The present invention primarily relates to the use of compositions with (i) ethofumesate according to formula (I), (ii) a safener, and (iii) bixlozone according to formula (III) or salts thereof, in the protection of wheat crop plants. The present invention also relates to the use of said compositions in the field of agriculture and for controlling harmful plants. The present invention further relates to corresponding methods.
Ethofumesate (IUPAC name 2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethylbenzofuran-5-yl methanesulfonate) of formula (I), is a known benzofurane herbicide. It is used pre- and post-emergence for grass and broad-leaved weed control in various crops, in particular sugarbeet.
Bixlozone (IUPAC name 2-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-isoxazolidin-3-one) of formula (III), and salts thereof are known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,405,357.
EP 0 113 169 A2 teaches herbicidal mixtures having synergistic activity based on the combination of (a) quizalafop, or a salt or ester thereof and (b) benazolin or a salt or ester thereof and/or ethofumesate.
WO 2008/075065 A2 pertains to the protection of wheat crops by using compositions comprising ethofumesate as herbicide, wherein the composition is applied to the wheat crop either pre-emergence or post-emergence, in particular not before ZCK 13, and wherein the composition is applied to the wheat such that an amount of ethofumesate of between about 50 g/ha and about 800 g/ha is applied.
It is known from WO 2012/148689 A1 that bixlozone and salts thereof may be used in combination with other herbicidal active ingredients.
WO 2015/127259 A1 teaches the use of 3-isoxazolidinones compounds as selective herbicides.
WO 2017/025418 A1 describes new uses of bixlozone as foliar herbicide.
WO 2018/041762 A2 pertains to methods of reducing crop damage by treating the seed of the crop with a safener before sowing, and applying bixlozone and a safener.
WO 2020/078874 A1 discloses herbicide combinations based on the combination of ethofumesate and bixlozone, optionally comprising a safener or further herbicides.
Weed Science 1975, Vol. 23, 409-413 inter alia observed that corn yields were reduced in proportion to the rate of ethofumesate applied 3 weeks before planting at rates of 2.2 to 9.0 kg/ha, and in greenhouse studies barley and wheat were about 10 times more susceptible to soil residues of ethofumesate than corn.
Weed Science 1977, Vol. 25, 252-255 reports that ethofumesate applied pre-emergence or early post-emergence at 0.8 to 4.5 kg/ha eliminated annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) seed fields.
Weed Science, 1980, Vol. 28, 292-294 evaluated in field experiments at rates from 0.6 to 4.5 kg/ha for control of volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in fall-planted perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Ethofumesate applied at 1.7 kg/ha or more to wheat in the one- to three-leaf stage eliminated the wheat. Wheat was not eliminated when ethofumesate was applied pre-emergence soon after planting or when applied at the end of November to wheat in the four-leaf to four-tiller stage.
Weed Science, 1981, Vol. 29, 712-717 reports on the effects of a pre-irrigation period on the pre-emergence activity of ethofumesate applied to dry soil, with subsequent irrigation and establishing stands of either sweet corn or winter wheat.
The herbicidal crop protection agents (herbicides) and compositions thereof known to date for controlling harmful plants or unwanted vegetation have some disadvantages, above all (a) that they have no or else insufficient herbicidal activity against specific harmful plants, (b) that the spectrum of harmful plants which can be controlled with the herbicides is not broad enough, (c) that the selectivity of herbicides in and the compatibility with crops is too low, thereby causing unwanted damage and/or unwanted reduced harvest yields of the crops, (d) that the initial herbicidal activity is not acceptable or not strong enough and/or (e) that the herbicidal activity does not last long enough. For this reason there is a constant need to develop novel herbicidal compositions which have advantages over the known ones at least in some areas.
Surprisingly, it has now been found that certain compositions with ethofumesate and bixlozone as the only herbicidal active ingredients exhibit the desired herbicidal activity and are able to control harmful plants or unwanted vegetation while at the same time exhibiting improved crop compatibility, i.e. lower crop injury, in wheat crops, especially in winter wheat.
The present invention mainly is based on the observation that safeners can reduce the crop damage caused by ethofumesate to crop plants (crops), i.e. desired plants, in particular in wheat crop plants in early post-emergence at growth stages before BBCH 13 of the crop plants, especially in winter wheat crop plants.
The use of a safener to reduce crop damage which may be caused by ethofumesate and bixlozone to crop plants has not been reported so far and is surprising because a safener typically exhibits its safening effects only for and in combination with specific herbicides or sometimes structurally similar herbicide classes.
