Patent Application
20200022967
The present invention relates to a new use of specific 2-carboxamide cycloamino urea derivatives in the treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) (including EGFR1 also known as HER1 or Erb-B1; EGFR2 also known as HER2 or Erb-B2; EGFR3 also known as HER3 or Erb-B3; or EGFR4) dependent diseases or diseases that have acquired resistance to agents that target EGFR family members, use of said compounds for the manufacture of pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment of said diseases, combinations of said compounds with EGFR modulators for said use, methods of treating said diseases with said compounds, and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of said diseases comprising said compounds, alone or in combination, especially with an EGFR modulator.
Somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR has been associated with the clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor such as Gefitinib (Iressa®) or Erlotinib (Tarceva®) (Paez et al., 2004, EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy, Science, vol 304, 1497-1500). The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor family is composed of four subtypes, including is a member of the ERbB family of receptors including EGFR1 (also known as HER1 or Erb-B1); EGFR2 (also known as HER2 or Erb-B2); and EGFR3 (also known as HER3 or Erb-B3) and EGFR4 which are transmembrane proteins. Acquired resistance to EGFR modulators occurs in patients who initially responded clinically to therapy, but then developed progressive tumors. Refractory response to EGFR kinase inhibitors is exemplified with the secondary resistant mutation T790M (Kobayashi et al.; 2005; EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small cell lung cancer to gefitinib, N. Engl J Med, Vol 352, 786-792), which is comparable to the resistance mutation(s) observed for Gleevec/Glivec or Dasatinib in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) (Gorre et al.; 2002; Bcr-Abl point mutants isolated from patients with imatinib mesylate resistant chronic leukemia remain sensitive to inhibitors of the Bcr-Abl chaperone heat shock protein 90, Blood, vol 100, 3041-3044) or GIST patients (Antonescu et al.; 2005; Acquired resistance to Imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors occurs through secondary gene mutation, Clin Cancer Res, Vol 11, 4182-4190).
Evidences that activation of the PI3K pathway downstream of activated EGFR exists in the literature. Thus, genetic ablation of the PI3K catalytic subunit (p110) in mouse embryo fibroblast renders cells resistant for transformation by an activated form of EGFR (Zhao et al.; 2006; The p110 alpha isoform of PI3K is essential for proper growth factor signaling and oncogenic transformation, PNAS, vol 103, 16296-16300). HER3 (ErbB-3), one of the four member of the EGFR family and partner of HER1 (EGFR1) is often overexpressed in EGFR inhibitors sensitive tumors, and that is correlated with constitutive PI3K recruitment and activation (Engelman et al.; 2005; ErbB-3 mediates phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in gefitinib-sensitive non small cell lung cancer cell lines, PNAS vol 102, 3788-3793; Sergina et al.; 2007; Escape from HER-family tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy by the kinase-inactive HER 3; Nature; vol 445, 437-41). The genetic and biochemical characterization of tumor biopsies and tumor cell lines harboring EGFR amplification and EGFR inhibitor resistance have revealed a constitutive activation status of the PI3K pathway (Engelman et al.; 2006; Allelic dilution obscures detection of a biologically significant resistance mutation in EGFR amplified lung cancer, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol 116, 2695-2706).
Surprisingly, it has been found that specific 2-carboxamide cycloamino urea derivatives, which have been described in WO 2010/029082 provoke strong anti-proliferative activity and an in vivo antitumor response of breast and gastric cancer cell lines with amplified EGFRs and/or mutated EGFR1 as single agent and in combination with EGFR kinase modulators. Therefore, said compounds are useful for the treatment of EGFR dependent disease.
The present invention relates to the use of a compound of formula I (referred to herein as “Compound I”,
The present invention further relates to the use of the compound of Formula I, as defined above, or a salt thereof for the manufacture of a pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of an EGFR dependent disease or malignancy or a disease that has acquired resistance to an EGFR modulator.
The present invention further relates to the use of a compound of Formula I for the treatment of EGFR dependent diseases or malignancies or a disease that has acquired resistance to an EGFR modulator in combination with other active compounds, for instance, the combination partners as disclosed in WO 2010/029082. Most preferred are EGFR family targeting agents.
The present invention further relates to a combination comprising a compound of Formula I and an EGFR modulator selected from the group consisting of gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, NVP-AEE778, ARRY334543, BIRW2992, BMS690514, pelitinib, vandetanib, AV412, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody 806, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-Y90/Re-188, cetuximab, panitumumab, matuzumab, nimotuzumab, zalutumumab, pertuzumab, MDX-214, CDX110, IMC11F8, pertuzumab, trastuzumab, TDM1, Zemab®, the Her2 vaccine PX 1041, and the HSP90 inhibitors CNF1010, CNF2024, tanespimycinm alvespimycin, IPI504, SNX5422 and NVP-AUY922, wherein the active ingredients are present in each case in free form or in the form of a salt, and optionally at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, for simultaneous, separate, or sequential use for the treatment of EGFR dependent diseases, including for example non small cell lung carcinoma, head and neck cancer, colorectal carcinoma, breast cancer, brain malignancies, including glioblastoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, pancreas cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and/or ovarian cancer.
In another embodiment the present invention relates to a method of treating an EGFR dependent disease or a malignancy, preferably a malignancy, that has acquired resistance to EGFR kinase modulators during treatment with said EGFR modulator, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a specific 2-carboxamide cycloamino urea derivative of formula I, especially preferred (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) (Compound A) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, alone or in combination with an EGFR modulator, to a warm-blooded animal in need thereof.
In a further embodiment the present invention relates to a pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of an EGFR dependent disease or a disease that has acquired resistance during treatment with an EGFR modulator comprising a compound of formula I, especially preferred (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) (Compound A), or a salt thereof and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, alone or in combination with an EGFR modulator.
In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to the use of a compound of formula I, especially preferred (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) (Compound A), or a salt thereof for the treatment of an EGFR dependent disease or disease that has acquired resistance during treatment with an EGFR modulator.
For the in vivo testing in
For the in vivo testing of
For the in vivo testing in
The following general definitions shall apply in this specification, unless otherwise specified:
“Halogen” (or “halo”) denotes fluorine, bromine, chlorine or iodine, in particular fluorine, chlorine. Halogen-substituted groups and moieties, such as alkyl substituted by halogen (haloalkyl) can be mono-, poly- or per-halogenated.
“Hetero atoms” are atoms other than Carbon and Hydrogen, preferably nitrogen (N), oxygen (O) or sulfur (S), in particular nitrogen.
Carbon containing groups, moieties or molecules contain 1 to 7, preferably 1 to 6, more preferably 1 to 4, most preferably 1 or 2, carbon atoms. Any non-cyclic carbon containing group or moiety with more than 1 carbon atom is straight-chain or branched.
The prefix “lower” or “C1-C7” denotes a radical having up to and including a maximum of 7, especially up to and including a maximum of 4 carbon atoms, the radicals in question being either linear or branched with single or multiple branching.
“Alkyl” refers to a straight-chain or branched-chain alkyl group, preferably represents a straight-chain or branched-chain C1-12alkyl, particularly preferably represents a straight-chain or branched-chain C1-7alkyl; for example, methyl, ethyl, n- or iso-propyl, n-, iso-, sec- or tert-butyl, n-pentyl, n-hexyl, n-heptyl, n-octyl, n-nonyl, n-decyl, n-undecyl, n-dodecyl, with particular preference given to methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl and n-butyl and iso-butyl. Alkyl may be unsubstituted or substituted. Exemplary substituents include, but are not limited to deuterium, hydroxy, alkoxy, halo and amino. An example of a substituted alkyl is trifluoromethyl. Cycloalkyl may also be a substituent to alkyl. An example of such a case is the moiety (alkyl)-cyclopropyl or alkandiyl-cycloproyl, e.g. —CH2-cyclopropyl. C1-C7-alkyl is preferably alkyl with from and including 1 up to and including 7, preferably from and including 1 to and including 4, and is linear or branched; preferably, lower alkyl is butyl, such as n-butyl, sec-butyl, isobutyl, tert-butyl, propyl, such as n-propyl or isopropyl, ethyl or preferably methyl.
