Use of agents to reduce crystallinity in polypropylene for BOPP applications

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10683408
  • Patent Number
    10,683,408
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 27, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 16, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
The BOPP film includes a polypropylene, an absence of a nucleating agent, and an additive blended with the polypropylene forming a polypropylene/additive blend, wherein the additive is potassium stearate.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.


REFERENCE TO A MICROFICHE APPENDIX

Not applicable


BACKGROUND
Technical Field

This disclosure relates to biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) films and the manufacture thereof.


Background

Biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) film is used in a wide variety of flexible packaging applications. In the BOPP process, polypropylene is cast to form a sheet that is partially or wholly crystallized. The sheet is then biaxially oriented to form a thin film. As used herein, the term “biaxial orientation” refers to a process in which a polymeric composition is heated to a temperature at or above its glass-transition temperature. Immediately following heating, the material may then be extruded into a film, and stretched in both a longitudinal direction (i.e., the machine direction) and in a transverse or lateral direction (i.e., the tenter direction). Such stretching may be carried out simultaneously or sequentially.


SUMMARY

An embodiment of the present disclosure includes a BOPP film. The BOPP film includes a polypropylene, an absence of a nucleating agent, and an additive blended with the polypropylene forming a polypropylene/additive blend, wherein the additive is potassium stearate.


In another embodiment of the present disclosure, a process of manufacturing a BOPP film is disclosed. The process includes blending polypropylene with an additive to form a polypropylene/additive blend without adding a nucleating agent, wherein the additive is potassium stearate, casting the polypropylene/additive blend to form a sheet, and biaxially orienting the sheet to form a thin film.


In another embodiment of the present disclosure, a method of reducing the crystallization rate during processing of BOPP films is disclosed. The method includes blending polypropylene with an additive to form a polypropylene/additive blend without adding a nucleating agent and forming a thin film from the propylene/additive blend, wherein the additive is potassium stearate.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following brief description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts.



FIG. 1 is a graph depicting the value of yield stress in the machine direction as a function of heating temperature as measured by the Bruckner Karo IV Laboratory Stretcher for polypropylene grades 3270, 3273, and 3371.



FIG. 2 is a graph depicting time for recrystallization halftime at 122° C. versus heat flow for polypropylene grades 3270, 3273, and 3371.



FIG. 3 is a graph depicting the percentage of material crystallized for polypropylene grades 3270, 3270 with an additive, 3273, and 3371, as a function of time.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A detailed description will now be provided. The description includes specific embodiments, versions and examples, but the disclosure is not limited to these embodiments, versions or examples, which are included to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to make and use the disclosure when that information is combined with available information and technology.


Various terms as used herein are shown below. To the extent a term used in a claim is not defined below, it should be given the broadest definition skilled persons in the pertinent art have given that term as reflected in printed publications and issued patents at the time of filing. Further, unless otherwise specified, all compounds described herein may be substituted or unsubstituted and the listing of compounds includes derivatives thereof.


Disclosed herein are polymeric compositions and articles made therefrom. In some embodiments, the polymeric compositions include polyolefins, including, but not limited to polypropylene. Non-limiting examples of suitable polyolefins in this disclosure include homopolymers and copolymers of polypropylene.


In an embodiment, the polyolefin is polypropylene. The polypropylene may be a homopolymer. Polypropylene homopolymers suitable for use in this disclosure may include any type of polypropylene. For example, the polypropylene homopolymer may be atactic polypropylene, isotactic polypropylene, hemi-isotactic polypropylene, syndiotactic polypropylene, or combinations thereof. A polymer is “atactic” when its pendant groups are arranged in a random fashion on both sides of the chain of the polymer. In contrast, a polymer is “isotactic” when all of its pendant groups are arranged on the same side of the chain and “syndiotactic” when its pendant groups alternate on opposite sides of the chain. In hemi-isotactic polymer, every other repeat unit has a random substituent.


