Urethral stent system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9622848
  • Patent Number
    9,622,848
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 23, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 18, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A urethral stent device comprising a mechanical valve system is provided. The urethral stent device can be delivered up through the urethra via a flexible delivery tool. The valve mechanism is adapted to open when exposed to a certain amount of intraluminal pressure and can remain open until a desired cessation of fluid flow is achieved.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to surgical methods and apparatus and, more specifically, to urethral stent systems and methods.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Pelvic health for men and women is a medical area of increasing importance, at least in part due to an aging population. Examples of common pelvic ailments include incontinence (e.g., fecal and urinary), pelvic tissue prolapse (e.g., female vaginal prolapse), and conditions of the pelvic floor.


Urinary incontinence can further be classified as including different types, such as stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence, among others. Other pelvic floor disorders include cystocele, rectocele, enterocele, and prolapse such as anal, uterine and vaginal vault prolapse. A cystocele is a hernia of the bladder, usually into the vagina and introitus. Pelvic disorders such as these can result from weakness or damage to normal pelvic support systems.


Urinary incontinence can be characterized by the loss or diminution in the ability to maintain the urethral sphincter closed as the bladder fills with urine. Male or female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) generally occurs when the patient is physically stressed.


In its severest forms, vaginal vault prolapse can result in the distension of the vaginal apex outside of the vagina. An enterocele is a vaginal hernia in which the peritoneal sac containing a portion of the small bowel extends into the rectovaginal space. Vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele represent challenging forms of pelvic disorders for surgeons. These procedures often involve lengthy surgical procedure times.


Urinary incontinence can be characterized by the loss or diminution in the ability to maintain the urethral sphincter closed as the bladder fills with urine. Male or female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurs when the patient is physically stressed.


Some patients can not receive other innovative or conventional sling or like incontinence procedures due to contraindications associated with general anesthesia, anticoagulant therapy, or other surgical solutions and approaches.


As such, there is a desire to obtain a minimally invasive yet highly effective system and method that can be used to treat urinary incontinence.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention describes pelvic incontinence stents adapted to treat various forms of incontinence in males and females. Embodiments of the present invention are generally directed for use in patients experiencing incontinence and contraindication for other surgical interventions or procedures.


A urethral stent device can include a mechanical valve system, to be delivered up through the urethra via a flexible delivery tool. Embodiments can include a passive valve system adapted to open when exposed to a certain amount of intraluminal pressure and will generally remain open until a desired cessation of fluid flow is achieved. Other embodiments of the valve mechanism or system can be actuated via an external mechanism or device (e.g., manual manipulation, electrical, magnetic, electro-mechanical, etc.).


The valve mechanism of the device can include a pivoting valve assembly having a valve flange, a stopper member and a pivot portion. The flange and stopper are operably connected to the pivot portion and can be generally rigid in certain embodiments. The pivot portion can include a biasing member, such as a spring device, adapted to bias the flange toward a first closed portion. Upon reaching a threshold fluid flow pressure on the flange, the flange moves in a first direction against the resistance of the biasing member. This biasing pressure can be set with the tension or bias of the biasing member according to normal sphincter or like muscle resistance or closure tendencies of a normal urinary lumen.


As fluid and pressure builds up along fluid flow path and against the flange, the bias of biasing member resists the flow and continues to promote continence. At a higher threshold flow level (e.g., buildup of urine within the bladder and along the urethra to the device) the flange begins to move until the flange rests against an interior wall portion of the valve mechanism. As the flange moves toward the wall portion, the stopper member correspondingly moves away from its seated position along the seat wall portion. Upon complete pivoting motion of the flange to the wall the stopper member is fully unseated from its original position such that a new fluid flow is permitted through the valve mechanism. Namely, urine flow is permitted to flow through the stent device to permit voiding.


