1. Field of the Invention
Membrane proteins, especially integral membrane proteins, have to be inserted cotranslationally into the endoplasmic reticulum. This occurs via the translocon, which is a channel formed by the Sec61-subunits. During and after synthesis of membrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, they undergo a strict quality control to ensure correct folding before they are transported to their definitive site of action.
2. Prior Art
Several aspects of this quality control are incompletely understood; nevertheless it is clear that incorrectly folding of a membrane protein is sensed by the machinery of the endoplasmic reticulum (that is by chaperons, presumably). This leads to activation of ubiquitinating enzymes on the cytoplasmic side. These transfer ubiquitin to the cytoplasmic peptide chain of the incorrectly folded protein which is retrotranslocated through the Sec61 channel and degraded by the 26S proteasome (Kostova and Wolf, 2003). It has to be stressed that this scheme relies predominantly on observations that were made in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Based on several pieces of experimental evidence, it is, however, reasonable to assume that the higher eukaryotes employ a related machinery to eliminate misfolded proteins.
It has been increasingly appreciated that many human diseases can be linked to mutations, which result in the retention of the aberrant protein in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Cystic fibrosis is most commonly cited as the model disease: More than 1000 mutations have been identified in the gene encoding the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) (Rowntree and Harris, 2003), but the majority of the patients (˜70%) have the ΔF508-mutation of the CFTR.
The resulting protein can function properly, if it reaches the plasma membrane; however, it fails to reach the plasma membrane due to an overprotective ER quality control mechanism (Pasyk and Foskett, 1995). There are many more examples that lead to defective ER-export of membrane proteins; these include mutations of the V2-vasopressin receptor (associated with diabetes insipidus; Oksche and Rosenthal, 1998), of the LDL-receptor (resulting in hypercholesterinaemia; Hobbs et al., 1990; Jorgensen et al., 2000), or of the HERG-K+-channel (resulting in long QT-syndrome-2; Kupershmidt et al., 2002) etc.
It is unclear why these mutated proteins are retained and eventually degraded although they are—at least in part—functionally active (see Pasyk and Foskett, 1995). However, the available evidence suggests that the quality control machinery in the endoplasmic reticulum is overprotective.
It is known that proteasome inhibitors may enhance the expression of membrane proteins on the cell surface, cf. e.g. Jensen T J et al.; Cell. 1995 Oct. 6; 83(1): 129-35.
Furthermore, it has been found (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/886,202, unpublished) that de-ubiquitinating enzymes, such as USP-4 are useful in enhancing the expression of membrane proteins on the cell surface.
It is an object of the present invention to provide means for enhancing the expression of membrane proteins, especially integral membrane proteins, on the cell surface. Especially, it is an object of the present invention to provide means for enhancing the expression of a protein selected from the group consisting of CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), V2-vasopressin receptor, LDL-receptor and HERG-K+-channel and, furthermore, to provide a medicament for the treatment of a disease or condition selected from the group consisting of cystic fibrosis, diabetes insipidus, hypercholesterinaemia and long QT-syndrome-2.
This object is achieved by the subject matter of the independent claims. Preferred embodiments are disclosed in the dependent claims.
Bortezomib (N-(2-pyrazine)carbonyl-L-phenylalanine-L-leucine-boronic acid) is a known anti-cancer agent with proteasome-inhibiting activity (EP 0 788 360 A, EP 1 123 412 A, WO 04/156854).
While proteasome inhibitors such as MG132 have been found to cause cell apoptosis even at very small administration dosage, it has surprisingly been found that there is a therapeutic window for administering Bortezomib, whereby expression of membrane proteins such as CFTR or its most common ΔF508-mutation is enhanced whilst no increased cell mortality is observed.
In the case of HE 293 cells, this therapeutical window is between 1 nM and 100 nM Bortezomib, preferably from 3 nM to 10 nM. The skilled artisan can easily adapt the pharmaceutically acceptable dosis of Bortezomib depending on the disease to be treated.
In addition, stimulating the deubiquitinating activity in a cell, especially by increasing the amount of deubiquitinating enzymes in the cell or stimulating them, furthermore enhances the expression of integral membrane proteins on the cell surface. Especially, deubiquitinating enzymes are capable of decreasing the level of overprotective quality control in the endoplasmatic reticulum.
Increasing the amount of deubiquitinating enzymes in the cell can be achieved especially by introducing into the cell a compound selected from the group consisting of
a deubiquitinating enzyme
a nucleic acid sequence encoding a deubiquitinating enzyme.
Especially, the cell may be transfected with an appropriate plasmid containing DNA encoding the deubiquitinating enzyme, followed by expression of the enzyme in the cell.
The ways to introduce a deubiquitinating enzyme or the nucleic acid sequence encoding the enzyme, as well as identifying suitable amounts of compound to be introduced, are known to the skilled artisan or can be determined using knowledge which is well available to the skilled artisan.
Preferably the deubiquitinating enzyme is selected from the group consisting of ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolases (UCH) and ubiquitin specific proteases (USP). USPs are also being referred to as ubiquitin processing proteases (UBPs; Wing, 2003).
