Use of omega-3 rich phospholipids in the area of cognitive function

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080070870
  • Publication Number
    20080070870
  • Date Filed
    May 04, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Published
    March 20, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
The invention disclosed describes the of omega-3 rich phospholipids for treating symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in children, children with developmental cognitive disorder, children with autism, elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease and elderly subjects with age associated cognitive decline.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the use of omega-3 fatty acid compositions, and in particular to phospholipid compositions comprising omega-3 fatty acids, to reduce symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in healthy children and children with developmental cognitive disorders as well as methods to reduce symptoms of aged associative cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease in elderly subjects.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Phospholipids can be isolated from a number of different natural sources such as fish, crustaceans such as Antarctic krill and algae (marine phospholipids). Other sources can be soy, sun flower and maize (vegetable phospholipids). In addition phospholipids can be obtained from eggs. Phospholipids with pre-determined fatty acid residues, so called functional phospholipids, can also be obtained using chemical or enzyme catalyzed processes [1-5]. The uses of phospholipids enriched with omega-3 fatty acids EPA/DHA have been contemplated and explored for several years both for naturally extracted [6-9] and synthetic marine phospholipids [10]. Benefits in the areas of cognition, anti-inflammation and cardiovascular disease have been obtained. The driving force behind these developments has been data indicating that phospholipids are superior carriers of fatty acids into tissue such as red blood cells [11] and brain [12] compared to triacylglycerides (TAG). The data suggest that marine phospholipids are more bioactive than fish oil as they are creating a stronger biological effect with the same dose. These observations in combination with an increasing number of scientific publications documenting positive health effects and the nutritional importance of omega-3 fatty acids [13-14] have fueled the research in the area of omega-3 rich functional phospholipids.


The brain and retina possess the highest concentrations of DHA in humans and animals [15]. In fact, DHA supplementation in gestation and lactation improve visual performance in developing dogs [40]. Previous research using rodent models show that age-associated memory loss may be improved with DHA supplementation [43]. Human research has furthermore demonstrated a correlation between low plasma DHA levels and memory impairment, as well as an association between low levels of LCPUFA consumption and Alzheimer's disease [16]. Previously, the use of marine phospholipids in the area of cognitive function has been investigated. Methods to treat adult psychiatric disorders, neurological disorders and several childhood disorders such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dyslexia, dyspraxia and autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) using omega-3 rich phospholipids have been disclosed previously [6,8,10]. In addition, the use of omega-3 rich phospholipids to alleviate inflammation has been disclosed [8]. Actually, omega-3 fatty acids are well-known for their anti-inflammatory properties, as that was one of the earliest identified biological actions of theses fatty acids. Furthermore, it has been shown that omega-3 fatty acids alleviate the symptoms of a series of autoimmune, atherosclerotic and inflammatory diseases [17-19]. Previously, much attention has focused on pro-inflammatory pathways that initiate inflammation, however relatively little is known about the mechanisms that switch off inflammation and resolve the inflammatory response. The transcription factor NF-VB is thought to have a central role in the induction of pro-inflammatory gene expression and has attracted interest as a new target for the treatment of inflammatory disease [20]. Fish oil has anti-inflammatory properties, however new research has shown that it is the fatty acid EPA that is responsible for the prevention of NF-κB activation [21]. Furthermore, recent research has disclosed inflammation is at least a part of the etiologic root of several cognitive disorders. Brain inflammation may be linked to ASD, Alzheimer's disease and age associated cognitive decline/age associated memory decline [22-25]. Marine phospholipids are superior carriers of omega-3 fatty acids into tissue such as red blood cells [11] and the brain [12]. In combination with the anti-inflammatory properties of EPA, marine phospholipids especially with a high EPA:DHA ratio may be potent agents for reducing brain inflammation hence reducing the symptoms of several cognitive disorders such as ASD, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ADHD, dementia and aged associated cognitive decline.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An embodiment of the invention is a method to reduce symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in a child with ADHD comprising administering an effective amount of a marine phospholipid composition to a subject, said symptoms are selected from the group consisting of ability to complete task, ability to stay on task, ability to follow instructions, ability to complete assignments, long term memory, short term memory, ability to make a decision, ability to follow through on decision, ability to engage in conversations, sensitivity to surroundings, ability to plan, ability to carry out plan, ability to listen, interruptions in social situations, temper tantrums, level/frequency of frustration, level/frequency restlessness, frequency/level fidgeting, ability to exhibit delayed gratification, aggressiveness, demanding behavior/frequency of demanding behavior, sleep patterns, restive sleep, interrupted sleep, awakening behavior, disruptive behavior, ability to exhibit control in social situations, ability to extrapolate information and ability to integrate information


Another embodiment of the invention is a method to reduce symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in a child with ASD comprising administering an effective amount of a marine phospholipid composition to a subject, said symptoms are selected from the group consisting of ability to complete task, ability to stay on task, ability to follow instructions, ability to complete assignments, long term memory, short term memory, ability to make a decision, ability to follow through on decision, ability to engage in conversations, sensitivity to surroundings, ability to plan, ability to carry out plan, ability to listen, interruptions in social situations, temper tantrums, level/frequency of frustration, level/frequency restlessness, frequency/level fidgeting, ability to exhibit delayed gratification, aggressiveness, demanding behavior/frequency of demanding behavior, sleep patterns, restive sleep, interrupted sleep, awakening behavior, disruptive behavior, ability to exhibit control in social situations, ability to extrapolate information and ability to integrate information.


Another embodiment of the invention is a method to reduce symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in a normal child comprising administering an effective amount of a marine phospholipid composition, wherein said symptoms are selected from the group consisting of ability to complete task, ability to stay on task, ability to follow instructions, ability to complete assignments, long term memory, short term memory, ability to make a decision, ability to follow through on decision, ability to engage in conversations, sensitivity to surroundings, ability to plan, ability to carry out plan, ability to listen, interruptions in social situations, temper tantrums, level/frequency of frustration, level/frequency restlessness, frequency/level fidgeting, ability to exhibit delayed gratification, aggressiveness, demanding behavior/frequency of demanding behavior, sleep patterns, restive sleep, interrupted sleep, awakening behavior, disruptive behavior, ability to exhibit control in social situations, ability to extrapolate information and ability to integrate information.


Yet another embodiment of the invention is a method to reduce symptoms of age associated cognitive decline in a human subject comprising administering marine phospholipids, said symptoms are selected from the group consisting of remembering names, remembering numbers, recalling location of objects, remembering specific facts, inability to concentrate, confusion, hallucinations and delusions, altered sensation or perception, impaired recognition (agnosia), aphasia, altered sleep patterns, motor system impairment, impaired skilled motor function, disorientation, memory deficit, absent or impaired language ability, personality changes, behavioral change, lack of spontaneity and deterioration of musculature and mobility.


Yet another embodiment of the invention is a method to reduce symptoms of age associated cognitive decline in an animal, preferably a dog, comprising administering marine phospholipids, said symptoms are selected from the group consisting of remembering names, remembering numbers, recalling location of objects, remembering specific facts, inability to concentrate, confusion, hallucinations and delusions, altered sensation or perception, impaired recognition (agnosia), aphasia, altered sleep patterns, motor system impairment, impaired skilled motor function, disorientation, memory deficit, absent or impaired language ability, personality changes, behavioral change, lack of spontaneity and deterioration of musculature and mobility.


In yet another embodiment of the invention is a method to reduce the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease in a subject comprising administering marine phospholipids, said symptoms are selected from the group consisting remembering names, remembering numbers, recalling location of objects, remembering specific facts, inability to concentrate, confusion, hallucinations and delusions, altered sensation or perception, impaired recognition (agnosia), aphasia, altered sleep patterns, motor system impairment, impaired skilled motor function, disorientation, memory deficit, absent or impaired language ability, personality changes, behavioral change, lack of spontaneity and deterioration of musculature and mobility. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the present invention provides a composition comprising phospholipids having the following structure:


wherein R1 is OH or a fatty acid, R2 is OH or a fatty acid, and R3 is a mixture of H, choline, ethanolamine, inositol and serine, said phospholipid having at least 1% of DHA/EPA at positions R1 and/or R2 and from about 20-50% of OH at positions R1 and/or R2. In some embodiments, the composition further comprises a lipid carrier in a ratio of from 1:10 to 10:1 to said phospholipids. In some embodiments, the lipid carrier and said phospholipids are in a ratio of from about 5:1 to 1:5. In some embodiments, the composition comprises from about 20% to about 90% of said phospholipid composition and from about 10% to about 50% of said lipid carrier. The present invention is not limited to any particular lipid carrier. In some embodiments, the lipid carrier is selected from the group consisting of a triglyceride, a diglyceride, an ethyl ester, and a methyl ester and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the composition provides higher uptake of omega-3 fatty acids into plasma as compared to natural marine phospholipids when administered to subjects. In some embodiments, the composition improves the AA/EPA ratio in plasma phospholipids when administered to subjects as compared to natural marine phospholipids. In some embodiments, the composition increases the concentration of omega-3 fatty acids in tissues when administered to subjects as compared to natural marine phospholipids. In some embodiments, the composition reduces the concentration of biomarkers of inflammation when administered to subjects as compared to natural marine phospholipids. In some embodiments, the present invention provides a food product comprising the foregoing compositions. In some embodiments, the present invention provides an animal feed comprising the foregoing compositions. In some embodiments, the present invention provides a food supplement comprising the foregoing compositions. In some embodiments, the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising the foregoing compositions.


In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods of preparing a bioavailable omega-3 fatty acid composition comprising: a) providing a purified phospholipid composition comprising omega-3 fatty acid residues and a purified triglyceride composition comprising omega-3 fatty acid residues; b) combining said phospholipid composition and said triglyceride composition to form a bioavailable omega-3 fatty acid composition. In some embodiments, the bioavailable phospholipid composition is one of the compositions described above. In some embodiments, the methods further comprise the step of encapsulating said bioavailable omega-3 fatty acid composition. In some embodiments, the bioavailable omega-3 fatty acid composition has increased bioavailability as compared to purified triglycerides or phospholipids comprising omega-3 fatty acid residues. In some embodiments, the methods further comprise the step of packaging the bioavailable omega-3 fatty acid composition for use in functional foods. In some embodiments, the methods further comprise the step of assaying the bioavailable omega-3 fatty acid composition for bioavailability. In some embodiments, the methods further comprise administering the bioavailable omega-3 fatty acid composition to a patient. In some embodiments, the present invention provides a food product, animal feed, food supplement or pharmaceutical composition made by the foregoing process.


In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods for reducing symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in a child comprising administering an effective amount of a marine phospholipid composition, wherein said symptoms are selected from the group consisting of ability to complete task, ability to stay on task, ability to follow instructions, ability to complete assignments, psychomotor function, long term memory, short term memory, ability to make a decision, ability to follow through on decision, ability to self-sustain attention, ability to engage in conversations, sensitivity to surroundings, ability to plan, ability to carry out plan, ability to listen, interruptions in social situations, temper tantrums, level/frequency of frustration, level/frequency restlessness, frequency/level fidgeting, ability to exhibit delayed gratification, aggressiveness, demanding behavior/frequency of demanding behavior, sleep patterns, restive sleep, interrupted sleep, awakening behavior, disruptive behavior, ability to exhibit control in social situations, ability to extrapolate information and ability to integrate information. In some embodiments, the child exhibits one or more symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), is suspected of having ADHD, or has been diagnosed with ADHD. In some embodiments, the child exhibits one or more symptoms of autistic spectrum disorder, is suspected of having autistic spectrum disorder, or has been diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder. In further embodiments, the present invention provides methods of increasing cognitive performance in an aging mammal comprising administering an effective amount of a marine phospholipid composition. In some embodiments, the cognitive performance is selected from the group consisting of memory loss, forgetfulness, short-term memory loss, aphasia, disorientation, disinhibition, and behavioral changes. In some embodiments, the mammal is a human. In some embodiments, the mammal is a pet selected from the group consisting of cats and dogs. In some embodiments, the mammal has symptoms of age-associated memory impairment or decline.


