Use of feedstock in carbon black plasma process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10100200
  • Patent Number
    10,100,200
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 7, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 16, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A method of making carbon black. A method of making carbon black is described including combusting feedstock with plasma in an apparatus having a series of unit operations with individual capacities. The individual capacities of the unit operations are substantially balanced by replacing at least part of the feedstock with a feedstock having a molecular weight heavier than methane. This results, among other things, in increased utilization of the individual capacities of the unit operations and increased overall throughput.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The field of art to which this invention generally pertains is methods for making use of electrical energy to effect chemical changes.


BACKGROUND

No matter how unique the product or process is, over time, all manufacturing processes look for ways to become more efficient and more effective. This can take the form of raw material costs, energy costs, or simple improvements in process efficiencies, among other things. In general, raw material costs and energy resources, which are a substantial part of the cost of most if not all manufacturing processes, tend to actually increase over time, because of scale up and increased volumes if for no other reasons. For these, and other reasons, there is a constant search in this area for ways to not only improve the processes and products being produced, but to produce them in more efficient and effective ways as well.


The systems described herein meet the challenges described above while accomplishing additional advances as well.


BRIEF SUMMARY

A method of making carbon black is described including cracking feedstock with plasma in an apparatus having a series of unit operations with individual capacities, wherein the individual capacities of the unit operations are substantially balanced by replacing at least part of the feedstock with a feedstock having a molecular weight heavier than methane, resulting in increased utilization of the individual capacities of the unit operations and increased overall throughput.


Additional embodiments include: the method described above the heavier feedstock is at least one gas; the method described above where the heavier feedstock contains a carbon content higher than methane; the method described above where up to 100% of the feedstock is replaced with the heavier feedstock; the method described above where the unit operations include at least one reactor unit, and/or at least one heat exchanger unit, and/or at least one filter unit; the method described above where the unit operations include at least one dryer unit; the method described above where the unit operations include at least one pelletizer unit; the method described above where the heavier feedstock is one or more of ethane, propane, butane, acetylene, ethylene, butane, carbon black oil, coal tar, crude coal tar, diesel oil, benzene, and methyl naphthalene; the method described above where the heavier feedstock contains one or more additional polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.


These and additional embodiments, will be apparent from the following descriptions.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The FIGURE shows a schematic representation of one typical system as described herein.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The particulars shown herein are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the various embodiments of the present invention only and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.


The present invention will now be described by reference to more detailed embodiments. This invention may, however, be embodied in different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the description of the invention and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety.


Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should be construed in light of the number of significant digits and ordinary rounding approaches.


Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. Every numerical range given throughout this specification will include every narrower numerical range that falls within such broader numerical range, as if such narrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein.


Additional advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.


As described herein, the use of ethane or heavier feedstock gases to reduce costs and balance reactor capacity in a plasma reactor is described. Ethane and/or other heavier than methane hydrocarbons can be used in place of part or all of the methane as the process' feedstock. The use of feedstock heavier than methane in the plasma process reduces the required energy per unit of production. Use of heavier feedstocks can therefore result in lower raw material costs and higher energy efficiencies. However, by replacing a portion or all of the methane/natural gas as feedstock with the heavier feedstock, if done properly this also can allow for better (or ideally full) utilization of the front and back end individual unit capacities and so reduce overall costs or increase profitability, even when the heavier feedstock costs more than the lighter feedstock, by spreading fixed costs over a higher amount of product produced per unit of time, or simply by generating additional product to sell. Use of heavier feedstocks may also improve product quality (lower grit and/or extract from forming product faster, higher structure/CDBP (crushed dibutyl phthlate number) or DBP (dibutyl phthlate number), higher surface area).


The use of ethane to substitute a portion of the methane in a way to increase, e.g., conventional reactor and/or heat exchanger and/or filter capacity so that it matches the available downstream capacity, e.g., conventional heat exchanger/product cooler, filter, pelletisation and/or dryer capacity (often the dryer being the limit to production) can be extremely advantageous. For example, this balancing of capacity can result in higher profitability from increased sales on reactor or heat exchanger or filter limited grades even when the raw material cost, or even the total cost, of the product increases due to the potentially higher cost of ethane or heavier feedstocks. As described herein, the use of the heavier feedstock enriches the feedstock used and so increases the utilization of the back end of the plasma unit, which can result in enabling higher sales and profitability, or just to satisfy customer demands for additional more expensive to make product.


