USE OF POLYCAPROLACTONE PLASTICIZERS IN POLY(VINYL CHLORIDE) COMPOUNDS

Abstract
Use of polycaprolactone plasticizer is disclosed for flexible polyvinyl chloride compounds. The compounds can pass the very demanding UL-910 plenum burn test for usage in wire and cable articles.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention concerns use of polycaprolactone to plasticize poly(vinyl chloride) compounds as a replacement for polyvinylidene fluoride in wire and cable coverings, such as insulation and jacketing.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

People benefit from plastic articles. From their invention in the mid-20th Century until the present, thermoplastic polymers have become the composition of many consumer products. Such products are relatively lightweight, sturdy, and corrosion resistant.


Plasticized poly(vinyl chloride), invented by Waldo Semon of B.F. Goodrich, has been a top performing plastic resin for decades. Billions of kilograms of poly(vinyl chloride) (also known as “PVC”) resin are molded and extruded each year into countless products. With conventional additives, poly(vinyl chloride) provides unparalleled durability, flame resistance, chemical resistance, weatherability, electrical properties and clarity to name a few.


Wire and cable manufacturers often use plasticized PVC for insulation and sheathing. Performance of plasticized PVC compound at various temperatures is predicted based on accelerated oven aging tests. A cable rated at 60° C. by Underwriters' Laboratories (UL) is tested at 100° C. for seven days, whereas a cable rated at 75° C. is tested at 100° C. for ten days. Some plasticizers conventionally used are phthalates, citrates, soyates, and trimellitates.


Some wire and cable requirements include low smoke generation, measured using both peak optical density and average optical density. PVC plasticized with low smoke plasticizers like phosphates, are particularly suitable in that circumstance. But these formulations are inadequate because they do not pass the UL-910 burn test in certain plenum cable constructions.


When a compound of PVC plasticized with low smoke plasticizers is unable to pass the UL-910 burn test, wire and cable manufacturers use polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) for coverings such as insulation and jacketing, particularly jacketing, when the wire or cable is to be used in a plenum construction application which requires low smoke generation.


PVDF is expensive, has difficulty in compatibility with other thermoplastic resins, and sometimes is scarce as a raw material in the market.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

What is needed in the art is a plasticized PVC to replace PVDF in wire and cable formulations for “coverings”, a term of art which includes both insulation and jacketing materials, particularly for uses in building construction such as riser and plenum locations, and more particularly for wire and cable jacketing requiring low smoke generation.


The present invention solves that problem by using polycaprolactone as that plasticizer, such that polycaprolactone-plasticized PVC can replace PVDF as a covering for low smoke generation flame retardant materials.


One aspect of the present invention is a wire or cable covering, comprising: a mixture of (a) poly(vinyl chloride) and (b) polycaprolactone plasticizing the poly(vinyl chloride), wherein the mixture has a Limiting Oxygen Index of greater 60% according to ASTM D2863; an Elongation at Break of greater than 150% according to ASTM D638 (Type IV); a Plastic Brittleness less than 0° C. according to ASTM D746 as measured in 2° C. increments; and a Dynamic Thermal Stability of more than 25 min according to ASTM 2538.


Another aspect of the present invention is a wire or cable covering described above, wherein the wire or cable is a plenum wire or cable.


Another aspect of the present invention is a wire or cable insulation or jacketing described above, wherein the wire or cable is a riser wire or cable.


Another aspect of the present invention is a wire or cable, comprising a transmission core of optical fiber or metal wire and an insulation or jacketing described above.


Another aspect of the present invention is a method of using plasticized poly(vinyl chloride) in wire or cable covering, comprising the steps: (a) mixing polycaprolactone with polyvinyl chloride to form a plasticized polyvinyl chloride; and (b) extruding the plasticized polyvinyl chloride around a transmission core of optical fiber or metal wire to form a plenum wire or cable which passes the UL-910 test.


Another aspect of the present invention is a plenum wire or cable, comprising: polyvinyl chloride plasticized with polycaprolactone as a covering wherein the plenum wire or cable passes the UL 910 plenum test.


Another aspect of the invention is an industrial curtain comprising the mixture of poly(vinyl chloride) and polycaprolactone described above.


Additional advantages of the invention are explained in reference to embodiments of the invention.







EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Polyvinyl Chloride Resins


Polyvinyl chloride polymers are widely available throughout the world. Polyvinyl chloride resin as referred to in this specification includes polyvinyl chloride homopolymers, vinyl chloride copolymers, graft copolymers, and vinyl chloride polymers polymerized in the presence of any other polymer such as a HDT distortion temperature enhancing polymer, impact toughener, barrier polymer, chain transfer agent, stabilizer, plasticizer or flow modifier.


For example a combination of modifications may be made with the PVC polymer by overpolymerizing a low viscosity, high glass transition temperature (Tg) enhancing agent such as SAN resin, or an imidized polymethacrylate in the presence of a chain transfer agent.


In another alternative, vinyl chloride may be polymerized in the presence of said Tg enhancing agent, the agent having been formed prior to or during the vinyl chloride polymerization. However, only those resins possessing the specified average particle size and degree of friability exhibit the advantages applicable to the practice of the present invention.


In the practice of the invention, there may be used polyvinyl chloride homopolymers or copolymers of polyvinyl chloride comprising one or more comonomers copolymerizable therewith. Suitable comonomers for vinyl chloride include acrylic and methacrylic acids; esters of acrylic and methacrylic acid, wherein the ester portion has from 1 to 12 carbon atoms, for example methyl, ethyl, butyl and ethylhexyl acrylates and the like; methyl, ethyl and butyl methacrylates and the like; hydroxyalkyl esters of acrylic and methacrylic acid, for example hydroxymethyl acrylate, hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate and the like; glycidyl esters of acrylic and methacrylic acid, for example glycidyl acrylate, glycidyl methacrylate and the like; alpha, beta unsaturated dicarboxylic acids and their anhydrides, for example maleic acid, fumaric acid, itaconic acid and acid anhydrides of these, and the like; acrylamide and methacrylamide; acrylonitrile and methacrylonitrile; maleimides, for example, N-cyclohexyl maleimide; olefin, for example ethylene, propylene, isobutylene, hexene, and the like; vinylidene chloride, for example, vinylidene chloride; vinyl ester, for example vinyl acetate; vinyl ether, for example methyl vinyl ether, allyl glycidyl ether, n-butyl vinyl ether and the like; crosslinking monomers, for example diallyl phthalate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, methylene bis-acrylamide, tracrylyl triazine, divinyl ether, allyl silanes and the like; and including mixtures of any of the above comonomers.


The present invention can also use chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC), wherein PVC containing approximately 57% chlorine is further reacted with chlorine radicals produced from chlorine gas dispersed in water and irradiated to generate chlorine radicals dissolved in water to produce CPVC, a polymer with a higher glass transition temperature (Tg) and heat distortion temperature. Commercial CPVC typically contains by weight from about 58% to about 70% and preferably from about 63% to about 68% chlorine. CPVC copolymers can be obtained by chlorinating such PVC copolymers using conventional methods such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,996,489, which is incorporated herein by reference. Commercial sources of CPVC include Lubrizol Corporation.


The preferred composition is a polyvinyl chloride homopolymer.


Commercially available sources of polyvinyl chloride polymers include OxyVinyls LP of Dallas, Tex. and Shintech USA of Freeport, Tex.


PVC Compounds


Flexible PVC resin compounds typically contain a variety of additives selected according to the performance requirements of the article produced therefrom well within the understanding of one skilled in the art without the necessity of undue experimentation.


The PVC compounds used herein contain effective amounts of additives ranging from 0.01 to about 500 weight parts per 100 weight parts PVC (parts per hundred resin-phr).


