The present invention relates generally to surgical methods and apparatus and, more specifically, to urethral stent systems and methods.
Pelvic health for men and women is a medical area of increasing importance, at least in part due to an aging population. Examples of common pelvic ailments include incontinence (e.g., fecal and urinary), pelvic tissue prolapse (e.g., female vaginal prolapse), and conditions of the pelvic floor.
Urinary incontinence can further be classified as including different types, such as stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence, among others. Other pelvic floor disorders include cystocele, rectocele, enterocele, and prolapse such as anal, uterine and vaginal vault prolapse. A cystocele is a hernia of the bladder, usually into the vagina and introitus. Pelvic disorders such as these can result from weakness or damage to normal pelvic support systems.
Urinary incontinence can be characterized by the loss or diminution in the ability to maintain the urethral sphincter closed as the bladder fills with urine. Male or female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) generally occurs when the patient is physically stressed.
In its severest forms, vaginal vault prolapse can result in the distension of the vaginal apex outside of the vagina. An enterocele is a vaginal hernia in which the peritoneal sac containing a portion of the small bowel extends into the rectovaginal space. Vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele represent challenging forms of pelvic disorders for surgeons. These procedures often involve lengthy surgical procedure times.
Urinary incontinence can be characterized by the loss or diminution in the ability to maintain the urethral sphincter closed as the bladder fills with urine. Male or female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurs when the patient is physically stressed.
Some patients can not receive other innovative or conventional sling or like incontinence procedures due to contraindications associated with general anesthesia, anticoagulant therapy, or other surgical solutions and approaches.
As such, there is a desire to obtain a minimally invasive yet highly effective system and method that can be used to treat urinary incontinence.
The present invention describes pelvic incontinence stents adapted to treat various forms of incontinence in males and females. Embodiments of the present invention are generally directed for use in patients experiencing incontinence and contraindication for other surgical interventions or procedures.
A urethral stent device can include a mechanical valve system, to be delivered up through the urethra via a flexible delivery tool. Embodiments can include a passive valve system adapted to open when exposed to a certain amount of intraluminal pressure and will generally remain open until a desired cessation of fluid flow is achieved. Other embodiments of the valve mechanism or system can be actuated via an external mechanism or device (e.g., manual manipulation, electrical, magnetic, electro-mechanical, etc.).
The valve mechanism of the device can include a pivoting valve assembly having a valve flange, a stopper member and a pivot portion. The flange and stopper are operably connected to the pivot portion and can be generally rigid in certain embodiments. The pivot portion can include a biasing member, such as a spring device, adapted to bias the flange toward a first closed portion. Upon reaching a threshold fluid flow pressure on the flange, the flange moves in a first direction against the resistance of the biasing member. This biasing pressure can be set with the tension or bias of the biasing member according to normal sphincter or like muscle resistance or closure tendencies of a normal urinary lumen.
As fluid and pressure builds up along fluid flow path and against the flange, the bias of biasing member resists the flow and continues to promote continence. At a higher threshold flow level (e.g., buildup of urine within the bladder and along the urethra to the device) the flange begins to move until the flange rests against an interior wall portion of the valve mechanism. As the flange moves toward the wall portion, the stopper member correspondingly moves away from its seated position along the seat wall portion. Upon complete pivoting motion of the flange to the wall the stopper member is fully unseated from its original position such that a new fluid flow is permitted through the valve mechanism. Namely, urine flow is permitted to flow through the stent device to permit voiding.
An advantage of the present invention can be seen when a patient can not receive other innovative or conventional sling or like incontinence procedures due to contraindications associated with general anesthesia, anticoagulant therapy, or other surgical solutions and approaches.
Referring generally to
The various implants 10, systems, features, devices, introducer and deployment tools, and methods detailed or disclosed (e.g., for male and female) in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,500,945, 7,407,480, 7,351,197, 7,347,812, 7,303,525, 7,025,063, 6,926,732, 6,991,647, 6,691,711, t,471,718, 6,648,921, 6,612,977, 6,143,021, 5,499,994 and International Patent Publication Nos. WO 2008/057261 and WO 2007/097994, and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2010/0105979, 2002/151762 and 2002/147382 are envisioned for use, in whole or in part, with embodiments of the present invention; accordingly, the above-identified disclosures are fully incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Further, deployment tools and stent devices (e.g., stent expansion characteristics) provided with the UroLume devices and systems, made and sold by American Medical Systems of Minnetonka, Minn., can be employed with the present invention.
