Use of silicide block process to camouflage a false transistor

Abstract
A technique for and structures for camouflaging an integrated circuit structure. A layer of conductive material having a controlled outline is disposed to provide artifact edges of the conductive material that resemble an operable device when in fact the device is not operable.
Description

This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/758,792 entitled “Circuit Protection Implemented Using a Double Polysilicon Layer CMOS Process” filed on Jan. 11, 2001 by J. P. Baukus, Lap Wai Chow and W. C. Clark.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to integrated circuits (ICs) and semiconductor devices in general and their methods of manufacture wherein the integrated circuits and semiconductor devices employ camouflaging techniques which make it difficult for the reverse engineer to discern how the semiconductor device functions.


RELATED ART

The present invention is related to the following US patents by some of the same inventors as the present inventors:

    • (1) U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,866,933; 5,783,375 and 6,294,816 teach connecting transistors in a CMOS circuit by implanted (and therefore hidden and buried) lines between the transistors. The implanted lines are formed by modifying the p+ and n+ source/drain masks. These implanted interconnections are used to make 3-input AND or OR circuits look substantially identical to the reverse engineer. Also, buried interconnects force the reverse engineer to examine the IC in greater depth to try to figure out the connectivity between transistors and hence their function.
    • (2) U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,783,846; 5,930,663 and 6,064,110 teach modifying the source/drain implant masks to provide a gap in the implanted connecting lines between transistors. The length of the gap being approximately the minimum feature size of the CMOS technology being used. If this gap is “filled” with one kind of implant, the line conducts; but if it is “filled” with another kind of implant, the line does not conduct. The intentional gaps are called “channel blocks.” The reverse engineer is forced to determine connectivity on the basis of resolving the implant type at the minimum feature size of the CMOS process being used.
    • (3) U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,762 teaches a method and an apparatus for protecting semiconductor integrated circuits from reverse engineering. Semiconductor active areas are formed on a substrate and a silicide layer is formed over at least one active area of the semiconductor active areas and over a selected substrate area. The silicide layer connecting the at least one active area with another active area.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The creation of complex integrated circuits and semiconductor devices can be an expensive undertaking because of the large number of hours of sophisticated engineering talent involved in designing such devices. Additionally, integrated circuits can include read only memories and/or EEPROMs into which software, in the form of firmware, is encoded. Further, integrated circuits are often used in applications involving the encryption of information. In order to keep the encrypted information confidential, devices should be protected from being reverse engineered. Thus, there can be a variety of reasons for protecting integrated circuits and other semiconductor devices from being reversed engineered.


In order to keep the reverse engineer at bay, different techniques are known in the art to make integrated circuits more difficult to reverse engineer. One technique is to make the connections between transistors difficult to determine forcing the reverse engineer to perform a careful analysis of each transistor (in particular, each CMOS transistor pair for CMOS devices), and thwarting attempts to use automatic circuit and pattern recognition techniques in order to reverse engineer an integrated circuit. Since integrated circuits can have hundreds of thousands or even millions of transistors, forcing the reverse engineer to analyze each transistor carefully in a device can effectively frustrate the reverse engineer's ability to reverse engineer the device successfully.


A conductive layer, such as silicide, is often used during the manufacture of semiconductor devices. In modern CMOS processing, especially with a minimum feature size below 0.5 μm, a silicide layer is utilized to improve the conductivity of gate, source and drain contacts. In accordance with typical design rules, any active region resulting in a source/drain region is silicided.


One reverse engineering technique involves de-layering the completed IC by means of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) or other etching processes. The etching processes may, under some conditions, reveal the regions between where the silicide was formed on the substrate, and where it was not, i.e. the regions defined by the silicide block mask step and by regions where structures, such as a polysilicon gate, prevent the silicide layer from being deposited on the substrate. These regions may be revealed because, under some kinds of etches, there is an observable difference in topology due to different etching rates for silicided vs. pure silicon. The reverse engineer, by noting the silicided areas vs. non-silicided areas, may make reasonable assumptions as to the function of the device. This information can then be stored into a database for automatic classification of other similar devices.