For example, various primary and/or secondary lubricants such as oxidized polyethylene, paraffin wax, fatty acids, and fatty esters and the like can be utilized.


Thermal and ultra-violet light (UV) stabilizers can be utilized such as various organo tins, for example dibutyl tin, dibutyltin-S—S′-bi-(isooctylmercaptoacetate), dibutyl tin dilaurate, dimethyl tin diisooctylthioglycolate, mixed metal stabilizers like Barium Zinc and Calcium Zinc, and lead stabilizers (tri-basic lead sulfate, di-basic lead phthalate, for example). Secondary stabilizers may be included for example a metal salt of phosphoric acid, polyols, and epoxidized oils. Specific examples of salts include water-soluble, alkali metal phosphate salts, disodium hydrogen phosphate, orthophosphates such as mono-, di-, and tri-orthophosphates of said alkali metals, alkali metal polyphosphates, -tetrapolyphosphates and -metaphosphates and the like. Polyols such as sugar alcohols, and epoxides such as epoxidized soybean oil can be used. Typical levels of secondary stabilizers range from about 0.1 wt. parts to about 10.0 wt. parts per 100 wt. parts PVC (phr).


In addition, antioxidants such as phenolics, BPA, BHT, BHA, various hindered phenols and various inhibitors like substituted benzophenones can be utilized.


Various processing aids, fillers, pigments, flame retardants and reinforcing materials can also be utilized in amounts up to about 200 or 300 phr. Exemplary processing aids are acrylic polymers such as poly methyl(meth)acrylate based materials.


Adjustment of melt viscosity can be achieved as well as increasing melt strength by employing 0.5 to 5 phr of commercial acrylic process aids such as those from Rohm and Haas under the Paraloid® trademark. Paraloid®. K-120ND, K-120N, K-175, and other processing aids are disclosed in The Plastics and Rubber Institute: International Conference on PVC Processing, Apr. 26-28, 1983, Paper No. 17.


Examples of fillers include calcium carbonate, clay, silica and various silicates, talc, carbon black and the like. Reinforcing materials include glass fibers, polymer fibers and cellulose fibers. Such fillers are generally added in amounts of from about 3 to about 500 phr of PVC. Preferably from 3 to 300 phr of filler are employed for extruded profiles such as louvers or cove base moldings. Also, flame retardant fillers like ATH (Aluminum trihydrates), AOM (ammonium octamolybdate), antimony trioxides, magnesium oxides and zinc borates are added to boost the flame retardancy of polyvinyl chloride. The concentrations of these fillers range from 1 phr to 200 phr.


Examples of various pigments include titanium dioxide, carbon black and the like. Mixtures of fillers, pigments and/or reinforcing materials also can be used.


The compound of the present invention can include other conventional plastics additives in an amount that is sufficient to obtain a desired processing or performance property for the compound. The amount should not be wasteful of the additive nor detrimental to the processing or performance of the compound. Those skilled in the art of thermoplastics compounding, without undue experimentation but with reference to such treatises as Plastics Additives Database (2004) from Plastics Design Library (www.elsevier.com), can select from many different types of additives for inclusion into the compounds of the present invention.


Non-limiting examples of other optional additives include adhesion promoters; biocides (antibacterials, fungicides, and mildewcides), anti-fogging agents; anti-static agents; bonding, blowing and foaming agents; dispersants; fillers and extenders; fire and flame retardants and smoke suppresants; impact modifiers; initiators; lubricants; micas; pigments, colorants and dyes; plasticizers; processing aids; release agents; silanes, titanates and zirconates; slip and anti-blocking agents; stabilizers; stearates; ultraviolet light absorbers; viscosity regulators; waxes; and combinations of them.


Polycaprolactone Plasticizer


Polycaprolactone is a polymer of the following structure:




embedded image


in which R is a diol such as a glycolic moiety; and m and n are integers of sufficient amount to produce a polycaprolactone having a weight average molecular weight of 10,000-80,000 g/mol (ASTM 6579). In other words, commercially available polycaprolactone can have a molecular weight of 10,000 to 80,000 g/mol, a melting point from 58-60° C., and when in solid form, a melt flow index ranging from 3-40 dg/min when measured at 160° C.


Polycaprolactone is known to be an external plasticizer for PVC, according to product literature published by Perstorp, one of the makers of polycaprolactone under its CAPA™ brand name.


What has been found to be unexpected is that the use of polycaprolactone as a plasticizer for PVC is particularly suitable in wire or cable insulation or jacketing, particularly in construction installations such as risers and plenums, and especially for installation in plenum locations in a building.


What made the usage unexpected is the ability of a polycaprolactone-plasticized PVC when constructed as a covering, such as insulation or jacketing, for a cable to achieve a successful test result for UL's UL-910 test for plenum uses which requires at the conclusion of the test: (a) a flame spread horizontally of less than five feet; a value for peak smoke density of less than 0.5 optical density (a dimensionless value); and (c) a value for average smoke density of less than 0.5 optical density. Both peak smoke density and average smoke density are indications of the amount of smoke generation during the test.


The parts by weight of the polycaprolactone plasticizer blend in the PVC compound can range from about 1 to about 120, and preferably from about 25 to about 40 parts per 100 parts of PVC.


Polycaprolactone is commercially available from Perstorp of Toledo, Ohio under the CAPA™ brand. The product range of CAPA™ branded polycaprolactone is currently its 6000 series, with grade 6500 being particularly preferred. As explained below, the compound of the invention can be formed into industrial curtains. For this embodiment, CAPA™ brand grade PL1000 is particularly useful.


Processing


The preparation of compounds of the present invention is as follows. The compound of the present can be made in batch or continuous operations from a powder blend which is typically prepared in a batch-wise operation.


Such powder blending in a batch process typically occurs in a powder mixer such as a Henschel or Littleford mixer, or a ribbon blender that physically mixes all the additives including liquid plasticizers with PVC resin without bringing the polymer matrix to a melting temperature. The mixing speeds range from 60 to 3000 rpm and temperature of mixing can be ambient up to 250° F. (121° C.). In the present invention, all powders are heated to 140° F. (60° C.) and then the polycaprolactone pellets are added, with the mixture then being dropped at 155° F. (68° C.). The output from the mixer is a well blended powder product that can flow into a machine that can bring up the blend temperature to induce melting of some ingredients including the PVC resin.


Mixing in a batch process typically occurs in a Banbury mixer that is also elevated to a temperature that is sufficient to melt the polymer matrix to permit addition of the solid ingredient additives of any optional additive. The mixing speeds range from 60 to 3000 rpm and temperature of mixing ranges from 250° F. to 430° F. (120° C. to 220° C.), typically 325° F. (163° C.). Then, the melted mixture is put on to a two roll mill at 320° F./345° F. (160-174° C.). The material is milled for about four minutes and then the milled, compounded strip is then cubed for later extrusion or molding into polymeric articles.


Compounds can be formed into powder, cubes, or pellets for further extrusion or molding into polymeric components and parts.


Subsequent extrusion or molding techniques are well known to those skilled in the art of thermoplastics polymer engineering. Without undue experimentation but with such references as “Extrusion, The Definitive Processing Guide and Handbook”; “Handbook of Molded Part Shrinkage and Warpage”; “Specialized Molding Techniques”; “Rotational Molding Technology”; and “Handbook of Mold, Tool and Die Repair Welding”, all published by Plastics Design Library (www.elesevier.com), one can make articles of any conceivable shape and appearance using compounds of the present invention.


Usefulness of the Invention

Underwriters' Laboratories (UL) perform testing to determine the ratings for wire and cable articles. While articles with a 60° C. or a 75° C. UL rating are useful, there are several types of constructions which require a UL rating of 90° C. or higher ratings. Non-limiting examples of them are low voltage power cables like tray cables, building wires with ratings of THW, THHN and THWN, telecommunications cables, apparatus wires and electric cords.


