published as US 2015/0327826 A1). |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/439,131, Andrew P. Smith et al., System and Method for Dual Energy and/or Contrast Enhanced Breast Imaging for Screening, Diagnosis and Biopsy, Pending (US 2019/0290221 A1). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200146644 A1 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61390053 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15719852 | Sep 2017 | US |
Child | 16720111 | US | |
Parent | 14330533 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 15719852 | US | |
Parent | 13253728 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 14330533 | US |