Each alkyl part of other groups like “alkoxy”, “alkoxyalkyl”, “alkoxycarbonyl”, “alkoxy-carbonylalkyl”, “alkylsulfonyl”, “alkylsulfoxyl”, “alkylamino”, “haloalkyl” shall have the same meaning as described in the above-mentioned definition of “alkyl”.
“Alkandiyl” refers to a straight-chain or branched-chain alkandiyl group bound by two different Carbon atoms to the moiety, it preferably represents a straight-chain or branched-chain C1-12 alkandiyl, particularly preferably represents a straight-chain or branched-chain C1-6 alkandiyl; for example, methandiyl (—CH2—), 1,2-ethanediyl (—CH2—CH2—), 1,1-ethanediyl ((—CH(CH3)—), 1,1-, 1,2-, 1,3-propanediyl and 1,1-, 1,2-, 1,3-, 1,4-butanediyl, with particular preference given to methandiyl, 1,1-ethanediyl, 1,2-ethanediyl, 1,3-propanediyl, 1,4-butanediyl.
“Alkendiyl” refers to a straight-chain or branched-chain alkendiyl group bound by two different Carbon atoms to the molecule, it preferably represents a straight-chain or branched-chain C2-6 alkandiyl; for example, —CH═CH—, —CH═C(CH3)—, —CH═CH—CH2—, —C(CH3)═CH—CH2—, —CH═C(CH3)—CH2—, —CH═CH—C(CH3)H—, —CH═CH—CH═CH—, —C(CH3)═CH—CH═CH—, —CH═C(CH3)—CH═CH—, with particular preference given to —CH═CH—CH2—, —CH═CH—CH═CH—. Alkendiyl may be substituted or unsubstituted
“Cycloalkyl” refers to a saturated or partially saturated, monocyclic, fused polycyclic, or Spiro polycyclic, carbocycle having from 3 to 12 ring atoms per carbocycle. Illustrative examples of cycloalkyl groups include the following moieties: cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclpentyl and cylclohexyl. Cycloalkyl may be unsubstituted or substituted; exemplary substituents are provided in the definition for alkyl and also include alkyl itself (e.g. methyl). A moiety like—(CH3)cyclopropyl is considered substituted cycloalkyl.
“Aryl” refers to an aromatic homocyclic ring system (i.e. only Carbon as ring forming atoms) with 6 or more carbon atoms; aryl is preferably an aromatic moiety with 6 to 14 ring carbon atoms, more preferably with 6 to 10 ring carbon atoms, such as phenyl or naphthyl, preferably phenyl. Aryl may be unsubstituted or substituted by one or more, preferably up to three, more preferably up to two substituents independently selected from the group consisting of unsubstituted or substituted heterocyclyl as described below, especially pyrrolidinyl, such as pyrrolidino, oxopyrrolidinyl, such as oxopyrrolidino, C1-C7-alkyl-pyrrolidinyl, 2,5-di-(C1-C7alkyl)pyrrolidinyl, such as 2,5-di-(C1-C7alkyl)-pyrrolidino, tetrahydrofuranyl, thiophenyl, C1-C7-alkylpyrazolidinyl, pyridinyl, C1-C7-alkylpiperidinyl, piperidino, piperidino substituted by amino or N-mono- or N,N-di-[lower alkyl, phenyl, C1-C7-alkanoyl and/or phenyl-lower alkyl)-amino, unsubstituted or N-lower alkyl substituted piperidinyl bound via a ring carbon atom, piperazino, lower alkylpiperazino, morpholino, thio-morpholino, S-oxo-thiomorpholino or S,S-dioxothiomorpholino; amino-C1-C7-alkyl, N—C1-C7-alkanoylamino-C1-C7-alkyl, N—C1-C7-alkanesulfonyl-amino-C1-C7-alkyl, carbamoyl-C1-C7-alkyl, [N-mono- or N,N-di-(C1-C7-alkyl)-carbamoyl]-C1-C7-alkyl, C1-C7-alkanesulfinyl-C1-C7-alkyl, C1-C7-alkanesulfonyl-C1-C7-alkyl, phenyl, naphthyl, mono- to tri-[C1-C7-alkyl, halo and/or cyano]-phenyl or mono- to tri-[C1-C7-alkyl, halo and/or cyan]-naphthyl; C3-C8-cycloalkyl, mono- to tri-[C1-C7-alkyl and/or hydroxy]-C3-C8-cycloalkyl; halo, hydroxy, lower alkoxy, lower-alkoxy-lower alkoxy, (lower-alkoxy)-lower alkoxy-lower alkoxy, halo-C1-C7-alkoxy, phenoxy, naphthyloxy, phenyl- or naphthyl-lower alkoxy; amino-C1-C7-alkoxy, lower-alkanoyloxy, benzoyloxy, naphthoyloxy, formyl (CHO), amino, N-mono- or N,N-di-(C1-C7-alkyl)-amino, C1-C7-alkanoylamino, C1-C7-alkanesulfonylamino, carboxy, lower alkoxy carbonyl, e.g.; phenyl- or naphthyl-lower alkoxycarbonyl, such as benzyloxycarbonyl; C1-C7-alkanoyl, such as acetyl, benzoyl, naphthoyl, carbamoyl, N-mono- or N,N-disubstituted carbamoyl, such as N-mono- or N,N-di-substituted carbamoyl wherein the substitutents are selected from lower alkyl, (lower-alkoxy)-lower alkyl and hydroxy-lower alkyl; amidino, guanidine, ureido, mercapto, lower alkylthio, phenyl- or naphthylthio, phenyl- or naphthyl-lower alkylthio, lower alkyl-phenylthio, lower alkyl-naphthylthio, halo-lower alkylmercapto, sulfo (—SO3H), lower alkanesulfonyl, phenyl- or naphthyl-sulfonyl, phenyl- or naphthyl-lower alkylsulfonyl, alkylphenylsulfonyl, halo-lower alkylsulfonyl, such as trifluoromethanesulfonyl; sulfonamido, benzosulfonamido, azido, azido-C1-C7-alkyl, especially azidomethyl, C1-C7-alkanesulfonyl, sulfamoyl, N-mono- or N,N-di-(C1-C7-alkyl)-sulfamoyl, morpholinosulfonyl, thiomorpholinosulfonyl, cyano and nitro; where each phenyl or naphthyl (also in phenoxy or naphthoxy) mentioned above as substituent or part of a substituent of substituted alkyl (or also of substituted aryl, heterocyclyl etc. mentioned herein) is itself unsubstituted or substituted by one or more, e.g. up to three, preferably 1 or 2, substituents independently selected from halo, halo-lower alkyl, such as trifluoromethyl, hydroxy, lower alkoxy, azido, amino, N-mono- or N,N-di-(lower alkyl and/or C1-C7-alkanoyl)-amino, nitro, carboxy, lower-alkoxy-carbonyl, carbamoyl, cyano and/or sulfamoyl.