While heavier does refer to relative molecular weights, i.e., grams per mole (gm/mol), it is the carbon content of the feedstock (% carbon by weight) that best represents the potential for improvement, with the increasing presence of unsaturated bonds within the feedstock that can also have a positive effect on the process, for example, the use of ethylene in place of or in addition to ethane. It should also be noted that while the gas form of the feedstock is typically used, while it can be more expensive, liquid forms of the feedstocks described herein can also be employed.


If the hydrocarbon feedstock is represented by the chemical formula CnH(2n+2), the results described herein can improve with increase in “n”. However, with unsaturated and/or cyclical compounds, the +2 actually changes to a smaller or negative number, for example, carbon black feedstock in a furnace process is typically CnHn, and coal tar actually CnHn/2.


The use of the heavier feedstocks as described herein results in the ability to balance or match the capacities of each unit of operation. Production from the full set of equipment is restricted to the lowest individual unit capacity step, with those capacity limits often determined by such things as the grade of production and the feedstock used. Often reactor limits match filter limits, but heat exchanger limits can represent a different limit for the process. For example, furnace processes typically couples the reactor and heat exchanger limits. There is also typically a given evaporation rate in the dyer. Changing the dryer is expensive, and so it typically represents the limit of the unit, but not always. Thus using the full dryer capacity all the time by using heavier feedstocks when the reactor, heat exchanger, filter or other unit operation that benefits from heavier feedstocks is unable to provide enough product when using methane or light feedstocks to use all of the dryer capacity can increase a production train's profitability.


The amount of methane replaced can be meaningful at any level, e.g., even as little as 1% by weight or volume, 2%, 3%, etc. up to 100%. And once 100% of the methane is replaced with ethane, for example, additional capacity benefits can be achieved by replacing the ethane with a heavier feedstock such as propane, for example, and so forth, on up to heavier and higher molecular weight gases and liquids.


While relative cost is of course a consideration which needs to be factored into the selection, in addition to ethane, any additional gases or liquids which are operable in conventional carbon black producing processes may be selected, including, for example, propane, butane, acetylene, ethylene, butane, carbon black oil, coal tar, crude coal tar, diesel oil, benzene, methyl naphthalene, etc.


EXAMPLE 1

While useful with any conventional unit operation containing carbon black generating systems typically used to generate carbon black products, one system is shown schematically in the FIGURE, including a plasma generator (10) generates plasma to which the feedstock gas (11) (typically methane) is added. The mixed gases enter into a reactor (12) where the carbon black is generated followed by a heat exchanger (13). The carbon black is then filtered (14), pelletized in a pelletizer (15) and dried in a dryer (16). By replacing the methane gas with ethane gas, as stated above, the heavier feedstock enriches the feedstock used and increases the production rate of a reactor, heat exchanger and/or filter limited grade so that it more fully utilizes the capacity of downstream equipment, potentially enabling higher sales and profitability. Other conventional unit operations may exist, for example, between the filter and pelletizer units shown, or elsewhere as desired or appropriate. They may include hydrogen/tail gas removal units, conveying units, process filter units, classification units, grit reduction mill units, purge filter units (filters black out of steam vented from dryer, for example), dust filter units (collects dust from other equipment, for example), off quality product blending units, etc., as may be typically found in carbon black production systems. And of course, these unit operations could and be subjected to the balancing and enhanced utilization as described herein as well. As further demonstrated in the Table 1 below, for the same power (kilowatts=kW), a carbon black production unit would typically make the same amount of N326 as N330 grade carbon black (CB). However, N330 has a higher OAN (oil absorption number) and so needs more water per kilogram produced to pelletize, which would also dictate the need for a larger dryer. If a unit had such a larger dryer, then using ethane to make N326 would increase the production rate to 168 kilograms(kg)/hour(hr) and still leave some dryer capacity unutilized. Similarly, for the filter, using ethane reduces the required filter size. The replacement of methane with ethane could reduce the required filter area, e.g., should some of the filter capacity get damaged, or a difficult-to-filter grade be manufactured on the same unit.