The foregoing methods are not limited to the use of any particular marine phospholipid composition. In some embodiments, the marine phospholipid composition comprises phospholipids having the following structure:


wherein R1 is OH or a fatty acid, R2 is OH or a fatty acid, and R3 is a mixture of H, choline, ethanolamine, inositol and serine, said phospholipid having at least 1% of omega-3 fatty acid moieties at positions R1 and/or R2. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition comprises from about 20-50% of OH at positions R1 and/or R2. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition further comprises a lipid carrier. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is prepared from natural marine phospholipids isolated from a marine organism. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is enzymatically prepared by reacting lecithin with DHA and EPA in the presence of an enzyme. In some embodiments, the lecithin is soybean or egg lecithin. In some embodiments, the omega-3 fatty acid moieties are selected from the group of EPA and DHA and combination thereof. In some embodiments, the effective amount of said phospholipid composition comprises from about 300 to about 1000 mg omega-3 fatty acids. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is administered orally. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is provided in a gel capsule or pill.


In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods of treating a subject by administration of a marine phospholipid composition comprising administering a marine phospholipid composition to said subject under conditions such that a desired condition is improved, wherein said conditions is selected from the group consisting of fertility, physical endurance, sports performance, muscle soreness, inflammation, auto-immune stimulation, metabolic syndrome, obesity and type II diabetes. In some embodiments, the subject is a human. In some embodiments, the subject is a companion animal. The present invention is not limited to any particular marine phospholipid composition. In some embodiments, the marine phospholipid composition comprises phospholipids having the following structure:


wherein R1 is OH or a fatty acid, R2 is OH or a fatty acid, and R3 is a mixture of H, choline, ethanolamine, inositol and serine, said phospholipid having at least 1% of omega-3 fatty acid moieties at positions R1 and/or R2. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition comprises from about 20-50% of OH at positions R1 and/or R2. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is prepared from natural marine phospholipids isolated from a marine organism. In some embodiments, the composition further comprises a lipid carrier. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is enzymatically prepared by reacting lecithin with DHA and EPA in the presence of an enzyme. In some embodiments, the lecithin is soybean or egg lecithin. In some embodiments, the omega-3 fatty acid moieties are selected from the group of EPA and DHA and combination thereof. In some embodiments, the effective amount of said phospholipid composition comprises from about 300 to about 1000 mg omega-3 fatty acids. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is administered orally. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is provided in a gel capsule or pill. In some embodiments, the human is a male.


In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods for prophylactically treating a subject by administration of a marine phospholipid composition comprising administering a marine phospholipid composition to a subject under conditions such that an undesirable condition is prevented, wherein said undesirable condition is selected from the group consisting of weight gain, infertility, obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes type II, mortality in subjects with a high risk of sudden cardiac death, and induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia. In some embodiments, the subject is at risk for developing a condition selected from the group consisting of weight gain, obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes type II, mortality in subjects with a high risk of sudden cardiac death, and induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia.


In some embodiments, the subject is a human. In some embodiments, the subject is a companion animal. The present invention is not limited to any particular marine phospholipid composition. In some embodiments, the marine phospholipid composition comprises phospholipids having the following structure:


wherein R1 is OH or a fatty acid, R2 is OH or a fatty acid, and R3 is a mixture of H, choline, ethanolamine, inositol and serine, said phospholipid having at least 1% of omega-3 fatty acid moieties at positions R1 and/or R2. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition comprises from about 20-50% of OH at positions R1 and/or R2. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is prepared from natural marine phospholipids isolated from a marine organism. In some embodiments, the composition further comprises a lipid carrier. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is enzymatically prepared by reacting lecithin with DHA and EPA in the presence of an enzyme. In some embodiments, the lecithin is soybean or egg lecithin. In some embodiments, the omega-3 fatty acid moieties are selected from the group of EPA and DHA and combination thereof. In some embodiments, the effective amount of said phospholipid composition comprises from about 300 to about 1000 mg omega-3 fatty acids. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is administered orally. In some embodiments, the phospholipid composition is provided in a gel capsule or pill.




DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1. The composite change score for ADHD subjects receiving placebo and omega-3 phospholipids.



FIG. 2. The composite change score for healthy subjects receiving omega-3.



FIG. 3. Cognitive performance test of aged beagle dogs.




DEFINITIONS

As used herein, “phospholipid” refers to an organic compound having the following general structure:


wherein R1 is a fatty acid residue or —OH, 122 is a fatty acid residue or —OH, and R3 is a —H or nitrogen containing compound choline (HOCH2CH2N+(CH3)3OH), ethanolamine (HOCH2CH2NH2), inositol or serine. R1 and 122 cannot simultaneously be —OH. When R3 is an —OH, the compound is a diacylglycerophosphate, while when R3 is a nitrogen-containing compound, the compound is a phosphatide such as lecithin, cephalin, phosphatidyl serine or plasmalogen.


The R1 site is herein referred to as position 1 of the phospholipid, the R2 site is herein referred to as position 2 of the phospholipid, and the R3 site is herein referred to as position 3 of the phospholipid.


As used herein, the term omega-3 fatty acid refers to polyunsaturated fatty acids that have the final double bond in the hydrocarbon chain between the third and fourth carbon atoms from the methyl end of the molecule. Non-limiting examples of omega-3 fatty acids include, 5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), 4,7,10,13,16,19-docosahexanoic acid (DHA) and 7,10,13,16,19-docosapentanoic acid (DPA).


As used herein, the term bioavailability refers to the degree and rate at which a substance (as a drug) is absorbed into a living system or is made available at the site of physiological activity.


As used herein, the term “functional food” refers to a food product to which a biologically active supplement has been added.


As used herein, the term “fish oil” refers to any oil obtained from a marine source e.g. tuna oil, seal oil and algae oil.


As used herein, the term “lipase” refers to any enzyme capable of hydrolyzing fatty acid esters


As used herein, the term “food supplement” refers to a food product formulated as a dietary or nutritional supplement to be used as part of a diet.


As used herein, the term “extracted marine phospholipid” refers to a composition characterized by being obtained from a natural source such as krill, fish meal, big brain or eggs.


As used herein, the term “acylation” means fatty acids attached to the phospholipid. 100% acylation means that there are no lyso- or glycero PLs.


As used herein, the term “normal child” means a child that has not been diagnosed as suffering from a cognitive disorder.


As used herein, the term “at risk child” means a child exhibiting one or more symptoms of a cognitive disorder.


As used herein, the term “cognition” is used to describe that operation of the mind process by which we become aware of objects of thought and perception including all aspects of perceiving, thinking and remembering.


As used herein, the term “psychomotor” refers to motor action directly proceeding from mental activity.


DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

There is increasing evidence that lack of omega-3 fatty acids is associated with childhood developmental cognitive disorders [26-28]. A number of randomized, controlled trials have now addressed this issue reporting that omega-3 supplementation can reduce behavioral and learning difficulties in both ADHD and dyslexia [28-29]. The treatment should preferably consist not only of a mixture of EPA/DHA, but also include omega-6 fatty acids such as 6,9,12 gamma linolenic acid (GLA) [30]. Fontani at al [31] recently reported the results of the only randomized controlled trial of omega-3 and cognition in healthy individuals. Significant improvements on tests of sustained attention and inhibition were observed, as well as reduction in self-rated symptoms of anger, anxiety, fatigue, depression and confusion with a corresponding increase in self-rated levels of vigor for the omega-3 group compared to placebo. However, this manuscript suffered from a number of significant limitations that make interpretation of the results difficult. The study did not include a practice test to minimize “learning effects” prior to the baseline assessment, nor were the results from the placebo group reported or any comparison made between placebo and the active treatment. Previously, in order to investigate the effect of a treatment on a developmental cognitive disorder, behavioral rating scales have been used as the primary outcome measures. Nowadays, many clinical trials of stimulant medication for children with ADHD include cognitive outcome as a co-primary or secondary outcome measure [32]. This is because cognitive dysfunction occurs commonly in children with ADHD, and also there is now substantial evidence that such dysfunction may be responsive to treatment. In addition, cognitive tests may also provide an objective outcome measure and a more direct measurement of the child's brain function than subjective parent or teacher-rated behavioral rating scales.


An embodiment of the invention is to use omega-3 rich phospholipids with EPA/DHA ratio of 2:1 (preferably substantially free of GLA) to reduce the symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in normal children and children with developmental cognitive disorders such as ADHD, dyslexia, dyspraxia and autism. Non-limiting examples of the symptoms that are alleviated are poor long term memory, poor short term memory, inability to make a decision, inability to follow through on a decision, inability to engage in conversations, insensitivity to surroundings and inability to plan a task. This invention discloses that supplementing a child's diet with phospholipid compositions comprising from about 366 mg/d to about 700 mg/d omega-3 per day (EPA:DHA ratio of 2:1) for 12 weeks improves the cognitive function as assessed using conventional rating scales and questionnaires as well as computerized cognitive tests. Previous publications do not disclose the use of omega-3 fatty acids, and in particular phospholipids comprising mega-3 fatty acids, to reduce the symptoms/specific observation criteria that make up the syndrome.


This invention discloses that supplementing a child's diet with phospholipid compositions comprising from about 360 mg to about 700 mg omega-3 per day (EPA:DHA ratio of 2:1) (preferably substantially free of GLA) for 12 weeks results in the improvement in quality of life and quality of health in a child as assessed by the parents using a questionnaire [32]. In the questionnaire, the parent will answer questions related to the child's quality of life, overall health, physical pain, joy over life, ability to concentrate, safety feeling, energy, bodily appearance, ability to gather information, sleep pattern, ability to perform on activities, capacity for school, personal relationships, negative feelings (such as blue mood, despair, anxiety and depression), abdominal discomfort, incidences of constipation, diarrhea, dry mouth, nausea, heartburn, anger, nervousness, binge eating, chest pain, shortness of breath, blurred vision, tremor, memory loss, drowsiness, fatigue, coordination, mental sharpness, hair, skin, nails, eczema and tendency to sweat.


This invention discloses that after administration of marine phospholipids with a EPA/DHA ratio of 2:1 for one week a number of genes involved in the inflammatory response are regulated in a positive way. Furthermore, it is disclosed that marine phospholipids with EPA/DHA ratio of 1:1 do not regulate any genes involved in the inflammatory response. Examples of the proteins regulated by the high EPA phospholipid are the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), monoglyceride lipase (Mgll), Nuclear Factor-kappaB activating protein (NF-κB AP-1) and Tnf receptor-associated factor 6 (Traf6). C/EBP plays a key role in acute-phase response to inflammatory cytokine IL-6 [34], Traf6 positively regulates the biosynthesis of interleukin-6 and interleukin-12, as well as the I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB cascade [35] and NF-κB AP-1 induce the expression of genes involved in inflammation [36]. Recent research suggests that brain inflammation may be the underlying cause of several cognitive disorders including ASD, aged associated cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia and characterized clinically by progressive cognitive deterioration together with declining activities of daily living and neuropsychiatric symptoms or behavioral changes. Other embodiments of the invention are to use omega-3 rich phospholipids to reduce the symptoms of ASD, aged associated cognitive decline, aged associated memory decline and Alzheimer's disease. Non-limiting examples of the symptoms cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease are memory loss, forgetfulness, short-term memory loss, aphasia, disorientation, disinhibition, behavioral changes and deterioration of musculature and mobility.


This invention also discloses that the fatty acid composition of the brain lipids and phospholipids changes after in take of omega-3 fatty acids for 30 days. A significant reduction of the arachidonic acids can be found in the phospholipids in the brain for the rats given either the EPA- or DRA-rich PL diets. This may affect the inflammatory response in this tissue and thereby have a great impact on cognitive diseases/conditions such as Parkinson's or and Alzheimer's where the inflammatory component is fundamental for the progression of the disease. This invention also discloses that the reduction of ARA is present also in the sn-2 position of the phospholipids in the brain. This is very important as the pro-inflammatory eicosanoids are produced from ARA, which are catalytically hydrolyzed from position 2 on the phospholipid by the action of phospholipase A2. The phospholipase A2 is released after stimuli at the cell wall, it then moves to the nuclear membrane where the hydrolysis of the phospholipid takes place.


Previously, it has been disclosed that omega-3 supplementation has an effect on learning ability in aged Wistar rats [37], as well as improving of retinal function [38] and trainability in puppies [39-42]. In addition it has been shown that extracted phospholipids from pig brain can enhance behavior, learning ability and retinal function in old mice [43].


