Patent Application
20240130988
The present invention relates to the field of pharmaceuticals, and in particular to the use of stilbene compounds in the preparation of anti-tumor medicaments.
CD8+ T lymphocytes are cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and can kill tumor cells and block the spread of tumors. Following administration of a medicament, if the concentration of CD8+ T lymphocytes in solid tumor tissues is significantly increased, that is, the solid tumor tissue is rich in CD8+ T lymphocytes, the anticancer effect of the medicament will be achieved.
In addition, the internal blood supply of malignant tumors and their surrounding blood vessels are abundant. If a medicament can act on vascular endothelial cells of tumors, and cause active blood vessels to undergo inflammatory reactions, the vessels will swell and be blocked, and thus cutting off the blood flow and the nutrition supply in the tumors can make tumor cells gradually die of starving, thereby, the antitumor effects can be reached.
In the previous investigation, the present inventors have found that styrene acid derivatives have a certain specific targeting effect on tumor blood vessels, can inhibit tumor growth, but cannot kill tumor cells, especially those at the edge of solid tumor tissues, and thus the tumor tissues crossing the edge may rapidly proliferate, resulting in poor therapeutic effects on tumors.
If a medicament is provided that can enrich CD8+ T lymphocytes in solid tumor tissues and block the blood flow in tumors, it will have great application prospects for anti-tumor.
The present invention provides the use of a compound represented by formula I, or salts thereof, or stereoisomers thereof, or solvates thereof in the preparation of anti-tumor medicaments and/or medicaments for preventing and/or treating eye diseases:
wherein, M is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, sodium, potassium, calcium, ammonium or an organic amine;
Further, the organic amine is selected from the group consisting of amino acids, peptides, tert-butylamine or n-butyl amine;
Further, the compound is represented by formula II:
wherein, M is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, sodium, potassium, calcium, ammonium, meglumine, pyrazine, alanine, n-butylamine, lysine or tert-butylamine;
Further, the compound is represented by formula
wherein, M is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, sodium, potassium, calcium, ammonium, meglumine, pyrazine, alanine, n-butylamine, lysine or tert-butylarnine;
Further, the compound is represented by formula IV:
wherein, M is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, sodium, potassium, calcium, ammonium, meglumine, pyrazine, alanine, n-butylamine, lysine or tert-butylamine;
Further, the anti-tumor medicament is a medicament that has the effect of enriching CD8+ T lymphocytes in solid tumors and/or destroying the inner wall of tumor blood vessels;
Further, the anti-tumor medicament is a medicament that can inhibit tumor metastasis.
Further, when the anti-tumor medicament is a medicament that can inhibit tumor metastasis, the structure of the compound represented by formula I is as shown by formula Va:
preferably, the medicament inhibiting tumor metastasis is a medicament inhibiting melanoma metastasis.
Further, the anti-tumor medicament is a medicament for preventing and/or treating lung cancer, liver cancer, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, or renal cell carcinoma.
Further, when the anti-tumor medicament is a medicament for preventing and/or treating lung cancer, liver cancer, gastric cancer, or ovarian cancer, the structure of the compound represented by formula I is as shown by formula Va:
Further, when the anti-tumor medicament is a medicament for preventing and/or treating prostate cancer or renal cell carcinoma, the structure of the compound represented by formula I is as shown by formula Vb:
Further, the medicament for preventing and/or treating eye diseases is a medicament that inhibits the growth of ocular surface blood vessels.
Further, the eye diseases are retinopathy, fundus hemangioma, fundus hemorrhage, dacryocystitis, glaucoma, cataract, vitreous opacity, optic atrophy, macular degeneration and/or retinal detachment.
Further, the eye diseases are diabetic ophthalmopathy;
The present invention also provides a pharmaceutical preparation for treating tumors, which is a pharmaceutical preparation prepared with the above-mentioned compound, or a salt thereof, or a stereoisomer thereof, or a solvate thereof, as the active ingredient, in combination with the pharmaceutically acceptable excipients or auxiliary ingredients;
The present invention also provides the use of above-mentioned compound, or a salt thereof, or a stereoisomer thereof, or a solvate thereof, in combination with tumor immunotherapeutics, in the preparation of anti-tumor pharmaceutical compositions;
Further, the compound represented by formula Vc, or a salt thereof, or a stereoisomer thereof, or a solvate thereof is used in combination with PD-L1 in the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions for preventing and/or treating lung cancers;
Further, the compound represented by formula Va, or a salt thereof, or a stereoisomer thereof, or a solvate thereof is used in combination with T cells in the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions for preventing and/or treating liver cancers;
In the previous experiments, the inventors of the present invention have found that styrene acid derivatives have a certain specific targeting effect on tumor blood vessels, can only destroy tumor blood vessels, inhibit tumor growth, but cannot kill tumor cells, especially those at the edge of solid tumor tissues, and thus the tumor tissues crossing the edge may rapidly proliferate. On the basis of previous work, the inventors have developed a series of compounds of the present invention by structural optimization and in vivo screening, which have dual effects of enriching CD8+ T lymphocytes in solid tumor and destroying adhesion proteins of neovascular endothelial cells, and can be used to prepare anti-tumor medicaments.
The stilbene compounds with the structure of formula (I) can be used as the effective active ingredient, in combination with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients or carriers and other auxiliary materials, and processed according to corresponding general pharmaceutical procedures, and prepared as corresponding forms of vascular targeting medicaments such as oral, injection, or topical formulations. For example, after mixing with commonly used auxiliary materials such as disintegrating agents, excipients, lubricants, adhesives, and fillers that is acceptable for oral formulations, the mixture containing the compound of the present invention is processed according to the corresponding general procedures, and then oral medicaments can be obtained in the form of tablets, pills, granules, capsules, or appropriate forms of sustained release formulations, controlled release formulations, and other solid formulations; after mixing with suitable solvents and excipients that are acceptable for injection formulations and being processed as the corresponding procedures, the compound of the present invention can be prepared as intramuscular or intravenous injection formulations such as injection or powder injection; the compound of the present invention can be mixed with common solvents, stabilizers or sodium polyacrylate, polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol, glycerin, vegetable oil, vaseline, lanolin and other lipophilic and/or water-soluble bases, and processed according to corresponding procedures of topical medicaments, then prepared as eye drops or adhesive plasters, patches, gels, ointment, liniment, plastics, etc. These injection formulations (e.g. injections, sterile powder injections, and sterile freeze-dried powder injections), oral formulations (e.g. tablets, capsules, various sustained and controlled release formulations), as well as topical formulations (e.g. eye drops and ointments), can be separately used as a medicament for the treatment of solid tumors. The present invention provides the use of stilbene compounds in the preparation of anti-tumor medicaments. In the present invention, it is found that stilbene compounds have a dual effect of enriching CD+ 8T lymphocytes in solid tumors and targeting to damage the inner wall of tumor blood vessels. The stilbenes can kill tumor cells by cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen CD8+, cut off the blood supply to tumor tissues at the same time, and thus cause rapid necrosis in solid tumors, together with inhibition on tumor metastasis, thereby, the killing effects on tumors are greatly improved. Thus, the stilbene compounds of the present invention can be used in the preparation of anti-tumor medicaments, and also used in combination with tumor immunotherapeutics to achieve synergistic anti-tumor effects. Among these stilbene compounds, the compounds with different structures may have different anti-tumor effects and thus can be used in the preparation of different anti-tumor drugs. In addition, the stilbene compounds of the present invention can inhibit the growth of ocular surface blood vessels and be used in the preparation of medicaments for treating various eye diseases. Collectively, the stilbene compounds of the present invention have good application prospects.
Obviously, based on the teachings of of the present invention, according to the common technical knowledge and the conventional means in the field, those skilled in the art may make various modifications, alternations, or changes without department from the above basic technical spirits.