“Heterocyclyl” refers to a heterocyclic radical that is unsaturated (=carrying the highest possible number of conjugated double bonds in the ring(s)), saturated or partially saturated and is preferably a monocyclic or in a broader aspect of the invention bicyclic, tricyclic or spirocyclic ring; and has 3 to 24, more preferably 4 to 16, most preferably 5 to 10 and most preferably 5 or 6 ring atoms; wherein one or more, preferably one to four, especially one or two ring atoms are a heteroatom (the remaining ring atoms therefore being carbon). The bonding ring (i.e. the ring connecting to the molecule) preferably has 4 to 12, especially 5 to 7 ring atoms. The term heterocyclyl also includes heteroaryl. The heterocyclic radical (heterocyclyl) may be unsubstituted or substituted by one or more, especially 1 to 3, substituents independently selected from the group consisting of the substituents defined above for substituted alkyl and/or from one or more of the following substituents: oxo (═O), thiocarbonyl (═S), imino (=NH), imino-lower alkyl. Further, heterocyclyl is especially a heterocyclyl radical selected from the group consisting of oxiranyl, azirinyl, aziridinyl, 1,2-oxathiolanyl, thienyl (=thiophenyl), furanyl, tetrahydrofuryl, pyranyl, thiopyranyl, thianthrenyl, isobenzofuranyl, benzofuranyl, chromenyl, 2H-pyrrolyl, pyrrolyl, pyrrolinyl, pyrrolidinyl, imidazolyl, imidazolidinyl, benzimidazolyl, pyrazolyl, pyrazinyl, pyrazolidinyl, thiazolyl, isothiazolyl, dithiazolyl, oxazolyl, isoxazolyl, pyridyl, pyrazinyl, pyrimidinyl, piperidinyl, piperazinyl, pyridazinyl, morpholinyl, thiomorpholinyl, (S-oxo or S,S-dioxo)-thiomorpholinyl, indolizinyl, azepanyl, diazepanyl, especially 1,4-diazepanyl, isoindolyl, 3H-indolyl, indolyl, benzimidazolyl, cumaryl, indazolyl, triazolyl, tetrazolyl, purinyl, 4H-quinolizinyl, isoquinolyl, quinolyl, tetrahydroquinolyl, tetrahydroisoquinolyl, decahydroquinolyl, octahydroisoquinolyl, benzofuranyl, dibenzofuranyl, benzothiophenyl, dibenzothiophenyl, phthalazinyl, naphthyridinyl, quinoxalyl, quinazolinyl, quinazolinyl, cinnolinyl, pteridinyl, carbazolyl, beta-carbolinyl, phenanthridinyl, acridinyl, perimidinyl, phenanthrolinyl, furazanyl, phenazinyl, phenothiazinyl, phenoxazinyl, chromenyl, isochromanyl, chromanyl, benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl and 2,3-dihydro-benzo[1,4]dioxin-6-yl, each of these radicals being unsubstituted or substituted by one or more, preferably up to three, substituents selected from those mentioned above for substituted aryl and/or from one or more of the following substituents: oxo (═O), thiocarbonyl (═S), imino(=NH), imino-lower alkyl.
“Arylalkyl” refers to an aryl group bound to the molecule via an alkyl group, such as a methyl or ethyl group, preferably phenethyl or benzyl, in particular benzyl. Similarly, cycloalkyl-alkyl and heterocyclyl-alkyl represents a cycloalkyl group bound to the molecule via an alkyl group or a heterocyclyl group bound to the molecule via an alkyl group. In each instance, aryl, heterocyclyl, cycloalkyl and alkyl may be substituted as defined above.
“Treatment” includes prophylactic (preventive) and therapeutic treatment as well as the delay of progression of a disease or disorder. The term “delay of progression” as used herein means administration of the combination to patients being in a pre-stage or in an early phase of the proliferative disease to be treated, in which patients for example a pre-form of the corresponding disease is diagnosed or which patients are in a condition, e.g. during a medical treatment or a condition resulting from an accident, under which it is likely that a corresponding disease will develop.
“Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor dependent diseases” or “EGFR dependent diseases” are especially such disorders or malignancy that respond in a beneficial way (e.g. amelioration of one or more symptoms, delay of the onset of a disease, up to temporary or complete cure from a disease) to the inhibition of a member of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor family (where among the diseases to be treated may include proliferative diseases such as cancers or tumor diseases). The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor family is composed of four members: EGFR1 (also known as HER1 or Erb-B1); EGFR2 (also known as HER2 or Erb-B2); EGFR3 (also known as HER3 or Erb-B3); and EGFR4.
“Pharmaceutical preparation” or “Pharmaceutical composition” refer to a mixture or solution containing at least one therapeutic compound to be administered to a mammal, e.g., a human in order to prevent, treat or control a particular disease or condition affecting the mammal.
“Pharmaceutically acceptable” refers to those compounds, materials, compositions and/or dosage forms, which are, within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for contact with the tissues of mammals, especially humans, without excessive toxicity, irritation, allergic response and other problem complications commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio.
“Salts” (which, what is meant by “or salts thereof” or “or a salt thereof”), can be present alone or in mixture with free compound of the formula (I) and are preferably pharmaceutically acceptable salts. Such salts are formed, for example, as acid addition salts, preferably with organic or inorganic acids, from compounds of formula (I) with a basic nitrogen atom, especially the pharmaceutically acceptable salts. Suitable inorganic acids are, for example, halogen acids, such as hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, or phosphoric acid. Suitable organic acids are, e.g., carboxylic acids or sulfonic acids, such as fumaric acid or methansulfonic acid. For isolation or purification purposes it is also possible to use pharmaceutically unacceptable salts, for example picrates or perchlorates. For therapeutic use, only pharmaceutically acceptable salts or free compounds are employed (where applicable in the form of pharmaceutical preparations), and these are therefore preferred. In view of the close relationship between the novel compounds in free form and those in the form of their salts, including those salts that can be used as intermediates, for example in the purification or identification of the novel compounds, any reference to the free compounds hereinbefore and hereinafter is to be understood as referring also to the corresponding salts, as appropriate and expedient. The salts of compounds of formula (I) are preferably pharmaceutically acceptable salts; suitable counter-ions forming pharmaceutically acceptable salts are known in the field.
“Combination” refers to either a fixed combination in one dosage unit form, or a non-fixed combination (or kit of parts) for the combined administration where a compound of the formula (I) and a combination partner (e.g. an other drug as explained below, also referred to as “therapeutic agent” or “co-agent”) may be administered independently at the same time or separately within time intervals, especially where these time intervals allow that the combination partners show a cooperative, e.g. synergistic effect. The term “combined administration” or the like as utilized herein are meant to encompass administration of the selected combination partner to a single subject in need thereof (e.g. a patient), and are intended to include treatment regimens in which the agents are not necessarily administered by the same route of administration or at the same time. The term “fixed combination” means that the active ingredients, e.g. a compound of formula (I) and a combination partner, are both administered to a patient simultaneously in the form of a single entity or dosage. The terms “non-fixed combination” or “kit of parts” mean that the active ingredients, e.g. a compound of formula (I) and a combination partner, are both administered to a patient as separate entities either simultaneously, concurrently or sequentially with no specific time limits, wherein such administration provides therapeutically effective levels of the two compounds in the body of the patient. The latter also applies to cocktail therapy, e.g. the administration of three or more active ingredients.
“Therapeutically effective” preferably relates to an amount that is therapeutically or in a broader sense also prophylactically effective against the progression of a proliferative disease.
The present invention relates to the use of specific 2-carboxamide cycloamino urea derivatives, alone or in combination, in the treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) family members (including EGFR1 also known as HER1 or Erb-B1; EGFR2 also known as HER2 or Erb-B2; EGFR3 also known as HER3 or Erb-B3; and EGFR4) dependent diseases.
Specific 2-carboxamide cycloamino urea derivatives which are suitable for the present invention, their preparation and suitable pharmaceutical formulations containing the same are described in WO 2010/029082 and include compounds of formula I
The radicals and symbols as used in the definition of a compound of formula I have the meanings as disclosed in WO 2010/029082 which publication is hereby incorporated into the present application by reference.
A preferred compound of the present invention is a compound which is specifically described in WO 2010/029082.
A very preferred compound of the present invention is (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) (COMPOUND A) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. The synthesis of (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) is for instance described in WO 2010/029082 as Example 15.
The ERbB family of receptors including EGFR1 (also known as HER1 or Erb-B1); EGFR2 (also known as HER2 or Erb-B2); and EGFR3 (also known as HER3 or Erb-B3) and EGFR4 are often overexpressed in cellular proliferative disorders or carcinomas. ErbB2 (HER2) is often overexpressed in breast, ovarian and gastric carcinomas. Although effective therapeutic approaches exist against ErbB2, 50% of patients with amplified/overexpressed HER2 do not respond to ErbB2 modulators such as trastuzumab. The breast cancer BT474 and HBCx-5 cell lines and gastric cancer NCI-N87 cell lines are useful models with ErbB2 amplification and highly tumorigenic in vivo. The antitumor activity of PI3K inhibitors such as the compounds of formula I is tested against both ErbB2 driven tumor models.
Surprisingly, administration of Compound A causes in vivo tumor grown inhibition in both models. In a panel of breast, CRC and pancreas cell lines containing or not containing ErbB2 amplification, Compound A decreases cell proliferation with a median GI50 of 139±82 nM in the BT474 breast cancer model and a median GI50 of 687±132 nM in the HCC1954 breast cancer model and induces cell death in both cell lines that overexpressed ErbB2.