In an embodiment, a polypropylene homopolymer suitable for use in this disclosure may have a density of from 0.895 g/cc to 0.920 g/cc, alternatively from 0.900 g/cc to 0.915 g/cc, and alternatively from 0.905 g/cc to 0.915 g/cc as determined in accordance with ASTM D1505; a melting temperature of from 150° C. to 170° C., alternatively from 155° C. to 168° C., and alternatively from 160° C. to 165° C. as determined by differential scanning calorimetry; a melt flow rate of from 0.5 g/10 min. to 50 g/10 min., alternatively from 1.0 g/10 min. to 10 g/10 min., and alternatively from 1.5 g/10 min. to 5.0 g/10 min. as determined in accordance with ASTM D1238 condition “L”; a tensile modulus of from 200,000 psi to 350,000 psi; alternatively from 220,000 psi to 320,000 psi, and alternatively from 250,000 psi to 320,000 psi as determined in accordance with ASTM D638; a tensile stress at yield of from 3,000 psi to 6,000 psi, alternatively from 3,500 psi to 5,500 psi, and alternatively from 4,000 psi to 5,500 psi as determined in accordance with ASTM D638; a tensile strain at yield of from 5% to 30%, alternatively from 5% to 20%, and alternatively from 5% to 15% as determined in accordance with ASTM D638; a flexural modulus of from 120,000 psi to 330,000 psi, alternatively from 190,000 psi to 310,000 psi, and alternatively of from 220,000 psi to 300,000 psi as determined in accordance with ASTM D790; a Gardner impact of from 3 in-lb to 50 in-lb, alternatively from 5 in-lb to 30 in-lb, and alternatively from 9 in-lb to 25 in-lb as determined in accordance with ASTM D2463; a Notched Izod Impact Strength of from 0.2 ft lb/in to 20 ft lb/in, alternatively from 0.5 ft lb/in to 15 ft lb/in, and alternatively from 0.5 ft lb/in to 10 ft lb/in as determined in accordance with ASTM D256A; a hardness shore D of from 30 to 90, alternatively from 50 to 85, and alternatively from 60 to 80 as determined in accordance with ASTM D2240; and a heat distortion temperature of from 50° C. to 125° C., alternatively from 80° C. to 115° C., and alternatively from 90° C. to 110° C. as determined in accordance with ASTM D648.


Non-limiting examples of polypropylene homopolymers suitable for use in this disclosure include without limitation 3371, 3273, and 3270, which are polypropylene homopolymers commercially available from Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc. In an embodiment, the polypropylene homopolymer (e.g., 3371) has generally the physical properties set forth in Table 1.











TABLE 1






3371



Properties
Typical Value
Test Method















Physical









Density, g/cc
0.905
ASTM D1505


Melt Flow Rate
2.8 
ASTM D1238


(MFR), g/10 min.


Melting Point
325 (163)
DSC


(DSC), ° F. (° C.)







Oriented Film Properties









Haze
 1%
ASTM D1003


Gloss 45°
90%
ASTM D2457


Elongation
130% MD, 50% TD
ASTM D882


Ultimate Tensile
19,000 psi MD, 38,000 psi TD
ASTM D882


Tensile Modulus
350,000 psi MD, 600,000 psi TD
ASTM D882


WVTR
0.3 g/100 in 2/24 hrs/mil
ASTM F-1249-90



@ 100° F., 90% RH









In another embodiment, the polypropylene may be a high crystallinity polypropylene homopolymer (HCPP). The HCPP may contain primarily isotactic polypropylene. The isotacticity in polymers may be measured via 13C NMR spectroscopy using meso pentads and can be expressed as percentage of meso pentads (% mmmm). As used herein, the term “meso pentads” refers to successive methyl groups located on the same side of the polymer chain. In an embodiment, the HCPP has a meso pentads percentage of greater than 95%, or greater than 98%, or greater than 99%. The HCPP may comprise some amount of atactic or amorphous polymer. The atactic portion of the polymer is soluble in xylene, and is thus termed the xylene soluble fraction (XS %). In determining XS %, the polymer is dissolved in boiling xylene and then the solution cooled to 0° C. that results in the precipitation of the isotactic or crystalline portion of the polymer. The XS % is that portion of the original amount that remained soluble in the cold xylene. Consequently, the XS % in the polymer is indicative of the extent of crystalline polymer formed. The total amount of polymer (100%) is the sum of the xylene soluble fraction and the xylene insoluble fraction, as determined in accordance with ASTM D5492-98. In an embodiment, the HCPP has a xylene soluble fraction of less than 1.5%, or less than 1.0%, or less than 0.5%.