The UL-910 plenum burn test is very challenging to any wire or cable insulation or jacketing, because in the UL-910 plenum burn test, a 12 inch layer of 24 foot lengths of cable are supported by a one foot wide cable rack, which is filled with the cables. The cables are burned by an 88 kW (300,000 BTU/hr) methane flame. There is also a forced air draft of 240 ft/minute, maintained throughout the 20 minutes of testing. During the burn test, flame spread is observed through small windows spaced one foot apart. Average and peak optical smoke densities are measured by a photocell installed in the exhaust duct. Stated in other words, the UL-910 is the most difficult of currently identified standardized tests for minimization of horizontal flame spread and low smoke generation.


Any elongated material suitable for communicating, transferring or other delivering energy of electrical, optical or other nature is a candidate for the core of the wire or cable of the present invention. Non-limiting examples are metals such as copper or aluminum or silver or combinations of them; ceramics such as glass; and optical grade polymers, such as polycarbonate.


Regardless of the material used as the core to transport energy, the polycaprolactone-plasticized PVC compound then serves as the insulation sleeve or the jacketing cover or both for use in risers or plenums in buildings needing electrical power wires or cables or fiber optic communication wires or cables. Preferably, the compound serves as the jacketing of a plenum wire or cable.


Formation of a wire or cable utilizes conventional techniques known to those having ordinary skill in the art, without undue experimentation. Typically, the core or cores of the wire or cable is/are available along one axis and molten thermoplastic compound is delivered to a specific location using a cross head extrusion die along that axis from an angle ranging from 30 degrees to 150 degrees, with a preference for 90 degrees. Most commonly, the wire is moving along that one axis, in order that delivery of the molten thermoplastic compound to that specific location coats the wire or cable or combination of them or plurality of either or both of them, whereupon cooling forms the insulation or jacket concentrically about the wire or cable. The most common equipment employed is a subset of extrusion equipment called cross head extrusion which propels the core or cores past an extruder dispensing molten thermoplastic compound at approximately 90° to the axis of the moving wire or cable core or cores undergoing cross head extrusion. It has been found that compounds of the present invention can be used as “drop in replacements” for conventional wire and cable covering using conventional draw-down ratios.


As mentioned previously, one embodiment of the invention is a wire or cable specifically configured for use in a riser, the location in a building in which the wire or cable extends vertically from a floor to a wall or the floor to a ceiling or the floor to another floor above or below the original floor. This vertical location requires the wire or cable to satisfy the UL-1666 riser burn test. Briefly, that test requires a test chamber which simulates an eight feet by four feet building wire shaft, with twelve feet of height between the source of ignition and the floor above. A very large propane burner, (about 495,000 BTU/h) is ignited for a period of 30 minutes. Flames must not extend above the 12 foot mark, in order for the cable to pass the test.


Another embodiment of the invention is a wire or cable specifically configured for use in a plenum, the location in a building in which the wire or cable extends horizontally between a ceiling and the floor above. This horizontal location requires the wire or cable to satisfy the UL-910 plenum burn test. The conditions of that test have been described above.


As explained previously, the compound of the invention can be employed as insulation or jacketing of any number of wire or cable structures for transmission of electrical, optical, or other energy. A non-limiting example of a wire or cable of the present invention is a fiber optic cable. Typically, a fiber optic cable comprises multiple fiber optic bundles surrounded by a single layer of polymer compound as a covering. The PVC compound described above can be used as that covering because it can pass the very difficult UL-910 horizontal burn test for plenum uses. As such, PVC compound of the invention can be a less expensive, reliable substitute for PVDF compound for wire and cable covering.


The amount of polymer compound used in a wire or cable covering is identified by UL according to UL 444 which correlates the thickness of the covering in relation to the diameter of the cable core.


Table 1 shows the currently published correlation, with the understanding that if the cable is not round, the equivalent diameter should be calculated using 1.1284*(Thickness of the Cable×Width of the Cable)1/2.












TABLE 1









Tensile Strength <17.24
Tensile Strength at Least



MPa (mm)
17.24 MPa (mm)











Cable Core

Min. Ave.

Min. Ave.


Diameter
Min. Ave.
Thickness at
Min. Ave.
Thickness at


(mm)
Thickness
Any Point
Thickness
Any Point





0.0-3.3
0.33
0.25
0.33
0.25


 3.3-8.89
0.58
0.46
0.33
0.25


 8.89-10.16
0.69
0.56
0.46
0.36


10.16-17.78
0.81
0.66
0.46
0.36


17.78-38.10
1.14
0.91
0.76
0.61


38.10-63.50
1.52
1.22
1.14
0.91


63.50-88.90
1.91
1.52
1.52
1.22









It is also believed that PVC compounds of the present invention can be used in the formation of flexible industrial curtains which also require excellent flame retardancy and low smoke generation. Non-limiting examples of industrial curtain include warehouse entrance curtains, welding curtains, and freezer curtains (including those at retail food stores where frozen food items are on display in open display conditions.)


Further evidence of the invention is found in the following examples.


EXAMPLES

Table 2 shows the sources of ingredients for all Examples and all Comparative Examples. Table 3 shows the processing conditions for making all experimental samples.