In the orthotopically implanted BT474 breast cancer xenograft model in female athymic nude mice, Compound A produces a statistically significant antitumor effect in the Compound A group treated with doses of 12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg as compared to the vehicle treated group (p<0.05, ANOVA, post hoc Dunnet's). Compound A administered orally (p.o.) at 50 mg/kg once daily produces a mean tumor change of tumor volume of −29.7±15.6 mm3 (p<0.01, ANOVA and post-hoc Dunnett's) as compared to vehicle (mean tumor change of 315.1±16.4 mm3), with a 23.0% regression in the first experiment. (See
Compound A is well tolerated at 12.5 and 25 mg/kg as demonstrated by the non-statistically significant mean body weight change for the vehicle treated group (0.1±1.2%) and the Compound A treated group (1.4±1.2% and −1.2±1.2% respectively). However, the group treated with 50 mg/kg of Compound A shows a statistically significant mean change of body weight of 10.6±4.1% (p<0.05, using a paired t-test) and 8.2±2.6% (p<0.05, using a paired t-test) in the two experiments. (See
In the subcutaneous NCI-N87 gastric xenograft model in female athymic nude mice, Compound A produces a statistically significant antitumor effect in the Compound A treated group as compared to vehicle (p<0.05, ANOVA), with 11% regression in the experiment. (See
A compound of formula I, especially Compound A, is therefore useful for the treatment of such EGFR dependent diseases, especially malignancies, or EGFR family members acquired resistance driven diseases. Diseases or malignancies with an established or potential molecular link to dysregulation of EGFR activity are, for instance, described in “Mendelsohn and Baselga; Status of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antagonists in the Biology and Treatment of Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2787-2799”; “Mendelsohn and Baselga; Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeting in Cancer, Seminars in Oncology, Vol 33, 369-385”; Irmer et al., 2007, EGFR kinase domain mutations—functional impact and relevance for lung cancer therapy, Oncogene, 1-9; Roche-Lima et al., EGFR targeting of solid tumors; Cancer Control, 2007, Vol 14 (3), 295-304) which all are, including the references cited therein, hereby incorporated into the present application by reference.
According to the present invention the treatment of the following EGFR dependent diseases, especially malignancies, with compounds of formula I, especially Compound A, is preferred:
Further, the present invention relates to the use of a compound of formula I as described above or a salt thereof for the manufacture of a pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of an EGFR dependent disease or malignancy.
In one embodiment, the present invention relates to the use of a compound of formula I, especially (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) (Compound A) or a salt thereof for the manufacture of a pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of a EGFR dependent disease or malignancy or a disease that has acquired resistance to other compounds that target EGFR family members.
Compounds that target members of the EGFR family according to the present invention include EGFR family kinase modulators, compounds that alter EGFR expression levels or elicit a cellular immune response linked to the expression of EGFR family members in the tumor cells. As used herein, the term “EGFR modulator” shall mean a compound or drug that is a biological molecule or a small molecule that directly or indirectly modulates EGFR activity or the EGFR signal transduction pathway. Direct or indirect modulation includes activation or inhibition of EGFR activity or the EGFR signal transduction pathway. In one aspect, inhibition refers to inhibition of the binding of EGFR to an EGFR ligand such as, for example, EGF. In another aspect, inhibition refers to inhibition of the kinase activity of EGFR.
The resistance to the treatment with an EGFR modulator can be acquired during treatment with said EGFR modulator or can be due to a mutation or mutations in the protein.
Preferable EGFR modulators exhibit their activity as inhibitors of EGFR functional activity. Compounds that target members of the EGFR family according to the present invention include without limitation gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, NVP-AEE778, ARRY334543, BIRW2992, BMS690514, pelitinib, vandetanib, AV412, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody 806, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-Y90/Re-188, cetuximab, panitumumab, matuzumab, nimotuzumab, zalutumumab, pertuzumab, MDX-214, CDX110, IMC11F8, pertuzumab, trastuzumab, TDM1, Zemab®, the Her2 vaccine PX 1041, and the HSP90 inhibitors CNF1010, CNF2024, tanespimycinm alvespimycin, IPI504, SNX5422 and NVP-AUY922.
EGFR modulators include, for example, EGFR-specific ligands, small molecule EGFR inhibitors, and EGFR monoclonal antibodies. In one aspect, the EGFR modulator inhibits EGFR activity and/or inhibits the EGFR signal transduction pathway. In another aspect, the EGFR modulator is an EGFR monoclonal antibody that inhibits EGFR activity and/or inhibits the EGFR signal transduction pathway.
EGFR modulators include biological molecules or small molecules. Biological molecules include all lipids and polymers of monosaccharides, amino acids, and nucleotides having a molecular weight greater than 450. Thus, biological molecules include, for example, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides; oligopeptides, polypeptides, peptides, and proteins; and oligonucleotides and polynucleotides. Oligonucleotides and polynucleotides include, for example, DNA and RNA.
Biological molecules further include derivatives of any of the molecules described above. For example, derivatives of biological molecules include lipid and glycosylation derivatives of oligopeptides, polypeptides, peptides, and proteins.
Derivatives of biological molecules further include lipid derivatives of oligosaccharides and polysaccharides, e.g., lipopolysaccharides. Most typically, biological molecules are antibodies, or functional equivalents of antibodies. Functional equivalents of antibodies have binding characteristics comparable to those of antibodies, and inhibit the growth of cells that express EGFR. Such functional equivalents include, for example, chimerized, humanized, and single chain antibodies as well as fragments thereof.
Functional equivalents of antibodies also include polypeptides with amino acid sequences substantially the same as the amino acid sequence of the variable or hypervariable regions of the antibodies. An amino acid sequence that is substantially the same as another sequence, but that differs from the other sequence by means of one or more substitutions, additions, and/or deletions, is considered to be an equivalent sequence. Preferably, less than 50%, more preferably less than 25%, and still more preferably less than 10%, of the number of amino acid residues in a sequence are substituted for, added to, or deleted from the protein.
The functional equivalent of an antibody is preferably a chimerized or humanized antibody. A chimerized antibody comprises the variable region of a non-human antibody and the constant region of a human antibody. A humanized antibody comprises the hypervariable region (CDRs) of a non-human antibody. The variable region other than the hypervariable region, e.g., the framework variable region, and the constant region of a humanized antibody are those of a human antibody.
Suitable variable and hypervariable regions of non-human antibodies may be derived from antibodies produced by any non-human mammal in which monoclonal antibodies are made. Suitable examples of mammals other than humans include, for example, rabbits, rats, mice, horses, goats, or primates.
Functional equivalents further include fragments of antibodies that have binding characteristics that are the same as, or are comparable to, those of the whole antibody. Suitable fragments of the antibody include any fragment that comprises a sufficient portion of the hypervariable (i.e., complementarity determining) region to bind specifically, and with sufficient affinity, to EGFR tyrosine kinase to inhibit growth of cells that express such receptors.
Such fragments may, for example, contain one or both Fab fragments or the F(ab′).sub.2 fragment. Preferably, the antibody fragments contain all six complementarity determining regions of the whole antibody, although functional fragments containing fewer than all of such regions, such as three, four, or five CDRs, are also included.
In one aspect, the fragments are single chain antibodies, or Fv fragments. Single chain antibodies are polypeptides that comprise at least the variable region of the heavy chain of the antibody linked to the variable region of the light chain, with or without an interconnecting linker. Thus, Fv fragment comprises the entire antibody combining site. These chains may be produced in bacteria or in eukaryotic cells.
The antibodies and functional equivalents may be members of any class of immunoglobulins, such as IgG, IgM, IgA, IgD, or IgE, and the subclasses thereof.
In addition to the biological molecules discussed above, the EGFR modulators useful in the invention may also be small molecules. Any molecule that is not a biological molecule is considered herein to be a small molecule. Some examples of small molecules include organic compounds, organometallic compounds, salts of organic and organometallic compounds, saccharides, amino acids, and nucleotides. Small molecules further include molecules that would otherwise be considered biological molecules, except their molecular weight is not greater than 450 Da. Thus, small molecules may be lipids, oligosaccharides, oligopeptides, and oligonucleotides and their derivatives, having a molecular weight of 450 Da or less.