In an embodiment, an HCPP suitable for use in this disclosure may have a density of from 0.895 g/cc to 0.920 g/cc, alternatively from 0.900 g/cc to 0.915 g/cc, and alternatively from 0.905 g/cc to 0.915 g/cc as determined in accordance with ASTM D1505; a melt flow rate of from 0.5 g/10 min. to 500 g/10 min., alternatively from 1.0 g/10 min. to 100 g/10 min., and alternatively from 1.5 g/10 min. to 20 g/10 min. as determined in accordance with ASTM D1238; a secant modulus in the machine direction (MD) of from 350,000 psi to 420,000 psi; alternatively from 380,000 psi to 420,000 psi, and alternatively from 400,000 psi to 420,000 psi as determined in accordance with ASTM D882; a secant modulus in the transverse direction (TD) of from 400,000 psi to 700,000 psi, alternatively from 500,000 psi to 700,000 psi, and alternatively from 600,000 psi to 700,000 psi as determined in accordance with ASTM D882; a tensile strength at break in the MD of from 19,000 psi to 28,000 psi, alternatively from 22,000 psi to 28,000 psi, and alternatively from 25,000 psi to 28,000 psi as determined in accordance with ASTM D882; a tensile strength at break in the TD of from 20,000 psi to 40,000 psi, alternatively from 30,000 psi to 40,000 psi, and alternatively of from 35,000 psi to 40,000 psi as determined in accordance with ASTM D882; an elongation at break in the MD from 50% to 200%, alternatively from 100% to 180%, and alternatively from 120% to 150% as determined in accordance with ASTM D882; an elongation at break in the TD of from 50% to 150%, alternatively from 60% to 100%, and alternatively from 80% to 100% as determined in accordance with ASTM D882; a melting temperature of from 150° C. to 170° C., alternatively from 155° C. to 170° C., and alternatively from 160° C. to 170° C. as determined by differential scanning calorimetry; a gloss at 45° of from 70 to 95, alternatively from 75 to 90, and alternatively from 80 to 90 as determined in accordance with ASTM D2457; a percentage haze of from 0.5% to 2.0%, alternatively from 0.5% to 1.5%, and alternatively from 0.5% to 1.0% as determined in accordance with ASTM D1003; and a water vapor transmission rate of from 0.15 to 0.30 g-mil/100 in2/day, alternatively from 0.15 to 0.25 g-mil/100 in2/day, and alternatively from 0.20 to 0.21 g-mil/100 in2/day as determined in accordance with ASTM F-1249-90.


An example of an HCPP suitable for use in this disclosure includes without limitation 3270, which is an HCPP commercially available from Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc. The HCPP (e.g., 3270) may generally have the physical properties set forth in Table 2.











TABLE 2






3270



Properties
Typical Value
Test Method















Physical









Density, g/cc
0.91
ASTM D1505


Melt Flow Rate
2.0 
ASTM D1238


(MFR), g/10 min.


Melting Point
329 (165)
DSC


(DSC), ° F. (° C.)







Oriented Film Properties









Haze
 1%
ASTM D1003


Gloss 45°
85%
ASTM D2457


Elongation
150% MD, 60% TD
ASTM D882


Ultimate Tensile
28,000 psi MD, 39,000 psi TD
ASTM D882


Tensile Modulus
420,000 psi MD, 700,000 psi TD
ASTM D882


WVTR
0.2 g/100 in 2/24 hrs/mil
ASTM F-1249-90



@ 100° F., 90% RH









Another example of an HCPP is 3273, which is an HCPP commercially available from Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc. 3273 may generally have the physical properties set forth in Table 3.











TABLE 3






3273



Properties
Typical Value
Test Method















Physical









Density, g/cc
0.905
ASTM D1505


Melt Flow Rate
2.0 
ASTM D1238


(MFR), g/10 min.


Melting Point
325 (163)
DSC (2)


(DSC), ° F. (° C.)







