Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Conventional wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) transmitter arrays may employ semiconductor lasers as optical transmitters. The performance of WDM systems depends on the signal integrity from the laser sources, which may fluctuate due to variations in the environment (e.g., temperature, etc.) and/or conditions of the laser (e.g., age, quality control in the manufacturing process). A general dichotomy exists between Coarse WDM (CWDM) networks and Dense WDM (DWDM) networks, in that CWDM networks may comprise a relatively wide channel spacing (e.g., about 20 nanometers (nm) or about 2500 Gigahertz (GHz), while dense WDM (DWDM) networks may comprise a relatively narrow channel spacing (e.g., about 0.8 nm or about 100 GHz). Accordingly, CWDM networks may comprise substantially fewer channels (e.g., up to about 18 channels) than DWDM networks (e.g., up to about 128 channels). Typical CWDM networks and DWDM networks may be described in International Telecommunications Union (ITU) Standardization Section (ITU-T) publication G.984.2 and ITU-T G984.1 (respectively), both of which are incorporated herein by reference as if reproduced in their entirety.
Due to their respective channel spacing, signal integrity may be more critical in DWDM networks than in CWDM networks. For instance, while a relatively small fluctuation/variation in signal integrity (e.g., wavelength drift) may be acceptable in CWDM networks, an equivalent variation may substantially reduce service quality in DWDM networks. Consequently, many CWDM systems may implement some strategy for correcting wavelength float. One strategy for correcting wavelength float is to provide wavelength locking via a feedback system that compares the actual laser output wavelength to the target laser output wavelength. Such feedback systems may employ a wavelength locker (λ-locker) to detect a difference between output and target wavelengths (e.g., a wavelength deviation), and an element manager to adjust the laser output accordingly. Specifically the λ-locker may detect the wavelength deviation by comparing a reference signal to a signal transmitted through an etalon to determine a signal differential, e.g., a difference in phase, amplitude, frequency, or combinations thereof, which may correspond to the output signal's deviation from the target wavelength. As such, the λ-locker may use the signal intensity differential to determine the wavelength deviation, which may be communicated to the element manager so that the laser's output can be adjusted accordingly. Wavelength locking techniques may be described in greater detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/579,196 filed on Oct. 14, 2009 by Hongbing Lei et al., and entitled “Wavelength Locker for Simultaneous Control of Multiple Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing Transmitters”, which is incorporated by reference herein as if reproduced in its entirety.
Conventional distributed wavelength locking schemes may employ one dedicated λ-locker for each downstream channel (i.e., one λ-locker per transmitter), thereby using a separate λ-locker to provide wavelength locking to each respective laser source. Specifically, a dedicated wavelength locker may be located between each of the optical transmitters and the optical multiplexer and may be configured to detect wavelength float in each optical transmitter's output signal before the plurality of output signals are multiplexed into a WDM signal. However, λ-lockers may be relatively expensive such that networks employing more λ-lockers (e.g., dedicated λ-lockers, or one λ-locker per channel) may be substantially more expensive that those that employ fewer wavelength lockers (e.g., one λ-locker for multiple channels). For instance, conventional centralized wavelength locking schemes may employ a centralized λ-locker (e.g., a single λ-locker for all channels), and hence may be a cost effective alternative to conventional distributed networks. Specifically, the centralized λ-locker may be located downstream from the optical multiplexer, and may be configured to detect wavelength float in a plurality of channels in the WDM signal.
Disclosed herein is an apparatus comprising at least one processor configured to receive a WDM signal from a remote node, wherein the WDM signal comprises a first channel carrying a first remotely generated signal, a second channel carrying a second remotely generated signal, and a third channel, adapt the WDM signal into a composite WDM signal by dropping the first remotely generated signal from the first channel, adding a first locally generated signal to the first channel; and adding a second locally generated signal to the third channel, and provide wavelength locking to the first locally generated signal and the second locally generated signal without providing wavelength locking to the second remotely generated signal.
Also disclosed herein is an apparatus comprising a first transponder configured to generate a first optical signal, a second transponder configured to generate a second optical signal, an optical fiber configured to propagate a third optical signal, wherein the third optical signal is not generated by the apparatus, an optical multiplexer configured to combine the first optical signal, the second optical signal, and the third optical signal into a composite WDM optical signal, and a wavelength locker configured to wavelength lock the first optical signal and the second optical signal, but not the third optical signal, wherein the first optical signal and the second optical signal are wavelength locked using a first dither frequency that is different than a second dither frequency used to lock the third optical signal, and wherein the first optical signal and the second optical signal share the first dither frequency using a time division multiplexing (TDM) wavelength locking scheme that is localized to the apparatus.