TABLE 1*





Feedstock
Methane
Methane
Ethane
Ethane




















Grade

N326
N330
N326
N330


OAN

72
102
72
102


Torch Power
kW
750
750
750
750


Reactor Temp
° C.
1400
1400
1400
1400


CB Production
kg/hr
128
128
168
168


Filtration Rate
Nm3/hr
1353
1353
1423
1423


Sp. Filter Rate
Nm3/kg
11
11
8
8


Dryer Evap.
kgH2O/hr
101
143
133
189





*C = centigrade; Temp = temperature; Sp. = specific; Evap. = evaporation; Nm3 = normal meter, i.e., cubic meter of gas at normal conditions, i.e. 0° C., and 1 atmosphere of pressure.






EXAMPLE 2

A unit fully utilized making N330 also needs to make N234. This grade requires more energy per kilo of black, but does not have a sufficiently large power supply. By adding ethane the unit can make more N234, and so satisfy customer demands that the equipment could not when using Methane.













TABLE 2





Feedstock
Methane
Methane
Ethane
Ethane




















Grade

N234
N330
N234
N330


OAN

125
102
125
102


Torch Power
kW
750
750
750
750


Reactor Temp
° C.
1925
1400
1925
1400


CB Production
kg/hr
85
128
110
168


Filtration Rate
Nm3/hr
1513
1353
1552
1423


Sp. Filter Rate
Nm3/kg
19
11
14.5
8


Dryer Evap.
kgH2O/hr
117
143
151
189









Thus, the scope of the invention shall include all modifications and variations that may fall within the scope of the attached claims. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making carbon black, comprising: cracking a first feedstock with plasma; andincreasing overall throughput of a given grade of the carbon black by replacing at least part of the first feedstock with a second feedstock and cracking the second feedstock with the plasma, wherein increasing the overall throughput further comprises cracking a mixture of the first feedstock, and the second feedstock with the plasma.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second feedstock is heavier than the first feedstock.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising cracking the first feedstock and the second feedstock in an apparatus comprising at least one reactor unit, at least one heat exchanger unit, at least one filter unit, at least one hydrogen gas removal unit, at least one pelletizer unit and at least one dryer unit.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first feedstock and the second feedstock is a gas.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein each of the first feedstock and the second feedstock is a gas.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the second feedstock comprises one or more aromatic hydrocarbons.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the second feedstock comprises one or more polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the second feedstock comprises one or more of ethane, propane, butane, acetylene, ethylene, butane, carbon black oil, coal tar, crude coal tar, diesel oil, benzene and methyl naphthalene.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the second feedstock is heavier relative to methane.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the second feedstock has a greater carbon content than the first feedstock.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the second feedstock has a % carbon by weight greater than the first feedstock.
  • 12. A method of making carbon black, comprising: cracking a first feedstock with plasma; andincreasing overall throughput of a given grade of the carbon black by replacing, at least part of the first feedstock with a second feedstock and cracking the second feedstock with the plasma, further comprising replacing at least part of the first feedstock with the second feedstock during cracking of the first feedstock.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the second feedstock comprises one or more of ethane, propane, butane, acetylene, ethylene, butane, carbon black oil, coal tar, crude coal tar, diesel oil, benzene and methyl naphthalene.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the second feedstock comprises one or more aromatic hydrocarbons.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the second feedstock comprises one or more polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, wherein the second feedstock is heavier than the first feedstock.
  • 17. The method of claim 12, further comprising cracking the first feedstock and the second feedstock in an apparatus comprising at least one reactor unit, at least one heat exchanger unit, at least one filter unit, at least one hydrogen gas removal unit, at least one pelletizer unit and at least one dryer unit.
  • 18. The method of claim 12, wherein at least one of the first feedstock and the second feedstock is a gas.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein each of the first feedstock and the second feedstock is a gas.
  • 20. The method of claim 12, wherein the second feedstock is heavier relative to methane.
  • 21. The method of claim 12, wherein the second feedstock has a greater carbon content than the first feedstock.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the second feedstock has a % carbon by weight greater than the first feedstock.