TABLE 2





Ingredient
Chemical Name
Purpose
Company







SUSP RESIN 240F
PVC Homopolymer
PVC Resin
OxyVinyls



Resin


SUSP RESIN
PVC Homopolymer
PVC Resin
OxyVinyls


OV220F
Resin


SYNPLAST TOTM
Trioctyltrimellitate
Plasticizer
PolyOne


ELECTRICAL


SYNPLAST 810TM
8, 10 Linear
Plasticizer
PolyOne


ELECTRICAL
Trimellitate


SYNPLAST NOTM
Nonyl Octyl Linear
Plasticizer
PolyOne


ELECTRICAL
Trimellitate


DP-45
Brominated
Plasticizer
Chemtura



Phthalate


SYNPLAST DOS
Dioctylsebicate
Plasticizer
PolyOne


ELECTRICAL


SANTICIZER 2148
Aryl Phosphate
Plasticizer
Ferro


DRAPEX 6.8
Epoxidized
Plasticizer
Chemtura



Soybean Oil


CAPA PL1000
Polycaprolactone
Plasticizer
Perstorp


CAPA 6500
Polycaprolactone
Plasticizer
Perstorp


CAPA 6250
Polycaprolactone
Plasticizer
Perstorp


CAPA 6400
Polycaprolactone
Plasticizer
Perstorp


CAPA 6430
Polycaprolactone
Plasticizer
Perstorp


CAPA 6800
Polycaprolactone
Plasticizer
Perstorp


NAFTOSAFE 1927
CaZn Stabilizer
Heat
Chemson


SV

Stabilizer


NAFTOSAFE PKP-
Mixed Metal
Heat
Chemson


717
Stabilizer
Stabilizer


NAFTOSAFE PKP-
CaZn Stabilizer
Heat
Chemson


1152

Stabilizer


MARK 4716
BaZn Liquid
Heat
Galata



Stabilizer
Stabilizer
Chemicals


CHEMSON EH-554
Mixed Metal
Heat
Chemson



Stabilizer
Stabilizer


MARK 1900
Tin Stabilizer
Heat
Galata




Stabilizer
Chemicals


REAPAK B-NT
Co-Stabilizer
Co-Heat
Reagens


7444
booster
Stabilizer


MARK 2225
Tin Stabilizer
Heat
Chemtura




Stabilizer


THERMOLITE
Tin Stabilizer
Heat
Arkema


890S

Stabilizer


THERMOLITE 813
Tin Stabilizer
Heat
Arkema




Stabilizer


BURGESS 30
Calcined Clay
Filler
Burgess


ATOMITE
Calcium Carbonate
Filler
Imerys


OMYACARB UFT
Calcium Carbonate
Filler
Omya


ULTRAPFLEX
Calcium Carbonate
Filler
Specialty





Minerals


APYRAL 40CD
Aluminum
Flame
Nabaltec



Trihydrate
Retardant


HYMOD 9400 SF
Treated Aluminum
Flame
Huber



Trihydrate
Retardant
Engineered





Materials


CHARMAX LSZST
Zinc Stannate
Flame
PAG—Polymer




Retardant
Additives





Group


KEMGARD MZM
Zinc Molybdate
Smoke
Sherwin



Complex
Suppressant
Williams


CAMPINE MT
Antimony Oxide
Flame
Campine




Retardant


SIDISTAR T120
Proprietary Blend
Flame
Elkem




Retardant


EMERSOL 132
Stearic Acid
Lubricant
Emery





Oleo-





chemicals


PARALOID K-175
Acrylic Process Aid
Process Aid/
Dow




Lubricant
Chemical


PE AC-629A
Oxidized
Lubricant
Honeywell



Polyethylene Wax


CALCIUM
Calcium Stearate
Lubricant
Chemtura


STEARATE, FN


WESTON EHDP
Phosphite
Phosphite Co
Chemtura




Stabilizer


WESTON 618F
Phosphite
Phosphite Co
Chemtura




Stabilizer


ULTRANOX 626
Phosphite
Phosphite Co
Chemtura




Stabilizer


LOWINOX CA 22
Antioxidant
Antioxidant
Chemtura


IRGANOX 1076
Antioxidant
Antioxidant
BASF


IRGANOX 1010
Antioxidant
Antioxidant
BASF


KANE ACE PA-20
Acrylic Resin
Acrylic
Kaneka




Process Aid


GEON MB2756
Acrylic Resin
Functional
PolyOne


NAT

Acrylic


DYNEON
PVDF Compound
PVDF
3M


320080009-PVDF

Copolymer




Compound
















TABLE 3





Mixing Instructions


#4 Roll Mill/10 L Henschel/Banbury



















Standard Conditions







Resin
Initial



STABILIZER (Solids & Liquids)
Directly after Resin



Plasticizer
Directly after Resin



Processing Aids
Directly after Resin



Lubricants
Directly after Resin



Fillers
Directly after Resin



Pigments
Directly after Resin



Titanium Dioxide
Directly after Resin



Polycaprolactone Pellets
140° F. (60° C.)



Henschel Drop Temp
<155° F. (<68° C.)



Cooler Drop Temp
140-150° F. (60-65° C.)











Transfer Powder to Banbury












Set jacket at 300-310° F. (149-154° C.) & speed to 100 rpm



Raise ram twice before dropping fused material ~260° F. & 290° F.



(~127° C. & 143° C.)



Drop Compound at 315-335° F. (157-168° C.) (note sucking sound



when fused) ~325° F. (~163° C.)



Drop Plenum at 340° F. (171° C.) (note sucking sound when fused)











#4 Mill Conditions










Compound












Initial #4 mill roll set up:
Front
Back







Mill rolls Temps:
340° F.
325° F.




(171° C.)
(163° C.)



Roll speed:
18 rpm
22 rpm









Roll gap: 75-90 mils (1.9-2.3 mm)



Mill for 4 minutes.



Set gap ~ 5-10 mils (0.13-0.25 mm) greater than plaque thickness.



Remove mill strip and cut out 6″ × 6″ (15.24 cm × 15.24 cm)



samples for testing.










Table 4 identifies the physical tests performed.













TABLE 4






Testing
Test




Test Name
Authority
No.
Variations
Units







Specific Gravity
ASTM
D792




Durometer Hardness, A,
ASTM
D2240
Shore A



Instant


Durometer Hardness, A,
ASTM
D2240
Shore A



15 sec delay


Durometer Hardness, D,
ASTM
D2240
Shore D



Instant


Durometer Hardness, D,
ASTM
D2240
Shore D



15 sec delay


Flame: LOI Oxygen
ASTM
D2863

%


Index



Oxygen


Flexible Tensile
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


100% Modulus
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


Elongation
ASTM
D638
type IV
%


Cone Calorimeter PHR
ASTM
E1354
flux 75 kW/m2
kW/m2


Cone Calorimeter THR
ASTM
E1354
flux 75 kW/m2
MJ/m2


Cone Calorimeter
ASTM
E1354
flux 75 kW/m2
m2/kg


AvgSEA


Cone Calorimeter
ASTM
E1354
flux 75 kW/m2
m2/m2


TOTSMK


Brittleness of Plastic
ASTM
D746
2° C.
° C.





increments


Tear Strength
ASTM
D624

ppi


Flex Tensile - Oven
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


Aged 7 Days 100 C.


100% Modulus
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


Elongation
ASTM
D638
type IV
%


Retention of Tensile
UL
444

%


Retention of Elongation
UL
444

%


Flex Tensile - Oven
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


Aged 7 Days 121 C.


100% Modulus
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


Elongation
ASTM
D638
type IV
%


Retention of Tensile
UL
444

%


Retention of Elongation
UL
444

%


Flex Tensile - Oven
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


Aged 14 Days 136 C.


100% Modulus
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


Elongation
ASTM
D638
type IV
%


Retention of Tensile
UL
444

%


Retention of Elongation
UL
444

%


Flex Tensile - Oven
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


Aged 10 Days 100 C.


100% Modulus
ASTM
D638
type IV
psi


Elongation
ASTM
D638
type IV
%


Retention of Tensile
UL
444

%


Retention of Elongation
UL
444

%


Dynamic Thermal
ASTM
D2538

min.


Stability


DTS 205′C 100 rpm first
ASTM
D2538

min.


color


DTS Torque @ 15 min.
ASTM
D2538

mg


Temperature @ 15 min.
ASTM
D2538

° C.


Torques at 5 minutes
ASTM
D2538

mg


DTS 10 min torque value
ASTM
D2538

mg


DTS Torque
ASTM
D2538

mg









Tables 5-14 identify the formulations of the various series of experiments leading unexpectedly to the invention and the physical properties of such experiments using the tests identified in Table 4.


All experiments will be explained prior to the display of Tables 5-14. The objective of the experiments was to identify formulations which satisfied the following four conditions:


Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI) of >60%;


Elongation at Break of >150%;


Brittleness of <0° C., and preferably <−5° C.; and


Dynamic Thermal Stability (DTS) of >25 min, and preferably >30 min.


Series 1


Series 1 explored the possibility of replacing a trimellitate plasticizer with a polycaprolactone plasticizer in a conventional polyvinyl chloride compound used for insulation. The increase in LOI from Experiment 1-A to any of 1-B-1-E showed merit in continued experimentation, even though the LOI was less than 60%.


Series 2


Series 2 also explored the possibility of replacing a trimellitate plasticizer with a polycaprolactone plasticizer, but this time in a conventional low smoke polyvinyl compound used for jacketing. Experiment 2-A was a control. The progression of increasing polycaprolactone content in Experiments 2-B-2-E demonstrated that better formulations used less than about 40 phr of polycaprolactone, even though the DTS condition was not yet met. The extremes of Experiments 2-F, 2-G, and 2-H demonstrated that both brominated phthalate plasticizer and polycaprolactone would be preferred for use in the formulations in order to meet the above-listed conditions. The Experiments 2-1 and 2-J are also controls, with Experiment 2-I being a repeat of Experiment 2-A and Experiment 2-J being the use of 100% PVDF.