With reference to the following specific examples of the embodiments, the above content of the present invention is further illustrated. But it should not be construed that the scope of the above subject matter of the present invention is limited to the following examples. The techniques realized based on the above content of the present invention are all within the scope of the present invention.
The raw materials and equipments used in the specific examples of the present invention were known products obtained by purchasing commercially available products.
The structure of the stilbene compound according to the present invention is represented by formula (I):
wherein, M is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, sodium, potassium, calcium, ammonium or an organic amine (e.g. amino acids, tert-butylamine, n-butylamine, and peptides); R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 are each selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, hydroxy, methoxy, ethoxy, amino, fluorine, chlorine, or bromine.
The specific compounds of the present invention are shown in Table 1:
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 2.02 g (0.012 mol) of 2,3-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was shaken well, and then the reaction system was equipped with a magnetic stirrer, fitted with a reflux condenser, purged with nitrogen for protection, heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and reacted for 5 h at this temperature. The reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was replaced with a dropping funnel, and then 8 ml of hydrochloric acid solution was added dropwise. Then, the reaction mixture was allowed to react at 80° C. for 1 h, and then cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for additional 1 h, and then 1.8 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.17 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 1) (yield: 57.7%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 3.672 (d, 9H, 3′,4′,5′-OCH3), 3.821 (d, 3H, 4″-OCH3), 5.265 (s, 1H, 2″-OH), 5.318 (s, 1H, 3″-OH), 6.273 (s, 1H, 2′-H), 6.348 (d, 1H, 6′-H), 6,386 (d, 1H, 5″-H), 7.415 (s, 1H, 3-H), 10.982 (s, 1H, CO-OH): 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) δ 57.692, 57.826, 62.837, 109.313, 112.713, 118.627, 125.392, 129.883, 137.423 138.153, 138.232, 138.772, 146.391, 149.167, 154.482, 178.277, 16 carbon signals in total.
Preparation method: To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.82 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(2,3-dihydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxylphenyl)acrylic acid (compound 1) and 0.99 g (5.08 mmol) of N-methylglucamine, and then 15 mL of ethanol was added, The reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction mixture was heated to 60° C. in a water bath, and after the reaction solution became clear, the solution was cooled to room temperature. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and then filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2,21 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 2) (yield: 80.0%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 2.791 (d, 3H, a-CH3), 3.187 (d, 2H, a-CH2), 3.297 (d, 1H, a-CH), 3.365 (d, a-CH), 3.382 (d, 1H, a-CH), 3.516 (d, 2H, a-CH2), 3.683 (d, 4H, a-OH), 3.698 (d. 1H, a-OH), 3.713 (d, 9H, 3′,4′,5′-OCH3), 3.796 (d, 3H, 4″-OCH3), 5.159 (s, 1H, 2″-OH), 5.435 (s, 1H, 3″-OH), 6.368 (s, 1H, 2′-H), 6521 (d, 1H, 6′-H), 6.472 (d, 1H, 5″-H), 7.477 (s, 1H, 3-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) δ 34.286, 51.217, 57.692, 57.826, 62.837, 63.295, 68,786, 71.198, 73.136., 73.982, 109.313, 112.713, 118.627, 125,392, 129.883, 137.423, 138.153, 138.232, 138,772, 146.391, 149,167, 154.482, 178.277, 23 carbon signals in total.
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl acetic acid and 1.99 g (0.012 mol) of 3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer, fitted with a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and then reacted for 5 h at this temperature. Subsequently, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was replaced with a dropping funnel, and 8 ml of hydrochloric acid solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react at 80° C. for 1 h, and then the reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for additional 1 h, and then 1.8 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.25 g of (E)-3-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 60.1%).
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.81 g (4.54 mmol) of (E)-3-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid, 10 mL of absolute ethanol, and 0.5 mL of 40% NaOH solution, and the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer and stirred. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and then filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.62 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 3) (yield: 84.4%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 3.727 (d, 9H, 3′,4′,5′-OCH3), 3.869 (d, 6H, 3″,5″-OCH3), 6.174 (d, 1H, 4″-H), 6.273 (s, 1H, 2′H), 6.348 (d, 1H, 6′-H), 6.386 (d, 1H, 5″H), 6.723 (d, 2H, 2″,5″-H)), 7.329 (s, 1H, 3-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) δ 55.823, 57.314, 62.729, 108.476, 113.626, 117.196, 126.181, 128.347, 136.973, 137.826, 137.951, 137.865, 147.127, 148.331, 154,672, 171.323, 16 carbon signals in total.
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 1.85 g (0.012 mol) of 3-fluoro-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and reacted for 5 h at this temperature. After that, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was replaced with a dropping funnel, and then 8 ml of hydrochloric acid solution (1+5) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react at 80° C. for 1 h, and then the reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for additional 1 h, to which was then added 1.8 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.25 g of (E)-3-(3-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 59.3%).
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.75 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(3-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid, 10 mL of absolute ethanol, and 0.41 g of pyrazine, and the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer and stirred. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and then filtered, The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.76 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 4) (yield: 82.2%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 3.612 (d 9H, 3′,4′,5′-OCH3), 3.824 (d, 3H, 4″-OCH3), 6.287 (s 2H, 2′, 6′-H), 6.413 (s, 1H, 2″-H), 6.578 (d, 1H, 6″-H), 6.612 (d, 1H, 5″-H), 9.583 (s, 2H, C—H), 9.689 (s, 2H, C—H), 9.823 (s, 1H, 3-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) δ 56.276, 57.327, 63.196, 108.893, 113.746, 117.845, 125.637, 130.762, 138.524, 138.267 139.241, 139.482, 142.158, 146.783, 148.298, 152.930, 174.128 17 carbon signals in total.
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 2.24 g (0.012 mol) of 3-chloro-5-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. Then, the reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and reacted for 5 h at this temperature. After that, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was replaced with a dropping funnel, and 8 ml of HCl solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react at 80° C. for 1 h, and then the reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for additional I h, and then 1.8 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.13 g of (E)-3-(3-chloro-5-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl) acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 53.9%).
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.75 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(3-chloro-5- hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid, 0.45 g (5.08 mmol) of alanine, and 10 mL of absolute ethanol, and the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer, and the reaction solution was stirred. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and then filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.42 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 5) (yield: 60.6%). [M+H]+: 443.16. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, δ (ppm)): 9.972 (2H), 9.712 (2H), 7.326 (1H), 6.887 (1H), 6.865 (1H), 6.853 (1H), 3.812 (3H), 3.924 (9H), 6.615 (2H).
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 1.83 g (0.012 mol) of isovanillin, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and reacted for 5 h at this temperature. After that, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was changed to a dropping funnel, and then 8 mL
of hydrochloric acid solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react at 80° C. for 1 h, and then the reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, to which was added 12 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for additional 1 h, and then 10 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered, The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.56 g of (E)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 71.0%).
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.74 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid, 0.37 g (5.08 mmol) of n-butyl amine, and 10 mL of absolute ethanol, and the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer, to stir the reaction solution. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and then filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.68 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 6) (yield: 80.1%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 0.832 (d, 3H, a-CH3),1.329 (d, 2H b-CH3), 1.546 (d, 2H, C—CH2), 2.914 (d, 2H, d-CH3), 3.593 (d, 9H, 3′,4′,5′-OCH3), 3.749 (d, 3H, 4″-OCH3), 6.375 (s, 2H, 2′-H), 6.386 (s, 1H, 2″-B), 6.462 (d, 1H, 6″-H), 6.499 (d, 1H, 5″-H), 7.346 (s, 1H, 3-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) δ 15.103, 21.343, 31.101, 41.526, 57,788, 58.186, 63.341, 109.224, 113.626, 118.900, 125.518, 130.918, 137,718, 137.812, 138.175, 139.291, 146.588, 149.858, 154.930, 178.099, 20 carbon signals in total.