For example, the safener mefenpyr-diethyl is effective in safening ALS-inhibitors like mesosulfuron and iodosulfuron, and esters and salts thereof.
The Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) publishes the “Herbicide Site of Action (SOA) Classification List” in which the various herbicides are grouped according to their Site of Action. These WSSA Groups are known to those skilled in the art. Herbicides from WSSA Group 15 are very long-chain fatty acid (VLCFA) synthesis inhibitor herbicides.
Ethofumesate however is not an ALS-inhibitor and does not have structural similarity to ALS-inhibitors, but belongs to WSSA group 15. In own experiments it was found that the safener mefenpyr-diethyl does not have a safening effect in wheat crop plants when used with flufenacet, a herbicide which also belongs to WSSA group 15.
Furthermore, it has been found, that the compositions used according to the invention not only bring about the weed control activity of (i) ethofumesate and (iii) bixlozone, but an enhancement of the spectrum of action with respect to the harmful plants and at the same time not (substantially) damaging the wheat crop plants which extends the range of action of the single constituents, namely ethofuimesate (constituent (i)), a safener (constituent (ii)) and bixlozone (constituent (iii)). Firstly, rates of application of the single constituents (i) and (iii) may be lowered whilst the herbicidal action remains equally good. Secondly, the composition still achieve a high degree of control of harmful plants even where the individual constituents have become totally ineffective in such a low application rate range. Thirdly, the compositions used according to the invention bring about the weed control activity with respect to harmful plants (weeds) and at the same time do not (substantially) damaging the wheat crop plants. Thus, the compositions used according to the invention allow control of harmful plants that can be controlled by ethofumesate and bixlozone, and achieve increased safety in use for the wheat crop plants.
In a first aspect, the present invention relates to the use of a composition comprising
for protection of wheat crop plants characterized in that constituents (i) and (ii), and (iii), are the only agrochemically active compounds present in said composition.
Wheat, genus Triticum, exists as a number of types. Durum wheat (Triticum durum) and emmer wheat are tetraploid wheats. Hexaploid wheats include spelt wheat, compact wheat and bread wheat. Preferably, the wheat is common wheat, Triticum aestivum. Preferably, the wheat is a winter wheat. Winter wheat is a wheat that is usually planted in autumn (such as September to December for the northern hemisphere), and typically harvested around August the following year. Most commercially available varieties of winter wheat may be treated with the compositions used in according with the present invention. Other wheat, such as autumn drilled spring wheat which has hardened off, may also be treated.
The salts of compound (III) used in the context of the present invention may be used in the form of the respective agronomically acceptable salts, such as alkali metal salts, alkaline earth salts or ammonium salts.
Definition of Constituent (ii), Safener
in which
The agrochemically active compounds used in the context of the present invention are known per se, and described inter alia in “The Pesticide Manual”, 16th edition, The British Crop Protection Council and the Royal Soc. of Chemistry, 2012 and the literature cited therein.
The compositions used according to the invention may additionally comprise one or more further components selected from the group consisting of formulation auxiliaries and additives customary in crop protection.
Preferred is a composition used according to the invention wherein fenchlorazole-ethyl (S1), mefenpyr-diethyl (S2), isoxadifen-ethyl (S3), cyprosulfamide (S4), cloquintocet-mexyl (S5), fenclorim (S6), dichlormid (S7), benoxacor (S8), furilazole (S9), oxabetrinil (S10), fluxofenim (S11), flurazole (S12) or naphthalic anhydride (S13) is the safener.
More preferred is a composition used according to the invention wherein mefenpyr-diethyl (S2), isoxadifen-ethyl (S3), cyprosulfamide (S4) or cloquintocet-mexyl (S5) is the safener.
Most preferred is a composition used according to the invention wherein mefenpyr-diethyl (S2) or cloquintocet-mexyl (S5) is the safener.
One most preferred composition used in the context of the present invention is a composition comprising (i) ethofumesate of formula (I), (ii) mefenpyr-diethyl as safener and (iii) 2-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-isoxazolidin-3-one of formula (III).
Another most preferred composition used in the context of the present invention is a composition comprising (i) ethofumesate of formula (I), (ii) cloquintocet-mexyl as safener and (iii) 2-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-isoxazolidin-3-one of formula (III).
Preferably, the weight ratio of the composition used according to the invention can be described by the weight of the total amount by weight of constituent (i) to the total amount by weight of constituent (ii) and is in the range of from 3:1 to 1:1, based on the total amount by weight of the composition.