Some methods of protecting against reverse engineering may be susceptible to discovery under some reverse engineering techniques, such as chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) or other etching techniques. For example, FIG. 1a depicts a possible top-down view of a false transistor made in accordance with U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/758,792 after etching. During the manufacturing of the false transistor, and in accordance with normal design rules, the silicide block mask allows for a silicide layer 15, see FIG. 1b, to be placed completely over the active regions 12, 16, and optionally over gate layer 14. Gate layer 14 may be a polysilicon layer. During the CMP process, the gate layer 14 would be removed, thereby resulting in the top-down view as shown in FIG. 1a. As shown, the silicide layer edge 18 aligns with the gate edge 11, 13, thus the reverse engineer only sees one line along the gate edge 11, 13.


As will be described below, the top-down view of the false transistor is different from a top-down view of a true transistor and as such, the difference may be a signature that the transistor is not a true transistor.


For functional or true transistors, as shown in FIGS. 2a and 2b, the silicide layer edge 18′ is offset from the polysilicon gate layer 14 due to the presence of sidewall spacers 19 that are formed adjacent to gate layer 14. A light doped density (LDD) implant 10 is typically formed after the formation of the gate layer 14 and before the formation of the sidewall spacers. After sidewall spacers 19 are formed, active areas 12, 16 are typically formed in the substrate. The formation of active areas 12, 16 saturate most of the LDD implant, so that only the portion of the LDD implant 10 that is under the sidewall spacers 19 effectively remains. A conductive layer, such as silicide, is typically placed over the active areas 12, 16 and the gate layer 14. The gate layer 14 and sidewall spacers 19, prevent the silicide from being deposited upon the substrate in those areas. Thus, the artifact edge 18′ is spaced from and lies mostly parallel with the edges 11, 13 of the gate layer 14 for a true transistor. Thus, from the examination of the top-down view the reverse engineer may be able to determine that a structure originally placed in the area was in fact a false transistor meant to confuse the reverse engineer due to the absence of artifact edges 18′ lying spaced from and mostly parallel with edges 11, 13 of the polysilicon gate 14. A reverse engineer could then program computer software to recognize the absence of artifact edges 18′ of the silicide layers lying separate from and being mostly parallel with the edges 11, 13 of the gate layer 14 as indications of false transistors. One skilled in the art will appreciate that although FIG. 1b depicts active regions 12, 16 adjacent to the gate region 14 and FIG. 2b depicts LDD implants 10 adjacent to the gate region 14, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the reverse engineer to determine the different doping levels of the LDD implant 10 and the active regions 12, 16.


Therefore, a need exists to provide a semiconductor device and a method of manufacturing semiconductor devices that uses artifact edges to confuse the reverse engineer. Providing artifact edges that are not indicative of the actual device formed will further confuse the reverse engineer and result in incorrect conclusions as to the actual composition, and thus function, of the device.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One aspect of this invention is to make reverse engineering even more difficult and, in particular, to confuse the reverse engineer's study of the artifacts revealed during the reverse engineering process by providing artifacts that are not indicative of the underlying processing and circuit features. The result is that the reverse engineer is given large reason to doubt the validity of typical conclusions. It is believed that it will not only be time consuming to reverse engineer a chip employing the present invention but perhaps impractical, if not impossible.


Another aspect of the present invention is that it does not rely upon modifications or additions to the function of the circuitry that is to be protected from reverse engineering, nor does it require any additional processing steps or equipment. Instead, a highly effective deterrent to reverse engineering is accomplished in a streamlined manner that adds neither processing time nor complexity to the basic circuitry.


The Inventors named herein have previously filed Patent Applications and have received Patents in this general area of technology, that is, relating to the camouflage of integrated circuit devices in order to make it more difficult to reverse engineer them. The present invention can be used harmoniously with the techniques disclosed above in the prior United States Patents to further confuse the reverse engineer.


The present invention might only be used once in a thousand of instances on the chip in question. Thus, the reverse engineer will have to look very carefully at each transistor or connection. The reverse engineer will be faced with having to find the proverbial needle in a haystack.


Another aspect of the present invention is a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device in which a conductive layer block mask is modified resulting in reverse engineering artifacts that are misleading and not indicative of the true structure of the device.