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 1.83 g (0.012 mol) of vanillin, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and allowed to react for 5 h at this temperature. Subsequently, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was changed to a dropping funnel, and then 8 mL of hydrochloric acid solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for 1 h at 80° C., and then cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was reacted for additional 1 h, and then 1.8 mL of concentrated HCl was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.74 g of (E)-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 76.0%).
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.74 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid, 0.74 g (5.08 mmol) of lysine, and 15 mL of absolute ethanol, and the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction solution was heated to 60° C. in a water bath, and after the solution became clear, it was cooled to room temperature. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and then filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.75 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 7) (yield: 71.4%). [M+H]+: 507.23. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, δ (ppm)): 1.187 (2H), 1.742 (2H), 2.116 (2H), 3.281 (2H), 3.373 (1H), 5.095 (2H), 7.386 (1H), 3.659 (3H), 5.287 (1H), 7.137 (4H), 7.349 (1H), 3.876 (9H), 6517 (2H),
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0,010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 1.83 g (0.012 mol) of 5-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and allowed to react for 5 h at this temperature. Subsequently, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was changed to a dropping funnel, and then 8 mL of hydrochloric acid solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for 1 h at 80° C., and then cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was reacted for additional 1 h, and then 1.8 mL of concentrated HCl was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.45 g of (E)-3-(5-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 64.7%).
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.74 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(5-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid, 0.37 g (5.08 mmol) of tert-butylamine, and 10 mL of absolute ethanol, and the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction solution was stirred, and the solids precipitated. Then, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.52 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 8) (yield: 69.6%). [M+H]+: 452.20. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, δ (ppm)): 1.287 (9H), 3.635 (3H), 3.831 (9H), 6.228 (2H), 7.267 (1H), 7.338 (1H), 7.643 (1H).
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 1.83 g (0.012 mol) of 2-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well, The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and allowed to react for 5 h at this temperature. Subsequently, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was changed to a dropping funnel, and then 8 mL of hydrochloric acid solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for 1 h at 80° C., and then cooled to room temperature, to which was added 12 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was reacted for additional 1 h, and then 10 mL of concentrated HCl was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.56 g of (E)-3-(2-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid as off-white crystalline soli ds (yield: 67.6%), To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.74 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(2-fluoro-3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid. 0.37 g (5.08 mmol) of n-butylamine, and 10 mL of absolute ethanol, and the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction solution was stirred. After the solids precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.78 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 9) (yield: 81.5%). [M+H]+: 452.20.
1H-NMR (CDCl3, δ (ppm)): δ 0.912 (3H), 1.276 (2H), 2.314 (2H), 3.251 (2H), 3.586 (3H), 3.773 (9H), 6.643 (2H), 7.084 (1H), 7.237 (1H), 7.539 (1H).
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 1.99 g (0.012 mol) of 4-fluoro-3,5- dimethoxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and allowed to react for 5 h at this temperature. Subsequently, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was changed to a dropping funnel, and then 8 mL of hydrochloric acid solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for 1 h at 80° C., and then cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was reacted for additional 1 h, and then 1.8 mL of concentrated HCl was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.47 g of (E)-3-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 62.9%).
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.81 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid, 10 mL of absolute ethanol, and 0.7 mL of 40% KOH solution, and the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction solution was stirred. After the solids precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.45 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 10) (yield: 69.6%). [M+H]+: 432.08. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, δ (ppm)): 3.541 (3H), 3.682 (3H), 3.773 (9H), 6.32.7 (2H), 6.495 (1H), 6.676 (1H), 7.329 (1H).
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 2.02 g (0.012 mol) of 3,5-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and allowed to react for 5 h at this temperature. Subsequently, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was changed to a dropping funnel, and then 8 mL of hydrochloric acid solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for 1 h at 80° C., and then cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% MOH solution. The reaction mixture was reacted for additional 1 h, and then 1.8 mL of concentrated HCl was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.14 g of (E)-3-(3,5-dihydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 56.8%),
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.82 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(3,5-dihydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(3A5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid, 0.37 g (5.08 mmol) of n-butylamine, and 10 mL of absolute ethanol, and the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction solution was stirred. After the solids precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.56 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound) (yield: 71.7%), [M+H]+: 450.21. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, δ (ppm)): 0.821 (3H), 1.327 (2H), 2.172 (2H), 3.319 (2H), 3.591 (3H), 3.836 (9H), 5.243 (2H), 6.385 (2H), 7.326 (2H), 7.613 (1H).
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 2.19 g (0.012 mol) of 3-hydroxy-2,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2. mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and allowed to react for 5 h at this temperature. Subsequently, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was changed to a dropping funnel, and then 8 mL of hydrochloric acid solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for 1 h at 80° C., and then cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% MOH solution. The reaction mixture was reacted for additional 1 h, and then 1.8 mL of concentrated HCl was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.38 g of (E)-3-(3-hydroxy-2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 61.0%).
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.89 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(3-hydroxy-2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid and 0.74 g (5.08 mmol) of lysine, followed by addition of ethanol (15 mL), and then the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction solution was heated to 60 CC in a water bath, and after the solution became clear, it was cooled to room temperature. After the solids precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 1.85 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 12) (yield: 75.5%). [M+H]+: 537.24. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, δ (ppm)): 1.183 (2H), 1.649 (2H), 2.173 (2H), 3.286 (2H), 3.513 (1H), 3.597 (3H), 3.876 (9H), 5.237 (2H), 5.459 (1H), 6.525 (2H), 7.193 (1H), 7.315 (1H), 7.613 (1H).
Preparation method: To a 50 mL three necked flask, were added 2.26 g (0.010 mol) of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylacetic acid and 1.99 g (0.012 mol) of 4-ethoxy-3-hydroxybenzaldehyde, and then 3.2 mL of acetic anhydride and 1.6 mL of triethylamine were added. The mixture was mixed well. The flask was equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser, and purged with nitrogen for protection. The reaction solution was heated in an oil bath to 150° C., and allowed to react for 5 h at this temperature. Subsequently, the reaction solution was cooled to 80° C. The reflux condenser was changed to a dropping funnel, and then 8 mL of HCl solution was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to react for 1 h at 80° C., and then cooled to room temperature, to which was added 2 mL of 40% NaOH solution. The reaction mixture was reacted for additional 1 h, and then 1.8 of concentrated HCl was added dropwise. After the solid precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred and reacted for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.02 g of (E)-3-(4-ethoxy-3-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl) acrylic acid as off-white crystalline solids (yield: 53.9%).
To a 10 mL three necked flask, were added 1.81 g (4.84 mmol) of (E)-3-(4-ethoxy-3-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid and 0.74 g (5.08 mmol) of lysine, followed by addition of ethanol (15 mL), and then the reaction was mixed well. The flask was fitted with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction solution was heated to 60° C. in a water bath, and after the solution became clear, it was cooled to room temperature. After the solids precipitated, the reaction solution was further stirred for 1 h, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with cold absolute ethanol, and dried under reduced pressure, to obtain 2.05 g of off-white crystalline solids (compound 13) (yield: 81.4%). [M+H]+: 521.25. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, δ (ppm)): 1.187 (2H), 1.341 (3H), 1.843 (2H), 2.117 (2H), 3.415 (2H), 3.523 (1H), 3.786 (9H), 4.217 (2H), 5.302 (2H), 5.476 (1H), 6.558 (2H), 7.181 (1H), 7.328 (1H), 7.613 (1H).
