USE OF SODIUM ACID SULFATE AS A DISINFECTANT

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20100098782
  • Publication Number
    20100098782
  • Date Filed
    October 08, 2009
    14 years ago
  • Date Published
    April 22, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
Animal carcasses are disinfected by applying to the animal carcass an aqueous solution of sodium acid sulfate that does not include a chlorine-containing composition. The solution is maintained at from about pH 1.0 to about pH 2.5 and can optionally include a second acid such as citric acid, lactic acid, or combinations thereof.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Animal carcasses intended for food use are generally treated with a disinfectant. A wide variety of disinfectants have been used. Chlorine has been used as a sterilizing and sanitizing agent. This has been applied as a gas or as an aqueous solution of a chlorine-containing compound. In particular, acidified solutions of chlorites, as well as acidified solutions of chlorous acid or chlorine dioxide, have been used as topical antibacterial agents. Warf, Jr. et al. pending application 2007/0042094 discloses the use of a blend of sodium acid sulfate and a metal chlorite for use in disinfecting carcasses. Sodium acid sulfate has also been used in combination with solutions of chlorine dioxide to disinfect carcasses. In both of these applications, the sodium acid sulfate is used purely to convert the metal chlorite to ClO2 and/or chlorous acid, and is not disclosed to have any disinfecting capability.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is premised on the realization that sodium acid sulfate can be used by itself without a chlorine generating compound such as a metal chlorite or chlorine dioxide to disinfect animal carcasses. In particular, sodium acid sulfate disinfects carcass surfaces between about pH 1.5-2.5. Inorganic acids may be added as buffers.


Further, the sodium acid sulfate can be used by itself for direct food contact disinfection without the addition of any other antibacterial agents in many different applications.


The solutions of sodium acid sulfate (SAS) are less corrosive than mineral acids and do not fume. Further, SAS has a lower pH than phosphoric acid and does not contribute to eutrophication of lakes and streams. It is particularly suited for disinfecting vegetables and fruits, including lettuce and spinach.


The objects and advantages of the present invention will be further appreciated in light of the following detailed description and drawings.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

According to the present invention, an aqueous solution of sodium acid sulfate is used as a surface disinfectant particularly suitable for direct food contact. In one particular application, the sodium acid sulfate is used as a disinfectant for animal carcasses, and, in particular, poultry.


In the preparation of animal carcasses for consumption, the carcass is cleaned and all feathers are removed from poultry. With respect to mammals, the hide is generally removed. Then, either prior to butchering or subsequent to butchering, the animal carcass is treated with a disinfecting solution intended to reduce the amount of bacteria present on the animal carcass. The disinfecting solution is an aqueous solution of sodium acid sulfate having a pH of 1.5 to 2.5, with typically about 2.0.


Sodium acid sulfate can be applied using typical carcass treatment apparatus. The SAS solution can be applied either as a spray or in a dip tank to contact the carcass with the solution for a period of a few seconds up to several minutes, typically 1 to 30 seconds.


The disinfecting solution is substantially free of chlorine-generating compositions, metal chlorites, chlorine dioxide, chlorous acid, or the like. “Substantially free” means that the concentration of any chlorine-containing compound in the solution is so low it has no significant disinfecting property. Generally, chlorine dioxide will not exhibit a significant antimicrobial effect at less than 0.1 ppm. Further, the composition will generally not contain any salt, such as sodium chloride, in a concentration that would have antimicrobial properties.


The disinfecting solution is applied to the animal carcass at room temperature, about 22° C.


The aqueous solution of sodium acid sulfate is formed simply by dissolving solid sodium acid sulfate in water. The actual use concentration of the sodium acid sulfate may be from about 2000 to about 10,000 ppm, depending upon the particular application. The cleaning solution should be less than pH 2.5 and, preferably, less than about pH 2.25.


Depending upon the concentration of the sodium acid sulfate in the solution, the desired pH can be achieved by adding either a mineral base such as sodium hydroxide to raise the pH. With lower concentrations of sodium acid sulfate, inorganic or organic acids such as citric acid, lactic acid, tartaric acid, or even hydrochloric acid, can be added to lower the pH and provide pH buffering capacity.