In particular, the present invention relates to the treatment of a disease or malignancy that is dependent on EGFR family members or has acquired resistance during treatment with an EGFR modulator, with compounds of formula I, especially Compound A or a salt thereof. Possible EGFR modulators that upon treatment can result in resistance are, for instance, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, cetuximab, nimotuzumab, panitumumab, trastuzumab; and TDM1.
In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to the use of a compound of the formula (I) for the treatment of EGFR dependent disease or malignancy or a disease that has acquired resistance to an EGFR modulator (“EGFR acquired resistance diseases”) in combination with other active compounds, for instance, the combination partners as disclosed in WO 2010/029082. More preferred combination partners for this aspect of the invention are EGFR family targeting agents such as, and without limitation to gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, NVP-AEE778, ARRY334543, BIRW2992, BMS690514, pelitinib, vandetanib, AV412, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody 806, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-Y90/Re-188, cetuximab, panitumumab, matuzumab, nimotuzumab, zalutumumab, pertuzumab, MDX-214, CDX110, IMC11F8, pertuzumab, trastuzumab, TDM1, Zemab®, the Her2 vaccine PX 1041, and the HSP90 inhibitors CNF1010, CNF2024, tanespimycinm alvespimycin, IPI504, SNX5422 and NVP-AUY922.
In a further embodiment, the present invention also relates to a combination comprising a compound of formula I, especially (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) (Compound A), and an EGFR modulator selected from the group consisting of gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, NVP-AEE778, ARRY334543, BIRW2992, BMS690514, pelitinib, vandetanib, AV412, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody 806, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-Y90/Re-188, cetuximab, panitumumab, matuzumab, nimotuzumab, zalutumumab, pertuzumab, MDX-214, CDX110, IMC11F8, pertuzumab, trastuzumab, TDM1, Zemab®, the Her2 vaccine PX 1041, and the HSP90 inhibitors CNF1010, CNF2024, tanespimycinm alvespimycin, IPI504, SNX5422 and NVP-AUY922, wherein the active ingredients are present in each case in free form or in the form of a salt, and optionally at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, for simultaneous, separate or sequential use for treatment of an EGFR dependent disease, including for example non small cell lung carcinoma, head and neck cancer, colorectal carcinoma, breast cancer, brain malignancies including glioblastoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, pancreas cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and/or ovarian cancer.
In particular, the present invention relates to a combination of compound of formula I selected from the group consisting of 2(S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) and an EGFR modulator selected from the group consisting of gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, cetuximab, nimotuzumab, panitumumab, trastuzumab and TDM1, wherein the active ingredients are present in each case in free form or in the form of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, and optionally at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier; for simultaneous, separate or sequential use for the treatment of non small cell lung carcinoma, head and neck cancer, colorectal carcinoma, breast cancer, brain malignancies including glioblastoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, pancreas cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and ovarian cancer.
In another embodiment the present invention relates to a method of treating an EGFR dependent disease or a malignancy, preferably a malignancy, that has acquired resistance to EGFR kinase modulators during treatment with said EGFR modulator, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a specific 2-carboxamide cycloamino urea derivative of formula I, especially preferred (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) (Compound A) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, alone or in combination with an EGFR modulator, to a warm-blooded animal in need thereof.
The diseases to be treated by this method are preferentially non small cell lung carcinoma, head and neck cancer, colorectal carcinoma, breast cancer, brain malignancies including glioblastoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, pancreas cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and ovarian cancer.
In a further embodiment the present invention relates to a pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of an EGFR dependent disease or a disease that has acquired resistance during treatment with an EGFR modulator comprising a compound of formula I, especially preferred (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) (Compound A), or a salt thereof and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, alone or in combination with an EGFR modulator.
The diseases to be treated by this pharmaceutical preparation are preferentially non small cell lung carcinoma, head and neck cancer, colorectal carcinoma, breast cancer, brain malignancies including glioblastoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, pancreas cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and ovarian cancer.
In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to the use of a compound of formula I, especially preferred (S)-Pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 2-amide 1-({4-methyl-5-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-pyridin-4-yl]-thiazol-2-yl}-amide) (Compound A), or a salt thereof for the treatment of an EGFR dependent disease or disease that has acquired resistance during treatment with an EGFR modulator.
The diseases to be treated by this compounds, alone or in combination with an EGFR modulator, are preferentially non small cell lung carcinoma, head and neck cancer, colorectal carcinoma, breast cancer, brain malignancies including glioblastoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, pancreas cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and ovarian cancer.
A compound of the formula (I) may also be used to advantage in combination with known therapeutic processes, for example, the administration of hormones or, especially, radiation. A compound of formula (I) may in particular be used as a radiosensitizer, especially for the treatment of tumors which exhibit poor sensitivity to radiotherapy.
Treatment in accordance with the invention may be symptomatic or prophylactic.
A compound of formula I can be administered alone or in combination with one or more other therapeutic compounds, possible combination therapy taking the form of fixed combinations or the administration of a compound of the invention and one or more other therapeutic compounds being staggered or given independently of one another, or the combined administration of fixed combinations and one or more other therapeutic compounds.
The dosage of the active ingredient depends upon a variety of factors including type, species, age, weight, sex and medical condition of the patient; the severity of the condition to be treated; the route of administration; the renal and hepatic function of the patient; and the particular compound employed. A physician, clinician or veterinarian of ordinary skill can readily determine and prescribe the effective amount of the drug required to prevent, counter or arrest the progress of the condition. Optimal precision in achieving concentration of drug within the range that yields efficacy requires a regimen based on the kinetics of the drug's availability to target sites. This involves a consideration of the distribution, equilibrium, and elimination of a drug.
The compounds of the invention may be administered by any conventional route, in particular parenterally, for example in the form of injectable solutions or suspensions, enterally, e.g. orally, for example in the form of tablets or capsules, topically, e.g. in the form of lotions, gels, ointments or creams, or in a nasal or a suppository form. Topical administration is e.g. to the skin. A further form of topical administration is to the eye. Pharmaceutical compositions comprising a compound of the invention in association with at least one pharmaceutical acceptable carrier or diluent may be manufactured in conventional manner by mixing with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent.
The pharmaceutical compositions are comprising an amount effective in the treatment of one of the above-mentioned disorders, of a compound of formula I or a salt thereof together with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers that are suitable for topical, enteral, for example oral or rectal, or parenteral administration and that may be inorganic or organic, solid or liquid. There are pharmaceutical compositions used for oral administration especially tablets or gelatin capsules that comprise the active ingredient together with diluents, for example lactose, dextrose, mannitol, and/or glycerol, and/or lubricants and/or polyethylene glycol. Tablets may also comprise binders, for example magnesium aluminum silicate, starches, such as corn, wheat or rice starch, gelatin, methylcellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose and/or polyvinylpyrrolidone, and, if desired, disintegrators, for example starches, agar, alginic acid or a salt thereof, such as sodium alginate, and/or effervescent mixtures, or adsorbents, dyes, flavorings and sweeteners. It is also possible to use the pharmacologically active compounds of the present invention in the form of parenterally administrable compositions or in the form of infusion solutions. The pharmaceutical compositions may be sterilized and/or may comprise excipients, for example preservatives, stabilizers, wetting compounds and/or emulsifiers, solubilisers, salts for regulating the osmotic pressure and/or buffers. The present pharmaceutical compositions, which may, if desired, comprise other pharmacologically active substances are prepared in a manner known per se, for example by means of conventional mixing, granulating, confectioning, dissolving or lyophilizing processes, and comprise approximately from 1% to 99%, especially from approximately 1% to approximately 20%, active ingredient(s).
The following Examples illustrate the invention described above; they are not, however, intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way. The beneficial effects of the pharmaceutical combination of the present invention can also be determined by other test models known as such to the person skilled in the pertinent art.
Experiments were performed in female HsdNpa:Athymic Nude-nu mice approximately 8-12 weeks of age at treatment start. All animals were housed under Optimized Hygienic conditions in Makrolon type III cages (max. 10 animals per cage) with free access to food and water.