0.9% of the compound according to the present invention and NaCl injection was prepared for intravenous infusion:
Formulation 1:
According to the general procedures of the injection, a total of 1000 injections (2. ml/injection) were prepared, each containing 1 mg of compound 1.
According to the general procedures of the injection, a total of 1000 injections (20 mL/injection) were prepared, each containing 1.5 g of compound 2.
Formulation 3:
According to the general procedures of the injection, a total of 1000 injections (1000 mL/injection) were prepared, each containing 3 g of compound 2.
In order to improve the stability of the compound, when preparing the injection, the pharmaceutically acceptable common stabilizers, antioxidants, and regulators could also be added into the above formulations according to the conventional methods; for example, stabilizers such as cylodextrins inclusion compound; surfactants (anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, zwitterion surfactants, non-ionic surfactants), etc; antioxidants such as sodium sulfite, sodium bisulfite, sodium metabisulfite, sodium thiosulfate, ascorbic acid, cysteine, etc; pH regulators such as citric acid, fumaric acid, glutamic acid, L-aspartic acid, lactic acid, lactobionic acid, galacturonic acid, glucuronic acid, ascorbic acid, hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, etc.
According to the general procedures of sterile powder injection, a total of 1000 powder injections (2 mL/powder injection) were prepared, each containing 1 mg of compound 3.
According to the general procedures of sterile powder injection, a total of 1000 powder injections (20 mL/powder injection) were prepared, each containing 1.5 g of compound 3.
According to the general procedures of sterile powder injection, a total of 1000 powder injections (5 mL/powder injection) were prepared, each containing 3 g of compound 3.
5% of the compound according to the present invention and glucose injection was prepared for intravenous infusion:
According to the general procedures of the injection, a total of 1000 injections (2 mL/injection) were prepared, each containing 1 mg of compound 5.
According to the general procedures of the injection, a total of 1000 injections (20 mL injection) were prepared, each containing 1.5 g of compound 5.
According to the general procedures of the injection, a total of 1000 injections (1000 mL/injection) were prepared, each containing 3 g of compound 5.
A total of 1000 tablets were prepared, each tablet containing 1 mg of compound 6.
When preparing tablets, bulking agents can be selected from the group consisting of starch, dextrin, sugar powder, pregelatinized starch, lactose, glucose, microcrystalline cellulose, calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium bicarbonate, etc; adhesive agents can be selected from the group consisting of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose ; povidone, starch slurry, dextrin slurry ; syrup, mucilage, sodium alginate, polyethylene glycol, peach gum, arabic gum, etc; disintegrating agents can be selected from the group consisting of croscarmellose sodium, cross-linked povidone, sodium carboxymethyl starch, hydroxypropyl starch, low substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose, citric acid, tartaric acid, anhydride, sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, etc.
A total of 1000 capsules were prepared, each capsule containing 100 mg of compound 9.
When preparing capsules, bulking agents can be selected from the group consisting of starch, dextrin, sugar powder, pregelatinized starch, lactose, glucose, microcrystalline cellulose, calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium bicarbonate, etc; adhesive agents can be selected from the group consisting of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, povidone, starch slurry, dextrin slurry, syrup, mucilage, sodium alginate, polyethylene glycol, peach gum, arabic gum, etc;
The beneficial effects of the present invention were demonstrated with reference to the following specific Experimental examples.
LLC (mouse lung cancer cells) were a mouse Lewis lung cancer cells.
The modeling method for LLC cell lung cancer in mice was as follows:
LLC cells were cultured in the general medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 μg/mL of double antibody (penicillin±streptomycin), and then cultivated in a 37° C., 5% CO2 cell incubator for routine incubation. LLC cells, that had grown to logarithmic phase, were digested with 0.25% trypsin (containing EDTA) to form a cell suspension, which was centrifuged at 1000 rpm/min for 3 min. The supernatant was discarded, and cell precipitates were collected, that were resuspended in culture medium without serum and double antibody. The cell suspension was further centrifuged to adjust the volume under the same conditions with the aid of cell counting, so as to prepare a cell suspension at a concentration of 1×107/μL of cell suspension was injected into the right abdomen of each mouse, to complete the inoculation of tumor cells. The tumor was allowed to grew about 10 days, and the volume reached around 100 mm3, before the mice were treated with test compounds.
Drug preparation: compounds 1-13 of the present invention were respective prepared into an injection with injection water.
Experimental methods: The model mice with LLC cell lung cancer were treated by intraperitoneal administration of 400 mg/kg injection containing the compound of the present invention. The model mice were divided into a negative control group (model mice only receiving equal volume of injection water by intraperitoneal administration) and treatment groups (model mice receiving the injection prepared with the compound of the present invention by intraperitoneal administration). The intraperitoneal injection regimen was carried out by injecting once a day at the pre-determined time. Before administration, the mice were weighed, and then treated with the injection at a dosage of 10 mL/kg, After successive administration for 10 days, that is, on the 10th day after receiving treatment, the mice were sacrificed, and the subcutaneous tumors were stripped to detect the ratio of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen CD8+ in tumor tissues of the negative group and the treatment group by flow cytometry.
CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in tumor tissues were detected by flow cytometry. The specific steps were as follows:
The mice were sacrificed, and then the abdominal epidermis of the mice was cut open using ophthalmic scissors, to fully expose the subcutaneous tumors. The subcutaneous tumor tissues on the right side of the mouse's abdomen were gradually peeled off with tweezers and ophthalmic scissors. After rinsing with PBS, the stripped tumor tissues were cut into about 1 mm using ophthalmic scissors, and then placed in 3 mL of PBS buffer containing 100 μg/mL of hyaluronidase. A centrifuge tube containing a dispersed liquid was placed in a water bath and kept at 37° C. for 20 min. A pipette was used to blow and shake the digestive tumor tissues every 5 minutes to fully digest. The dispersed liquid containing undigested tumor tissues was filtered through a 70 μm stainless steel cell screen, and the remaining undigested tumor tissues were ground using a push rod of 20 mL syringe on 70 μm cell screen and rinsed 5 times with 1 mL of PBS while grinding. The cell suspension passing the cell screen was transferred to a 15 mL centrifuge tube, and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 3 min. Then, cell precipitates were collected, to which was added 2 mL of red cell lysis buffer, and rested for 10 min, followed by centrifuging at 4000 rpm for 3 min. After washing with PBS, the cells were resuspended by adding 2-3 mL of PBS.
An appropriate amount of cell suspension was used as the sample for flow cytometry, and after counting, the cell suspension was adjusted to have a concentration of 5×106/mL. 100 μL of cell suspension was added to a test tube with a pipettor. FITC anti-mouse CD3, PE-Cy5 anti-mouse CD8, and PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD45 were respectively added to each test tube, in which the first two were simultaneously added to a test tube. After adding fluorescent antibodies, the test tube was placed on ice and incubated in dark for 20 min. After adding 2 mL of sterilized PBS, the test tube was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. 0.5 mL of sterilized PBS was added to resuspend the cells, and a total cell count was 1×106 by detection with flow cytometry. The results were analyzed using BD-FACSDiVa.
Comparing the ratio of cytotoxic T lymphocytes containing CD8+ antigen in CD45+, CD3+, and CD8+ cells:
The IHC Profiler plugin of Image was used to process the tumor immunohistochemical microscopic image. The color deconvolution of the staining image was performed to separate the blue negative area and the brown positive area, and then the percentage of the positive area in the total area of the staining region was obtained.