In addition to the SAS and any optional acid, the disinfecting solution can include a wetting agent, generally an anionic or nonionic GRAS listed surfactant. In particular, 0.5% of sodium dodecyl sulfate (use concentration) is suitable as a wetting agent. In addition to cleaning animal carcasses, the disinfecting solution can be used to clean a variety of different surfaces, such as fruits and vegetables, and food processing equipment. This is particularly beneficial because the SAS solution does not adversely affect the taste of the food. This invention will be further appreciated in light of the following detailed examples.


Example 1

The germicidal effectiveness of 4000 ppm of sodium acid sulfate was tested at various levels of pH. The pH of the solutions was adjusted by addition of sodium hydroxide. The test method was A Modification of the Germicidal and Detergent Sanitizing Action of Disinfectants, A.O.A.C., 17th Edition 2000. The test organism was Escherichia coli, ATCC #11229 (560,000 org/ml), which was contacted with the sodium acid sulfate for 10 seconds and 30 seconds at 25° C. The recovery medium was Tryptone Glucose Extract Agar with Asolectin and Tween 80. Phosphate Buffer 0.2M was employed. The results in terms of organisms per milliliter are shown in Table 1.












TABLE 1









10 Seconds Contact
30 Seconds Contact












Survivors

Survivors



pH
(org/ml)
% Reduction
(org/ml)
% Reduction














1.49
43,000,000
92.321
40,300,000
92.804


1.59
63,300,000
88.696
57,500,000
89.732


1.70
51,800,000
90.750
46,000,000
91.785


1.79
43,000,000
92.321
34,500,000
93.839


1.89
40,300,000
92.804
31,500,000
94.375


1.99
175,000,000
68.750
102,000,000
81.785


2.11
103,000,000
81.607
96,000,000
82.857


2.18
115,000,000
79.464
107,000,000
98.089


2.29
105,000,000
81.250
77,000,000
86.250


2.39
133,000,000
76.250
128,000,000
77.142


2.49
159,000,000
71.607
156,000,000
72.142









Example 2

In order to determine the antimicrobial effectiveness of the present invention, Salmonella enteriditis at 120,000,000 organisms per milliliter was contacted for 30 seconds, 1 minute, or 2 minutes, with 2,000 ppm SAS, or 4,000 ppm SAS at the indicated pH. The neutralizer was 0.2M Phosphate Buffer, pH 7.0, and the growth medium was 3M Aerobic Count Petrifilm using an incubation time of 4 days at 35° C. The results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.













TABLE 2









30 Seconds Contact
1 Minute Contact
2 Minutes Contact
















Survivors
%
Survivors
%
Survivors
%


Product
pH
(org/ml)
Reduction
(org/ml)
Reduction
(org/ml)
Reduction

















4000 ppm
1.5
4,600,000
96.167
7,000
99.994
60
>99.999


SAS

8,600,000
92.833
29,000
99.976
4,000
99.997



1.75
6,900,000
94.250
4,000,000
96.667
700,000
98.933




8,500,000
92.917
1,900,000
98.417
1,400,000
98.833



2.0
20,100,000
83.250
6,500,000
94.583
4,600,000
96.167




18,600,000
84.500
2,600,000
97.833
10,300,000
91.417



2.25
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<79.167




>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<79.167



2.5
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<79.167




>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<79.167




















TABLE 3









30 Seconds Contact
1 Minute Contact
2 Minutes Contact
















Survivors
%
Survivors
%
Survivors
%


Product
pH
(org/ml)
Reduction
(org/ml)
Reduction
(org/ml)
Reduction

















2000 ppm
1.5
11,700,000
90.250
46,000
99.962
10
>99.999


SAS

17,700,000
85.250
21,000
99.983
20
>99.999



1.75
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<97.917
970,000
98.192




>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<97.917
220,000
98.817



2.0
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<97.917
>25,000,000
<97.917




>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<97.917
>25,000,000
<97.917



2.25
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<97.917
>25,000,000
<97.917




>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<97.917
>25,000,000
<97.917



2.5
>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<97.917
>25,000,000
<97.917




>25,000,000
<79.167
>25,000,000
<97.917
>25,000,000
<97.917









These results indicate that, at less than pH 2.5 and, particularly less than 2.0, the antimicrobial activity of sodium acid sulfate is greatly enhanced.