Also disclosed herein is a method comprising assigning, by a network manager, a first dither frequency to a first intermediate node in a network and a second dither frequency to a second intermediate node in the network, wherein the first dither frequency is different than the second dither frequency, providing, by the first intermediate node, wavelength locking to a first plurality of optical signals in a first WDM signal, wherein the first plurality of optical signals are generated by the first intermediate node and comprise the first dither frequency, but not the second dither frequency, providing, by the second intermediate node, wavelength locking to a second plurality of optical signals in a composite WDM signal that comprises both the second plurality of optical signals and at least some of the first plurality of optical signals, wherein the second plurality of optical signals are generated by the second intermediate node and comprise the second dither frequency, but not the first dither frequency; and transmitting, by the second intermediate node, the composite WDM signal to a third intermediate node.
These and other features will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and claims.
For a more complete understanding of this disclosure, reference is now made to the following brief description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts.
It should be understood at the outset that, although an illustrative implementation of one or more embodiments are provided below, the disclosed systems and/or methods may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or in existence. The disclosure should in no way be limited to the illustrative implementations, drawings, and techniques illustrated below, including the exemplary designs and implementations illustrated and described herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
To provide wavelength locking in a plurality of channels in a WDM signal, the centralized wavelength locker may first need to isolate each output signal corresponding to the channels that will receive wavelength locking. One method for achieving such isolation in the WDM signal is to introduce a dither signal into the appropriate output signal. Specifically, a dither signal may comprise a low intensity singular tone (e.g., a small single tone component signal) that can be selectively introduced into an output signal and then used to distinguish the output signal from other output signals in a WDM signal. For instance, the WDM signal may be electronically filtered according to the frequency of the dither signal (dither frequency) to track a spectral component that carries the dither frequency. Various methods may exist for introducing dither signals into the output signal of a laser transmitter, such as by modulating the bias current of the transmitter at a rate that corresponds to the dither frequency. However, the centralized λ-locker can only isolate an output signal whose dither frequency is unique within the WDM signal, e.g., when no other output signals aside from the isolated output signal comprise a dither signal having the same dither frequency. As such, centralized wavelength locking schemes may use a multiple-access approach so that a single λ-locker may provide wavelength locking to multiple channels.
One centralized wavelength locking scheme may be a TDM wavelength locking scheme. The TDM wavelength locking scheme may sequentially introduce the same frequency dither signal into each of the optical channels according to a pre-determined sequence e.g., a TDM window comprising a plurality of timeslots (T1, T2, T3, etc.) assigned to the plurality of optical channels. The λ-locker may then track the spectral component corresponding to the dither frequency according to the pre-determined sequence, thereby isolating each output signal at the appropriate timeslot. Thereafter, the centralized λ-locker may detect the corresponding wavelength deviations in a manner similar to that used by the dedicated λ-locker. Hence, a TDM wavelength locking scheme may sequentially provide wavelength locking to each of the channels according to a TDM window.
The laser transmitters 101-104 may be any devices used to transmit optical signals (e.g., output signals) in an optical network. In an embodiment, the TX-1101 may be configured to transmit a first output signal (λ1) in a first channel (CH1), the TX-2102 may be configured to transmit a second output signal (λ2) in a second channel (CH2), the TX-3103 may be configured to transmit a third output signal (λ3) in a third channel (CH3), and the TX-4104 may be configured to transmit a fourth output signal (λ4) in a fourth channel (CH4). Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the node 100 may comprise any number of optical transmitters (e.g., TX-1, TX-2, . . . TX-N, where N is an integer greater than 1) configured to transmit any number of output signals (e.g., λ1, λ2, . . . λn, where n is an integer greater than 1) in any number of Channels (e.g., CH1, CH2 . . . CHN), even though only four optical transmitters are described herein. The MUX 105 may be any device configured to multiplex a plurality of output signals into a WDM optical signal. The λ-lockerf100 106 may be any device configured to detect wavelength drift in one or more output signals. The element manager 107 may be any device configured to coordinate TDM wavelength locking in the node 100.
The dither signal generators 111-114 may be any device or devices capable of introducing, or facilitating the introduction of, a dither signal into the output signals of the optical transmitters 101-104. For instance, the dither signal generators 111-114 may be configured to introduce a dither signal into the output signal by modulating the bias current of the transmitters 101-104. In an embodiment, the dither signal generators 111-114 may include: a first dither signal generator 111 configured to introduce a first dither signal (Dither-1f100) into the λ1; a second dither signal generator 112 configured to introduce a second dither signal (Dither-2f100) into the λ2; a third dither signal generator 113 configured to introduce a third dither signal (Dither-3f100) into the λ3; and a fourth dither signal generator 114 configured to introduce a fourth dither signal (Dither-4f100) into the λ4. In an embodiment, the Dither-1f100, the Dither-2f100, the Dither-3f100, and the Dither-4f100 may all comprise a first dither frequency (f100). In the same or other embodiments, the λ-lockerf100 106 may be configured to electronically filter the WDM signal according to the f100.