Oriented Film Properties









Haze
 1%
ASTM D1003


Gloss 45°
85%
ASTM D2457


Elongation
150% MD, 60% TD
ASTM D882


Ultimate Tensile
24,000 psi MD, 38,000 psi TD
ASTM D882


Tensile Modulus
400,000 psi MD, 686,000 psi TD
ASTM D882


WVTR
0.25 g/100 in 2/24 hrs/mil
ASTM F-1249-90



@ 100° F., 90% RH









In another embodiment, the polypropylene may be a polypropylene copolymer. In certain embodiments, the polypropylene copolymer may be a propylene random copolymer. Examples of polypropylene copolymers include propylene random copolymers made from Zieger-Natta catalysts, such as the 6000-, 7000-, and 8000-series commercially available from Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc. In other embodiments, the propylene-based polymers may be a “mini-random” polypropylene. A mini-random polypropylene has less than about 1.0 wt % of the comonomer. In certain embodiments, the comonomer in the mini-random polypropylene is ethylene.


In another embodiment, the polypropylene is a high melt strength polypropylene. A high melt strength polypropylene may be a semi-crystalline polypropylene or polypropylene copolymer matrix containing a heterophasic copolymer. The heterophasic copolymer may include ethylene and higher alpha-olefin polymer such as amorphous ethylene-propylene copolymer, for example.


Polyolefins suitable for use in this disclosure may be prepared using any suitable method. For example, the polyolefin may be prepared using a Ziegler-Natta catalyst, metallocene catalyst, or combinations thereof. The polyethylene, for example, may be prepared using a chromium oxide catalyst, or any other suitable catalysts.


In an embodiment, the polyolefin is prepared using Ziegler-Natta catalysts, which are typically based on titanium and organometallic aluminum compounds, for example triethylaluminum (C2H5)3Al. Ziegler-Natta catalysts and processes for forming such catalysts are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,298,718; 4,544,717; and 4,767,735, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


In another embodiment, the polyolefin may be prepared using a metallocene catalyst. Metallocene catalysts may be characterized generally as coordination compounds incorporating one or more cyclopentadienyl (Cp) groups (which may be substituted or unsubstituted, each substitution being the same or different) coordinated with a transition metal through π bonding. Examples of metallocene catalysts and processes for forming such catalysts are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,794,096 and 4,975,403, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Examples of polyolefins prepared through the use of metallocene catalysts are described in further detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,158,920; 5,416,228; 5,789,502; 5,807,800; 5,968,864; 6,225,251; 6,777,366; 6,777,367; 6,579,962; 6,468,936; 6,579,962; and 6,432,860, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


The polyolefin may also be prepared using any other catalyst or catalyst system such as a combination of Ziegler-Natta and metallocene catalysts, for example as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,056,991 and 6,653,254, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


The polyolefin may be formed by placing one or more olefin monomers alone or with other monomers in a suitable reaction vessel in the presence of a catalyst (e.g., Ziegler-Nana, metallocene, etc.) and under suitable reaction conditions for polymerization thereof. Any suitable equipment and processes for polymerizing the olefin into a polymer may be used. For example, such processes may include solution phase, gas phase, slurry phase, bulk phase, high pressure processes or combinations thereof. Such processes are described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,525,678; 6,420,580; 6,380,328; 6,359,072; 6,346,586; 6,340,730; 6,339,134; 6,300,436; 6,274,684; 6,271,323; 6,248,845; 6,245,868; 6,245,705; 6,242,545; 6,211,105; 6,207,606; 6,180,735; and 6,147,173, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.


In an embodiment, the polyolefin is formed by a gas phase polymerization process. One example of a gas phase polymerization process includes a continuous cycle system, wherein a cycling gas stream (otherwise known as a recycle stream or fluidizing medium) is heated in a reactor by heat of polymerization. The heat is removed from the cycling gas stream in another part of the cycle by a cooling system external to the reactor. The cycling gas stream containing one or more monomers may be continuously cycled through a fluidized bed in the presence of a catalyst under reactive conditions. The cycling gas stream is generally withdrawn from the fluidized bed and recycled back into the reactor. Simultaneously, polymer product may be withdrawn from the reactor and fresh monomer may be added to replace the polymerized monomer. The reactor pressure in a gas phase process may vary from 100 psig to 500 psig, or from 200 psig to 400 psig, or from 250 psig to 350 psig. The reactor temperature in a gas phase process may vary from 30° C. to 120° C., or from 60° C. to 115° C., or from 70° C. to 110° C., or from 70° C. to 95° C., for example as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,543,399; 4,588,790; 5,028,670; 5,317,036; 5,352,749; 5,405,922; 5,436,304; 5,456,471; 5,462,999; 5,616,661; 5,627,242; 5,665,818; 5,677,375; and 5,668,228, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.