An aspect of the present invention is to provide a camouflaged circuit structure, comprising: a gate layer having a first gate layer edge and a second gate layer edge; a first active area disposed adjacent said first gate layer edge; a second active area disposed adjacent said second gate layer edge; and a conductive layer having a first artifact edge and a second artifact edge, said conductive layer partially formed over said first active area and said second active area; wherein said first artifact edge of said conductive layer is offset from said first gate layer edge, and said second artifact edge of said conductive layer is offset from said second gate layer edge.


Another aspect of the present invention is a method of confusing a reverse engineer comprising the steps of: providing a false semiconductor device without sidewall spacers having at least one active region; and forming a conductive layer partially over the at least one active region such that an artifact edge of said conductive layer of said false semiconductor device without sidewall spacers mimics an artifact edge of a conductive layer of a true semiconductor device having sidewall spacers.


Another aspect of the present invention is a method of camouflaging an integrated circuit structure comprising the steps of: forming the integrated circuit structure having a plurality of active areas; and forming a conductive block layer mask to thereby form artifact edges of a conductive layer that are located in a same relative locations for non-operational transistors without sidewall spacers as well as operational transistors with sidewall spacers.


Another aspect of the present invention is a method of protecting an integrated circuit design comprising the steps of: modifying a silicide block mask used during the manufacture of a false transistor such that edges of a silicide layer for the false transistor are placed in substantially the same relative locations as edges of a silicide layer for a true transistor; and manufacturing said integrated circuit.


Another aspect of the present invention is a circuit structure comprising: a gate layer having a first gate layer edge and a second gate layer edge; a first active area, said first active area being formed during a single processing step, said first active area having a width, said first active area formed adjacent said first gate layer edge; a second active area, said second active area being formed during a single processing step, said second active area having a width, said second active area formed adjacent said second gate layer edge; a conductive layer having a first artifact edge and a second artifact edge, said conductive layer being formed over said first active area and over said second active area, a width of said conductive layer formed over said first active area being less than said width of said first active area, a width of said conductive layer formed over said second active area being less than said width of said second active area.


Another aspect of the present invention is a method of hiding a circuit function comprising the steps of: forming at least one active region of a device with a single processing step, said at least one active region having a width; and forming a conductive layer partially over the at least one active region wherein a width of said conductive layer is less than the width of the at least one active region.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1
a depicts artifact edges of a silicide layer that the reverse engineer could see after all the metal and oxide layers have been removed from a false transistor;



FIG. 1
b depicts a cross-section of a false transistor;



FIG. 2
a depicts prior art artifact edges of a silicide layer that the reverse engineer could see after all the metal and oxide layers have been removed from a true transistor;



FIG. 2
b depicts a cross-section of a prior art true transistor;



FIG. 3
a depicts artifact edges of a silicide layer that the reverse engineer could see after all the metal and oxide layers have been removed from a false transistor in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3
b depicts a cross-section of a false transistor in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 4 depicts an example of a silicide layer block mask to be used in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which an embodiment of the invention is shown. This invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiment set forth herein.


Many methods of manufacturing semiconductor devices are well known in the art. The following discussion focuses on modifying a conductive layer block mask used during the manufacture of semiconductor devices in order to confuse the reverse engineer. The discussion is not intended to provide all of the semiconductor manufacturing details, which are well known in the art.


In order to confuse the reverse engineer, the placement of an artifact edge of a silicide layer that would be seen when a reverse engineer examines devices manufactured with other reverse-engineering-detection-prevention techniques is changed. In reverse-engineering-detection-prevention techniques, false, or non-operational, transistors are used along with true, or operational, transistors. Some false transistors are manufactured without sidewall spacers, see FIG. 1b, while corresponding true transistors may well have sidewall spacers 19, as shown in FIG. 2b. From a top-down view, and through most reverse engineering techniques, these false transistors look the same as operational transistors. However, under some reverse engineering techniques, such as chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) or other etching processes, the artifact edges of the silicide layer may give away the reverse-engineering-detection-prevention technique. As shown in FIG. 1a, for some non-operational transistors, the artifact edges 18 of a silicide layer 15 coincide with the edges 11, 13 of the gate layer 14. However, with operational transistors as shown in FIG. 2a, the artifact edges 18′ of a silicide layer 15 are offset from the edges 11, 13 of the gate layer 14 by the width of sidewall spacers 19.



