USE OF OPTICAL REFLECTANCE PROXIMITY DETECTOR FOR NUISANCE MITIGATION IN SMOKE ALARMS

Abstract

Various methods, systems, and devices for identifying a low battery charge of a smoke detector are presented. For example, a device may include a smoke detection sensor that detect smokes and, in response to detecting smoke, generate a smoke detection signal. The device may include battery test circuitry that tests a charge level of a battery installed in the smoke detector device. The device may include an audio output device that outputs a low battery chirp in response to the battery test circuitry determining the charge level of the battery installed in the smoke detector device is low. Also, the device may include a proximity detector that monitors for a wave movement of an object within a distance of the smoke detector device and generates a proximity detection signal when the proximity detector detects the wave movement performed by an object within the distance of the smoke detector device.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to smoke alarms, and more particularly to smoke alarms including proximity detectors for controlling operation of the smoke alarm.

BACKGROUND

Smoke alarms are utilized for detecting and warning the inhabitants of a home or other occupied location of the existence of smoke which may indicate a fire. Upon detection of the smoke by the smoke alarm, the device emits a shrill, loud alarm that notifies all individuals within the area that smoke has been detected and departure from the premises may be necessary.

While the smoke alarms are very effective at notifying individuals of the possible existence of fire that is generating the smoke, certain types of false alarm indications may often be very annoying to a user. These false alarms may be triggered, for example, by smoke generation within the kitchen during preparation of a meal. This may cause the creation of enough smoke that will set off the smoke alarm causing the loud, shrill alarm. In this case, a fire that is dangerous and out of control is not of concern to the residents so the loud, shrill smoke alarm will provide more of an annoyance than a benefit. Presently, there exists no method for easily discontinuing the loud, shrill alarm other than fanning the atmosphere in the area of the smoke alarm in an attempt to remove the smoke from the area that is causing the smoke alarm to activate or removing the battery or house power from the smoke alarm in order to turn it off Removal of the power source may be difficult as smoke alarms are usually mounted upon the ceiling or other high area of the house or building to provide maximum smoke detection capabilities.

An additional problem with existing smoke alarms is the battery check or low battery condition. In smoke alarms that are powered by batteries, it is often necessary to periodically check the battery within the smoke alarm in order to confirm that the battery has sufficient charge. This often requires obtaining a ladder or chair for the user to reach the smoke alarm which has been placed in a substantially high location within the home or building to maximize smoke detection capabilities. The user is required to push a button that is located on the smoke alarm to perform a battery check. An audible signal is provided for an indication of whether or not the battery is in need of replacement.

An additional related problem relates to the low battery condition within a smoke alarm. When the battery reaches a low power condition, the smoke alarm will commonly beep at a low duty cycle of around once per minute. Unfortunately, this beep often occurs in early morning hours when the house temperature is at a minimum and these conditions maximize the low battery condition and increase the likelihood of an alarm. This is of course a most irritating time for this to occur. Additionally, the beep is very difficult to locate since the beep is short and a single high frequency tone. The beep is short to enable up to a week or more of low power battery alert on a mostly depleted battery. The alert transducer uses a single high frequency, typically around 3 kilohertz due to the need to produce a very high output from a small transducer which necessitates the use of a high frequency resonate transducer. Due to the reflections and use of half wavelengths shorter than the distance between the human ears, it is very difficult to localize the source which may present a problem since most homes normally include a number of smoke alarms.

Thus, there is a need to provide an improved method for temporarily mitigating an undesired activation of a smoke alarm and to provide battery check capabilities within the smoke alarm.