In another embodiment of this invention, omega-3 rich phospholipids are utilized to improved cognitive and/or retinal function in mammals, preferably aging mammals, such as humans, and pets as dog and cats. Aging humans are generally older than about 40, 50, 60, 70 or 80 years old, while aging pets are preferably more than 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 years old. In some preferred embodiments, phospholipid compositions comprising EPA/DHA in ratio of from about 2:1 are administered in order to improve cognitive function and retinal function. Cognitive function is assessed using the delayed non-matching-to position task (DNMP). The task specifically requires dogs to remember the location of an object for either a short or long delay-period. The test assesses both general cognitive ability, which is indicated by overall performance and memory capacity, which is indicated by performance at long-delays. DNMP is highly sensitive to age and models the early deficits in visuospatial memory developing in mild cognitive impairment as in Alzheimer's disease [44]. The cognitive test data revealed statistically significant differences, with the low dose subjects doing better on the last 5 treatment sessions than they did in baseline testing or on the first five treatment sessions. By contrast, the high dose subjects performed more poorly at the long-delay on the last 5 treatment sessions. In addition, at the short delay, the low and medium dose groups showed substantial improvement on the last test block. These results suggest that the test compound can either improve or impair memory, depending on dose, and that the optimal dose is in the 12 to 26 mg/kg range. The fact that the greatest effect was observed at the short delay is evidence that the treatment produces a global improvement in cognitive functioning, rather than a selective improvement in memory. The ERG analysis revealed statistically significant increases in signal amplitude in the second component of the ERG response in the dark-adapted eye and statistically significant decrease in response latency. The most consistent effect in ERG was an increase in the amplitude of the scoptopic B wave response, which was observed at all three stimulus levels. The scoptopic response is the response of the dark adapted eye and is linked to the function of the rods, photoreceptors in the retina of the eye. The B wave response represents the response of post-receptor cells in the retina, predominantly, the bipolar and horizontal cells. The increased B-wave response, therefore, represents enhanced transmission of visual information from the photoreceptors to the second level retinal cells. In this instance, the enhanced response is for dark vision, but the canine eye contains a higher proportion of rods than that of the primate, suggesting that rod vision is of more general importance for the dog than the human. These results are consistent with the suggestion that retinal processing is enhanced by treatment with the test compound.


In some embodiments, the marine phospholipid compositions are derived from marine organisms such as fish, fish eggs, shrimp, krill, etc. In some embodiments, the marine phospholipids comprise a mixture of phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidyl inositol (PI), and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE). Indeed, the present invention presents the surprising results that phospholipid compositions comprising a mixture of PC, PS, PI and PE are bioavailable and bioefficient. This results in an important advantage over phospholipid compositions synthesized or containing, for example, pure PS, PC, or PI which can be expensive and difficult to make. In some embodiments, the methods of the present invention utilize novel marine lipid compositions comprising an omega-3 containing phospholipid and a triacylglyceride (TG) in a ratio from about 1:10 to 10:1. Preferably the ratio is in the range of from about 3:1 to 1:3, more preferably the ratio is in the range of about 1:2 to 2:1. Preferably, the TG is a fish oil such as tuna oil, herring oil, menhaden oil, krill oil, cod liver oil or algae oil. However, this invention is not limited to omega-3 containing oils as other TG sources are contemplated such as vegetable oils. In some embodiments, the phospholipids in the composition have the following structure:


wherein R1 is OH or a fatty acid, R2 is OH or a fatty acid, and R3 is a mixture of H, choline, ethanolamine, inositol and serine. Attached to position 1 or position 2 are least 1% omega-3 fatty acids, preferably at least 5%, more preferably at least 10% omega-3 fatty acids, up to about 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, or 60% omega-3 fatty acids. The omega-3 fatty acids can be EPA, DHA, DPA or C18:3 (n-3), most preferably the omega-3 fatty acids are EPA and DHA. The phospholipid composition preferably contains OH in position 1 or position 2 in a range of 25% to 50% in order to maximize absorption in-vivo.


Transesterification of phosphatidylcholine (PC) under solvent free conditions has been performed by Haraldsson et al in 1999 [15], with the results of high incorporation of EPA/DHA and with the following hydrolysis profile PC/LPC/GPC=39/44/17. Extensive hydrolysis and by-product formation is generally considered a problem with transesterification reactions, resulting in low product yields. This invention discloses a process for transesterification of crude soybean lecithin (mixture of PC, PE and PD). In the first step, the lecithin is hydrolyzed using a lipase in the presence of water (pH=8). The use of a variety of lipases is contemplated, including, but not limited to, Thermomyces Lanuginosus lipase, Rhizomucor miehei lipase, Candida Antarctica lipase, Pseudomonas fluorescence lipase, and Mucor javanicus lipase. The first step takes around 24 hours and results in a product comprising predominantly of lyso-phospholipids and glycerophospholipids such as PC/LPC/GPC=0/15/85. In the second step, free fatty acids are added such as EPA and DHA, however any omega-3 fatty acid is contemplated. Next a strong vacuum is applied to the reaction vessel for 72 hours. However, the reaction length can be varied in order to obtain a composition with the desired amount of phospholipids and lyso-phospholipids. By extending the reaction time beyond 72 hours, a product comprising more than 65% phospholipids can be obtained. Next, a lipid carrier is added to the reaction mixture in order to reduce the viscosity of the solution. The added amount of triglycerides can be 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% or more, it depends on the requested viscosity of the final product. The lipid carrier can be a fish oil such as tuna oil, menhaden oil and herring oil, or any triglyceride, diglyceride, ethyl- or methylester of a fatty acid. In the final step, the product is subjected to a molecular distillation and the free fatty acids are removed, resulting in a final product comprising of phospholipids (lyso-phospholipids and phospholipids) and triglycerides in a ratio of preferably 2:1.


In some embodiments, the compositions of this invention are contained in acceptable excipients and/or carriers for oral consumption. The actual form of the carrier, and thus, the compositions itself, is not critical. The carrier may be a liquid, gel, gelcap, capsule, powder, solid tablet (coated or non-coated), tea, or the like. The composition is preferably in the form of a tablet or capsule and most preferably in the form of a hard gelatin capsule. Suitable excipient and/or carriers include maltodextrin, calcium carbonate, dicalcium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, dextrose, rice flour, magnesium stearate, stearic acid, croscarmellose sodium, sodium starch glycolate, crospovidone, sucrose, vegetable gums, lactose, methylcellulose, povidone, carboxymethylcellulose, corn starch, and the like (including mixtures thereof). Preferred carriers include calcium carbonate, magnesium stearate, maltodextrin, and mixtures thereof. The various ingredients and the excipient and/or carrier are mixed and formed into the desired form using conventional techniques. The tablet or capsule of the present invention may be coated with an enteric coating that dissolves at a pH of about 6.0 to 7.0. A suitable enteric coating that dissolves in the small intestine but not in the stomach is cellulose acetate phthalate. Further details on techniques for formulation for and administration may be found in the latest edition of Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences (Maack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa.).


In other embodiments, the supplement is provided as a powder or liquid suitable for adding by the consumer to a food or beverage. For example, in some embodiments, the dietary supplement can be administered to an individual in the form of a powder, for instance to be used by mixing into a beverage, or by stirring into a semi-solid food such as a pudding, topping, sauce, puree, cooked cereal, or salad dressing, for instance, or by otherwise adding to a food.


The compositions of the present invention may also be formulated with a number of other compounds. These compounds and substances add to the palatability or sensory perception of the particles (e.g., flavorings and colorings) or improve the nutritional value of the particles (e.g., minerals, vitamins, phytonutrients, antioxidants, etc.).


EXAMPLE 1

50g of soy lecithin from American Lecithin Company Inc (Oxford, CT, USA), 40g of TL-IM lipase from Novozymes (Bagsvaerd, Denmark) and 5g of water (adjusted to pH=8 using NaOH) were mixed in a reaction vessel at 50° C. for 24 hours. Next, 10 g of free fatty acids containing 10% EPA and 50% DHA from Napro Pharma (Brattvaag, Norway) was added, followed by application of vacuum to the reaction vessel. After 72 hours the reaction was terminated and the phospholipid mixture was analyzed using HPLC and GC. The results showed that the relationship between PC/LPC/GPC was 65/35/0, and that the content of EPA and DHA was around 10% and 12%, respectively. Next, 20g of sardine oil was added to the reaction mixture which comprised of 18% EPA and 12% DHA (relative GC peak area), followed by molecular distillation. The final product contained around 70% acetone insolubles, around 30% triglycerides and traces of free fatty acids.


EXAMPLE 2

Marine phospholipids were prepared using either 40% soy PC (American Lecithin Company Inc, Oxford, CT, USA) (MPL1) according to the method in example 1 or using 96% pure soy PC (Phospholipid GmbH, Koln, Germany) (MPL2) according to a method described in [4]. Fatty acid content and the level of bi-products are shown in table 1. The MPL treatments consisted of a mixture of phospholipids, lyso-phospholipids and glycerol-phospholipids. Looking only at the PC/LPC/GPC relationship, it was 64/33/2 and 42/40/18 for MPL1 and MPL2, respectively. Finally, all three treatments were emulsified into skimmed milk.

TABLE 1Composition of the phospholipids used in example 1PC/CompositionLPC/GPC18:2 (n-6)18:3 (n-3)EPADHAMPL164/33/2129 mg/g9 mg/g51 mg/g171 mg/gMPL242/40/18124 mg/g9 mg/g96 mg/g 96 mg/g


18 newly weaned Sprague-Dawley rats were fed the milk emulsions for 1 week. Each rat was placed in its own cage to ensure that they got an even amount of test substance and the milk was consumed by the rat pups ad libitum. After 1 week the experiment was terminated and the rats were decapitated. The animals were kept without food for 24 hours before sampling. Entire livers were collected and frozen immediately using liquid nitrogen (stored at −65° C.). Total RNA was isolated from the liver samples according to the Quiagen Rnaesy Midi Kit Protocol. The RNA samples were quantified and quality measured by NanoDrop and Bioanalyzer. The isolated RNA was hybridized onto a gene chip RAE230 2.0 from Affymetrix (Santa Clara, Calif., USA). The expression level of each gene was measured using an Affymetrix GeneChip 3000 7G scanner. The results were suitable for all chips except 2 and they were excluded from the trial. The results are based on (log) probe set summary expression measures, computed by RMA, and linear models are fitted using Empirical Bayes methods for borrowing strength across genes (using the Limma package in R). The p-value are adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg-method, controlling the False Discovery Rate (FDR), where FDR=the proportion of null-hypotheses of no DE that are falsely rejected.


MPL2 regulates 401 genes versus the control (table 2). A number of genes listed are involved maintenance of the cell, in transcription and protein synthesis as well as signaling pathways. Others are involved in regulation of metabolism and the inflammatory response such as Tnf receptor-associated factor 6 (Traf6_predicted) (fold change of 0.53), guanine nucleotide binding protein alpha inhibiting 2 (Gnai2) (fold change of 0.6, gamma-butyrobetaine hydroxylase (Bbox1) (fold change of 1.32), monoglyceride lipase (Mgll) (fold change 0.52), nuclear NF-kappaB activating protein (fold change 0.65) and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) (fold change of 0.66).