Preferably, the weight ratio of the composition used according to the invention can be described by the weight of the total amount by weight of constituent (iii) to the total amount by weight of constituent (ii) and is in the range of from 3:1 to 1:1, based on the total amount by weight of the composition.
Preferably, the weight ratio of the composition used according to the invention can be described by the weight of the total amount by weight of constituent (i) to the total amount by weight of constituent (iii) and is in the range of from 3:1 to 1:3, based on the total amount by weight of the composition.
More preferably, the ratio by weight of the total amount by weight of constituent (i) to the total amount by weight by weight of constituent (ii) in compositions used according to the present invention is in the range of from 5:2 to 1:1, based on the total amount by weight of the composition.
More preferably, the ratio by weight of the total amount by weight of constituent (iii) to the total amount by weight by weight of constituent (ii) in compositions used according to the present invention is in the range of from 5:2 to 3:2, based on the total amount by weight of the composition.
More preferably, the ratio by weight of the total amount by weight of constituent (i) to the total amount by weight by weight of constituent (iii) in compositions used according to the present invention is in the range of from 2:1 to 1:2, based on the total amount by weight of the composition.
Most preferably, the ratio by weight of the total amount by weight of constituent (i) to the total amount by weight by weight of constituent (ii) in compositions used according to the present invention is in the range of from 5:2 to 5:4, based on the total amount by weight of the composition.
Most preferably, the ratio by weight of the total amount by weight of constituent (iii) to the total amount by weight by weight of constituent (ii) in compositions used according to the present invention is about 2:1, or is exactly 2:1, in each case based on the total amount by weight of the composition.
Most preferably, the ratio by weight of the total amount by weight of constituent (i) to the total amount by weight by weight of constituent (iii) in compositions used according to the present invention is in the range of from 3:2 to 1:2, based on the total amount by weight of the composition.
Superadditive (=synergistic) effects occur when constituents (i) and (iii) are used jointly. The herbicidal action in the compositions is in this connection regard than the sum to be expected of the actions of the individual herbicides used, as described in WO 2020/078874 A1.
The compositions used according to the present invention can be employed for controlling harmful plants in genetically modified wheat crops or wheat crops obtained by mutation/selection. These crops are distinguished as a rule by particular, advantageous properties, such as resistances to herbicidal combinations/compositions or resistances to plant diseases or causative agents of plant diseases such as particular insects or microorganisms such as fungi, bacteria or viruses. Other particular properties relate, for example, to the harvested material with regard to quantity, quality, storability, composition and specific constituents. Thus, for example, transgenic plants are known whose starch content is increased or whose starch quality is altered, or those where the harvested material has a different fatty acid composition.
The present invention also relates to a method for controlling harmful plants or unwanted vegetation, which comprises applying a composition used according to the present invention by pre-emergence, early post-emergence or post-emergence treatment to harmful plants or unwanted vegetation, parts of said harmful plants or unwanted vegetation, or the area where the harmful plants or unwanted vegetation grow, in an area under cultivation of wheat crop plants.
In the context of the present invention “controlling” denotes a significant reduction of the growth of the harmful plant(s) in comparison to the untreated harmful plants. Preferably, the growth of the harmful plant(s) is essentially diminished (60-79%), more preferably the growth of the harmful plant(s) is largely or fully suppressed (80-100%), and in particular the growth of the harmful plant(s) is almost fully or fully suppressed (90-100%).
If a herbicidal composition is applied to the soil surface before or after germination of the plant but prior to emergence from the soil, the treatment is called a pre-emergence treatment.
If a herbicidal composition is applied to the soil surface after emergence of the plant, the treatment is called a post-emergence treatment.
Preferred in the context of the present invention is the use of compositions defined in the context of the present invention in post-emergence treatment in wheat crop plants, in particular in wheat crop plants selected from the group consisting of Triticum durum and Triticum aestivum.
The typical and preferred application rates (indicated as g/ha i.e. grams of active ingredient per hectare), of constituent (i), constituent (ii), and constituent (iii), as defined in the context of the present invention, are as follows:
Own experiments have shown that compositions applied to wheat crop plants at 100-250 g/ha of constituent (i), 100 g/ha of constituent (ii), and 200 g/ha of constituent (iii) are particularly beneficial and therefore represent most preferred embodiments in the context of the present invention.
A specific most preferred composition used in the context of the present invention is a composition wherein the ratio by weight of constituent (i):constituent (ii):constituent (iii) is 1:1:2.
Another specific most preferred composition used in the context of the present invention is a composition wherein the ratio by weight of constituent (i):constituent (ii):constituent (iii) is 1.25:1:2.