Series 3


Experiments 3-A and 3-B were successful in meeting the above-listed conditions, achieved with a combination of 33% plasticizer content of trimellitate and 67% plasticizer content of polycaprolactone. Experiment 3-C showed the addition of calcium carbonate harmed that positive result, while the presence of calcium stearate was acceptable for a successful formulation. Experiments 3-D-3-F used PVDF unsuccessfully, because the formulations were too brittle among other problems.


Series 4


Experiments 4-A-4-H explored the use of various grades of polycaprolactone with the selection of all of Capa™ grades 6250, 6400, 6430, 6500, and 6800 yielding successful formulations.


Series 5


Experiments 5-A-5-H explored the variations in polyvinyl chloride resins, the thermal stabilizer content, and other minor ingredients. Unfortunately, none of these variations improved the performance from Series 4.


Series 6


Experiments 6-A-6-F explored the variations in polyvinyl chloride resins, the amounts of plasticizer, the amounts of thermal stabilizer, the presence of phosphite, and the presence of epoxidized soybean oil. Again, none of these variations improved the performance from Series 4.


Series 7


Series 7 explored variations in polyvinyl chloride resin selection, type of Naftosafe heat stabilizer, amount of Paraloid processing aid, amount of calcium stearate internal lubricant, and the amounts if any of phosphite and tin stabilizer. Unpredictably, the four conditions were met by Experiments 7-A and 7-F, using different polyvinyl chloride resins, different types of Naftosafe heat stabilizer, different amounts of Paraloid processing aid, different amounts of calcium stearate, and different amounts of phosphite. This Series demonstrated the establishment of about a 2:3 ratio of brominated phthalate plasticizer:polycaprolactone was a suitable ratio of plasticizer for providing successful formulations of the invention. Based on this establishment, the ratio of brominated phthalate plasticizer:polycaprolactone can range from about 1:2 to about 1:1 and preferably from about 1:2 to about 3:4.


Series 8


Series 8 explored the addition of conventional bis-phenol stabilizers and anti-oxidants, without success.


Series 9


Series 9 explored the use of the silane treated aluminum trihydrate and also the use of butyl and octyl tin stabilizers, phosphite stabilizers, and co-stabilizer booster in the formulations. Experiments 9-B, 9-C, and 9-D were unsuccessful, because the plastic brittleness was too high. Those Experiments added butyl tin, octyl tin, and octyl tin maleate stabilizers, respectively, something to avoid in formulating of the PVC compounds. Of this Series 9, Experiment 9-G also demonstrated that Weston 618F distearyl pentaerythritol diphosphite was a promising candidate for lowering the Brittleness temperature. With this establishment, the distearyl pentaerythritol diphosphite can be used in an amount ranging from about 0.2 to about 2 and preferably from about 0.5 to about 1.5 parts per hundred of poly(vinyl chloride) resin.


Series 10


Experiment 10-A was a control similar to Experiment 2-A of a conventional low smoke jacketing compound. Experiment 2-A appeared to be a promising candidate, but it failed the UL-910 test after the compound was formed into a covering of ˜0.050 inch thickness for a fiber optic cable having a core diameter of 0.803 inch. Experiment 10-B was a formulation focusing on the use of Weston EHDP phosphite stabilizer and dimethyl tin mercaptan stabilizer. Experiment 10-B was also a promising candidate and also passed the UL-910 test for two of three cables, with the third being a failure because of circumstances related to processing issues. On the basis of this initial result in the UL-910 test, this formulation was the starting point for the variations in Series 11 and Series 12 experiments.


Series 11


Experiments 11A, 11B, and 11C explored the proper balance of stabilizer components. A comparison between Experiment 11-A and 11-B showed that distearyl pentaerythritol diphosphite stabilizer was a valuable ingredient, even at only 1 phr. A comparison of Experiment 11-B and 11-C showed that the presence of dimethyl tin mercaptan diminished performance unacceptably by increasing Brittleness temperature markedly. Experiments 11-D and 11-E repeated the 11-B vs. 11-C comparison using a different polyvinyl chloride resin, demonstrating the robustness of the formulations of Experiments 11-B and 11-D.


Series 12


Experiments 12-A-12-C repeated the formulation of Experiment 11-D. Including Experiment 11-D, the four experiments yielded successful physical property results all four times, demonstrating the robustness of the formulation of Experiments 11-D and 12-A-12-C as a preferred embodiment of the invention.











TABLE 5









Experiments
















1-A
1-B
1-C
1-D
1-E
2-A
2-B
2-C



















SUSP RESIN 240F
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00


SYNPLAST TOTM ELECTRICAL
52.00


SYNPLAST 810TM ELECTRICAL





33.00
0.00
0.00


DP-45





22.00
22.00
16.50


SYNPLAST DOS ELECTRICAL





0.00
0.00
0.00


SANTICIZER 2148





0.00
0.00
0.00


CAPA PL1000

52.00
45.00


CAPA 6500



52
45
0.00
33.00
38.50


NAFTOSAFE 1927 SV
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717





8.00
8.00
8.00


BURGESS 30
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00


ATOMITE
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00


APYRAL 40CD





43.00
43.00
43.00


HYMOD 9400 SF





43.00
43.00
43.00


CHARMAX LSZST





10.00
10.00
10.00


KEMGARD MZM





7.50
7.50
7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


Sidistar T120





0.00
0.00
0.00


EMERSOL 132
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


PARALOID K-175





1.20
1.20
1.20


PE AC-629A
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.20


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.33
1.38
1.40
1.39
1.40
1.63
1.67
1.65


Durometer Hardness, A, Instant
94
94
97
95
97
97
96
97


Durometer Hardness, A, 15 sec delay
89
88
93
90
93
96
95
95


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
53
51
60
56
63
65
70
69


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec delay
37
36
45
40
47
55
55
54


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index
27.7
30.4
31.4
31.7
33.6
55.6
62.6
61.4


Flexible Tensile
2700
2960
3150
2570
2640
2160
2210
2210


100% Modulus
1880
1930
2280
1980
2200
1820
1830
1780


Elongation
309
315
304
282
304
221
265
265


Cone Calorimeter PHR





134
74
82


Cone Calorimeter THR





61
59
64


Cone Calorimeter AvgSEA





296
88
104


Cone Calorimeter TOTSMK





2049
680
810


Brittleness of Plastic
−20
−19
−13
−25
−24
−7
−8.4
−10.4


Dynamic Thermal Stability





62
17
15


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 100 C.





2140
2170
2120


100% Modulus





1860
1860
1820


Elongation





212
253
249


Retention of Tensile





99%
98%
96%


Retention of Elongation





96%
95%
94%


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 121 C.
3030
3130
3110
2830
2910


100% Modulus
2060
2170
2560
2120
2270


Elongation
335
305
256
341
361


Retention of Tensile
112% 
106% 
99%
110% 
110% 


Retention of Elongation
108% 
97%
84%
121% 
119% 


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 14 Days 136 C.
2920
3010
3100
2820
2940


100% Modulus
2800
2870
2990
2290
2650


Elongation
235
224
142
315
251


Retention of Tensile
108% 
102% 
98%
110% 
111% 


Retention of Elongation
76%
71%
47%
112% 
83%


DTS 10 min torque value





530
1120
1130


10 MHz - DC
2.91
4.11
3.92
3.77
3.74


10 MHz - DF
0.0396
0.0626
0.0527
0.0476
0.0419


















TABLE 6









Experiments
















2-D
2-E
2-F
2-G
2-H
2-I
2-J
3-A



















SUSP RESIN 240F
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00

100.00


SYNPLAST 810TM ELECTRICAL
0.00
0.00
33.00
0.00
33.00
33.00

11.00


DP-45
11.00
5.50
11.00
0.00
0.00
22.00

22.00


SYNPLAST DOS ELECTRICAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.00
0.00