TABLE 2List of genes differentially expressed (DE) by MPL2 versus control.SLR: Estimated signal log-ratio (<0: down regulated gene,>0: up regulated gene).Fold change: Estimated fold change correspondingto the parameter (<1: down regulated gene, >1: upregulated gene). Affy fold change: Estimated fold changeusing the Affymetrix definition (<−1: down regulated gene,>1: up regulated gene) df: Degrees of freedom (=number of arrays − number of estimated parameters)FoldAffyGene-IDGene nametp-valueFDRSLRchangeFold. changedf1367588_a_atribosomal protein L13A−5.220.000050.00568−0.440.74−1.36141367844_atguanine nucleotide binding−5.470.000030.00417−0.540.69−1.4614protein, alpha inhibiting 21367958_atabl-interactor 1−6.420.000000.00119−0.690.62−1.62141367971_atprotein tyrosine phosphatase−6.010.000010.00190−0.360.78−1.28144a21368057_atATP-binding cassette, sub-−5.060.000070.00688−0.540.69−1.4514family D (ALD), member 31368405_atv-ral simian leukemia viral−4.860.000110.00913−0.440.74−1.3614oncogene homolog A (rasrelated)1368646_atmitogen-activated protein4.980.000080.007720.701.621.6214kinase 91368649_atdyskeratosis congenita 1,−6.730.000000.00080−0.530.69−1.4414dyskerin1368662_atring finger protein 39−7.010.000000.00053−0.610.66−1.52141368703_atenigma homolog−5.380.000030.00450−0.760.59−1.70141368824_atcaldesmon 1−7.180.000000.00043−1.000.50−2.00141368841_attranscription factor 4−4.940.000090.00828−0.380.77−1.31141368867_atGERp95−7.830.000000.00019−0.850.56−1.80141369094_a_atprotein tyrosine phosphatase,−7.220.000000.00042−0.970.51−1.9614receptor type, D1369127_a_atprostaglandin F receptor4.850.000110.009210.451.371.37141369174_atSMAD, mothers against DPP−5.190.000050.00581−0.380.77−1.3014homolog 1 (Drosophila)1369227_atChoroidermia5.040.000070.007180.471.391.39141369249_atprogressive ankylosis homolog5.360.000040.004670.481.391.3914(mouse)1369501_atzinc finger protein 2605.170.000050.005950.411.331.33141369517_atpleckstrin homology, Sec7 and4.930.000090.008290.481.401.4014coiled/coil domains 11369546_atbutyrobetaine (gamma), 2-4.960.000090.008110.401.321.3214oxoglutarate dioxygenase 1(gamma-butyrobetainehydroxylase)1369628_atsynaptic vesicle glycoprotein−7.200.000000.00042−1.110.46−2.15142b1369689_atN-ethylmaleimide sensitive6.220.000010.001550.661.581.5814fusion protein1369736_atepithelial membrane protein 15.740.000020.002860.621.541.54141369775_atnuclear ubiquitous casein−7.560.000000.00027−0.790.58−1.7314kinase and cyclin-dependentkinase substrate1370184_atcofilin 1−6.070.000010.00178−0.380.77−1.30141370260_atadducin 3 (gamma)−5.500.000030.00399−0.760.59−1.70141370328_atDickkopf homolog 3 (Xenopus4.800.000120.009640.591.511.5114laevis)1370717_atAP1 gamma subunit binding6.000.000010.001920.581.501.5014protein 11370831_atmonoglyceride lipase−5.470.000030.00414−0.940.52−1.92141370901_atsimilar to hypothetical protein−4.830.000120.00948−0.340.79−1.2714MGC36831 (predicted)1370946_atnuclear factor I/X−10.640.000000.00002−1.170.45−2.25141370949_atmyristoylated alanine rich−7.580.000000.00026−1.170.44−2.2614protein kinase C substrate1370993_atlaminin, gamma 16.130.000010.001710.631.541.54141371034_atone cut domain, family−5.650.000020.00327−1.770.29−3.4014member 11371059_atprotein kinase, cAMP-5.240.000050.005560.481.401.4014dependent, regulatory, type 2,alpha1371345_atmethyl-CpG binding domain−5.320.000040.00491−0.340.79−1.2714protein 3 (predicted)1371361_atsimilar to tensin−7.210.000000.00042−0.600.66−1.51141371394_x_atsimilar to Ab2-143−5.110.000060.00645−0.630.64−1.55141371397_atnitric oxide synthase−5.530.000020.00383−0.340.79−1.2614interacting protein (predicted)1371428_at−5.760.000010.00276−0.370.77−1.29141371430_atdystroglycan 1−5.460.000030.00417−0.620.65−1.53141371432_at−4.950.000090.00811−0.360.78−1.28141371452_atbone marrow stromal cell-−5.050.000070.00705−0.460.73−1.3714derived ubiquitin-like protein1371573_atribosomal protein L36a−5.900.000010.00221−0.400.76−1.3214(predicted)1371589_atUbiquitin-Like 5 Protein−5.280.000040.00518−0.570.68−1.48141371590_s_atUbiquitin-Like 5 Protein−4.940.000090.00829−0.390.76−1.31141371779_atsorting nexin 6 (predicted)5.640.000020.003290.631.551.55141371826_atTranscribed locus−5.580.000020.00359−0.480.72−1.39141371896_atgrowth arrest and DNA-−6.020.000010.00189−0.430.74−1.3514damage-inducible, gammainteracting protein 1 (predicted)1371918_atCD99−5.350.000040.00476−0.370.77−1.29141372057_atCDNA clone MGC: 124976−6.120.000010.00173−0.380.77−1.3014IMAGE: 71109471372137_atbiogenesis of lysosome-related−6.030.000010.00187−0.410.75−1.3214organelles complex-1, subunit1 (predicted)1372142_atarsA arsenite transporter, ATP-−4.930.000090.00829−0.370.77−1.3014binding, homolog 1 (bacterial)(predicted)1372236_atSimilar to Caspase recruitment−4.900.000100.00871−0.360.78−1.2914domain protein 41372469_atTranscribed locus−4.840.000110.00945−0.360.78−1.28141372697_atmitochondrial ribosomal−5.700.000020.00299−0.580.67−1.4914protein S151373031_attripartite motif protein 8−5.130.000060.00628−0.440.74−1.3614(predicted)1373105_atinterleukin 1 receptor-like 1−5.010.000080.00742−0.370.77−1.3014ligand (predicted)1373135_atsimilar to hypothetical protein−5.300.000040.00503−0.550.68−1.4614MGC27441373206_atsimilar to FAD104 (predicted)6.730.000000.000800.641.561.56141373303_atsimilar to mKIAA3013 protein−5.280.000040.00514−0.480.72−1.39141373347_atDMT1-associated protein−6.180.000010.00162−0.730.60−1.66141373378_atATP/GTP binding protein 15.390.000030.004490.511.421.4214(predicted)1373804_atForkhead box P1 (predicted)−5.280.000040.00518−0.590.66−1.51141373885_atchromobox homolog 5−5.940.000010.00208−1.040.48−2.0614(Drosophila HP1a) (predicted)1374002_at−6.780.000000.00074−0.860.55−1.82141374283_atfetal Alzheimer antigen−7.440.000000.00032−0.740.60−1.6714(predicted)1374425_attransducin-like enhancer of−4.910.000100.00849−0.400.76−1.3214split 1, homolog of DrosophilaE(spl) (predicted)1374509_atSimilar to RIKEN cDNA−5.620.000020.00337−0.470.72−1.39141110018O081374511_at5.600.000020.003450.551.471.47141374657_atTranscribed locus−4.880.000100.00890−0.340.79−1.27141374733_atsymplekin (predicted)−5.040.000070.00716−0.360.78−1.28141374772_atsimilar to Chromosome 135.180.000050.005810.461.381.3814open reading frame 211374837_atB-cell CLL/lymphoma 7C−8.920.000000.00006−0.710.61−1.6314(predicted)1374851_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−4.890.000100.00879−0.390.76−1.31142810405O22 (predicted)1374852_athypothetical LOC362592−5.200.000050.00579−0.370.78−1.29141375214_atUDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-−5.310.000040.00500−0.580.67−1.5014galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase2 (predicted)1375335_atheat shock 90 kDa protein 1,−5.260.000040.00538−0.550.68−1.4614beta1375396_atpumilio 1 (Drosophila)−10.050.000000.00003−0.920.53−1.8914(predicted)1375421_a_atpraja 2, RING-H2 motif−6.510.000000.00102−0.600.66−1.5214containing1375453_at−12.320.000000.00000−1.020.49−2.02141375469_atSWI/SNF related, matrix−7.970.000000.00017−0.930.53−1.9014associated, actin dependentregulator of chromatin,subfamily a, member 41375533_atvestigial like 4 (Drosophila)−5.300.000040.00505−0.610.66−1.5214(predicted)1375548_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−5.640.000020.00328−0.580.67−1.50144732418C07 (predicted)1375621_at−7.050.000000.00051−0.960.51−1.95141375632_atsimilar to 60S ribosomal−4.850.000110.00921−0.290.82−1.2214protein L381375650_atbromodomain containing 4−6.640.000000.00088−0.480.71−1.4014(predicted)1375658_atTranscribed locus−5.000.000080.00756−0.440.74−1.35141375696_atinterferon (alpha and beta)4.810.000120.009580.591.511.5114receptor 1 (predicted)1375703_atmyeloid/lymphoid or mixed-−10.200.000000.00003−1.020.49−2.0314lineage leukemia 5 (trithoraxhomolog, Drosophila)(predicted)1375706_at−5.010.000080.00743−0.490.71−1.40141375763_atsimilar to 2700008B19Rik−7.080.000000.00050−0.540.69−1.4514protein1375958_at−5.130.000060.00628−0.650.64−1.57141376059_at5.330.000040.004830.351.281.28141376256_atWD repeat and FYVE domain−9.160.000000.00005−1.100.47−2.1514containing 1 (predicted)1376299_atsimilar to Retinoblastoma-−9.220.000000.00005−0.890.54−1.8514binding protein 2 (RBBP-2)1376450_attransmembrane protein 5−6.260.000010.00147−0.550.68−1.4614(predicted)1376523_atAT rich interactive domain 4A−5.530.000020.00383−0.770.59−1.7014(Rbp1 like) (predicted)1376524_athypothetical protein Dd25−6.690.000000.00082−0.660.63−1.58141376532_atsimilar to FAD104 (predicted)6.060.000010.001780.561.471.47141376728_atTranscribed locus−4.800.000120.00966−0.350.78−1.27141376917_atzinc finger protein 292−5.210.000050.00571−0.660.63−1.58141376982_atTranscribed locus−5.490.000030.00405−0.450.73−1.37141377105_at−6.970.000000.00056−0.890.54−1.85141377302_a_atmethylmalonic aciduria−5.100.000060.00660−0.520.70−1.4314(cobalamin deficiency) type A(predicted)1377524_atsimilar to CG18661-PA−5.360.000030.00465−0.430.74−1.3514(predicted)1377663_atras homolog gene family,−5.000.000080.00756−0.870.55−1.8214member E1377683_atsimilar to hypothetical protein−6.630.000000.00088−0.560.68−1.4714FLJ13045 (predicted)1377728_atLOC499567−5.450.000030.00419−1.030.49−2.04141377766_atTranscribed locus4.800.000120.009640.371.291.29141377899_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−4.990.000080.00760−0.460.73−1.38142810025M15 (predicted)1377906_atDEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box−4.820.000120.00950−0.730.60−1.6614polypeptide 36 (predicted)1377914_atserine/arginine repetitive−6.410.000000.00120−0.980.51−1.9714matrix 1 (predicted)1378155_atsimilar to KIAA1096 protein−5.680.000020.00313−0.890.54−1.86141378163_atTranscribed locus−4.860.000110.00913−0.780.58−1.71141378170_atTranscribed locus−5.000.000080.00756−0.920.53−1.90141378194_a_atrap2 interacting protein x−4.820.000120.00950−0.720.61−1.65141378361_atchromodomain helicase DNA−7.320.000000.00039−0.730.60−1.6614binding protein 7 (predicted)1378453_at−4.840.000110.00938−0.740.60−1.66141378504_atInsulin-like growth factor I−5.410.000030.00440−0.960.51−1.9514mRNA, 3′ end of mRNA1378786_atTranscribed locus, weakly4.890.000100.008790.331.251.2514similar to NP_780607.2hypothetical proteinLOC109050 [Mus musculus]1379062_atsimilar to Expressed sequence−6.600.000000.00090−1.080.47−2.1214AU0198231379073_atSimilar to RIKEN cDNA−5.510.000030.00394−0.490.71−1.40142310067G051379101_atDEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box−5.550.000020.00375−0.870.55−1.8214polypeptide 36 (predicted)1379112_atAT rich interactive domain 4A−5.700.000020.00299−0.440.74−1.3514(Rbp1 like) (predicted)1379232_atTBC1D12: TBC1 domain−6.980.000000.00056−1.400.38−2.6314family, member 12 (predicted)1379330_s_atCDNA clone IMAGE: 7316839−4.800.000120.00967−0.360.78−1.28141379332_atTranscribed locus, strongly−4.880.000100.00886−0.610.66−1.5214similar to XP_417265.1PREDICTED: similar to F-box-WD40 repeat protein 6[Gallus gallus]1379399_atsimilar to cDNA sequence−5.370.000030.00459−0.420.75−1.3414BC016188 (predicted)1379457_atneural precursor cell expressed,−5.390.000030.00449−0.560.68−1.4814developmentally down-regulated gene 1 (predicted)1379469_atsimilar to transducin (beta)-like−6.230.000010.00153−0.910.53−1.88141 X-linked1379485_ateukaryotic translation initiation−7.080.000000.00050−1.680.31−3.2114factor 