Another specific most preferred composition used in the context of the present invention is a composition wherein the ratio by weight of constituent (i):constituent (ii):constituent (iii) is 1.5:1:2.
Another specific most preferred composition used in the context of the present invention is a composition wherein the ratio by weight of constituent (i):constituent (ii):constituent (iii) is 2.5:1:2.
The compositions used according to the present invention have an outstanding herbicidal activity against a broad spectrum of economically important harmful monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous harmful plants occurring in wheat crops and fields where wheat crop plants are growing.
In the context of the present text, reference may be made to growth stages according to the BBCH monograph “Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants”, 2nd a edition, 2001, ed. Uwe Meier, Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry (Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land und Forstwirtschaft).
The following BBCH cereal growth stages are of particular relevance in the context of the present invention:
Specifically, examples may be mentioned of some representatives of the monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous weed flora which can be controlled by the composition used according to the present invention, without the enumeration being a restriction to certain species.
Examples of monocotyledonous harmful plants on which the composition used according to the present invention act efficiently are from amongst the genera Hordeum spp., Echinochloa spp., Poa spp., Bromus spp., Digitaria spp., Eriochloa spp., Setaria spp., Pennisetum spp., Eleusine spp., Eragrostis spp., Panicum spp., Lolium spp., Alopecurus sp., Apera sp. Brachiaria spp., Leptochloa spp., Avena spp., Cyperus spp., Axonopris spp., Sorghum spp., Phalaris sp., and Melinus spp.
Particular examples of monocotyledonous harmful plants species on which the composition used according to the present invention act efficiently are selected from amongst the species Hordeum murinum, Echinochloa crus-galli, Poa annua, Bromus rubens L., Bromus rigidus, Bromus secalinus L., Digitaria insularis, Digitaria sanguinalis, Eriochloa gracilis, Setaria faberi, Setaria viridis, Pennisetum glaucum, Eleusine indica, Eragrostis pectinacea, Panicum miliaceum, Lolium sp., Brachiaria platyphylla, Leptochloa fusca, Avena fatua, Cyperus compressus, Cyperus esculentes, Axonopris offinis, Sorghum halapense, Alopecurus myosuroides, Apera spica-venti, and Melinus repens.
Specific examples of monocotyledonous harmful plants species particularly relevant in wheat crops on which the composition used according to the present invention act efficiently are Poa annua, Bromus rubens L., Bromus rigidus, Bromus secalinus L., Lolium sp., Avenafatua, Alopecurus myosuroides, Apera spica-venti, and Phalaris minor.
Examples of dicotyledonous harmful plants on which the composition used according to the present invention act efficiently are from amongst the genera Amaranthus spp., Polygonum spp., Medicago spp., Mollugo spp., Cyclospermum spp., Stellaria spp., Gnaphalium spp., Taraxacum spp., Oenothera spp., Amsinckia spp., Erodium spp., Erigeron spp., Senecio spp., Lamium spp., Kochia spp., Chenopodium spp., Lactuca spp., Malva spp., Ipomoea spp., Brassica spp., Sinapis spp., Urtica spp., Sida spp, Portulaca spp., Richardia spp., Ambrosia spp., Calandrinia spp., Sisymbrium spp., Sesbania spp., Capsella spp., Sonchus spp., Euphorbia spp., Helianthus spp., Coronopus spp., Salsola spp., Abutilon spp., Vicia spp., Epilobium spp., Cardamine spp., Picris spp., Trifolium spp., Galinsoga spp., Epimedium spp., Marchantia spp., Solanum spp., Oxalis spp., Metricaria spp., Plantago spp., Tribulus spp., Cenchrus spp. Bidens spp., Veronica spp., and Hypochaeris spp.