SANTICIZER 2148
0.00
0.00
11.00
11.00
22.00


CAPA 6500
44.00
49.50
0.00
33.00
0.00


22.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00

8.00


APYRAL 40CD
43.00
43.00
18.00
56.00
56.00
43.00

40.00


HYMOD 9400 SF
43.00
43.00
55.00
30.00
30.00
43.00

40.00


CHARMAX LSZST
10.00
10.00
7.50
7.50
7.50
10.00

15.00


KEMGARD MZM
7.50
7.50
10.00
10.00
10.00
7.50

7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00

2.00


PARALOID K-175
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20

1.20


PE AC-629A
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20

0.20


DYNEON 32008 0009-PVDF






100.00
0.00


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.64
1.63
1.59
1.59
1.57
1.63
1.82
1.66


Durometer Hardness, A, Instant
96
96
97
94
96


Durometer Hardness, A, 15 sec delay
94
94
94
89
92


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
67
65
62
53
56
68
58
69


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec delay
52
50
49
40
43
56
46
55.1


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index
59.1
58.8
44.2
43.9
39.1
55.0
>80
62.3


Flexible Tensile
2110
2110
1400
1990
2000
1980
1210
2190


100% Modulus
1760
1640

1280
1360
2000
1200
1960


Elongation
244
287
82
311
275
204
204
247


Cone Calorimeter PHR
82
86
128
101
140
131
49
83.4


Cone Calorimeter THR
66
73
72
95
80
63
38
53.6


Cone Calorimeter AvgSEA
131
183
409
264
377
292
5
5745


Cone Calorimeter TOTSMK
960
1282
2613
1967
2496
2006
60
1145


Brittleness of Plastic
−13.6
−17
−7.4
−30.2
−20.8
−7
−37
−10.2


Dynamic Thermal Stability
12
11
90
26
69
>90
>90
40


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 100 C.
2170
2180
1520
2040
2010


2240


100% Modulus
1810
1750

1660
1510


1990


Elongation
263
273
58
274
249


245


Retention of Tensile
103%
103%
109%
103%
101%


102%


Retention of Elongation
108%
 95%
 71%
 88%
 91%


 99%


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 121 C.





1980
1230
2260


100% Modulus






1240
2200


Elongation





91
145
173


Retention of Tensile





100%
102%
103%


Retention of Elongation





 45%
 1%
 70%


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 10 Days 100 C.







2200


100% Modulus







1950


Elongation







248


Retention of Tensile







100%


Retention of Elongation







100%


DTS 205′ C. 100 rpm first color







23


DTS Torque @ 15 min.





526
1132
1014


DTS 10 min torque value
1160
1200
300
810
410


















TABLE 7









Experiments
















3-B
3-C
3-D
3-E
3-F
4-A
4-B
4-C



















SUSP RESIN 240F
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00


SYNPLAST 810TM ELECTRICAL
11.00
11.00
11.00
11.00
11.00
33.00
0.00
0.00


DP-45
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00


CAPA 6500
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


CAPA 6250





0.00
33.00
0.00


CAPA 6400





0.00
0.00
33.00


NAFTOSAFE 1927 SV
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.50
4.50


NAFTOSAFE PKP-1152





4.50
4.50
4.50


OMYACARB UFT
0.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00


APYRAL 40CD
39.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
37.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


HYMOD 9400 SF
39.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


CHARMAX LSZST
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
10.00
10.00
10.00


KEMGARD MZM
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


PARALOID K-175
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20


PE AC-629A
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20


CALCIUM STEARATE, FN
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40


KANE ACE PA-20
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.50
0.00


GEON MB2756 NAT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.50


DYNEON 32008 0009-PVDF
0.00
0.00
115.40
114.20
114.20


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.66
1.66
1.70
1.65
1.6565
1.63
1.67
1.67


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
67.8
68.3
66.1
67.6
62.5
66.1
69.6
66.7


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec delay
54
53.6
49.1
52.5
45.3
54.7
55.2
55.1


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index
60.6
57.1
55.9
53.1
52.7
53
62.6
62.2


Flexible Tensile
2230
2070
1340
1870
1330
1990
2110
2080


100% Modulus
1790
1810

1840
1300
1730
1840
1780


Elongation
275
219
61.6
140
106
186
209
225


Cone Calorimeter PHR
95.9
94.6


Cone Calorimeter THR
55.3
52.7


Cone Calorimeter AvgSEA
6032
6623


Cone Calorimeter TOTSMK
1366
1417


Brittleness of Plastic
−11
−10.4
9.6
11.2
10.6
−7.8
−5
−6


Dynamic Thermal Stability
68
55
>90
70
70
159
60
59


Tear Strength





396
472
498


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 121 C.
2130
2170
1120
2050
1340
2010
2010
2060


100% Modulus
1850
1880

1970

1830
1830
1840


Elongation
231
235
88
158
68
160
208
223


Retention of Tensile
96%
105%
 84%
110%
101%
101%
 95%
 99%


Retention of Elongation
84%
107%
143%
113%
 64%
 86%
100%
 99%


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 100 C.
2210
2180
1080
1970
1290
1800
2100
2170


100% Modulus
1830
1790

1920

1610
1790
1810


Elongation
254
255
96
146
102
165
228
217


Retention of Tensile
99%
105%
 81%
105%
 97%
 90%
100%
104%


Retention of Elongation
92%
116%
156%
104%
 96%
 89%
109%
 96%


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 10 Days 100 C.
2070
2120
1120
1830
1260
1800
2000
2130


100% Modulus
1710
1770
1080
1780
1030
1640
1760
1790


Elongation
252
258
127
141
114
158
210
242


Retention of Tensile
93%
102%
 84%
 98%
 95%
 90%
 95%
102%


Retention of Elongation
92%
118%
206%
101%
108%
 85%
100%
108%


DTS 205′ C. 100 rpm first color
43
43
53
43
43
63
43
43


DTS Torque @ 15 min.
860
867
812
1040
750
490
966
1009


















TABLE 8









Experiments
















4-D
4-E
4-F
4-G
4-H
5-A
5-B
5-C



















SUSP RESIN 240F
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
100.00


SYNPLAST 810TM ELECTRICAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.00
22.00


DP-45
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00


CAPA 6500
0.00
33.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.00
33.00
33.00


CAPA 6250
0.00
0.00
0.00
22.00
11.00


CAPA 6430
33.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


CAPA 6800
0.00
0.00
33.00
0.00
0.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
0.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-1152
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
8.00


ULTRAPFLEX





0.00
0.00
2.00


APYRAL 40CD
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
42.00


HYMOD 9400 SF
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
42.00


CHARMAX LSZST
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00


KEMGARD MZM
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


PARALOID K-175
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20


PE AC-629A
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20


CALCIUM STEARATE, FN





0.00
0.50
0.50


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.66
1.64
1.66
1.65
1.66


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
68.7
69.2
68.2
65.4
64.4
71.1
67
66.4


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec delay
55
56.4
55.9
52.9
55
57.2
55
55.7


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index
61.4
61.9
62.4
59.3
53


Flexible Tensile
2100
2150
2270
2030
2150
2312
2001
2274


100% Modulus
1710
1730
1710
1690
1830
1878
1618
1829


Elongation
262
268
309
239
222
264
284
270


Brittleness of Plastic
−7.6
−10
−12.8
−6
−6.4


Dynamic Thermal Stability
49
46
29
101
152
26
39
34


Tear Strength
499
511
536
455
461


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 121 C.
2110
2210
2240
2670
2080


100% Modulus
1900
1910
1830
2240
1920


Elongation
196
241
296
224
177


Retention of Tensile
100%
103%
 99%
132%
 97%


Retention of Elongation
 75%
 90%
 96%
 94%
 80%


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 100 C.
2200
2250
2380
2120
2270