3, subunit 10 (theta)(predicted)1379571_atplakophilin 4 (predicted)−5.420.000030.00436−0.740.60−1.67141379578_atsimilar to Zbtb20 protein−8.890.000000.00006−0.710.61−1.63141379662_a_atSNF related kinase4.930.000090.008290.361.291.29141379715_atsimilar to CG9346-PA−4.930.000090.00829−0.710.61−1.6314(predicted)1379826_atsimilar to hypothetical protein−5.950.000010.00208−0.620.65−1.5414MGC319671380008_atsimilar to Neurofilament triplet−5.110.000060.00645−0.600.66−1.5214H protein (200 kDaneurofilament protein)(Neurofilament heavypolypeptide) (NF-H)(predicted)1380060_atDNA topoisomerase I,−5.230.000050.00566−0.530.69−1.4414mitochondrial1380062_atmembrane protein,−6.880.000000.00065−0.750.59−1.6814palmitoylated 6 (MAGUK p55subfamily member 6)(predicted)1380166_atSimilar to hypothetical protein5.630.000020.003330.341.271.2714FLJ120561380371_atdelangin (predicted)−9.370.000000.00005−0.940.52−1.91141380446_atmyeloid/lymphoid or mixed-−5.000.000080.00756−0.620.65−1.5414lineage leukemia (trithoraxhomolog, Drosophila);translocated to, 10 (predicted)1380503_athypothetical LOC305452−6.070.000010.00178−0.620.65−1.5314(predicted)1380728_atSimilar to collapsin response6.090.000010.001780.491.411.4114mediator protein-2A1381469_a_atPERQ amino acid rich, with−5.490.000030.00405−0.510.70−1.4314GYF domain 1 (predicted)1381525_at−4.820.000120.00952−0.410.75−1.33141381542_atUBX domain containing 2−6.150.000010.00171−0.830.56−1.7814(predicted)1381548_atgolgi phosphoprotein 4−5.810.000010.00256−0.690.62−1.6114(predicted)1381567_athypothetical LOC2943904.970.000080.008000.361.291.2914(predicted)1381764_s_atring finger protein 126−5.540.000020.00382−0.510.70−1.4214(predicted)1381809_atankyrin repeat domain 11−5.940.000010.00209−1.110.46−2.1714(predicted)1381829_at−6.270.000000.00145−1.070.48−2.10141381878_atubinuclein 1 (predicted)−5.820.000010.00252−1.180.44−2.26141381958_atsimilar to mKIAA0259 protein−6.900.000000.00062−1.270.41−2.42141382000_at4.820.000120.009500.411.331.33141382009_atTranscribed locus−5.390.000030.00449−0.690.62−1.62141382027_atLOC498010−6.280.000000.00144−0.760.59−1.70141382056_atsimilar to splicing factor p54−8.130.000000.00016−0.970.51−1.96141382109_atnuclear NF-kappaB activating−5.830.000010.00250−0.620.65−1.5314protein1382155_at6.370.000000.001260.581.501.50141382193_atTranscribed locus−6.070.000010.00178−1.420.37−2.67141382306_atAriadne ubiquitin-conjugating6.590.000000.000900.591.501.5014enzyme E2 binding proteinhomolog 1 (Drosophila)(predicted)1382307_atprotein phosphatase 1,−4.790.000130.00976−0.470.72−1.3914regulatory (inhibitor) subunit12A1382358_atSimilar to SRY (sex−5.340.000040.00482−0.650.64−1.5714determining region Y)-box 5isoform a1382372_atAryl hydrocarbon receptor−5.070.000070.00680−0.740.60−1.67141382430_atsimilar to KIAA1585 protein−5.620.000020.00338−0.580.67−1.5014(predicted)1382434_atectonucleoside triphosphate−5.890.000010.00229−0.730.60−1.6614diphosphohydrolase 51382466_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−5.430.000030.00433−0.980.51−1.97146530403A03 (predicted)1382551_atsimilar to Intersectin 2 (SH3−6.720.000000.00080−1.410.38−2.6714domain-containing protein 1B)(SH3P18) (SH3P18-likeWASP associated protein)1382558_attranscription factor 3−6.130.000010.00171−0.620.65−1.5414(predicted)1382573_atTranscribed locus5.080.000070.006770.381.301.30141382584_atsimilar to mKIAA1321 protein−7.220.000000.00042−1.150.45−2.22141382620_atankyrin repeat domain 11−9.690.000000.00003−0.950.52−1.9314(predicted)1382797_atsimilar to 1500019C06Rik−5.020.000080.00742−0.470.72−1.3914protein1382813_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−5.360.000040.00467−0.460.73−1.38144930444A02 (predicted)1382862_atTranscribed locus−6.230.000010.00153−1.160.45−2.23141382904_atsimilar to hypothetical protein−9.040.000000.00005−0.850.56−1.8014DKFZp434K1421 (predicted)1382935_atsimilar to Hypothetical protein−6.540.000000.00097−0.640.64−1.5614KIAA01411382939_attranslocated promoter region−5.180.000050.00581−1.130.46−2.1914(predicted)1382957_atsimilar to cisplatin resistance-−8.040.000000.00016−1.080.47−2.1114associated overexpressedprotein (predicted)1382960_atTranscribed locus−5.950.000010.00208−0.770.59−1.70141382972_atTranscribed locus, strongly5.170.000050.005950.371.291.2914similar to XP_226713.2PREDICTED: similar to Src-associated protein SAW[Rattus norvegicus]1383008_atSMC4 structural maintenance−5.190.000050.00581−0.980.51−1.9714of chromosomes 4-like 1(yeast) (predicted)1383040_a_at−5.460.000030.00419−0.470.72−1.38141383052_a_at−6.540.000000.00097−0.620.65−1.53141383054_at−7.860.000000.00019−0.760.59−1.70141383060_atG kinase anchoring protein 1−5.820.000010.00255−0.440.74−1.3514(predicted)1383085_atSimilar to Sh3bgrl protein−5.200.000050.00576−0.860.55−1.81141383179_atSimilar to hypothetical protein−5.100.000060.00660−0.750.60−1.6814HSPC129 (predicted)1383184_atzinc and ring finger 15.030.000070.007310.391.311.3114(predicted)1383334_atTranscribed locus−5.370.000030.00461−0.460.73−1.37141383455_atglutamyl-prolyl-tRNA−6.800.000000.00072−0.720.61−1.6514synthetase (predicted)1383535_atankyrin repeat and SOCS box-6.240.000010.001520.381.301.3014containing protein 8 (predicted)1383615_a_atsimilar to HECT domain−6.060.000010.00178−1.080.47−2.1114containing 11383687_at−5.400.000030.00441−0.430.74−1.34141383776_atTranscribed locus6.410.000000.001200.621.541.54141383786_atTranscribed locus−5.130.000060.00628−0.500.71−1.41141383825_atradixin−9.200.000000.00005−1.010.50−2.01141383827_attousled-like kinase 1−6.090.000010.00178−1.250.42−2.3714(predicted)1384125_atmyeloid/lymphoid or mixed-−5.970.000010.00202−0.510.70−1.4214lineage leukemia 5 (trithoraxhomolog, Drosophila)(predicted)1384131_atADP-ribosylation factor-like 66.100.000010.001760.701.631.6314interacting protein 2 (predicted)1384146_atSimilar to CD69 antigen (p60,−5.220.000050.00568−1.350.39−2.5514early T-cell activation antigen)1384154_atWW domain binding protein 4−5.330.000040.00483−0.520.70−1.43141384260_atTranscribed locus−6.360.000000.00126−0.660.63−1.58141384263_atATP-binding cassette, sub-−7.270.000000.00040−0.720.61−1.6414family A (ABC1), member 13(predicted)similar to hypothetical proteinMGC33214 (predicted)1384339_s_atcasein kinase II, alpha 1−8.810.000000.00006−1.830.28−3.5614polypeptide1384376_atsimilar to FLJ14281 protein−5.420.000030.00436−0.650.64−1.57141384394_at−7.210.000000.00042−0.610.65−1.53141384609_a_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−6.610.000000.00090−0.910.53−1.8714B230380D07 (predicted)1384766_a_atsimilar to PHD finger protein−5.180.000050.00581−0.700.61−1.631414 isoform 11384791_atUDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-−5.080.000060.00671−0.750.60−1.68141,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase1 (predicted)1384792_atformin binding protein 3−6.700.000000.00082−0.970.51−1.9614(predicted)1384857_atA kinase (PRKA) anchor−5.620.000020.00338−1.050.48−2.0714protein (yotiao) 91385006_atalpha thalassemia/mental−4.940.000090.00829−0.450.73−1.3714retardation syndrome X-linkedhomolog (human)1385038_atsimilar to hedgehog-interacting−9.940.000000.00003−0.800.57−1.7514protein1385076_at−5.780.000010.00271−0.570.68−1.48141385077_atsimilar to golgi-specific−7.830.000000.00019−1.050.48−2.0714brefeldin A-resistance guaninenucleotide exchange factor 1(predicted)1385101_a_atUnknown (protein for−5.530.000020.00383−0.970.51−1.9614MGC: 73017)1385108_atTranscribed locus−4.830.000110.00946−1.270.42−2.40141385240_atWD repeat domain 33−4.810.000120.00958−0.930.52−1.9114(predicted)1385320_atsimilar to Pdz-containing−5.260.000040.00530−0.470.72−1.3814protein1385407_atTCDD-inducible poly(ADP-−5.460.000030.00417−1.340.39−2.5414ribose) polymerase (predicted)1385408_atsimilar to mKIAA0518 protein−5.860.000010.00236−1.310.40−2.49141385689_atTranscribed locus−4.830.000110.00948−0.680.62−1.60141385852_atCREB binding protein−4.850.000110.00927−0.530.69−1.4414hypothetical gene supported byNM_1333811385931_athook homolog 3−7.300.000000.00040−1.660.32−3.16141385999_atYME1-like 1 (S. cerevisiae)−4.800.000120.00964−0.630.64−1.55141386191_a_atTranscribed locus5.220.000050.005680.461.371.37141386641_atTranscribed locus−5.410.000030.00440−0.970.51−1.95141386793_atsimilar to zinc finger protein 61−5.280.000040.00514−0.590.66−1.51141387087_atCCAAT/enhancer binding−5.430.000030.00435−0.610.66−1.5214protein (C/EBP), beta1387306_a_atearly growth response 24.820.000120.009500.331.261.26141387365_atnuclear receptor subfamily 1,−4.860.000110.00913−0.350.78−1.2714group H, member 31387415_a_atsyntaxin binding protein 54.860.000110.009130.401.321.3214(tomosyn)1387458_atring finger protein 47.050.000000.000510.751.691.69141387664_atATPase, H+ transporting, V15.550.000020.003750.461.381.3814subunit B, isoform 21387757_atliver regeneration p-53 related5.190.000050.005810.511.421.4214protein1387760_a_atone cut domain, family−6.120.000010.00171−1.580.34−2.9814member 11387789_atv-ets erythroblastosis virus E26−6.610.000000.00090−0.580.67−1.5014oncogene like (avian)1387915_atRatsg2−4.790.000130.00976−0.330.79−1.26141387947_atv-maf musculoaponeurotic−5.080.000070.00674−0.800.57−1.7414fibrosarcoma oncogene family,protein B (avian)1388022_a_atdynamin 1-like4.950.000090.008110.431.351.35141388059_a_atsolute carrier family 115.750.000010.002800.431.351.3514(proton-coupled divalent metalion transporters), member 21388089_a_atring finger protein 45.730.000020.002890.501.411.41141388157_atmyristoylated alanine rich−5.760.000010.00276−0.510.70−1.4314protein kinase C substrate1388196_atNCK-associated protein 15.310.000040.005000.481.401.40141388251_atprotein kinase C, lambda5.210.000050.005710.551.471.47141388313_atribosomal protein s25−4.830.000110.00946−0.630.65−1.54141388353_atproliferation-associated 2G4,−6.350.000000.00127−0.670.63−1.591438 kDa1388388_atProtein phosphatase 2,−5.320.000040.00487−0.410.75−1.3314regulatory subunit B (B56),delta isoform (predicted)1388396_atserine/threonine kinase 25−5.490.000030.00404−0.340.79−1.2714(STE20 homolog, yeast)1388503_atsimilar to CREBBP/EP300−6.060.000010.00178−0.400.76−1.3214inhibitory protein 11388714_atelongation factor RNA−5.880.000010.00229−0.460.73−1.3714polymerase II (predicted)1388735_atSimilar to keratin associated4.840.000110.009450.501.411.4114protein 10-61388752_atBCL2-associated transcription−4.810.000120.00958−0.400.76−1.3214factor 1 (predicted)1388849_atProtease, serine, 25 (predicted)−5.970.000010.00202−0.500.71−1.41141388888_atTranscribed locus5.130.000060.006320.401.321.32141389268_atsimilar to DNA polymerase−5.210.000050.00571−0.370.77−1.2914lambda1389307_atsimilar to Amyloid beta (A4)−4.910.000100.00854−0.490.71−1.4014precursor-like protein 11389419_atTranscribed locus−6.540.000000.00097−1.300.40−2.47141389432_atpre-B-cell leukemia−4.930.000090.00829−0.550.69−1.4614transcription factor 21389444_atTranscribed locus−6.840.000000.00068−1.060.48−2.09141389806_atTranscribed locus−7.630.000000.00026−0.540.69−1.46141389868_atsimilar to RCK−6.340.000000.00128−1.470.36−2.76141389963_atP55 mRNA for p55 protein−5.540.000020.00378−0.440.74−1.35141389986_atLOC499304−5.390.000030.00449−2.570.17−5.93141389989_atalpha thalassemia/mental−4.930.000090.00829−0.540.69−1.4514retardation syndrome