Particular examples of dicotyledonous harmful plants species on which the composition used according to the present invention act efficiently are selected from amongst the species Amaranthus spinosus, Amaranthus palmer, Amaranthis rudis, Polygonum convolvulus, Medicago polymorpha, Mollugo verticillata, Cyclospermum leptophyllum, Stellaria media, Gnaphalium purpureum, Taraxacum offi cinale, Oenothera laciniata, Amsinckia intermedia, Erodium cicutarium, Erodium moschatum, Erigeron bonariensis, Senecio vulgaris, Lamium sp., Erigeron canadensis, Polygonum aviculare, Kochia scoparia, Chenopodium album, Lactuca serriola, Malva parviflora, Malva neglecta, Ipomoea hederacea, Ipomoea lacunose, Brassica nigra, Sinapis arvensis, Urtica dioica, Amaranthus blitoides, Amaranthus retroflexus, Amaranthus hybridus, Amaranthus lividus, Sida spinosa, Portulaca oleracea, Richardia scabra, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Calandrinia caulescens, Sisymbrium rio, Sesbania exaltata, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Sonchus oleraceus, Euphorbia maculate, Helianthus annuus, Coronopus didymus, Salsola tragus, Abutilon theophrasti, Vicia benghalensis L., Epilobium paniculatum, Cardamine spp, Picris echioides, Trifolium spp., Galinsoga spp., Epimedium spp., Marchantia spp., Solanum spp., Oxalis spp., Matricaria chamomilla, Plantago spp., Tribulus terrestris, Salsola kali, Cenchrus spp., Bidens bipinnata, Veronica sp., Galium aparine L., Papaver rhoeas, Viola arvense, Centaurea cyanus and Hypochaeris radicata.
Particular examples of dicotyledonous harmful plants species particularly relevant in wheat crops on which the composition used according to the present invention act efficiently are Stellaria media, Senecio vulgaris, Lamium sp., Polygonum aviculare, Kochia scoparia, Chenopodium album, Brassica nigra, Sinapis arvensis, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Sonchus oleraceus, Matricaria chamomilla, Veronica sp., Galium aparine L., Papaver rhoeas, Viola arvense, and Centaurea cyanus.
The compositions used according to the present invention are easily and readily obtained, by combining the constituent (i), constituent (ii), and constituent (iii), preferably in the amounts and ratios by weight as defined in the context of the present invention, for example by mixing the appropriate amounts of constituent (i), constituent (ii), and constituent (iii).
Thus, in a further aspect, the present invention discloses a method for producing compositions used according to the present invention comprising the steps of
Constituent (i), constituent (ii), and constituent (iii) present in the compositions used in accordance with the present invention may be applied once, twice or three times per Gregorian calendar year, i.e. in one application, in two applications or in three applications per year according to the Gregorian calendar.
Furthermore, constituent (i), constituent (ii), and constituent (iii), as defined herein can be used together with formulation auxiliaries and additives customary in crop protection. Additives are, for example, fertilizers and colorants.
The compositions used in accordance with the present invention cannot only be used as mixed formulations which are then applied in the customary manner as a dilution with water, but also as so-called tank mixes by jointly diluting the separately formulated, or partially separately formulated, components with water.
Such a tank mix can for example be obtained by combining a formulation of (i) ethofumesate, for example comprising a total amount of (i) ethofumesate in the range of from 100 g/L to 600 g/L, a formulation of (ii) safener(s), for example comprising a total amount of (ii) safener(s) in the range of from 50 g/L to 600 g/L, and a formulation of (iii) bixlozone, for example comprising a total amount of (iii) bixlozone in the range of from 50 g/L to 600 g/L, and diluting same with the appropriate amount of water to obtain a ready-to-use application spray mixture.
The compositions used in accordance with the present invention can be formulated in various ways, depending on the prevailing biological and/or chemical-physical parameters. The following are examples of general possibilities for formulations: wettable powders (WP), water-soluble concentrates, emulsifiable concentrates (EC), aqueous solutions (SL), emulsions (EW) such as oil-in-water and water-in-oil emulsions, sprayable solutions or emulsions, suspension concentrates (SC), oil dispersions (OD), oil- or water-based dispersions, suspoemulsions, dusts (DP), seed-dressing materials, granules for soil application or for broadcasting, or water-dispersible granules (WG), ULV formulations, microcapsules (e.g. CS, ZC) or waxes.
The individual formulation types are known in principle and are described for example, in: Winnacker-Küchler, “Chemische Technologie”, Volume 7, C. Hauser Verlag Munich, 4th Edition, 1986; van Valkenburg, “Pesticide Formulations”, Marcel Dekker N.Y., 1973; K. Martens, “Spray Drying Handbook”, 3rd Ed. 1979, G. Goodwin Ltd. London.