FIG. 3
a is a top-down view and FIG. 3b is a cross-sectional view of a false transistor in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 3a depicts artifact edges 18″ of a conductive layer 15 that do not coincide with the edges 11, 13 of gate layer 14. A conductive layer block mask 21, see FIG. 4, is preferably modified to prevent the silicide layer 15 from covering the entire active areas 12, 16. The conductive layer 15 is partially formed over a first active area 12 and a second active area 16. The result is that the conductive layer 15 has a cross-sectional width 151 that is smaller than the cross-sectional width 121, 161 of the active areas 12, 16. Thus, when a reverse engineering process, such as CMP or other etching process, is used, the artifact edges 18″ of the conductive layer 15 do not give away the fact that the transistor is a false transistor. Instead, the artifact edges 18″ are offset by a distance 17, see FIG. 3a, from the gate layer 14, with distance 17 having a width that is preferably approximately equivalent to the width of one typical sidewall spacer, as if sidewall spacers were present. Therefore, the reverse engineer can no longer rely on the placement of the artifact edges 18 of conductive layer 15 to determine if a transistor is a true transistor or a false transistor.


One skilled in the art will appreciate that the conductive layer block mask 21 will require different modifications depending on the feature size of the device. The offset distance 17 between the artifact edge 18″ of the conductive layer 15 and the edge 11, 13 of the gate layer 14 is preferably approximately equal to the width of the sidewall spacers, which varies depending on the feature size of the device. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the difference between the width of the sidewall spacer 19 and the width of the offset 17 should be within the manufacturing tolerances for the process used, and thus the offset 17 and the width of the sidewall spacer 19 are approximately equal. For 0.35 μm technology, for example, the sidewall spacer width is approximately 0.09 μm. For typical CMOS processes, the conductive layer 15 will be silicide while the gate layer 14 will be polysilicon. One skilled in the art will appreciate that regardless of the feature size of the device, the person laying out the masks should place the artifact edges 18″ of the conductive layer 15 for a false transistor in substantially the same relative locations as the artifact edges 18′ of the conductive layer 15 for a true transistor. Thus, the reverse engineer will be unable to use the artifact edges 18 of the conductive layer 15 to determine if the transistor is a true transistor or a false transistor.


Additionally, false transistors manufactured in accordance with the invention are preferably used not to completely disable a multiple transistor circuit, but rather to cause the circuit to function in an unexpected or non-intuitive manner. For example, what appears to be an OR gate to the reverse engineer might really function as an AND gate. Alternatively, what appears as an inverting input might really be non-inverting. The possibilities are endless and are almost sure to cause the reverse engineer so much grief that he or she would give up as opposed to pressing forward to discover how to reverse engineer the integrated circuit device on which this technique is utilized.