X-linkedhomolog (human)1389998_atNuclear receptor subfamily 2,−6.030.000010.00187−0.690.62−1.6114group F, member 21390048_atserine/arginine repetitive−5.810.000010.00256−1.040.49−2.0514matrix 2 (predicted)1390120_a_atring finger protein 1−5.700.000020.00299−0.360.78−1.28141390121_atGLIS family zinc finger 24.810.000120.009580.431.341.3414(predicted)1390227_atCDNA clone IMAGE: 7300848−5.910.000010.00219−1.030.49−2.04141390360_a_atsimilar to Safb2 protein−4.790.000130.00976−0.480.72−1.39141390410_atTranscribed locus−4.790.000120.00973−0.490.71−1.40141390436_atAutophagy 7-like (S. cerevisiae)−7.880.000000.00019−1.460.36−2.7614(predicted)1390448_atsimilar to 1110065L07Rik5.080.000070.006740.321.251.2514protein (predicted)1390454_at4-nitrophenylphosphatase−5.470.000030.00415−0.410.75−1.3314domain and non-neuronalSNAP25-like protein homolog1 (C. elegans) (predicted)1390576_atTranscribed locus−5.100.000060.00660−0.670.63−1.59141390660_atT-box 2 (predicted)5.010.000080.007520.401.321.32141390706_atspectrin beta 2−5.550.000020.00376−0.710.61−1.64141390739_atsimilar to zinc finger protein−5.510.000030.00395−0.520.70−1.4314609similar to zinc finger protein6091390777_atsterol-C5-desaturase (fungal−6.590.000000.00090−0.700.61−1.6314ERG3, delta-5-desaturase)homolog (S. cerevisae)1390779_atSimilar to phosphoseryl-tRNA−4.860.000110.00913−0.640.64−1.5614kinase1390813_atSimilar to RNA-binding−5.190.000050.00581−0.620.65−1.5414protein Musashi2-S1390884_a_atUDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-4.870.000100.009040.491.401.40141,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase7 (predicted)1391021_atsimilar to KIAA1749 protein−7.550.000000.00027−0.740.60−1.6714(predicted)1391170_atsimilar to mKIAA1757 protein−9.210.000000.00005−2.010.25−4.0414(predicted)1391222_atsimilar to Nedd4 binding−5.910.000010.00219−0.810.57−1.7614protein 1 (predicted)1391297_atREST corepressor 1 (predicted)−5.170.000050.00595−0.920.53−1.89141391578_at−8.480.000000.00009−1.110.46−2.15141391584_atTranscribed locus6.040.000010.001850.451.371.37141391625_atWiskott-Aldrich syndrome-like−10.520.000000.00002−1.280.41−2.4314(human)1391669_atprotein tyrosine phosphatase,−6.210.000010.00156−0.820.56−1.7714receptor type, B (predicted)1391689_atsimilar to Retinoblastoma-−9.060.000000.00005−1.200.44−2.3014binding protein 2 (RBBP-2)1391701_atMYST histone−5.180.000050.00581−0.980.51−1.9714acetyltransferase (monocyticleukemia) 3 (predicted)1391743_atELAV (embryonic lethal,−4.800.000120.00964−1.360.39−2.5814abnormal vision, Drosophila)-like 1 (Hu antigen R)(predicted)1391830_atcopine VIII (predicted)−5.220.000050.00568−1.080.47−2.12141391838_atankyrin repeat domain 11−7.810.000000.00019−1.150.45−2.2314(predicted)1391848_atRNA binding motif protein 27−7.020.000000.00053−0.760.59−1.7014(predicted)1391968_atSimilar to expressed sequence−4.890.000100.00883−0.690.62−1.6214AA4158171392000_atSimilar to PHD finger protein5.010.000080.007420.451.371.371414 isoform 11392061_atminichromosome maintenance5.340.000040.004820.541.461.4614deficient 10 (S. cerevisiae)(predicted)1392269_attranscriptional regulator,−6.230.000010.00153−1.130.46−2.1914SIN3A (yeast) (predicted)1392277_at−7.290.000000.00040−0.480.72−1.40141392322_atGTPase, IMAP family member 7−4.830.000120.00948−0.290.82−1.22141392472_atsimilar to myocyte enhancer−9.770.000000.00003−0.880.54−1.8414factor 2C1392552_atsimilar to transcription−6.150.000010.00169−0.960.51−1.9514repressor p66 (predicted)1392564_atmyeloid/lymphoid or mixed-−6.130.000010.00171−0.570.68−1.4814lineage leukemia 5 (trithoraxhomolog, Drosophila)(predicted)1392629_a_atsimilar to MADP-1 protein−4.930.000090.00829−0.820.57−1.7714(predicted)1392738_atsimilar to KIAA1096 protein−5.880.000010.00231−0.750.59−1.68141392825_atLOC499256−5.200.000050.00580−0.930.53−1.90141392864_atRho GTPase activating protein−8.050.000000.00016−1.370.39−2.58145 (predicted)1392932_atleukocyte receptor cluster−4.810.000120.00958−0.790.58−1.7314(LRC) member 8 (predicted)1392936_atsimilar to RNA binding motif−4.820.000120.00950−0.880.54−1.8514protein 251392984_atcopine III (predicted)−7.830.000000.00019−0.950.52−1.93141393151_at5.030.000070.007260.651.571.57141393226_atTranscribed locus−4.940.000090.00828−0.730.60−1.66141393290_atsimilar to myocyte enhancer−5.650.000020.00327−0.500.71−1.4214factor 2C1393322_atTAF15 RNA polymerase II,−6.180.000010.00162−1.000.50−2.0014TATA box binding protein(TBP)-associated factor(predicted)1393378_at−5.720.000020.00293−0.520.70−1.43141393443_a_atsimilar to CGI-112 protein−5.330.000040.00483−0.470.72−1.3914(predicted)1393505_x_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−7.600.000000.00026−0.690.62−1.6114B230380D07 (predicted)1393511_atsimilar to galactose-3-O-5.100.000060.006550.411.331.3314sulfotransferase 41393560_at−4.910.000100.00852−0.510.70−1.42141393576_atTranscribed locus−4.820.000120.00950−0.620.65−1.54141393593_atsimilar to KIAA0597 protein5.430.000030.004350.571.481.48141393639_atmyosin X (predicted)−4.950.000090.00811−0.590.67−1.50141393790_atHRAS-like suppressor5.440.000030.004320.441.351.3514(predicted)1393798_atalpha thalassemia/mental−5.000.000080.00757−0.840.56−1.7914retardation syndrome X-linkedhomolog (human)1393804_atsimilar to hypothetical protein−6.790.000000.00073−0.850.56−1.8014FLJ22490 (predicted)1393809_atTnf receptor-associated factor 6−8.480.000000.00009−0.900.53−1.8714(predicted)1393811_atsimilar to putative repair and−6.080.000010.00178−0.790.58−1.7314recombination helicaseRAD26L1393910_atsimilar to Fam13a1 protein−4.850.000110.00921−0.810.57−1.7514(predicted)1393981_atsimilar to KIAA0423−5.240.000050.00556−0.570.68−1.4814(predicted)1394003_atsimilar to DNA polymerase−5.590.000020.00349−0.590.67−1.5014epsilon p17 subunit (DNApolymerase epsilon subunit 3)(Chromatin accessibilitycomplex 17) (HuCHRAC17)(CHRAC-17)1394220_atSimilar to hypothetical protein5.460.000030.004170.431.341.3414(predicted)1394243_atsimilar to spermine synthase−6.110.000010.00175−0.600.66−1.51141394436_atsperm associated antigen 9−6.600.000000.00090−0.910.53−1.8814(predicted)1394497_atsimilar to TCF7L2 protein−8.030.000000.00016−1.060.48−2.08141394594_atTranscribed locus5.090.000060.006710.421.341.34141394715_atDicer1, Dcr-1 homolog5.140.000060.006270.541.461.4614(Drosophila) (predicted)1394740_at5.410.000030.004400.521.431.43141394742_atTranscribed locus−5.730.000020.00289−0.980.51−1.98141394746_athect (homologous to the E6-AP−7.320.000000.00039−0.940.52−1.9114(UBE3A) carboxyl terminus)domain and RCC1 (CHC1)-likedomain (RLD) 1 (predicted)1394814_attranslocated promoter region−6.130.000010.00171−0.630.64−1.5514(predicted)1394849_atTranscribed locus−5.220.000050.00569−1.610.33−3.05141394865_atTransmembrane protein 7−7.850.000000.00019−0.920.53−1.9014(predicted)1394965_atenthoprotin5.300.000040.005030.401.321.32141394969_atTranscribed locus5.400.000030.004410.391.311.31141394985_atearly endosome antigen 1−7.600.000000.00026−1.000.50−2.0014(predicted)1395211_s_atsupervillin (predicted)−8.740.000000.00007−0.980.51−1.97141395237_ateukaryotic translation initiation−8.310.000000.00012−0.870.55−1.8314factor 5B1395264_atsimilar to Rap1-interacting−6.850.000000.00067−0.950.52−1.9314factor 11395331_atsimilar to hypothetical protein4.840.000110.009450.311.241.2414CL25084 (predicted)1395338_atleucine-rich PPR-motif5.240.000050.005550.751.681.6814containing (predicted)1395516_atsimilar to hypothetical protein−4.890.000100.00883−0.590.66−1.5114FLJ10154 (predicted)1395565_atCOP9 signalosome subunit 45.550.000020.003760.401.321.32141395610_atsimilar to Hypothetical protein5.660.000020.003250.331.261.2614MGC307141395616_atsimilar to Ab2-008 (predicted)−5.030.000070.00729−0.500.71−1.42141395625_atTranscribed locus−6.030.000010.00187−0.760.59−1.70141395739_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA5.050.000070.006980.541.461.4614C920006C10 (predicted)1395814_atTranscribed locus−5.090.000060.00663−0.780.58−1.71141395976_atsimilar to phosphoinositol 4-−6.370.000000.00126−0.570.67−1.4914phosphate adaptor protein-21395981_athelicase, ATP binding 1−5.760.000010.00276−0.620.65−1.5414(predicted)1396036_atRal GEF with PH domain and−6.670.000000.00084−1.040.49−2.0614SH3 binding motif 2(predicted)1396063_atDEK oncogene (DNA binding)−4.820.000120.00952−0.630.65−1.55141396100_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−5.150.000060.00610−0.560.68−1.47142010009L17 (predicted)1396170_atWW domain binding protein 4−7.780.000000.00020−0.770.59−1.71141396187_atHypothetical protein5.140.000060.006220.511.431.4314LOC6062941396202_atTranscribed locus4.970.000080.007950.521.441.44141396403_at−9.070.000000.00005−1.010.50−2.02141396803_atsimilar to THO complex 2−7.090.000000.00050−0.900.54−1.86141397203_atPRP4 pre-mRNA processing−6.180.000010.00162−0.670.63−1.5914factor 4 homolog B (yeast)(predicted)1397234_atG patch domain containing 1−5.650.000020.00326−0.490.71−1.4014(predicted)1397367_atA disintegrin and5.050.000070.006980.471.381.3814metalloprotease domain 23(predicted)1397508_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−5.080.000060.00671−0.620.65−1.54142310005B101397552_atechinoderm microtubule−8.470.000000.00009−1.390.38−2.6214associated protein like 4(predicted)1397627_atdiaphanous homolog 1−5.070.000070.00680−0.520.70−1.4314(Drosophila) (predicted)1397647_atsolute carrier family 255.510.000030.003950.621.541.5414(mitochondrial carrier;ornithine transporter) member15 (predicted)1397669_atChemokine (C—C motif)5.780.000010.002710.511.431.4314receptor 6 (predicted)1397674_ateukaryotic translation initiation−6.440.000000.00116−0.760.59−1.6914factor 3, subunit 8, 110 kDa(predicted)1397676_atSimilar to osteoclast inhibitory−6.680.000000.00084−1.340.39−2.5414lectin1397758_atSimilar to choline−4.830.000110.00946−0.380.77−1.3014phosphotransferase 1;cholinephosphotransferase 1alpha;cholinephosphotransferase 11397959_atsimilar to RIKEN cDNA−6.390.000000.00123−1.140.45−2.2014D130059P03 gene (predicted)1398311_a_atkinase D-interacting substance5.140.000060.006270.441.361.36142201398351_atUbiquitin specific protease 7−5.600.000020.00349−0.420.75−1.3414(herpes virus-associated)(predicted)1398420_atSimilar to E3 ubiquitin ligase−5.330.000040.00483−0.940.52−1.9214SMURF2 (predicted)1398436_atubiquitin specific protease 42−6.360.000000.00126−0.760.59−1.6914(predicted)1398486_atCDNA clone MGC: 93990−8.090.000000.00016−1.530.35−2.8914IMAGE: 71153811398522_atsimilar to Ab2-034 (predicted)−4.920.000090.00832−0.510.70−1.42141398553_atsimilar to CGI-100-like protein−6.910.000000.00062−1.680.31−3.20141398834_atmitogen activated protein−4.940.000090.00828−0.320.80−1.2514kinase kinase 21398926_atprefoldin 1 (predicted)−5.950.000010.00208−0.480.72−1.40141398963_atTAF10 RNA polymerase II,−5.420.000030.00436−0.410.75−1.3314TATA box binding protein(TBP)-associated factor(predicted)1399099_atheterogeneous nuclear−4.940.000090.00829−0.540.69−1.4614ribonucleoprotein U-like 1(predicted)1399140_atTranscribed locus−5.160.000050.00597−0.490.71−1.4014AFFX-BioB-Biotin synthase−4.890.000100.00879−0.640.64−1.5614M_atbiotin synthesis, sulfurinsertion?AFFX-dethiobiotin synthetase−4.920.000090.00834−0.700.62−1.6214BioDn-5_atAFFX-r2-Ec-dethiobiotin synthetase−5.410.000030.00440−0.510.70−1.4314bioD-5_at