An advantage of the present invention can be seen when a patient can not receive other innovative or conventional sling or like incontinence procedures due to contraindications associated with general anesthesia, anticoagulant therapy, or other surgical solutions and approaches.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a urethral stent device for use in treating incontinence in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 2-6 show various anatomical features and potential deployment sites for a urethral stent device for use in treating incontinence in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 7 shows a partial schematic sectional view of a urethral stent device in a closed position in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 8 shows a partial schematic sectional view of a urethral stent device in an open position in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 9 shows a delivery or introduction tool having a urethral stent device loaded therein in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring generally to FIGS. 1-9, various embodiments of an implantable stent implant device and system 5 is shown. In general, an implantable stent implant 10 can include a first body portion 12a, a second body portion 12b, and a valve mechanism 14. Various portions of the implant 10 can be constructed of polymer or compatible metal materials, such as polypropylene, polyethylene, fluoropolymers, Nitinol™ or other like materials. The implant device 10 can be constructed at least in part (e.g., portions 12a, 12b) of a biocompatible super alloy mesh tube adapted to provide expansion E along portions (e.g., portions 12a, 12b) of the device 10 due to shape memory properties. Namely, the portions 12a, 12b can self-expand to abut against an interior portion of the urethral wall upon deployment within the body lumen.


The various implants 10, systems, features, devices, introducer and deployment tools, and methods detailed or disclosed (e.g., for male and female) in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,500,945, 7,407,480, 7,351,197, 7,347,812, 7,303,525, 7,025,063, 6,926,732, 6,991,647, 6,691,711, t,471,718, 6,648,921, 6,612,977, 6,143,021, 5,499,994 and International Patent Publication Nos. WO 2008/057261 and WO 2007/097994, and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2010/0105979, 2002/151762 and 2002/147382 are envisioned for use, in whole or in part, with embodiments of the present invention; accordingly, the above-identified disclosures are fully incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Further, deployment tools and stent devices (e.g., stent expansion characteristics) provided with the UroLume devices and systems, made and sold by American Medical Systems of Minnetonka, Minn., can be employed with the present invention.



FIGS. 2-6 show potential anatomical sites for implantation of the stent device 10 of the present invention. However, the device 10 can be placed along various select portions of the urethral lumen, within male or female patients, to provide continence for the patient while still permitting voiding as disclosed herein.


Referring generally to FIGS. 7-8, the valve mechanism 14 of the device 10 can include a pivoting valve assembly having a valve flange 20, a stopper member 22 and a pivot portion 24. The flange 20 and stopper 22 are operably connected to the pivot portion 24 and can be generally rigid in certain embodiments. The pivot portion 24 can include a biasing member 26, such as a spring device, adapted to bias the flange toward a first closed portion as shown in FIG. 7. Upon reaching a threshold fluid flow pressure on the flange 20, the flange 20 moves in the direction of or with the flow A, e.g., against the resistance of the biasing member 26. This biasing pressure can be set with the tension or bias of the biasing member 26 according to normal sphincter or like muscle resistance or closure tendencies of a normal urinary lumen.


In general, two primary fluid flow paths are available. Namely, the device 10 is implanted within the urethral lumen of the patient, with the body portions 12a, 12b adapted to expand to securely abut the interior wall of the target urethra portion. Once installed, the valve mechanism 14 defaults in the closed position, as depicted in FIG. 7. The flange 20 is generally sealing against a top wall portion 23 and the stopper member 22 is seated against a seat wall portion 25. As such, urinary flow A or fluid pressure hits the flange 20 but is not sufficient to move the flange 20. As such fluid flow A is not permitted to exit out of the valve mechanism 14 to body portion 12a of the device. This is a state of continence for the patient.


As fluid and pressure builds up along fluid flow A and against the flange 20, the bias of biasing member 26 resists the flow and continues to promote continence. At a higher threshold flow level (e.g., buildup of urine within the bladder and/or along the urethra to the device 10, selective according to the spring or like biasing characteristics of the biasing member 26), the flange 20 begins to move with the flow A and toward the body portion 12a (e.g., at a break open force) until the flange 20 rests against interior wall portion 30 of the valve mechanism 14. As the flange 20 moves toward the wall portion 30, the stopper member 22 correspondingly moves away from its seated position along the seat wall portion 25. Upon complete pivoting motion of the flange 20 to the wall 30, as shown in FIG. 8, the stopper member 22 is unseated from its original position such that a new fluid flow B is permitted through the valve mechanism 14. Namely, urine flow is permitted to flow from the body portion 12b to the body portion 12b via fluid path B to permit voiding through the urethra U. The biasing member 26 or pivoting portion 24 can include a detent mechanism or like mechanisms to facilitate or control release of the spring tension or the break open condition during the pivoting conditions disclosed herein.