Having described the invention in connection with certain preferred embodiments thereof, modification will now certainly suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, except as is specifically required by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of protecting an integrated circuit design comprising: defining a silicide block mask used during the manufacture of a false transistor such that edges of a silicide layer disposed over source and drain regions of the false transistor are placed in substantially the same relative locations as edges of a silicide layer for a true transistor; andmanufacturing said integrated circuit using a single processing step to form said source and drain regions of said false transistor.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the integrated circuit design has both false and true transistors and wherein the false and true transistors each have a gate region and also gate and drain regions which at least appear in plan view to be active regions associated with said gate regions.
  • 3. A method of claim 1, wherein the edges of the silicide layer for the false transistor are placed in substantially the same relative locations adjacent a gate region, but without utilizing sidewall spacers to define said edges, as corresponding edges of the silicide layer for the true transistor with sidewall spacers.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said single processing step forms said active regions of said false transistor each with a dopant concentration which follows a smooth curve from an adjacent gate layer edge to a central portion of each active region beneath the silicide layer.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the single processing step to form said source and drain regions of said false transistor forms said active regions each having a dopant concentration which follows a smooth curve from an adjacent gate edge to a central portion of each respective source or drain region.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 wherein said source and drain regions are disposed immediately on either side of a gate region with no LDD region associated therewith.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein said source and drain regions are disposed immediately on either side of a gate region of said false transistor with no LDD region associated therewith.
  • 8. A method of hiding a circuit function of a circuit, the method comprising the steps of: forming at least one active region of a device with a single processing step, said at least one active region having a width; andforming a conductive layer partially over the at least one active region wherein a width of said conductive layer is less than the width of the at least one active region so that the conductive layer yields an artifact edge, when subjected to reverse engineering techniques, which is in a conventionally anticipated location for a conventionally operational version of the circuit, but wherein the circuit, due to the width of the at least one active region, functions in an unanticipated fashion to a reverse engineer who is unaware that said method has been practiced on said circuit.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 wherein said device is non-operable.
  • 10. The method of claim 8 wherein a difference between the width of the at least one active region and the width of the conductive layer is approximately equal to a width of a sidewall spacer.
  • 11. The method of claim 8 wherein the at least one active region is disposed adjacent a channel region associated with a gate contact.
  • 12. A method of protecting an integrated circuit design comprising: defining a silicide block mask used during the manufacture of a false transistor such that at least one edge of a silicide layer disposed over at least one active region of the false transistor is placed in substantially the same relative location to a gate region thereof as an edge of a silicide layer for a true transistor; andmanufacturing said integrated circuit using a single processing step to form said at least one active region of said false transistor, the at least one active region corresponding to a source or drain region having a dopant concentration which follows a smooth curve from an adjacent gate edge to a central portion of the at least one active region.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the integrated circuit design has both false and true transistors and wherein the false and true transistors each have a gate region and also regions which at least appear in plan view to be active regions associated with said gate regions.