In an embodiment, the element manager 107 may be configured to coordinate TDM wavelength locking in the node 100 by synchronizing the introduction of the dither signals into the output signals according to a predetermined sequence 190, and then communicating the predetermined sequence 190 to the λ-lockerf100 106. For instance, the element manager may coordinate the introduction of the Dither-1f100, the Dither-2f100, the Dither-3f100, and the Dither-4f100 into the λ1, the λ2, the λ3, and the λ4 (respectively) according to the predetermined sequence 190. The pre-determined sequence 190 may comprise any method or manner of coordinating the introduction of the dither signals into the output signals with the detection of the corresponding output signals by the λ-lockerf100 106. In an embodiment, the pre-determined sequence 190 may comprise a repetitious sequence of a TDM window comprising a plurality of timeslots (e.g., T1, T2, T3, and T4) that are assigned to the respective channels or dither signals. For instance, the TDM window may comprise a first timeslot (T1) assigned to the Dither-1f100, a second timeslot (T2) assigned to the Dither-2f100, a third timeslot (T3) assigned to the Dither-3f100, and a fourth timeslot (T4) assigned to the Dither-4f100.
The λ-lockerf100 106 may use the pre-determined sequence 190 to determine which channel the isolated output signal corresponds to so that the correct target wavelength can be used to determine the corresponding wavelength deviation. For instance, the λ-lockerf100 106 may determine the wavelength deviation of the λ1 by comparing the isolated signal's wavelength to the CH1's target wavelength at the T1, the wavelength float of the λ2 by comparing the isolated signal's wavelength to the CH2's target wavelength at the T2, the wavelength float of the λ3 by comparing the isolated signal's wavelength to the CH3's target wavelength at the T3, and the wavelength float of the λ4 by comparing the isolated signal's wavelength to the CH4's target wavelength at the T4. Subsequently (or concurrently), the λ-lockerf100 106 may communicate the corresponding wavelength deviation to the element manager 107. Alternatively, the wavelength deviation may be communicated to a central processing unit (CPU) or third party device used to independently or collectively correct the output signals.
Conventional FDM wavelength locking may be one alternative to conventional TDM wavelength. In a conventional FDM wavelength locking scheme, the dither signals may be applied at the same time, but may comprise different dither frequencies. For instance, a dither signal comprising a unique dither signal (e.g., f100, f200, f300 . . . fn×100) may be continuously introduced into the various output signals (λ1, λ2, λ3 . . . λn) such that the resulting spectral components (each of which corresponding to a different dither frequency) may be contemporaneously (e.g., rather than sequentially) tracked to simultaneously isolate each of the output signals. Hence, the FDM wavelength locking scheme may use a dither signal comprising a unique dither frequency (e.g., f100, f200, f300 . . . fn×100) to isolate each of the output signals (e.g., λ1, λ2, and λ3 . . . λn).
In summary, conventional centralized TDM and FDM wavelength locking schemes take different approaches to achieve centralized wavelength locking in DWDM networks. The TDM wavelength locking scheme sequentially isolates a plurality of output signals (e.g., λ1, λ2, λ3, . . . λn) by tracking a single spectral component corresponding to a single dither frequency (e.g., f100) according to a pre-determined TDM window (e.g., λ1 at T1, λ2 at T2, . . . λn at TN, etc.). In contrast, the FDM wavelength locking scheme isolates a plurality of output signals (e.g., λ1, λ2, λ3, . . . λn) by tracking a plurality of unique spectral components each of which correspond to a different dither frequency (e.g., f1, f2, f3 . . . fn). Each approach may have its advantages/disadvantages depending on the network environment, architecture, etc. For instance, conventional FDM λ-lockers may be somewhat more costly than their TDM counterparts because FDM λ-lockers may employ a plurality of electronic filters (e.g., rather than just one electronic filter) such that the WDM signal may be filtered according to a plurality of dither frequencies. That is to say, λ-lockers comprising more electronic filters may, ceteris paribus, be more expensive than λ-lockers comprising fewer electronic filters. On the other hand, implementing a centralized TDM wavelength locking approach may introduce complexities into the wavelength locking scheme due to the synchronization required to distribute a single dither frequency amongst a plurality of channels, e.g., especially in DWDM networks comprising many channels. Nevertheless, both the conventional centralized TDM wavelength locking scheme and the conventional centralized FDM wavelength locking scheme may be suitable and/or cost-effective for providing centralized wavelength locking in relatively simple DWDM networks, e.g., point-to-point (P2P) DWDM networks.
The P2P DWDM network 300 may comprise a first node 310 corresponding to a first point and a second node 320 corresponding to a second point. The first node 310 may be any device configured to transmit a WDM signal to the second node 320, and may comprise a plurality of transponders 311-314, an MUX 315, a λ-locker 316, and an element manager 317, arranged as shown in
The first node 310 may be configured to implement either a TDM wavelength locking architecture or an FDM wavelength locking architecture. For instance, the Dither-1, the Dither-2, the Dither-3, and the Dither-4 may comprise substantially the same dither frequency (e.g., f100) when the node 310 is configured to implement a conventional TDM wavelength locking scheme. Alternatively, the Dither-1, the Dither-2, the Dither-3, and the Dither-4 may comprise substantially unique dither frequencies (e.g., f100, f200, f300, and f400) when the node 310 is configured to implement a conventional FDM wavelength locking scheme. Accordingly, the λ-locker 316 and the element manager 317 may be configured substantially similar to the λ-lockerf100 106 and the element manager 107 when the first node 310 is configured to implement a conventional TDM wavelength locking scheme. Alternatively, the λ-locker 316 and the element manager 317 may be configured substantially similar to the λ-lockerf100-f400 206 and the element manager 207 when the first node 310 is configured to implement an FDM wavelength locking scheme.