In an embodiment, the polyolefin is formed by a slurry phase polymerization process. Slurry phase processes generally include forming a suspension of solid, particulate polymer in a liquid polymerization medium, to which monomers and optionally hydrogen, along with catalyst, are added. The suspension (which may include diluents) may be intermittently or continuously removed from the reactor where the volatile components can be separated from the polymer and recycled, optionally after a distillation, to the reactor. The liquefied diluent employed in the polymerization medium may include a C3 to C7 alkane (e.g., hexane or isobutene). The medium employed is generally liquid under the conditions of polymerization and relatively inert. A bulk phase process is similar to that of a slurry process. However, a process may be a bulk process, a slurry process or a bulk slurry process.


The BOPP film may be formed as described above. In the orientation process, previous crystal regions in the polypropylene sheet may be destroyed and then reformed to produce a high level of crystallinity with strong directional components in the two directions of orientation, i.e., MD and TD. The high level of crystallinity may result in high stiffness, and high barrier and tensile strength in the BOPP film.


In certain embodiments, the orientation process is a solid state orientation process, which may result in the destruction of crystal regions formed in the initial casting step, such as through heat and force. The rate at which polypropylene is processed to produce BOPP film may be limited by the ability to sufficiently heat the material to reduce the crystalline content, to the amount of force, as a function of the rate at which force is applied, that can be applied to the sheet, or both. For instance, when excessive force is applied at too high of a rate, the film may break or fail to uniformly orient.


Heat may be applied to the film through induction prior to each orientation step. Heat transfer limitations will limit the speed at which a material can be processed. In addition, increasing the temperatures used to heat the film during processing may result in film adherence to surfaces contacted during processing.


The level of crystallinity in the sheet may impact the amount of force and heat for drawing the thin film during processing. A film with higher crystallinity in the sheet may necessitate higher temperatures during heating, longer exposure to elevated temperature, or more force to draw compared to sheets with lower crystallinity. By reaction control during manufacture of the polypropylene, it is possible to control the level of crystallinity of the polypropylene manufactured. The level of crystallinity may be measured by the amount of polypropylene that will extract in hot xylene as a weight percentage (% XS) with more polypropylene extracting in lower crystallinity materials. Table 5 shows % XS for 3270, 3273, and 3371. While 3270, 3273, and 3371 are all homopolymer polypropylenes, each of 3270, 3273, and 3371 differ in molecular architecture giving rise to the differences in % XS.


Table 4 shows the level of crystallinity as measured by the percentage of extractable content in hot xylene (XS) and by C13 NMR (expressed as a mol % of meso repeating units) for 3270, 3273, and 3371. The data demonstrates that the three materials differ distinctly in crystallinity with the crystallinity of 3270 being higher than 3273 which is in turn higher than 3371.















TABLE 4







Value
3270
3273
3371
Units






















Xylene Solubles (XS)
0.9
1.9
4.2
%



%meso (NMR)
99
96
93
mol %



%mmmm (NMR)
98
94
89
%










In some embodiments, 3270 is more difficult to process than 3273; 3273 may be more difficult to process than 3371. Higher crystallinity polypropylene may necessitate more heat and consequently slower processing speeds than lower crystallinity material. This effect is further illustrated in FIG. 1, which illustrates the force to orient the 3270, 3273, and 3371 as measured on a Bruckner Karo IV Laboratory Stretcher at various draw temperatures. FIG. 1 shows the value of yield stress in the machine direction (MD) as a function of heating temperature as measured by the Bruckner Karo IV Laboratory Stretcher for 3270, 3273, and 3371. The figure demonstrates that more force is used to orient the sheet in higher crystallinity materials at any given heating temperature. While crystallinity may be altered during the formation of the polypropylene resin, reducing the crystallinity of the polypropylene resin may have an adverse impact on the final film properties. For instance, lower crystallinity polypropylene resins may lead to films with lower stiffness and barrier properties.