The formulation auxiliaries required, such as inert materials, surfactants, solvents and other additives are also known and are described, for example, in Watkins, “Handbook of Insecticide Dust Diluents and Carriers”, 2nd Ed., Darland Books, Caldwell N.J.; H. v. Olphen, “Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry”; 2nd Ed., J. Wiley & Sons, N.Y. Marsden, “Solvents Guide”, 2nd Ed., Interscience, N.Y. 1950; McCutcheon's, “Detergents and Emulsifiers Annual”, MC Publ. Corp., Ridgewood N.J.; Sisley and Wood, “Encyclopedia of Surface Active Agents”, Chem. Publ. Co. Inc., N.Y. 1964; Schönfeldt, “Grenzflächenaktive Äthylenoxidaddukte” [Surface-active ethylene oxide adducts], Wiss. Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart 1976, Winnacker-Küchler, “Chemische Technologie”, Volume 7, C. Hauser Verlag Munich, 4th Edition 1986.
Wettable powders (sprayable powders) are products which are uniformly dispersible in water and which, besides the active compound, also comprise ionic or nonionic surfactants (wetters, dispersants), for example polyoxethylated alkylphenols, polyethoxylated fatty alcohols or fatty amines, alkanesulfonates or alkylbenzenesulfonates, sodium lignosulfonate, sodium 2,2′-dinaphthylmethane-6,6′-disulfonate, sodium dibutylnaphthalenesulfonate or else sodium oleoylmethyltauride, in addition to a diluent or inert material.
Emulsifiable concentrates are prepared by dissolving the active compound in an organic solvent, for example butanol, cyclohexanone, dimethylformamide, xylene or else higher-boiling aromatics or hydrocarbons with addition of one or more ionic or nonionic surfactants (emulsifiers). Examples of emulsifiers which may be used are: calcium salts of alkylarylsulfonic acids, such as calcium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, or nonionic emulsifiers such as fatty acid polyglycol esters, alkylaryl polyglycol ethers, fatty alcohol polyglycol ethers, propylene oxide/ethylene oxide condensates, alkyl polyethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters or polyoxethylene sorbitol esters.
Dusts are obtained by grinding the active compound with finely divided solid materials, for example talc, natural clays such as kaolin, bentonite and pyrophyllite, or diatomaceous earth.
Suspension concentrates (SC) can be water- or oil-based. They can be prepared, for example, by wet grinding by means of commercially available bead mills and, if appropriate, addition of further surfactants as they have already been mentioned for example above in the case of the other formulation types.
Emulsions, for example oil-in-water emulsions (EW), can be prepared for example by means of stirrers, colloid mills and/or static mixers using aqueous organic solvents and, if appropriate, further surfactants as have already been mentioned for example above in the case of the other formulation types.
Granules can be prepared either by spraying the active compound onto adsorptive, granulated inert material or by applying active compound concentrates to the surface of carriers such as sand, kaolinites or granulated inert material with the aid of binders, for example polyvinyl alcohol, sodium polyacrylate or else mineral oils. Suitable active compounds may also be granulated in the manner conventionally used for the production of fertilizer granules, if desired in a mixture with fertilizers. As a rule, water-dispersible granules are prepared by customary processes such as spray drying, fluidized-bed granulation, disk granulation, mixing with high-speed mixers and extrusion without solid inert material. Regarding the production of disk granules, fluidized-bed granules, extruder granules and spray granules, see, for example, the methods in “Spray-Drying Handbook” 3rd ed. 1979, G. Goodwin Ltd., London; J. E. Browning, “Agglomeration”, Chemical and Engineering 1967, page 147 et seq; “Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook”, 5th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York 1973, pp. 8-57.
As regards further details on the formulation of crop protection products, see, for example, G. C. Klingmam, “Weed Control as a Science”, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1961, pages 81-96 and J. D. Freyer, S. A. Evans, “Weed Control Handbook”, 5th Ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1968, pages 101-103.
As a rule, the agrochemical formulations comprise 1 to 95% by weight, of active compounds, the following concentrations being customary, depending on the type of formulation:
The active compound concentration in wettable powders is, for example, approximately 10 to 95% by weight, the remainder to 100% by weight being composed of customary formulation constituents. In the case of emulsifiable concentrates, the active compound concentration may amount to, for example, 5 to 80% by weight. Formulations in the form of dusts comprise, in most cases, 5 to 20% by weight of active compound, sprayable solutions approximately 0.2 to 25% by weight of active compound. In the case of granules such as dispersible granules, the active compound content depends partly on whether the active compound is present in liquid or solid form and on which granulation auxiliaries and fillers are being used. As a rule, the content amounts to between 10 and 90% by weight in the case of the water-dispersible granules.
In addition, the abovementioned active compound formulations may comprise, if appropriate, the conventional adhesives, wetters, dispersants, emulsifiers, preservatives, antifreeze agents, solvents, fillers, colorants, carriers, antifoams, evaporation inhibitors, pH regulators or viscosity regulators.