Conventional centralized wavelength locking schemes, such as the TDM and FDM wavelength locking schemes described above, may be well suited and cost effective for simple optical networks, such as the P2P DWDM network 300. However, conventional centralized wavelength locking schemes may be ill suited and/or less cost effective for large, complex optical networks, such as DWDM networks comprising one or more intermediate nodes that are configured to add/drop channels to/from the WDM signal. See, e.g.,
Further, conventional TDM and FDM centralized wavelength locking schemes (i.e., using one λ-locker for the entire network) may be unable to provide wavelength locking to all channels or transmitters in some complex DWDM networks. For instance, some DWDM networks may use different wavelengths on different segments (e.g., use λ1-λ10 on a first segment and λ11-λ20 on a second segment, etc.), and consequently there may be no suitable location to place a centralized λ-locker in the DWDM network, e.g., there may be no stretch of fiber that carries all wavelengths. See, e.g.,
Disclosed herein is a shared wavelength locking scheme for using multiple shared λ-lockers to provide wavelength locking to a large number of transponders in a DWDM network. The shared wavelength locking scheme may distribute shared λ-lockers to a plurality of intermediate nodes, e.g., any remote nodes comprising add/drop sites. Each shared λ-locker may be configured to provide wavelength locking only to those output signals that are generated locally, while ignoring output signals that are not generated locally. For instance, a distributed λ-locker may provide wavelength locking to any output signals that are generated by the hosting or proximately located intermediate node, while ignoring output signals that are not generated by the hosting or proximately intermediate node. The distributed λ-locker may differentiate locally generated output signals from non-locally generated output signals according to the former's inclusion of a unique dither frequency, which may serve as an RF identification (ID) tag. For instance, each intermediate node may be assigned a unique dither frequency (e.g., P1, P2, . . . and PN may be assigned f100f200, and fN×100, respectively) such that only those output signals generated at the given intermediate node may comprise the corresponding dither frequency. Accordingly, the shared λ-locker may be configured to electronically filter the WDM signal according to the corresponding unique dither frequency, thereby isolating the locally generated output signals from the non-locally generated output signals. The shared λ-lockers and element managers may then provide wavelength locking to the local transmitters according to a localized TDM wavelength locking scheme.
The shared wavelength locking scheme may offer several advantages over conventional centralized wavelength locking schemes. For instance, each shared λ-locker may electronically filter the WDM signal at only the corresponding dither frequency (rather than at a plurality of dither frequencies), thereby allowing the shared λ-lockers to comprise fewer electronic components than conventional FDM λ-lockers (e.g., which may typically comprise as many as one RF filter per channel). Thus, the shared wavelength locking scheme may offer cost savings over distributed FDM wavelength locking schemes. Further, the shared wavelength locking scheme may only need localized synchronization, rather than network-wide synchronization, e.g., as would be required by a conventional distributed TDM wavelength locking schemes. For instance, the shared λ-lockers may only need to communicate with a network manager upon initialization, e.g., when the locker is physically installed at a node, to receive a unique dither frequency assignment. Subsequently (e.g., after receiving the unique dither frequency assignment), the shared λ-locker may operate substantially independently such that no further network level coordination is required with respect to wavelength locking. Consequently, the management of wavelength locking at the respective intermediate nodes may be substantially localized, thereby avoiding many of the problems associated with coordinating multi-component synchronization on the network level. As such, the shared wavelength locking scheme may be more scalable for large/complex DWDM networks than conventional TDM or FDM wavelength locking schemes.
The λ1-λj may be represented as a dashed line in the network architecture 400, and may be used to carry traffic communicated between the P2 420 and the P3 430 over the S23. For instance, the P2 420 may send the λ1-λj to the P3 430 as eastbound traffic (e.g., via S23), while the P3 430 may send the λ1-λj to the P2 420 as westbound traffic (e.g., via S23). Additionally, the λ1-λj may be re-used to carry traffic communicated between the P4 440 and the P1 410 over the S41. For instance, the P4 440 may send the λ1-λj to the P1 410 as eastbound traffic (e.g., via S41), while the P1 410 may send the λ1-λj to the P4 440 as westbound traffic (e.g., via S41).
The λj+1-λk may be represented as a dot-dot-dashed line in the network architecture 400, and may be used to carry traffic communicated between the P1410 and the P2 420 over the S12. For instance, the P1 410 may send the λj+1-λk to the P2 420 as eastbound traffic (e.g., via S12), while the P2 420 may send the λj+1-λk to the P1 410 as westbound traffic (e.g., via S12). Additionally, the λj+1-λk may be re-used to carry traffic communicated between the P3 430 and the P4 440 over the S34. For instance, the P3 430 may send the λj+1-λk to the P4 440 as eastbound traffic (e.g., via S34), while the P4 440 may send the λj+1-λk to the P3 430 as westbound traffic (e.g., via S34).