The effect of drugs on the distribution of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) in tumor tissues and their cytotoxic effects on tumor cells were detected by immunohistochemistry. The specific procedures were as follows:
After 10 days of treatment, the mice were killed, the abdominal epidermis of the mice was cut open with ophthalmic scissors, and the tumor was removed and placed in formalin for fixation. After completion of fixation, the tumor tissues were embeded with paraffin, and two consecutive slices were cut off, which were transferred on a glass slide and dried (60° C., 1 h). After adding the primary antibody respectively, the slide was allowed to rest overnight at 4° C., followed by adding the second antibody dropwise. After staining with 4-aminodiphenyl (DAB), the slide was re-stained with haematoxylin, dehydrated, and covered after becoming transparent.
The entire slide image was captured at a 20× magnification, and then the stained section image was processed in image) to distinguish between blue negative areas and brown positive areas, and the percentage of positive areas in the total section area was calculated.
The research results are shown in Table 2.
Based on the experimental results, the compound of the present invention had a dual effect of enriching cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen CD8+ in tumor tissues and targeting the destruction of the inner wall of tumor blood vessels. The compound could greatly increase the enrichment ratio and distribution area of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen CD8+ in tumor tissues, and while killing tumor cells by cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen CD8+, it cuted off the blood supply to the tumor tissues, causing rapid necrosis within solid tumors.
Fusion HUVECs: HUVECs in the logarithmic growth phase were inoculated into a 96-well culture plate at 8×104/mL and 100 μL/well (i.e. 8000 cells/well). The cells were cultured in the medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, and then placed in a 37° C., 5% CO2 incubator for further incubation. After 24 h, the cells were treated with the test compound. The test compound was diluted with PBS(−) and added to each well (10 μL/well), 3 multiple wells for each concentration. The plate was cultivated for 24 h in the incubator, and then 10 μL of CCK-8 solution was added to each well, respectively, and during this process, it should be careful not to produce bubbles. Subsequently, the plate was incubated for additional about 2.5 h in the incubator, followed by measuring the absorbance. The OD value was obtained at a wavelength of 450 nm using an MK-2 fully automatic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system, and thus the IC50 value was calculated.
Nonfusion HUVECs: HUVECs in the logarithmic growth phase were inoculated in a 96-well plate at 2×104 mL and 100 μL/well (i.e. 2000 cells/well). The cells were cultured in the medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, and then placed in a 37° C., 5% CO2 incubator for further incubation. After 24 h, the cells were treated with the test compound. The test compound was diluted with PBS(−) and added to each well (10 μL/well), 3 multiple wells for each concentration. After the plate was transferred to the incubator and cultivated for 24 h, 10 μL of CCK-8 solution was added to each well, and during this process, close attention should be paid to avoid the generation of air bubbles. After the plate was incubated for additional about 2.5 h in the incubator, the absorbance can be measured. The OD value was tested at a wavelength of 450 nm using an MK-2 fully automatic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system, and thus the 1050 value was calculated.
Nonfusion human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were used to simulate new tumor blood vessels, while confluent HUVECs were used to simulate normal blood vessels, to construct experimental models. Two different HUVECs were treated with the compound at the same dosage of 10 μM, to simulate the fusion cell state, and proteome samples were prepared. After preparation of peptide segments, the segments were labelled with TMT, and a quantitative proteomics analysis was carried out. The efficiency of TMT labeling was higher than 99.4%, and a total of 28372 peptide segments from 4934 proteins were characterized using a strict 1% FDR limit. Among them, 4909 quantifiable proteins were identified, indicating reliable quality. The nonfusion treatment groups and the fusion treatment groups were compared with their respective control groups, and the control group was used as a reference, with a significant difference of more than 1.5 times or less than 0.67 times as the protein score standard.
The total cell proteins of the samples in nonfusion cell groups and fusion cell groups were extracted separately, and 2 μg of protein samples were subjected to quality analysis, The quantitative proteomics experiments were carried out, and the protein concentration assay was performed by quantitative grayscale measurement. The specific flowchart is shown in
Data analysis: The human protein database (Scientific name: Homo sapiens, 9606) was downloaded from UniProt, MaxQuant (v 1.5.5.1) search engine was used to search for the database. A total of 4934 proteins (4909 quantitative proteins) and 28372 peptide segments were identified by TMT quantitative proteomics experiments, with a labeling efficiency of more than 99%, and the complete digestion occupied 86.3%.
The proteomic assay results of the compound according to the present invention on nonfusion human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) are shown in Table 3.
GO enrichment analysis was performed on differential proteins, and nonfusion differential proteins were mainly involved in regulating intercellular adhesion. It indicated that the above compounds targetted to destroy the adhesion function of nonfusion human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), made the endothelial cells detach from the vascular base, thus causing nonfusion vascular inflammatory reactions and further blocking the blood vessels.
In this experiment, a human lung cancer A549 model transplanted into nude mice was selected to study the anti-tumor effect of test compounds. The mice were treated at a dosage of 400 mg/kg by gavage for 14 days, and the tumor inhibition rate against human lung cancer A549 was measured.
Preparation: The compound was prepared as the solution at the desired concentration with distilled water, prior to administration.
Animal strain: BALB/C nude mice (SPF grade), weight: 19-21 g, gender: male. Number of animals in each treatment group: 8; Number of animals in the control group: >12.
Lung cancer A549 tumor blocks with good growth were chosen and cut into uniform small pieces of 3 mm under sterile conditions, and then subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of each mouse with a cannula. These mice were divided into 9 groups, 8 mice for each treatment group, while more than 12 mice were included in the control group.
14 days after inoculation, the average volume of the tumor mass was about 100 mm3. The animals were regrouped based on the size of the tumor, and the mice with tumors that were too large and too small were eliminated. For each group, the average volume of tumors was basically the same, and then the mice were treated with test compounds. The mice in the treatment groups were administered once a day by gavage for 14 successive days, at a dosage of 0.5 mL/20 g body weight; the mice in the control group were given the same volume of physiological saline. From the 14th day of inoculation, the long diameter a (mm) of the tumor, together with the perpendicular short diameter b (mm), was measured using a digital electronic caliper, twice a week. The calculation formula of tumor volume is: TV=ab2/2, and the formula for calculating the relative tumor volume is RTV=Vt/Vo, wherein Vo denotes the tumor volume measured when the mice were divided into groups (i.e. d1), and Vt is the tumor volume from each measurement.
The result determination is based on the following formula:
The experimental results are shown in Table 4:
Based on the above experimental results: some compounds of the present invention had significant inhibitory effects on lung cancer, especially compound 6, which had the best inhibitory effect on lung cancer and could be used to prepare medicaments for treating lung cancer.
A human liver cancer QGY7703 model transplanted into nude mice was used in the experiment to investigate the anti-tumor effect of test compounds. The mice were intravenously injected at a dosage of 100 mg/kg for 14 days, and the tumor inhibition rate against human liver cancer QGY7703 was measured.
Preparation: The compound was prepared as the injection at the desired concentration with sterile normal saline, prior to administration.
Animal strain: BALB/C nude mice (SPF grade), weight: 19-21 g, gender: male. Number of animals in each treatment group: 8; number of animals in the control group: >12.
The tumor blocks of human liver cancer QGY7703 with good growth were cut into uniform small pieces of 3 mm under sterile conditions, and then subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of each mouse with a cannula. These mice were divided into 9 groups, 8 mice for each treatment group, while more than 12 mice were included in the control group.
14 days after inoculation, the average volume of the tumor block was about 100 mm3. The animals were regrouped based on the size of the tumor, and the animals with tumors that were too large and too small were sifted out. For each group, the average volume of tumors was basically the same, and then the mice were initially treated with test compounds. The mice in the treatment groups were intravenously injected once a day for 14 days, at a dosage of 0.1 mL/20 g body weight; the mice in the control group were given the same volume of sterile normal saline. From the 14th day of inoculation, the long diameter a (mm) of the tumor, together with the perpendicular short diameter b (mm), was measured using a digital electronic caliper, twice a week. The calculation formula of tumor volume is: TV=ab2/2, and the formula for calculating the relative tumor volume is RTV=Vt/Vo, wherein Vo denotes the tumor volume measured when the mice were divided into groups (i.e. d1), and Vt is the tumor volume from each measurement.