  • 23. A method of making carbon black, comprising: cracking a first feedstock with plasma; andincreasing overall throughput of a given grade of the carbon black by replacing at least part of the first feedstock with a second feedstock and cracking the second feedstock with the plasma, wherein at least one of the first feedstock and the second feedstock comprises a feedstock mixture.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein each of the first feedstock and the second feedstock comprises a feedstock mixture.
  • 25. The method of claim 23, wherein the second feedstock comprises one or more of ethane, propane, butane, acetylene, ethylene, butane, carbon black oil, coal tar, crude coal tar, diesel oil, benzene and methyl naphthalene.
  • 26. The method of claim 23, wherein the second feedstock comprises one or more aromatic hydrocarbons.
  • 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the second feedstock comprises one or more polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
  • 28. The method of claim 23, wherein the second feedstock is heavier than the first feedstock.
  • 29. The method of claim 23, further comprising cracking the first feedstock and/or the second feedstock in an apparatus comprising at least one reactor unit, at least one heat exchanger unit, at least one filter unit, at least one hydrogen gas removal unit, at least one pelletizer unit and at least one dryer unit.
  • 30. The method of claim 23, wherein at least one of the first feedstock and the second feedstock is a gas.
  • 31. The method of claim 30, wherein each of the first feedstock and the second feedstock is a gas.
  • 32. The method of claim 23, wherein the second feedstock is heavier relative to methane.
  • 33. The method of claim. 23, wherein the second feedstock has a greater carbon content than the first feedstock.
  • 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the second feedstock has a % carbon by weight greater than the first feedstock.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/933,488 filed Jan. 30, 2014, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (191)
Number Name Date Kind
1339225 Rose May 1920 A
1536612 Lewis May 1925 A
1597277 Jakowsky Aug 1926 A
2062358 Frolich Sep 1932 A
2002003 Eisenhut et al. May 1935 A
2393106 Johnson et al. Jan 1946 A
2557143 Royster Jun 1951 A
2572851 Jordan et al. Oct 1951 A
2616842 Sheer et al. Nov 1952 A
2785964 Pollock Mar 1957 A
2850403 Day Sep 1958 A
2951143 Anderson et al. Aug 1960 A
3009783 Sheer et al. Nov 1961 A
3073769 Doukas Jan 1963 A
3288696 Orbach Nov 1966 A
3307923 Ruble Mar 1967 A
3308164 Shepard Mar 1967 A
3309780 Goins Mar 1967 A
3331664 Jordan Jul 1967 A
3344051 Latham, Jr. Sep 1967 A
3408164 Johnson Oct 1968 A
3409403 Bjornson et al. Nov 1968 A
3420632 Ryan Jan 1969 A
3431074 Jordan Mar 1969 A
3619140 Morgan et al. Nov 1971 A
3637974 Tajbl et al. Jan 1972 A
3673375 Camacho Jun 1972 A
3725103 Jordan et al. Apr 1973 A
3922335 Jordan et al. Nov 1975 A
3981654 Rood et al. Sep 1976 A
3981659 Myers Sep 1976 A
3984743 Horie Oct 1976 A
4028072 Braun et al. Jun 1977 A
4035336 Jordan et al. Jul 1977 A
4057396 Matovich Nov 1977 A
4075160 Mills et al. Feb 1978 A
4101639 Surovikin et al. Jul 1978 A
4199545 Matovich Apr 1980 A
4282199 Lamond et al. Aug 1981 A
4289949 Raaness et al. Sep 1981 A
4317001 Silver et al. Feb 1982 A
4372937 Johnson Feb 1983 A
4404178 Johnson et al. Sep 1983 A
4452771 Hunt Jun 1984 A
4431624 Casperson Aug 1984 A
4472172 Sheer et al. Sep 1984 A
4553981 Fuderer Nov 1985 A
4601887 Dorn et al. Jul 1986 A
4678888 Camacho et al. Jul 1987 A
4689199 Eckert et al. Aug 1987 A
4765964 Gravley et al. Aug 1988 A
4787320 Raaness et al. Nov 1988 A
4864096 Wolf et al. Sep 1989 A
4977305 Severance, Jr. Dec 1990 A
5039312 Hollis, Jr. et al. Aug 1991 A
5045667 Iceland et al. Sep 1991 A
5046145 Drouet Sep 1991 A
5105123 Ballou Apr 1992 A
5147998 Tsantrizos et al. Sep 1992 A
5206880 Olsson Apr 1993 A
5399957 Vierboom et al. Mar 1995 A
5481080 Lynum et al. Jan 1996 A
5486674 Lynum et al. Jan 1996 A
5500501 Lynum et al. Mar 1996 A
5527518 Lynum et al. Jun 1996 A
5593644 Norman et al. Jan 1997 A
5604424 Shuttleworth Feb 1997 A
5611947 Vavruska Mar 1997 A
5717293 Sellers Feb 1998 A
5725616 Lynum et al. Mar 1998 A
5935293 Detering et al. Aug 1999 A
5951960 Lynum et al. Sep 1999 A
5989512 Lynum et al. Nov 1999 A
5997837 Lynum et al. Dec 1999 A
6068827 Lynum et al. May 2000 A
6099696 Schwob et al. Aug 2000 A
6188187 Harlan Feb 2001 B1
6197274 Mahmud et al. Mar 2001 B1
6358375 Schwob Mar 2002 B1
6380507 Childs Apr 2002 B1
6395197 Detering et al. May 2002 B1
6444727 Yamada et al. Sep 2002 B1
6602920 Hall et al. Aug 2003 B2
6703580 Brunet et al. Mar 2004 B2
6773689 Lynum et al. Aug 2004 B1
7167240 Stagg Jan 2007 B2
7452514 Fabry et al. Nov 2008 B2
7462343 Lynum et al. Dec 2008 B2
7563525 Ennis Jul 2009 B2
7655209 Rumpf et al. Feb 2010 B2
8147765 Muradov et al. Apr 2012 B2
8221689 Boutot et al. Jul 2012 B2
8257452 Menzel Sep 2012 B2
8277739 Monsen et al. Oct 2012 B2
8323793 Hamby Dec 2012 B2
8443741 Chapman et al. May 2013 B2
8471170 Li et al. Jun 2013 B2
8486364 Vanier et al. Jul 2013 B2
8501148 Belmont et al. Aug 2013 B2