The λk+1-λm may be represented as a dotted line in the network architecture 400, and may be used to carry traffic communicated between the P2 420 and the P4 440 over two paths, S12/S41 and S34/S23. For instance, the P2 420 may send the λk+1-λm to the P4 440 as eastbound traffic (e.g., via S23 and S34) or as westbound traffic (e.g., via S12 and S41), while the P4 440 may send the λk+1-λm to the P2 420 as eastbound traffic (e.g., via S41 and S12), or as westbound traffic (e.g., via S34 and S23). Accordingly, neither the P1 410 nor the P3 430 may be configured to add or drop any of wavelengths/signals within the λk+1-λm.
The λm+1-λn may be represented as a dot-dashed line in the network architecture 400, and may be used to carry traffic communicated between the P1 410 and the P3 430 over all of the S12, the S23, the S34, and S41. For instance, the P1 410 may send the λm+1-λn to the P3 430 as eastbound traffic (e.g., via S12 and S23) or as westbound traffic (e.g., via S41 and S34), while the P3 430 may send the λm+1-λn to the P1 410 as eastbound traffic (e.g., via S34 and S41) or as westbound traffic (e.g., via S23 and S12). Accordingly, neither the P2 420 nor the P4 440 may be configured to add or drop any of wavelengths/signals within the λm+1-λn.
In an embodiment, a unique dither frequency may be assigned to each of the P1 410, the P2 420, the P3 430, and the P4 440. For instance, an f100 may be assigned to the P1 410, an f200 may be assigned to the P2 420, an f300 may be assigned to the P3 430, and an f400 may be assigned to the P4 440. Accordingly, a dither frequency signal comprising the respective assigned dither frequencies may be included in the output signals generated by the P1 410, the P2 420, the P3 430, and the P4 440. For instance, the P1 410 may include a dither signal corresponding to the f100 (Ditherf100) in each of its output signals in a TDM manner, the P2 420 may include a dither signal corresponding to the f200 (Ditherf200) in each of its output signals, the P3 430 may include a dither signal corresponding to the f300 (Ditherf200) in each of its output signals, and the P4 440 may include a dither signal corresponding to the f400 (Ditherf400) in each of its output signals.
The WL1E 412, the WL1W 414, the WL2E 422, the WL2W 424, the WL3E 432, the WL3W 434, the WL4E 442, and the WL4W 444 may be shared λ-lockers that are configured to provide wavelength locking to their corresponding nodes according to the shared wavelength locking scheme. For instance: the WL1E 412 and the WL1W 414 may provide wavelength locking to signals generated by the P1 410 by electronically filtering the WDM signals according to the f100; the WL2E 422 and the WL2W 424 may provide wavelength locking to signals generated by the P2 420 by electronically filtering the WDM signals according to the f200; the WL3E 432 and the WL3W 434 may provide wavelength locking to signals generated at the P3 430 by electronically filtering the WDM signals according to the f300; and the WL4E 442 and the WL4W 444 may provide wavelength locking to signals generated at the P4 440 by electronically filtering the WDM signals according to the f400.
In an embodiment, each of the WL1E 412 and the WL2E 422, the WL3E 432, and the WL4E 442 may provide wavelength locking to eastbound traffic generated by the P1 410, the P2 420, the P3 430, and the P4 440 (respectively), while each of the WL1W 414, the WL2W 424, the WL3W 434, and the WL4W 444 may provide wavelength locking to westbound traffic generated by the P1 410, the P2 420, the P3 430, and the P4 440 (respectively).
In an embodiment, the WL1E 412 may provide wavelength locking to all eastbound traffic (e.g., λj+1-λk and λm+1-λn) transmitted by the P1 410 over the S12, but may ignore all other eastbound traffic (e.g., λk+1-λm), while the WL1W 414 may provide wavelength locking to all westbound traffic (e.g., λ1-λj and λm+1-λn) transmitted by the P1 410 over the S41, but may ignore all other westbound traffic (e.g., λk+1-λm).
In an embodiment, the WL2E 422 may provide wavelength locking to the eastbound traffic (e.g., λ1-λj and λk+1-λm) transmitted by the P2 420 over the S23, but may ignore all other eastbound traffic (e.g., λm+1-λn). The WL2W 424 may provide wavelength locking to all westbound traffic (e.g., λj+1-λk and λk+1-λm) transmitted by the P2 420 over the S12, but may ignore all other westbound traffic (e.g., λmk+1-λn).
In an embodiment, the WL3E 432 may provide wavelength locking to the eastbound traffic (e.g., λj+1-λk and λm+1-λn) transmitted by the P3 430 over the S34, but may ignore all other eastbound traffic (e.g., λk+1-λm), while the WL3W 434 may provide wavelength locking to all westbound traffic (e.g., λ1-λj and λm+1-λn) transmitted by the P3 430 over the S23, but may ignore all other westbound traffic (e.g., λk+1-λm).