SUMMARY

The present invention, as disclosed and described herein, in one aspect thereof, comprises smoke detection circuitry for detecting smoke and generating a detection signal responsive thereto. Proximity detection circuitry generates a proximity detection signal responsive to the detection of an object within in a selected distance of the smoke alarm. Alarm generation circuitry generates an audible alarm responsive to the detection signal. The audible alarm may be deactivated for a predetermined period of time responsive to at least one proximity detection signal.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a ionization type smoke alarm;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an optical type smoke alarm;

FIG. 3 is a more detailed circuit diagram of an optical type smoke alarm;

FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of a smoke alarm including proximity sensor operation capabilities according to the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 illustrates the various functionalities associated with the smoke alarm including proximity sensor modes of operation; and

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram describing the operation of the smoke alarm including proximity sensor modes of operation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numbers are used herein to designate like elements throughout, the various views and embodiments of a smoke alarm having proximity detection operation mode are illustrated and described, and other possible embodiments are described. The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, and in some instances the drawings have been exaggerated and/or simplified in places for illustrative purposes only. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate the many possible applications and variations based on the following examples of possible embodiments.

Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a functional block diagram of a first type of smoke alarm. The smoke alarm of FIG. 1 utilizes ionization detection to detect smoke. The alarm generation circuitry 102 is associated with an ionization sensor 104. The ionization sensor 104 detects particles of smoke using a small amount of radioactive americium 241. The radiation generated by the americium 241 passes through an ionization chamber within the ionization sensor 104. The ionization chamber comprises an air-filled space between two electrodes that permit a small constant current between the electrodes. Any smoke that enters the chamber absorbs the alpha particles emitted by the americium 241 which reduces the ionization and interrupts the current between the electrodes. When this condition is detected, the ionization sensor 104 generates an alarm signal to the alarm circuitry 102 that generates an audible alarm signal that is provided to the speaker 106. Associated with the ionization type smoke alarm is test circuitry 108 that enables testing of the present charge level associated with the battery 110. The battery 110 provides power to the ionization sensor 104, alarm generation circuitry 102, speaker 106 and test circuit 108 to power the smoke alarm.

Referring now also to FIG. 2, there is illustrated an alternative type of smoke alarm circuitry comprising an optical smoke alarm. The optical smoke alarm also includes alarm generation circuitry 202 that is responsive to smoke detection signals provided by an optical sensor 204. The optical sensor 204 includes a light sensor that includes a light source which may comprise an incandescent bulb or infrared LED, a lens to collimate the light into a beam and a photo diode or other photoelectric sensor for detecting light from the light source. In the absence of smoke, the light passes in front of the detector in a straight line. When smoke enters the optical chamber of the optical sensor 204 across the path of the light beam, some light is scattered by the smoke particles redirecting them at the photo diode or photo sensor, and thus triggering generation of an alarm signal to the alarm circuitry 202. The alarm generation circuitry 202 will generate the audible alarm signal to the speaker 206 associated with the alarm circuitry 202. As with the ionization circuit, the optical smoke alarm utilizes a test circuit 208 to test the charge on the battery 210. The battery 210 is responsible for powering all of the components of the optical smoke alarm including the alarm circuitry 202, optical sensor 204, speaker 206 and test circuit 208.

As described previously, some issues arising with existing smoke alarms, be they ionization or optical type smoke alarms, arise from the creation of false alarm situations such as, for example, when a small amount of smoke is created within the kitchen due to burning toast, food falling on the heating element of the oven, etc., or the ability to quickly and easily check the battery charge using the test circuitry. Presently, mitigation of an alarm requires disconnection of the power source to the smoke alarm in order to discontinue an undesired alarm. Additionally, any type of test of the battery charge requires pushing of a button on the external surface of the smoke alarm that requires the user to be able to physically touch the smoke alarm. This often presents a great challenge since either removing power sources to discontinue an undesired alarm or pressing a button to perform battery test operations require the user to get out a ladder or stand on a chair to access the smoke alarm placed in a high location to ensure its optimal performance.

FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of an optical smoke detection alarm based upon an LDR (light detecting resistor) 302 and lamp 304 pair for sensing smoke. The alarm works by sensing the smoke produced during a fire. The circuit produces an audible alarm from speaker 306 when smoke is detected. When there is no smoke, the light from the lamp 304 falls directly upon the LDR 302. The LDR resistance will be low, and the voltage across the LDR will be below 0.6 volts. Transistor 308 will be turned off in this state and the circuit is inactive. When there is sufficient smoke to mask the light from the lamp 304 falling on the LDR 302, the LDR 302 resistance increases and so does the voltage across the LDR. This will cause the voltage at the gate of transistor 308 to increase and turn on transistor 308. This provides a voltage to power circuit 310 which generates a 5 volt signal to a tone generator 312. The tone signal from tone generator 312 is amplified by an amplifier 314 which is used to drive the speaker 306. Diodes 316 and 318 are used to drop the voltage input to the tone generator 312 from the power circuit 310.

Referring now to FIG. 4, there is illustrated a block diagram of a circuit which enables a user to utilize proximity detection circuitry for temporarily abating an undesired alarm or performing battery test operations rather than using previously described processes. While the implementation with respect to FIG. 4 describes the use of proximity sensor circuitry 402 within an optical type smoke alarm, the proximity sensor circuitry 402 could also be implemented within the ionization type circuitry described hereinabove. The smoke alarm detection capabilities of the smoke alarm of FIG. 4 operate in a similar manner to the optical alarm described previously. Alarm generation circuitry 404 generates alarm signals to a speaker 406 responsive to smoke detection signals received from optical sensor 408. The optical sensor 408 generates the smoke detection signal to the alarm generation circuitry 404 in the same manner as that described previously with respect to the optical smoke alarm of FIG. 2.

The optical sensor 408 in addition to detecting smoke is used for detecting the proximity of a user's hand or other item in conjunction with the proximity sensor circuitry 402. The proximity sensor circuitry 402 detects when a hand or for example, a broom or other item are being waved in close proximity to the smoke alarm. The optical sensor 408 comprises a short-range (approximately 6 inches) optical proximity sensor that in conjunction with the proximity sensor circuitry 402 may be used to control operations of the smoke alarm with either the wave of a hand or some other readily available object such as a broom. The test circuitry 410 enables testing of the charge within a battery 412. The battery 412 provides power to each of the components within the smoke alarm circuit.

Utilizing a combination of the proximity sensor circuitry 402, optical sensor 408 and alarm generation circuitry 404, the smoke alarm may provide a number of proximity controller functionalities. These are generally illustrated in FIG. 5. A number of proximity controlled functions 502 may be provided using the proximity sensor 402. The proximity controlled functions include the alarm mitigation function 504 and the battery test function 506. The alarm mitigation function 504 enables a temporary discontinuation of the audible alarm in situations when an undesired activation of the alarm has occurred. This would occur for example, when a small amount of smoke created within a kitchen that does not indicate a fire or emergency condition has been created. The proximity sensor of the smoke alarm is activated when an object such as a hand or a broom is brought close to the optical sensor 408. If the smoke alarm has been activated due to kitchen smoke or other situations that have been resolved by human intervention, proximity detection would enable the user to disable the smoke alarm for a short period of time, such as 3 minutes, to allow the area around the smoke alarm to air out. A double wave or other more complex detection by the proximity sensor circuitry 402 and optical sensor 408 may be accomplished in a short period of time, such as less than 10 seconds in order to enable assurances that the detection was for a desired mitigation of the alarm and not some type of random event occurring during actual smoke detection.

In order to assist a user in temporarily mitigating the alarm, a momentary change in the audible alarm would be desirable for each proximity event that has been detected by the optical sensor 408 and proximity sensor circuit 402. This would assist the user in knowing whether they had accurately or inaccurately waved their hand or broom in the area of the smoke alarm and provide for an audible indication of aiming feedback with respect to the proximity detection. After the appropriate combination of proximity detection events have been detected by the optical sensor 408 and proximity sensor circuit 402, the audible alarm would be temporarily discontinued.