EXAMPLE 3

The effect of dietary supplementation of omega-3 phospholipids for 12 weeks on cognitive function, quality of life and behavioral outcome in children with ADHD have been investigated. Four children with ADHD were recruited, 2 children received a placebo (olive oil), 1 child received omega-3 phospholipids (700 mg/day, EPA:DHA=2:1) and the last child received omega-3 phospholipids (350 mg/day, EPA:DHA=2:1). Inclusion criteria were age (8-12 years), diagnosis of ADHD according to DSM-IV criteria, exhibiting symptoms of essential fatty acid deficiency and permission from parent/guardian. Exclusion criteria were use of dietary supplement containing omega-3 or omega-6 in the previous 6 months, consuming more than 2 fish meals per week, receiving medical treatment for a major health condition such as diabetes, depression or having a bleeding disorder. At baseline, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks the child's cognitive ability was measured using computerized cognitive tests from Cogstate (Melbourne, Australia) as well as the conventional cognitive test from TEA-Ch [45] and WASI (Wechshler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence) [46]. The parent/guardian completed a World Health Organization-Quality of life questionnaire [33], symptoms check list, BRIEF (Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function) [47] and Conners' rating scale-revised (SCR-R) [48]. For each subject at each assessment, an average of the standardized scores was computed. The results are shown in FIG. 1, showing an improvement of the cognitive performance for the children receiving omega-3 phospholipids compared to baseline. None of the children receiving placebo completed the trial.


EXAMPLE 4

The effect of dietary supplementation of omega-3 phospholipids for 12 weeks on cognitive function, quality of life and behavioral outcome in healthy children was investigated. 20 children was recruited 10 children received placebo (olive oil) and 10 children received omega-3 phospholipids (700 mg omega-3/day, EPA:DHA=2:1). Inclusion criteria were male and female age 8-12 years and permission from parent/guardian. Exclusion criteria were use of omega-3 and omega-6 dietary supplement, consuming more than 2 meals of fish per week, receiving medical treatment for any major health conditions such as diabetes, history of traumatic brain injury, symptoms on ADHD according to DSM-IV criteria and bleeding disorders. At baseline, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks the child's cognitive ability was measured using computerized cognitive tests from Cogstate (Melbourne, Australia) as well as the conventional cognitive test from TEA-Ch [45] and Weschler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence (WASI) [46]. The parent/guardian completed a World Health Organization-Quality of life questionnaire [33], symptoms check list, BRIEF (Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function) [47] and Conners' rating scale-revised (SCR-R) [48]. For each subject at each assessment, an average of the standardized scores was computed. The results are shown in FIG. 2, showing an improvement of the cognitive performance for the healthy children receiving omega-3 phospholipids compared to both placebo and baseline. One of the subjects was removed from the data set due to poor response. 3 children did not follow through the study after the initial baseline assessment.


EXAMPLE 5

Fish oil (TG oil) were obtained from BLT (Aalesund, Norway) and EPA-rich phospholipids (PL 1) or DHA rich phospholipids (PL 2) were prepared according to the method disclosed in example 1. Next, the TAG and the phospholipids were mixed with the rat feed AIN-93 (without soybean oil). The concentration of EPA, DHA and 18:3 n-3 in the different diets can be seen in the table below (table 2).

TABLE 3Amount of different fatty acid in the final feed products (g/100 g feed).g/100 gg/100 gg/100 gSUM g/100 gEPADHA18:3n3EPA + DHA + 18:3n3ControlT4000.260.26TG OilT10.610.390.241.23PL 1T20.610.350.261.22PL 2T30.240.730.261.23


Thirty six newly weaned male Sprague Dawley rats (start weight 168±11 g) were used in the experiment. The rats were initially given low-essential oil rat feed, containing 20 g of sunflower oil and 10 g of flaxseed oil per kg of feed, for one week. After the first week, modified AIN-93 diet powder without the test oil was given to rats ad libitum until the start of the experiment. The experiment lasted for 30 days and the rats consumed the diets in table 3 ad libitum. However, before sampling feeding was stopped for 12 hours. Each rat was then individually anaesthetized with carbon dioxide, weighed and euthanized with cervical dislocation. The brain was then surgically removed from the rats and the fatty acid profiles of the total lipids (table 4), the phospholipids (table 5) and phospholipids sn-2 position (table 6) were determined using GC-FID and/or LC-MS.

TABLE 4Fatty acid profile of the total lipids isolated from the rat brain (mmol/g lipids).18:118:218:3 n320:3ARAEPA22:422:5 n622:5 n3DHATG-oil370120.355.7153.72.268.55.65.0191.4PL-1399120.337.2160.72.270.27.25.7203.3PL-2345130.335.7141.61.760.85.83.4190.3Control363120.305.2174.90.181.47.61.7189.6









TABLE 5










Fatty acid profile of the phospholipids isolated from the brain (mmol/g lipids).


















18:1
18:2
18:3 n3
20:3
ARA
EPA
22:4
22:5 n6
22:5 n3
DHA





















TG-oil
260.8
9.9
0.2
4.5
147.17
1.9
72.8
5.6
5.3
196.8


PL-1
289.9
10.9
0.1
4.2
115.07
1.4
54.7
4.3
4.5
170.1


PL-2
232.6
2.1

4.2
122.38
1.2
57.4
4.4
0.7
175.9


Control
288.8
4.4
0.6
3.5
181.60
0.1
86.8
7.3
0.5
213.1
















TABLE 6










The fatty acid profile for the SN-2 position of the phospholipids


in the brain (mmol/g lipids).















sn-2
EPA
DHA
ARA
18:2
22:5
20:3
22:4
18:1


















TG-oil
1.6
164.7
123.6
9.8
5.0
3.9
72.8
197.4


PL-1
1.3
146.3
96.5
11.6
3.7
4.1
51.8
260.2


PL-2
1.2
173.5
120.3
3.2
4.4
4.2
57.4
223.4


Control
0.1
203.0
171.6
4.4
7.1
3.2
81.1
258.4









The results show that a significant decrease in arachidonic acid can be found in the phospholipids in the brain (including sn-2 position) after intake of omega-3 phospholipids. DHA levels in both total lipids and phospholipids were not influenced by the omega-3 diets, while there was a small but significant increase in EPA levels. This reduction of ARA may be important as it affects the inflammatory response in the tissue, especially in pathologies were inflammation of the brain is a fundamental component such as cognitive dysfunction.


EXAMPLE 5

A dose-finding study aimed to investigate the effect of three dose levels (13 mg/kg, 26 mg/kg and 52 mg/kg) of the omega-3 rich phospholipids on visuospatial memory in aged beagle dogs was performed. 18 beagle dogs of age 7 years were recruited with the absence of any clinical symptoms that could affect the objectives of the study, as determined by a veterinarian. The variable measured at baseline and after 4 week were cognition as measured by the delayed non-matching-to position task (DNMP) [44]. Electroretinography (ERG) is an electrophysical technique which measures the retinal action potentials in response to light stimulation and is used to assess retinal function [49]. DNMP is a test of working memory performance and subjects will receive 10 trials daily. During the baseline phase, all subjects was given 5 cognitive test sessions on a DNMP, which provided a means of assessing visuospatial working memory and establish baseline performance levels on the spatial memory test. The baseline cognitive test performance was then used to assign animals into three cognitively equivalents groups of 6 animals per group. Each trial of the DNMP task consists of two phases. In the sample, or presentation phase, a red block is presented to the subject over one of three food wells. The subject is required to displace the block and retrieve the food in the well below the block. The block is then removed from view of the subject and a delay is initiated. At the end of the delay, the choice phase begins in which subject is presented with two identical blocks; one over the initial well and a second over one of the two remaining wells. Subjects are required to respond to the novel position to obtain the food reward. A 30-s inter-trial interval will be used to separate each trial. For the present study, all DNMP testing will consist of variable-delayed testing in which delays of 20 or 90 s will occur equally over the 10 daily test trials. The results show an improvement in cognitive function in the aged beagle dogs (FIG. 3), especially for the low (13 mg/kg) and intermediate (26 mg/kg) dose using the short delay test. For the long delay test, an improvement was observed for the low dose (13 mg/kg), whereas a reduction of cognitive performance was observed for the high dose (52 mg/kg).


The ERG's were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA's for both response latency and response amplitude. Each analysis looked at a single variable, with baseline and treatment conditions serving as a within subject variable and dose as a between subject variable. Each of the following 10 variables were examined 1) A wave scotopic at 0 log intensity, 2) A wave scotopic at 1.2 log intensity, 3) A wave photopic at 0 log intensity, 4) A wave photopic at 1.2 log intensity, 5) B wave scotopic at −3 log intensity, 6) B wave scotopic at 1 log intensity, 7) B wave scotopic at 1.2 log intensity and 8) B wave scotopic at 30 hz frequency.


Statistically significant treatment effects in response amplitude were observed in the scotopic response in the B wave at the 0 log (p=0.02) and in the 1.2 log response (p=0.0007). The response at −3 log was marginally significant (p=0.06). These results reflect larger responses under the treatment condition than baseline. The largest effects were observed at the low and high dose. The results also revealed a significant n increase in the amplitude of the scoptopic response to the A wave at 1 and 1.2 log intensities, the treatment effect achieved statistical significance (p=0.04 and p=0.007 respectively). These changes reflected shorter onset latency in the medium dose group.


Having now fully described this invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the same can be performed within a wide range of equivalent parameters, concentrations, and conditions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention and without undue experimentation.


While this invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications. This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth.


REFERENCES



  • [1] Doig S and Diks R M M. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 105 (2003) 359.