8581147 Kooken et al. Nov 2013 B2
8771386 Licht et al. Jul 2014 B2
8784617 Novoselov et al. Jul 2014 B2
8850826 Ennis Oct 2014 B2
8871173 Nester et al. Oct 2014 B2
8911596 Vancina Dec 2014 B2
9445488 Foret Sep 2016 B2
9574086 Johnson et al. Feb 2017 B2
20010029888 Sindarrajan et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010039797 Cheng Nov 2001 A1
20020000085 Hall et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020050323 Moisan et al. May 2002 A1
20020157559 Brunet et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030152184 Shehane et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040047779 Denison Mar 2004 A1
20040071626 Smith et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081862 Herman Apr 2004 A1
20040148860 Fletcher Aug 2004 A1
20040168904 Anazawa et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040211760 Delzenne et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040247509 Newby Dec 2004 A1
20050063892 Tandon et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050230240 Dubrovsky et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060034748 Lewis et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060037244 Clawson Feb 2006 A1
20060107789 Deegan et al. May 2006 A1
20060226538 Kawata Oct 2006 A1
20060239890 Chang et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070140004 Marotta et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070183959 Charlier et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070270511 Melnichuk et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080041829 Blutke et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080121624 Belashchenko et al. May 2008 A1
20080169183 Hertel et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080182298 Day Jul 2008 A1
20080226538 Rumpf et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080279749 Probst et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090090282 Gold et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090142250 Fabry et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155157 Stenger et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090208751 Green et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090230098 Salsich et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100249353 MacIntosh et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110036014 Tsangaris et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110071962 Lim Mar 2011 A1
20110076608 Bergemann et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110138766 Elkady et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110155703 Winn Jun 2011 A1
20110239542 Liu et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120018402 Carducci et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120025693 Wang et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120201266 Boulos et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120232173 Juranitch et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120292794 Prabhu et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130039841 Nester et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130062195 Samaranayake et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130062196 Sin Mar 2013 A1
20130092525 Li et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130194840 Huselstein et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130292363 Hwang et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130323614 Chapman et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130340651 Wampler et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140057166 Yokoyama et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140131324 Shipulski et al. May 2014 A1
20140190179 Barker et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140224706 Do et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140227165 Hung et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140248442 Luizi et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140290532 Rodriguez et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140294716 Susekov et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140357092 Singh Dec 2014 A1
20140373752 Hassinen et al. Dec 2014 A2
20150044516 Kyrlidis et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150064099 Nester et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150180346 Yuzurihara et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150210856 Johnson et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150210857 Johnson et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150210858 Hoermann et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150211378 Johnson et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150218383 Johnson et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150223314 Hoermann et al. Aug 2015 A1
20160030856 Kaplan et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160210856 Assenbaum et al. Jul 2016 A1
20170034898 Moss et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170037253 Hardman et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170058128 Johnson et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170066923 Hardman et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170073522 Hardman et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170349758 Johnson Dec 2017 A1