100% Modulus
1980
1950
1930
1850
1930


Elongation
213
246
299
215
217


Retention of Tensile
105%
105%
105%
104%
106%


Retention of Elongation
 81%
 92%
 97%
 90%
 98%


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 10 Days 100 C.
2000
1880
2110
2050
2190


100% Modulus
1540
1810
1730
1780
1870


Elongation
207
208
270
220
229


Retention of Tensile
 95%
 87%
 93%
101%
102%


Retention of Elongation
 79%
 78%
 87%
 92%
103%


DTS 205′ C. 100 rpm first color
33
23
20
43
53


DTS Torque @ 15 min.
1152
1254
1424
750
604
514
407
463


















TABLE 9









Experiments
















5-D
5-E
5-F
5-G
5-H
6-A
6-B
6-C



















SUSP RESIN 240F
0.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


SUSP RESIN OV220F
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00


DP-45
22.00
20.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
21.00
21.00


DRAPEX 6.8
0.00
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00


CAPA 6500
33.00
30.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
31.00
31.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717
0.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-1152
8.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
8.00
8.00
5.00


MARK 4716
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


MARK 1900
0.00
0.00
2.50
4.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00


REAPAK B-NT 7444
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50


ULTRAPFLEX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00


APYRAL 40CD
43.00
43.00
43.00
45.00
44.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


HYMOD 9400 SF
43.00
43.00
43.00
45.00
44.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


CHARMAX LSZST
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00


KEMGARD MZM
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


PARALOID K-175
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20


PE AC-629A
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20


CALCIUM STEARATE, FN
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50


WESTON EHDP
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.50
1.00
1.50


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.65
1.63
1.65


1.64
1.64
1.64


Durometer Hardness, A, Instant


Durometer Hardness, A, 15 sec delay


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
63.6
64.4
66.4


67.1
67.1
66.4


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec delay
51.5
49.7
50.6


52.5
52.1
50.7


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index





59.8
59.2
56.4


Flexible Tensile
2067
2070
2033


2021
2098
2010


100% Modulus
1648
1617
1684


1708
1729
1705


Elongation
277
282
237


257
259
246


Dynamic Thermal Stability
48
45
39


41
47
48


DTS Torque @ 15 min.
367
412
390


DTS Torque





426
372
367


















TABLE 10









Experiments
















6-D
6-E
6-F
7-A
7-B
7-C
7-D
7-E



















SUSP RESIN 240F [DPK]
0.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00


SUSP RESIN OV220F
100.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


DP-45
21.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00


DRAPEX 6.8
3.00
5.00
3.00


CAPA 6500
31.00
30.00
31.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717
3.00
3.00
3.00
8.00
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50


NAFTOSAFE PKP-1152
5.00
5.00
5.00
0.00
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50


MARK 1900
1.50
0.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
1.00
0.75


APYRAL 40CD
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


HYMOD 9400 SF
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


CHARMAX LSZST
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00


KEMGARD MZM
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


PARALOID K-175
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90


PE AC-629A
0.25
0.20
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


CALCIUM STEARATE, FN
0.75
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50


WESTON EHDP
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.63
1.65
1.64
1.66
1.66
1.66
1.65
1.66


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
63.7
64.8
62.2
69.8
66.8
65.2
64.8
67.9


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec delay
46.7
50.2
45.7
55.9
51.6
51.2
49.7
51.9


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index
53.3
58.9
54.9
61.8
59.4
61.4
58.5
59.2


Flexible Tensile
2030
1975
2246
2298
2217
2253
2241
2228


100% Modulus
1856
1765
1959
1926
1775
1832
1801
1877


Elongation
190
206
218
304
292
266
257
246


Brittleness of Plastic



−5
−11
>−2
>−2
>−2


Dynamic Thermal Stability
73
48
57
40
43
45
37
34


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 100 C.



2288
2195
2168
2275
2254


100% Modulus



1983
1814
1895
1989
1934


Elongation



294
280
235
225
242


Retention of Tensile



100%
99%
96%
102%
101%


Retention of Elongation



 97%
96%
88%
 88%
 98%


DTS 10 min torque value



1250
1024
863
800
891


DTS Torque
241
357
294


















TABLE 11









Experiments
















7-F
7-G
8-A
8-B
8-C
8-D
8-E
8-F



















SUSP RESIN 240F
0.00
0.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00


SUSP RESIN OV220F
100.00
100.00


DP-45
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00


CAPA 6500
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50


NAFTOSAFE PKP-1152
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50


MARK 1900
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15


APYRAL 40CD
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


HYMOD 9400 SF
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


CHARMAX LSZST
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00


KEMGARD MZM
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


PARALOID K-175
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90


PE AC-629A
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


CALCIUM STEARATE, FN
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50


WESTON EHDP
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


LOWINOX CA 22


0.00
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00


IRGANOX 1076


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00


IRGANOX 1010


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75
0.00


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.66
1.66
1.64
1.66
1.65
1.64
1.64
1.64


Durometer Hardness, A, Instant


100
99.7
98.4
98
98.5
96.2


Durometer Hardness, A, 15 sec delay


98.9
98.2
97.3
97.5
97.1
95.3


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
64.2
66.4
69.4
69
69.3
68.1
69
66


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec delay
49.6
50.7
55.6
53.1
56.7
54
55.9
53.5


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index
59.1
61.1


Flexible Tensile
2115
2167
2370
2379
2405
2395
2355
2246


100% Modulus
1727
1774
1914
1902
1954
1933
1841
1876


Elongation
252
269
252
285
258
268
284
232


Brittleness of Plastic
>−2
−6


Dynamic Thermal Stability
36
47
27.5
31
28
31
34
39.5


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 100 C.
2200
2226


100% Modulus
1924
1800


Elongation
228
290


Retention of Tensile
104%
103%


Retention of Elongation
 90%
108%


DTS 10 min torque value
675
897


















TABLE 12









Experiments
















8-G
8-H
9-A
9-B
9-C
9-D
9-E
9-F



















SUSP RESIN 240F
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00


DP-45
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00


CAPA 6500
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-1152
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.00


CHEMSON EH-554


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00


MARK 1900
0.30
0.45


REAPAK B-NT 7444


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00


MARK 2225


0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


THERMOLITE 890S (Octyl tin)


0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00


THERMOLITE 813 (Octyl Tin Maleate-


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00


powder)


APYRAL 40CD
43.00
43.00


HYMOD 9400 SF
43.00
43.00
86.00
86.00
86.00
86.00
86.00
86.00


CHARMAX LSZST
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00


KEMGARD MZM
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


PARALOID K-175
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90


PE AC-629A
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


CALCIUM STEARATE, FN
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50


WESTON EHDP
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.64
1.64
1.68
1.68
1.66
1.67
1.66
1.67


Durometer Hardness, A, Instant
98
93.8


Durometer Hardness, A, 15 sec delay
96.6
93.1


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
65.7
67.4
69.3
68.7
70.3
69.6
69.3
70.1


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec delay
53
53.4
54.5
53.3
54.8
53.3
53.7
55.3


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index


Flexible Tensile
2283
2108
2267
1981
2144
1965
2205
2207


100% Modulus
1874
1714
1875
1733
1850
1690
1756
1739


Elongation
246
252
252
218
223
216
254
258


Brittleness of Plastic


−7
5.4
3.4
5.2
−3.2
−4.6


Dynamic Thermal Stability
38
37.5
33
36.5
37.6
35.5
46
37


















TABLE 13









Experiments
















9-G
9-H
10-A
10-B
11-A
11-B
11-C
11-D



















SUSP RESIN 240F
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.00


SUSP RESIN OV220F




0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00


SYNPLAST NOTM ELECTRICAL


33.00


DP-45
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00


CAPA 6500
33.00
33.00

33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717
4.50
4.50
8.00
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50