Upon completion, or substantial completion, of the voiding process along fluid path B, pressure of the fluid flow reduces to the point where the biasing characteristics of the biasing member 26 can urge the flange 20 back toward its original position, as shown in FIG. 7, to cause a reset of the mechanism 14. As such, the stopper member 25 again reseats at the wall portion 25 and fluid flow along path A is obtained to provide continence for the patient.


As described and depicted, the valve mechanism 14 can be passively actuated according to fluid flow. In other embodiments, the valve mechanism can be actuated (opening or closing—e.g., moving the flange 20 and/or member 22) by external means, including magnetic actuators, electrical actuators, mechanical actuators, electro-mechanical actuators, or other known external triggering sources, devices and techniques.


The valve housing can be a solid or semi-solid assembly. One or more bushings 34 can be included around a periphery or other portion of the valve mechanism 14 to generally reduce or eliminate expansion or movement of the mechanism 14 within the lumen of the urethra U.


As shown in FIG. 9, various adapted introducer tools 40 can be employed to introduce, deploy and manipulate the stent device 10. The tool 16 can include a distal end 42 adapted to selectively receive or secure the device 10 therein, a handle 44 having one or more actuation portions 46 (e.g., trigger or actuators), and a tubing or shaft portion 48. The tubing or shaft 48 can be generally flexible and in operable communication with the handle 44 and the device 10 to facilitate control and deployment of the device 10 within the urethra of the patient. In certain embodiments, the device 10 is pushed out of the shaft 48 at the distal end 42 once the distal end 42 is inserted and positioned at the target deployment site within the urethra U. While within the tool 40, the device 10 (e.g., portions 12a, 12b) are in a generally compressed configuration. Once deployed from the distal end 42, the device 10, or portions 12a, 12b thereof, automatically expand to provide secure abutment of the device 10 against the interior wall portions of the urethra U to promote continence.


All patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if individually incorporated, and include those references incorporated within the identified patents, patent applications and publications.


Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the teachings herein. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system for treating urinary incontinence in a patient, comprising: a stent-like device configured for deployment within a urethra, the stent-like device having;
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and second body portions is constructed of a self-expanding mesh material.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first and second body portions are constructed of a self-expanding mesh material.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the stopper member is provided in an initial seat position to seal off a urine flow path through the valve mechanism when urine flow is at least substantially blocked through the valve mechanism.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the stopper member is pivotable to an unseated position against the bias of the biasing member to permit urine flow along a flow path through the valve mechanism.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, further including an introducer tool having a catheter portion and a handle actuation portion.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the catheter portion includes a distal end portion adapted to receive the stent-like device.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the handle actuation portion is actuated to deploy the stent-like device from the distal end portion of the catheter portion.
  • 9. A system for treating urinary incontinence in a patient, comprising: a stent-like device configured for deployment within a urethra, the stent-like device having; first and second self-expanding body portions; anda single interior valve mechanism having a single pivoting flange member, a single pivoting stopper member, and a biasing member, the biasing member biasing the stopper member toward a closed position such that urine flow is at least substantially blocked through the valve mechanism to promote continence, wherein the pivoting stopper member defines an arm structure that extends generally perpendicular from the pivoting flange member such that the pivoting stopper member correspondingly rotates with the pivoting flange member such that the distance between the pivoting stopper member and the pivoting flange member remains substantially constant and does not decrease, wherein the biasing member is positioned at a pivot point around which the pivoting flange member and the pivoting stopper member pivot.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, further including an introducer tool having a catheter portion and an actuation portion.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the catheter portion includes a distal end portion adapted to receive the stent-like device.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the actuation portion is actuated to deploy the stent-like device from the distal end portion of the catheter portion.
  • 13. The system of claim 9, wherein the biasing member includes a spring member.
  • 14. A system for treating urinary incontinence in a patient, comprising: a stent-like device configured for deployment within a urethra, the stent-like device having; first and second self-expanding body portions; andan interior valve mechanism having a pivoting flange member, a pivoting stopper member, and a biasing member, the biasing member biasing the stopper member toward a closed position such that urine flow is at least substantially blocked through the valve mechanism to promote continence, wherein the pivoting stopper member defines an arm structure that extends generally perpendicular from the pivoting flange member such that the pivoting stopper member correspondingly rotates with the pivoting flange member such that the distance between the pivoting stopper member and the pivoting flange member remains substantially constant and does not decrease, wherein the biasing member is positioned at a pivot point around which the pivoting flange member and the pivoting stopper member pivot, wherein the stopper member is configured to be pivotable to a second position when a threshold urine flow pressure is exerted on the flange member such that the stopper member is pivoted to an unseated position to permit urine flow along a flow path through the valve mechanism.
PRIORITY