In an embodiment, the WL4E 442 may provide wavelength locking to the eastbound traffic (e.g., λ1-λj and λk+1-λm) transmitted by the P4 440 over the S41, but may ignore all other eastbound traffic (e.g., λm+1-λn) transmitted over S41, while the WL4W 444 may provide wavelength locking to all westbound traffic (e.g., λj+1-λk and λk+1-λm) transmitted by the P4 440 over the S34, but may ignore all other westbound traffic (e.g., λm+1-λn) transmitted over S41.
In an embodiment, each of the WL1E 412, the WL1W 414, the WL2E 422, the WL2W 424, the WL3E 432, the WL3W 434, the WL4E 442, and the WL4W 444 may sequentially provide wavelength locking according to their own localized TDM sequence (e.g., two separate TDM windows per node: one for locally generated eastbound traffic and one for locally generated westbound traffic). One or more of the individual channels may be locally disabled and/or locally enabled by the assigned node without intervention and/or cooperation on the network level in respect to wavelength locking, e.g., without coordination by a network manager. For example, the P1 410 may locally disable/enable any channel corresponding to eastbound traffic (λj+1-λk and λm+1-λn) or westbound traffic (λ1-λj and λm+1-λn), the P2 420 may locally disable/enable any channel corresponding to eastbound traffic (e.g., λ1-λj and λk+1-λm) or westbound traffic (λj+1-λk and λk+1-λm), the P3 430 may locally disable/enable any channel corresponding to eastbound traffic (λj+1-λk and λm+1-λn) or westbound traffic (λ1-λj and λm+1-λn), and the P4 440 may locally disable/enable any channel corresponding to eastbound traffic (λ1-λj and λk+1-λm) or westbound traffic (λj+1-λk and λk+1-λm). In some embodiments, locally enabling/disabling a channel may comprise assigning/revoking a timeslot assignment in the relevant localized TDM sequence/window, but may not comprise changing any existing dither frequency assignments.
The λ-lockerf500 506 may be configured to provide wavelength locking to the TRX-3f500 513 and the TRX-4f500 514 to correct wavelength drift in the λ3′ and the λ4′, respectively, but may otherwise ignore (i.e., not provide wavelength locking to) the optical signals λ1 and λ2. For instance, the TRX-3f500 513 and the TRX-4f500 514 may be configured to introduce a Dither-3f500 and a Dither-4f500 into the λ3′ and the λ4′, respectively. The Dither-3f500 and the Dither-4f500 may correspond to the f500, which may be unique to the intermediate node 500 such that no signals generated in other network nodes comprise a dither signal corresponding to the f500. In an embodiment, the Dither-3f500 and the Dither-4f500 may comprise the same dither signal that is introduced into the CH3 and the CH4 at different times. Hence, the λ1 and λ2 may not comprise a dither signal having the f500, and therefore the λ3′ and λ4′ may be isolated from the λ1 and λ2 by electronically filtering the WDM signal according to the f500.
In an embodiment, the TRX-3f500 513, the TRX-4f500 514, the λ-lockerf500 506, and the element manager 507 may be configured to implement a localized TDM wavelength locking scheme. For instance, the element manager may coordinate a localized synchronization of the TRX-3f500 513, the TRX-4f500 514, and the λ-lockerf500 506 according to a predetermined localized sequence 590. Pursuant to the predetermined localized sequence 590, the TRX-3f500 513 and the TRX-4f500 514 may coordinate their introductions of the Dither-3f500 and the Dither-4f500 into the λ3′ and λ4′ (respectively) with the λ-lockerf500's 506 sequential detection of the wavelength drift associated with the λ3′ and λ4′. The predetermined localized sequence 590 may comprise a localized TDM window comprising a T1 and a T2 that are allocated to the Dither-3f500 and the Dither-4f500 (respectively). In an embodiment, the TDM window may not comprise any timeslots corresponding to non-locally generated output signals (e.g., λ1 and λ2). In an embodiment, the localized TDM window may not be communicated to any devices or components outside of the intermediate node 500, e.g., may not be communicated to a centralized network manager or coordinated with any other intermediate nodes, e.g., the TDM window may be communicated via a separate communication channel or medium in the intermediate node 500. In other embodiments, the localized TDM window may be indirectly communicated outside of the intermediate node 500 (e.g., as overhead in the WDM signal), but may not provide synchronization to any other intermediate nodes (e.g., other nodes/network-devices may be configured to ignore the overhead containing the localized TDM window).