The herbicidal action of the herbicides present in compositions used according to the present invention can be improved, for example, by surfactants, preferably by wetters from the group of the fatty alcohol polyglycol ethers. The fatty alcohol polyglycol ethers preferable contain 10-18 carbon atoms in the fatty alcohol radical and 2-20 ethylene oxide units in the polyglycol ether moiety. The fatty alcohol polyglycol ethers can be nonionic or ionic, for example in the form of fatty alcohol polyglycol ethers sulfates, which can be used, for example, as alkali metal salts (e.g. sodium salts or potassium salts) or ammonium salts, but also as alkaline earth metal salts such as magnesium salts, such as sodium C12/C14-fatty alcohol diglycol ether sulfate (Genapol® LRO, Clariant); see, for example, EP-A-0476555, EP-A-0048436, EP-A-0336151 or U.S. Pat. No. 4,400,196 and also Proc. EWRS Symp. “Factors Affecting Herbicidal Activity and Selectivity”, 227-232 (1988). Nonionic fatty alcohol polyglycol ethers are, for example, (C10-C18)-, preferably (C10-C14)-fatty alkohol polyglycol ethers containing 2-20, preferably 3-15, ethylene oxide units (e.g. isotridecyl alcohol polyglycol ether), for example from the Genapol® series, such as Genapol® X-030, Genapol® X-060, Genapol® X-080 or Genapol® X-150 (all from Clariant GmbH).
The present invention furthermore embraces the use of combinations of constituent (i), constituent (ii), and constituent (iii), as defined in the context of the present invention with the wetting agents mentioned above from the group of the fatty alcohol polyglycolethers which preferably contain 10-18 carbon atoms in the fatty alcohol radical and 2-20 ethylene oxide units in the polyglycol ether moiety and which can be present in nonionic or ionic form (for example as fatty alcohol polyglycol ether sulfates). Preference is given to C12/C14-fatty alcohol diglycol ether sulfate sodium (Genapol® LRO, Clariant); and isotridecyl alcohol polyglycol ether with 3-15 ethylene oxide units, for example from the Genapol® X series, such as Genapol® X-030, Genapol® X-060, Genapol® X-080 or Genapol® X-150 (all from Clariant GmbH). It is furthermore known that fatty alcohol polyglycol ethers such as nonionic or ionic fatty alcohol polyglycol ethers (for example fatty alcohol polyglycol ether sulfates) are also suitable for use as penetrants and activity enhancers for a number of other herbicides, inter alia also for herbicides from the group of the imidazolinones (see, for example, EP-A-0502014).
The herbicidal effect of the compositions used according to the present invention can also be increased using vegetable oils. The term vegetable oils is to be understood as meaning oils from oil-plant species, such as soya oil, rapeseed oil, corn oil, sunflower oil, cottonseed oil, linseed oil, coconut oil, palm oil, safflower oil or castor oil, in particular rapeseed oil, and their transesterification products, for example alkyl esters, such as rapeseed oil methyl ester or rapeseed oil ethyl ester.
The vegetable oils are preferably esters of C10-C22—, preferably C12-C20-fatty acids. The C10-C22-fatty acid esters are, for example, esters of unsaturated or saturated C10-C22-fatty acids, in particular those with an even number of carbon atoms, for example erucic acid, lauric acid, palmitic acid and, in particular, Cis-fatty acids such as stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid or linolenic acid.
Preferred C1-C20-alkyl-C10-C22-fatty acid esters are the methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, 2-ethylhexyl and dodecyl esters. Preferred glycol- and glycerol-C10-C22-fatty acid esters are the uniform or mixed glycol esters and glycerol esters of C10-C22-fatty acids, in particular those fatty acids which have an even number of carbon atoms, for example erucic acid, lauric acid, palmitic acid and, in particular, Cis-fatty acids such as stearic acid, oleic acid, linolic acid or linolenic acid.
The vegetable oils can be present in the herbicidal compositions used according to the present invention for example in the form of commercially available oil-containing formulation additives, in particular those based on rapeseed oil such as Hasten® (Victorian Chemical Company, Australia, hereinbelow termed Hasten, main constituent: rapeseed oil ethyl ester), Actirob®B (Novance, France, hereinbelow termed ActirobB, main constituent: rapeseed oil methyl ester), Rako-Binol® (Bayer AG, Germany, termed Rako-Binol hereinbelow, main constituent: rapeseed oil), Renol® (Stefes, Germany, termed Renol hereinbelow, vegetable oil constituent: rapeseed oil methyl ester), or Stefes Mero® (Stefes, Germany, hereinbelow termed Mero, main constituent: rapeseed oil methyl ester).