This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/445,699, filed Feb. 23, 2011 and entitled “Incontinence Stent System,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (137)
Number Name Date Kind
3124136 Usher Mar 1964 A
3182662 Shirodkar May 1965 A
3384073 Van Winkle, Jr. May 1968 A
3472232 Earl Oct 1969 A
3789828 Schulte Feb 1974 A
3924633 Cook et al. Dec 1975 A
4019499 Fitzgerald Apr 1977 A
4172458 Pereyra Oct 1979 A
4857041 Annis et al. Aug 1989 A
4865031 O'Keeffe Sep 1989 A
4920986 Biswas May 1990 A
4938760 Burton et al. Jul 1990 A
5007894 Enhorning Apr 1991 A
5012822 Schwarz May 1991 A
5013292 Lemay May 1991 A
5019032 Robertson May 1991 A
5036867 Biswas Aug 1991 A
5112344 Petros May 1992 A
5123428 Schwarz Jun 1992 A
5256133 Spitz Oct 1993 A
5269783 Sander Dec 1993 A
5328077 Lou Jul 1994 A
5366506 Davis Nov 1994 A
5386836 Biswas Feb 1995 A
5474518 Velaquez Dec 1995 A
5518504 Polyak May 1996 A
5582188 Benderev et al. Dec 1996 A
5591163 Thompson Jan 1997 A
5611515 Benderev et al. Mar 1997 A
5697931 Thompson Dec 1997 A
5782916 Pintauro et al. Jul 1998 A
5785640 Kresch et al. Jul 1998 A
5836314 Benderev et al. Nov 1998 A
5836315 Benderev et al. Nov 1998 A
5840011 Landgrebe et al. Nov 1998 A
5860425 Benderev et al. Jan 1999 A
6010447 Kardjian Jan 2000 A
6022312 Chaussy et al. Feb 2000 A
6027523 Schmieding Feb 2000 A
6030393 Corlew Feb 2000 A
6039686 Kovac Mar 2000 A
6042534 Gellman et al. Mar 2000 A
6042536 Tihon et al. Mar 2000 A
6048351 Gordon et al. Apr 2000 A
6050937 Benderev Apr 2000 A
6056688 Benderev et al. May 2000 A
6068591 Bruckner et al. May 2000 A
6074341 Anderson et al. Jun 2000 A
6077216 Benderev et al. Jun 2000 A
6110101 Tihon et al. Aug 2000 A
6117067 Gil-Vernet Sep 2000 A
6221005 Bruckner et al. Apr 2001 B1
6302840 Benderev Oct 2001 B1
6306079 Trabucco Oct 2001 B1
6328686 Kovac Dec 2001 B1
6334446 Beyar Jan 2002 B1
6352553 van de Burg et al. Mar 2002 B1
6382214 Raz et al. May 2002 B1
6387041 Harari et al. May 2002 B1
6406423 Scetbon Jun 2002 B1
6423080 Gellman et al. Jul 2002 B1
6451024 Thompson et al. Sep 2002 B1
6478727 Scetbon Nov 2002 B2
6502578 Raz et al. Jan 2003 B2
6575897 Ory Jun 2003 B1
6582443 Cabak et al. Jun 2003 B2
6592515 Thierfelder Jul 2003 B2
6592610 Beyar Jul 2003 B2
6596001 Stormby et al. Jul 2003 B2
6638210 Berger Oct 2003 B2
6638211 Suslian et al. Oct 2003 B2
6652450 Neisz et al. Nov 2003 B2
6673010 Skiba et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685629 Therin Feb 2004 B2
6689047 Gellman et al. Feb 2004 B2
6691711 Raz Feb 2004 B2
6699175 Miller Mar 2004 B2
6830052 Carter et al. Dec 2004 B2
6881184 Zappala Apr 2005 B2
6908425 Luscombe Jun 2005 B2
6911002 Fierro Jun 2005 B2
6932759 Kammerer Aug 2005 B2
6936052 Gellman et al. Aug 2005 B2
6960160 Browning Nov 2005 B2
7014607 Gellman Mar 2006 B2
7070556 Anderson Jul 2006 B2
7083568 Neisz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7083637 Tannhauser Aug 2006 B1
7112210 Ulmsten et al. Sep 2006 B2
7121997 Kammerer et al. Oct 2006 B2
7131944 Jaquetin Nov 2006 B2
7175591 Kaladelfos Feb 2007 B2
7226407 Kammerer Jun 2007 B2
7226408 Harari et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229453 Anderson Jun 2007 B2
7261723 Smith et al. Aug 2007 B2
7297102 Smith et al. Nov 2007 B2
7303525 Watschke et al. Dec 2007 B2
7407480 Staskin et al. Aug 2008 B2