The result determination is based on the following formula:
The experimental results are shown in Table 5:
Based on the above experimental results: some compounds of the present invention had significant inhibitory effects on liver cancer, especially compound 6, which had the best inhibitory effect on liver cancer and could be used to prepare medicaments for treating liver cancer,
A human gastric cancer MGC803 model transplanted into nude mice was used in the experiment to investigate the anti-tumor effect of test compounds. The mice were intraperitoneally injected at a dosage of 200 mg/kg for consecutive 14 days, and the tumor inhibition rate against human gastric cancer MGC803 was measured.
Preparation: The compound was prepared as the injection at the desired concentration with sterile normal saline, prior to administration.
Animal strain: BALB/C nude mice (SPF grade), weight: 19-21 g, gender: male.
Number of animals in each treatment group: 8; number of animals in the control group: >12.
The tumor blocks of human gastric cancer MGC803 with good growth were cut into uniform small pieces of 3 mm under sterile conditions, and then subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of each mouse with a cannula. These mice were divided into 9 groups, 8 mice for each treatment group, while more than 12 mice were included in the control group.
14 days after inoculation, the average volume of the tumor block was about 100 mm3. The animals were regrouped based on the size of the tumor, and the animals with tumors that were too large and too small were sifted out. For each group, the average volume of tumors was basically the same, and then the mice were initially treated with test compounds. The mice were intraperitoneally injected once a day for 14 days, at a dosage of 0.2 mL/20 g body weight. From the 14th day of inoculation, the long diameter a (mm) of the tumor, together with the perpendicular short diameter b (mm), was measured using a digital electronic caliper, twice a week. The calculation formula of tumor volume is: TV=ab2/2, and the formula for calculating the relative tumor volume is RTV=Vt/Vo, wherein Vo denotes the tumor volume measured when the mice were divided into groups(i.e. d1), and Vt is the tumor volume from each measurement.
The result determination is based on the following formula:
The experimental results are shown in Table 6:
Based on the above experimental results: some compounds of the present invention had significant inhibitory effects on gastric cancer, and especially, compound 6 had the best inhibitory effect on gastric cancer and could be used in the preparation of medicaments for treating gastric cancer.
A human ovarian cancer A2780 model transplanted into nude mice was used in the experiment to investigate the anti-tumor effect of test compounds. The mice were intraperitoneally injected at a dosage of 200 mg/kg for successive 14 days, and the tumor inhibition rate against human ovarian cancer A2780 was measured.
Preparation: The compound was prepared as the injection at the desired concentration with sterile normal saline, prior to administration.
Animal strain: BALB/C nude mice (SPF grade), weight: 19-21 g, gender: male.
Number of animals in each treatment group: 8; number of animals in the control group: >12.
The tumor blocks of human ovarian cancer A2780 growing well were cut into uniform small pieces of 3 mm under sterile conditions, and then subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of each mouse with a cannula. The mice were divided into 9 groups, 8 mice for each treatment group, while >12 mice were included in the control group.
14 days after inoculation, the average volume of the tumor block was about 100 mm3. The animals were regrouped based on the size of the tumor, and the animals with tumors that were too large and too small were sifted out. For each group, the average volume of tumors was basically the same, and then the mice were initially treated with test compounds. The mice were intraperitoneally injected once a day for 14 days, at a dosage of 0.2 mL/20 g body weight; the mice in the control group were given the same volume of sterile normal saline. From the 14th day of inoculation, the long diameter a (mm) of the tumor, together with the perpendicular short diameter b (mm), was measured using a digital electronic caliper, twice a week. The calculation formula of tumor volume is: TV=ab2/2, and the formula for calculating the relative tumor volume is RTV=Vt/Vo, wherein Vo denotes the tumor volume measured when the mice were divided into groups (i.e. d1), and Vt is the tumor volume from each measurement.
The result determination is based on the following formula:
The experimental results are shown in Table 7:
Based on the above experimental results: some compounds of the present invention had significant inhibitory effects on ovarian cancer, and especially, compound 6 had the best inhibitory effect on ovarian cancer and could be used in the preparation of medicaments for treating ovarian cancer.
A human prostate cell LNCaP model transplanted into nude mice was used in the experiment to investigate the anti-tumor effect of test compounds. The mice were intraperitoneally injected at a dosage of 200 mg/kg for successive 14 days, and the tumor inhibition rate against human prostate cell LNCaP was measured.
Preparation: The compound was prepared as the injection at the desired concentration with sterile normal saline, prior to administration.
Animal strain: BALB/C nude mice (SPF grade), weight: 19-21 g, gender: male.
Number of animals in each treatment group: 8; number of animals in the control group: >12.
The tumor blocks of human prostate cell LNCaP with good growth were cut into uniform small pieces of 3 mm under sterile conditions, and then subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of each mouse with a cannula. The mice were divided into 9 groups, 8 mice for each treatment group, while >12 mice were included in the control group,
14 days after inoculation, the average volume of the tumor block was about 100 mm3. The animals were regrouped based on the size of the tumor, and the animals with tumors that were too large and too small were sifted out, For each group, the average volume of tumors was basically the same, and then the mice were initially treated with test compounds. The mice were intraperitoneally injected once a day for 14 days, at a dosage of 0.2 mL/20 g body weight; the mice in the control group were given the same volume of sterile normal saline. From the 14th day of inoculation, the long diameter a (mm) of the tumor, together with the perpendicular short diameter b (mm), was measured using a digital electronic caliper, twice a week. The calculation formula of tumor volume is: TV=ab2/2, and the formula for calculating the relative tumor volume is: RTV=Vt/Vb, wherein Vo denotes the tumor volume measured when the mice were divided into groups (i.e. d1), and Vt denotes the tumor volume from each measurement.
The result determination is based on the following formula:
The experimental results are shown in Table 8:
Based on the above experimental results: some compounds of the present invention had significant inhibitory effects on prostate cancer, and especially, compound 4 had the best inhibitory effect on prostate cancer and could be used in the preparation of medicaments for treating prostate cancer.
A human renal cell carcinoma AGHN model transplanted into nude mice was used in the experiment to investigate the anti-tumor effect of test compounds. The mice were intraperitoneally injected at a dosage of 200 mg/kg for successive 14 days, and the tumor inhibition rate against human renal cell carcinoma. AGHN was measured.
Preparation: The compound was prepared as the injection at the desired concentration with sterile normal saline, prior to administration.
Animal strain: BALB/C, nude mice (SPF grade), weight: 19-21 g, gender: male. Number of animals in each treatment group: 8; number of animals in the control group: >12.
The tumor blocks of human renal cell carcinoma AGHN with good growth were cut into uniform small pieces of 3 mm under sterile conditions, and then subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of each mouse with a cannula. The mice were divided into 9 groups, 8 mice for each treatment group, while >12 mice were included in the control group.
14 days after inoculation, the average volume of the tumor block was about 100 mm3, The animals were regrouped based on the size of the tumor, and the animals with tumors that were too large and too small were sifted out. For each group, the average volume of tumors was basically the same, and then the mice were initially treated with test compounds. The mice were intraperitoneally injected once a day for 14 days, at a dosage of 0.2 mL/20 g body weight; the mice in the control group were given the same volume of sterile normal saline. From the 14th day of inoculation, the long diameter a (mm) of the tumor, together with the perpendicular short diameter b (mm), was measured using a digital electronic caliper, twice a week. The calculation formula of tumor volume is: TV=ab2/2, and the formula for calculating the relative tumor volume is: RTV=Vt/Vo, wherein Vo denotes the tumor volume measured when the mice were divided into groups (i.e. d1), and Vt denotes the tumor volume from each measurement.