Referring generally to
In general, two primary fluid flow paths are available. Namely, the device 10 is implanted within the urethral lumen of the patient, with the body portions 12a, 12b adapted to expand to securely abut the interior wall of the target urethra portion. Once installed, the valve mechanism 14 defaults in the closed position, as depicted in
As fluid and pressure builds up along fluid flow A and against the flange 20, the bias of biasing member 26 resists the flow and continues to promote continence. At a higher threshold flow level (e.g., buildup of urine within the bladder and/or along the urethra to the device 10, selective according to the spring or like biasing characteristics of the biasing member 26), the flange 20 begins to move with the flow A and toward the body portion 12a (e.g., at a break open force) until the flange 20 rests against interior wall portion 30 of the valve mechanism 14. As the flange 20 moves toward the wall portion 30, the stopper member 22 correspondingly moves away from its seated position along the seat wall portion 25. Upon complete pivoting motion of the flange 20 to the wall 30, as shown in
Upon completion, or substantial completion, of the voiding process along fluid path B, pressure of the fluid flow reduces to the point where the biasing characteristics of the biasing member 26 can urge the flange 20 back toward its original position, as shown in
As described and depicted, the valve mechanism 14 can be passively actuated according to fluid flow. In other embodiments, the valve mechanism can be actuated (opening or closing—e.g., moving the flange 20 and/or member 22) by external means, including magnetic actuators, electrical actuators, mechanical actuators, electro-mechanical actuators, or other known external triggering sources, devices and techniques.
The valve housing can be a solid or semi-solid assembly. One or more bushings 34 can be included around a periphery or other portion of the valve mechanism 14 to generally reduce or eliminate expansion or movement of the mechanism 14 within the lumen of the urethra U.
As shown in
All patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if individually incorporated, and include those references incorporated within the identified patents, patent applications and publications.
Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the teachings herein. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/445,699, filed Feb. 23, 2011 and entitled “Incontinence Stent System,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3124136 | Usher | Mar 1964 | A |
3182662 | Shirodkar | May 1965 | A |
3384073 | Van Winkle, Jr. | May 1968 | A |
3472232 | Earl | Oct 1969 | A |
3789828 | Schulte | Feb 1974 | A |
3924633 | Cook et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4019499 | Fitzgerald | Apr 1977 | A |
4172458 | Pereyra | Oct 1979 | A |
4857041 | Annis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865031 | O'Keeffe | Sep 1989 | A |
4920986 | Biswas | May 1990 | A |
4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5007894 | Enhorning | Apr 1991 | A |
5012822 | Schwarz | May 1991 | A |
5013292 | Lemay | May 1991 | A |
5019032 | Robertson | May 1991 | A |
5036867 | Biswas | Aug 1991 | A |
5112344 | Petros | May 1992 | A |
5123428 | Schwarz | Jun 1992 | A |
5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
5366506 | Davis | Nov 1994 | A |
5386836 | Biswas | Feb 1995 | A |
5474518 | Velaquez | Dec 1995 | A |
5518504 | Polyak | May 1996 | A |
5582188 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
5611515 | Benderev et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5782916 | Pintauro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785640 | Kresch et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836315 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840011 | Landgrebe et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860425 | Benderev et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6010447 | Kardjian | Jan 2000 | A |
6022312 | Chaussy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027523 | Schmieding | Feb 2000 | A |
6030393 | Corlew | Feb 2000 | A |
6039686 | Kovac | Mar 2000 | A |
6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042536 | Tihon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050937 | Benderev | Apr 2000 | A |
6056688 | Benderev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068591 | Bruckner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074341 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077216 | Benderev et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110101 | Tihon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117067 | Gil-Vernet | Sep 2000 | A |
6221005 | Bruckner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6302840 | Benderev | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306079 | Trabucco | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328686 | Kovac | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334446 | Beyar | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352553 | van de Burg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6382214 | Raz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387041 | Harari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406423 | Scetbon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423080 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451024 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478727 | Scetbon | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6502578 | Raz et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6575897 | Ory | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582443 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592515 | Thierfelder | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592610 | Beyar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596001 | Stormby et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6638210 | Berger | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638211 | Suslian et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652450 | Neisz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673010 | Skiba et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685629 | Therin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689047 | Gellman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691711 | Raz | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699175 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6830052 | Carter et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881184 | Zappala | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908425 | Luscombe | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911002 | Fierro | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932759 | Kammerer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936052 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6960160 | Browning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7014607 | Gellman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7070556 | Anderson | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083568 | Neisz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083637 | Tannhauser | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7112210 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121997 | Kammerer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131944 | Jaquetin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7175591 | Kaladelfos | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7226407 | Kammerer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7226408 | Harari et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229453 | Anderson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261723 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303525 | Watschke et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7407480 | Staskin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7601118 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611454 | De Leval | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621864 | Suslian et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7686759 | Sater | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7762942 | Neisz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7789821 | Browning | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7927342 | rioux | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7981024 | Levy | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20010049467 | Lehe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020128670 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151909 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030010929 | Priewe et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036676 | Scetbon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065402 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030176875 | Anderson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015057 | Rocheleau et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073235 | Lund | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040225181 | Chu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050000523 | Beraud | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004427 | Cervigni | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055104 | Arnal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050131391 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131393 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050277806 | Cristalli | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015010 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058578 | Browning | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060195007 | Anderson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195011 | Arnal | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217589 | Wan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229493 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229596 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252980 | Arnal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287571 | Gozzi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032757 | Medow | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070078295 | landgrebe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080140218 | Staskin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080300607 | Meade et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10211360 | Sep 2003 | DE |
0248544 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0470308 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0650703 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0643945 | Jul 1994 | EP |
1093758 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1342450 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2787990 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2268690 | Jan 1994 | GB |
2353220 | Oct 2000 | GB |
WO9319678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO9819606 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9835616 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835632 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO0018319 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0027304 | May 2000 | WO |
WO0066030 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO0074594 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074613 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0126581 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0139670 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145588 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145589 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0228312 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0228315 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0230293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0232284 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0238079 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0239890 | May 2002 | WO |
WO02058563 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02062237 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02069781 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02089704 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO03047435 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO03075792 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03092546 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004017862 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2005037132 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2006015031 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2006108145 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2007014241 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007059199 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007097994 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007137226 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007149348 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO200714955542 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008057261 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008124056 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009005714 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2011082350 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bergman, et. al., “Three Surgical Procedures for Genuine Stress Incontinence: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Study,” Am. J. Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 173, No. 1, pp. 66-71. |
Blaivas et. al., “Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment,” Gynecology and Obstetrics, pp. 473-476. |
Conquy, Dophle, “Le point sur L'incontinence urinaire,” Expertise et practiques en urologie, No. 3, 1998. |
DeLancey, John, “Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis,” Am. J. Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 170, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 1713-1723. |
Gittes et al., “No-incision pubovaginal suspension for stress incontinence,” The J. of Urology, vol. 138 (1987), pp. 568-570. |
Ingelman-Sundberg, “Surgical treatment of female urinary stress incontinence,” Contr. Gynec. Obstet., vol. 10 pp. 51-69 (1983). |
Klutke et al., “The anatomy of stress incontinence: magnetic resonance imaging of the female bladder neck and urethra,” The J. or Urology, vol. 149, pp. 563-567 (1990). |
Leach et al., “Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence,” Am. Urological Assc., vol. 158, 875-880 (1997). |
Parra et al., “Experience with a simplified technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence,” British J. of Urology, vol. 68:615-617 (1990). |
Petros et al., “Cough transmission ratio: an indicator of suburethral vaginal wall tension rather than urethral closure?”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69 Suppl. 153:43-51 (1990). |
Petros et al., “Cure of stress incontinence by repair of external anal sphincter,” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69 Suppl. 153:75 (1990). |
Petros et al., “Urethral pressure increase on effort originates from within the urethra, and continence from musculovaginal closure,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, 14:337-350 (1995). |
Petros et al., “An integral theory of female urinary incontinence,” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69 Suppl. 153:7-31 (1990). |
Petros et al., “An anatomical basis for success and failure of female incontinence surgery,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. Suppl. No. 153:55-61 (1993). |
Seim et al., “A study of female urinary incontinence in general practice,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol 30;465-471 (1996). |
Stamey, Thomas, “Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence in females,” Am. Surg. pp. 465-472 (1980). |
Stanton et al., “Surgery of female incontinence,” ch. 7, pp. 105-115. |
Ulmsten et al., “The unstable female urethra,” Am. J. Obstet & Gynecol. vol. 144, No. 1 (1982). |
Ulmsten et al., “Different biochemical composition of connective tissue in continent and stress incontinent women,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 66:455-457 (1987). |
Ulmsten et al., “Female urinary incontinence—a symptom, not a urodynamic disease. Some theoretical and practical aspect of the diagnosis a treatment of female urinary incontinence,” Int. Urogynecology J. 6:2-3 (1995). |
Ulmsten et al., “An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence,” Int. Urogynecology J. 7:81-86 (1996). |
Webster, George, “Female Urinary Incontinence,” Urologic Surgery, 3rd Ed., pp. 665-680 (1983). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120238803 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61445699 | Feb 2011 | US |