  • 14. A method of claim 12, wherein the at least one edge of the silicide layer for the false transistor is placed in substantially the same relative location, but without utilizing a sidewall spacer to define said at least one edge, as a corresponding edge of the silicide layer for the true transistor with sidewall spacers.
  • 15. A method of protecting an integrated circuit design comprising: forming at least one active region in a substrate of an integrated circuit incorporating said integrated circuit design, the at least one active region having a dopant concentration which follows a smooth curve from an adjacent gate edge to a central portion of the at least one active region, the at least one active region forming a portion of a false transistor; andutilizing a silicide block mask during the manufacture of the false transistor such that an edge of a silicide layer disposed over said at least one active region of the false transistor is spaced from a gate of said false transistor by a gap without forming a LDD region under said gap.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein spacing the silicide layer from the gate of the false transistor yields an artifact edge when subjected to reverse engineering techniques, which artifact edge is in a conventionally anticipated location for a true transistor, but wherein the false transistor, due to an edge of the at least one active region extending beyond said artifact edge, functions in an unanticipated fashion to a reverse engineer who is unaware that said method has been practiced on said integrated circuit.
  • 17. The method of claim 15 wherein spacing the silicide layer from the gate of the false transistor yields an artifact edge when subjected to reverse engineering techniques, the artifact edge being placed at a distance from the gate edge corresponding to a width of a conventional LDD region, said at least one active region having no LDD region associated therewith.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/208,470 filed on Aug. 18, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,344,932, which application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/637,848 filed on Aug. 7, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,979,606, which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/428,634 filed Nov. 22, 2002, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (142)
Number Name Date Kind
3673471 Klein et al. Jun 1972 A
3946426 Sanders Mar 1976 A
4017888 Christie et al. Apr 1977 A
4101344 Kooi et al. Jul 1978 A
4139864 Schulman Feb 1979 A
4164461 Schilling Aug 1979 A
4196443 Dingwall Apr 1980 A
4267578 Vetter May 1981 A
4291391 Chatterjee et al. Sep 1981 A
4295897 Tubbs et al. Oct 1981 A
4314268 Yoshioka et al. Feb 1982 A
4317273 Guterman et al. Mar 1982 A
4322736 Sasaki et al. Mar 1982 A
4374454 Jochems Feb 1983 A
4409434 Basset et al. Oct 1983 A
4435895 Parillo Mar 1984 A
4471376 Morcom et al. Sep 1984 A
4530150 Shirato Jul 1985 A
4581628 Miyauchi et al. Apr 1986 A
4583011 Pechar Apr 1986 A
4603381 Guttag et al. Jul 1986 A
4623255 Suszko Nov 1986 A
4727038 Watabe Feb 1988 A
4727493 Taylor, Sr. Feb 1988 A
4753897 Lund et al. Jun 1988 A
4766516 Ozdemir et al. Aug 1988 A
4799096 Koeppe Jan 1989 A
4821085 Haken et al. Apr 1989 A
4829356 Arndt May 1989 A
4830974 Chang et al. May 1989 A
4939567 Kenney Jul 1990 A
4962484 Takeshima et al. Oct 1990 A
4975756 Haken et al. Dec 1990 A
4998151 Korman et al. Mar 1991 A
5015596 Toyoda et al. May 1991 A
5030796 Swanson et al. Jul 1991 A
5050123 Castro Sep 1991 A
5061978 Mizutani et al. Oct 1991 A
5065208 Shah et al. Nov 1991 A
5068697 Noda et al. Nov 1991 A
5070378 Yamagata Dec 1991 A
5073812 Shimura Dec 1991 A
5101121 Sourgen Mar 1992 A
5117276 Thomas et al. May 1992 A
5120669 Schrantz Jun 1992 A
5121089 Larson Jun 1992 A
5121186 Wong et al. Jun 1992 A
5132571 McCollum et al. Jul 1992 A
5138197 Kuwana Aug 1992 A
5146117 Larson Sep 1992 A
5168340 Nishimura Dec 1992 A
5177589 Kobayashi et al. Jan 1993 A
5202591 Walden Apr 1993 A
5225699 Nakamura Jul 1993 A
5227649 Chapman Jul 1993 A
5231299 Ning et al. Jul 1993 A
5302539 Haken et al. Apr 1994 A
5308682 Morikawa May 1994 A
5309015 Kuwata et al. May 1994 A
5317197 Roberts May 1994 A
5336624 Walden Aug 1994 A
5341013 Koyanagi et al. Aug 1994 A
5345105 Sun et al. Sep 1994 A
5354704 Yang et al. Oct 1994 A
5369299 Byrne et al. Nov 1994 A
5371390 Mohsen Dec 1994 A
5376577 Roberts et al. Dec 1994 A