For use, formulations comprising constituent (i), constituent (ii), and constituent (iii) present in the compositions used in accordance with the present invention are optionally diluted in the customary manner, for example using water in the case of wettable powders, emulsifiable concentrates, dispersions and water-dispersible granules. Preparations in the form of dusts, soil granules, granules for broadcasting and sprayable solutions are usually not diluted further with other inert substances prior to use.
The compositions as defined in the context of the present invention are preferably applied to the harmful plants or undesired plants or parts thereof, seeds of the plants or the area under cultivation (soil of a field), preferably to the green of the harmful plants or parts thereof, or to the green parts of the undesired plants or parts thereof.
A composition used in accordance with the present invention comprising constituent (i), constituent (ii), and constituent (iii) has the advantage of being easier to apply since the quantities of the components are already presented in the correct ratio to each other. Moreover, the adjuvants in the formulation can be matched optimally to each other.
As already described in more detail above, the present invention further relates to the use of compositions comprising constituent (i), constituent (ii), and constituent (iii) according to the present invention (preferably in one of the preferred embodiments defined herein) in the field of agriculture, in particular as plant growth regulators and/or for controlling harmful plants or undesired plant growth.
In a further aspect of the present invention therefore relates to the use of a composition according to the present invention for the protection of wheat crop plants, wherein preferably said composition is applied post emergence to the wheat crop plants.
The present invention also relates to a method for controlling undesired vegetation characterized in that a composition as defined in the context of the present invention is applied to the undesired vegetation or to the area on which the wheat crop plants are growing or will be growing.
The uses or methods of the present invention are preferably characterized in that said composition is applied to the wheat crop plants post emergence before BBCH growth stage 13, preferably at BBCH growth stages 09, 10, 11 and/or 12, of the wheat crop plants, more preferably at BBCH growth stages 10, 11 and/or 12 of the wheat crop plants, particularly at BBCH growth stage 10, 11 or 12 of the wheat crop plants.
In the context of the present invention application rates are indicated in g/ha (i.e. grams of active ingredient per hectare).
The uses or methods of the present invention are preferably characterized in that a composition as defined in the context of the present invention is applied to the wheat crop plants (preferably post emergence, preferably before BBCH growth stage 13) such that
The uses or methods of the present invention are preferably characterized in that a composition as defined in the context of the present invention is applied to the wheat crop plants (preferably post emergence, preferably before BBCH growth stage 13) such that
The uses or methods of the present invention are preferably characterized in that a composition as defined in the context of the present invention is applied to the wheat crop plants (preferably post emergence, preferably before BBCH growth stage 13) such that
The uses or methods of the present invention are preferably characterized in that a composition as defined in the context of the present invention is applied to the wheat crop plants (preferably post emergence, preferably before BBCH growth stage 13) such that
The uses or methods of the present invention are preferably characterized in that a composition as defined in the context of the present invention is applied to the wheat crop plants (preferably post emergence, preferably before BBCH growth stage 13) such that
The uses or methods of the present invention are preferably characterized in that a composition as defined in the context of the present invention is applied to the wheat crop plants (preferably post emergence, preferably before BBCH growth stage 13) such that
Said uses or methods are preferably characterized in that the wheat crop plants are selected from the group consisting of Triticum durum and Triticum aestivum, in particular Triticum aestivum.
In a further aspect, the present invention relates to the use of mefenpyr-diethyl or cloquintocet-mexyl as safener for ethofumesate and bixlozone in wheat crop plants.
In field trials the interaction of (i) ethofumesate, (ii) the safener mefenpyr-diethyl and (iii) bixlozone concerning wheat crop injury was investigated.
Plots of five different varieties of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) crops in the field were sprayed with an application volume of 100 L/ha to 300 L/ha with a hand held spray boom.
Application of the application spray compostions was carried out early in each case post-emergence at BBCH growth stage 10 (first leaf through coleoptile), BBCH growth stage 11 (first leaf unfolded) or BBCH growth stage 12 (two leafs unfolded) of the respective wheat crop plants.
The crop damage was in each case visually rated on a percentage scale in relation to the untreated control (100%=all plants dead, complete crop kill; 50%=green plant biomass reduced by 50%, and 0%=like control plot, no crop injury).
The main symptoms of wheat crop damage observed were bleaching, thinning and stunting.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
21189245.0 | Aug 2021 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2022/071265 | 7/28/2022 | WO |