Although the present invention is suitable in a wide variety of applications involving food contact disinfection, it is particularly suitable for disinfecting animal carcasses.


Example 3

In order to test the efficacy of the composition of the present invention for use in treating animal carcasses, freshly killed whole birds were dipped and completely immersed in 13 liters of treatment solution for 10 seconds. Thereafter, the carcasses were removed and allowed to drain for 10 seconds before being placed in a 2-liter bag containing 400 milliliters of peptone solution (200 liters of peptone was poured into the bag prior to introducing the carcass, and 200 milliliters of peptone was poured into the bird cavity immediately after putting the carcass into the bag). The growth medium was 3M Aerobic Count Petrifilm. The incubation was 2-3 days at 35° C. The solutions tested were 2,000 ppm of SAS at initial pH of 1.6, 4,000 ppm of SAS at initial pH of 1.56, as well as 2,000 ppm of SAS with 600 ppm of lactic acid, 1,000 ppm of SAS with 1,200 ppm of lactic acid, and 2,400 ppm of lactic acid and 4,800 ppm of lactic acid respectively. The results of the test are shown in Table 4.













TABLE 4








Average




Weight
Organisms/
Organisms/
%


Treatment
(grams)
Bird
Bird
Reduction



















Control - no treatment
2528
1,560,000
2,304,000
N/A



2306
4,360,000



2354
1,320,000



2106
2,400,000



2328
1,880,000


2000 ppm SAS
2390
584,000
576,000
75.0


Pre 5 bird dip: pH 1.60
2352
536,000


Post 5 bird dip: pH 1.78
2182
660,000



2734
520,000



2098
580,000


4000 ppm SAS
2448
396,000
618,400
73.2


Pre 5 bird dip: pH 1.56
2696
528,000


Post 5 bird dip: pH 1.75
2244
392,000



1758
476,000



2365
1,300,000


2000 ppm SAS + 600 ppm Lactic Acid
1998
1,090,000
1,460,400
36.6


Pre 5 bird dip: pH 1.80
2188
376,000


Post 5 bird dip: pH 1.94
1884
3,360,000



1954
1,800,000



2026
676,000


1000 ppm SAS + 1200 ppm Lactic Acid
2156
584,000
576,000
75.0


Pre 5 bird dip: pH 1.80
2058
536,000


Post 5 bird dip: pH 1.98
2110
660,000



2024
520,000



2234
580,000


2400 ppm Lactic Acid
2038
600,000
2,054,800
10.8


Pre 5 bird dip: pH 1.80
1958
1,074,000


Post 5 bird dip: pH 1.96
2094
2,120,000



2070
3,240,000



1986
3,240,000


4800 ppm Lactic Acid
2496
1,000,000
1,430,000
37.9


Pre 5 bird dip: pH 1.80
2140
1,800,000


Post 5 bird dip: pH 1.96
2502
1,400,000



2068
1,520,000









As shown in Table 4, both 2000 ppm and 4000 ppm of SAS perform well. Also, the addition of lactic acid at lower concentrations of the SAS appears to be beneficial. The lactic acid itself, however, appears to provide relatively little antimicrobial effect.


The same test was repeated using commercially available products, FreshFx C12, and Eden, comparing these with sodium acid sulfate and sodium acid sulfate in combination with citric acid. The results are shown in Table 5.