7601118 Smith et al. Oct 2009 B2
7611454 De Leval Nov 2009 B2
7621864 Suslian et al. Nov 2009 B2
7686759 Sater Mar 2010 B2
7762942 Neisz et al. Jul 2010 B2
7789821 Browning Sep 2010 B2
7927342 rioux Apr 2011 B2
7981024 Levy Jul 2011 B2
20010049467 Lehe et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020128670 Ulmsten et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147382 Neisz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020151909 Gellman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030010929 Priewe et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030036676 Scetbon Feb 2003 A1
20030065402 Anderson et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030176875 Anderson Sep 2003 A1
20040015057 Rocheleau et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040073235 Lund Apr 2004 A1
20040225181 Chu et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050000523 Beraud Jan 2005 A1
20050004427 Cervigni Jan 2005 A1
20050055104 Arnal et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050131391 Chu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131393 Chu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050277806 Cristalli Dec 2005 A1
20060015010 Jaffe et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060058578 Browning Mar 2006 A1
20060195007 Anderson Aug 2006 A1
20060195011 Arnal Aug 2006 A1
20060217589 Wan et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229493 Weiser et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060229596 Weiser et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060252980 Arnal et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060287571 Gozzi Dec 2006 A1
20070032757 Medow Feb 2007 A1
20070078295 landgrebe Apr 2007 A1
20080140218 Staskin et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080300607 Meade et al. Dec 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (51)
Number Date Country
10211360 Sep 2003 DE
0248544 Dec 1987 EP
0470308 Feb 1992 EP
0650703 Jun 1994 EP
0643945 Jul 1994 EP
1093758 Apr 2001 EP
1342450 Sep 2003 EP
2787990 Jul 2000 FR
2268690 Jan 1994 GB
2353220 Oct 2000 GB
WO9319678 Oct 1993 WO
WO9819606 May 1998 WO
WO9835616 Aug 1998 WO
WO9835632 Aug 1998 WO
WO0018319 Apr 2000 WO
WO0027304 May 2000 WO
WO0066030 Nov 2000 WO
WO0074594 Dec 2000 WO
WO0074613 Dec 2000 WO
WO0126581 Apr 2001 WO
WO0139670 Jun 2001 WO
WO0145588 Jun 2001 WO
WO0145589 Jun 2001 WO
WO0228312 Apr 2002 WO
WO0228315 Apr 2002 WO
WO0230293 Apr 2002 WO
WO0232284 Apr 2002 WO
WO0238079 May 2002 WO
WO0239890 May 2002 WO
WO02058563 Aug 2002 WO
WO02062237 Aug 2002 WO
WO02069781 Sep 2002 WO
WO02089704 Nov 2002 WO
WO03047435 Jun 2003 WO
WO03075792 Sep 2003 WO
WO03092546 Nov 2003 WO
WO2004016196 Feb 2004 WO
WO2004017862 Mar 2004 WO
WO2005037132 Apr 2005 WO
WO2006015031 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006108145 Oct 2006 WO
WO2007014241 Feb 2007 WO
WO2007059199 May 2007 WO
WO2007097994 Aug 2007 WO
WO2007137226 Nov 2007 WO
WO2007149348 Dec 2007 WO
WO200714955542 Dec 2007 WO
WO2008057261 May 2008 WO
WO2008124056 Oct 2008 WO
WO2009005714 Jan 2009 WO
WO2011082350 Jul 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (22)
Entry
Bergman, et. al., “Three Surgical Procedures for Genuine Stress Incontinence: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Study,” Am. J. Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 173, No. 1, pp. 66-71.