BT-474 cells, which are human breast ductal carcinoma cells and ErbB2 amplified with a PIK3CA mutation K111N, were grown in DMEM culture medium containing 4.5 g/l glucose supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and incubated at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cell culture reagents were purchased from BioConcept (Allschwil, Switzerland).
BT-474 tumors were established in vivo by injection 3×106 cells in 30 μl HBSS (Sigma # H8264) containing 1 mg/ml Matrigel (BD #34234) orthotopically into the 3rd mammary gland on the right side of the animals. The efficacy experiments started when the tumors reached an average size of approximately 130 mm3 (day 14-16 post cell injection). The PK/PD experiment was performed when the tumors reached a size of 150-250 m m3 (day 22 after cell injection). On the day of cell injection, a 0.025 17β Estradiol pellent has been implanted subcutaneously on the left flank into each experimental animal under Forene® inhalation narcosis.
Compound A was formulated in NMP/PEG300/Solutol HS15/water (10:30:20:40% vol/vol). The Compound was fully dissolved in NMP. Then, PEG300 and liquified Solutol were added (in sequence with vortexing after addition of each reagent). Water was added immediately prior to administration to the animals. Compound A or vehicle was administered orally at a volume of 10 ml/kg.
Tumor volumes were measured with calipers and determined according to the formula: length×diameter2×π/6. Antitumor activity is expressed as T/C % (mean change of tumor volume of treated animals/mean change of tumor volume of control animals)×100. Regressions (%) were calculated according to the formula ((mean tumor volume at end of treatment-mean tumor volume at start of treatment)/mean tumor volume at start of treatment)×100. Body weights and tumor volumes were recorded twice a week.
Where applicable, data is presented as mean±SEM. For all tests, the level of significance was set at p<0.05. For tumor volumes, comparisons between treatment groups and vehicle control group were done using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test. The level of significance of body weight change within a group between the start and the end of the treatment period was determined using a paired t-test. Comparisons of delta body weights between treatment and vehicle control groups were performed by a one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Dunnett's test.
In the first experiment, Compound A was orally administered daily to BT-474 orthotopic xenografts, tumor-bearing nude mice at a dose of 50 mg/kg. Vehicle controls consisted of animals receiving daily an oral administration of 10 ml/kg of a mixture of NMP/PEG300/Solutol HS15/water (10:30:20:40% vol/vol). Compound A administered orally at 50 mg/kg once daily produces a mean tumor change of tumor volume of −29.7±15.6 mm3 (p<0.01, ANOVA and post-hoc Dunnett's) as compared to vehicle (mean tumor change of 315.1±16.4 mm3), with a 23.0% regression in the first experiment.
In a second experiment, Compound A was orally administered daily to BT-474 orthotopic xenografts, tumor-bearing nude mice at doses of 12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg. Vehicle controls consisted of animals receiving daily an oral administration of 10 ml/kg of a mixture of NMP/PEG300/Solutol HS15/water (10:30:20:40% vol/vol). Compound A produces a statistically significant antitumor effect in the Compound A group treated with doses of 12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg as compared to the vehicle treated group (p<0.05, ANOVA, post hoc Dunnet's). (See
Compound A was well tolerated at 12.5 and 25 mg/kg as demonstrated by the non-statistically significant mean body weight change for the vehicle treated group (0.1±1.2%) and the Compound A treated group (1.4±1.2% and −1.2±1.2% respectively). However, the group treated with 50 mg/kg of Compound A showed a statistically significant mean change of body weight of 10.6±4.1% (p<0.05, using a paired t-test) and 8.2±2.6% (p<0.05, using a paired t-test) in the two experiments. (See
Experiments were performed in female HsdNpa:Athymic Nude-nu mice approximately 8-12 weeks of age at treatment start. All animals were housed under Optimized Hygienic conditions in Makrolon type III cages (max. 10 animals per cage) with free access to food and water.
NCI-N87 cells (obtained from the American Type Culture Collection), which are of gastric origin and ErbB2 amplified, were grown in DMEM culture medium containing 4.5 g/l glucose supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. The cells were incubated at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cells were harvested with trypsin (0.25% w/v)-EDTA (0.53 mM), re-suspended in culture medium (with additives) and counted with a Casy® system. Cell culture reagents were purchased from BioConcept (Allschwil, Switzerland).
NCI-N87 tumors were established from fragments of approximately 40 mg implanted subcutaneously into the female HsdNpa:Athymic Nude-nu mice with a trocar needle. Treatment started when the tumors reached a size of approximately 110 mm3, 25 days post implantation.
Compound A was formulated in NMP/PEG300/Solutol HS15/water (10:30:20:40% vol/vol). The Compound was fully dissolved in NMP. Then, PEG300 and liquified Solutol were added (in sequence with vortexing after addition of each reagent). Water was added immediately prior to administration to the animals.
Tumor volumes were measured with calipers and determined according to the formula: length×diameter2×π/6. Antitumor activity is expressed as T/C % (mean change of tumor volume of treated animals/mean change of tumor volume of control animals)×100. Regressions (%) were calculated according to the formula ((mean tumor volume at end of treatment-mean tumor volume at start of treatment)/mean tumor volume at start of treatment)×100. Body weights and tumor volumes were recorded twice a week.
Where applicable, data is presented as mean±SEM. For all tests, the level of significance was set at p<0.05. For tumor volumes, comparisons between treatment groups and vehicle control group were done using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test. The level of significance of body weight change within a group between the start and the end of the treatment period was determined using a paired t-test. Comparisons of delta body weights between treatment and vehicle control groups were performed by a one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Dunnett's test.
Compound A was orally administered daily to NCI-N87 tumor bearing animals at a dose of 50 mg/kg. Treatments started 18 days post tumor cell implantation and lasted for 20 consecutive days. Vehicle controls consisted of animals receiving a daily oral administration of a mixture of NMP/PEG300/Solutol HS15/water (10:30:20:40% vol/vol). Compound A produced a statistically significant antitumor effect (p<0.05, ANOVA) with 11% regressions. Compound A produced a mean change of tumor volume of −11.8±17.2 mm3 (p<0.01, ANOVA and post-hoc Dunnett's) as compared to vehicle (mean change of tumor volume of 694.0±93.5 mm3. Compound A was well tolerated as demonstrated by the non-statistically significant mean change of body weight for the group treated with 50 mg/kg of Compound A (3.8±2.1%) in the experiment. (See
Experiments were performed in female HsdNpa:Athymic Nude-nu mice approximately 8-12 weeks of age at treatment start. All animals were housed under Optimized Hygienic conditions in Makrolon type III cages (max. 10 animals per cage) with free access to food and water.
BT-474 cells, which are human breast ductal carcinoma cells and ErbB2 amplified with a PIK3CA mutation K111N, were grown in DMEM culture medium containing 4.5 g/l glucose supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and incubated at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cell culture reagents were purchased from BioConcept (Allschwil, Switzerland).
BT-474 tumors were established in vivo by injection 3×106 cells in 30p1 HBSS (Sigma # H8264) containing 1 mg/ml Matrigel (BD #34234) orthotopically into the 3rd mammary gland on the right side of the animals. The efficacy experiments started when the tumors reached an average size of approximately 130 mm3 (day 14 post cell injection). On the day of cell injection, a 0.025 17β Estradiol pellent has been implanted subcutaneously on the left flank into each experimental animal under Forene® inhalation narcosis.
Compound A was formulated in NMP/PEG300/Solutol HS15/water (10:30:20:40% vol/vol). The Compound was fully dissolved in NMP. Then, PEG300 and liquified Solutol were added (in sequence with vortexing after addition of each reagent). Water was added immediately prior to administration to the animals. Compound A or vehicle was administered orally at a volume of 10 ml/kg. Trastuzumab was reconstituted in PBS and administered intraperitoneally three times per week at a concentration of 3 mg/kg.
Tumor volumes were measured with calipers and determined according to the formula: length×diameter2×π/6. Antitumor activity is expressed as T/C % (mean change of tumor volume of treated animals/mean change of tumor volume of control animals)×100. Regressions (%) were calculated according to the formula ((mean tumor volume at end of treatment-mean tumor volume at start of treatment)/mean tumor volume at start of treatment)×100. Body weights and tumor volumes were recorded twice a week.