Deubiquitinating enzymes are thiol proteases which hydrolyse the amide bond between Gly76 of ubiquitin and the substrate protein. There are two classes of deubiquitinating enzymes; the ubiquitin-specific processing protease or USP class is one of these two known classes of deubiquitinating enzymes (Papa and Hochstrasser, 1993). While the catalytic activity has been tested using artificial substrates, very little is known about their physiological substrates and thus their physiological functions. USPs have been shown to play a role in determination of cell fate (fat facets; Huang et al. (1995), transcriptional silencing (UBP3; Moazed and Johnson, D. (1996)), response to cytokines (DUB1 and 2; Zhu et al., 1996) and oncogenic transformation (tre-2, USP4; Gilchrist and Baker, 2000), but the mechanistic details have remained enigmatic.
In an especially preferred embodiment, the deubiquitinating enzyme is USP-4. The sequence of murine USP-4 enzyme is, for example, disclosed in Strausberg, R. L., et al.; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (26), 16899-16903 (2002). Human USP-4 exists in two variants, cf. Puente, X. S. et al., Nat. Rev. Genet. 4 (7), 544-558 (2003).
The method of the present invention enables especially expression of a protein selected from the group consisting of CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), V2-vasopressin receptor, LDL-receptor and HERG-K+-channel.
Furthermore, the method of the present invention can be used for the treatment of conditions or diseases related to or associated with the lack of expression of membrane proteins on the cell surface.
Especially, the method of the present invention enables treatment of a disease or condition selected from the group consisting of cystic fibrosis, diabetes insipidus, hypercholesterinaemia and long QT-syndrome-2.
The present invention is also directed to a pharmaceutical composition, comprising a therapeutically effective amount of Bortezomib and/or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or ester thereof, and a compound stimulating deubiquitinating activity in a cell.
Preferably, said compound is selected from the group consisting of
a deubiquitinating enzyme
a nucleic acid sequence encoding a deubiquitinating enzyme.
a, 2b and 2c, respectively, show the result of fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-monitoring of the expression of GFP-tagged CFTR from HEK293 cells.
a, 3b and 3c, respectively, show the result of FACS-monitoring of the expression of GFP-tagged CFTR-Δ508 from HEK293 cells.
In the following examples, the effect of USP-4, MG 132 and Bortezomib, respectively, on the expression of the ΔF508-mutation of CFTR was examined.
HEK293 cells (1*106 cells) were transfected with plasmids encoding CFTR or CFTR-ΔF508 (GFP-tagged) and/or co-transfected with effector plasmids. After 16 h, the cells were treated with the varying concentrations of compounds. After 24 h, the cells were harvested in phosphate-buffered saline, lysed by a freeze-thaw cycle and homogenized by sonication. The homogenate was resuspended in reducing Laemmli sample buffer (50 mM Tris.Hcl, pH 6.8, 20% glycerol, 0.1% bromophenol blue, 2% SDS and 20 mM dithiothreitol); aliquots (15% of the original culture) were resolved on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel (monomer concentration in the stacking gel and in the running gel 4 and 8% respectively) and electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Immunodetection was done with an antiserum directed against GFP as the primary antibody and an anti-rabbit IgG coupled to horseradish peroxidase as the secondary antibody. Immunoreactive bands were revealed by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL kit, Super Signal Pierce).
Cultured HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding CFTR or CFTR-ΔF508 (GFP-tagged) and/or co-transfected with plasmids encoding USP4 (or an appropriate control plasmid) by using the CaPO4-precipitation method. Sixteen hours after transfection the cells were treated with varying concentrations of compounds. At a specific time point (here 24 h) the cells are trypsinized, fixed in ethanol, permeabilized and stained with propidium iodide (PI). The stained cells are subjected to FACS analysis
In a first example, Membranes from transfected cells were prepared and immunoblotted for GFP-tagged CFTR or CFTR-ΔF508, respectively (by using an antibody directed against the fluorescent protein).
The membrane extract was also treated endoglycosidase H. The rationale for this experiment is as follows: membrane proteins are core glycosylated in the endoplasmatic reticulum. Core glycosylation is sensitive to endoglycosidase H. If the protein has reached the Golgi (and then trafficked to the plasma membrane), it acquires additional sugar moieties and becomes resistant to endoglycosidase H. It is evident from lane 3 in
Because CFTR is tagged with a fluorescent protein, expression in individual cells can be monitored by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). By contrast with fluorescence microscopy (where individual cells are picked), FACS allows to survey the entire cell population. In addition, FACS has the advantage that it allows for reasonable sample throughput; finally, automation and scale-up is readily possible.
Transiently transfected HE 293 cells were fixed in ethanol 24 h after transfection as mentioned above and then stained with propidium iodide to label the DNA: the rationale was to examine the distribution of cells in the cell cycle (=to see if the expression of CFTR or of CFTR-ΔF508 was toxic or if the compounds employed killed the cells/drove them into apoptosis).
The original data set is shown on the right hand side of the figures, respectively (see e.g.
One can plot the cell counts against the propidium iodide fluorescence of the transfected cells (such as shown in, for example,
The distribution of cells expressing CFTR and CFTR-ΔF508 was comparable (cf.
a and
However, if one examines the original data set (
Thus if one examines the cell cycle distribution of CFTR-ΔF508 expressing cells (
This is however not the case with 10 nM bortezomib (
Using the FACS assay, it was furthermore tested whether enzymatic deubiquitination by USP-4 raised the accumulation of CFTR-ΔF508; this is documented in
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1144/2005 | Jul 2005 | AT | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/AT06/00282 | 7/3/2006 | WO | 00 | 7/28/2008 |