Blaivas et. al., “Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment,” Gynecology and Obstetrics, pp. 473-476.
Conquy, Dophle, “Le point sur L'incontinence urinaire,” Expertise et practiques en urologie, No. 3, 1998.
DeLancey, John, “Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis,” Am. J. Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 170, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 1713-1723.
Gittes et al., “No-incision pubovaginal suspension for stress incontinence,” The J. of Urology, vol. 138 (1987), pp. 568-570.
Ingelman-Sundberg, “Surgical treatment of female urinary stress incontinence,” Contr. Gynec. Obstet., vol. 10 pp. 51-69 (1983).
Klutke et al., “The anatomy of stress incontinence: magnetic resonance imaging of the female bladder neck and urethra,” The J. or Urology, vol. 149, pp. 563-567 (1990).
Leach et al., “Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence,” Am. Urological Assc., vol. 158, 875-880 (1997).
Parra et al., “Experience with a simplified technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence,” British J. of Urology, vol. 68:615-617 (1990).
Petros et al., “Cough transmission ratio: an indicator of suburethral vaginal wall tension rather than urethral closure?”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69 Suppl. 153:43-51 (1990).
Petros et al., “Cure of stress incontinence by repair of external anal sphincter,” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69 Suppl. 153:75 (1990).
Petros et al., “Urethral pressure increase on effort originates from within the urethra, and continence from musculovaginal closure,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, 14:337-350 (1995).
Petros et al., “An integral theory of female urinary incontinence,” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69 Suppl. 153:7-31 (1990).
Petros et al., “An anatomical basis for success and failure of female incontinence surgery,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. Suppl. No. 153:55-61 (1993).
Seim et al., “A study of female urinary incontinence in general practice,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol 30;465-471 (1996).
Stamey, Thomas, “Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence in females,” Am. Surg. pp. 465-472 (1980).
Stanton et al., “Surgery of female incontinence,” ch. 7, pp. 105-115.
Ulmsten et al., “The unstable female urethra,” Am. J. Obstet & Gynecol. vol. 144, No. 1 (1982).
Ulmsten et al., “Different biochemical composition of connective tissue in continent and stress incontinent women,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 66:455-457 (1987).
Ulmsten et al., “Female urinary incontinence—a symptom, not a urodynamic disease. Some theoretical and practical aspect of the diagnosis a treatment of female urinary incontinence,” Int. Urogynecology J. 6:2-3 (1995).
Ulmsten et al., “An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence,” Int. Urogynecology J. 7:81-86 (1996).
Webster, George, “Female Urinary Incontinence,” Urologic Surgery, 3rd Ed., pp. 665-680 (1983).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120238803 A1 Sep 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61445699 Feb 2011 US