The result determination is based on the following formula:
The experimental results are shown in Table 9:
Based on the above experimental results: some compounds of the present invention had significant inhibitory effects on renal cell carcinoma, and especially, compound 4 had the best inhibitory effect on renal cell carcinoma and could be used in the preparation of medicaments for treating renal cell carcinoma.
Well growing solid tumors (human lung cancer 951) and human liver cancer Bel7404) were cut into uniform small pieces of approximate 2-3 mm under sterile conditions, and subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of each nude mouse using a cannula. 14 days after inoculation, each mouse was treated with compound 6 by oral administration at a dosage of 400 mg/kg (in a dosage by volume of 0.5 mL/20 g body weight), and compound 6 was prepared as a suitable solution with sterile normal saline. At different time points (4 h, 24 h) after administration, the nude mice were killed, and the tumor tissue was dissected and fixed with 10% formalin. The pathological sections were made, followed by HE staining and taking photos, to observe the internal necrosis and cell proliferation within the tumors.
HE staining is shown in
Well growing solid tumors (human lung cancer 95) and human liver cancer Bel7404) were cut into uniform small pieces of approximate 2-3 mm under sterile conditions, and subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of each nude mouse using a cannula. 14 days after inoculation, each mouse was treated with compound 6 by oral administration at a dosage of 400 mg/kg (a dosage by volume of 0.5 mL/20 g body weight), and compound 6 was prepared as a suitable solution with sterile normal saline. At different time points (4 h, 24 h) after administration, the nude mice were killed, and the tumor tissue was dissected and fixed with 10% formalin, The pathological slices were made, followed by HE staining and photographing, to observe the damage to the blood vessels of tumors.
PCNA immunohistochemistry showed (
Experimental method: The model of human liver cancer Bel7404 transplant tumor in nude mice was established by subcutaneously inoculating human liver cancer Bel7404 cell lines into the armpits of nude mice. Cells were inoculated in an amount of 1×106, and after formation of the transplanted tumors by inoculation, the cells were passed 3 generations in nude mice before use. The vigorous growth of tumor tissue was cut into approximate 1.5 mm3, and homogenized under sterile conditions, to prepare 1×107/mL of cell suspension. 0.1 mL of cell suspension was subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of nude mice. For transplanted tumors in nude mice, the diameter of the transplanted tumor was measured with vernier caliper. After the tumor grew to 100 mm3, the animals were randomly divided into groups, with 6 animals in each group. Using the method of measuring tumor diameter, the anti-tumor effect of test compound was dynamically observed. Compound 3 was orally administered at 400 mg/kg, once a day, for three weeks; lenvartinib was also orally administered at 10 mg/kg, once a day, for two weeks. The measurement frequency of tumor diameter was once every three days. The animals in the negative control group were orally given an equal amount of physiological saline. The effect of combined medicaments was evaluated based on the Q value calculated by the Jin's formula:
Q=Ea+b/(Ea+Eb−Ea×Eb)
Ea+b represents the tumor inhibitory rate of the combined medicaments, while Ea and Eb represent the tumor inhibitory rates of medicament A and medicament B, respectively. For example, the Q value of 0.85-1.15 means additive action (+), and the Q value of >1.15 means synergistic action (++).
The experimental results are shown in Table 10:
Compound 3 combined with lenvatinib had a Q value of 0.970, indicating a significant anti-tumor additive effect, but no synergistic anti-tumor effect. No obvious decrease in animal weight was observed, and the mice did not show obvious toxic addition reaction after treatment with compound 3 in combination with lenvatinib.
Experimental method: The model of human gastric cancer SGC7901 transplant tumor in nude mice was established by subcutaneously inoculating human gastric cancer SGC7901 cell lines into the armpits of nude mice. Cells were inoculated in an amount of 1×106, and after formation of the transplanted tumors by inoculation, the cells were passed 3 generations in nude mice before use. The vigorous growth of tumor tissue was cut into approximate 1.5 mm3, and homogenized under sterile conditions, to prepare 1×107/mL of cell suspension. 0.1 mL of cell suspension was subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of nude mice. For transplanted tumors in nude mice, the diameter was measured with vernier caliper. After the tumor grew to 100 mm3, the animals were randomly divided into groups, with 6 mice in each group. Using the method of measuring tumor diameter, the anti-tumor effect of test compound was dynamically observed. Compound 6 was administered at 200 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection, once every other day, for three weeks; paclitaxel was administered at 10 mg/kg by intravenous injection, once every other day, for three weeks. The measurement frequency of tumor diameter was once every three days. The dosage by volume was 0.1 mL/20 g. The mice in the negative control group were given an equal amount of physiological saline by intravenous injection. The effect of combined medicaments was evaluated based on the Q value calculated by Jin's formula:
Q=Ea+b/(Ea+Eb−Ea×Eb)
Ea+b represents the tumor inhibitory rate of the combined medicaments, while Ea and Eb represent the tumor inhibitory rates of medicament A and medicament B, respectively. For example, the Q value of 0.85-1.15 means additive action (+), while the Q value of >1.15 means synergistic action (++).
The experimental results are shown in Table 11:
The Q value for compound 6 in combination with paclitaxel was 0.927, indicating a significant anti-tumor additive effect, without synergistic anti-tumor effect. There was no obvious decrease in animal weight, and when combined with paclitaxel, the mice in the treatment group of paclitaxel+compound 6 did not show obvious toxic addition reaction.
Experimental method: The model of human lung cancer A549 transplant tumor in nude mice was established by subcutaneously inoculating human lung cancer A549 cell lines into the armpits of nude mice. Cells were inoculated in an amount of 1×106, and after formation of the transplanted tumors by inoculation, the cells were passed 3 generations in nude mice before use. The vigorous growth of tumor tissue was cut into approximate 1.5 mm3, and homogenized under sterile conditions, to prepare 1×107/mL of cell suspension. 0.1 mL of cell suspension was subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of nude mice. For transplanted tumors in nude mice, the diameter was measured with vernier caliper. After the tumor grew to 100 mm3, the animals were randomly divided into groups, with 6 mice in each group. Using the method of measuring tumor diameter, the anti-tumor effect of test compound was dynamically Observed. Compound 8 was administered at 200 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection, once every other day, for three weeks; carboplatin was administered at 10 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection, once every other day, for three weeks. The measurement frequency of tumor diameter was once every three days. The dosage by volume was 0.1 mL/20 g. The mice in the negative control group were given an equal amount of physiological saline by intravenous injection. The effect of combined medicaments was evaluated based on the Q value calculated by Jin's formula:
Q=Ea+b/(Ea+Eb−Ea×Eb)
Ea+b represents the tumor inhibitory rate of the combined medicaments, while Ea and Eb represent the tumor inhibitory rates of medicament A and medicament B, respectively. For example, the Q value of 0.85-1.15 means additive action (+), while the Q value of >1.15 means synergistic action (++).
The experimental results are shown in Table 12:
The Q value for compound 8 combined with carboplatin was 0.941, indicating a significant anti-tumor additive effect, without synergistic anti-tumor effect. There was no obvious decrease in animal weight, but when combined with carboplatin, the mice in the treatment group of carboplatin compound 8 did not show obvious toxic addition reaction.