The smoke alarm commonly beeps at a low duty cycle of around once per minute when the battery 412 has its charge fall below a predetermined level. These beeps can often be very difficult to locate since the beep is short and comprises a single high frequency tone. The beep is short to enable up to a week or more of low battery alerts to be created on an almost depleted battery. The alert transducer uses a single high frequency chirp typically around 3 kilohertz due to the need to produce a very high output from a small transducer. This necessitates the use of a high frequency resonate transducer. Due to the reflections and the use of a half wavelength shorter than the distance between the human ear, it is often very difficult to locate the source requiring the user to check each smoke alarm within the house requiring a great deal of time.

The battery test functionality 506 enables a battery test operation to be performed on the battery 412 within the smoke alarm without having to manually press a button on the smoke alarm. The battery test functionality 506 can be utilized in two situations. When a low battery charge chirp is being emitted by the smoke alarm, the low battery test functionality 506 may be used to determine whether a particular smoke alarm has a low battery charge or whether the battery presently has sufficient charge. The battery test functionality 506 would similarly be useful for performing the periodic battery charge tests that are required to ensure the smoke alarm is in working operation.

By utilizing the proximity sensor circuitry 402, if the smoke alarm has not been activated to indicate detection of smoke, the detection of a single proximity event from a hand or broom by the optical sensor 408 and proximity sensor circuitry 402 initiates a battery check test. If the battery 412 is weak, the test circuitry 410 will cause the production of a distinctive series of beeps or a distinctive tone to indicate a dying battery. If the battery 412 is sufficiently charged, a single short beep of a different tone may be created. Thus, if a user hears a low battery beep, they can use their broom or hand to quickly and easily check all of the smoke alarms within their home without having to climb up on a chair or ladder or remove the devices in order to press a detection button upon the smoke alarm.

As described previously, smoke alarms generally use either an ionization chamber or optical smoke detection circuitry or a combination of both to detect smoke. These differing techniques have distinct advantages and disadvantages. However, a high performance optical reflective detector implemented within the circuit of FIG. 4 including proximity sensor circuitry 402 can readily be adapted to detect reflectance from smoke and to provide proximity detection data since both detections are equivalent low reflectance functions. The proximity detector is more sophisticated since it must deal with ambient light while the conventional optical smoke detector does not have to cancel ambient light since it looks for reflections from smoke in an optically baffled compartment which blocks out ambient light but allows the entry of smoke. A reflectance proximity detector can drive two different LEDs, one for proximity detection and the other for smoke detection within the optical sensor 408. A light pipe can provide a signal from the baffled smoke detector and also from the outside proximity view. Depending on which LED is driven, the proximity detector is either for reflectance above a threshold for either the proximity detection or for smoke and of course giving a different alarm response. Optionally, an auxiliary photo diode can be used for the smoke detector portion to avoid artifacts or issues arising from ambient light. Because the proximity detection technology uses a low duty cycle controller to make proximity detection measurements every second or so, this low duty cycle controller can also be used for the low duty cycle smoke controller which is beneficial for reducing battery charge consumption.

Referring now to FIG. 6, there is illustrated a flow diagram describing the operation of the proximity detection controlled smoke alarm. Initially, at step 602, the optical sensor 408 and proximity sensor circuitry 402 monitor for a proximity actuation. Inquiry step 604 determines whether there has been a detection of a proximity actuation. If not, control passes back to step 602 to continue monitoring for a proximity actuation. Once a proximity actuation is detected, inquiry step 606 determines if the smoke alarm is presently activated. If so, control passes to inquiry step 608 which determines if a predetermined number of proximity activations have been detected. If not, the alarm tone provided by the smoke alarm may be altered at step 610 and control returns back to step 602 to continue monitoring for additional proximity activations. If inquiry step 608 determines that a predetermined number of proximity actuations have been detected, the smoke alarm is disabled at step 612. Inquiry step 614 monitors for the expiration of a selected period of time. If the period of time has not yet expired, the process remains at inquiry step 614. Once the predetermined period of time has expired, control passes to step 616, wherein the smoke alarm is re-enabled and control passes back to step 602 to continue monitoring for proximity actuation. Once the alarm is re-enabled, the smoke detector can monitor for smoke and react accordingly.