20180015438 Taylor et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180016441 Taylor et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180022925 Hardman et al. Jan 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (65)
Number Date Country
2897071 May 1971 AU
830378 Dec 1969 CA
964405 Mar 1975 CA
2 353 752 Jan 2003 CA
2 621 749 Aug 2009 CA
1644650 Jul 2005 CN
102108216 Jun 2011 CN
102993788 Mar 2013 CN
103160149 Jun 2013 CN
203269847 Nov 2013 CN
198 07 224 Aug 1999 DE
200300389 Dec 2003 EA
0 616 600 Sep 1994 EP
0 635 044 Feb 1996 EP
0 635 043 Jun 1996 EP
0 861 300 Sep 1998 EP
1188801 Mar 2002 EP
2 891 434 Mar 2007 FR
2 937 029 Apr 2010 FR
395893 Jul 1933 GB
987498 Mar 1965 GB
1 400 266 Jul 1975 GB
1 492 346 Nov 1977 GB
6-322615 Nov 1994 JP
2004-300334 Oct 2004 JP
2005-243410 Sep 2005 JP
10-2008-105344 Dec 2008 KR
2014-0075261 Jun 2014 KR
2425795 Aug 2011 RU
2488984 Jul 2013 RU
2015116798 Aug 2015 TG
9312031 Jun 1993 WO
9318094 Sep 1993 WO
9320153 Oct 1993 WO
9323331 Nov 1993 WO
1994008747 Apr 1994 WO
9703133 Jan 1997 WO
03014018 Feb 2003 WO
2012015313 Feb 2012 WO
2012067546 May 2012 WO
2012094743 Jul 2012 WO
2012149170 Nov 2012 WO
2013134093 Sep 2013 WO
2013184074 Dec 2013 WO
2013185219 Dec 2013 WO
2014000108 Jan 2014 WO
2014012169 Jan 2014 WO
2015049008 Apr 2015 WO
2015116797 Aug 2015 WO
2015116800 Aug 2015 WO
2015116807 Aug 2015 WO
2015116811 Aug 2015 WO
2015116943 Aug 2015 WO
2016012367 Jan 2016 WO
2016126598 Aug 2016 WO
2016126599 Aug 2016 WO
2016126600 Aug 2016 WO
2016014641 Aug 2016 WO
2017019683 Feb 2017 WO
2017027385 Feb 2017 WO
2017034980 Mar 2017 WO
2017044594 Mar 2017 WO
2017048621 Mar 2017 WO
2017190015 Nov 2017 WO
2017190045 Nov 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (80)
Entry
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2015/013482, dated Jun. 17, 2015.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2015/013505, dated May 11, 2015.
Isr and Written Opinion from PCT/US2015/013794, dated Jun. 19, 2015.
Donnet, Basal and Wang, “Carbon Black”, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993 pp. 46, 47 and 54.
Boehm, HP, “Some Aspects of Surface Chemistry of Carbon Blacks and Other Carbons”, Carbon 1994, p. 759.
“The Science and Technology of Rubber” (Mark, Erman, and Roland, Fourth Edition, Academic Press, 2013).
“Carbon Black Elastomer Interaction” Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 1991, pp. 19-39.
“The Impact of a Fullerene-Like Concept in Carbon Black Science”, Carbon, 2002, pp. 157-162.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2015/013510, dated Apr. 22, 2015.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2016/015939, dated Jun. 3, 2016.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2016/015941, dated Apr. 21, 2016.
Isr and Written Opinion from PCT/US2016/015942, dated Apr. 11, 2016.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2016/044039, dated Oct. 6, 2016.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2016/045793, dated Oct. 18, 2016.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2016/050728, dated Nov. 18, 2016.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2016/051261, dated Nov. 18, 2016.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2015/013484, dated Apr. 22, 2015.
AP 42, Fifth Edition, vol. I, Chapter 6: Organic Chemical Process Industry, Section 6.1: Carbon Black.
Fulcheri, et al. “Plasma processing: a step towards the production of new grades of carbon black.” Carbon 40.2 (2002): 169-176.
Grivei, et al. “A clean process for carbon nanoparticles and hydrogen production from plasma hydrocarbon cracking” Publishable Report, European Commission JOULE III Programme, Project No. JOE3-CT97-0057, circa 2000.
Fabry, et al. “Carbon black processing by thermal plasma. Analysis of the particle formation mechanism.” Chemical Engineering Science 56.6 (2001): 2123-2132.
Pristavita, et al. “Carbon nanoparticle production by inductively coupled thermal plasmas: controlling the thermal history of particle nucleation.” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing 31.6 (2011): 851-866.
Cho, et al. “Conversion of natural gas to hydrogen and carbon black by plasma and application of plasma black.” Symposia—American Chemical Society, Div. Fuel Chem. vol. 49. 2004.
Pristavita, et al. “Carbon blacks produced by thermal plasma: the influence of the reactor geometry on the product morphology.” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing 30.2 (2010): 267-279.
Pristavita, et al. “Volatile Compounds Present in Carbon Blacks Produced by Thermal Plasmas.” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing 31.6 (2011): 839-850.
Garberg, et al. “A transmission electron microscope and electron diffraction study of carbon nanodisks.” Carbon 46.12 (2008): 1535-1543.
Knaapila, et al. “Directed assembly of carbon nanocones into wires with an epoxy coating in thin films by a combination of electric field alignment and subsequent pyrolysis.” Carbon 49.10 (2011): 3171-3178.