The level of crystallinity may also be controlled in the manner in which the sheet is formed. Lower formation temperatures of the sheet may be used to lower the crystallinity of the sheet to afford lower orientation forces and/or reheating temperatures. Without being bound by theory, a high level of supercooling may lead to less crystal perfection and lower level of crystallinity.


In some embodiments of the present disclosure, an additive may be used to suppress or slow crystallization, i.e., reduced the rate of crystallization, in a polypropylene material in order to reduce the force and/or temperature used to orient the material while still resulting in a film of the same properties. The additive may allow for higher processing speeds in polypropylene in which the additive is introduced without compromising the final film properties as shown in Table 5 for films oriented on the Bruckner Karo IV Laboratory Stretcher at a 5 by 5 draw ratio at 150° C. In certain embodiments, the concentration of the additive in the polypropylene may be between 100 ppm and 2000 ppm, between 400 ppm and 600 ppm, or about 500 ppm.











TABLE 5





Value
3270
3270 + Additive

















Film Thickness, mil
0.6
0.6


MD Tensile 1% Secant Modulus, kpsi
328
334


MD Tensile Strength Break, psi
31000
31100


MD Elongation, Break, %
120
130


TD Tensile 1% Secant Modulus, kpsi
350
340


TD Tensile Strength Break, psi
34000
32900


TD Elongation, Break, %
110
110


Transmittance, %
94.1
94.2


Haze, %
0.4
0.3


Falling Dart, gf
220
230









An example of such an additive is potassium stearate. FIG. 2 illustrates the effect of the addition of the additive on the crystallization of 3371, 3273, and 3270. FIG. 2 depicts time for recrystallization halftime at 122° C. versus heat flow. Comparing the crystallization of 3371, 3273, and 3270, it is apparent that as crystallinity increases the onset of crystallization becomes more rapid (FIG. 2). This is accompanied by an increase in the force to orient at a given temperature (FIG. 1). This behavior may be important in a dynamic process such as BOPP orientation. Due to the slow nature of crystallization of polypropylene compared to other materials, polypropylene may only be partially crystallized during the BOPP process. If the crystallization process can be slowed, at any given point in the BOPP process, the weight fraction of crystallinity in a cast sheet will be lower. FIG. 3 shows the percentage of material crystallized for materials with different levels of inherent crystallinity as a function of time. The effect of the addition of an additive—potassium stearate—(Al) on the crystallization of a high crystallinity product is to induce the material to behave more like a low crystallinity product as also shown in FIG. 3. The concentration of the potassium stearate in the polypropylene was 500 ppm. Thus, polypropylene having an additive is expected to process more like a lower crystallinity polypropylene requiring less heat, lower induction time, and higher process speeds. Thus, unexpectedly, the additive/polypropylene blend has a lower crystallization temperature than an identical polypropylene without the additive, regardless of the presence of other agents such as nucleating agents. However, because structure of the final film is induced through orientation in the BOPP process, the final BOPP film properties, i.e., haze, gloss 45°, elongation, ultimate tensile, tensile modulus, and WVTR, are not found to be negatively impacted by the additive. In certain embodiments, no nucleating agent is added to the polypropylene or to the polypropylene/additive blend. Unexpectedly, potassium stearate reduces crystallization temperature of the polypropylene/additive blend even in the absence of a nucleating agent. Further, in certain embodiments, the additive is added to the polypropylene during manufacturing or during a secondary step.