  • [2] Adlercreutz P, Lyberg A M and Adlercreutz D. Eu. J Lipid. Sci Technol 105 (2003) 638.

  • [3] Peng L, Xu X, Mu H, Høy C E and Adler-Nissen J. Enzyme Microb Technol 31 (2002) 532.

  • [4] Haraldsson G G and Thorarensen A, JAOCS 75 (1999) 1143.

  • [5] Guo Z, Vikbjerg A F and Xu X. Biotech Adv. 23 (2005) 203.

  • [6] US 20040234587.

  • [7] U.S. Pat. No. 6,036,992.

  • [8] U.S. Pat. No. 5,434,183.

  • [9] U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,747.

  • [10] US 20050130937.

  • [11] Lemaitre-Delaunay D, Pachiaudi C, Laville M, Pousin J, Armstrong M and Lagarde M. J Lipid Res. 40 (1999) 1867.

  • [12] Wijendran V, Huang M, Diau G, Boehm G, Nathanielsz P W and Brenna J T. Pediatr. Res. 51 (2002) 365.

  • [13] Calder P. Nutr. Res. 24 (2004) 361.

  • [14] Wainwright, P. Br J Nutr. 83 (2000) 337.

  • [15] Waldron M K, Spencer A L, Bauer J E (1998) Role of long-chain polyunsaturated n-3 fatty acids in the development of the nervous system of dogs and cats. JAVMA 213(5):619-622

  • [16] Conquer J A, Tierney M C, Zecevic J et al. (2000). Lipids 35(12):1305-1312.

  • [17] Alexander J W. Nutrition 14 (1998) 627.

  • [18] Belluzi A, Boschi S, Brignola C, Munarini A, Cariani G and Miglio F. Am J Clin Nutr 71 (2000)339.

  • [19] Kremer J M. Am J Clin Nutr 71 (2000) 249.

  • [20] Aggarwal B B, Sethi G, Nair A and Ichikawa H. Current Signal Transduction Therapy 1 (2006) 25-52.

  • [21] Zhao Y, Joshi-Barve J., Barve S., Chen L. J. Am. Coll. Nutr 23 (2004) 71-78.

  • [22] Vargas D L, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, Zimmerman A W, Pardo C A. Annals of Neurology 57 (2005) 67.

  • [23] Hauss-Wegrzyniak, B, Lukovic, L, Bigaud, M, Stoeckel, M E. Brain Research 749 (1998) 211.

  • [24] Licastro F and Chiappelli M. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 124 (2003) 539.

  • [25] Licastro F. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2 (2002) 639.

  • [26] Richardson A J and Montgomery P. Pediatrics 115 (2005)1360.

  • [27] Richardson A J. Lipids. 39 (2004) 1215.

  • [28] Richardson A J and Puri B K. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 26 (2002) 233.

  • [29] Burgess J R. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: observational and interventional studies. In: NIH workshop on omega-3 essential fatty acids and psychiatric disorders, 2-3 September 1998. Bethesda, Md.: National Institutes of Health; 1998.

  • [30] Peet M and Stokes C. Drugs 65 (2005) 1051.

  • [31] Fontani G, Corradeschi F and Felici A. Eur J Clin Invest. 35 (2005) 691.

  • [32] Mollica C M, Maruff P and Vance A. Hum Psychopharmacol 19 (2004) 445.

  • [33] WOQOL Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psycometric properties. Social Science and Medicine 46 (1998) 1569.

  • [34] Bannach F G, Gutierrez-Fernandez A, Parmer R J and Miles L A. J Thromb Haemost. 2 (2004) 2205.

  • [35] Choi Y. Adv Exp Med Bio1.560 (2005) 77.

  • [36] Leon KG and Karsan A. Histol Histopathol. 15 (2000) 1303.

  • [37] Gamoh S, Hashimoto M., Hossain S, Masumura S. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28 (2001) 266.

  • [38] Filbum C R and Griffin D. Veterinary Therapeutics. 6 (2005) 29.

  • [39] Mueller R S, Fieseler K V and Fettman M J. J Small An Pract 45 (2004) 293.

  • [40] Heinemann K M, Waldron M K, Bigley K E and Bauer J E (2005). Improvement of Retinal Function in Canine Puppies from Mothers Fed Dietary Long Chain n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids during Gestation and Lactation (abstract) in: The American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Meeting Conference Proceedings (ACVIM).

  • [41] US 20050075399

  • [42] US 20040028719

  • [43] Carrie I, Smirnova M, Clement M., De Javal D, Frances H, Bourre J M. Nutr. Neuroscience 5 (2002) 43

  • [44] Chan A D F, Nippak P, Murphey H., Ikeda-Douglas C, Muggenberg B, Head E, Cotman C W, Milgram N W. Behavioral Neuroscience 116 (2002) 443.

  • [45] Manly T., Robertson I C H, Anderson V A and Nimmo-Smith I (1999). TEA-Ch-The test of Everyday Attention for Children. Bury st Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.

  • [46] Wechsler D. (1999). The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). London, UK:Harcourt Assessment.

  • [47] Giogia G A, Isquith P K, Goy S C, Kenworthy L. Neuropsychol. Dev. Cogn. C. Child. Neropsychol 6 (2000) 235.

  • [48] Conners C K, (1990). Conners' rating scales manual. New York: Multi Health Systems, Inc.

  • [49] Binns A and Margrain, TH. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 25 (2005) 492.


Claims
  • 1. A method to reduce symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in a child comprising administering an effective amount of a marine phospholipid composition, wherein said symptoms are selected from the group consisting of ability to complete task, ability to stay on task, ability to follow instructions, ability to complete assignments, psychomotor function, long term memory, short term memory, ability to make a decision, ability to follow through on decision, ability to self-sustain attention, ability to engage in conversations, sensitivity to surroundings, ability to plan, ability to carry out plan, ability to listen, interruptions in social situations, temper tantrums, level/frequency of frustration, level/frequency restlessness, frequency/level fidgeting, ability to exhibit delayed gratification, aggressiveness, demanding behavior/frequency of demanding behavior, sleep patterns, restive sleep, interrupted sleep, awakening behavior, disruptive behavior, ability to exhibit control in social situations, ability to extrapolate information and ability to integrate information.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said marine phospholipid composition comprises phospholipids having the following structure:
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein said phospholipid composition comprises from about 20-50% of OH at positions R1 and/or R2.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein said phospholipid composition further comprises a lipid carrier.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said phospholipid composition is prepared from natural marine phospholipids isolated from a marine organism.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said phospholipid composition is enzymatically prepared by reacting lecithin with DHA and EPA in the presence of an enzyme.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein said lecithin is soybean or egg lecithin.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said omega-3 fatty acid moieties are selected from the group of EPA and DHA and combination thereof.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein said effective amount of said phospholipid composition comprises from about 300 to about 1000 mg omega-3 fatty acids.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein said phospholipid composition is administered orally.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein said phospholipid composition is provided in a gel capsule or pill.
  • 12. A method to reduce symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder comprising administering an effective amount of a marine phospholipid composition, wherein said symptoms are selected from the group consisting of ability to complete task, ability to stay on task, ability to follow instructions, ability to complete assignments, psychomotor function, long term memory, short term memory, ability to make a decision, ability to follow through on decision, ability to self-sustain attention, ability to engage in conversations, sensitivity to surroundings, ability to plan, ability to carry out plan, ability to listen, interruptions in social situations, temper tantrums, level/frequency of frustration, level/frequency restlessness, frequency/level fidgeting, ability to exhibit delayed gratification, aggressiveness, demanding behavior/frequency of demanding behavior, sleep patterns, restive sleep, interrupted sleep, awakening behavior, disruptive behavior, ability to exhibit control in social situations, ability to extrapolate information and ability to integrate information.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein said marine phospholipid composition comprises phospholipids having the following structure:
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein said phospholipid composition comprises from about 20-50% of OH at positions R1 and/or R2.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein said phospholipid composition further comprises a lipid carrier.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, wherein said phospholipid composition is prepared from natural marine phospholipids isolated from a marine organism.
  • 17. The method of claim 12, wherein said phospholipid composition is enzymatically prepared by reacting lecithin with DHA and EPA in the presence of an enzyme.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein said lecithin is soybean or egg lecithin.
  • 19. The method of claim 12, wherein said omega-3 fatty acid moieties are selected from the group of EPA and DHA and combination thereof.
  • 20. The method of claim 12, wherein said effective amount of said phospholipid composition comprises from about 300 to about 1000 mg omega-3 fatty acids.
  • 21. The method of claim 12, wherein said phospholipid composition is administered orally.
  • 22. The method of claim 12, wherein said phospholipid composition is provided in a gel capsule or pill.
  • 23. A method to reduce symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in a child with autistic spectrum disorder comprising administering an effective amount of a marine phospholipid composition, wherein said symptoms are selected from the group consisting of ability to complete task, ability to stay on task, ability to follow instructions, ability to complete assignments, psychomotor function, long term memory, short term memory, ability to make a decision, ability to follow through on decision, ability to self-sustain attention, ability to engage in conversations, sensitivity to surroundings, ability to plan, ability to carry out plan, ability to listen, interruptions in social situations, temper tantrums, level/frequency of frustration, level/frequency restlessness, frequency/level fidgeting, ability to exhibit delayed gratification, aggressiveness, demanding behavior/frequency of demanding behavior, sleep patterns, restive sleep, interrupted sleep, awakening behavior, disruptive behavior, ability to exhibit control in social situations, ability to extrapolate information and ability to integrate information.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein said marine phospholipid composition comprises phospholipids having the following structure:
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein said phospholipid composition comprises from about 20-50% of OH at positions R1 and/or R2.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein said phospholipid composition further comprises a lipid carrier.
  • 27. The method of claim 23, wherein said phospholipid composition is prepared from natural marine phospholipids isolated from a marine organism.
  • 28. The method of claim 23, wherein said phospholipid composition is enzymatically prepared by reacting lecithin with DHA and EPA in the presence of an enzyme.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein said lecithin is soybean or egg lecithin.
  • 30. The method of claim 23, wherein said omega-3 fatty acid moieties are selected from the group of EPA and DHA and combination thereof.
  • 31. The method of claim 23, wherein said effective amount of said phospholipid composition comprises from about 300 to about 1000 mg omega-3 fatty acids.
  • 32. The method of claim 23, wherein said phospholipid composition is administered orally.
  • 33. The method of claim 23, wherein said phospholipid composition is provided in a gel capsule or pill.
  • 34. A method of increasing cognitive performance in an aging mammal comprising administering an effective amount of a marine phospholipid composition.
  • 35. The method of claim 34, wherein said cognitive performance is selected from the group consisting of memory loss, forgetfulness, short-term memory loss, aphasia, disorientation, disinhibition, and behavioral changes.
  • 36. The method of claim 34, wherein said mammal is a human.
  • 37. The method of claim 34, wherein said mammal is a pet selected from the group consisting of cats and dogs.
  • 38. The method of claim 34, wherein said mammal is has symptoms of age-associated memory impairment or decline.
  • 39. The method of claim 34, wherein said marine phospholipid composition comprises phospholipids having the following structure:
  • 40. The method of claim 39, wherein said phospholipid composition comprises from about 20-50% of OH at positions R1 and/or R2.
  • 41. The method of claim 39, wherein said phospholipid composition further comprises a lipid carrier.
  • 42. The method of claim 34, wherein said phospholipid composition is prepared from natural marine phospholipids isolated from a marine organism.
  • 43. The method of claim 34, wherein said phospholipid composition is enzymatically prepared by reacting lecithin with DHA and EPA in the presence of an enzyme.
  • 44. The method of claim 43, wherein said lecithin is soybean or egg lecithin.
  • 45. The method of claim 34, wherein said omega-3 fatty acid moieties are selected from the group of EPA and DHA and combination thereof.
  • 46. The method of claim 34, wherein said effective amount of said phospholipid composition comprises from about 300 to about 1000 mg omega-3 fatty acids.
  • 47. The method of claim 34, wherein said phospholipid composition is administered orally.
  • 48. The method of claim 34, wherein said phospholipid composition is provided in a gel capsule or pill.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Applications 60/798,026, 60/798,027, and 60/798,030, all filed May 5, 2006, and U.S. Provisional Application 60/872,096, filed Dec. 1, 2006, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Provisional Applications (4)
Number Date Country
60798026 May 2006 US
60798027 May 2006 US
60798030 May 2006 US
60872096 Dec 2006 US