5384472 Yin Jan 1995 A
5384475 Yahata Jan 1995 A
5399441 Bearinger et al. Mar 1995 A
5404040 Hshieh et al. Apr 1995 A
5412237 Komori et al. May 1995 A
5441902 Hsieh et al. Aug 1995 A
5453635 Hsu Sep 1995 A
5468990 Daum Nov 1995 A
5475251 Kuo et al. Dec 1995 A
5506806 Fukushima Apr 1996 A
5531018 Saia et al. Jul 1996 A
5539224 Ema Jul 1996 A
5541614 Lam et al. Jul 1996 A
5571735 Mogami et al. Nov 1996 A
5576988 Kuo et al. Nov 1996 A
5611940 Zettler Mar 1997 A
5638946 Zavracky Jun 1997 A
5677557 Wuu et al. Oct 1997 A
5679595 Chen et al. Oct 1997 A
5719422 Burr et al. Feb 1998 A
5719430 Goto Feb 1998 A
5721150 Pasch Feb 1998 A
5783375 Twist Jul 1998 A
5783846 Baukus et al. Jul 1998 A
5821147 Kizilyalli Oct 1998 A
5821590 Lee et al. Oct 1998 A
5834356 Bothra et al. Nov 1998 A
5838047 Yamauchi et al. Nov 1998 A
5854510 Sur, Jr. et al. Dec 1998 A
5858843 Doyle et al. Jan 1999 A
5866933 Baukus et al. Feb 1999 A
5880503 Matsumoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5888887 Li et al. Mar 1999 A
5895241 Lu et al. Apr 1999 A
5920097 Horne Jul 1999 A
5930663 Baukus et al. Jul 1999 A
5930667 Oda Jul 1999 A
5933737 Goto Aug 1999 A
5973375 Baukus et al. Oct 1999 A
5977593 Hara Nov 1999 A
5998257 Lane et al. Dec 1999 A
6010929 Chapman Jan 2000 A
6037627 Kitamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6046659 Loo et al. Apr 2000 A
6054659 Lee et al. Apr 2000 A
6057520 Goodwin-Johansson May 2000 A
6064110 Baukus et al. May 2000 A
6080614 Neilson et al. Jun 2000 A
6093609 Chuang Jul 2000 A
6117762 Baukus et al. Sep 2000 A
6137318 Takaaki Oct 2000 A
6153484 Donaton et al. Nov 2000 A
6154388 Oh Nov 2000 A
6215158 Choi Apr 2001 B1
6261912 Hsiao et al. Jul 2001 B1
6294816 Baukus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6326675 Scott et al. Dec 2001 B1
6365453 Deboer et al. Apr 2002 B1
6410413 Scott et al. Jun 2002 B2
6479350 Ling et al. Nov 2002 B1
6503787 Choi Jan 2003 B1
6740942 Baukus et al. May 2004 B2
6815816 Clark, Jr. et al. Nov 2004 B1
7012273 Chen Mar 2006 B2
7091114 Ito et al. Aug 2006 B2
7242063 Chow et al. Jul 2007 B1
20010042892 Okada et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020058368 Tseng May 2002 A1
20020173131 Clark, Jr. et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030057476 Morita et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030173622 Porter et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040061186 Chow et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040099912 Chow et al. May 2004 A1
20040144998 Chow et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040164361 Baukus et al. Aug 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
0 186 855 Jul 1986 EP
0 364 769 Apr 1990 EP
0 463 373 Jan 1992 EP
0 528 302 Feb 1993 EP
0 585 601 Mar 1994 EP
0 764 985 Mar 1997 EP
0 883 184 Dec 1998 EP
0 920 057 Jun 1999 EP
1 193 758 Apr 2002 EP
1 202 353 May 2002 EP
2 486 717 Jan 1982 FR
58-190064 Nov 1983 JP
61-147551 Jul 1986 JP
63-129647 Jun 1988 JP
02-046762 Feb 1990 JP
02-188944 Jul 1990 JP
02-237038 Sep 1990 JP
04-028092 Jan 1992 JP
10-256398 Sep 1998 JP
9821734 May 1998 WO
9857373 Dec 1998 WO
0044012 Jul 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 10/828,022, filed Apr. 19, 2004, Chow et al.
Blythe, et al., “Layout Reconstruction of Complex Silicon Chips,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 138-145 (Feb. 1993).
Frederiksen, Thomas M., “Standard Circuits in the New CMOS Era,” Intuitive CMOS Electronics, Revised Edition, pp. 134-146 (Jan. 1989).
Hodges and Jackson, Analysis and Design of Digital Integrated Circuits, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, p. 353 (1988).
IBM—TDB, “Double Polysilicon Dynamic Memory Cell with Polysilicon Bit Line,” vol. 21, Issue No. 9, pp. 3828-3831 (Feb. 1979).
IBM—TDB, “Static Ram Double Polysilicon Process,” vol. 23, Issue No. 8 pp. 3683-3686 (Jan. 1981).
Larson, L.E., et al., “Microactuators for GaAs-based Microwave Integrated Circuits,” IEEE, pp. 743-746 (1991).
Lee, “Engineering a Device for Electron-Beam Probing,” IEEE Design and Test of Computers, pp. 36-49 (Jun. 1989).
Ng, K.K., Complete Guide to Semiconductor Devices, McGraw-Hill, Inc., pp 164-165 (1995).
Sze, S.M., VLSI Technology, McGraw-Hill, pp. 99, 447, 461-465 (1983).
Sze, S.M., ed., “Silicides for Gates and Interconnections,” VLSI Technology, McGraw-Hill, pp. 372-380 (1983).
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60428634 Nov 2002 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11208470 Aug 2005 US
Child 11932169 US
Parent 10637848 Aug 2003 US
Child 11208470 US