If inquiry step 606 determines that the smoke alarm is not presently activated, control passes to inquiry step 618 to make a determination if the battery low alarm is presently active for the smoke alarm. If so, a battery low indication is audibly provided from the smoke alarm at step 620. If the battery low alarm has not been activated, a battery charge check is performed at step 622. Inquiry step 624 determines whether the battery is in a low charge condition. If not, a battery OK audible indication is provided at step 626 to indicate a sufficient charge and control passes back to step 602. If inquiry step 624 determines that the battery is in a low charge condition, the battery low indication is provided at step 620 before control passes back to step 602 to monitor for additional proximity actuations.

The above-described solution provides a low cost intuitive battery alarm control system to limit nuisance alarms within the smoke alarm and enables ease of battery charge checking using a proximity detection control process. The system also improves safety since users often remove batteries or take down smoke alarms that are producing spurious alarms or low battery beeping alarms. Users will also take down unaffected smoke alarms since the user cannot localize the beep associated with the alarm and then do not replace the alarm. Consumers do not check battery levels if the smoke alarm is out of reach. Additionally, use of an optical reflection proximity control system is better than a capacitive proximity system since convenient hand extension devices such as brooms would not work to activate a capacitive sensor which senses a conductive object such as the human hand or body.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that this smoke alarm having proximity detection operation mode provides an improved method for controlling operation of a smoke alarm. It should be understood that the drawings and detailed description herein are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive manner, and are not intended to be limiting to the particular forms and examples disclosed. On the contrary, included are any further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope hereof, as defined by the following claims. Thus, it is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments.

Claims

1. A method for identifying a smoke detector having a low battery charge, the method comprising: hearing, by a user from an unlocated smoke detector of a plurality of smoke detectors, a low battery chirp;moving, by the user, in proximity to a first smoke detector of the plurality of smoke detectors, a first object to trigger a proximity-induced battery check of the first smoke detector;determining, by the first smoke detector, a first battery charge condition in response to detecting the first object moved in proximity to the first smoke detector;outputting, by the first smoke detector, a first auditory indication indicative of the first battery charge condition being sufficient in response to the object moved in proximity to the first smoke detector;moving, by the user, in proximity to a second smoke detector of the plurality of smoke detectors, a second object to trigger a proximity-induced battery check of the second smoke detector;determining, by the second smoke detector, a second battery charge condition in response to the second object moved in proximity to the second smoke detector; andoutputting, by the second smoke detector, a second auditory indication indicative of the second battery charge condition being low in response to the second object moved in proximity to the second smoke detector, wherein the second smoke detector is identified by the user as the unlocated smoke detector.

2. The method for identifying the smoke detector having the low battery charge of claim 1, further comprising: outputting, by the second smoke detector, a low battery chirp periodically, wherein the low battery chirp has a frequency such that a half wavelength of the low battery chirp is shorter than a distance between the two ears of the user.

3. The method for identifying the smoke detector having the low battery charge of claim 1, wherein determining, by the first smoke detector, the first battery charge condition in response to detecting the first object moved in proximity to the first smoke detector comprises: determining, by the first smoke detector, that a first battery low alarm of the first smoke detector is inactive.

4. The method for identifying the smoke detector having the low battery charge of claim 3, wherein determining, by the first smoke detector, the first battery charge condition in response to detecting the first object moved in proximity to the first smoke detector further comprises: performing, by the first smoke detector, a battery charge check in response to the first smoke detector determining that the first battery low alarm of the first smoke detector is inactive.

5. The method for identifying the smoke detector having the low battery charge of claim 3, wherein determining, by the second smoke detector, the second battery charge condition in response to detecting the second object moved in proximity to the second smoke detector comprises: determining, by the second smoke detector, that a second battery low alarm of the second smoke detector is active.