Krishnan, et al. “Graphitic cones and the nucleation of curved carbon surfaces.” Nature 388.6641 (1997): 451-454.
Høyer, et al. “Microelectromechanical strain and pressure sensors based on electric field aligned carbon cone and carbon black particles in a silicone elastomer matrix.” Journal of Applied Physics 112.9 (2012): 094324.
Naess, Stine Nalum, et al. “Carbon nanocones: wall structure and morphology.” Science and Technology of advanced materials (2009), 7 pages.
Fulcheri, et al. “From methane to hydrogen, carbon black and water.” International journal of hydrogen energy 20.3 (1995): 197-202.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2016/047769, dated Dec. 30, 2016.
D.L. Sun, F. Wang, R.Y. Hong, C.R. Xie, Preparation of carbon black via arc discharge plasma enhanced by thermal pyrolysis, Diamond & Related Materials (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2015.11.004, 47 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,541.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 2, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,299.
Ex Parte Quayke Action dated May 19, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,761.
Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 15 742 910.1 dated Jul. 18, 2017.
Search report in counterpart European Application No. 15 74 3214 dated Sep. 12, 2017.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/030139, dated Jul. 19, 2017.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/030179, dated Jul. 27, 2017.
A.I. Media et al., “Tinting Strength of Carbon Black,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 40, No. 2, Aug. 1972.
Reese, J. (2017). “Resurgence in American manufacturing will be led by the rubber and tire industry.” Rubber World. 255. 18-21 and 23.
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,476.
Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 15743214.7 dated Jan. 16, 2018.
Chiesa P, Lozza G, Mazzocchi L. Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine Fuel. ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2005;127(1):73-80. doi:10.1115/1.1787513.
Tsujikawa, Y., and T. Sawada. “Analysis of a gas turbine and steam turbine combined cycle with liquefied hydrogen as fuel.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 7.6 (1982): 499-505.
Search report from RU2016135213, dated Feb. 12, 2018.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,528.
Bakken, Jon Arne, et al. “Thermal plasma process development in Norway.” Pure and applied Chemistry 70.6 (1998): 1223-1228.
Polman, E. A., J. C. De Laat, and M. Crowther. “Reduction of CO2 emissions by adding hydrogen to natural gas.” IEA Green House Gas R&D programme (2003).
Verfondern, K., “Nuclear Energy for Hydrogen Production”, Schriften des Forschungzentrum Julich, vol. 58, 2007.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Guide to Industrial Assessments for Pollution Prevention and Energy Efficiency,” EPA 625/R-99/003, 1999.
Breeze, P. “Raising steam plant efficiency—Pushing the steam cycle boundaries.” PEI Magazine 20.4 (2012).
Final Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,476.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,541.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 18, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,761.
Correced Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,761.
Final Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,088.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/259.884.
Russian Official Notification of application No. 2016135213 from Russia dated Feb. 12, 2018.
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,476.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2016 in in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,476.
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,541.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,541.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,761.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,761.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,793.
Final Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,793.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 7, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,793.
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,088.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,088.
Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 16747055.8 dated Jun. 27, 2018.
Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 16747056.6 dated Jun. 27, 2018.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Jun. 18, 2018 in PCT/US2018/028619.
ISR and Written Opinion from PCT/US2018/028619, dated Aug. 9, 2018.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/262,539.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,476.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/410,283.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 19, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,761.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/241,771.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150210857 A1 Jul 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61933488 Jan 2014 US