The node-1610 may comprise a TRX-1f100 601, a TRX-3f100 603, a TRX-Mf100 615, a MUX 616, a λ-lockerf100 617, and an element manager 618, arranged as shown in
The node-2620 may comprise a TRX-2f200 602, a TRX-4f200 604, a TRX-Nf200 625, an MUX 626, a λ-lockerf100 627, an element manager 628, a DeMUX 629, and an RX-1641, arranged as shown in
In an embodiment, the TRX-2f200 602, the TRX-4f200 604, and the TRX-Nf200 625 may sequentially introduce a Dither-2f200, a Dither-4f200, and a dither signal corresponding to the CHN (Dither-Nf200) into the λ2, the λ4, and the λn (respectively) according to a second localized sequence provided by the element manager 628, where each of the Dither-2f200, the Dither-4f200, and the Dither-Nf200 comprise the f200. In an embodiment, the Dither-2f200, the Dither-4f200, and the Dither-Nf200 may comprise the same dither signal introduced into the CH2, CH4, and CHN at different times. The second localized sequence may be somewhat similar to the first localized sequence, but may be localized to the node-2620, rather than the node-1610. The second localized sequences and may be communicated to the λ-lockerf200 627 by the element manager 628 such that the λ-lockerf200 627 can coordinate the detection of wavelength deviation in each of the CH2, the CH4, and the CHN with the sequential introduction of the Dither-2f200, the Dither-4f200, and the Dither-Nf200 (respectively) into the λ2, the λ4, and the λn (respectively). In an embodiment, the second localized sequence may not be related to the first localized sequence, and may not be communicated to any network components outside of node-2620. In other embodiments, the second localized sequence may be indirectly communicated to, but ignored by, remotely located network components such that the second localized sequence may be locally relevant to node-2620, but may not be globally relevant, e.g., may not be used to synchronize wavelength locking in remote nodes.
The node-K 630 may comprise a TRX-1f(k×100) 631, a TRX-2f(k×100) 632, a TRX-Pf(k×100) 635, a MUX 636, a λ-lockerf(k×100) 637, an element manager 638, a DeMUX, 639, and an RX-2642, arranged as shown in
As demonstrated by the network architecture 600, the shared wavelength locking scheme may be easily scalable to large/complex networks, e.g., metro and/or regional optical networks. For instance, the nodes 610-630, as well as one or more intermediate nodes positioned between the node-2620 and the node-K 630 (e.g., node-3, node-4, . . . node-(K−1)) may each be assigned a unique dither frequency (e.g., f100, f200, . . . f(k×100)) such that wavelength locking can be completely localized. This may prevent conflicts between channels (e.g., or two channels comprising the same dither frequency at the same time) such that the λ-lockers 617-637 can differentiate locally generated output signals from remotely generated output signals. One additional advantage is that new nodes may be added without reconfiguring existing nodes with respect to wavelength locking, and that additional channels can be added/removed in existing nodes without network-wide coordination. For instance, a network manager may add a node-(K+1) without disturbing wavelength locking in the nodes 610-630 by provisioning a new dither frequency (e.g., f(k+1)×100). Additionally or alternatively, the node-K 630 may add a new channel (e.g., corresponding to a TRX-(p+1)) without needing to coordinate wavelength locking (e.g., frequencies, timeslots, etc.) with any other nodes in the network 600, e.g., without requiring communication with a network manager regarding wavelength locking for the TRX-(p+1). Likewise, a channel and/or node can be removed without a substantial amount of network level coordination with respect to wavelength locking. Hence, the shared wavelength locking scheme may be well-suited for growing/evolving networks or networks that may be restructured in the future.
The node-2720 may comprise a TRX-2f200 702, a TRX-4f200 704, a TRX-6f600 706, a TRX-8f200 708, a MUX 725, a λ-lockerf200 726, an element manager 727, and an interleaver 728. The TRX-2f200 702, the TRX-4f200 704, the TRX-6f600 706, and the TRX-8f200 708 may be configured to transmit a λ2, a λ4, a λ6, and a λ8 (respectively) down a CH2, a CH4, a CH6, and a CH8 (respectively) of a second WDM signal. In an embodiment, TRX-2f200 702, the TRX-4f200 704, the TRX-6f600 706, and the TRX-8f200 708 may introduce a Dither-2f200, a Dither-4f200, a Dither-6f200, and a Dither-8f200 (respectively) into the λ2, the λ4, the λ6, and the λ8 (respectively) according to an appropriate localized sequence, e.g., a predetermined sequence that is localized to the node-2720. The Dither-2f200, the Dither-4f200, the Dither-6f200, and the Dither-8f200 may each comprise an f200, which may be uniquely assigned to node-2720. In an embodiment, the Dither-2f200, the Dither-4f200, the Dither-6f200, and the Dither-8f200 may comprise the same dither signal introduced into the CH2, the CH4, the CH6, and the CH8 at different times. The MUX 725, the λ-lockerf200 726, and the element manager 727 may be configured similarly to the MUX 715, the λ-lockerf100 716, and the element manager 717. The interleaver 728 may be any device used to combine two multiplexed WDM signals into a composited WDM signal. For instance, the interleaver 728 may comprise a 3-port optical device that is used to combine two sets of DWDM channels (e.g., odd and even channels) into a composite WDM signal stream. As used herein, composite WDM signals may refer to any WDM signal that comprises a wavelength, channel, or output signal that was previously carried in another WDM signal, and is not necessarily used only in the context of interleavers. For instance, the second WDM signal broadcast by the node-2620 may be considered as a composite WDM signal because it has at least one common output signal from the first WDM signal broadcast by the node-1610.