Where applicable, data is presented as mean±SEM. For all tests, the level of significance was set at p<0.05. For tumor volumes, comparisons between treatment groups and vehicle control group were done using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test. The level of significance of body weight change within a group between the start and the end of the treatment period was determined using a paired t-test. Comparisons of delta body weights between treatment and vehicle control groups were performed by a one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Dunnett's test.
In addition, an approximation of drug interactions was made using the method described in Clarke R., Breast Cancer Res. Treat (1997) 46:255-278. This was applied to change in tumor volumes and known to be useful for estimating interactions from limited data. According to the method described by Clarke: For compound A, B or the combination AB (with control group C), antagonism is predicted when the calculation AB/C>A/C×B/C, additive effect when AB/C=A/C×B/C, and synergistic when A×B/C<A/C×B/C.
Compound A was administered orally daily as a single agent to BT-474 tumor bearing animals at a dose of 12.5 mg/kg. Trastuzumab as a single agent was administered as intraperitoneal injections of 3 mg/kg, three times per week. Compound A produced a statistically significant antitumor effect (p<0.05, ANOVA), with a T/C of 21.5%. Trastuzumab also produced a statistically significant antitumor effect (p<0.05, ANOVA), with a T/C of 35.8%. Analysis of the combination interactions with the method described by Clarke R., Breast Cancer Res. Treat (1997) 46:255-278, indicated a synergistic antitumor effect of the combination at 12.5 mg daily and 3 mg/kg three times per week as compared to the single agent. (See
However, this combination was only statistically different from Compound A as single agent (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) and not from trastuzumab as single agent. Treatments were well tolerated since no significant body weight loss was observed.
Compound A was administered orally daily as a single agent to BT-474 tumor bearing animals at a dose of 50 mg/kg. Trastuzumab as a single agent was administered as intraperitoneal injections of 10 mg/kg, three times per week. Compound A produced a statistically significant antitumor effect (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test). Trastuzumab also produced a statistically significant antitumor effect (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test.). Analysis of the combination interactions with the method described by Clarke R., Breast Cancer Res. Treat (1997) 46:255-278, indicated a synergistic antitumor effect of the combination at 50 mg daily of Compound A and 10 mg/kg three times per week of trastuzumab as compared to the single agent. (See
A significant body weight loss was observed with Compound A as single agent or in combination with trastuzumab (about 12% and about 10%, respectively).
Experiments were performed in female CB17 SCID mice (Fox Chase SCID®, CB17/lcr-Prkdcscid, Charles River) approximately 7-8 weeks of age and having a body weight (BW) range of 14.7-21.2 g at treatment start. All animals were fed ad libitum water (reverse osmosis, 1 ppm CI) and NIH 31 Modified and Irradiated Lab Diet® consisting of 18.0% crude protein, 5.0% crude fat, and 5.0% crude fiber. The mice were housed on irradiated Enrich-O'cobs™ Laboratory Animal Bedding in static microisolators on a 12-hour light cycle at 21-22° C. and 40-60% humidity.
NCI-N87 cells (obtained from the American Type Culture Collection), which are of gastric origin and ErbB2 amplified, were maintained as exponentially growing cultures in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/mL penicillin G sodium, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin sulfate. The tumor cells were cultured in tissue culture flasks in a humid incubator at 37° C., in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. Cells were harvested with 1× trypsin and suspended at a concentration of 5×107 cells/mL in cold phosphate-buffered saline with 50% Matrigel. Each mouse was injected subcutaneously in the right flank with 1×107 cells (0.2 mL cell suspension). Tumor volumes were measured with calipers and determined according to the formula: width2×length/2, and tumor weight estimated with the assumption that 1 mg is equivalent to 1 mm3 of tumor volume. Nine days after tumor implantation (on Day 1 of the study), mice with individual tumor volumes of 126-320 mm3 were sorted into 12 groups of eight mice with a group mean tumor volume of 231-239 mm3.
Compound A was formulated in NMP/PEG300/Solutol HS15/deionized water (10:30:20:40% vol/vol). The Compound was fully dissolved in NMP. Then, PEG300 and liquified Solutol were added (in sequence with vortexing after addition of each reagent). Water was added prior to administration to the animals. Fresh dosing solutions were prepared weekly and stored at 4° C., protected from light.
Trastuzumab (Herceptin®, Genentech, 21 mg/mL) was freshly diluted with saline (Vehicle 2) on each day of dosing.
Treatments started 9 days post tumor cell implantation and lasted for 30 consecutive days (or until tumor volume=2000 mm3). Compound A was orally administered once daily to NCI-N87 tumor bearing animals, and trastuzumab was administered by intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) twice weekly for four weeks. Controls (Group 1) consisted of animals receiving a mixture of NMP/PEG300/Solutol HS15/water (10:30:20:40% vol/vol) (Vehicle 1) per oral (p.o.) once daily and saline (Vehicle 2) by intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) twice weekly for four weeks. For combination therapies, trastuzumab was dosed within 30 minutes after Compound A. Dosing volume (10 mL/kg, was scaled to the weight of each animal as determined on day of dosing, except on weekends when the previous BW was carried forward. Groups 2-4 received monotherapies with 12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg Compound A, respectively. Groups 5 and 6 received monotherapeis with 3 and 10 mg/kg trastuzumab, respectively. Groups 7-9 received 12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg Compound A, respectively, each in combination with 3 mg/kg trastuzumab. Groups 10-12 received 12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg Compound A, respectively, each in combination with 10 mg/kg trastuzumab. Groups 4, 9 and 12 were stopped early. Body weights were recorded on Days 1-5, on each treatment day (except weekends), and twice weekly thereafter until end of the study.
Antitumor activity is expressed as T/C % (mean change of tumor volume of treated animals/mean change of tumor volume of control animals)×100. A treatment that achieves a T/C value of 40% or less would be classified as potentially therapeutically active. Treatment efficacy may also be determined from the number of regression responses: (a) a partial regression (PR) indicates that the tumor was 50% or less of its starting Day 1 volume for three consecutive measurements in the study and equal to or greater than 13.5 mm3 for one or more of these three measurements, and (b) a complete regression (CR) indicates that the tumor volume was less than 13.5 mm3 for three consecutive measurements during the study.
Where applicable, data is presented as mean±SEM. Statisticial and graphical analyses was performed with Prism 3.03 (GraphPad) for Windows. For all tests, the level of significance of differences was done using ANOVA, with Bartlett's test; and a post-hoc Dunnett's multiple comparison test compared the mean change for each drub-treated group to the mean for Group 1. When Bartlett's test for equal variance showed significant differences (P=0.0401), groups were compared with the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, which showed significant differences among the median volume changes (P<0.0001). The significance of differences between the median volume changes for drug-treated groups and Group 1 was analyzed post hoc with Dunn's multiple comparison test. The two-tailed statistical analyses were conducted at P=0.05. Prism summarizes test results as not significant (ns) at P>0.05, significant (symbolized by “*”) at 0.01<P≤0.05, very significant (symbolized by “**”) at 0.001<P≤0.01, and extremely significant (symbolized by “***”) at P≤0.001.
The following results were obtained with the statistical significance calculated with Kruskal-Wallis with Post-hoc Dunn's multiple comparison test:
For Groups 7-9 treated with a combination of Compound A and 3 mg/kg trastuzumab, Group 7 produced significantly stronger inhibition that the corresponding monotherapies I Groups 2 and 5 (P<0.01). Groups 8 and 9 were excluded from statistical evaluations due to the small final group size.
For Groups 10-12 treated with a combination of Compound A and 10 mg/kg trastuzuab, Group 10 produced significantly stronger activity than the Compound A monotherapy in Group 2 and trastuzumab monotherapy in Group 6. Group 11 produced significant activity (P<0.001), and 6 partial regressions. The Group 6 combination was significantly superior to Compound A monotherapy in Group 3 and trastuzumab monotherapy in Group 6. Group 12 was excluded from statistical evaluations due to the small final group size.