NAFTOSAFE PKP-1152
4.50
4.50

4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50


MARK 1900



0.20
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00


APYRAL 40CD


43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


HYMOD 9400 SF
86.00
86.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


CHARMAX LSZST
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00


KEMGARD MZM
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


PARALOID K-175
0.90
0.90
1.20
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90


PE AC-629A
0.15
0.15
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


CALCIUM STEARATE, FN
0.50
0.50

0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50


WESTON EHDP
0.00
0.00

1.00


WESTON 618F
1.00
0.00


0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


ULTRANOX 626
0.00
1.00


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.66
1.65
1.67
1.67
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65


Durometer Hardness, A, Instant


99.1
99.7


Durometer Hardness, A, 15 sec delay


98.2
96.1


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
70.3
70.3
64.9
60
69.9
68.4
66.4
68.2


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec delay
55.4
55.1
55.3
47.3
55.1
53.2
52.4
53.1


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index


62.8
61
61.2
62.3
61.8
60.3


Flexible Tensile
2104
2166
1902
1785
2294
2153
2254
2008


100% Modulus
1726
1732
1688
1522
1838
1684
1906
1583


Elongation
239
261
205
227
250
264
219
298


Cone Calorimeter PHR


113.5
84
79
79.5
75.3


Cone Calorimeter THR


55.5
53.5
44.3
52.9
53.8


Cone Calorimeter AvgSEA


253
119
137
156
82


Cone Calorimeter TOTSMK


1710
819
1471
1074
718


Brittleness of Plastic
−7.8
−6.4
−4.2
−1.4
−7.4
−9.2
0.8
−8.4


Dynamic Thermal Stability
45
38
72
46
27
35.5
47
47


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days 121 C.




2314
2163
2330
2024


100% Modulus




1872
1888
2007
1768


Elongation




276
236
192
270


Retention of Tensile




101%
100%
103%
101%


Retention of Elongation




110%
 89%
 88%
 91%


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 10 Days 100 C.


1959
1783


100% Modulus


1819
1601


Elongation


133
207


Retention of Tensile


103%
100%


Retention of Elongation


 65%
 91%


DTS Torque @ 15 min.


520
872


Temperature @ 15 min.


210
205


Torque at 5 minutes




1022
1017
913
885


















TABLE 14









Experiments












11-E
12-A
12-B
12-C















SUSP RESIN OV220F
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00


DP-45
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00


CAPA 6500
33.00
33.00
33.00
33.00


NAFTOSAFE PKP-717
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50


NAFTOSAFE PKP-1152
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50


MARK 1900
0.20


APYRAL 40CD
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


HYMOD 9400 SF
43.00
43.00
43.00
43.00


CHARMAX LSZST
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00


KEMGARD MZM
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50


CAMPINE MT
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


PARALOID K-175
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90


PE AC-629A
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


CALCIUM STEARATE, FN
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50


WESTON 618F
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


Testing


Specific Gravity
1.65
1.66
1.66
1.66


Durometer Hardness, A, Instant

98.3
98.8
97.8


Durometer Hardness, A, 15 sec

96.5
97.6
95.4


delay


Durometer Hardness, D, Instant
66.6
68.1
69.2
66.1


Durometer Hardness, D, 15 sec
52.5
54.2
56.2
50.3


delay


Flame: LOI Oxygen Index
59.1
63.4
62.4
61.8


Flexible Tensile
1919
2068
2149
1978


100% Modulus
1634
1607
1740
1582


Elongation
252
298
290
283


Cone Calorimeter PHR



89.5


Cone Calorimeter THR



80.2


Cone Calorimeter AvgSEA



175


Cone Calorimeter TOTSMK



1334


Brittleness of Plastic
0.4
−6.4
−3.6
−7.6


Dynamic Thermal Stability
58
34
33.5
39.5


Flex Tensile - Oven Aged 7 Days
2196
2321
2187
1925


121 C.


100% Modulus
2050
2095
2017
1759


Elongation
196
213
178
225


Retention of Tensile
114%
112%
102%
97%


Retention of Elongation
 78%
 71%
 61%
80%


Torque at 5 minutes
690
894
920
872









As result of the 12 Series of experiments, it can be summarized that Experiments 3-A; 3-B; 4-B; 4-C; 4-D; 4-E; 4-F; 7-A; 7-G; 9-A; 9-E; 9-F; 9-G; 9-H; 10-B; 11-A; 11-B; 11-D; 12-A; 12-B; and 12-C are Examples of the present invention with the remainder of Experiments serving as Comparative Examples.


It has also been found via photo-micrographic evaluation that the polycaprolactone and the PVC are no less than compatible into a single phase morphology and probably are miscible together. This compatibility or miscibility aids in retention of the polymeric plasticizer to minimize undesired migration of the polycaprolactone from within the PVC or from the PVC to its surfaces or to a contiguous second material.


The invention is not limited to the above embodiments. The claims follow.

Claims
  • 1. A wire or cable covering, comprising: a mixture of (a) poly(vinyl chloride) and(b) polycaprolactone plasticizing the poly(vinyl chloride),wherein the mixture has a Limiting Oxygen Index of greater 60% according to ASTM D2863; an Elongation at Break of greater than 150% according to ASTM D638 (Type IV); a Plastic Brittleness less than 0° C. according to ASTM D746 as measured in 2° C. increments; and a Dynamic Thermal Stability of more than 25 min according to ASTM 2538.
  • 2. The wire or cable covering of claim 1, wherein the mixture also comprises brominated phthalate plasticizer.
  • 3. The wire or cable covering of claim 2, wherein the mixture has a parts per hundred of poly(vinyl chloride) resin ratio of from about 1:2 to about 1:1 of the brominated phthalate plasticizer:polycaprolactone.
  • 4. The wire or cable covering of claim 3, wherein the mixture has a parts per hundred of poly(vinyl chloride) resin ratio of about 1:2 to about 3:4 of the brominated phthalate plasticizer:polycaprolactone.
  • 5. The wire or cable covering of claim 1, wherein the mixture also comprises distearyl pentaerythritol diphosphite stabilizer.
  • 6. The wire or cable covering of claim 5, wherein the distearyl pentaerythritol diphosphite stabilizer is present in the mixture in an amount of about 0.2 to about 2 parts per hundred of poly(vinyl chloride) resin.
  • 7. The wire or cable covering of claim 1, wherein the mixture excludes dimethyl tin mercaptan.
  • 8. The wire or cable covering of claim 1, wherein the wire or cable is a plenum wire or cable.
  • 9. The wire or cable covering of claim 1, wherein the wire or cable is a riser wire or cable.
  • 10. A wire or cable, comprising a transmission core of optical fiber or metal wire and a covering of claim 1.
  • 11. The wire or cable of claim 10, wherein the wire or cable is a plenum wire or cable.
  • 12. The wire or cable of claim 10, wherein the wire or cable is a riser wire or cable.
  • 13. A method of using plasticized poly(vinyl chloride) in wire or cable covering, comprising the steps: (a) mixing polycaprolactone with polyvinyl chloride to form a plasticized polyvinyl chloride;(b) extruding the plasticized polyvinyl chloride around a transmission core of optical fiber or metal wire to form a plenum wire or cable which passes the UL-910 test.
  • 14. A plenum wire or cable, comprising: polyvinyl chloride plasticized with polycaprolactone as a covering according to the mixture of claim 1 wherein the plenum wire or cable passes the UL-910 test.
  • 15. An industrial curtain, comprising the mixture of claim 1.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/720,836 bearing Attorney Docket Number 12012023 and filed on Oct. 31, 2012, which is incorporated by reference.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61720836 Oct 2012 US