In certain embodiments, the BOPP films are single layer films. In other embodiments, the BOPP films may form one or more layers of a multilayer film. The additional layers of the multilayer film may be any coextrudable film known in the art, such as syndiotactic polypropylene, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, medium density polyethylene, high density polyethylene, ethylene-propylene copolymers, butylenes-propylene copolymers, ethylene-butylene copolymers, ethylene-propylene-butylene terpolymers, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymers, nylons, and the like, or combinations thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A process of manufacturing a BOPP film comprising: blending polypropylene with an additive to form a polypropylene/additive blend without adding a nucleating agent, wherein the additive is potassium stearate;casting the polypropylene/additive blend to form a sheet, wherein the sheet consists essentially of the propylene/additive blend wherein the level of crystallinity in the sheet during processing is less than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene; andbiaxially orienting the sheet to form a thin film.
  • 2. The process of claim 1, wherein the concentration of potassium stearate in the polypropylene/additive blend is between 100 ppm and 2000 ppm.
  • 3. The process of claim 1, wherein a speed of crystallization in the process of manufacturing the BOPP film is slower than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene.
  • 4. The process of claim 1 wherein the process of manufacturing the BOPP film requires less heat, has a lower induction time, has a higher process speed or a combination thereof than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene.
  • 5. The process of claim 1, wherein a crystallization rate in the thin film during processing is less than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene.
  • 6. The process of claim 1, wherein the haze, gloss 45°, elongation, ultimate tensile, tensile modulus, and WVTR of the thin film are not negatively impacted by the addition of the additive.
  • 7. The process of claim 1, wherein at any point during the steps of casting the polypropylene/additive blend to form a sheet and biaxially orienting the sheet to form a thin film the crystallinity will be lower than if the additive had not been blended with the polypropylene.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a nonprovisional application that claims priority from U.S. provisional application No. 62/414,111, filed Oct. 28, 2016.

US Referenced Citations (55)
Number Name Date Kind
4298718 Mayr et al. Nov 1981 A
4543399 Jenkins, III et al. Sep 1985 A
4544717 Mayr et al. Oct 1985 A
4588790 Jenkins, III et al. May 1986 A
4767735 Ewen et al. Aug 1988 A
4794096 Ewen Dec 1988 A
4975403 Ewen Dec 1990 A
5028670 Chinh et al. Jul 1991 A
5158920 Ewen Oct 1992 A
5317036 Brady, III et al. May 1994 A
5352749 DeChellis et al. Oct 1994 A
5405922 DeChellis et al. Apr 1995 A
5416228 Ewen et al. May 1995 A
5436304 Griffin et al. Jul 1995 A
5456471 MacDonald Oct 1995 A
5462999 Griffin et al. Oct 1995 A
5525678 Mink et al. Jun 1996 A
5616661 Eisinger et al. Apr 1997 A
5627242 Jacobsen et al. May 1997 A
5665818 Tilston et al. Sep 1997 A
5668228 Chinh et al. Sep 1997 A
5677375 Rifi et al. Oct 1997 A
5789502 Shamshoum et al. Aug 1998 A
5807800 Shamshoum et al. Sep 1998 A
5968864 Shamshoum et al. Oct 1999 A
6147173 Holtcamp Nov 2000 A
6180735 Wenzel Jan 2001 B1
6207606 Lue et al. Mar 2001 B1
6211105 Holtcamp Apr 2001 B1
6225251 Shamshoum et al. May 2001 B1
6242545 Jejelowo et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245705 Kissin Jun 2001 B1
6245868 Agapiou et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248845 Loveday et al. Jun 2001 B1
6271323 Loveday et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274684 Loveday et al. Aug 2001 B1
6300415 Okayama et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300436 Agapiou et al. Oct 2001 B1
6339134 Crowther et al. Jan 2002 B1
6340730 Murray et al. Jan 2002 B1
6346586 Agapiou et al. Feb 2002 B1
6359072 Whaley Mar 2002 B1
6380328 McConville et al. Apr 2002 B1
6420580 Holtcamp et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432860 Shamshoum et al. Aug 2002 B1
6468936 Reddy et al. Oct 2002 B1
6579962 Wheat et al. Jun 2003 B1
6653254 Shamshoum et al. Nov 2003 B1
6777366 Gauthier et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777367 Gauthier et al. Aug 2004 B2
7056991 Tharappel et al. Jun 2006 B2
20040033349 Henderson Feb 2004 A1
20090305069 Goeldel et al. Dec 2009 A1
20150072127 Bayona et al. Mar 2015 A1
20160145412 Lake, Jr. May 2016 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in Application No. PCT/US17/58861, dated Jan. 29, 2018, 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180118919 A1 May 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62414111 Oct 2016 US