6. The method for identifying the smoke detector having the low battery charge of claim 1, further comprising: detecting, by the first smoke detector, proximity actuation caused by the first object moving in proximity to the first smoke detector;in response to the proximity actuation, determining whether a first smoke alarm of the first smoke detector is active, wherein: the first smoke alarm is active when smoke is detected by the first smoke detector, anddetermining the first battery charge condition occurs in response to determining that the first smoke alarm is not active.

7. The method for identifying the smoke detector having the low battery charge of claim 6, further comprising: detecting, by the second smoke detector, proximity actuation caused by the second object moving in proximity to the second smoke detector;in response to the proximity actuation, determining whether a second smoke alarm of the second smoke detector is active, wherein: the second smoke alarm is active when smoke is detected by the second smoke detector, anddetermining the second battery charge condition occurs in response to determining that the second smoke alarm is not active.

8. The method for identifying the smoke detector having the low battery charge of claim 1, wherein the first object and the second object are the same object.

9. The method for identifying the smoke detector having the low battery charge of claim 8, wherein the first object and the second object are a hand of the user.

10. A smoke detector device, comprising: a smoke detection sensor that detect smokes and, in response to detecting smoke, generate a smoke detection signal;battery test circuitry that tests a charge level of a battery installed in the smoke detector device;an audio output device that outputs a low battery chirp in response to the battery test circuitry determining the charge level of the battery installed in the smoke detector device is low; anda proximity detector that monitors for a wave movement of an object within a distance of the smoke detector device and generates a proximity detection signal when the proximity detector detects the wave movement performed by an object within the distance of the smoke detector device, wherein: the proximity detector signal generated by the proximity detector causes a low battery audible indication to be output by the audio output device when the battery test circuitry indicates that the charge level of the battery is low.

11. The smoke detector device of claim 10, wherein the smoke detection sensor, battery test circuitry, audio output device, and proximity detector are powered by the battery.

12. The smoke detector device of claim 10, wherein the audio output device generates the low battery chirp at a frequency such that a half wavelength of the low battery chirp is shorter than a distance between two ears of a person.

13. The smoke detector device of claim 10, wherein the battery test circuitry determines if a low battery alarm of the smoke detector device is active in response to the proximity detector detecting the wave movement of the object.

14. The smoke detector device of claim 13, wherein the battery test circuitry performs a battery charge check in response to determining that the low battery alarm is inactive.

15. The smoke detector device of claim 10, wherein the smoke detector device, in response to the proximity detector detecting the wave movement of the object, determines whether a smoke alarm of the smoke detector device is active, wherein the smoke alarm is active when smoke is detected by the smoke detector.

16. The smoke detector device of claim 15, wherein the battery test circuitry determines the charge level of the battery in response to determining that the smoke alarm is not active and the wave movement being detected by the proximity detector.

17. The smoke detector device of claim 15, wherein the object is a hand, such that the proximity detector is configured to monitor for the wave movement of the hand within the distance of the smoke detector device.

18. A method for identifying a low battery charge of a smoke detector device, the method comprising: outputting a low battery chirp at a periodic interval indicative of the low battery charge of a battery installed in the smoke detector device;monitoring for a wave movement within a distance of the smoke detector device using a proximity detector;generating a proximity detection signal in response to the wave movement being detected within the distance of the smoke detector device by the proximity detector;determining, using battery test circuitry, the low battery charge condition is present in response to the proximity detection signal; andoutputting, an auditory indication of the low battery charge condition in response to the proximity detection signal and determining that the low battery charge condition is present, wherein the auditory indication of the low battery charge condition is distinct from the low battery chirp.

19. The method for identifying the low battery charge of the smoke detector device of claim 18, wherein determining, using the battery test circuitry, the low battery charge condition is present in response to detecting the wave movement comprises: determining that a battery low alarm of the first smoke detector is active.

20. The method for identifying the low battery charge of the smoke detector device of claim 18, further comprising: determining whether a smoke alarm of the smoke detector device is active in response to the wave movement being detected, wherein: the smoke alarm is active when smoke is detected by the smoke detector device, anddetermining, using the battery test circuitry, the low battery charge condition is performed in response to determining the smoke alarm is inactive.