TABLE 5








Average




Weight
Organisms/
Organisms/
%


Treatment
(grams)
Bird
Bird
Reduction



















Wash Control
2294
1,720,000
2,176,000
N/A



2396
3,800,000



2982
3,080,000



2394
1,000,000



2472
1,280,000


1% FreshFx C12
2476
308,000
244,800
88.8



2422
24,000



2346
280,000



2486
512,000



3456
100,000


2% FreshFX C12
3198
44,000
111,200
94.9



3106
52,000



2292
392,000



2476
20,000



2950
48,000


1% Eden less
2294
1,520,000
528,000
75.7


surfactant
2396
136,000



2982
444,000



2394
252,000



2472
292,000


2% Eden less
2460
112,000
120,000
94.5


surfactant
2656
176,000



2090
88,000



2706
124,000



2134
100,000


2000 ppm SAS
2986
556,000
246,400
88.7



3362
128,000



2032
264,000



2218
88,000



2410
196,000


SAS and citric acid
2764
588,000
408,000
81.3


2000 ppm SAS
2596
416,000


1000 ppm Citric Acid
2476
628,000



2034
LE



1966
408,000









A further embodiment of the present invention incorporates sodium acid sulfate in combination with lactic acid and citric acid. The citric acid and lactic acid appeared to enhance the activity of the sodium acid sulfate. This solution, in turn, can then be used for a direct food contact disinfectant. In such composition, the concentration of the sodium acid sulfate will be from about 0.1 to about 1.0% by weight. The concentration of the lactic acid should be from about 0.1 to about 1.0% by weight, with the concentration of the citric acid being from about 0.1 to about 1.0% by weight. Other acids that can be substituted in this composition include acetic, succinic, oxalic, tartaric, malic and alphahydroxybutyric acids. This composition can be utilized with a pH of 1.5 to 2.5, or more, particularly 1.6 to 1.8.


This can be used in any direct food contact applications, including cleaning of fruits and vegetables, animal carcasses, hard surfaces, and the like. The present invention allows the use of sodium acid sulfate in a wide variety of disinfecting applications establishing comparable efficacy to other products that are currently marketed for such applications. The present invention further has the benefit that sodium acid sulfate is a relatively mild acid, less corrosive than acids such as sulfuric, hydrochloric and nitric. Further, it does not fume, and has no significant ventilation requirements, thus making it more user friendly.


This has been a description of the present invention along with the preferred method of practicing the present invention. However, the invention itself should only be defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of disinfecting carcasses comprising coating said carcass with a solution of sodium acid sulfate wherein said solution does not include an antimicrobial effective amount of a chlorine-containing compound.
  • 2. The method claimed in claim 1 wherein said solution is less than pH 2.5.
  • 3. The method claimed in claim 2 wherein said solution is from about pH 1.5 to about pH 2.5.
  • 4. The method claimed in claim 1 wherein said solution further includes a second acid selected from the group consisting of lactic acid, citric acid, and combinations thereof.
  • 5. The method claimed in claim 5 wherein said second acid is present in an amount of from about 1,000 to about 10,000 ppm.
  • 6. A method of cleaning a hard surface comprising applying to said surface a solution consisting essentially of sodium acid sulfate and optionally a second acid selected from the group consisting of lactic acid, citric acid and mineral acids, and combinations thereof.
  • 7. The method claimed in claim 6 wherein said solution is from about pH 1.5 to about pH 2.5.
  • 8. A method of cleaning a hard surface comprising applying to said surface a solution consisting of sodium acid sulfate at pH 1.5 to 2.5.
  • 9. The method claimed in claim 1 wherein said carcass is dipped in said solution.
  • 10. The method claimed in claim 1 wherein said carcasses are sprayed with said solution.
  • 11. A method of cleaning produce comprising applying to said produce a solution of SAS at about pH 1.5 to about pH 2.5.
  • 12. The method claimed in claim 11 wherein said solution further includes citric acid.
  • 13. The method claimed in claim 12 wherein said solution further includes lactic acid
  • 14. The method claimed in claim 11 wherein the concentration of SAS in said solution is 1,000 to 10,000 ppm.
  • 15. The method claimed in claim 12 wherein the concentration of citric acid in said solution is 1,000 to 10,000 ppm.
  • 16. The method claimed in claim 13 wherein the concentration of lactic acid in said solution is 1000 to 10,000 ppm.
  • 17. A method of disinfecting the surface of an object comprising applying to a surface of said object a solution consisting essentially of SAS and optionally one or more of the following, an organic acid, a mineral acid, and a wetting agent wherein said solution is less than pH 2.25.
  • 18. A cleaning solution comprising 1,000 to 10,000 ppm SAS;1,000 to 10,000 ppm citric acid;1,000 to 10,000 ppm lactic acid;and water.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61106061 Oct 2008 US