Experimental method: The model of transplant tumor in C57BL/6 mice was established by subcutaneously inoculating Lewis non-small cell lung cancer cell lines into the armpits of C57BL/6 mice. Cells were inoculated in an amount of 1×106, and after formation of the transplanted tumors by inoculation, the cells were passed 3 generations in C57BL/6 mice before use. The vigorous growth of tumor tissue was cut into approximate 1.5 mm3, and homogenized under sterile conditions, to prepare 1×107/mL of cell suspension. 0.1 mL of cell suspension was subcutaneously inoculated into the right armpit of C57BL/6 mice. For transplanted tumors in C57BL/6 mice, the diameter was measured with vernier caliper. After the tumor grew to 100 mm3, the animals were randomly divided into groups, with 6 mice in each group. Using the method of measuring tumor diameter, the anti-tumor effect of test compound was dynamically observed. Compound 11 was administered at 200 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection, once every other day, for three weeks; PD-L1 was administered at 10 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection, once every other day, for three weeks. The measurement frequency of tumor diameter was once every three days. The dosage by volume was 0.1 mL/20 g. The mice in the negative control group were given an equal amount of physiological saline by intravenous injection.
The effect of combined medicaments was evaluated based on the Q value calculated by Jin's formula:
Q=Ea+b/(Ea+Eb−Ea×Eb)
Ea+b represents the tumor inhibitory rate of the combined medicaments, while Ea and Eb represent the tumor inhibitory rates of medicament A and medicament B, respectively. For example, the Q value of 0.85-1.15 means additive action (+), while the Q value of >1.15 means synergistic action (++).
The experimental results are shown in Table 13:
The Q value for compound 11 combined with PD-L1 was 1.16, indicating the combination of compound 11 and PD-L1 had a significant synergistic anti-tumor effect. There was no obvious decrease in animal weight, and the mice in the treatment group of PD-L1+compound 11 did not show obvious toxic addition reaction.
Experimental method: QGY7703 tumor cells were washed twice with PBS, and then resuspended with PBS:Matrix (1:1 mixture by volume). The cell concentration was adjusted to 2.5×106/mL, and subcutaneously inoculated to the right armpit of experimental animals at 200 μL/mouse, i.e. 5×105 cells/mouse. When the tumor grew to about 50 mm3, the mice were divided into groups for administration.
T cell culture and harvest: PBMCs of donors were activated and expanded in vitro according to the standard operating procedures for T cell culture. The cells in logarithmic growth phase were harvested and suspended in the medium at a moderate dose (2×107/mL) for future use.
When the tumor grew to the suitable size, separate injection of T cell and compound 6 was performed, and the time was recorded as D0. Compound 6 was intraperitoneally injected at a dose of 200 mg/kg. Starting from day 0 (D0), compound 6 was administered daily for successive 14 days. T cells were administrated by subcutaneous injection, and the injection site was the same as the inoculation site of tumor cells. The administration of T cells was carried out on D0 by three injections, and the injection regimen is shown in Table 14 below. T cells were administered approximate 4 hours after administration of compound 6.
The general conditions, body weight, tumor volume, and tumor weight of mice were recorded every 3 days. Based on the status of the tumor, whether EAL was further injected was decided.
The effect of combined medicaments was evaluated based on the Q value calculated by Jin's formula:
Q=Ea+b/(Ea+Eb−Ea×Eb)
Ea+b represents the tumor inhibitory rate of the combined medicaments, while Ea and Eb represent the tumor inhibitory rates of medicament A and medicament B, respectively. For example, the Q value of 0.85-1.15 means additive action (+), while the Q value of >1.15 means synergistic action (++),
The experimental results are shown in Table 15:
The Q value for compound 6 combined with T cells was 1.20, indicating the combination of compound 6 and T cells had a significant synergistic effects on liver cancers. There was no obvious decrease in animal weight, and the mice in the treatment group of T cells+compound 6 did not show obvious toxic addition reaction.
Experimental examples 14 and 15 demonstrated that the stilbene compounds of the present invention could be used in combination with tumor immunotherapy drugs to play synergistic anti-tumor effects.
Under sterile conditions, 1316 mouse melanoma cells in logarithmic growth period were cultured, and then prepared as 2.8×105/mL of cell suspension, which was inoculated into the tail vein of C57BL/6 mice at 0.2 mL/mouse. Compound 6 was administered to the mice on the next day. The dosage regimen was shown in Table 16. Three weeks later, each animal was sacrificed, and the lungs of mice in each group were dissected. The number of metastatic colonies in the lungs of mice was detected and counted, and the average number of tumor colonies in each group was used to calculate the tumor inhibitory rate according to the formula: Tumor inhibitory rate %=[(The average number of colonies in the control group−the average number of colonies in the treatment group)/The average number of colonies in the control group]×100%, The results are shown in Table 16.
The results showed that compound 6 could inhibit the metastasis of B16 mouse melanoma in a dose-dependent manner, which might be related to inhibiting the movement of tumor thrombus,
Four SD rats, regardless of gender, were subjected to single eye modeling, with a total of four eye models. One eye was used as a blank control (untreated group), one eye was used as a model control, one eye was used as treatment group 1, and one eye was used as treatment group 2.
The rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (25-30 mg/(kg, intraperitoneal injection), and two drops of oxybuprocaine hydrochloride eye drops were administrated to both eyes for ocular surface anesthesia. 30 μL of NaOH solution (1 mol/L) was placed with a pipette on a dry filter paper with a diameter of approximate 3 mm for 10 seconds. The moistened circular filter paper was gently applied to the center of the cornea (covering the corneoscleral margin) of the model eye, and a tight fit was kept for suitable time. The filter paper was removed, and then physiological saline was used to wash the eye, which was rinsed with a needle for 1 minute. After operation, ofloxacin eye ointment was applied to prevent infection (3 times/day, for 5 days).
From the beginning of modeling, on the first, third, fifth, seventh, and tenth days (D1, D3, D5, D7, and D10), the conjunctival congestion, corneal edema, and corneal neovascularization of the anterior eye segment were observed with a slit-lamp.
On the 5th day (D5), neovascularization began to appear, and D5 was the first day of administrating the test compound (d1). Three eye drops were administered daily for 10 consecutive days (d10). On the 10th day after administration, the conjunctival congestion, corneal edema and corneal neovascularization of the anterior segment were observed with a slit-lamp. After completion of the experiment, the rats were euthanized.
Blank control group (untreated group): no any treatment, no modeling, no administration. Model group: A circular filter paper (with a diameter of approximate 3 mm) moistened with 30 μL of NaOH (1 mol/L) was gently applied to the cornea for modeling, and anti infection treatment was performed after modeling; but no medicament was administrated.
Treatment group 1: After modeling, compound 6 was dissolved in physiological saline at a concentration of 10 mg/mL and administered at 50 μL/eye by dropping in the conjunctival sac of lower eyelid, 3 times/day, for 10 days;
Treatment group 2: After modeling, compound 6 was dissolved in physiological saline at a concentration of 25 mg/mL, and administered at 50 μL/eye by dropping in the conjunctival sac of lower eyelid, 3 times/day, for 10 days.
The results are shown in
In summary, the present invention provided the use of stilbene compounds in the preparation of anti-tumor medicaments. In the present invention, it was found that stilbene compounds had a dual effect of enriching CD8+ T lymphocytes in solid tumors and targeting to damage the inner wall of tumor blood vessels. The stilbenes could kill tumor cells by cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen CD8+, and block the blood supply to tumor tissues at the same time, and thus cause rapid necrosis in solid tumors, together with inhibition on tumor metastasis, thereby greatly improving the killing effects on tumors. The stilbene compounds of the present invention could be used in the preparation of anti-tumor medicaments, and also used in combination with tumor immunotherapeutics to achieve synergistic anti-tumor effects. Among these stilbene compounds, the compounds with different structures might have different anti-tumor effects and thus could be used in the preparation of different anti-tumor medicaments. In addition, the stilbene compounds of the present invention could inhibit the growth of ocular surface blood vessels and be used in the preparation of medicaments for treating various eye diseases. The stilbene compounds of the present invention had good application prospects.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 202211155404.9 | Sep 2022 | CN | national |