Experiments were performed in female HSD: athymic nude-Foxn1nu mice approximately 8-10 weeks of age and weighing approximately 19-25 grams. The mice were allowed to acclimate with access to food and water ad libitum for 6 days prior to the study. When body weight loss reaches 15% compared to the first day of treatment, DietGel® was provided to the animals.
The mice were divided into five groups each comprising ten mice. Treatments were initiated 34 days post-implantation of the HBCx-5 xenograft tumor. HBCx-5 is a xenograft derived from primary breast carcinoma. It is a ductal adenocarcinoma with wild-type TP53, high RB expression and HER2 overexpression. For xenograft implantation, the mice were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride and 10 mg/kg xylazine. Using asceptic technique, the mice were grafted in interscapular with 3 mm on 3 mm tumor fragment. Animals were randomized according to tumor volume such that the mean tumor volume and range were statistically similar between treatment groups. Tumors were measured with calipers three times per week at the start of dosing. Tumors were calculated using the formula: =width2×length/2. Tumor size and body weight were measured three times per week during the treatment period. The planned endpoints for the experiment were a treatment phase of six weeks and no follow-up phase.
Compound A was suspended at mg/ml in 0.5% methylcellulose (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.). It was homogenized by stirring vortexing and sonication. The suspension was stored at 4° C. for 7 days protected from light. Trastuzumab (Herceptin®, Roche) solution at 1 mg/ml was prepared on each administration day. Stock solution at 21 mg/ml was diluted just before administration at 1 mg/ml with sterile water for injection. Capecitabine (Xeloda®, Roche) at 540 mg/ml was kept at 4° C. protected from light. Capecitabine pellets were crushed and suspended in NaCl 0.9%.
Compound A was administered daily by oral gavage (p.o.) at 50 mg/kg for 42 days, alone or in combination with trastuzumab. Trastuzumab was administered at 10 mg/kg, i.p., once a week for 6 weeks. Dose was body weight adjusted at each injection.
Capecitabine was administered by oral gavage (p.o.) at 540 mg/ml, five times per week for two weeks (i.e., five consecutive dosing days/week). After a one week rest, a second treatment cycle was performed.
Antitumor activity is expressed as T/C % (mean change of tumor volume of treated animals/mean change of tumor volume of control animals)×100. Tumor volume and relative body weight were used for statistical analysis. Group comparisons were performed using a Mann Whitney non parametric test between treated group and control group.
In this study, Compound A administered as 50 mg/kg single agent demonstrated a significant antitumor activity on HBCx-5 breast xenograft model (T/C=17.57%, p<0.001). Trastuzumab administered at 10 mg/kg single agent did not demonstrate any significant antitumor activity (T/C—81.44%). Compound A at 50 mg/kg in combination with trastuzumab at 10 mg/kg demonstrated a significant antitumor activity (T/C—19.44%, p<0.001). However, the antitumor activity of the combined dosing was not significantly different to the Compound A single agent. No partial or complete regressions were observed.
Compound A, used alone or in combination with trastuzumab, was well tolerated. A maximal body weight loss of 9.5% was reached 10 days after first dosing and stabilized until end of study. This weight loss was significant but acceptable. No significant weight loss was observed for trastuzumab alone. When compound A was administered in combination with trastuzumab, a significant but tolerable weight loss of 7.9% was observed.
Capecitabine administered as 40 mg/kg single agent was very active in HBCx-5 breast xenograft model (T/C=9.03%, p<0.001). Capecitabine induced a significant and transient body weight loss of 9.1%.
Using the study protocol described in Example 4, the effect of Compound A was studied as monotherapy and in combination with lapatinib in NCI-N87 gastric cancer CB17 SCID mouse xenograft model. The female CB17 SCID mice (Fox Chase SCID®, CB17/lcr-Prkdcscid, Charles River) were 10 weeks old and had a body weight (BW) range of 15.8-21.9 g on day 1 of the study. The NCI-N87 cells were harvested with 5× trypsin. Eight days after tumor implantation (on Day 1 of the study), mice with an individual tumor volume of 88-196 mm3 were sorted into 10 groups of ten mice with a group mean tumor volume of 143-149 mm3.
Replacing the trastuzumab used in Example 4, lapatinib (Tykerb®, GlaxoSmithKline, 250 mg tablet) was suspended in 0.5% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: 0.1% Tween® 80: 99.4% deionized water (Vehicle 2) for dosing. A fresh lapatinib suspension was prepared once weekly, stored at 4° C., and protected from light.
Treatments started eight days post tumor cell implantation and lasted for 59 consecutive days or until tumor volume=1000 mm3. Compound A was orally administered once daily to NCI-N87 tumor bearing animals, and lapatinib was orally administered either twice daily (b.i.d.) for 21 days or once daily for 21 days. For the b.i.d. dosing schedule, the first dose was given p.m. on Day 1 and last dose a.m. on Day 22. For combination therapies, lapatinib was dosed within 30 minutes after Compound A. Dosing volume (10 mL/kg, was scaled to the weight of each animal as determined on day of dosing, except on weekends when the previous BW was carried forward. Controls (Group 1) consisted of animals receiving a mixture of NMP/PEG300/Solutol HS15/water (10:30:20:40% vol/vol) (Vehicle 1) per oral (p.o.) once daily and 0.5% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: 0.1% Tween® 80: 99.4% deionized water (Vehicle 2) per oral once daily. Groups 2 and 3 received monotherapies with 12.5 and 25 mg/kg Compound A, respectively. Group 4 received lapatinib monotherapy at 50 mg/kg b.i.d. Groups 5 and 6 received monotherapiess with 100 and 150 mg/kg lapatinib, respectively, once daily. Groups 7 and 8 received 12.5 and 25 mg/kg Compound A, respectively, once daily, each in combination with lapatinib once daily. Group 9 received 12.5 mg/kg Compound A once daily in combination with 50 mg/kg lapatinib b.i.d., wherein Compound A was dosed together with the p.m. dose of lapatinib. Group 10 received 12.5 mg/kg Compound A once daily in combination with 150 mg/kg lapatinib once daily. Treatment for Groups 7, 8, 9 and 10 was terminated early. Body weights were recorded on Days 1-5, on each treatment day (except weekends), and twice weekly thereafter until end of the study.
Where applicable, data is presented as mean±SEM. Each animal was euthanized when its neoplasm reached the endpoint volume (1000 mm3), or on the last day of the study (Day 59). Time to endpoint (TTE) is calculated by the equation: TTE=(log10(endpoint volume)−b)/m, where TTE is expressed in days, endpoint volume is in mm3, b is the intercept and m is the slope of the line obtained by linear regression of a log-transformed tumor growth data set. Treatment efficacy was determined from Tumor Growth Delay (TGD), which was defined as the increase in the median time to endpoint (TTE) for a treatment group compared to the control group (TGD=T−C), expressed in days, or as a percentage of the median TTE of the control group (% TGD=((T−C)/C)×100), wherein T=median TTE for a treatment group and C=median TTE for the designated control group.
Statistical and graphical analyses was performed with Prism 3.03 (GraphPad) for Windows. For all tests, the level of significance of differences was done using ANOVA, with Bartlett's test; and a post-hoc Dunnett's multiple comparison test compared the mean change for each drub-treated group to the mean for Group 1. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The logrank test was employed to analyze the significance of the difference between the overall survival experiences of two groups, based on time to endpoint (TTE) values. The two-tailed statistical analyses were conducted at P=0.05. Prism summarizes test results as not significant (ns) at P>0.05, significant (symbolized by “*”) at 0.01<P<0.05, very significant (symbolized by “**”) at 0.001<P<0.01, and extremely significant (symbolized by “***”) at P<0.001.
The following results were obtained with the statistical significance calculated with the Logrank test:
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/033,764, filed on Jul. 12, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/721,064, filed May 26, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/879,644, filed Apr. 16, 2013, which is a National Stage Entry of PCT/EP2011/069522, filed Nov. 7, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/411,117, filed Nov. 8, 2010, the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61411117 | Nov 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16033764 | Jul 2018 | US |
| Child | 16573909 | US | |
| Parent | 14721064 | May 2015 | US |
| Child | 16033764 | US | |
| Parent | 13879644 | Apr 2013 | US |
| Child | 14721064 | US |