In an embodiment, the composite WDM signal emitted from the interleaver 728 may comprise an optical spectrum 790. The optical spectrum 790 may comprise a wavelength/channel spacing of about 200 GHz between even channels (e.g., 200 GHz between λ2 and λ4, 200 GHz between λ4 and λ6, and 200 GHz between λ6 and λ8), as well as a wavelength/channel spacing of about 200 GHz between odd channels (e.g., 200 GHz between λ1 and λ3, 200 GHz between λ3 and λ5, and 200 GHz between λ5 and λ7). In an embodiment, the optical spectrum 790 may comprise be a wavelength spacing of about 100 GHz between even and odd channels (e.g., 100 GHz between λ1 and λ2, 100 GHz between λ2 and λ3, . . . and 100 GHz between λ7 and λ8). In other embodiments, the channel spacing may vary (e.g., odd-odd and even-odd channel spacing of 100 GHz and 50 GHz respectively) The λ-lockerf200 726 may be configured to filter the composite WDM signal according to the f200, and hence may provide wavelength locking to the output signals corresponding to the even channels (e.g., the λ2, the λ4, the λ6, and the λ8), while ignoring the output signals corresponding to the odd channels (e.g., λ1, the λ3, the λ5, and the λ7).
The shared wavelength locking scheme has been found to be effective in providing wavelength locking under some test scenarios.
The secondary storage 904 is typically comprised of one or more disk drives or tape drives and is used for non-volatile storage of data and as an over-flow data storage device if RAM 908 is not large enough to hold all working data. Secondary storage 904 may be used to store programs that are loaded into RAM 908 when such programs are selected for execution. The ROM 906 is used to store instructions and perhaps data that are read during program execution. ROM 906 is a non-volatile memory device that typically has a small memory capacity relative to the larger memory capacity of secondary storage 904. The RAM 908 is used to store volatile data and perhaps to store instructions. Access to both ROM 906 and RAM 908 is typically faster than access to secondary storage 904.
At least one embodiment is disclosed and variations, combinations, and/or modifications of the embodiment(s) and/or features of the embodiment(s) made by a person having ordinary skill in the art are within the scope of the disclosure. Alternative embodiments that result from combining, integrating, and/or omitting features of the embodiment(s) are also within the scope of the disclosure. Where numerical ranges or limitations are expressly stated, such express ranges or limitations may be understood to include iterative ranges or limitations of like magnitude falling within the expressly stated ranges or limitations (e.g., from about 1 to about 10 includes, 2, 3, 4, etc.; greater than 0.10 includes 0.11, 0.12, 0.13, etc.). For example, whenever a numerical range with a lower limit, R1, and an upper limit, Ru, is disclosed, any number falling within the range is specifically disclosed. In particular, the following numbers within the range are specifically disclosed: R=R1+k*(Ru−R1), wherein k is a variable ranging from 1 percent to 100 percent with a 1 percent increment, i.e., k is 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent, 5 percent, . . . , 50 percent, 51 percent, 52 percent, . . . , 95 percent, 96 percent, 97 percent, 98 percent, 99 percent, or 100 percent. Moreover, any numerical range defined by two R numbers as defined in the above is also specifically disclosed. Use of the term “optionally” with respect to any element of a claim means that the element is required, or alternatively, the element is not required, both alternatives being within the scope of the claim. Use of broader terms such as comprises, includes, and having may be understood to provide support for narrower terms such as consisting of, consisting essentially of, and comprised substantially of. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above but is defined by the claims that follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. Each and every claim is incorporated as further disclosure into the specification and the claims are embodiment(s) of the present disclosure. The discussion of a reference in the disclosure is not an admission that it is prior art, especially any reference that has a publication date after the priority date of this application. The disclosure of all patents, patent applications, and publications cited in the disclosure are hereby incorporated by reference, to the extent that they provide exemplary, procedural, or other details supplementary to the disclosure.
While several embodiments have been provided in the present disclosure, it may be understood that the disclosed systems and methods might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. The present examples are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the intention is not to be limited to the details given herein. For example, the various elements or components may be combined or integrated in another system or certain features may be omitted, or not implemented.
In addition, techniques, systems, subsystems, and methods described and illustrated in the various embodiments as discrete or separate may be combined or integrated with other systems, modules, techniques, or methods without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Other items shown or discussed as coupled or directly coupled or communicating with each other may be indirectly coupled or communicating through some interface, device, or intermediate component whether electrically, mechanically, or otherwise. Other examples of changes, substitutions, and alterations are ascertainable by one skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the spirit and scope disclosed herein.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/362,792, filed Jul. 9, 2010 by Xiao Shen et al., and entitled “Use of Multiple Shared Wavelength Lockers to Stabilize a Large Number of Transponders in a Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Network,” which is incorporated herein by reference as if reproduced in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61362792 | Jul 2010 | US |